DOCSLIB.ORG

SAINT LUCIA Third National Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SAINT LUCIA Third National Report SAINT LUCIA Third national report CONTENTS A. REPORTING PARTY ........................................................................................................................ 2 Information on the preparation of the report............................................................................. 2 B. PRIORITY SETTING, TARGETS AND OBSTACLES............................................................................ 6 Priority Setting......................................................................................................................... 8 Challenges and Obstacles to Implementation............................................................................ 9 2010 Target........................................................................................................................... 12 Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC)........................................................................ 56 Ecosystem Approach .............................................................................................................. 79 C. ARTICLES OF THE CONVENTION.................................................................................................. 81 Article 5 – Cooperation........................................................................................................... 81 Article 6 - General measures for conservation and sustainable use.......................................... 83 Biodiversity and Climate Change....................................................................................... 87 Article 7 - Identification and monitoring.................................................................................. 89 Decisions on Taxonomy .................................................................................................... 92 Article 8 - In-situ conservation [Excluding paragraphs (a) to (e), (h) and (j)].......................... 95 Programme of Work on Protected Areas (Article 8 (a) to (e)) ............................................ 98 Article 8(h) - Alien species.................................................................................................... 102 Article 8(j) - Traditional knowledge and related provisions .................................................... 107 GURTS ........................................................................................................................... 107 Status and Trends .......................................................................................................... 107 Akwé:Kon Guidelines...................................................................................................... 108 Capacity Building and Participation of Indigenous and Local Communities ....................... 109 Support to implementation............................................................................................. 110 Article 9 - Ex-situ conservation............................................................................................. 112 Article 10 - Sustainable use of components of biological diversity.......................................... 114 Biodiversity and Tourism................................................................................................ 118 Article 11 - Incentive measures ............................................................................................ 120 Article 12 - Research and training......................................................................................... 124 Article 13 - Public education and awareness.......................................................................... 126 Article 14 - Impact assessment and minimizing adverse impacts........................................... 131 Article 15 - Access to genetic resources ................................................................................ 136 Article 16 - Access to and transfer of technology................................................................... 139 Programme of Work on transfer of technology and technology cooperation ..................... 140 Article 17 - Exchange of information..................................................................................... 144 Article 18 - Technical and scientific cooperation .................................................................... 145 Article 19 - Handling of biotechnology and distribution of its benefits .................................... 149 Article 20 – Financial resources ............................................................................................ 150 D. THEMATIC AREAS ..................................................................................................................... 162 Inland water ecosystems...................................................................................................... 164 Marine and coastal biological diversity .................................................................................. 166 General............................................................................................................................. 166 Implementation of Integrated Marine and Coastal Area Management ................................. 168 Marine and Coastal Living Resources ................................................................................. 169 Mariculture ........................................................................................................................ 172 Alien Species and Genotypes ............................................................................................. 173 Agricultural biological diversity ............................................................................................. 174 Annex to decision V/5 - Programme of work on agricultural biodiversity............................. 174 Forest Biological Diversity..................................................................................................... 180 General............................................................................................................................. 180 Expanded programme of work on forest biological diversity ............................................... 182 Biological diversity of dry and sub-humid lands..................................................................... 190 Mountain Biodiversity........................................................................................................... 192 E. OPERATIONS OF THE CONVENTION........................................................................................... 196 F. COMMENTS ON THE FORMAT..................................................................................................... 198 1 A. REPORTING PARTY Contracting Party Saint Lucia N A T I O N A L F O C A L P O I N T Full name of the institution Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Name and title of contact Mr. Martin Satney, Permanent Secretary officer 5th Floor, Sir Stanislas James Building, The Waterfront, Mailing address Castries Telephone 758-4684103 Fax 758-4536314 E-mail [email protected] CONTACT OFFICER FOR NATIONAL REPORT (IF DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE) Full name of the institution Same as above Name and title of contact Anita James, Biodiversity Coordinator officer 4th Floor, Sir Stanislas James Building, The Waterfront, Mailing address Castries Telephone 758-4684122/27 Fax 758-4532035 E-mail [email protected] S U B M I S S I O N Signature of officer responsible for submitting national report Date of submission Informatiion on the preparatiion of the report Box I. Please provide information on the pre paration of this report, including information on stakeholders involved and material used as a basis for the report. The preparation of this report involved the following:- Ø Identification of relevant supporting documents Ø Review of the selected documents Ø Discussions with selected members of the National Biodiversity Committee Ø Supplying responses to questions as provided by the documents Ø Consulting with persons, private and public sector, with intimate knowledge of the work programs of the various components of biodiversity, to obtain further information for the report 2 Ø Consulting with leaders of the technical committees on completeness of responses Ø Consulting with stakeholders at three locations (North, South and West) of the island to gain their perspective on matters included in the report and to share with them work done to date re: the N.B.S.A.P, Survey conducted etc. Ø Document (Report) review by Coordinator of the project. Persons involved in the preparation of this report and who were consulted on a one-one basis are - Mrs. Joan Norville, Director of Agricultural Services Ms. Anita James, Coordinator , National Biosafety Project/Biodiversity Coordinator Mr Michael Andrew, Deputy Chief Forestry Officer (former) Mr. Michael Bobb, Assistant Chief Forest Officer for Conservation Mr. Donald Anthony, Wildlife officer Mr. Donatien Gustave, Forestry officer Mrs. Alicia George, Head, Propagation Station Mr. Rufus Leandre, Chief Agricultural Extension Officer Mrs. Susanna Debeauville-Scott, Fisheries Biologist Mr. Ross Garner, Fisheries Officer Mr. Crispin d’Auvergne, Chief Sustainable and Environment Officer Ms. Shirlene Simmons, Project Coordinator, Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants Ms. Maria Mombelli, Secretary, National Emergency Management Organization(NEMO) Ms. Laverne Walker, Sustainable Development and Environment Officer, Coastal Zone Management Mr. Kai Wulf, Manager,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Environment Outlook
    CARIBBEAN ENVIRONMENT OUTLOOK Special Edition for the Mauritius International Meeting for the 10-year Review of the Barbados Programme of Action for the Sustainable Development of Small Island Developing States CARICOM CARIBBEAN — ENVIRONMENT OUTLOOK ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Editor Cox (Bahamas), Leonie Barnaby (Jamaica), Patrick Sherry Heileman, Consultant McConney (Barbados), Enrique Dalmau (Cuba), Patricia Aquing (St Lucia), Reynold Murray (St Vincent), Navin Lead authors Chandarpal (Guyana), Conrod Hunte (Antigua and Leslie John Walling (Belize), Dr Charles Douglas Barbuda), Milton Haughton (Belize), Bishnu Persaud (Jamaica), Maurice Mason (Jamaica) and Marcia (Guyana), Chris Corbin (St Lucia), Kelvin Penn (British Chevannes-Creary (Jamaica) Virgin Islands), Edwin Carrington (Guyana), Jose L. Gerhartz (Jamaica), Sharon Lindo (Belize), Leonardo The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Nurse (Barbados), Byron Blake (Guyana), Ricardo would like to thank the following individuals and Sanchez Sosa (Mexico) and Mark Griffith (Mexico). institutions who played a vital role in the Thanks go to Diane Quarless (SIDS Unit) and United production of this report: Nations Department for Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) for facilitating this consultation. The Caribbean Community Secretariat and the University of the West Indies Centre for Environment Sincere appreciation is also extended to Arthur Dahl and Development (UWICED) for being the partners in (Consultant Advisor, UNEP), Espen Ronneberg (UNDESA) this project.The Caribbean Community Climate
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Assessment of the Eastern Caribbean
    BIODIVERSITY ASSESSMENT OF THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN Biodiversity Programme Publication #5 Prepared By island resources FOUNDATION Eastern Caribbean Biodiversity Programme PO Box 2103 St. John's, ANTIGUA Email: <[email protected]> May 1998 Revised June 1999 Organization of the Report Introduction........................................................... .................. 1 Terrestrial Biodiversity: Ecosystems ............................................. 1 • The WWF /WB Conservation Assessment of the. ... ... .. .... .. ...... ... ... 2 Terrestrial Ecoregions of Latin American and the Caribbean • Scale Issues ............................................................................. 5 • Finer-scale Classifications of Terrestrial Ecosystems of the ............... 6 Eastern Caribbean Terrestrial Biodiversity: Species Richness and Endemism ............... 10 • Invertebrates .......................................................................... 11 • Birds .................................................................................... 12 Protecting Terrestrial Biodiversity ............................................... 14 Marine Biodiversity.............................................................. .... 15 • Marine Ecosystem Biodiversity .................................................. 16 • Marine Mammals.. ..... ... ....... ... ... ........ ... .... ... .. ... ... .. ... .. .. ... .. 18 Protecting Marine Biodiversity ................................................... 18 Factors Complicating An Assessment of Eastern ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • The European Union and Latin America and the Caribbean Convergent and Sustainable Strategies in the Current Global Environment
    The European Union and Latin America and the Caribbean Convergent and sustainable strategies in the current global environment FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT WITH EQUALITY Thank you for your interest in this ECLAC publication ECLAC Publications Please register if you would like to receive information on our editorial products and activities. When you register, you may specify your particular areas of interest and you will gain access to our products in other formats. www.cepal.org/en/suscripciones Alicia Bárcena Executive Secretary Mario Cimoli Deputy Executive Secretary Raúl García-Buchaca Deputy Executive Secretary for Management and Programme Analysis Ricardo Pérez Chief, Publications and Web Services Division This document was prepared by the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) for the Meeting of Foreign Ministers of the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) and the European Union, held in Brussels on 16 and 17 July 2018. Álvaro Calderón and Sebastián Rovira of the Division of Production, Productivity and Management of ECLAC were responsible for the overall coordination of the document. The following staff members contributed to its preparation: Leandro Cabello, Mathilde Closset, Marco Dini, Valeria Jordán, Jorge Patiño, Wilson Peres, Cecilia Plottier, Laura Poveda, Nunzia Saporito and Giovanni Stumpo of the Division of Production, Productivity and Management; Daniel Titelman, Jürgen Weller and Cecilia Vera of the Economic Development Division; Sebastián Herreros and Javier Meneses of the Division of International Trade and Integration; Simone Cecchini, Beatriz Morales and Daniela Trucco of the Social Development Division; Eduardo Alatorre, David Barrio Lamarche and Carlos de Miguel of the Sustainable Development and Human Settlements Division; and Jeannette Sánchez of the Natural Resources and Infrastructure Division.
    [Show full text]
  • Orchid Distribution and Bioclimatic Niches As a Strategy to Climate Change in Areas of Tropical Dry Forest in Colombia
    LANKESTERIANA 17(1): 17-47. 2017. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/lank.v17i1.27999 ORCHID DISTRIBUTION AND BIOCLIMATIC NICHES AS A STRATEGY TO CLIMATE CHANGE IN AREAS OF TROPICAL DRY FOREST IN COLOMBIA GUILLERMO A. REINA-RODRÍGUEZ1,3, JORGE E. RUBIANO MEJÍA2, FABIO A. CASTRO LLANOS2 & IGNASI SORIANO1 1 Department of Evolutionary Biology, Ecology and Environmental Sciences., University of Barcelona, Section of Botany and Mycology. Av. Diagonal 643. E-08028 Barcelona, Spain. C.P. 08028 2 Department of Geography, Valle University, Cali, Colombia. Av. Pasoancho 100-00, Cali, Colombia. 3 Author for correspondence: [email protected] ABSTRACT. Climate change projections in Colombia predict an average increase in temperature of 2.6°C and in precipitation of 20% by the end of the century. These changes would directly affect the tropical dry forest (TDF) and its biodiversity. Epiphytic orchids, more exposed to the atmosphere than the terrestrial biota, remain dependent on climatic variables, making them particularly susceptible to climate change. We studied the spatial and temporal changes of a focal group of 12 orchid species typical of the TDF in Colombia, and the future conservation areas to this ecosystem. The algorithm used by MaxEnt was employed for modelling. A total of 439 records: direct observations (276); herbaria collections (159) and bibliographical sources (4) collected since September 2009 to April 2015 were considered for use in training the model. The actual potential niche was compared to the SRES 8.5 climate change emissions scenario for two periods: 2020–2049 (2030) and 2040–2069 (2050). The results indicate an altitudinal displacement compared to the present, conditioned by variables such as temperature, accessibility and precipitation.
    [Show full text]
  • Rollins College Catalog Winter Term 1986 Rollins College
    Rollins College Rollins Scholarship Online College of Liberal Arts Catalogs College Catalogs Winter 1986 Rollins College Catalog Winter Term 1986 Rollins College Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.rollins.edu/catalogs_liberalarts Recommended Citation Rollins College, "Rollins College Catalog Winter Term 1986" (1986). College of Liberal Arts Catalogs. 69. https://scholarship.rollins.edu/catalogs_liberalarts/69 This Catalog is brought to you for free and open access by the College Catalogs at Rollins Scholarship Online. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Liberal Arts Catalogs by an authorized administrator of Rollins Scholarship Online. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WINTER TERM 1986 ROLLINS COLLEGE WINTER PARK, FLORIDA THE ROLLINS COLLEGE WINTER TERM Scholarly inquiry, creativity, experimentation, exploration all are fostered by the lively winter term curriculum of Rollins College. January offers faculty and students the opportunity to devote their energies to a single course or project. Students may choose: to delve into subjects they've never tried before to dance, act, or play an instrument for the first time to sharpen research skills in the library or the laboratory to explore unusual topics and unconventional ways of learning to put theory into practice through internships to undertake senior projects in preparation for graduate study to take courses involving travel to foreign countries or other regions of the United States to exchange places with students from other colleges and universities to study with visiting professors from universities abroad or from other American institutions. Adding to the vitality of the winter term are extracurricular activities including plays, films, concerts, special lectures and sporting events.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Cite Complete Issue More Information About This
    Lankesteriana ISSN: 1409-3871 Lankester Botanical Garden, University of Costa Rica Reina-Rodríguez, Guillermo A.; Rubiano Mejía, Jorge E.; Castro Llanos, Fabio A.; Soriano, Ignasi Orchid Distribution and Bioclimatic Niches as a Strategy to Climate Change in Areas Of Tropical Dry Forest In Colombia Lankesteriana, vol. 17, no. 1, 2017, pp. 17-47 Lankester Botanical Garden, University of Costa Rica DOI: https://doi.org/10.15517/lank.v17i1.27999 Available in: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44353205002 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System Redalyc More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Journal's webpage in redalyc.org Portugal Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative LANKESTERIANA 17(1): 17-47. 2017. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/lank.v17i1.27999 ORCHID DISTRIBUTION AND BIOCLIMATIC NICHES AS A STRATEGY TO CLIMATE CHANGE IN AREAS OF TROPICAL DRY FOREST IN COLOMBIA GUILLERMO A. REINA-RODRÍGUEZ1,3, JORGE E. RUBIANO MEJÍA2, FABIO A. CASTRO LLANOS2 & IGNASI SORIANO1 1 Department of Evolutionary Biology, Ecology and Environmental Sciences., University of Barcelona, Section of Botany and Mycology. Av. Diagonal 643. E-08028 Barcelona, Spain. C.P. 08028 2 Department of Geography, Valle University, Cali, Colombia. Av. Pasoancho 100-00, Cali, Colombia. 3 Author for correspondence: [email protected] ABSTRACT. Climate change projections in Colombia predict an average increase in temperature of 2.6°C and in precipitation of 20% by the end of the century. These changes would directly affect the tropical dry forest (TDF) and its biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Development Latin American and Caribbean Perspectives
    f Sustainable Development Latin American and Caribbean Perspectives Based on the Regional Consultative Meeting on Sustainable Development 19-21 January 2000, Santiago, Chile Sponsored by: Economic Commission for Latin American and the Caribbean United Nations Department for Economic and Social Affairs, The Organization of American States United Nations Development Programme The Inter-American Development Bank ECLAC 900041950 900041950 - BIBLIOTECA CEPAL Sustainable Development: Latin American and Caribbean Perspectives ii Contents Foreword ................. vii Abbreviations ......................................................... xiii Final Report Conclusions and Recommendations of the Regional Consultative Meeting on Sustainable Development in Latin America and the Caribbean ..................... 1 Section I Country Experiences in Implementing National Sustainable Development Strategies ..................................................................... 29 An Assessment of Antigua and Barbuda’s Sustainable Development Strategies .................................. 31 Preliminary Evaluation of the Implementation of Bolivia’s National Strategy for Sustainable Development..................................................... 45 Sustainable Development Strategies and Related Activities Currently in Place in Brazil ............................ 59 Chilean Government's Report on Sustainable Development .................................................. 71 Cuba in Search of Sustainable Development ............... 89 The Dominican Republic
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter Template
    Copyright by Lara M. Sánchez-Morales 2018 The Report Committee for Lara M. Sánchez-Morales Certifies that this is the approved version of the following Report: A Political Ecology approach to investigate the environmental impacts of cattle management in Puerto Rico, 16th to 19th centuries APPROVED BY SUPERVISING COMMITTEE: Arlene Rosen, Supervisor Maria Franklin Paola Schiappacasse A Political Ecology approach to investigate the environmental impacts of cattle management in Puerto Rico, 16th to 19th centuries by Lara M. Sánchez-Morales Report Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts The University of Texas at Austin May 2018 Dedication I dedicate this work to my home: Puerto Rico. To my father Félix Sánchez-Díaz and my mother Marilyn Morales-Font; because without them, I truly would not be here doing the things I love. To my brothers Leopoldo, Leoniv, and Diego because, one way or another, we are always together. To my tías, tíos y primos: my eternal cheerleaders, and to my grandmothers Isabel and Mary, for all the things they dreamed of doing that drove them to push me forward. I also dedicate this to my friends in Puerto Rico, Austin, and all over the world for their reminders that I “need a beer”. To my colleagues and friends in the Department of Anthropology: Carlisia, Kelsie, Ana María, Emmy, Nelson, Hannah, Qui’chi, Rachel, Krishanta, and Fatemeh, for making graduate school that much more inspiring. And finally, to my cats, Pepper and Volta, because they can’t escape my stress when the rest of you could! Acknowledgements I would like to thank Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Sint Maarten) Ramsar Information Sheet Published on 9 September 2016
    RIS for Site no. 2270, Mullet Pond, Netherlands (Sint Maarten) Ramsar Information Sheet Published on 9 September 2016 Netherlands (Sint Maarten) Mullet Pond Designation date 23 May 2014 Site number 2270 Coordinates 18°02'52"N 63°07'16"W Area 26,35 ha https://rsis.ramsar.org/ris/2270 Created by RSIS V.1.6 on - 20 July 2020 RIS for Site no. 2270, Mullet Pond, Netherlands (Sint Maarten) Color codes Fields back-shaded in light blue relate to data and information required only for RIS updates. Note that some fields concerning aspects of Part 3, the Ecological Character Description of the RIS (tinted in purple), are not expected to be completed as part of a standard RIS, but are included for completeness so as to provide the requested consistency between the RIS and the format of a ‘full’ Ecological Character Description, as adopted in Resolution X.15 (2008). If a Contracting Party does have information available that is relevant to these fields (for example from a national format Ecological Character Description) it may, if it wishes to, include information in these additional fields. 1 - Summary Summary The unique body of water called Mullet Bay Pond is a semi-enclosed area within the Simpson Bay Lagoon. Tragically, the Simpson Bay lagoon, once the largest enclosed lagoon in the North Eastern Caribbean, continues to be polluted and depleted. Increasingly large strands of Mangroves are still being removed and seagrass habitats have been eroded due to increased and uncontrolled development. Only approximately one fourth of the coastline of the Simpson Bay Lagoon is still populated by aquatic Red Mangrove trees.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting
    GENETIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR ACROPORID CORAL RESTORATION By KATHRYN ELAINE LOHR A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2018 © 2018 Kathryn Elaine Lohr To my family ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would first like to thank my advisor, Dr. Joshua Patterson for giving me the opportunity to complete my studies at UF. The guidance and mentorship he has provided over the past four years have been invaluable, and his advice and support have been deeply rewarding for my studies and my career. Sincere thanks also go to my supervisory committee members, Drs. Matt DiMaggio, Tom Frazer, Lyn Gettys, and Margaret Miller, for providing constructive advice and direction that have greatly improved the quality of my work. I would also like to thank Dr. Mark Flint for offering valuable early feedback on my work. My graduate research would not have been possible without the assistance of a number of individuals and institutions. First, I would like to thank the Tampa Electric Company for providing me with office space at the Florida Conservation and Technology Center during my time as a student. Chapters 2-4 of this dissertation would not have been possible without the Coral Restoration Foundation (CRF), who allowed me to conduct research involving their nursery and corals. Nursery-based studies were conducted under permit FKNMS-2011-159-A3 issued to CRF (Chapter 2), and permit FKNMS-2016-129-A1 issued to Dr. Joshua Patterson (Chapter 3). I would particularly like to thank Kayla Ripple for organizing field logistics throughout and for collaborating on Chapter 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.A Review of Neotropical Myxomycetes (1828-2008)
    Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid ISSN: 0211-1322 [email protected] Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas España Lado, Carlos; Wrigley de Basanta, Diana A Review of Neotropical Myxomycetes (1828-2008) Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid, vol. 65, núm. 2, julio-diciembre, 2008, pp. 211-254 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas Madrid, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=55611960004 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid Vol. 65(2): 211-254 julio-diciembre 2008 ISSN: 0211-1322 A Review of Neotropical Myxomycetes (1828-2008) by Carlos Lado & Diana Wrigley de Basanta Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Plaza de Murillo 2, 28014 Madrid, Spain. [email protected] Abstract Resumen Lado, C. & Wrigley de Basanta, D. 2008. A Review of Neotropi- Lado, C. & Wrigley de Basanta, D. 2008. Revisión de los My- cal Myxomycetes (1828-2008). Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid 65(2): xomycetes del Neotrópico (1828-2008). Anales Jard. Bot. Ma- 211-254. drid 65(2): 211-254 (en inglés). A synthesis of the accumulated knowledge on myxomycetes Se realiza una síntesis sobre el conocimiento actual de los My- recorded from the Neotropical region is presented in this paper. xomycetes en el Neotrópico. La biodiversidad de estos microor- The biodiversity of these microorganisms in the Neotropics has ganismos en la región neotropical ha sido subestimada, pero been underestimated, and this paper shows that half the known este trabajo demuestra que la mitad de las especies conocidas species in the world have been recorded from the region.
    [Show full text]
  • AN EMPIRICAL EVALUATION of Posidonia Australis (R
    AN EMPIRICAL EVALUATION OF Posidonia australis (R. Br.) Hook f. RESTORATION IN WESTERN AUSTRALIA: DEVELOPMENT OF A DECISION-BASED RESTORATION FRAMEWORK by Marnie Lyn Campbell This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Biological and Environmental Science Murdoch University, Western Australia. 2000 Declaration This dissertation is my own account of research I carried out from 1993 to 1999 and has not previously been submitted for the award of any degree at a tertiary institution. Marnie Lyn Campbell ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are a number of people and organisations that I would like to thank. Firstly, I wish to thank my supervisor, Dr Eric Paling, whose guidance has made this thesis what it is today. I would also like to thank my funding company Cockburn Cement Ltd, who made this project possible through a generous scholarship and the provision of valuable resources. At Cockburn Cement Ltd, I’m particularly indebted to Mr Roger Wilson, Mr Richard Peters, Mr Pieter Tencate, Eric, Alan and all the guys at the Woodman Point plant who helped to maintain the laboratory. I also wish to thank the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority for a grant, which was awarded to me in 1993. To the Royal Australian Navy Clearance Diving Team IV, I extend my thanks for the seagrass transplanting work they gladly helped by providing man and vessel power. Thanks to all my dive buddies, Ian, Troy, Jannette, Helen, Blair, Malcolm, Richard and Miriam, who’ve always been there no matter what the weather was like. To Troy Sinclair, special thanks for keeping the mesocosms going when I was in Tasmania.
    [Show full text]