Juliusz Tyszka

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Juliusz Tyszka Juliusz Tyszka ORANGE ALTERNATIVE: STREET HAPPENINGS AS SOCIAL PERFORMANCE IN POLAND UNDER MARTRIAL LAW An essay published in New Theatre Quarterly No. 56 (November 1998) The Orange Alternative, a unique artistic and political phenomenon, was at its prime in the period between Spring 1987 and Autumn 1988. Its manifestations-happenings were the common creation of their initiators-arrangers, and also: the young people of Wrocław, incidental passers-by in the centre of the city and, the functionaries of the state militia who were always very fast and keen to join the action. Before a detailed description of the Orange Alternative’s history, it is necessary to present its specific historical and local background. The “stormy 1980s” in Poland were a period of deep political crisis. They began with the great political breakthrough of the Summer of 1980. It had started with strikes in Lublin, followed by a general strike in Baltic Seaports, and finished with an agreement between the authorities and strikers, led by Lech Wałęsa, in the Gdańsk shipyard on August 31. The workers were supported and helped by the advisors coming from dissident intellectual milieux (The Committee of Defence of Workers, The Flying University and others), and catholic circles. The Gdańsk agreement included permission for the foundation of independent trade unions. In the next few days the Solidarity union was founded. Within the first month of its existence it already had 10 million members and had become a mass dissident movement. The 16 months of the “Solidarity carnival” gave the Polish people an opportunity to act and speak openly, as well as to try hard to build a democratic society. Party officials, continuously pressed by their Soviet comrades, could no longer tolerate the rapid process of destruction of the post-stalinist social and cultural order (the economical order remained untouched). It was clear that the 10 million strong social and political movement had to be stopped before it accelerated revolutionary actions. Therefore, Martial Law was imposed on the Polish people on December 13, 1981. General Wojciech Jaruzelski, the party leader, as well as prime minister of the government and commander-chief of the army, announced it himself on TV. The imposition of Martial Law was in fact a coup d’état performed by the wing of the communist party controlled by Jaruzelski and, above all, by the Polish army who took control of all institutions and gave the order to arrest all important Solidarity activists, including its president, Lech Wałęsa. Martial Law was suspended on December 31, 1982 and called off on July 22, 1983 (The National Holiday of People’s Poland) but many regulations imposed on December 13, 1981 were in force until the fall of the communist regime in the Spring of 1989. All political, artistic, scientific, regional, social, cultural and student associations, and institutions, as well as trade unions were suspended, including Solidarity, of course. The movement was finally officially dissolved in October 1982, after its refusal, declared by a great many of Solidarity's leaders, to collaborate 1 with Martial Law rulers. The censors started to act fervently in an attempt to wipe out all the concessions of the “Solidarity carnival”. After a hard struggle, which cost a few dozen people their lives, the activity of the Polish dissident milieux diminished in 1984-85. The illegal, clandestine Solidarity appeared to lose “Jaruzelski’s war”. People were already tired of constant fighting. The party propaganda announced triumphantly the coming of “normalization”. In 1986-87 the political, economical and moral stagnation reached its peak. The communist powers seemed strong enough to exist for decades, surrounded by the hate of a passive nation (Soviet perestroika changed neither the attitude of the Polish people towards the communist authorities and the USSR nor the tough regulations of Martial Law which were still in effect). However, the attitude of the communists towards the people started to change. The isolation of the Polish authorities, deepened by the tough attitude of the West (the Polish government owed Western banks more than 30 billion dollars), became painfully obvious, even to themselves. The communists gradually began to realize that it was impossible to exercise their absolute power against a passive but openly hostile nation, and Western creditors, without the strong support of their Soviet allies, who were weakened by the defeat in Afghanistan and perestroika. The state militia and ominous riot militia forces (ZOMO) gradually became more mild and indulgent, as did the censors, courts and state administration. The field of the action was ready for the coming of the Orange Alternative. The movement, led by Waldemar Fydrych (nicknamed Major), appeared in the city of Wrocław. It was somehow obvious that only this city could give birth to such an original attitude and activity. Wrocław, formerly the German Breslau, was the greatest “melting pot” of nations and cultures in Poland. Its population in the 1950s consisted mostly of people who just after the II World War had been deplaced from former Polish territories of Western Ukraine, Belorussia and Lithuania to former German territories of Lower Silesia. In the 1970s Wrocław became a vibrant cultural centre, deeply touched and changed by the creation of the Polish Laboratory Theatre of Jerzy Grotowski, the State Pantomime Theatre of Henryk Tomaszewski, the State Polish Theatre of Jerzy Grzegorzewski, the State Contemporary Theatre of Kazimierz Braun, the creations of another famous theatre director Helmut Kajzar, the great International Festival of Open Theatre, which had started in 1967), the presence of the great poet and plawright, Tadeusz Różewicz, the activity of monthly “Odra” and the milieu of fine artists. In the 1980s Wrocław, together with Gdańsk, was the most powerful centre of resistance against communist power. In 1982 and 1983 tens of thousands of Wrocław inhabitants regularly, at least once a month, participated in mass demonstrations and heavy street fights with riot militia. The clandestine Solidarity with its legendary regional leaders, Władysław Frasyniuk and Józef Pinior, had great support there. The leader of Orange Alternative, Waldemar Fydrych - Major (1953) was a graduate of Wrocław University, departments of History and History of Art. He took his nickname in the 1970s when he was pretending to be mentally handicaped in order to avoid compulsory military service after his studies. During one of his sessions with a psychiatrist Fydrych promoted the doctor to the rank of colonel 2 and made himself a major. “Then, when I had gone to the psychotherapeutic camp - recalls Fydrych - and lead the military manoeuvres there, I became Major for good”1. The original creation by Major started in the period of the “Solidarity carnival”. In April 1981 he was one of the organizers of the Wrocław Peace March, the only one in the part of Europe dominated by the USSR. He was also an activist of The Movement for New Culture, the only student organization in Poland with no strictly political program. Its founders were intending to promote a new paradigm of culture rather than the idea of Solidarity’s revolution. The M.N.C. became the forum of artistic opposition for Wrocław students and young intelligentsia, referring to the anarchistic aspects of Western counterculture from the 1960s. The intention of its creators was to expand its influence to workers and clerks. In October 1981 M.N.C. organized demonstration in the very centre of Wrocław. The most important slogans from the banners were: “Down with symetry!” and “Long life to free imagination”. A street demonstration itself was something extremely unusual at that time, and the content of the slogans deepened the surrealistic effect. Therefore, as Fydrych later stated, “people were associating this peculiar demonstration rather with happenings and street art than with real social problems” (21). Major was the editor of the movement’s ephemeral periodical “Orange Alternative”. Why orange? Its editors gave several explanations: orange is a mixture of red and yellow, the colour of an orange (oranges, as well as all exotic fruits, were almost impossible to buy in Poland at the time) and the colour of the rising sun which in India and China is a symbol of wisdom. In “Orange Alternative” Fydrych and his colleagues from M.N.C. were publishing surrealistic long-short stories, as well as slogans, manifestoes, and texts by Krishnamutri, and André Breton’s famous letter to rectors of European universities. The most original and popular slogan of that time was: “Proletarians - be beautiful!”. In autumn 1981, during a long strike of Polish academies, one of thousands of strikes organized in the period of the “Solidarity carnival”, Major arranged his first street happening. Every night the militia would take away posters left on the university walls by striking students. One night the student unit led by Major left the building and sang the Polish Birthday and Nameday song “Live for a Hundred Years” for the men of the militia. The following night they sang “The Internationale” and a few hundred photographs were taken as documentation of the action. The militia withdrew leaving the walls untouched. “We named the building of the Faculty of Philosophy Fort No. 1 - recalls Fydrych - organizing the work of our Revolutionary Staff and editing our periodical there. In Orange Alternative we were writing mostly about art but in that time it was first and foremost a political art” (8). Step by step Major’s ideas started to focus on the concept of “socialist surrealism”. “Everything is moving within deep feelings of surrealist imagination - he wrote in the first issue of “O.A.” - Socialism is good for fragmentary people who acquire a certain perfection in the lack of totality. Nothing can define it except for the magic of routine in the office.
Recommended publications
  • Presidency Cultural Programme in Kraków
    Presidency Cultural Programme in Kraków 2011-08-23 4th “Divine Comedy” International Theatre Festival December 2011 The Divine Comedy festival is not just a competition, but also an opportunity to see the top shows by young Polish directors and the chance to compare opinions of Polish theatre with critics from all over Europe. The selection of productions is made by the most prominent Polish critics, journalists, and reviewers, while the decision on who walks away with the figurine of the Divine Comedian is made by an independent international jury. The festival is divided into three blocks. In the Inferno section – the contest for the best Polish productions of the previous season – the maestros of Polish theatre and their students compete for the award. Paradiso is the section of the festival devoted to the work of young, but already acclaimed, directors. The Purgatorio block includes accompanying events. It should be emphasised that this year the festival has changed its formula – traditionally the competition section and culmination of accompanying events fall in December, while the international section takes place all year round – every month excluding the summer holidays. Organiser: Krakow Festival Office www.boskakomedia.pl Opera Rara: A. Vivaldi – L’Oracolo in Messenia 8 December 2011 December’s performance in the Opera Rara cycle perfectly achieves the goals set by originator Filip Berkowicz when he began the project in 2009 – to present above all works which are rarely played or which have been restored to the repertoire after centuries of absence in concert halls. This will be the world première of the opera written by Antonio Vivaldi in the last years of his life, published just after his death and then lost for a very long time.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012Wp07cosmos
    COSMOS WORKING PAPERS Grassroots Groups and Civil Society Actors in Pro-Democratic Transitions in Poland Grzegorz Piotrowski COSMOS WP 2012/7 COSMOS-Centre on social movement studies Mobilizing for Democracy – ERC Project Department of political and social sciences European University Institute This paper has been sponsored by the ERC Advanced Grant for the project Mobilizing for democracy. It can be do nloaded for personal research p!rposes only. Any additional reprod!ction for other p!rposes" whether in hard copy or electronically" re#!ires the consent of the a!thor$s%" editor$s%. If cited or q!oted" reference sho!ld be made to the f!ll name of the a!thor$s%" editor$s%" the title" the or&ing paper or other series" the year" and the p!blisher. E'R()EA* '*I+ER,IT- I*,TIT'TE" ./(RE*CE 0E)ARTME*T (F )(/ITICA/ A*0 ,(CIA/ ,CIE*CE, C(,M(, CE*TRE (F ,(CIA/ M(+EME*T ,T'0IE, 1M(2I/I3I*G .(R 0EM(CRAC-4 0EM(CRATI3ATI(* )R(CE,,E, A*0 T5E M(2I/I3ATI(* (F CI+I/ ,(CIET-6 )R(JECT E'R()EA* RE,EARC5 C('*CI/ $ERC% GRA*T Mobilizing for Democracy: Democratization Processes and the Mobilization of Civil Society The project addresses the role of civil society organizations (CSOs) in democratization processes, bridging social science approaches to social movements and democracy. The project starts by revisiting the “transitology” approach to democratization and the political process approach to social movements, before moving towards more innovative approaches in both areas. From the theoretical point of view, a main innovation will be in addressing both structural preconditions as well as actors’ strategies, looking at the intersection of structure and agency.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Antipolitics' to 'Anti-Politics': What Became of East European 'Civil Society'?
    Working Paper Series ISSN 1470-2320 2003 No. 03-41 FROM 'ANTIPOLITICS' TO 'ANTI-POLITICS': WHAT BECAME OF EAST EUROPEAN 'CIVIL SOCIETY'? Tessa Brannan Published: January 2003 Development Studies Institute London School of Economics and Political Science Houghton Street Tel: +44 (020) 7955-7425 London Fax: +44 (020) 7955-6844 WC2A 2AE UK Email: [email protected] Web site: www.lse.ac.uk/depts/destin The London School of Economics is a School of the University of London. It is a charity and is incorporated in England as a company limited by guarantee under the Companies Act (Reg. No. 70527). Contents Section 1 – Introduction: The Conceptual Travels of ‘Civil Society’ 1 - 7 • The Revival of an Historical Concept • ‘Civil Society’: Contested or Hegemonic Concept Section 2 – ‘Civil Society in the ‘Post-Totalitarian’ Context 8 - 19 • The ‘Post-Totalitarian’ Context • New Ideas: ‘Antipolitics’ and Morality • The Global Dimension • State – Civil Society Relationship • Emerging Civil Societies: Developments in Poland and Czechoslovakia Section 3 – The Rise and Fall of ‘Civil Society’ 20 - 30 • 1989: Civil Society Victorious? • Civil Society’s Untimely Demise • Communist Legacies & the Absence of Prerequisites • Postcommunist Realities • Civil Society: A Victim of its Own Success? • Implications i Section 4 – From ‘Antipolitics’ to ‘Anti-politics’ 31 - 40 • The Dilution of East European Civil Society • Antipolitics and the Depoliticisation of Civil Society • Intellectuals and the Elitism of Dissidence • ‘Antipolitics’, ‘Anti-politics’, and the Betrayal of the People Section 5 – Conclusions: Contesting Civil Society’s Hegemonic Discourse 41 - 43 Bibliography iii - ix ii Section 1 – Introduction : The Conceptual Travels of ‘Civil Society’ “Few social and political concepts have travelled so far in their life and changed their meaning so much,” (Pelczynski, 1988; p363).
    [Show full text]
  • Krzysztof Skiba Cultural Studies Specialization: Theatre Index Nr 58490/S
    Krzysztof Skiba Cultural Studies Specialization: Theatre Index nr 58490/S Happenings by the Orange Alternative An attempt to document the actions I dedicate this work to the Citizen Militia (MO) without participation of which, the Orange Alternative's happenings would not achieve the presented scope Master thesis written under supervision of Dr Sławomir Świontek, Institute of Theory of Film and Theatre Literature at the University of Łódź Chapter 1 ROOTS OF THE ORANGE ALTERNATIVE 1 The roots of the Orange Alternative reach to the year 1980 in which the Movement for New Culture [Ruch Nowej Kultury] was formed in the academic circles of Wrocław. The movers and shakers of the movement were two students of Wrocław's colleges: the University of Wrocław and the State Higher School of Plastic Arts [Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Sztuk Plastycznych]. Actions undertaken by the Movement for New Culture took a form of public happenings and, according to their organizers, were “an attempt to surmount a man's isolation in the industrial world”. 1 The action initiating the Movement's presence took place in the streets of Wrocław's Old Town in October 1980. The Movement's sympathizers organized a march-demonstration under a slogan “Away with symmetry, long live free imagination”. During the following action “Flower for a militiaman” 2 buckets of flowers were handed out to police patrols. In April 1981 the Movement for New Culture along with the Independent Student Union (Niezależny Związek Studentów or NZS], inspired by similar Easter marches taking place in Western Europe, undertook to organize a “Peace March”. However the march finally did not take place.
    [Show full text]
  • POLISH INDEPENDENT PUBLISHING, 1976-1989 a Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate Scho
    MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD: POLISH INDEPENDENT PUBLISHING, 1976-1989 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. By Siobhan K. Doucette, M.A. Washington, DC April 11, 2013 Copyright 2013 by Siobhan K. Doucette All Rights Reserved ii MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD: POLISH INDEPENDENT PUBLISHING, 1976-1989 Siobhan K. Doucette, M.A. Thesis Advisor: Andrzej S. Kamiński, Ph.D. ABSTRACT This dissertation analyzes the rapid growth of Polish independent publishing between 1976 and 1989, examining the ways in which publications were produced as well as their content. Widespread, long-lasting independent publishing efforts were first produced by individuals connected to the democratic opposition; particularly those associated with KOR and ROPCiO. Independent publishing expanded dramatically during the Solidarity-era when most publications were linked to Solidarity, Rural Solidarity or NZS. By the mid-1980s, independent publishing obtained new levels of pluralism and diversity as publications were produced through a bevy of independent social milieus across every segment of society. Between 1976 and 1989, thousands of independent titles were produced in Poland. Rather than employing samizdat printing techniques, independent publishers relied on printing machines which allowed for independent publication print-runs in the thousands and even tens of thousands, placing Polish independent publishing on an incomparably greater scale than in any other country in the Communist bloc. By breaking through social atomization and linking up individuals and milieus across class, geographic and political divides, independent publications became the backbone of the opposition; distribution networks provided the organizational structure for the Polish underground.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 254, Poland Questions Czechoslovakia/Poland Comparison in Poland, the Revolution Took Ten Years…Perhaps in Czechoslovakia I
    254, Poland Questions Czechoslovakia/Poland comparison In Poland, the revolution took ten years…perhaps in Czechoslovakia it will take ten days!” (Timothy Garton Ash). In Poland, we saw an immediate mass mobilization against the regime. There was a clear opposition party (Solidarity), a clear leader (Walesa) and clear demands that the Poles wanted to be met. Yet, it took ten years for them to completely achieve them. On the other hand, in the Czechoslovak chapter, there were a multitude of groups (artists, musicians, scholars) that acted out against the regime sometimes overtly and, at most times, subtly. When it came time to finally have the regime meet their demands, the Czechoslovaks did end up accomplishing their revolution in ten days. Is this to say that dissent is stronger at the pre-political level and at its infancy, is powerful enough to actually create the change we want instead of skipping to the last step and simply going out on the streets yelling our demands? Were the Czechoslovaks’ pens mightier than the Poles’ swords? I’ll use this question as a representative one on the Czechoslovakia/Poland comparison, and I’ll try to sum up succinctly how the situation in Czechoslovakia differed from the situation in Poland. We know that the culture of dissent in the former country was characterized by a small elite of intellectual dissidents while in the latter country we see a mass mobilization, and so we want to identify sociocultural factors that might explain the difference. These factors include: economic conditions; worker protests; the 1968 invasion; the Catholic Church; and differences between cultural spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Street Theater, Concrete Poetry
    © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. INTRODUCTION: STREET THEATER, CONCRETE POETRY UESDAY, February 16, 1988. It was Mardi Gras, the eve of the Lenten season. The weather in Poland was sunny and unseason- ably warm, with the temperature reaching the mid-60s in the T l southeastern city of Wroc aw. It was a perfect occasion for a traditional Rio de Janeiro–style carnival, smoothly transposed into a communist set- ting: a “ProletaRIO Carnival” (Karnawa¬ RIObotniczy), in fact. The crowd that gathered around the clock on S´widnicka Street in the center of this city of six hundred thousand was estimated to be three to five thousand. “Let’s make our city outshine Las Vegas,” read the flyer posted on the streets and distributed in high schools and colleges. “Dress for a party. This time the police won’t touch us. We’ll say a magic word and either they’ll disappear, or they’ll join the carnival.”1 Even the deejays on pop- ular Radio Three called on their Wroclaw listeners to join in the fun— until the authorities realized whose carnival it was and rescinded the invitation. Thus began another “happening,” called into being (not to say “orga- nized”) by the Orange Alternative. The guru of this guerrilla street-theater collective, 34-year-old Waldemar “Major” Fydrych, couldn’t make it: The police detained him and his orange-highway-cone megaphone as he ap- proached the crowd.
    [Show full text]
  • The Solidarity Collection of Polish Clandestine Publications at the British Library
    Z Badań nad Książką i Księgozbiorami Historycznymi 2020, t. 14, z. 4 The Studies into the History of the Book and Book Collections 2020, vol. 14, no. 4 www.bookhistory.uw.edu.pl http://doi.org/10.33077/uw.25448730.zbkh Zuzanna Krzemień Curator East European Languages, British Library [email protected] 0000-0001-8554-6747 The Solidarity Collection of Polish Clandestine Publications at the British Library Abstract: This article describes the history and content of the British Library’s Solidarity Collection of Polish clandestine publications. Over the past forty years, the British Library’s curators have collected Polish samizdat publications as valuable documents attesting to the struggle for freedom of speech faced with prevalent censorship. Although named after the Solidarity movement, the collection encompasses clandestine publications and ephemera from the 1970s until the end of the communist rule in Poland. A big part of the repository are donations of items smuggled to the West during the Cold War period. As of today, the collection includes 1759 books, 831 periodical titles and 548 ephemeral publications, encompassing various materials, from political posters and pamphlets to flying university lectures and postcards. Keywords: Solidarity, samizdat, dissent, Polish Collections abroad, Polonica, British Library, grey literature, underground publications. Słowa kluczowe: Solidarność, drugi obieg, Polonica, British Library, szara literatura, wydawnictwa podziemne. „Z Badań nad Książką i Księgozbiorami Historycznymi” – Udział zagranicznych recenzentów w ocenie publikacji; Stworzenie anglojęzycznej wersji wydawniczej publikacji; Digitalizacja tomów archiwalnych rocznika w celu zapewnienia otwartego dostępu do nich przez Internet oraz wdrożenie i utrzymanie cyfrowej platformy redakcyjnej – zadanie finansowane w ramach umowy nr 653/P-DUN/2019 ze środków Ministra Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.
    [Show full text]
  • The Organic Revolution Grass-Roots Activism in Eastern Europe, 1998, Five Papers
    TITLE: THE ORGANIC REVOLUTION : GRASS-ROOTS ACTIVISM I N EASTERN EUROPE, 1985-1989 . Five Papers AUTHOR : PADRAIC KENNEY, University of Colorad o THE NATIONAL COUNCI L FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARC H TITL E VIII PROGRAM 1755 Massachusetts Avenue, N .W . Washington, D .C . 20036 PROJECT INFORMATION : 1 CONTRACTOR : University of Colorad o PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR : Padraic Kenne y COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 811-24 DATE : February 24, 199 8 COPYRIGHT INFORMATIO N Individual researchers retain the copyright on their work products derived from researc h funded by contract from the National Council for Soviet and East European Research . However, the Council and the United States Government have the right to duplicate an d disseminate, in written and electronic form, this Report submitted to the Council under thi s Contract, as follows: Such dissemination may be made by the Council solely (a) for its ow n internal use, and (b) to the United States Government (1) for its own internal use ; (2) for further dissemination to domestic, international and foreign governments, entities an d individuals to serve official United States Government purposes ; and (3) for dissemination i n accordance with the Freedom of Information Act or other law or policy of the United State s Government granting the public rights of access to documents held by the United State s Government. Neither the Council, nor the United States Government, nor any recipient o f this Report by reason of such dissemination, may use this Report for commercial sale . ' The work leading to this report was supported in part by contract or grantfunds provided by the Nationa l Councilfor Soviet and East European Research, made available by the U.
    [Show full text]
  • An Independent Artistic Movement in the Last Decade of Communistic System in Poland
    West Bohemian Historical Review X | 2020 | 1 An Independent Artistic Movement in the Last Decade of Communistic System in Poland Agnieszka Gralińska-Toborek* Introduction Artistic culture in Poland after World War II, as in other countries of the Eastern Block, was subjected to strict censorship and remained either in the service of official propaganda or stayed out of the sphere of politics, remaining in the neutral theme of everyday life or autotelic modernist narrative. Over a period of more than 40 years, stylistic and thematic transformations were like changes in Western culture, however those changes were rather a result of political events than the contact with the West. The “Polish Thaw” after Stalin’s death brought the end to the doctrine of socialist realism, and the artistic community gained some autonomy and opportunity to explore formal innovations and avant-garde experiments. However, this autonomy of art in the aesthetic sphere, did not mean institutional and administrative independence nor did it mean freedom of expression. Artists were associated in unions, e.g. the Association of Polish Writers (ZLP) or the Association of Polish Artists (ZPAP), which were not only labour unions, but above all they exercised control over artistic life in Poland.1 The union authorities were selected from artists devoted to the communist regime, who tried to recruit secret collaborators among the members who would denounce their colleagues. The unions provided the artists with social assistance, * Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy and History, University of Lodz, Poland; e-mail: [email protected]. 1 Research on secret archives of the Security Service is ongoing quite intensively in Poland.
    [Show full text]
  • Pray the Devil WP
    LESSON TITLE: Peaceful Protests GRADES: 9-12 TIME ALLOTMENT: Three to four 45-minute class periods OVERVIEW Students learn about nonviolent resistance movements that have taken place around the world and, using segments from the PBS program Women, War & Peace: “Pray the Devil Back to Hell” explore how women’s nonviolent protests helped bring about the end of a bloody civil war in Liberia in 2003. In the Introductory Activity, students learn about nonviolent resistance, conduct research about nonviolent protest leaders in different countries and time periods, discuss the goals and impact of their actions, and place them on a timeline. In Learning Activity 1, students learn about actions that Leymah Gbowee and the women of Liberia took to protest the civil war in their country. In Learning Activity 2, students explore different methods of nonviolent action and read and discuss the letter Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. wrote from jail in Birmingham, Alabama, as well as the statement from Alabama clergymen which prompted him to write the letter. In the Culminating Activity, students examine nonviolent protest movements throughout history and discuss the goals and impact of those efforts. The lesson concludes with students writing and discussing reflection essays about the use of nonviolent resistance, citing examples studied in this lesson. OBJECTIVES Students will be able to: o Define “nonviolent resistance” and “civil disobedience.” o Discuss who Leymah Gbowee is and what her role was in ending Liberia’s Civil War in 2003. o Describe nonviolent actions the women of Liberia took to protest the war. o Name at least three leaders of nonviolent protests around the world and discuss the goals and impact of their actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards the Modern Alternative Theatre in Poland – Selected Issues
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Dariusz Leśnikowski Department of Drama and Theatre University of Łódź Towards the Modern Alternative Theatre in Poland – Selected Issues 1. Introduction The World War II resulted in many losses in Polish theatre circles. After the war the most important task was to reactivate and revive theatre activity in the whole country, to reconstruct theatre buildings, to edu- cate a new generation of actors and directors who would be able to meet the requirements of the new political, cultural and demographic situation of the country. In 1949 the principles of socialist realism were officially established as obligatory for Polish theatre, which effectively restricted artistic freedom of theatre creators. The fear of being accused of formalism significantly discouraged experiments with theatre form, while the fear of being sus- pected of cosmopolitanism deprived the repertoire of original productions and unique interpretations of the world drama. Many pre-war creators and young creative artists found it difficult to work within the imposed convention. Nationalisation of Polish stage which took place at that time resulted in a centralised system of theatre management. The state decree of 1946 introduced an institution of preventive censorship supervised by political and state authorities. Dogmatic restrictions of Socialist Realism, i.e. Exclu- sion of Polish classical literature from the repertoire, especially the works 274 Dariusz Leśnikowski of Polish Romanticism, and endorsement of immature and weak ‘proletar- ian’ plays on stage, made the audience lose interest and trust in the theatre as a form of art.
    [Show full text]