Contemplating Convivencia: Cosmopolitanism, Exclusivism and Religious Identity in Iberia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Contemplating Convivencia: Cosmopolitanism, Exclusivism and Religious Identity in Iberia Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Religious Studies Theses Department of Religious Studies Summer 8-7-2012 Contemplating Convivencia: Cosmopolitanism, Exclusivism and Religious Identity in Iberia John F. Sullivan II Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/rs_theses Recommended Citation Sullivan, John F. II, "Contemplating Convivencia: Cosmopolitanism, Exclusivism and Religious Identity in Iberia." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2012. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/rs_theses/43 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Religious Studies at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Religious Studies Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CONTEMPLATING CONVIVENCIA: COSMOPOLITANISM, EXCLUSIVISM AND RELIGIOUS IDENTITY IN IBERIA by JOHN FRANCIS SULLIVAN II Under the Direction of Louis A. Ruprecht Jr. ABSTRACT Visigothic Hispania, Islamicate al-Andalus and Christian Spain are names representing three scriptural monotheistic civilizations in Iberia. Al-Andalus has stood apart from this list by representing a time and a place of convivencia in which Christians, Jews and Muslims cooperated and coexisted. Why and how the Islamicate civilization in al-Andalus differed from the Visigoths or the Spanish, despite all three sharing a religious orientation is an historical puzzle. By exploring the legal status of Jews within the legal regimes of Christian Rome and Visigothic Hispania, this thesis will suggest that it is cosmopolitanism and its converse exclusivism that best explain concepts of convivencia or coexistence in the face of religious diversity. INDEX WORDS: Convivencia, Iberia, Islam, Muslim, Spain, Cosmopolitanism, Jew, Christian, Roman, Visigoth, Exclusivism, Law, Theodosius, Constantine, Diogenes, Cosmopolitan CONTEMPLATING CONVIVENCIA: COSMOPOLITANISM, EXCLUSIVISM AND RELIGIOUS IDENTITY IN IBERIA by JOHN FRANCIS SULLIVAN II A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the College of Arts and Sciences Georgia State University 2012 Copyright by John F. Sullivan II 2012 CONTEMPLATING CONVIVENCIA: COSMOPOLITANISM, EXCLUSIVISM AND RELIGIOUS IDENTITY IN IBERIA by JOHN FRANCIS SULLIVAN II Committee Chair: Louis A. Ruprecht Jr. Committee: Abbas Barzegar Isaac Weiner Electronic Version Approved: Office of Graduate Studies College of Arts and Sciences Georgia State University August 2012 iv DEDICATION For Lou, strength and honor. v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many thanks to my committee members, Louis A. Ruprecht Jr., Abbas Barzegar and Isaac Weiner for their myriad of invaluable contributions to this project over the years. This thesis could also not have been completed without the feedback and encouragement of colleagues Sarah Levine, Suzanne Tryon, Kenny Smith, Heather Abraham, Nicholas Newell and Kathryn Yates. I would also like to acknowledge the excellent work of Georgia State University’s Interlibrary Loan staff that was consistently able to locate and obtain obscure materials. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................... v 1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................... 1 What’s in a name? ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Engaging Iberia .................................................................................................................... 2 1.1.1 Temporal Bookends and the Iberian Difference ............................................................. 3 1.1.2 In the year 1492… .......................................................................................................... 4 1.1.3 Peoples and a Peninsula ................................................................................................. 5 1.1.4 Imperial Identities ........................................................................................................... 7 1.1.5 Dominant Categories of Imperial Identity .................................................................... 11 1.2 Cosmopolitanism, Exclusivism and Identity ...................................................................... 13 1.3 Cosmopolitanism ................................................................................................................. 16 1.3.1 A Citizen of the World ................................................................................................... 18 1.3.2 What hath Diogenes wrought? ...................................................................................... 21 1.3.3 A Cosmopolitan Empire ................................................................................................ 22 1.4 Exclusivism ......................................................................................................................... 24 1.5 Exclusivism and Scriptural Monotheism ........................................................................... 25 1.5.1 The Jews ........................................................................................................................ 25 1.5.2 Christians ...................................................................................................................... 27 1.5.3 Muslims ......................................................................................................................... 28 1.5.4 Cosmopolitanism and Exclusivism at Work .................................................................. 29 vii 1.5.5 Cosmopolitan Monotheism ........................................................................................... 30 1.6 A Tale of Two Romes .......................................................................................................... 31 1.6.1 Constantine ................................................................................................................... 32 1.6.2 Theodosius .................................................................................................................... 33 2 VISIGOTHIC HISPANIA (419-711 CE) ................................................................................ 36 2.1.1 What is a Visigoth? ....................................................................................................... 38 2.2 Visigothic Hispania, Stage One: From Roman to Visigoth .............................................. 39 2.2.1 The Temporal Bookends of Visigothic Hispania ........................................................... 39 2.2.2 From Roman Hispania to Visigothic Hispania ............................................................. 40 2.2.3 Policing Borders: The Jews and the Codex Theodosianus ........................................... 41 2.3 Visigothic Hispania and the Lex Romana Visigothorum .................................................. 47 2.3.1 Lex Romana Visigothorum ............................................................................................ 48 2.4 Stage II: Visigothic to Nicene Visigothic ........................................................................... 53 2.4.1 The Third Council of Toledo and The Nicene Visigoths. .............................................. 54 2.4.2 An Impossible Dream .................................................................................................... 57 2.4.3 The Sixth Council of Toldeo .......................................................................................... 59 2.4.4 The Jews and the Lex Visigothorum ............................................................................. 61 2.5 Conclusions ......................................................................................................................... 78 2.6 Epilogue ............................................................................................................................... 80 2.6.1 Scope of the Project ...................................................................................................... 80 2.6.2 Islamicate Al-Andalus ................................................................................................... 82 viii 2.6.3 Christian Spain ............................................................................................................. 84 2.6.4 Contemplating Convivencia .......................................................................................... 85 BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................................ 86 1 1 INTRODUCTION Medieval Iberia (c. 711 CE – 1492 CE) is often upheld as a model of social organization by contemporary scholars who privilege terms such as coexistence or convivencia. Such terms are designed to foreground the categories of tolerance and intolerance as they may have been reflected within the regimes that ruled in that place and time. In this thesis, I will explore Iberia, not in terms of tolerance or intolerance, but by using a different set of variables in order to highlight what may be a more broadly applicable and ultimately more illuminating picture of what actually emerged. My starting point will be a close study of the legal regimes and their response to religious minorities, specifically
Recommended publications
  • Biblical Faith and Other Religions: an Evangelical Assessment
    Scholars Crossing SOR Faculty Publications and Presentations 2007 Review: Biblical Faith and Other Religions: An Evangelical Assessment Michael S. Jones Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/sor_fac_pubs Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Comparative Methodologies and Theories Commons, Epistemology Commons, Esthetics Commons, Ethics in Religion Commons, History of Philosophy Commons, History of Religions of Eastern Origins Commons, History of Religions of Western Origin Commons, Other Philosophy Commons, Other Religion Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Jones, Michael S., "Review: Biblical Faith and Other Religions: An Evangelical Assessment" (2007). SOR Faculty Publications and Presentations. 170. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/sor_fac_pubs/170 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in SOR Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BOOK REVIEWS 479 discussion of the "big questions," and publication of the second edition of this important work reminds us again of Hick's enonnous influence upon religious studies and philosophy of religion. One need not be persuaded by his pluralistic hypothesis to appreciate his impact in shaping the discussions over religious diversity. REVIEWED BY HAROLD N ULAND TRINITY EVANGELICAL DIVINITY SCHOOL Biblical Faith and Other Religions: An Evangelical Assessment. Edited by David W. Baker. Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel, 2004. 176 pages. $12.99. Biblical Faith and Other Religions is, as the subtitle states, an evangeli­ cal consideration of what is often called "the problem of religions pluralism." It is a multi author work, the contents of which are a result ofthe annual meet­ ing of the Evangelical Theological Society in Toronto in 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Achila, Visigothic King, 34 Acisclus, Córdoban Martyr, 158 Adams
    Index ; Achila, Visigothic king, 34 Almodóvar del Río, Spain, 123–24 Acisclus, Córdoban martyr, 158 Almonacid de la Cuba, Spain, 150. See Adams, Robert, 21 also Dams Aemilian, St., 160 Alonso de la Sierra, Juan, 97 Aerial photography, 40, 82 Amalaric, Visigothic king, 29–30, 132, Aetius, Roman general, 173–75 157 Africa, 4, 21–23; and amphorae, 116, Amber, 114 137, 187, 196; and ARS, 46, 56, 90, Ammianus Marcellinus, Roman histo- 99, 187; and Byzantine reconquest, rian, 166, 168 30; and ‹shing, 103; and olive oil, Amphorae, 43, 80, 199–200; exported 88, 188; and Roman army, 114, 127, from Spain, 44, 97–98, 113, 115–16, 166; and trade, 105, 141; and Van- 172; kilns, 61–62, 87–90, 184; from dals, 27–28, 97, 127, 174 North Africa, 129, 187. See also African Red Slip (ARS) pottery, 101, Kilns 147, 186–87, 191, 197; de‹nition, 41, Anderson, Perry, 5 43, 44, 46; and site survival, 90, Andujar, Spain, 38, 47, 63 92–95, 98–99; and trade, 105–6, 110, Annales, 8, 12, 39 114, 116, 129, 183 Annona: disruption by Vandals, 97, Agde, council of, 29, 36, 41 174; to Roman army, 44, 81, 114–17; Agglomeration, 40–42, 59, 92 to Rome, 23, 27, 44, 81, 113; under Agila, Visigothic king, 158–59. See Ostrogoths, 29, 133. See also Army also Athanagild Antioch, Syria, 126 Agrippa, Roman general, 118 Anti-Semitism, 12, 33. See also Jews Alans, 24, 26, 27, 34, 126, 175 Antonine Itinerary, 152 Alaric, Visigothic king, 2, 5, 26–27 Apuleius, Roman writer, 75–76, 122 Alaric II, Visigothic king, 29–30 Aqueducts, 119, 130, 134, 174–75 Alcalá del Río, Spain, 40, 44, 93, 123, Aquitaine, France, 2, 27, 45, 102 148 Arabs, 33–34, 132–33, 137.
    [Show full text]
  • Ordering Divine Knowledge in Late Roman Legal Discourse
    Caroline Humfress ordering.3 More particularly, I will argue that the designation and arrangement of the title-rubrics within Book XVI of the Codex Theodosianus was intended to showcase a new, imperial and Theodosian, ordering of knowledge concerning matters human and divine. König and Whitmarsh’s 2007 edited volume, Ordering Knowledge in the Roman Empire is concerned primarily with the first three centuries of the Roman empire Ordering Divine Knowledge in and does not include any extended discussion of how knowledge was ordered and structured in Roman juristic or Imperial legal texts.4 Yet if we classify the Late Roman Legal Discourse Codex Theodosianus as a specialist form of Imperial prose literature, rather than Caroline Humfress classifying it initially as a ‘lawcode’, the text fits neatly within König and Whitmarsh’s description of their project: University of St Andrews Our principal interest is in texts that follow a broadly ‘compilatory’ aesthetic, accumulating information in often enormous bulk, in ways that may look unwieldy or purely functional In the celebrated words of the Severan jurist Ulpian – echoed three hundred years to modern eyes, but which in the ancient world clearly had a much higher prestige later in the opening passages of Justinian’s Institutes – knowledge of the law entails that modern criticism has allowed them. The prevalence of this mode of composition knowledge of matters both human and divine. This essay explores how relations in the Roman world is astonishing… It is sometimes hard to avoid the impression that between the human and divine were structured and ordered in the Imperial codex accumulation of knowledge is the driving force for all of Imperial prose literature.5 of Theodosius II (438 CE).
    [Show full text]
  • En Torno a La Moneda Visigoda About Visighotic Coinage
    DOCUMENTA & INSTRUMENTA, 1 (2004), PP. 179-201 _______________________________________________________________________________ EN TORNO A LA MONEDA VISIGODA ABOUT VISIGHOTIC COINAGE MARÍA RUIZ TRAPERO Universidad Complutense de Madrid Resumen: En este artículo se intenta contribuir a través de la investigación de fuentes monetarias al conocimiento actual de la moneda visigoda. Se parte de las series monetarias emitidas en Hispania de patrón ponderal romano de base duodecimal, ajustado a la reforma constantiniana acuñadas por los visigodos durante la Edad Media, con organización jurídico-administrativa también romana y con tipos montéales que incluso nacen de la imitación del arte imperial. Imitación seguida desde Leovigildo por todos sus sucesores hasta el final de sus emisiones, al establecer la moneda propiamente nacional sobre la base de las provincias romanas. Palabras clave: Investigación numismática, fuentes de información histórica. Abstract: This article tries to contribute to the knowledge of visighotic coinage, through monetary sources. The beginning are the coins that were coined in Hispania by Visigoths; these were of roman system, fit to reform of Constantine. Its juridical-administrative organisation is also roman and its types born of imitation of imperial art. This imitation is followed to Leovigild, when the properly national coinage is established on the base of Roman provinces. Keywords: Numismatic investigation, sources of historic information. Las emisiones visigodas son emisiones hispánicas y su moneda es documento vivo de su historia que desde Leovigildo define, sin apartarse del patrón ponderal y del sistema romano al que pertenecen; reflejo de ese nuevo Estado, a la romana, sí, pero jurídicamente independiente, con personalidad política propia. Leovigildo aprovecha la impronta de sus monedas para transmitir y propagar, a través de un proceso perfectamente programado, su profundo sentido político.
    [Show full text]
  • Evangelical Responses to the Question of Religious Pluralism By
    Evangelical Responses to the Question of Religious Pluralism By Cecily May Worsfold A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts In Religious Studies Victoria University of Wellington 2011 ABSTRACT The relatively recent rise of religious pluralism has significantly affected the evangelical movement, the roots of which are traceable to the sixteenth century Reformation. In particular, the theological implications of religious pluralism have led to debate concerning the nature of core beliefs of evangelicalism and how these should be interpreted in the contemporary world. While evangelicals continue to articulate a genuine undergirding desire to “honour the authority of Scripture”, differing frameworks and ideals have led to a certain level of fracturing between schools of evangelical thought. This research focuses on the work of three evangelical theologians – Harold Netland, John Sanders and Clark Pinnock – and their responses to the question of religious pluralism. In assessing the ideas put forward in their major work relevant to religious pluralism this thesis reveals something of the contestation and diversity within the evangelical tradition. The authors' respective theological opinions demonstrate that there is basic agreement on some doctrines. Others are being revisited, however, in the search for answers to the tension between two notions that evangelicals commonly affirm: the eternal destiny of the unevangelised; and the will of God that all humankind should obtain salvation. Evangelicals are deeply divided on this matter, and the problem of containing seemingly incompatible views within the confines of “evangelical belief” remains. This ongoing division highlights the difficulty of defining evangelicalism in purely theological terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Moral Implications of Darwinian Evolution for Human Reference
    Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Dissertations Graduate Research 2006 Moral Implications of Darwinian Evolution for Human Reference Based in Christian Ethics: a Critical Analysis and Response to the "Moral Individualism" of James Rachels Stephen Bauer Andrews University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations Part of the Christianity Commons, Ethics in Religion Commons, Evolution Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Bauer, Stephen, "Moral Implications of Darwinian Evolution for Human Reference Based in Christian Ethics: a Critical Analysis and Response to the "Moral Individualism" of James Rachels" (2006). Dissertations. 16. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/16 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Thank you for your interest in the Andrews University Digital Library of Dissertations and Theses. Please honor the copyright of this document by not duplicating or distributing additional copies in any form without the author’s express written permission. Thanks for your cooperation. Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary MORAL IMPLICATIONS OF DARWINIAN EVOLUTION FOR HUMAN PREFERENCE BASED IN CHRISTIAN ETHICS: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS AND RESPONSE TO THE “MORAL INDIVIDUALISM” OF JAMES RACHELS A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy by Stephen Bauer November 2006 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 3248152 Copyright 2006 by Bauer, Stephen All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Satisfaction of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO PUBLIC CATHOLICISM AND RELIGIOUS PLURALISM IN AMERICA: THE ADAPTATION OF A RELIGIOUS CULTURE TO THE CIRCUMSTANCE OF DIVERSITY, AND ITS IMPLICATIONS A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology by Michael J. Agliardo, SJ Committee in charge: Professor Richard Madsen, Chair Professor John H. Evans Professor David Pellow Professor Joel Robbins Professor Gershon Shafir 2008 Copyright Michael J. Agliardo, SJ, 2008 All rights reserved. The Dissertation of Michael Joseph Agliardo is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Chair University of California, San Diego 2008 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page ......................................................................................................................... iii Table of Contents......................................................................................................................iv List Abbreviations and Acronyms ............................................................................................vi List of Graphs ......................................................................................................................... vii Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................. viii Vita.............................................................................................................................................x
    [Show full text]
  • The Reality of Moral Imperatives in Liberal Religion
    University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law 1-23-2013 The Reality of Moral Imperatives in Liberal Religion Howard Lesnick University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, Ethics in Religion Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Law and Society Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons, and the Religion Law Commons Repository Citation Lesnick, Howard, "The Reality of Moral Imperatives in Liberal Religion" (2013). Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law. 339. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/339 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law by an authorized administrator of Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE REALITY OF MORAL IMPERATIVES IN LIBERAL RELIGION HOWARD LESNICK Fordham Professor of Law University of Pennsylvania Abstract This paper uses a classic one-liner attributed to Dostoyoevski’s Ivan Karamozov, "Without God everything is permitted," to explore some differences between what I term traditional and liberal religion. The expansive connotations and implications of Ivan’s words are grounded in the historic association of wrongfulness and punishment, and in a reaction against the late modern challenge to the inexorability of that association, whether in liberal religion or in secular moral thought. The paper argues that, with its full import understood, Ivan’s claim begs critical questions of the meaning and source of compulsion and choice, and of knowledge and belief regarding the specific content of religiously grounded moral norms.
    [Show full text]
  • The Edictum Theoderici: a Study of a Roman Legal Document from Ostrogothic Italy
    The Edictum Theoderici: A Study of a Roman Legal Document from Ostrogothic Italy By Sean D.W. Lafferty A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Toronto © Copyright by Sean D.W. Lafferty 2010 The Edictum Theoderici: A Study of a Roman Legal Document from Ostrogothic Italy Sean D.W. Lafferty Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Toronto 2010 Abstract This is a study of a Roman legal document of unknown date and debated origin conventionally known as the Edictum Theoderici (ET). Comprised of 154 edicta, or provisions, in addition to a prologue and epilogue, the ET is a significant but largely overlooked document for understanding the institutions of Roman law, legal administration and society in the West from the fourth to early sixth century. The purpose is to situate the text within its proper historical and legal context, to understand better the processes involved in the creation of new law in the post-Roman world, as well as to appreciate how the various social, political and cultural changes associated with the end of the classical world and the beginning of the Middle Ages manifested themselves in the domain of Roman law. It is argued here that the ET was produced by a group of unknown Roman jurisprudents working under the instructions of the Ostrogothic king Theoderic the Great (493-526), and was intended as a guide for settling disputes between the Roman and Ostrogothic inhabitants of Italy. A study of its contents in relation to earlier Roman law and legal custom preserved in imperial decrees and juristic commentaries offers a revealing glimpse into how, and to what extent, Roman law survived and evolved in Italy following the decline and eventual collapse of imperial authority in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    ISIT 2.2 (2018) 261–267 Interreligious Studies and Intercultural Theology (print) ISSN 2397-3471 https://doi.org/10.1558/isit.37330 Interreligious Studies and Intercultural Theology (online) ISSN 2397-348X BOOK REVIEW Religion and Extremism: Rejecting Diversity, by Douglas Pratt. Bloomsbury Aca- demic, 2018. 196 pp., Pb., $29.95 ISBN 978-14-74-29225-2 Reviewed by Ian Mevorach, Boston University, [email protected] The twenty-first century has seen a disturbing rise in violent and aggressive religious extremism. Why? In Religion and Extremism: Rejecting Diversity Douglas Pratt seeks to answer this question by analysing contemporary examples of religious extremism in the Jewish, Christian, and Muslim traditions. Pratt’s survey of these extremes corrects biased notions that practitioners of any one of these traditions are more prone to hate speech, aggressive exclusion of religious others, violence, or even terrorism. For example, in Chapter 9, “Extremism and Islamophobia,” Pratt makes the case that efforts to cast Islam as essentially prone to extremism and terrorism are part and parcel of the Western world’s Islamophobia, which is itself driven largely by Christian religious extremism (this is one example of a dynamic Pratt describes as “co-radicalization”). Pratt’s research indicates relatively equal possibilities for extremes of exclusivism and violence in all three Abrahamic faiths (and, presumably, others, though his research is limited to Judaism, Christianity, and Islam). Fundamentalist versions of these faiths, which reject religious diversity, are more likely to harbour and encourage extremist attitudes and behaviours. Religions which reject religious others also tend to reject other forms of human diversity (race, culture, sexuality, political ideology, etc.); when their influence grows, religious extremists lead their societies down “a path to closed, fascist insularity” (vii).
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Context of Religion and Spirituality in the United States
    C HA P TER 2 THE SOciaL CONTEXT OF ReLIGION AND SpiRITUALITY IN THE UNITED STATes Christopher G. Ellison and Michael J. McFarland Since the dissemination of the classic theoretical religion and in which religious groups compete for treatises of Marx, Durkheim, and Weber, sociologists— members and other resources (Warner, 1993). and many other social scientists—have widely Although some scholars employed such concepts assumed that the forces of modernity would erode loosely, others drew more heavily on economic the social power of religion. In the prevailing secu- approaches, notably “rational choice” perspectives larization narrative, processes such as social differ- (Stark & Finke, 2001). entiation and rationalization would prompt a retreat In the 21st century, contrary to the expectations of religion from the public sphere, resulting in reli- of some variants of secularization theory, the gious privatism and eventual decline (Tschannen, United States is regarded as one of the most reli- 1991). Such ideas dominated the sociological land- gious societies in the industrial West. Although eco- scape for most of the 20th century, and seculariza- nomic development and national wealth are tion theory continues to have its defenders (e.g., inversely related to religiousness throughout much Chaves, 1994), especially among many European of the world, the United States remains a stubborn sociologists (e.g., Bruce, 2002). Beginning in the late outlier (Norris & Inglehart, 2004). In contrast to 1980s, however, notions of secularization came widespread popular and scholarly understandings under harsh scrutiny by a growing number of U.S. of the nation’s founding, it is now believed that sociologists who were increasingly skeptical about much of the United States was relatively irreligious the relevance of this perspective to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Return to Judaism
    The R eturn to Judaism Descendants from the Inquisition Discovering Their Jewish Roots Sandra Cumings Malamed The Return to Judaism Descendants from the Inquisition Discovering Their Jewish Roots Sandra Cumings Malamed 2010 · Fithian Press, McKinleyville, California cover illustrations Manasseh ben Israel, portrait by Rembrandt van Rijn. Eighteenth-century print from the collection of Sandra and Kenneth Malamed. Photographed for production by Laird M. Malamed. Passover Haggadah, two-page spread, printed in Holland. From the collection of Sandra and Kenneth Malamed. Photographed for production by Laird M. Malamed. Auto da fé or burning at the stake. Illustration courtesy of the Department of Special Collections, University of Notre Dame. Photographed for production by Laird M. Malamed. Copyright © 2010 by Sandra Cumings Malamed All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America The interior design and the cover design of this book are intended for and limited to the publisher’s first print edition of the book and related marketing display purposes. All other use of those designs without the publisher’s permission is prohibited. Published by Fithian Press A division of Daniel and Daniel, Publishers, Inc. Post Office Box 2790 McKinleyville, CA 95519 www.danielpublishing.com Distributed by SCB Distributors (800) 729-6423 library of congress cataloging-in-publication data Malamed, Sandra Cumings, (date) The return to Judaism : descendants from the Inquisition discovering their Jewish roots / by Sandra Cumings Malamed. p. cm. ISBN 978-1-56474-504-0 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Marranos—History. 2 Marranos—Interviews. 3. Marranos—Social life and customs. 4. Jews—Spain—History. 5. Jews—Portugal—History.
    [Show full text]