DOCSLIB.ORG

Flixton Park Quarry, Flixton, Suffolk FLN 088 and FLN 090 Assessment 3B (Volume I; Text, Figures and Plates)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Flixton Park Quarry, Flixton, Suffolk FLN 088 and FLN 090 Assessment 3B (Volume I; Text, Figures and Plates) Flixton Park Quarry, Flixton, Suffolk FLN 088 and FLN 090 Assessment 3b (Volume I; Text, Figures and Plates) Post-Excavation Assessment Report SCCAS Report No. 2013/099 Client: Cemex (UK) Materials Ltd. Principal Author: Stuart Boulter February/2015 © Suffolk County Council Archaeological Service and © Suffolk Archaeology CIC Flixton Park Quarry, Flixton, Suffolk FLN 088 and FLN 090 Assessment 3b Post-Excavation Assessment Report SCCAS Report No. 2013/099 Principal Author: Stuart Boulter Contributions By: Sue Anderson, Sarah Bates, John Crowther, Julie Curl, Val Fryer, Richenda Goffin, Sarah Percival, Ian Riddler, Alison Sheriden, Cathy Tester Illustrators: Stuart Boulter, Linzi Everett Editor: Rhodri Gardner Report Date: February/2015 HER Information Site Code: FLN 088 and FLN 090 Site Name: Flixton Park Quarry, Flixton, Suffolk Report Number 2013/099 Planning Application No: W/10999/10 Date of Fieldwork: 2009 - 2011 Grid Reference: TM 3075 8680 Oasis Reference: suffolkc1-154978 Curatorial Officer: Edward Martin (superseded by Dr. Matt Brudenell) Senior Project Officer: Stuart Boulter Client/Funding Body: Cemex (UK) Materials Ltd. Client Reference: N/A Digital report submitted to Archaeological Data Service: http://ads.ahds.ac.uk/catalogue/library/greylit Disclaimer Any opinions expressed in this report about the need for further archaeological work are those of the Field Projects Team alone. Ultimately the need for further work will be determined by the Local Planning Authority and its Archaeological Advisors when a planning application is registered. Suffolk County Council’s archaeological contracting services cannot accept responsibility for inconvenience caused to the clients should the Planning Authority take a different view to that expressed in the report. Prepared By: Stuart Boulter Date: February 2015 Approved By: Rhodri Gardner Position: Contracts Manager Date: February 2015 Signed: …………………….. Contents Summary 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Site location 1 1.2 The scope of the project 1 1.3 Circumstances and dates of fieldwork 2 2 Geological, topographic and archaeological background 4 2.1 Geology, topography and recent land use 4 2.2 Archaeological background 4 3 Original research aims 7 4 Site sequence: results of the fieldwork 10 4.1 Introduction 10 4.2 Prehistoric 12 4.2.1 Period/Phase I.a. (Palaeolithic) 12 4.2.2 Period/Phase I.c. (Early Neolithic) 14 4.2.3 Period/Phase I.d. (Late Neolithic) 15 4.2.4 Period/Phase I.e. (Early Bronze Age) 15 4.2.5 Period/Phase I.g. and I.h. (Late Bronze Age and Early Iron Age) 38 4.2.6 Period/Phase I.0. (prehistoric unspecified date) 60 4.3 Post-medieval 60 4.3.1 Period/Phase V.b. (post-medieval, 17th – 19th centuries) 60 4.3.2 Period/Phases V.d. (post-medieval, 20th century) 63 4.4 Undated 63 4.4.1 Period/Phases 0 (undated) 63 5 Quantification and assessment 69 5.1 Post-excavation review 69 5.2 Quantification of the stratigraphic archive 69 5.3 Quantification and assessment of the bulk finds archive 70 5.3.1 Introduction 70 5.3.2 Pottery 70 5.3.3 Ceramic building material (CBM) 75 5.3.4 Fired clay 78 5.3.5 Worked flint 79 5.3.6 Heat-altered stone 90 5.4 Quantification and assessment of the small finds archive 92 5.4.1 Introduction 92 5.4.2 Methodology 92 5.4.3 Small finds by period 93 5.5 Quantification and assessment of the environmental evidence 112 5.5.1 Human skeletal remains 112 5.5.2 Animal bone 113 5.5.3 Charred plant macrofossils and other remains 115 6 Significance of the data and potential for analysis 126 6.1 Realisation of the Original Research Aims 126 6.2 The potential and significance of the stratigraphic data 127 6.2.1 Introduction 127 6.2.2 Period/Phase I.a. (Palaeolithic) 128 6.2.3 Period/Phase I.c. (Early Neolithic) 128 6.2.4 Period/Phase I.d. (Late Neolithic) 128 6.2.5 Period/Phase I.e. (Early Bronze Age) 129 6.2.6 Period/Phase I.g. and I.h. (Late Bronze Age and Early Iron Age) 129 6.2.7 Period/Phases I.0. (prehistoric unspecified date) 130 6.2.8 Period/Phases V.b. (post-medieval, 17th – 19th centuries) 130 6.2.9 Period/Phases V.b. (post-medieval, 20th century) 130 6.2.10 Period/Phases 0 (undated) 130 6.3 The potential and significance of the finds data 131 6.3.1 Introduction 131 6.3.2 Pottery 131 6.3.3 CBM 132 6.3.4 Fired clay 132 6.3.5 Worked Flint 133 6.3.6 Heat-altered stone 133 6.3.7 Small finds 134 6.4 The potential and significance of the environmental evidence 137 6.4.1 Human skeletal remains 137 6.4.2 Animal bone 137 6.4.3 Charred plant macrofossils and other remains 138 7 Updated research aims and task list 140 7.1 Introduction 140 7.2 Updated research aims 140 7.3 Stratigraphic analysis; required tasks 140 7.4 Bulk finds and small finds analysis; required tasks 141 7.4.1 Prehistoric pottery 141 7.4.2 CBM 142 7.4.3 Fired clay 142 7.4.4 Worked flint 142 7.4.5 Heat-altered stone 143 7.4.6 Small finds 143 7.5 Environmental evidence 144 7.5.1 Human skeletal remains 144 7.5.2 Animal bone 145 7.5.3 Plant macrofossils and other remains 145 8 Publication strategy 146 9 Analysis and publication; resources/programming 147 9.1 Staff for analysis and publication 147 9.2 Task list 147 9.3 Archive deposition 148 10 Acknowledgements 149 11 Bibliography 150 List of Figures Figure 1. Site Location 3 Figure 2. Flixton Quarry all features (sites 088 and 090 bounded in red) 8 Figure 3. 088 and 090 all features plan 9 Figure 4. 088 and 090; Period/Phase I.c. (Early Neolithic) 13 Figure 5. 088 and 090; Period/Phase I.e. (Early Bronze Age) 16 Figure 6. Monument 088:0065 17 Figure 7. Composite monument 088:0789/0788/0821/0856/0809; plan 21 Figure 8. Composite monument 088:0789/0788/0821/0856; section (S20) 23 Figure 9. Grave 088:0809; sections 28 Figure 10. Grave 088:0809; detailed plan 29 Figure 11. Ring-ditches 090:0020 and 090:0102 34 Figure 12. 088 and 090; Period/Phase I.g/I.h. (Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age) 37 Figure 13. Roundhouse 088:0502; plan 41 Figure 14. Roundhouse 088:0559; plan 42 Figure 15. Roundhouse 088:0610; plan 44 Figure 16. Roundhouse 088:1096; plan 45 Figure 17. Roundhouse 090:0414; plan 49 Figure 18. Four and six post structures (G1); plan 51 Figure 19. Four and six post structures (G2); plan 52 Figure 20. Four post structures (G3); plan 53 Figure 21. Miscellaneous structure 088:1095; plan 55 Figure 22. 088 and 090; Period/Phase I.0 (prehistoric unspecified date) 59 Figure 23. 088 and 090; Period/Phase V.b. (post-medieval, 17th – 19th centuries) 61 Figure 24. 088 and 090; Period/Phase V.d. (post-medieval, 20th century) 64 Figure 25. 088 and 090; Period/Phase 0. (undated) 65 Figure 26. Wristguard SF 088:1008; actual size 95 Figure 27. Scanning electron microscope images: 96 A) Encrusted sediment (x 5) B) Plant fibre attaching to sediment on top of the wristguard (x 200) C) Sandy sediment in transverse borehole (x 20) D) Partly-cleaned borehole showing traces of rilling (x 20) Figure. 28. SF 088:1009; X-ray and drawing (actual size) 101 Figure. 29. SF 088:1010; X-ray and drawing (actual size) 101 List of Tables Table 1. Provisional site phasing 12 Table 2. Quantification of the stratigraphic archive 69 Table 3. Finds quantities 70 Table 4. Quantity and weight of prehistoric pottery by site and date 70 Table 5. Earlier Neolithic pottery 71 Table 6. Quantity and weight of PDR pottery by feature 75 Table 7. CBM quantities by site 75 Table 8. CBM fabric descriptions and quantities (sherd count) by form 76 Table 9. CBM by feature with spotdates 77 Table 10. Fired clay quantities by site 78 Table 11. Fired clay fabrics and quantities 78 Table 12. Summary of the flint by type from 088 80 Table 13. Flint by context type from 088 86 Table 14. Summary of the flint by type from 090 87 Table 15. Flint by context type from 090 90 Table 16. Heat altered flint and other stone quantities by site areas 90 Table 17. Heat-altered stone distribution by feature type (both 088 and 090) 92 Table 18. Small finds by material type by site 92 Table 19. Breakdown of loomweights by site 105 Table 20. Loomweight catalogue for site 088 107 Table 21. Loomweight catalogue for site 090 109 Table 22. Faunal remains quantification by site, feature type and weight 114 Table 23. Faunal remains quantification by site, feature type and fragment count 114 Table 24. Faunal remains quantification by site, species and NISP 114 Table 25. Faunal remains quantification by feature type, species and NISP 115 Table 26. Samples from monument 088:0065 118 Table 27. Samples from monument 088:0788/0789/0856/0821/0809 120 Table 28. Site 088, samples from Early Neolithic pits 121 Table 29. Site 088, samples from Late Bronze Age pits 122 Table 30. Site 088, samples from other Late Bronze Age features 123 Table 31. Site 090, all samples 125 List of Plates Plate 1. Post-hole circle 088:0065 and cremation pit 088:0113 18 Plate 2. Cremation pit 088:0113 18 Plate 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Peterboroughcaav2 New2017.Indd
    PETERBOROUGH CITY CENTRE CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL & MANAGEMENT PLAN July 2017 3 © Beacon Planning Ltd 2017 This document has been prepared in accordance with the scope of Beacon Planning Limited’s appointment with its client and is subject to the terms of that appointment. It is addressed to and for the sole and confidential use and reliance of Beacon Planning Limited’s client. Beacon Planning Limited accepts no liability for any use of this document other than by its client and only for the purposes for which it was prepared and provided. No person other than the client may copy (in whole or in part) use or rely on the contents of this document, without the prior written permission of the Company Secretary of Beacon Planning Limited. Any advice, opinions, or recommendations within this document should be read and relied upon only in the context of the document as a whole. Beacon Planning Ltd 8 Quy Court, Colliers Lane Stow-cum-Quy CAMBRIDGE CB25 9AU T 01223 810990 www.beaconplanning.co.uk 4 CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Summary of Special Interest 2 3.0 Planning Policy Context: Conservation Areas 3 4.0 Assessment of Special Interest 5 Context & Setting 5 Topography & Landscape 5 History & Archaeology 6 City landmarks 13 Building materials and types 14 Public realm 17 Key views and vistas 18 Contribution of trees and open spaces 19 Key uses 20 5.0 Character Areas 23 Character Area 1: Bridge Street and Long Causeway 25 Character Area 2: Cowgate 31 Character Area 3: Priestgate 35 Character Area 4: Westgate 39 Character Area 5: Cathedral
    [Show full text]
  • To Rutland Record 21-30
    Rutland Record Index of numbers 21-30 Compiled by Robert Ovens Rutland Local History & Record Society The Society is formed from the union in June 1991 of the Rutland Local History Society, founded in the 1930s, and the Rutland Record Society, founded in 1979. In May 1993, the Rutland Field Research Group for Archaeology & History, founded in 1971, also amalgamated with the Society. The Society is a Registered Charity, and its aim is the advancement of the education of the public in all aspects of the history of the ancient County of Rutland and its immediate area. Registered Charity No. 700723 The main contents of Rutland Record 21-30 are listed below. Each issue apart from RR25 also contains annual reports from local societies, museums, record offices and archaeological organisations as well as an Editorial. For details of the Society’s other publications and how to order, please see inside the back cover. Rutland Record 21 (£2.50, members £2.00) ISBN 978 0 907464 31 9 Letters of Mary Barker (1655-79); A Rutland association for Anton Kammel; Uppingham by the Sea – Excursion to Borth 1875-77; Rutland Record 22 (£2.50, members £2.00) ISBN 978 0 907464 32 7 Obituary – Prince Yuri Galitzine; Returns of Rutland Registration Districts to 1851 Religious Census; Churchyard at Exton Rutland Record 23 (£2.50, members £2.00) ISBN 978 0 907464 33 4 Hoard of Roman coins from Tinwell; Medieval Park of Ridlington;* Major-General Lord Ranksborough (1852-1921); Rutland churches in the Notitia Parochialis 1705; John Strecche, Prior of Brooke 1407-25
    [Show full text]
  • The Pagan Religions of the Ancient British Isles
    www.RodnoVery.ru www.RodnoVery.ru The Pagan Religions of the Ancient British Isles www.RodnoVery.ru Callanish Stone Circle Reproduced by kind permission of Fay Godwin www.RodnoVery.ru The Pagan Religions of the Ancient British Isles Their Nature and Legacy RONALD HUTTON BLACKWELL Oxford UK & Cambridge USA www.RodnoVery.ru Copyright © R. B. Hutton, 1991, 1993 First published 1991 First published in paperback 1993 Reprinted 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998 Blackwell Publishers Ltd 108 Cowley Road Oxford 0X4 1JF, UK Blackwell Publishers Inc. 350 Main Street Maiden, Massachusetts 02148, USA All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purposes of criticism and review, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Except in the United States of America, this book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, re-sold, hired out, or otherwise circulated without the publisher's prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Hutton, Ronald The pagan religions of the ancient British Isles: their nature and legacy / Ronald Hutton p. cm. ISBN 0-631-18946-7 (pbk) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Report1082
    Post-Excavation The Archaeology of Brigg’s Farm, Prior’s Fen, Thorney, Peterborough Post-Excavation Assessment Assessmen March 2009 Client: P.J.Thory Ltd OA East Report No: 1082 OASIS No: oxfordar3-56412 NGR: TL 2505 0070 t The Archaeology of Brigg's Farm, Prior's Fen, Thorney, Peterborough Post-excavation Assessment and Updated Project Design By Alexandra Pickstone BA AIfA & Richard Mortimer MIfA With contributions by Michael Bamforth MA AIfA, Barry Bishop MA, Natasha Dodwell MA, Chris Faine MA MSc, Elizabeth Huckerby BA, Rachel Fosberry HNC (Cert Ed), Mark Knight BA, Dr. Rob Law, Peter Masters BA and Dr. Elaine Morris Editor: Richard Mortimer MIfA Illustrator: Louise Bush MA PIfA Report Date: March 2009 © Oxford Archaeology East Page 1 of 114 Report Number 1082 Table of Contents Summary.........................................................................................................................................7 1 Introduction................................................................................................................................8 1.1Project Background........................................................................................................8 1.2Geology and Topography ..............................................................................................8 1.3Archaeological and Historical Background....................................................................8 1.4Acknowledgements.......................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Raunds2 SS5-8
    SS5 The Neolithic and early Bronze Age archaeology of the Raunds area investigated by geophysical survey Andrew Payne SS5.1 Introduction Additional geophysical surveys carried out by the AML on a variety of other sites in Extensive tracts of the Raunds area were the the Raunds area (including several enclosure subject of geophysical surveys conducted complexes on the higher Boulder Clay- throughout the 1980s and 1990s by a variety capped ground to the east of the Nene valley) of organisations for various reasons and for a will be reported on elsewhere. These sites number of separate projects, all falling within are of suspected Iron Age to Roman date the overall auspices of the Raunds Area Pro- and belong more appropriately in separate ject or Raunds Parish Project. The majority publications on the later prehistoric and of the excavation carried out in the area by Roman archaeology of the Raunds area and the Central Excavation, Northamptonshire the Raunds Area Survey volume (Parry Archaeology and Oxfordshire Archaeological forthcoming). Units was threat-led in advance of gravel The surveys reported on here are those extraction and road construction in the that were carried out by the AML in the Nene Valley corridor from Irthlingborough 1990s on sites which contain major in the south-west of the area to Thrapston in Neolithic and early Bronze Age archaeology the north-east. A number of Roman villas, or monuments. Some of the sites have been monument complexes and multi-period complicated by later activity – such as the archaeological sites were affected by this remains of the deserted Saxon and medieval development and were therefore the subject settlement at West Cotton – but have never- of archaeological excavation in advance of theless been included on the basis that they their complete or partial destruction.
    [Show full text]
  • SMA 1993.Pdf
    c SOUTH MIDLANDS ARCHAEOLOGY The Newsletter of the Council for British Archaeology, South Midlands Group (Bedfordshire, Buckinghamshire, Northamptonshire, Oxfordshire) NUMBER 23, 1993 CONTENTS Page Spring Conference 1993 1 Bedfordshire 3 Buckinghamshire 33 Northamptonshire 40 Oxfordsh ire 59 Index 89 EDITOR: Andrew Pike CHAIRMAN: Dr Richard Ivens Bucks County Museum Milton Keynes Archaeology Unit Technical Centre, Tring Road, 16 Erica Road Halton, Aylesbury, HP22 5PJ Stacey Bushes Milton Keynes MK12 6PA HON SEC: Vacant TREASURER: Barry Home 'Beaumont', Church End, Edlesborough, Dunstable, Beds. LU6 2EP Typeset by Barry Home Printed by Central Printing Section, Bucks County Council ISSN 0960-7552 SPRING CONFERENCE 1993 preservation is now developing and Tom Hassall sees the CBA as the 'glue' for all the archaeological amateurs, in the CBA South Midland Groups Conference was held this year true sense of the word, and as a body to heighten public at Leighton Buzzard on the theme of professional and awareness of current planning issues by education and amateur archaeologists. A summary of the various papers is publicity. given below. He outlined CBA's activities: Peter Jarvis, Bletchley Park Trust: Recent Developments at Bletchley Park Education (Schools Committee and Young Archaeologists Club). Peter Jarvis' illustrated talk covered both the history of Bletchley Park's role in World War II and the efforts of the Influences funding of aerial photography. Trust to preserve and interpret as much of the site as Archaeological Science Committee. possible. The buildings which grew up around Leon's Churches Committee. Mansion became, in Winston Churchill's words, 'His little Countryside Committee. goose that laid the golden eggs'.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Raunds in the Region
    5 Raunds in the Region There’s nothing else so fine to see there was a ubiquitous thin scatter of struck As a fast flowing river flint, within which there were areas of higher Hemm’d by green banks continually density, but no clearly defined ‘sites’ (Figs And winding on for ever 1.4, 5.1). The areas of higher density were invariably on the light, permeable soils John Clare, A Ramble by the River Side formed on the Jurassic deposits exposed in the sides of the valleys of the Nene and its 5.1 The wider Raunds tributaries and, in the south-east of the landscape survey area, of the river Till, rather than on the largely Boulder Clay-covered interfluves. The immediate context of the Raunds The lithics of the alluviated valley floor monuments is provided by the analysis of remain unknown beyond the excavated over 10,000 pieces of struck flint collected areas. Within the suite of deposits in the during the Raunds Area Survey over the area valley sides (Fig 1.3), the Northampton shown in Figure 1.2 (Humble 2006; Parry Sand with Ironstone was particularly well 2006). Wherever fieldwalking was possible, used, comprising three per cent of the area Figure 5.1 Distribution of all struck flint found during field- walking survey. Unwalked areas are shown in grey. The watercourses and areas of water are modern ones, included to help locate the image in the landscape. 264 CEREMONIAL PRACTICE AND MORTUARY RITUAL walked but yielding ten per cent of the total finished implements of Early Neolithic char­ lithic collection, and a higher still proportion acter (Fig 5.4), especially along the Cotton of finished implements.
    [Show full text]
  • Pattern and Process Landscape Prehistories from Whittlesey Brick Pits: the King’S Dyke & Bradley Fen Excavations 1998–2004
    McDONALD INSTITUTEINSTITUTE MONOGRAPHSMONOGRAPHS Pattern and Process Landscape prehistories from Whittlesey Brick Pits: the King’s Dyke & Bradley Fen excavations 1998–2004 Mark Knight and Matt Brudenell CAU Must Farm/Flag Fen Basin Depth & Time Series — Volume I Pattern and process McDONALD INSTITUTE MONOGRAPHS Pattern and process Landscape prehistories from Whittlesey Brick Pits: the King’s Dyke & Bradley Fen excavations 1998–2004 By Mark Knight and Matt Brudenell With contributions by Grahame Appleby, Manuel Arroyo-Kalin, Rachel Ballantyne, Michael Bamforth, Lawrence Billington, Steve Boreham, Natasha Dodwell, Roger Doonan, Charles French, Kevin Hayward, Peter Hommel, Donald Horne, Mark Noel, Peter Northover, Tracey Pierre, Vida Rajkovača, Iona Robinson Zeki, Rob Scaife, Maisie Taylor, Sean Taylor, Simon Timberlake, Anne de Vareilles and Penelope Walton Rogers Principal illustrations by Andrew Hall CAU Must Farm/Flag Fen Basin Depth & Time Series — Volume I Published by: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research University of Cambridge Downing Street Cambridge, UK CB2 3ER (0)(1223) 339327 [email protected] www.mcdonald.cam.ac.uk McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 2020 © 2020 McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research. Pattern and process is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 (International) Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ISBN: 978-1-902937-97-7 Cover design by Dora Kemp, Andrew Hall and Ben Plumridge. Typesetting and layout by Ben Plumridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Oxfordshire Anglo-Saxon Cemeteries: Berinsfield and Didcot By
    Two Oxfordshire Anglo-Saxon Cemeteries: Berinsfield and Didcot Index by Peter B Gunn References in italics denote figures and tables. There may be textual references on these pages. Aalden, Holland: brooch 81-2 Grave No. 125 55-6 Abbey Mills, Didcot 201 Grave No. 128 56 Abingdon Abbey 204 Grave No. 129 56-7 Abingdon, Oxon , Grave No. 135 58 Abingdon I Grave No. 136 58 amber beads 91 Grave No. 141 59 bone beads 225 Grave No. 149 59-60, 100 dating of graves 142 Grave No. 150 60 early Germanic burials 138 infants 110, 111 early settlement 142, 242 Grave No. 2 29, 86, 92 faience beads 97 Grave No. 13 32 metal-in-glass beads 96 Grave No. 19 33 spearheads 222 Grave No. 37 38 weapon burials 68, 69, 73 Grave No. 64 45, 75, 76, 81 age /sex distribution of deaths 108,108 Grave No. 68 46 Corporation Farm: prehistoric finds 13 Grave No. 74 47 pin finds 89 Grave No. 78 48 pottery 231 Grave No. 103 51 Roman settlement 208 Grave No. 118 54-5 soils 4 Grave No. 150 60 wooden grave structure 121 satellite burial F97 11 see also Ashville; Barton Court Farm neonatal 16 aerial photography Grave No. 38 38 and Didcot 242 see also gender structure land patterns 208 age structure (Didcot) xvi, 211, 233, 238 Mount Farm 27 and knives 222 Roman enclosures 111 and status 242 Roman evidence 14, 16, 26 child burials 224, 239 Wally Corner cropmarks 4, 6,7,7 Grave No. 6 214 aes (coin) 16 Grave No.
    [Show full text]