DOCSLIB.ORG

Transport Now in the Future

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transport Now in the Future EMBARGOED UNTIL FRIDAY 14 FEBRUARY 2020, 6:00AM TRANSPORT NOW AND IN THE FUTURE TRANSPORT COMMITTEE February 2020 EMBARGOED UNTIL FRIDAY 14 FEBRUARY 2020, 6:00AM EMBARGOED UNTIL FRIDAY 14 FEBRUARY 2020, 6:00AM About the Transport Committee About the Transport TRANSPORT COMMITTEE Navin Shah AM Florence Eshalomi (Chair) MP AM Labour Labour Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM (Deputy Chair) Liberal Democrat Gareth Bacon MP AM Conservative The Transport Committee holds the Mayor and Transport for London to account for their work delivering the capital’s transport network. The committee examines all aspects of the transport network and presses for improvements on behalf of Londoners. CONTACT Daniel Tattersall, Policy Advisor [email protected] Tel: 020 8039 1328 Follow us @LondonAssembly #AssemblyTransport facebook.com/london.assembly EMBARGOED UNTIL FRIDAY 14 FEBRUARY 2020, 6:00AM Introduction Introduction INTRODUCTION London is constantly evolving, and the way that people move around the city is evolving as well. The city’s population is growing, and people’s work, leisure and retail patterns are changing. Enabling active travel and public transport use is key if essential Mayoral ambitions to reduce emissions and improve health are to be met. Yet we already know that public transport isn’t always providing the best service for Londoners. In a public survey, the London Assembly’s Transport Committee found that over half of people think public transport in London is too crowded, four in ten people find it too hot or humid, and nearly a quarter think it is too expensive.1 Furthermore, as work patterns have become more irregular, with increased numbers of people working from home and working outside of the usual nine-to-five hours, many passengers are finding that season ticket options no longer reflect their needs and don’t provide savings for frequent travel.2 The Transport Committee wanted to find out what would improve people’s experiences of moving around the capital, how people’s movement patterns around the city will change in the future and what should be prioritised in the city’s transport infrastructure to respond to this, and understand how these changes could be delivered. Through two hearings and a call for evidence we engaged with individual Londoners and a broad range of stakeholders including transport consumer groups, taxi companies and drivers’ unions, charities, delivery companies, infrastructure providers, and London borough councils. The five key findings presented in this piece are drawn out of this public engagement and represent the issues that we heard about repeatedly from different perspectives and often with a variety of solutions proposed. EMBARGOED UNTIL FRIDAY 14 FEBRUARY 2020, 6:00AM Electric Vehicles & Charging Infrastructure & Charging Electric Vehicles KEY FINDING More certainty over electric vehicle charging infrastructure is required to aid the switch away from petrol and diesel vehicles, but at the same time every effort should be made to provide viable transport alternatives in order to reduce the total number of vehicles on London’s roads. Electric vehicles have a which is not renewable.4,5 which 323 were rapid role to play in the future Electric vehicles also take charging points.8,9 This is of London’s transport, up the same amount of within the boundaries of and the number of space as other vehicles the number of chargers electric vehicles on and therefore do nothing required by London, London’s roads continues to ease congestion.6 as projected by the to rise. However, The Mayor’s Transport Mayor’s London Electric concerns over electric Strategy recognises Vehicle Infrastructure vehicles in the responses that a purely car-based Delivery Plan. However, to our call for evidence approach to transport, the range of expected echoed those expressed even if electric, will current demand is very previously by the not address London’s broad (“between 230 to London Assembly’s current and future 700 rapid chargers and Environment Committee.3 transport constraints. 3,400 to 8,000 residential slow to fast chargers”). Firstly, although they are Secondly, there is Projected demand for a preferable alternative to concern that electric 2025 is similarly broad petrol or diesel vehicles, vehicle charging (between 1,400 to electric vehicles still have infrastructure is not 4,100 rapid and 20,000 negative impacts on keeping pace with the to 48,000 residential health. They still present rise in electric vehicle slow to fast chargers), the same physical danger numbers for both and the plan itself notes to road users as other personal and commercial that a more accurate cars. Although they have use, and a lack of understanding of how no exhaust emissions, certainty over future many more chargers are there continues to be infrastructure provision required needs to be an impact on air quality could hinder the switch gained.10 If electric vehicle through the emission of from petrol and diesel to use is to be seamless particulate matter from electric vehicles.7 As of for owners, attention road, tyre and brake wear November 2019, there also needs to be paid and from the energy that were 4,360 charging to the harmonisation of they consume, much of points in London, of the numerous different EMBARGOED UNTIL FRIDAY 14 FEBRUARY 2020, 6:00AM Electric Vehicles & Charging Infrastructure & Charging Electric Vehicles charging networks in provision, these types of significant potential to London, which currently companies require more provide electric vehicle require different apps, clarity over how booking infrastructure, support subscriptions to separate mechanisms would work, from Government will membership schemes so that complex delivery also be required.16 and can incur different patterns, for example, can costs.11 It is also essential be configured for pedestrians that this around guaranteed growth in charging points recharging points.13,14 does not negatively impact pavement The Mayor’s London space or safety, and Electric Vehicle the placement of the Infrastructure Delivery required chargers will Plan recognises that need to be Mayoral powers to carefully planned.12 mandate infrastructure development in this The uncertainty over area are limited. The charger provision is plan states that charger being felt particularly points would largely keenly by companies – be delivered by the such as taxi and delivery private sector.15 TfL companies – that would noted in its response like to make the switch to to the Committee’s call electric fleets. In addition for evidence that for to certainty over future London to deliver on its RECOMMENDATION The Mayor and TfL should continue to lobby Government for more clarity over Government support for electric vehicle infrastructure in London, work to support harmonisation of charging networks in London, and demonstrate to the Transport Committee by 5 March 2020 how this will fit alongside an overall plan to reduce the number of vehicles on London’s roads. EMBARGOED UNTIL FRIDAY 14 FEBRUARY 2020, 6:00AM A Devolved Suburban Rail Service Suburban A Devolved KEY FINDING A metro-style devolved suburban rail service continues to be a high priority for Londoners. The Transport Committee trains, better run services, current complicated has previously safer and more accessible franchising model,26 it is highlighted the numerous stations, mayoral control imperative that the Mayor issues experienced by of fares and better and TfL continue to passengers on London’s integration with the lobby the Department for franchised train network. rest of the London Transport for devolution Overcrowding, a lack transport system.20 of suburban services of reliability, expensive from Southeastern, South fares, and infrequent and Throughout our Western Railway, Great irregular services have investigation we heard Northern and Southern all led to a decline in how important this franchises. The Williams passenger satisfaction.17 issue continues to be Rail Review – a ‘root and to Londoners. A wide branch’ review of Britain’s The London Assembly, range of respondents, railways established the Mayor and TfL including a rail passenger to assess whether the have long agreed advocacy group,21 a rail system is delivering that the devolution of thinktank,22 a London for passengers’ and these suburban rail borough council23 and taxpayers’ interests27 – franchises to TfL could rail infrastructure and has considered issues be the solution.18,19 As service providers24,25 all of franchising and the Committee has told us that they expect a devolution. The review previously highlighted, devolved suburban metro was due to be published rail devolution to create system to be a part of in Autumn 2019, and the a metro-style service London’s future transport Mayor and TfL should has the potential to system. Given that the lobby the Government to bring significant benefits Conservative Government publish this urgently. to Londoners through committed in its 2019 bigger and more regular manifesto to end the RECOMMENDATION The Mayor and TfL should continue to lobby the Department for Transport for devolution of suburban services from Southeastern, South Western Railway, Great Northern and Southern franchises, to lobby for the results of the Williams Rail Review to be published, and provide an update to the London Assembly Transport Committee by 5 March 2020 on recent progress in this area. EMBARGOED UNTIL FRIDAY 14 FEBRUARY 2020, 6:00AM E-Scooters & Micro-Mobility E-Scooters KEY FINDING Careful consideration will need to be given
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Total Number of Ballot Papers Counted 144501 Name Of
    Final Results GLA 2021 ELECTIONS CONSTITUENCY MEMBER OF THE LONDON ASSEMBLY RESULTS Constituency West Central Total number of ballot papers counted 144501 Name of Candidates Name of Registered Political Party Number of Votes Recorded (if any) Rita BEGUM Labour and Co-operative Party 52938 Tony DEVENISH Conservative Party Candidate 55163 Heiko Bernard KHOO Let London Live 1977 Zack POLANSKI Green Party 16427 Saradhi RAJAN ReformUK - London Deserves 1954 Better Ted TOWNSEND Liberal Democrats 13462 Total number of good votes 141921 The number of ballot papers rejected was as follows:- (a) Unmarked 2214 (b) Uncertain 154 (c) Voting for too many 207 (d) Writing identifying voter 5 (e) Want of official mark 0 Total number of Rejected ballots 2580 System Logged Electorate 365443 Turnout 39% Page 1 of 1 Generated On: 07/05/2021 19:09:33 Final Results GLA 2021 ELECTIONS LONDON-WIDE ASSEMBLY MEMBER - LONDON MEMBER (AT CONSTITUENCY LEVEL) Constituency West Central Total number of ballot papers counted 144545 Name of Registered Political Party or Independent Votes Animal Welfare Party - People, Animals, Environment (Animal Welfare 2438 Party - People, Animals, Environment) Christian Peoples Alliance 1157 Communist Party of Britain 460 Conservatives 51435 Green Party 16320 Heritage Party - Free Speech and Liberty (Heritage Party - Free Speech 903 and Liberty) Labour Party (Labour Party) 46364 Let London Live (Let London Live) 1121 Liberal Democrats 10742 Londependence (Londependence ) 268 London Real Party 1028 National Liberal Party - Self-determination
    [Show full text]
  • A Co-Operative Vision for South London's
    Party Support Mailing April 2012 NATIONAL NEWS Please find below the latest news from Parliament, our national campaigns, the Co-operative Councils Network and more. Please circulate to your members or include this in your local newsletters. You can find all the latest news and opinions from the Co-operative Party at www.party.coop. A Co-operative vision for South London’s libraries Labour & Co-operative councillor Timothy Godfrey, Secretary of the London Co-operative Party, contrasts the possibilities for library services offered by co-operative solutions and the cuts and closures threatened by Croydon’s Conservatives In Croydon, local Labour & Co-operative Councillors have proposed to the ruling Conservative Council that instead of privatising the library service to a large scale private provider or another local authority under contract, the Council exploits an example of efficiency and popularity on its doorstep. The Upper Norwood Joint Library, is an independent library authority funded and run by two South London Councils, Croydon Council and Lambeth Council. Croydon Council spends £8million running one central library and 12 branch libraries. If you allow a generous £1.2million to run the central library, and its £200,000 contribution to the Upper Norwood Library (Lambeth and Croydon both contribute half the budget), that leaves a cost per branch library in Croydon at a staggering £550,000 per year. That might be acceptable, if the branch libraries in Croydon were well staffed, open long hours and in large buildings. They are not. They are small, often only open 4 days a week. To add insult to injury, the Conservative run council cut half of all qualified librarians last year in a ‘cost cutting’ drive.
    [Show full text]
  • Back by Public Demand!
    SEBRA NEWS W2 PROBABLY THE Back by MOST TALKED ABOUT Public Demand!GARDEN PARTY IN WESTMINSTER JOHN ZAMIT PRESENTS ISSUE No 93 A SEBRA PRODUCTION SUMMER 2018 “ “ ““ CARRYCARRY ONON NHSNHS ‘U’ THANK YOU NHS SEBRA SUMMER GARDEN PARTY 5 JULY 2018 ON THIS DAY 70 YEARS AGO THE NHS WAS BORN INTRODUCTION In this Issue From the THE GREATEST INTRODUCTION 10 BRIDGE GRAFITTI 40 LITTLE BARBER SHOP FROM THE CHAIRMAN 3 Chairman FROM THE EDITOR 4 Chairman: John Zamit SAFETY VALVE Email: [email protected] DELIVERY SCOOTER WOES 6 Phone: 020 7727 6104 BANK CLOSURE AT SHORT NOTICE 8 Mobile: 074 3825 8201 AN UNWANTED DEVELOPMENT? 9 Address: 2 Claremont Court LABOUR UPS ITS VOTE 11 Queensway, London W2 5HX AROUND BAYSWATER STATUE SPARKLING AGAIN 12 elcome to the Summer Also, we advised our local Councillors Also as you have may have read in the ON THE BUSES - HOLD ON TIGHT 13 2018 issue of SEBRA of our surprise at the publication of the press and on seen on TV, Business Rates "NOT FIT FOR PURPOSE" 17 NEWS W2. It's another report during a "purdah" period during can be crippling. (These rates are not set LUNCH IN THE SUN AT POMONA'S 21 bumper edition running to the local elections. As a result the report by Westminster Council and nor do they POLICING THE CAPITAL 24 Wover 120 pages. We delayed publishing was pulled by Stuart Love, Westminstrer receive the full amount levied). NEWCOMBE HOUSE BATTLE LINES 29 due to some late stories we wanted to City Council's Chief Executive.
    [Show full text]
  • Safer Stronger Communties Supplementary Agenda PDF 921 KB
    Public Document Pack Safer Stronger Communities Select Committee Supplementary Agenda Monday, 4 February 2019 6.30 pm, Committee Room 1 Civic Suite Lewisham Town Hall London SE6 4RU For more information contact: Katie Wood - 0208 3149446 This meeting is an open meeting and all items on the agenda may be audio recorded and/or filmed. Part 1 Item Pages 4. The Impact of the Prevent strategy and "Stop and 3 - 42 Search" policy on community relations. - Evidence Session Members of the public are welcome to attend committee meetings. However, occasionally, committees may have to consider some business in private. Copies of agendas, minutes and reports are available on request in Braille, in large print, on audio tape, on computer disk or in other languages. This page is intentionally left blank Agenda Item 4 Councillors Morrison and Anwar along with the Scrutiny Manager attended the Lewisham Youth Independent Advisory Group at Lewisham Police Station on Thursday 24th January 2019. The group started a year ago and was designed to be a safe space for young people and a chance to chat to local Police and share concerns and ideas. The Police were working with schools. This was happening more now compared to the past but there was always room for improvement. There were 11 young women at the meeting and all felt that they didn’t mind the idea of stop and search and it could make people feel safer but it was important it was done “fairly and politely”. The young people reported that it could be a humiliating interaction and there should be more emphasis on respect and politeness.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Reports Pack PDF 2 MB
    AGENDA Meeting GLAOversightCommittee Date Thursday7November2013 Time 2.00pm Place CommitteeRoom5,CityHall,The Queen'sWalk,London,SE12AA Copiesofthereportsandanyattachmentsmaybefoundat http://www.london.gov.uk/mayor-assembly/london-assembly/oversight MostmeetingsoftheLondonAssemblyanditsCommitteesarewebcastliveat http://www.london.gov.uk/mayor-assembly/london-assembly/webcasts whereyoucanalsoview pastmeetings. MembersoftheCommittee LenDuvallAM(Chair) TonyArbourAM(DeputyChairman) JennetteArnoldOBEAM AndrewBoffAM DarrenJohnsonAM JoanneMcCartneyAM SteveO'ConnellAM CarolinePidgeonMBEAM ValerieShawcrossCBEAM AmeetingoftheCommitteehasbeencalledbytheChairoftheCommitteetodealwiththebusiness listedbelow.Thismeetingwillbeopentothepublic.Thereisaccessfordisabledpeople,and inductionloopsareavailable. MarkRoberts,ExecutiveDirectorofSecretariat Wednesday30October2013 FurtherInformation Ifyouhavequestions,wouldlikefurtherinformationaboutthemeetingorrequirespecialfacilities pleasecontact:JohnBarry,SeniorCommitteeOfficer;Telephone:02079834425;Email: [email protected];Minicom:02079834458. FormediaenquiriespleasecontactMarkDemery,02079835769. Ifyouhaveanyquestionsaboutindividualreportspleasecontactthereportauthorwhosedetailsare attheendofeachreport.Thereislimitedundergroundparkingfororangeandbluebadgeholders, whichwillbeallocatedonafirst-comefirst-servedbasis.PleasecontactFacilitiesManagement(020 79834750)inadvanceifyourequireaparkingspaceorfurtherinformation. Ifyou,orsomeoneyouknow,needsacopyoftheagenda,minutesorreports inlargeprintorBraille,audio,orinanotherlanguage,thenpleasecalluson
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of COVID-19 School Closures on Education Inequality in London
    Appendix 1 London Assembly Education Panel – 30 September 2020 Transcript of Agenda Item 9 – The Impact of COVID-19 School Closures on Education Inequality in London Jennette Arnold OBE AM (Chair): That brings us to today’s main item for discussion on the impact of COVID-19 school closures on education inequality in London. Can I welcome our guests? We have Joanne McCartney, Deputy Mayor for Education and Childcare - welcome, Joanne - and Stuart Darke, Regional Organiser, Greater London Regional Centre, for the NASUWT. Welcome, Stuart. I did check earlier, and I think everybody is happy with first name terms. We have with us Rebecca Montacute, Research and Policy Manager, Sutton Trust; Rob Coe, Senior Associate, Education Endowment Foundation (EEF); and Sarah Wilkins, Senior Manager, Education and Youth Team, Greater London Authority (GLA). It is nice when we know the public are following us and are interested in our work. A constituent has set out the impact that school closures are having on her, and the testing regime, and I just thought I would read in what she had to say to me: “Dear Jennette, I have three children. My middle child returned to school on Thursday, 10 September. On Monday, 28 September, we received a letter from the school telling us that she needed to self-isolate for two weeks as a close contact had tested positive for coronavirus. By the time she returns to school, she will have spent barely 50% of this academic year at school. This could also be a recurring problem. There is no limit on the amount of time students may have to self-isolate this year.
    [Show full text]
  • Questions to the Mayor of London and the Deputy Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis London Assembly (Plenary), 9 December
    Questions to the Mayor of London and the Deputy Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis London Assembly (Plenary), 9 December 2014 PRIORITY ORDER PAPER Report No: 4 Subject: Question and Answer Session on Policing in London Report of: Executive Director of Secretariat Meeting London’s Current and Future Policing Needs Question No: 2014/4962 Joanne McCartney With ever reducing budgets can the Metropolitan Police Service meet current and future policing needs? Violent Crime in London Question No: 2014/4963 Tony Arbour Whilst recorded crime continues to decrease, ‘Violence with Injury’ has seen a considerable increase this year. What measures are the Metropolitan Police taking to reduce violent crime? Undercover Police Still Employed by the Metropolitan Police Service Question No: 2014/4964 Jenny Jones How can Londoners have confidence in the Metropolitan Police Service if police officers who had sexual relationships while working undercover are still employed and may not face any sanction for their behaviour? Transparency in the Metropolitan Police Service Question No: 2014/4965 Caroline Pidgeon Should the Met Police promote trust through transparency by having a compulsory public register of interests including membership of organisations such as the freemasons? Questions not asked during Mayor’s Question Time will be given a written response by Friday 12 December 2014. Questions for Written Response Cost of Water Cannon Training Question No: 2014/4966 Caroline Pidgeon What is the forecast spend in 2014/15 on training officers to use the Water Cannon? Update on Cardiff Model progress Question No: 2014/4967 Caroline Pidgeon Please publish a summary of the responses you have received from the Hospital Trusts you wrote to regarding the implementation of the Cardiff Model in London.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vote for Confidence?
    DR Elections Review Working Group Vote of Confidence? Lessons Learned from the 2010 General and Local Elections February 2011 Elections Review Working Group Vote of Confidence? Lessons Learned from the 2010 General and Local Elections February 2011 Copyright Greater London Authority February 2011 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen‟s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 ISBN This publication is printed on recycled paper Elections Review Working Group Members Andrew Boff (Chairman) Conservative Jennette Arnold Labour Len Duvall Labour Darren Johnson Green Steve O‟Connell Conservative Caroline Pidgeon Liberal Democrat Contents Foreword 7 Executive Summary 8 1 Introduction 10 2 Issues to be reviewed 12 3 Queues and people being unable to vote 15 4 Administrative challenges: Voter registration and postal votes 26 5 The Count 33 6 Learning lessons from the May 2010 elections in London 35 Appendix 2 Individual Registration 39 Appendix 3 Orders and translations 40 6 Foreword We pride ourselves that democracy is in this country's DNA. There is a danger that that pride can lead to complacency. The elections in May 2010 were a reminder that we should constantly review the mechanisms that are in place to enable the citizen's right to vote. The 2010 elections will be remembered for the crowds outside the polling stations. In Hackney and Islington, those crowds were waiting patiently to vote but hundreds were unable to exercise that fundamental right when the polls closed. In other parts of London, those crowds were last minute canvassers, trying to cajole voters into supporting, or not supporting, particular candidates .
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation Report Summarises the Consultation Exercise and Responses Received
    A406 North Circular Road: Golders Green RoadA24 with Epsom Brent Road Street – Cycle and Bridge safety Lane to Goldersimprovements Green Road Proposed improvements to cycle facilities along A24 Proposed pedestrian and cyclist improvement works Epsom Road between Central Road and Lower ConsultationMorden LaneReport September 2016 March 2016 C ontents 1 Executive summary .......................................................................................... 1 2 Background....................................................................................................... 2 3 The consultation ............................................................................................... 3 4 Overview of consultation responses ................................................................. 5 5 Responses from statutory bodies and other stakeholders ................................ 9 6 Conclusion ...................................................................................................... 10 Appendix A - Copy of consultation letter………………………………………………………… 11 Appendix B – Letter distribution area ........................................................................ 15 Appendix C – List of stakeholders consulted ............................................................ 15 Appendix D - A list of views and suggestions made during the consultation………..17 Appendix E – Response to issues raised ................................................................ 19 1 Executive summary We recently consulted on proposed improvements for
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 4 Written Answers to Questions Not Answered at Mayor's Question Time on 22 June 2017
    Appendix 4 Written Answers to Questions Not Answered at Mayor's Question Time on 22 June 2017 Mayor's progress Question No: 2017/2568 Fiona Twycross After one year in office, what progress has been made in delivering the Mayor's manifesto? Oral response Police numbers Question No: 2017/2244 Gareth Bacon Can you tell us how you calculated that 12,800 police officers will be cut from the Metropolitan Police Service? Oral response Estate regeneration Question No: 2017/2174 Sian Berry How will your updated guidance ensure that estate regeneration only takes place when resident support has been established? Oral response One Year Review Question No: 2017/2280 David Kurten Now that you have been Mayor for a year, will you give me some answers to the questions to which you and your officers have not given an adequate response over the past year, such as, when you will stop granting licences to diesel PHVs, how many jobs will be lost in the 2,000 businesses at Park Royal which will have to close or relocate and when you are going to plant the two million trees you promised in your manifesto? Oral response Metropolitan Police Question No: 2017/2553 Joanne McCartney What more needs to be done to ensure the Metropolitan Police can respond to the continuing threat of terrorism? Oral response Question Title Safer Neighbourhood Teams Question No: 2017/2352 Caroline Pidgeon What is your strategic target for PCSOs in ward Safer Neighbourhood Teams across London? Oral response Garden Bridge Review (1) Question No: 2017/2230 Andrew Boff Will you supply
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX [ 19 – Never Again: Sprinklers As the Next Step Towards Safer Homes. London Planning Committee]
    IN THE FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL Case ref: LON/00BJ/LSC/0286 PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) In the Matter of: The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985; Section 27A B E T W E E N: THE MAYOR AND BURGESSES OF THE LONDON BOROUGH OF WANDSWORTH Applicant/ Landlord and VARIOUS LEASEHOLDERS OF 100 HIGH-RISE RESIDENTIAL BLOCKS IN THE LONDON BOROUGH OF WANDSWORTH Respondents/ Leaseholders ________________________________________ APPENDIX [ 19 – Never Again: Sprinklers as the next step towards safer homes. London Planning Committee] TO THE STATEMENT OF CASE ON BEHALF OF THE LONDON BROUGH OF WANDSWORTH ________________________________________ Never again: Sprinklers as the next step towards safer homes Planning Committee March 2018 Holding the Mayor to account and investigating issues that matter to Londoners Planning Committee Members Nicky Gavron AM Tony Devenish AM (Chair) Conservative Labour Andrew Boff AM Navin Shah AM (Deputy Chairman) Labour Conservative Tom Copley AM Labour The Planning Committee’s role is to scrutinise the detail of the London Plan, the Mayor’s use of his planning powers and the strategic planning challenges facing London. Contact Reece Harris, Assistant Scrutiny Alison Bell, Communications Manager Manager Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Telephone: 020 7983 5802 Telephone: 020 7983 4228 Follow us: @LondonAssembly #AssemblyPlanning facebook.com/london.assembly Contents Foreword .................................................................................... 4 Summary ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth Parliamentary Association
    COMMONWEALTH PARLIAMENTARY ASSOCIATION REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE UNITED KINGDOM BRANCH 2008/09 COMMONWEALTH PARLIAMENTARY ASSOCIATION REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE UNITED KINGDOM BRANCH 2008/09 COMMONWEALTH PARLIAMENTARY ASSOCIATION UNITED KINGDOM BRANCH Presidents RT HON. BARONESS HAYMAN (Lord Speaker) RT HON. MICHAEL MARTIN MP (Speaker of the House of Commons) Vice-Presidents RT HON. BARONESS BOOTHROYD OF SANDWELL RT HON. GORDON BROWN MP (Prime Minister) RT HON. LORD CARRINGTON KG GCMG CH MC DL RT HON. LORD FALCONER OF THOROTON QC RT HON. LORD HOWE OF ABERAVON CH QC RT HON. LORD HURD OF WESTWELL CH CBE RT HON. DAVID CAMERON MP RT HON. LORD IRVINE OF LAIRG QC RT HON. LORD MACKAY OF CLASHFERN KT RT HON. LORD OWEN CH RT HON. JACK STRAW MP RT HON. BARONESS THATCHER LG OM FRS Chairman of the UK Branch RT HON. GORDON BROWN MP (Prime Minister) Executive Committee Chair Mr JOHN AUSTIN MP Joint Vice-Chairs RT HON. LORD ANDERSON OF SWANSEA DL (until 21 July 2008) MR DAVID CLELLAND MP (until 21 July 2008) SIR NICHOLAS WINTERTON DL MP (until 21 July 2008) RT HON. JOHN MCFALL MP (from 21 July 2008) MS ANN MCINTOSH MP (from 21 July 2008) BARONESS NORTHOVER (from 21 July 2008) Honorary Treasurer RT HON. SIR JOHN STANLEY MP Members MR JOHN AUSTIN MP (Chair) RT HON. SIR JOHN STANLEY MP (Hon. Treasurer) RT HON. LORD ANDERSON OF SWANSEA DL RT HON. KEVIN BARRON MP MR HUGH BAYLEY MP DR ROBERTA BLACKMAN-WOODS MP RT HON. GORDON BROWN MP (ex-officio) MR PETER BOTTOMLEY MP RT HON.
    [Show full text]