DOCSLIB.ORG

As- Consultation on Possible Changes to Bus Route

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
As- Consultation on Possible Changes to Bus Route aS- Consultation on possible changes to bus route W11 Consultation Report September 2016 Consultation on possible changes to bus route W11 Consultation Report Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1 2 The consultation .......................................................................................................................... 1 3 Responses from members of the public ...................................................................................... 3 4 Responses from statutory bodies and other stakeholders ........................................................... 8 Appendices Appendix A - Copy of the CRM email ................................................................................................. 9 Appendix B – Copy of Consultation Letter ........................................................................................ 10 Appendix C – Stop notice ................................................................................................................. 12 Appendix E – List of stakeholders consulted .................................................................................... 14 1 Introduction We recently consulted stakeholders and the public about proposed changes to bus route W11. The consultation took place between 14 June and 15 August 2016. Between May 2012 and December 2014 Palmerston Road railway bridge in Walthamstow was closed for maintenance work. As a result, route W11 was put on temporary diversion via Forest Road, Hoe Street and Selborne Road to Walthamstow Central. Route W15 was also temporarily re-routed via Forest Road, Blackhorse Road and South Grove. Once the works were completed both routes returned to their normal line of route along Palmerston Road. However, it was noted that the Selbourne Road diversion increased usage on the W15 while the diversion was in place. Further, substantial housing development is scheduled for the Blackhorse Road area. It is expected that up to 2,500 units will be built in total, along with other area amenities – including additional local retail and a primary school. Description of the proposals Route W11 runs between Chingford Hall Estate and Walthamstow Central Station with buses every 10 mins Monday to Saturday daytimes, and 15 minutes on Sundays. During the evenings it runs 15 minutes Mondays to Saturdays and half hour on Sundays. We proposed to re-route the W11 via Forest Road, Blackhorse Road and South Grove. This would provide new links to the Victoria Line and Overground services at Blackhorse Road station. It would also help provide additional capacity for new developments on Blackhorse Road and Selborne Road. We are also proposing increasing the Sunday evening frequencies of the W11 from every 30 minutes to every 15 minutes. Under these proposals the W11 would no longer service Palmerston Road; however, the W15 would continue to cover this road. The terminus of the W11 would not change. This report explains the background to the proposal, the consultation and summarises the responses. It will contribute to the decision on whether to go ahead with this proposed change or not. 2 The consultation The consultation was designed to enable us to understand local opinion about the proposed changes to these routes. The potential outcomes of the consultation are: We decide the consultation raises no issues that should prevent us from proceeding with the scheme as originally planned We modify the scheme in response to issues raised in consultation 1 We abandon the scheme as a result of issues raised in the consultation. 2.1 Consultation objectives The objectives of the consultation were: To give stakeholders and the public easily-understandable information about the proposals and allow them to respond To understand the level of support or opposition for the change To understand any issues that might affect the proposal of which we were not previously aware To understand concerns and objections To allow respondents to make suggestions. 2.2 Who we consulted The consultation intended to seek the views of people who use the bus routes involved and those who might potentially use the service. We also consulted stakeholders including the affected Councils, traffic police, London TravelWatch, Members of Parliament, Assembly Members and local interest groups. A list of the stakeholders we consulted is shown in Appendix E and a summary of their responses is given in Section 4. 2.3 Consultation material, distribution and publicity The consultation was published online. The dedicated webpage explained the background to the proposal. We invited people to respond by answering a number of questions and leaving comments. We raised awareness of the consultation by sending an email to approximately 2,000 registered Oyster Card holders who have used route W11, key stakeholders across London, and via consultation letter detailing the plan to residents within a 400-metre radius of the main developments outlined in the proposals. Copies of consultation materials are shown in Appendix A. People were invited to respond to the consultation using a variety of methods. They could respond via our freepost address (FREEPOST TFL CONSULTATIONS), by emailing [email protected] or by accessing the online consultation where they could let us know their views. There were four closed questions (questions 1-4), and one open question (question 5) about the proposal. The following questions specifically asked respondents about the scheme: - Question 1: Do you currently use the route W11? - Question 2: How often do you use route W11? - Question 3: Do you support the proposals for route W11? - Question 4: Would you use the proposed changes to route W11 should they be implemented? - Question 5: Do you have any further comments about proposed changes to route W11? 2 3 Responses from members of the public We received 335 written responses from members of the public and stakeholders. Response type 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Online Email Post Number of responses 312 17 6 % of responses 93% 5% 2% In the consultation we asked eleven questions in total (six general and five specific). Of the general questions we asked respondents for their name, email address, post code, and if they were responding on behalf of an organisation. We also asked respondents how they had heard about the consultation. How did you hear about this consultation? 250 200 150 100 50 0 Received Received Read Saw it on Other Not Social an email a letter about in the TfL (please Answere media from TfL from TfL the press website specify) d Number of responses 93 75 3 19 74 30 41 % of responses 28% 22% 1% 6% 22% 9% 12% 3 Do you currently use route W11? 250 200 150 100 50 0 Yes No Not Answered Number of respondents 246 66 23 % of respondents 73% 20% 7% How often do you use route W11? 250 200 150 100 50 0 2-3 times Once a 1-2 times Not Daily Rarely Never a week week a month Answered Number of respondents 73 84 23 36 53 37 29 % of respondents 22% 25% 7% 11% 16% 11% 9% 4 Do you support our proposals for route W11? 250 200 150 100 50 0 No Not Yes Partially Not sure No opinion Answered Number of respondents 198 29 7 1 98 2 % of respondents 59% 9% 2% 0% 29% 1% Would you use the changes to route W11? 250 200 150 100 50 0 Yes No Not sure Not Answered Number of respondents 202 79 30 24 % of respondents 60% 24% 9% 7% 5 Question 5: Do you have any further comments about proposed changes to route W11? We asked people to elaborate on their previous answer by asking “Do you have any comments?” Individual responses for question 5 have been coded to one or many codes as appropriate. The code frames include several overall themes and, within these, specific comments. There were 10 key themes raised from question 5, of which 3 (in bold) could be further expanded upon. The table below indicates these issues. A total of 45 per cent (147) respondents expanded on their comments in this section. Respondents tended to marginally suggest alternative routes above any other comment (54), which is in reference to the possibility of increased duration of route times if the W11 heads via Blackhorse Road. Number of Main issues with W11 proposals comments alternative route possible 54 journey times will be extended 53 proposals will remove an essential route 52 general frequency increase needed 38 congestion 28 overcrowding 27 other comments 23 new route necessary to fill capacity issues 19 proposals are redundant 15 additional route extensions are also necessary 10 frequency increase is unnecessary 4 There were 54 comments in which the respondents suggested alternative routes. These comments were extremely varied, though did result in some coherence of theme. The route cited as the most probable alternative to the W11 was the W15 (20). These are listed in decreasing order in the table overleaf. 6 Number of Alternative routes/route changes to proposals comments W15 20 Alter route 158 instead 7 Alter route 230 instead 5 Redevelop/reroute buses via billet roundabout 4 Reroute via Mission Grove 3 Alternate stops on Blackhorse Road with W12 2 Return W11 to temporary routing via Hoe Street 2 Alter route 192 instead 1 Alter route 212 instead 1 Alter route 215 instead 1 Alter route 257 instead 1 Alter route 357 instead 1 Alter route 393 instead 1 Alter route 41 instead 1 Alter route 76 instead 1 Alter route W19 instead 1 Divert via South County Road 1 Split W11 into two routes to cover original catchment 1 20 respondents
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Co-Operative Vision for South London's
    Party Support Mailing April 2012 NATIONAL NEWS Please find below the latest news from Parliament, our national campaigns, the Co-operative Councils Network and more. Please circulate to your members or include this in your local newsletters. You can find all the latest news and opinions from the Co-operative Party at www.party.coop. A Co-operative vision for South London’s libraries Labour & Co-operative councillor Timothy Godfrey, Secretary of the London Co-operative Party, contrasts the possibilities for library services offered by co-operative solutions and the cuts and closures threatened by Croydon’s Conservatives In Croydon, local Labour & Co-operative Councillors have proposed to the ruling Conservative Council that instead of privatising the library service to a large scale private provider or another local authority under contract, the Council exploits an example of efficiency and popularity on its doorstep. The Upper Norwood Joint Library, is an independent library authority funded and run by two South London Councils, Croydon Council and Lambeth Council. Croydon Council spends £8million running one central library and 12 branch libraries. If you allow a generous £1.2million to run the central library, and its £200,000 contribution to the Upper Norwood Library (Lambeth and Croydon both contribute half the budget), that leaves a cost per branch library in Croydon at a staggering £550,000 per year. That might be acceptable, if the branch libraries in Croydon were well staffed, open long hours and in large buildings. They are not. They are small, often only open 4 days a week. To add insult to injury, the Conservative run council cut half of all qualified librarians last year in a ‘cost cutting’ drive.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Cycling and Pedestrian Improvements on A21 Farnborough Way at Green Street Green
    Proposed cycling and pedestrian improvements on A21 Farnborough Way at Green Street Green Consultation Report October 2013 1 Contents 1. Introduction……………………………………………….….……………………..2 2. The Consultation.................………………………………………………………4 3. Results of the consultation…......………………………………………….......... 4 4. Conclusion………………………………………………………………………….10 Appendix A – copy of consultation letter…………………………..……...….…11 Appendix B – list of stakeholders consulted.……………………………..…….13 2 1 Introduction Background In 2005 a petition with 100 signatures was received by Transport for London (TfL) from Bob Neill (London Assembly Member), asking us to provide a signal controlled crossing on the A21 near the junction with Cudham Lane North. An investigation into providing improved crossing facilities was initiated the same year resulting in a design consisting of a staggered signal controlled crossing which was consulted on in January 2010. Subsequently it was decided that the scheme was not deliverable as collision data for the road was not sufficient to justify the cost of the scheme or impact on general traffic movements. An alternative scheme for addressing pedestrian improvements was subsequently designed (as detailed below). Objectives The proposals are designed to improve pedestrian and cycling accessibility and connectivity around the A21 Green Street Green roundabout and in particular to provide improved pedestrian and cycle links between A21 Farnborough Way and A21 Sevenoaks Way as well as the residential developments in Cudham Lane North and the centre of Green Street Green, without significant impact on general traffic movements. General Scope of proposals The proposals would see the introduction of a new wide uncontrolled pedestrian and cycle crossing facility across A21 Farnborough Way, improvements to the existing crossing facility across Cudham Lane North, and improved shared pedestrian and cycle routes.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Reports Pack PDF 2 MB
    AGENDA Meeting GLAOversightCommittee Date Thursday7November2013 Time 2.00pm Place CommitteeRoom5,CityHall,The Queen'sWalk,London,SE12AA Copiesofthereportsandanyattachmentsmaybefoundat http://www.london.gov.uk/mayor-assembly/london-assembly/oversight MostmeetingsoftheLondonAssemblyanditsCommitteesarewebcastliveat http://www.london.gov.uk/mayor-assembly/london-assembly/webcasts whereyoucanalsoview pastmeetings. MembersoftheCommittee LenDuvallAM(Chair) TonyArbourAM(DeputyChairman) JennetteArnoldOBEAM AndrewBoffAM DarrenJohnsonAM JoanneMcCartneyAM SteveO'ConnellAM CarolinePidgeonMBEAM ValerieShawcrossCBEAM AmeetingoftheCommitteehasbeencalledbytheChairoftheCommitteetodealwiththebusiness listedbelow.Thismeetingwillbeopentothepublic.Thereisaccessfordisabledpeople,and inductionloopsareavailable. MarkRoberts,ExecutiveDirectorofSecretariat Wednesday30October2013 FurtherInformation Ifyouhavequestions,wouldlikefurtherinformationaboutthemeetingorrequirespecialfacilities pleasecontact:JohnBarry,SeniorCommitteeOfficer;Telephone:02079834425;Email: [email protected];Minicom:02079834458. FormediaenquiriespleasecontactMarkDemery,02079835769. Ifyouhaveanyquestionsaboutindividualreportspleasecontactthereportauthorwhosedetailsare attheendofeachreport.Thereislimitedundergroundparkingfororangeandbluebadgeholders, whichwillbeallocatedonafirst-comefirst-servedbasis.PleasecontactFacilitiesManagement(020 79834750)inadvanceifyourequireaparkingspaceorfurtherinformation. Ifyou,orsomeoneyouknow,needsacopyoftheagenda,minutesorreports inlargeprintorBraille,audio,orinanotherlanguage,thenpleasecalluson
    [Show full text]
  • View Call List: Chamber PDF File 0.08 MB
    Issued on: 19 April at 5.37pm Call lists for the Chamber Tuesday 20 April 2021 A list of Members, both virtually and physically present, selected to ask Oral Questions and to speak in response to Urgent Questions and Ministerial Statements; and a list of Members both physically and virtually present selected to participate in substantive proceedings. Call lists are compiled and published incrementally as information becomes available. For the most up-to-date information see the parliament website: https://commonsbusiness.parliament.uk/ CONTENTS 1. Oral Questions to the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs 1 2. Urgent Question: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on Afghanistan 6 3. Ministerial Statement: Minister for Equalities on Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities 7 4. Finance Bill: Committee Stage (Construction industry scheme etc and tax avoidance or evasion) 8 5. Finance Bill: Committee Stage (Stamp duty land tax, enveloped dwellings) 9 6. Finance Bill: Committee Stage (VAT, steel removed to Northern Ireland, banking) 11 ORAL QUESTIONS TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR FOREIGN, COMMONWEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT AFFAIRS After prayers Order Member Question Party Virtual/ Minister replying Physical 1 Ben Everitt (Milton What steps the Government Con Physical Secretary Raab Keynes North) is taking to help ensure that children in fragile and conflict-affected countries can access education and learning. 2 Sarah Champion Supplementary Lab Virtual Secretary Raab (Rotherham) 2 Tuesday 20 April 2021 Order Member Question Party Virtual/ Minister replying Physical 3 Chris Law (Dundee Supplementary SNP Virtual Secretary Raab West) 4 + 5 Rachel Hopkins (Luton What recent assessment he Lab Virtual S+B5:F21ecretary South) has made of the (a) human- Raab itarian and (b) human rights situation in Tigray, Ethiopia.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Darwin News Updates
    News from Darwin Conservatives Spring 2020 YOUR DARWIN NEWS UPDATES From Councillor Scoates. "I like to keep in regular contact with local residents. I value discussing local issues with people who are involved or affected by them." "I'm very pleased to have been places of interest in the Village invited to Residents’ Meeting at and local areas. Downe, Cudham, Blackness • The Permit Parking scheme Lane and Beechwood estate. introduced on the Beechwood The updates I get from these Estate has concluded meetings raise issues that I try satisfactorily and residents are my best to resolve. The many happy with the current Residents’ Associations are a arrangements. great conduit for issues that are not raised with me personally. • The over-flow car park for Christmas Tree Farm has now • There’s good news for been made official. The car Downe Village. Along with park has proven to reduce funds raised by the Downe parking problems surrounding Residents’ Association, Bromley the Farm during busy times. Council have agreed to fund an Christmas Tree Farm have also ‘Information Board’ to be allowed it to be used for erected in the centre of the community events and is very Village. This will point out much run for the Village." Darwin Ward Councillor, Richard Scoates CRIME-FIGHTING HOUSING AND YOUTH WORKER PLANNING Crime across London is on the rise. In Since his election in 2010, Councillor fact, knife crime is the highest it’s been in Richard Scoates has worked tirelessly to 11 years. It has risen by 39%. That’s 4500 protect our environment and our precious more offences since Sadiq Khan became Green Belt land Mayor.
    [Show full text]
  • Questions to the Mayor of London and the Deputy Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis London Assembly (Plenary), 9 December
    Questions to the Mayor of London and the Deputy Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis London Assembly (Plenary), 9 December 2014 PRIORITY ORDER PAPER Report No: 4 Subject: Question and Answer Session on Policing in London Report of: Executive Director of Secretariat Meeting London’s Current and Future Policing Needs Question No: 2014/4962 Joanne McCartney With ever reducing budgets can the Metropolitan Police Service meet current and future policing needs? Violent Crime in London Question No: 2014/4963 Tony Arbour Whilst recorded crime continues to decrease, ‘Violence with Injury’ has seen a considerable increase this year. What measures are the Metropolitan Police taking to reduce violent crime? Undercover Police Still Employed by the Metropolitan Police Service Question No: 2014/4964 Jenny Jones How can Londoners have confidence in the Metropolitan Police Service if police officers who had sexual relationships while working undercover are still employed and may not face any sanction for their behaviour? Transparency in the Metropolitan Police Service Question No: 2014/4965 Caroline Pidgeon Should the Met Police promote trust through transparency by having a compulsory public register of interests including membership of organisations such as the freemasons? Questions not asked during Mayor’s Question Time will be given a written response by Friday 12 December 2014. Questions for Written Response Cost of Water Cannon Training Question No: 2014/4966 Caroline Pidgeon What is the forecast spend in 2014/15 on training officers to use the Water Cannon? Update on Cardiff Model progress Question No: 2014/4967 Caroline Pidgeon Please publish a summary of the responses you have received from the Hospital Trusts you wrote to regarding the implementation of the Cardiff Model in London.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Title Appointments and Urgency Committee – Appointment of Chair
    Report title Appointments and Urgency Committee – Appointment of Chair Meeting Date Authority 26 March 2015 Report by Document Number Clerk to the Authority FEP 2431 Public Summary The Mayor has appointed Gareth Bacon AM as Chairman of the London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority, with effect from 27 March 2015.This report seeks approval for the proposed Chairman to be appointed Chairman of the Authority’s Appointments and Urgency Committee, with effect from 27 March 2015. Recommendation 1. That Gareth Bacon AM be appointed Chairman of the Appointments and Urgency Committee with effect from 27 March 2015. Background 2. At its meeting on 29 January 2015, the Chairman announced that he had written to the Mayor and the Clerk of the Authority to inform them of his intention to stand down as Chairman of the Authority immediately after the full Authority meeting on 26 March 2015. 3. On 3 February 2015, the Mayor wrote to the Chairman of the London Assembly to inform the Assembly of his decision to nominate Gareth Bacon AM as Chairman of LFEPA from 27 March 2015 to 16 June 2015. On 23 February, the London Assembly held a Confirmation Hearings Committee meeting to consider this appointment and to put questions to the nominated Chairman. At the rise of the meeting, the Chair of the Confirmation Hearings Committee wrote to the Mayor to confirm that Gareth Bacon AM should be appointed to the role. The Mayor confirmed on 2 March 2015 that he had appointed Gareth Bacon to the office of Chairman of the Authority, with effect from 27 March 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vote for Confidence?
    DR Elections Review Working Group Vote of Confidence? Lessons Learned from the 2010 General and Local Elections February 2011 Elections Review Working Group Vote of Confidence? Lessons Learned from the 2010 General and Local Elections February 2011 Copyright Greater London Authority February 2011 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen‟s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 ISBN This publication is printed on recycled paper Elections Review Working Group Members Andrew Boff (Chairman) Conservative Jennette Arnold Labour Len Duvall Labour Darren Johnson Green Steve O‟Connell Conservative Caroline Pidgeon Liberal Democrat Contents Foreword 7 Executive Summary 8 1 Introduction 10 2 Issues to be reviewed 12 3 Queues and people being unable to vote 15 4 Administrative challenges: Voter registration and postal votes 26 5 The Count 33 6 Learning lessons from the May 2010 elections in London 35 Appendix 2 Individual Registration 39 Appendix 3 Orders and translations 40 6 Foreword We pride ourselves that democracy is in this country's DNA. There is a danger that that pride can lead to complacency. The elections in May 2010 were a reminder that we should constantly review the mechanisms that are in place to enable the citizen's right to vote. The 2010 elections will be remembered for the crowds outside the polling stations. In Hackney and Islington, those crowds were waiting patiently to vote but hundreds were unable to exercise that fundamental right when the polls closed. In other parts of London, those crowds were last minute canvassers, trying to cajole voters into supporting, or not supporting, particular candidates .
    [Show full text]
  • Bromley CAMRA June 2019 Newsletter Dear CAMRA Member
    This email was sent from your CAMRA Branch Bromley CAMRA June 2019 Newsletter Dear CAMRA member, Items of interest this month include: Branch Social Events Beckenham Beer and Cider Festival 2019 Branch Committee Vacancies Beer Scoring Using the Good Beer Guide App Summer of Pub Bromley Cramble 2019 An introduction to Maggie Hopgood “Its not all Lager” Branch Social Events 11 Jun. Bromley North Social. 7.30pm Crown & Anchor, 19 Park Rd, BR1 3HJ; 8.30pm Freelands Tavern, 31 Freelands Rd, BR1 3HZ; 9.30pm Red Lion, 10 North Rd BR1 3LG. 18 Jun. Hayes Social. 7.30pm Royal British Legion, 14 Station Hill, Hayes, BR2 7DJ; 8.30pm Real Ale Way, 55 Station Approach, BR2 7EB. 25 Jun. Committee Meeting. 7.30pm Queen’s Head, 25 High St. Downe, BR6 7US. All members are welcome to attend 29 Jun. The Annual Crystal Palace Triangle Social. with Croydon & Sutton & SEL Branches. Starts 12.00 noon at Douglas Fir, 144 Anerley Rd, Anerley SE20 8DL; 1.10pm; Alma, 95 Church Rd, Crystal Palace SE19 2TA; 2pm White Hart, 96 Church Rd, Upper Norwood SE19 2EZ; 2.50pm Postal Order, 33 Westow St. SE19 3RW; 3.50pm Sparrowhawk, 2 Westow Hill, Upper Norwood SE19 1RX; 4.40pm Walker Briggs, 23 Westow Hill SE19 1TQ; 5.30pm Faber Fox, 25-27 Westow Hill SE19 1TQ; 6.20pm Westow House, 79 Westow Hill SE19 1TX. 6 Jul. Branch Social at SIBA Beer Fest, The Slade, Tonbridge TN9 1HR. Meet Orpington Stn. at 10.50am for 11.12 Train to Tonbridge. Venue about 10min walk from Tonbridge Stn.
    [Show full text]
  • Members of the House of Commons December 2019 Diane ABBOTT MP
    Members of the House of Commons December 2019 A Labour Conservative Diane ABBOTT MP Adam AFRIYIE MP Hackney North and Stoke Windsor Newington Labour Conservative Debbie ABRAHAMS MP Imran AHMAD-KHAN Oldham East and MP Saddleworth Wakefield Conservative Conservative Nigel ADAMS MP Nickie AIKEN MP Selby and Ainsty Cities of London and Westminster Conservative Conservative Bim AFOLAMI MP Peter ALDOUS MP Hitchin and Harpenden Waveney A Labour Labour Rushanara ALI MP Mike AMESBURY MP Bethnal Green and Bow Weaver Vale Labour Conservative Tahir ALI MP Sir David AMESS MP Birmingham, Hall Green Southend West Conservative Labour Lucy ALLAN MP Fleur ANDERSON MP Telford Putney Labour Conservative Dr Rosena ALLIN-KHAN Lee ANDERSON MP MP Ashfield Tooting Members of the House of Commons December 2019 A Conservative Conservative Stuart ANDERSON MP Edward ARGAR MP Wolverhampton South Charnwood West Conservative Labour Stuart ANDREW MP Jonathan ASHWORTH Pudsey MP Leicester South Conservative Conservative Caroline ANSELL MP Sarah ATHERTON MP Eastbourne Wrexham Labour Conservative Tonia ANTONIAZZI MP Victoria ATKINS MP Gower Louth and Horncastle B Conservative Conservative Gareth BACON MP Siobhan BAILLIE MP Orpington Stroud Conservative Conservative Richard BACON MP Duncan BAKER MP South Norfolk North Norfolk Conservative Conservative Kemi BADENOCH MP Steve BAKER MP Saffron Walden Wycombe Conservative Conservative Shaun BAILEY MP Harriett BALDWIN MP West Bromwich West West Worcestershire Members of the House of Commons December 2019 B Conservative Conservative
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: List of Stakeholders That Responded to the ULEZ Consultation
    Appendix B (2) Appendix A: List of stakeholders that responded to the ULEZ consultation Air Quality Brentford Coulsdon & Purley Road User Alliance of British Drivers Forum Arriva Cross River Partnership Balfour Beatty Disabled Motoring UK Bambos Charalambous MP Federation of British Historic Barking and Dagenham and Vehicle Clubs Havering Green Party Federation of Small Businesses Barnet Green Party Forest Hill Society Better Streets for Enfield Freight Transport Association Bloomsbury Air Friends of the Earth Brentford Chamber of Gipsy Hill Green Party Commerce Greenpeace Brentford Community Council Greenwich Conservatives Brewery Logistics Group Heart of London Business British Heart Foundation Alliance British Lung Foundation Herne Hill Green Party British Motorcyclists Federation Hertfordshire County Council British Vehicle Rental and Hounslow and Brentford Leasing Association (BVRLA) Friends of the Earth Builders Merchants Federation Islington Green Party Campaign for Better Transport Joanne McCartney AM Campaign for Better Transport John Lewis Partnership (London Group) Kingston Environment Forum Campaign to Protect Rural Lambeth for a Cool Planet England Lambeth Green Party Caroline Pidgeon AM LEVC Caroline Russell AM Lewisham Cyclists Chartered Institute of Lewisham Liberal Democrats Environmental Health Licensed Taxi Drivers' Chiswick Liberal Democrats Association (LTDA) Church of England (Diocese of Living Streets Chelmsford) London Assembly Environment City of London Committee
    [Show full text]
  • Achieving Net Zero
    House of Commons Public Accounts Committee Achieving Net Zero Forty-Sixth Report of Session 2019–21 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 1 March 2021 EMBARGOED ADVANCE NOTICE: Not to be published in full, or in part, EMBARGOED ADVANCE NOTICE: Not to be published in full, or in part, in any form before 00.01am on Friday 5 March 2021 in any form before 00.01am on Friday 5 March 2021 HC 935 Published on 5 March 2021 by authority of the House of Commons The Committee of Public Accounts The Committee of Public Accounts is appointed by the House of Commons to examine “the accounts showing the appropriation of the sums granted by Parliament to meet the public expenditure, and of such other accounts laid before Parliament as the committee may think fit” (Standing Order No. 148). Current membership Meg Hillier MP (Labour (Co-op), Hackney South and Shoreditch) (Chair) Mr Gareth Bacon MP (Conservative, Orpington) Kemi Badenoch MP (Conservative, Saffron Walden) Shaun Bailey MP (Conservative, West Bromwich West) Olivia Blake MP (Labour, Sheffield, Hallam) Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown MP (Conservative, The Cotswolds) Barry Gardiner MP (Labour, Brent North) Dame Cheryl Gillan MP (Conservative, Chesham and Amersham) Peter Grant MP (Scottish National Party, Glenrothes) Mr Richard Holden MP (Conservative, North West Durham) Sir Bernard Jenkin MP (Conservative, Harwich and North Essex) Craig Mackinlay MP (Conservative, Thanet) Shabana Mahmood MP (Labour, Birmingham, Ladywood) Sarah Olney MP (Liberal Democrat, Richmond Park) Nick Smith MP (Labour, Blaenau Gwent) James Wild MP (Conservative, North West Norfolk) Powers Powers of the Committee of Public Accounts are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No.
    [Show full text]