DOCSLIB.ORG

Impacts of Anthropogenic Noise on Aquatic Invertebrates In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Impacts of Anthropogenic Noise on Aquatic Invertebrates In IMPACTS OF ANTHROPOGENIC NOISE ON AQUATIC INVERTEBRATES IN WETLAND HABITATS A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Adrienne M. Hopson August 2019 Copyright All rights reserved Except for previously published materials Dissertation written by Adrienne M. Hopson B.S., Long Island University: Southampton College, 1999 M.Ed., University of Houston, 2010 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2019 Approved by Ferenc de Szalay, Ph.D. , Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Mark Kershner, Ph.D. , Members, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Sean Veney, Ph.D. Emariana Widner, Ph.D. Daniel Holm, Ph.D. Accepted by Laura G. Leff, Ph.D. , Chair, Department of Biological Sciences James L. Blank, Ph.D. , Dean, College of Arts and Sciences ii TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ..............................................................................................................iii LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................v LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...........................................................................................................ix I. INTRODUCTION……………...............................................................................1 REFERENCES…………………………………………………………………..10 II. THE IMPACT OF SUBMERSED VEGETATION ON UNDERWATER SOUND TRANSMISSION IN FRESHWATER WETLANDS………………...16 ABSTRACT……............................................................................................…...16 INTRODUCTION……………………….............................................................18 METHODS………..........................................................................................…..20 RESULTS..............................................................................................................22 DISCUSSION........................................................................................................33 REFERENCES………..........................................................................................37 III. COMPARING HOW ABOVE-WATER AND BELOW-WATER SOUNDSCAPES DIFFER BETWEEN RURAL WETLANDS AND SITES AFFECTED BY ROAD NOISE…………………………………………………41 ABSTRACT…….......................................................................................………41 INTRODUCTION……………………….............................................................42 METHODS………................................................................................................44 RESULTS..............................................................................................................50 DISCUSSION........................................................................................................62 REFERENCES………..........................................................................................65 iii IV. THE IMPACT OF SHORT-TERM ANTHROPOGENIC NOISE ON SOUND PRODUCTION AND BEHAVIOR OF THE WHITE RIVER CRAYFISH, PROCAMBARUS ACUTUS (DECAPODA: CAMBARIDAE)………………….69 ABSTRACT……...................................................................................................69 INTRODUCTION……………………….............................................................70 METHODS………................................................................................................72 RESULTS..............................................................................................................77 DISCUSSION........................................................................................................83 REFERENCES………..........................................................................................86 V. DOES ANTHROPOGENIC NOISE AFFECT BEHAVIOR AND ACOUSTIC COMMUNICATION IN THE WHITE RIVER CRAYFISH, PROCAMBARUS ACUTUS (DECAPODA: CAMBARIDAE)?........................................................91 ABSTRACT……...................................................................................................91 INTRODUCTION……………………….............................................................92 METHODS………................................................................................................95 RESULTS............................................................................................................100 DISCUSSION......................................................................................................106 REFERENCES………........................................................................................108 VI. SUMMARY CHAPTER…..................................................................................113 REFERENCES………........................................................................................117 iv LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1. Spectrograms recorded at 1 m from sound source in wetland ponds arranged from lowest (Pond 1) to highest submersed plant density (Pond 5). ………………………………….25 Figure 2.2. Spectrograms recorded at 7 m from sound source in wetland ponds arranged from lowest (Pond 1) to highest submersed plant density (Pond 5)…………………………………...26 Figure 2.3. Spectrograms recorded at 15 m from sound source in wetland ponds arranged from lowest (Pond 1) to highest submersed plant density (Pond 5). …………………………….........27 Figure 2.4. Mean number of frequency bands (+/- 1 standard error) detected in two treatments (unvegetated, vegetated) at three distances (1 m, 7 m,15 m) from the sound source.…………...28 Figure 2.5. Mean (+/- 1 standard error) intensity (dB) of the Hi-mix sound in two treatments (unvegetated, vegetated) at three distances (1 m, 7 m, 15 m) from the sound source ..................31 Figure 2.6. Mean (+/- 1 standard error) intensity (decibel) of Low Base Tones recorded in two treatments (unvegetated and vegetated) at three distances (1,7,15m) from the sound source. ….32 Figure 2.7. Mean (+/- 1 standard error) intensity (dB) of motorboat noise recorded in two treatments (unvegetated and vegetated) at three distances (1,7,15m) from the sound source…...33 Figure 3.1. Locations of wetlands sampled during study ……………………………………….48 Figure 3.2. Number (mean +/- 1 SE) of above-water natural and anthropogenic sounds in Disturbed and Undisturbed wetlands in May, August and October……………………………..55 Figure 3.3. Number (mean +/- 1 SE) of above-water natural and anthropogenic sounds in Disturbed and Undisturbed wetlands in May, August and October in low, mid, and high frequency bands …………………………………………………………………………………56 Figure 3.4. Number (mean +/- 1 SE) of bird, frog and insect calls in Disturbed and Undisturbed wetlands at 8:00 in May. ………………………………………………………………………...57 v Figure 3.5 Above water soundscape diversity (mean +/- 1SE) in Disturbed and Undisturbed wetlands in May, August and October. Acoustic diversity is given as Shannon’s diversity (H’)……………………………………………………………………………………………….58 Figure 3.6. Number (mean +/- 1 SE) of below-water natural and anthropogenic sounds in Disturbed and Undisturbed wetlands in May, August and October……………………………..60 Figure 3.7. Number (mean +/- 1 SE) of below-water natural and anthropogenic sounds in Disturbed and Undisturbed wetlands in May, August and October in low, mid and high frequency ban…………………………………………………………………………..………...61 Figure 3.8. Below water soundscape diversity (mean +/- 1 SE) in Disturbed and Undisturbed wetlands in May, August and October. Acoustic diversity is given as Shannon’s diversity (H’)……………………………………………………………………………………………….62 Figure 4.1. Spectrograms of a representative Procambarus acutus pulse train……………….....78 Figure 4.2. Average count of crayfish behavior in each treatment group (NS = No Sound, S = Sound) during each Time period (Before, During, After)………………………………..……...80 Figure 4.3. Total activity levels (mean +/- 1 SE) of crayfish in each treatment group (No Sound, Sound) during each Time period (Before, During, After)………………………………….........82 Figure 4.4. Number of clicks produced (mean +/- 1 SE) of crayfish in each treatment group (No Sound, Sound) during each Time period (Before, During, After)…...…………………………..83 Figure 5.1. Total activity levels (mean +/- 1 SE) of crayfish in each treatment group (No Sound, Sound) during each Time point (Pre, 2 week, 4 week, Post). Note that values are expressed in log10 ………………………………………………………………………………………….....102 Figure 5.2. Levels of behaviors (mean +/- 1 SE) of crayfish in each treatment group (No Sound, Sound) during each Time point (Pre, 2 week, 4 week, Post). ………………………………….103 vi Figure 5.3. Number of clicks produced (mean +/- 1 SE) of crayfish in each treatment group (No Sound, Sound) during each Time period (Pre, 2 week, 4 week, Post). Note that values are expressed in log10. ……………………………………………………………………………...104 vii LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1. Environmental conditions of wetlands at HAERF in July 2012……………………...23 Table 3.1. Treatment site locations, distance to nearest paved road, and sound levels during Initial visit………………………………………………………………………………………..46 Table 3.2. Baseline characteristics of sites by treatment ………………………………………..52 Table 4.1 Modified crayfish behavior ethogram…………………………………………………76 Table 5.1. Modified crayfish behavior ethogram…………………………………………….......99 Table 5.2. Results of correlation analyses between the sound production and behavior…….....105 viii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I dedicate my dissertation to my parents, Cynthia and Harvey Hopson. Thank you for always making education the most
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ED45E Rare and Scarce Species Hierarchy.Pdf
    104 Species 55 Mollusc 8 Mollusc 334 Species 181 Mollusc 28 Mollusc 44 Species 23 Vascular Plant 14 Flowering Plant 45 Species 23 Vascular Plant 14 Flowering Plant 269 Species 149 Vascular Plant 84 Flowering Plant 13 Species 7 Mollusc 1 Mollusc 42 Species 21 Mollusc 2 Mollusc 43 Species 22 Mollusc 3 Mollusc 59 Species 30 Mollusc 4 Mollusc 59 Species 31 Mollusc 5 Mollusc 68 Species 36 Mollusc 6 Mollusc 81 Species 43 Mollusc 7 Mollusc 105 Species 56 Mollusc 9 Mollusc 117 Species 63 Mollusc 10 Mollusc 118 Species 64 Mollusc 11 Mollusc 119 Species 65 Mollusc 12 Mollusc 124 Species 68 Mollusc 13 Mollusc 125 Species 69 Mollusc 14 Mollusc 145 Species 81 Mollusc 15 Mollusc 150 Species 84 Mollusc 16 Mollusc 151 Species 85 Mollusc 17 Mollusc 152 Species 86 Mollusc 18 Mollusc 158 Species 90 Mollusc 19 Mollusc 184 Species 105 Mollusc 20 Mollusc 185 Species 106 Mollusc 21 Mollusc 186 Species 107 Mollusc 22 Mollusc 191 Species 110 Mollusc 23 Mollusc 245 Species 136 Mollusc 24 Mollusc 267 Species 148 Mollusc 25 Mollusc 270 Species 150 Mollusc 26 Mollusc 333 Species 180 Mollusc 27 Mollusc 347 Species 189 Mollusc 29 Mollusc 349 Species 191 Mollusc 30 Mollusc 365 Species 196 Mollusc 31 Mollusc 376 Species 203 Mollusc 32 Mollusc 377 Species 204 Mollusc 33 Mollusc 378 Species 205 Mollusc 34 Mollusc 379 Species 206 Mollusc 35 Mollusc 404 Species 221 Mollusc 36 Mollusc 414 Species 228 Mollusc 37 Mollusc 415 Species 229 Mollusc 38 Mollusc 416 Species 230 Mollusc 39 Mollusc 417 Species 231 Mollusc 40 Mollusc 418 Species 232 Mollusc 41 Mollusc 419 Species 233
    [Show full text]
  • Health, the Global Ocean and Marine Resources 1  Marine Pollution Can Poison Us
    HEALTH, THE GLOBAL OCEAN AND MARINE POLICY BRIEF RESOURCES The global ocean (interconnected system of Earth’s oceanic waters) plays Key messages a central and positive role in human life, including through the climate system. Damage to the ocean is far-reaching in its effects, in terms of Taking action on one SDG productivity, species diversity and resilience. Global ocean activities are gets results in others: health putting populations at risk (1). runs through every SDG. The “health” of the global ocean is both affected by and a threat to human activities. People have lived in harmony with the ocean for generations and ENSURE HEALTHY have relied on its bounty. Fish and seafood from a healthy ocean LIVES AND PROMOTE contribute to our health. The best-documented and direct benefits WELL-BEING FOR ALL AT ALL AGES. to human health and well-being from the ocean are linked to the consumption of fish and seafood, rich in omega-3 fatty acids, and non-terrestrial animal proteins. Indirect benefits to health also CONSERVE AND SUSTAINABLY USE arise from marine-derived pharmaceuticals and vitamins. THE OCEANS, SEAS AND MARINE RESOURCES FOR SUSTAINABLE Society benefits from the seas. The coastal waters provide DEVELOPMENT. employment, commerce, cultural, social interaction and artistic activities. They offer a variety of social, economic, health, cultural and environmental benefits to human livelihoods (2). The global ocean helps people to feel good. There is increasing recognition of the value of coastal waters in promoting better mental health through decreased vulnerability to depression. Better physical and mental health is also gained through exercise, such as swimming, walking and sailing.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Birds & Wildlife
    Alaska Birds & Wildlife Pribilof Islands - 25th to 27th May 2016 (4 days) Nome - 28th May to 2nd June 2016 (5 days) Barrow - 2nd to 4th June 2016 (3 days) Denali & Kenai Peninsula - 5th to 13th June 2016 (9 days) Scenic Alaska by Sid Padgaonkar Trip Leader(s): Forrest Rowland and Forrest Davis RBT Alaska – Trip Report 2016 2 Top Ten Birds of the Tour: 1. Smith’s Longspur 2. Spectacled Eider 3. Bluethroat 4. Gyrfalcon 5. White-tailed Ptarmigan 6. Snowy Owl 7. Ivory Gull 8. Bristle-thighed Curlew 9. Arctic Warbler 10. Red Phalarope It would be very difficult to accurately describe a tour around Alaska - without drowning the narrative in superlatives to the point of nuisance. Not only is it an inconceivably huge area to describe, but the habitats and landscapes, though far north and less biodiverse than the tropics, are completely unique from one portion of the tour to the next. Though I will do my best, I will fail to encapsulate what it’s like to, for example, watch a coastal glacier calving into the Pacific, while being observed by Harbour Seals and on-looking Murrelets. I can’t accurately describe the sense of wilderness felt looking across the vast glacial valleys and tundra mountains of Nome, with Long- tailed Jaegers hovering overhead, a Rock Ptarmigan incubating eggs near our feet, and Muskoxen staring at us strangers to these arctic expanses. Finally, there is Denali: squinting across jagged snowy ridges that tower above 10,000 feet, mere dwarfs beneath Denali standing 20,300 feet high, making everything else in view seem small, even toy-like, by comparison.
    [Show full text]
  • Der Steppengrashüpfer, Chorthippus Vagans
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Göttinger Naturkundliche Schriften Jahr/Year: 1994 Band/Volume: 3 Autor(en)/Author(s): Meineke Thomas, Menge Kerstin, Grein Günter Artikel/Article: Der Steppengrashüpfer, Chorthippus vagans (Eversmann, 1848), (Insecta: Orthoptera) im und am Harz gefunden 45-53 Göttinger Naturkundliche Schriften3, 1994: 4 5 - 53 © 1994 Biologische Schutzgemeinschaft Göttingen Der Steppengrashüpfer, Chorthippus vagans (Ev ersm a n n , 1848), (Insecta: Orthoptera) im und am Harz gefunden* The Heath Grasshopper, Chorthippus vagans (E v e r s m a n n , 1848), (Insecta: Orthoptera) recorded in the Harz mountains Thomas Meineke, Kerstin Menge und Günter Grein The Heath Grasshopper, Chorthippus vagans, was recorded in and around the Harz mountains. Distribution, status and habitats are described and discussed. 1. Einleitung und Dorset) (MARSHALL & Haes 1988), Nord-Frankreich (Flandern) (Duijm & Der Steppengrashüpfer wurde in den Kruseman 1983), den Niederlanden meisten Teilen Süd- wie Mitteleuropas (Gelderland) (Hermes & Fliervoet 1987), und ostwärts bis in den Südteil der Nord-Jütland (Skagen, Dänemark) Sowjetunion nachgewiesen (Harz 1975). (Holst 1986) und Nord-Polen (Raum Aufgrund der meist kleinen und oft weit Danzig) (Zacher 1917) markiert. voneinander entfernt lebenden Popula­ In Niedersachsen wurde Chorthippus tionen gilt die Feldheuschreckenart in vagans bisher in 21 Meßtischblatt-Qua­ Mitteleuropa jedoch als relativ selten dranten beobachtet, und zwar in den (Bellmann 1985). Bereichen Lingen/Ems, Sage in Süd- Die nördliche Arealgrenze wird nach Oldenburg, Steinhuder Meer, Elbdünen den gegenwärtigen Kenntnissen durch zwischen Hitzacker und Bleckede, Göhr­ Fundorte in Süd-England (Hampshire de und Drawehn sowie um Gifhorn (vgl. *) 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Acoustic Tagging of Large Sharks – Potential for Acoustic Interference
    CITIZEN SCIENCE – CS 05-11-17) Acoustic tagging of large sharks – Potential for acoustic interference (CS 05-11-17) – Kim Allen independent researcher Citizen science overview This paper is one of a series of unfunded, independent research initiatives that question mainstream science, Animal ethics approaches and Governments’ apparent acceptance of “Validated” science in the area of wildlife electronic tracking. Clearly, the Australian shark issue is extremely contentious as well as political and emotionally charged. Over $100 million has been expended by State and Federal governments in an attempt to find answers and make our beaches safer. Unfortunately, at no stage has a strategic approach been taken to identify the key disciplines of science that need to be considered, assessed, and applied. Significant investment has been directed into the construction and support of wide-scale acoustic receiver arrays and individual sensors as well as significant tagging of large sharks off our coastline for research and public safety. Previous satellite archival tagging programs conducted by CSIRO gave us good insight into shark movements, however since this time despite significant investment minimal progress appears to have been made and the potential risks appear to have been ignored. This CSIRO document clearly outlines the types of tags that are used for shark research, it also clearly defines the recommended protocols that should be used for shark tagging operations. From photographic details shared in the public domain it is clear that shark tagging operations undertaken by Fisheries departments don’t follow these stringent protocols. (www.cmar.csiro.au/e-print/open/2009/bradfordrw a.pdf ) It is extremely difficult for “Unqualified” Citizen scientists to challenge mainstream research particularly given the potential erosion of future funding sources if technical criticism is determined as valid.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 75/Wednesday, April 21, 2021
    21082 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 21, 2021 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa Network, and the Wishtoyo Foundation Manning, NMFS, Office of Protected filed a complaint seeking court-ordered National Oceanic and Atmospheric Resources, 301–427–8466. deadlines for the issuance of proposed Administration SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: and final rules to designate critical habitat for the CAM, MX, and WNP 50 CFR Parts 223, 224, and 226 Background DPSs of humpback whales. See Center Under the ESA, we are responsible for for Biological Diversity et al. v. National [Docket No. 210415–0080] determining whether certain species are Marine Fisheries Service, et al., No. threatened or endangered, and, to the 3:18–cv–01628–EDL (N.D. Cal.). The RIN 0648–BI06 maximum extent prudent and parties entered into a settlement determinable, designating critical agreement with the approval and Endangered and Threatened Wildlife habitat for endangered and threatened oversight of the court, and subsequently and Plants: Designating Critical species at the time of listing (16 U.S.C. amended the dates specified in the Habitat for the Central America, 1533(a)(3)(A)(i)). On September 8, 2016, original order. The amended settlement Mexico, and Western North Pacific we published a final rule that revised agreement stipulated that NMFS submit Distinct Population Segments of the listing of humpback whales under a proposed determination concerning Humpback Whales the ESA by removing the original, the designation of critical habitat for taxonomic-level species listing, and in these three DPSs to the Federal Register AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries its place listing four DPSs as endangered by September 26, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander 2013 Principles-Of-Animal-Locomotion.Pdf
    .................................................... Principles of Animal Locomotion Principles of Animal Locomotion ..................................................... R. McNeill Alexander PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS PRINCETON AND OXFORD Copyright © 2003 by Princeton University Press Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, 3 Market Place, Woodstock, Oxfordshire OX20 1SY All Rights Reserved Second printing, and first paperback printing, 2006 Paperback ISBN-13: 978-0-691-12634-0 Paperback ISBN-10: 0-691-12634-8 The Library of Congress has cataloged the cloth edition of this book as follows Alexander, R. McNeill. Principles of animal locomotion / R. McNeill Alexander. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references (p. ). ISBN 0-691-08678-8 (alk. paper) 1. Animal locomotion. I. Title. QP301.A2963 2002 591.47′9—dc21 2002016904 British Library Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available This book has been composed in Galliard and Bulmer Printed on acid-free paper. ∞ pup.princeton.edu Printed in the United States of America 1098765432 Contents ............................................................... PREFACE ix Chapter 1. The Best Way to Travel 1 1.1. Fitness 1 1.2. Speed 2 1.3. Acceleration and Maneuverability 2 1.4. Endurance 4 1.5. Economy of Energy 7 1.6. Stability 8 1.7. Compromises 9 1.8. Constraints 9 1.9. Optimization Theory 10 1.10. Gaits 12 Chapter 2. Muscle, the Motor 15 2.1. How Muscles Exert Force 15 2.2. Shortening and Lengthening Muscle 22 2.3. Power Output of Muscles 26 2.4. Pennation Patterns and Moment Arms 28 2.5. Power Consumption 31 2.6. Some Other Types of Muscle 34 Chapter 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Invertebrates of Slapton Ley National Nature Reserve (Fsc) and Prawle Point (National Trust)
    CLARK & BECCALONI (2018). FIELD STUDIES (http://fsj.field-studies-council.org/) INVERTEBRATES OF SLAPTON LEY NATIONAL NATURE RESERVE (FSC) AND PRAWLE POINT (NATIONAL TRUST) RACHEL J. CLARK AND JANET BECCALONI Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD. In 2014 the Natural History Museum, London organised a field trip to Slapton. These field notes report on the trip, giving details of methodology, the species collected and those of notable status. INTRODUCTION OBjectives A field trip to Slapton was organised, funded and undertaken by the Natural History Museum, London (NHM) in July 2014. The main objective was to acquire tissues of UK invertebrates for the Molecular Collections Facility (MCF) at the NHM. The other objectives were to: 1. Acquire specimens of hitherto under-represented species in the NHM collection; 2. Provide UK invertebrate records for the Field Studies Council (FSC), local wildlife trusts, Natural England, the National Trust and the National Biodiversity Network (NBN) Gateway; 3. Develop a partnership between these organisations and the NHM; 4. Publish records of new/under-recorded species for the area in Field Studies (the publication of the FSC). Background to the NHM collections The NHM is home to over 80 million specimens and objects. The Museum uses best practice in curating and preserving specimens for perpetuity. In 2012 the Molecular Collections Facilities (MCF) was opened at the NHM. The MCF houses a variety of material including botanical, entomological and zoological tissues in state-of-the-art freezers ranging in temperature from -20ºC and -80ºC to -150ºC (Figs. 1). As well as tissues, a genomic DNA collection is also being developed.
    [Show full text]
  • 165 Cold Feet
    Cold Feet: Addressing the Effect of Human Activity in Antarctica on Terrestrial Wildlife 165 cold feet: addressing the effect of human actiVity in antarctica on terrestrial wildlife andrew J. Koper* i. introduction “‘Great [G]od! This is an awful place.’”1 Those were some of Captain Robert Falcon Scott’s last words after he arrived at the South Pole.2 Not long after Scott entered those words into his journal, his team died off from the cold.3 One of the men, Captain Lawrence Oates, wished to die in his sleep, but after awaking, stated his famous outside and may be some time.”4 The rest of the team perished soon after Oates.5 simple mistake in Antarctica can lead to death.6 But while humans are not well suited to survive in Antarctica without life support supplies,7 others have adapted to thrive in the frigid environment. and simple vegetation have gained a foothold.8 Humans have entered portion of the continent that can foster life.9 Humans and animals interact to Professor Finkmoore for guiding me down the path to what ultimately became this Article. Thanks to Matt Springmeyer, who provided invaluable help to me in editing my fourth draft, and to Jacob Harding, without whom none of this would have been possible. Special thanks to my Oma and Opa, who provided a very comfortable study to the staff of the Journal of Animal & Natural Resource Law for their editing work. 1 Gabrielle Walker, The Great Thaw, n.y. times (June 21, 2012), http://www. 2 Id. 3 Id.
    [Show full text]
  • 0251 AES Behavior & Ecology, 552 AB, Friday 9 July 2010 Jeff
    0251 AES Behavior & Ecology, 552 AB, Friday 9 July 2010 Jeff Kneebone1, Gregory Skomal2, John Chisholm2 1University of Massachusetts Dartmouth; School for Marine Science and Technology, New Bedford, Massachusetts, United States, 2Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries, New Bedford, Massachusetts, United States Spatial and Temporal Habitat Use and Movement Patterns of Neonatal and Juvenile Sand Tiger Sharks, Carcharias taurus, in a Massachusetts Estuary In recent years, an increasing number of neonate and juvenile sand tiger sharks (Carcharias taurus) have been incidentally taken by fishermen in Plymouth, Kingston, Duxbury (PKD) Bay, a 10,200 acre tidal estuary located on the south shore of Massachusetts. There are indications that the strong seasonal presence (late spring to early fall) of sand tigers in this area is a relatively new phenomenon as local fishermen claim that they had never seen this species in large numbers until recently. We utilized passive acoustic telemetry to monitor seasonal residency, habitat use, site fidelity, and fine scale movements of 35 sand tigers (79 – 120 cm fork length; age 0 - 1) in PKD Bay. Sharks were tracked within PKD Bay for periods of 5 – 88 days during September – October, 2008 and June – October, 2009. All movement data are currently being analyzed to quantify spatial and temporal habitat use, however, preliminary analyses suggest that sharks display a high degree of site fidelity to several areas of PKD Bay. Outside PKD Bay, we documented broader regional movements throughout New England. Collectively, these data demonstrate the that both PKD Bay and New England coastal waters serve as nursery and essential fish habitat (EFH) for neonatal and juvenile sand tiger sharks.
    [Show full text]
  • Biomechanics of Terrestrial Locomotion: Asymmetric Octopedal and Quadrupedal Gaits
    SCUOLA DI DOTTORATO IN SCIENZE MORFOLOGICHE, FISIOLOGICHE E DELLO SPORT DIPARTIMENTO DI FISIOLOGIA UMANA DOTTORATO DI RICERCA IN FISIOLOGIA CICLO XXIV Biomechanics of terrestrial locomotion: asymmetric octopedal and quadrupedal gaits SETTORE SCIENTIFICO DISCIPLINARE BIO-09 PhD Student: Dott. Carlo M. Biancardi Matricola: R08161 Tutor: Prof. Alberto E. Minetti Coordinatore: Prof. Paolo Cavallari Anno Accademico 2010-2011 Table of Contents Abstract...................................................................................................... 5 Introduction ...............................................................................................8 Foreword.................................................................................................................. 8 Objectives .................................................................................................................8 Thesis structure........................................................................................................ 8 Terrestrial legged locomotion ..................................................................9 Introduction .............................................................................................................9 Energetics and mechanics of terrestrial legged locomotion ................................10 Limbs mechanics ..........................................................................................................10 Size differences .............................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • AJ3 – M Fournet, Karpowership Marine Acoustic Ecology Expert Input
    "AJ3" JUDICIAL REVIEW – ENVIRONMENTAL AUTHORISATION FOR THREE PROPOSED GAS TO POWER POWERSHIP PROJECTS LED BY KARPOWERSHIP SA (PTY) LTD – MARINE ACOUSTIC ECOLOGY EXPERT INPUT Michelle Fournet, M.S., PhD OVERVIEW: This report contains an expert opinion assessing the scientific soundness of activities relating to three Gas to Power - Powership Projects led by Karpowership SA (PTY) Ltd. The proposed project locations include: (1) Port of Ngqura (on the Southeastern side of South Africa), (2) Richards Bay (near Durban), and (3) in Saldanha Bay (near Cape Town on the West Coast of South Africa). The projects involve the generation of electricity by means of mobile Powerships to be berthed in the marine environment. Additional components of the projects include Floating Storage Regasification Units (FSRU), gas pipelines, and a Liquid Natural GasCarrier (LNGC), which will all interact with marine ecosystems. Specifically, this report is concerned with whether the marine ecology assessments and noise impact assessments (hereafter ‘the studies’) and the associated environmental impact assessment reports (EIAs) adequately assessed the environmental impact of anthropogenic noise and vibrations associated with the proposed projects and associated activities. Noise and vibrations will be broadly addressed, with specific emphasis on suitability of the EIAs to address impacts to the marine environment. These projects collectively rely on a single technical study to predict possible noise levels emanating from the powership, repeat language and mitigation strategies, and rely on the same scientific and technical references. As such, this report will address the three independent EIAs and the associated studies collectively, noting differences in the ecology of the three regions as needed, since site specific assessments of marine noise impacts were omitted from all three EIAs and associated studies.
    [Show full text]