DOCSLIB.ORG

Diagnostic Report’ to Guide Improvements to the Regular Reporting Process on the State of the Black Sea Environment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Diagnostic Report’ to Guide Improvements to the Regular Reporting Process on the State of the Black Sea Environment Commission on the Protection of the Black Sea Against Pollution Permanent Secretariat Final ‘Diagnostic Report’ to guide improvements to the regular reporting process on the state of the Black Sea environment Date: 03 th August 2010 1 List of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................................................ 7 ITRODUCTIO............................................................................................................................................................12 SECTIO I: BSIMAP AD BSIS ..................................................................................................................................16 SECTIO II: MOITORIG, DATA FLOWS TO THE BSC AD IDICATORS: ACHIEVEMETS AD THE BOTTLEECKS..............................................................................................................................................................27 II.1. MONITORING ..............................................................................................................................................27 II.1.1. Regional monitoring ..........................................................................................................................27 II.1.2. ational monitoring systems – status quo, gaps in data collected.....................................................29 II.1.2.1. Bulgaria....................................................................................................................................................... 31 II.1.2.2. Georgia ....................................................................................................................................................... 31 II.1.2.3. Romania...................................................................................................................................................... 32 II.1.2.4. Russian Federation...................................................................................................................................... 33 II.1.2.5. Turkey......................................................................................................................................................... 34 II.1.2.6. Ukraine ....................................................................................................................................................... 35 II.2. DATA FLOW TO THE BSC............................................................................................................................37 II.3. DATA OUTSIDE OF THE OFFICIAL REPORTING ..............................................................................................38 II. 4. PROJECT RELATED MONITORING AND DATA BASES CREATED IN THE BLACK SEA REGION SINCE 2001.......52 II.5. QUALITY CONTROL /ASSURANCE .................................................................................................................52 II.6. SUITABILITY OF DATA FOR CALCULATING INDICATORS ..............................................................................53 II.6.1 utrients..............................................................................................................................................53 II.6.2 Dissolved oxygen - hypoxia.................................................................................................................59 II.6.3 Chlorophyll – in situ & observed........................................................................................................60 II.6.4 Biodiversity .........................................................................................................................................64 II.6.5. Fisheries and aquaculture .................................................................................................................67 II.6.6 Hazardous Substances in biota (and sediments)................................................................................69 II.6.7 LBS inputs from direct and riverine sources......................................................................................72 II.6.8. Inputs from shipping ..........................................................................................................................77 II.6.9 Climate change impact indicators .....................................................................................................78 II.6.10 Bathing waters .................................................................................................................................85 SECTIO III: COCLUSIOS AD RECOMMEDATIOS................................................................................ 86 AEX I: PROJECTS I THE BLACK SEA REGIO...........................................................................................102 AEX II. BSIMAP MADATORY AD OPTIOAL PARAMETERS .............................................................140 AEX III : META DATA SUBMITTED TO THE BSC .........................................................................................149 AEX IV. FISHERY REPORT O SUITABILITY OF BSIS DATA FOR CALCULATIO OF IDICATORS165 AEX V: ORTHWARD MOVEMET OF SPECIES .........................................................................................185 AEX VI: PROPOSED EW IDICATORS FROM THE BLACK SEA............................................................204 AEX VII: ‘FORWARD’ LOOKIG AT MSFD (AEX I)................................................................................208 2 List of Figures Figure 1. BSIMAP monitoring stations .................................................................................................................................... 28 Figure 2. Map of sampling stations in Bulgarian Black Sea waters.......................................................................................... 31 Figure 3. Map of monitoring stations in Romanian Black Sea waters...................................................................................... 32 Figure 4. Maps of stations monitored by the Centers in Tuapse (1-5) and Sochi (last scheme) in Russian Black Sea waters. ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 34 Figure 5. Map of sampling stations in Turkish Black Sea waters............................................................................................. 35 Figure 6. Map of sampling stations in Ukrainian Black Sea waters. ........................................................................................ 36 Figure 7. Map of sampling stations observed by IO-BAS in Bulgarian Black Sea waters ....................................................... 41 Figure 8. Map of sampling stations monitored by IFR-Varna in Bulgarian Black Sea waters: (1) transects Kaliakra (1), Galata (2), Emine (3); Bourgas Bay (second figure). ............................................................................................................... 42 Figure 9. Map of Varna/Beloslav Lakes and Varna Bay ......................................................................................................... 42 Figure 10. Map of sampling stations observed by CLOE in Bulgarian Black Sea waters ........................................................ 43 Figure 11. Map of sampling stations in the Eastern, Central and Western Black Sea, observed by the Gelendjik Institute..... 45 Figure 12. Map of sampling area covered by the Shirshov Institute and the “standard” monitoring transect in front of Gelendjik (second figure)......................................................................................................................................................... 45 Figure 13. Map of sampling points in the Novorossiysk Bay and along the Russian coast...................................................... 46 Figure 14. Map of sampling stations in the Black and Azov Seas............................................................................................ 47 Figure 15. Map of sampling stations observed by IMS/METU in Turkish Black Sea waters. ................................................. 48 Figure 16. Map of sampling stations in the vicinity of Sinop................................................................................................... 49 Figure 17. Map of regular (●) and episodical (▲) studies of parameters of the environment in the coastal zone of Crimea performed by the Department of Applied Oceanology and Aquaculture, IBSS NANU.......................................................... 50 Figure 18. Sampling locations around the Island of Zmeiniy in 2004-2009: UA, external data............................................... 51 Figure 19. Interannual changes of upper layer concentrations of inorganic species of N, P, Si in the North-Eastern Black Sea averaged for the 5-years intervals. ..................................................................................................................................... 57 Figure 20. N/P ratio seasonal dynamics at Sulina in 1990-1997 compared to 1998-2003 (NW Black Sea), data A. Cociasu, NIMRD, Constanta, Romania.(A); N/P ratio dynamics in 0-5 m layer in the NE Black Sea in 1989-2006 (B). ....... 58 Figure 21. Long-term variability of phosphorus, silica and nitrogen species in Romanian waters........................................... 58 Figure 22. Long-term variations of spatial coverage of hypoxia in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Trends of Aquatic Alien Species Invasions in Ukraine
    Aquatic Invasions (2007) Volume 2, Issue 3: 215-242 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/ai.2007.2.3.8 Open Access © 2007 The Author(s) Journal compilation © 2007 REABIC Research Article Trends of aquatic alien species invasions in Ukraine Boris Alexandrov1*, Alexandr Boltachev2, Taras Kharchenko3, Artiom Lyashenko3, Mikhail Son1, Piotr Tsarenko4 and Valeriy Zhukinsky3 1Odessa Branch, Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (NASU); 37, Pushkinska St, 65125 Odessa, Ukraine 2Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas NASU; 2, Nakhimova avenue, 99011 Sevastopol, Ukraine 3Institute of Hydrobiology NASU; 12, Geroyiv Stalingrada avenue, 04210 Kiyv, Ukraine 4Institute of Botany NASU; 2, Tereschenkivska St, 01601 Kiyv, Ukraine E-mail: [email protected] (BA), [email protected] (AB), [email protected] (TK, AL), [email protected] (PT) *Corresponding author Received: 13 November 2006 / Accepted: 2 August 2007 Abstract This review is a first attempt to summarize data on the records and distribution of 240 alien species in fresh water, brackish water and marine water areas of Ukraine, from unicellular algae up to fish. A checklist of alien species with their taxonomy, synonymy and with a complete bibliography of their first records is presented. Analysis of the main trends of alien species introduction, present ecological status, origin and pathways is considered. Key words: alien species, ballast water, Black Sea, distribution, invasion, Sea of Azov introduction of plants and animals to new areas Introduction increased over the ages. From the beginning of the 19th century, due to The range of organisms of different taxonomic rising technical progress, the influence of man groups varies with time, which can be attributed on nature has increased in geometrical to general processes of phylogenesis, to changes progression, gradually becoming comparable in in the contours of land and sea, forest and dimensions to climate impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Copepod Distribution and Production in a Mid-Atlantic Ridge Archipelago
    Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (2014) 86(4): 1719-1733 (Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences) Printed version ISSN 0001-3765 / Online version ISSN 1678-2690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201420130395 www.scielo.br/aabc Copepod distribution and production in a Mid-Atlantic Ridge archipelago PEDRO A.M.C. MELO1, MAURO DE MELO JÚNIOR2, SILVIO J. DE MACÊDO1, MOACYR ARAUJO1 and SIGRID NEUMANN-LEITÃO1 1Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Departamento de Oceanografia, Av. Arquitetura, s/n, Cidade Universitária, 50670-901 Recife, PE, Brasil 2Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Unidade Acadêmica de Serra Talhada, Fazenda Saco, s/n, Zona Rural, 56903-970 Serra Talhada, PE, Brasil Manuscript received on October 3, 2013; accepted for publication on March 11, 2014 ABSTRACT The Saint Peter and Saint Paul Archipelago (SPSPA) are located close to the Equator in the Atlantic Ocean. The aim of this study was to assess the spatial variations in the copepod community abundance, and the biomass and production patterns of the three most abundant calanoid species in the SPSPA. Plankton samples were collected with a 300 µm mesh size net along four transects (north, east, south and west of the SPSPA), with four stations plotted in each transect. All transects exhibited a tendency toward a decrease in copepod density with increasing distance from the SPSPA, statistically proved in the North. Density varied from 3.33 to 182.18 ind.m-3, and differences were also found between the first perimeter (first circular distance band) and the others. The total biomass varied from 15.25 to 524.50 10-3 mg C m-3 and production from 1.19 to 22.04 10-3 mg C m-3d-1.
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratory Reference Module Summary Report LR22
    Laboratory Reference Module Summary Report Benthic Invertebrate Component - 2017/18 LR22 26 March 2018 Author: Tim Worsfold Reviewer: David Hall, NMBAQCS Project Manager Approved by: Myles O'Reilly, Contract Manager, SEPA Contact: [email protected] MODULE / EXERCISE DETAILS Module: Laboratory Reference (LR) Exercises: LR22 Data/Sample Request Circulated: 10th July 2017 Sample Submission Deadline: 31st August 2017 Number of Subscribing Laboratories: 7 Number of LR Received: 4 Contents Table 1. Summary of mis-identified taxa in the Laboratory Reference module (LR22) (erroneous identifications in brackets). Table 2. Summary of identification policy differences in the Laboratory Reference Module (LR22) (original identifications in brackets). Appendix. LR22 individual summary reports for participating laboratories. Table 1. Summary of mis-identified taxa in the Laboratory Reference Module (LR22) (erroneous identifications in brackets). Taxonomic Major Taxonomic Group LabCode Edits Polychaeta Oligochaeta Crustacea Mollusca Other Spio symphyta (Spio filicornis ) - Leucothoe procera (Leucothoe ?richardii ) - - Scolelepis bonnieri (Scolelepis squamata ) - - - - BI_2402 5 Laonice (Laonice sarsi ) - - - - Dipolydora (Dipolydora flava ) - - - - Goniada emerita (Goniadella bobrezkii ) - Nebalia reboredae (Nebalia bipes ) - - Polydora sp. A (Polydora cornuta ) - Diastylis rathkei (Diastylis cornuta ) - - BI_2403 7 Syllides? (Anoplosyllis edentula ) - Abludomelita obtusata (Tryphosa nana ) - in mixture - - Spirorbinae (Ditrupa arietina ) - - - -
    [Show full text]
  • The Plankton Lifeform Extraction Tool: a Digital Tool to Increase The
    Discussions https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2021-171 Earth System Preprint. Discussion started: 21 July 2021 Science c Author(s) 2021. CC BY 4.0 License. Open Access Open Data The Plankton Lifeform Extraction Tool: A digital tool to increase the discoverability and usability of plankton time-series data Clare Ostle1*, Kevin Paxman1, Carolyn A. Graves2, Mathew Arnold1, Felipe Artigas3, Angus Atkinson4, Anaïs Aubert5, Malcolm Baptie6, Beth Bear7, Jacob Bedford8, Michael Best9, Eileen 5 Bresnan10, Rachel Brittain1, Derek Broughton1, Alexandre Budria5,11, Kathryn Cook12, Michelle Devlin7, George Graham1, Nick Halliday1, Pierre Hélaouët1, Marie Johansen13, David G. Johns1, Dan Lear1, Margarita Machairopoulou10, April McKinney14, Adam Mellor14, Alex Milligan7, Sophie Pitois7, Isabelle Rombouts5, Cordula Scherer15, Paul Tett16, Claire Widdicombe4, and Abigail McQuatters-Gollop8 1 10 The Marine Biological Association (MBA), The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB, UK. 2 Centre for Environment Fisheries and Aquacu∑lture Science (Cefas), Weymouth, UK. 3 Université du Littoral Côte d’Opale, Université de Lille, CNRS UMR 8187 LOG, Laboratoire d’Océanologie et de Géosciences, Wimereux, France. 4 Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, Plymouth, PL1 3DH, UK. 5 15 Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle (MNHN), CRESCO, 38 UMS Patrinat, Dinard, France. 6 Scottish Environment Protection Agency, Angus Smith Building, Maxim 6, Parklands Avenue, Eurocentral, Holytown, North Lanarkshire ML1 4WQ, UK. 7 Centre for Environment Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Lowestoft, UK. 8 Marine Conservation Research Group, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK. 9 20 The Environment Agency, Kingfisher House, Goldhay Way, Peterborough, PE4 6HL, UK. 10 Marine Scotland Science, Marine Laboratory, 375 Victoria Road, Aberdeen, AB11 9DB, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Life-Cycle Analysis of Pacific Ocean Zooplankton by Video Microscopy and DNA Barcoding: Crustacea
    Journal of Aquaculture & Marine Biology Research Article Open Access Diversity and life-cycle analysis of Pacific Ocean zooplankton by video microscopy and DNA barcoding: Crustacea Abstract Volume 10 Issue 3 - 2021 Determining the DNA sequencing of a small element in the mitochondrial DNA (DNA Peter Bryant,1 Timothy Arehart2 barcoding) makes it possible to easily identify individuals of different larval stages of 1Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of marine crustaceans without the need for laboratory rearing. It can also be used to construct California, USA taxonomic trees, although it is not yet clear to what extent this barcode-based taxonomy 2Crystal Cove Conservancy, Newport Coast, CA, USA reflects more traditional morphological or molecular taxonomy. Collections of zooplankton were made using conventional plankton nets in Newport Bay and the Pacific Ocean near Correspondence: Peter Bryant, Department of Newport Beach, California (Lat. 33.628342, Long. -117.927933) between May 2013 and Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, USA, January 2020, and individual crustacean specimens were documented by video microscopy. Email Adult crustaceans were collected from solid substrates in the same areas. Specimens were preserved in ethanol and sent to the Canadian Centre for DNA Barcoding at the Received: June 03, 2021 | Published: July 26, 2021 University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada for sequencing of the COI DNA barcode. From 1042 specimens, 544 COI sequences were obtained falling into 199 Barcode Identification Numbers (BINs), of which 76 correspond to recognized species. For 15 species of decapods (Loxorhynchus grandis, Pelia tumida, Pugettia dalli, Metacarcinus anthonyi, Metacarcinus gracilis, Pachygrapsus crassipes, Pleuroncodes planipes, Lophopanopeus sp., Pinnixa franciscana, Pinnixa tubicola, Pagurus longicarpus, Petrolisthes cabrilloi, Portunus xantusii, Hemigrapsus oregonensis, Heptacarpus brevirostris), DNA barcoding allowed the matching of different life-cycle stages (zoea, megalops, adult).
    [Show full text]
  • Central Mediterranean Sea) Subtidal Cliff: a First, Tardy, Report
    Biodiversity Journal , 2018, 9 (1): 25–34 Mollusc diversity in Capo d’Armi (Central Mediterranean Sea) subtidal cliff: a first, tardy, report Salvatore Giacobbe 1 & Walter Renda 2 ¹Department of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences, University of Messina, Viale F. Stagno d’Al - contres 31, 98166 Messina, Italy; e-mail: [email protected] 2Via Bologna, 18/A, 87032 Amantea, Cosenza, Italy; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT First quantitative data on mollusc assemblages from the Capo d’Armi cliff, at the south en - trance of the Strait of Messina, provided a baseline for monitoring changes in benthic biod- iversity of a crucial Mediterranean area, whose depletion might already be advanced. A total of 133 benthic taxa have been recorded, and their distribution evaluated according to depth and seasonality. Bathymetric distribution showed scanty differences between the 4-6 meters and 12-16 meters depth levels, sharing all the 22 most abundant species. Season markedly affected species composition, since 42 taxa were exclusively recorded in spring and 35 in autumn, contrary to 56 shared taxa. The occurrence of some uncommon taxa has also been discussed. The benthic mollusc assemblages, although sampled in Ionian Sea, showed a clear western species composition, in accordance with literature placing east of the Strait the bound- ary line between western and eastern Mediterranean eco-regions. Opposite, occasional records of six mesopelagic species, which included the first record for this area of Atlanta helicinoi - dea
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
    [Show full text]
  • Fatty Acid and Alcohol Composition of the Small Polar Copepods, Oithona and Oncaea : Indication on Feeding Modes
    Polar Biol (2003) 26: 666–671 DOI 10.1007/s00300-003-0540-x ORIGINAL PAPER G. Kattner Æ C. Albers Æ M. Graeve S. B. Schnack-Schiel Fatty acid and alcohol composition of the small polar copepods, Oithona and Oncaea : indication on feeding modes Received: 2 April 2003 / Accepted: 28 July 2003 / Published online: 27 August 2003 Ó Springer-Verlag 2003 Abstract The fatty acid and alcohol compositions of the (Paffenho¨ fer 1993). They occur from the polar seas to Antarctic copepods Oithona similis, Oncaea curvata, tropical regions at both hemispheres. Species of both Oncaea antarctica and the Arctic Oncaea borealis were genera can reach high concentrations, exceeding 5,000 determined to provide the first data on their lipid bio- individuals m)3 (Dagg et al. 1980; Koga 1986; chemistry and to expand the present knowledge on their Paffenho¨ fer 1993; Metz 1996). The high abundance of feeding modes and life-cycle strategies. All these tiny these tiny species compensates for the low biomass and, species contained high amounts of wax esters (on average thus, the populations can reach biomass levels of the 51.4–86.3% of total lipid), except females of Oithona same order as dominant calanoid species (Metz 1996). In similis (15.2%). The fatty-acid composition was clearly the Southern Ocean, Oithonidae and Oncaeidae can dominated by 18:1(n-9), especially in the wax-ester-rich account for between 20 and 24% of the total copepod Oncaea curvata (79.7% of total fatty acids). In all species, biomass (Schnack-Schiel et al. 1998). 16:0 and the polyunsaturated fatty acids 20:5(n-3) and The epipelagic species, Oithona similis, has been de- 22:6(n-3), which are structural components of all mem- scribed as the most numerous and widely distributed branes, occurred in significant proportions.
    [Show full text]
  • Tesi Di Dottorato Di: Tutor: Laura Carugati Prof
    Scuola di Dottorato di Ricerca in SCIENZE Curriculum BIOLOGIA ed ECOLOGIA MARINA XIV° ciclo n.s. Molecular analysis of marine benthic biodiversity: methodological implementations and perspectives Tesi di Dottorato di: Tutor: Laura Carugati Prof. Roberto Danovaro Co-Tutor: Prof. Antonio Dell’Anno A.A. 2016/2017 Index RIASSUNTO ............................................................................................................................................ 3 ABSTRACT .............................................................................................................................................. 4 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 5 1.1 A comparison of the degree of implementation of marine biodiversity indicators by European countries in relation to the MSFD ....................................................................................................... 13 1.2 Indicator-based assessment of marine biological diversity – lessons from 10 case studies across the European Seas ............................................................................................................................... 39 CHAPTER 2. METHODOLOGICAL IMPLEMENTATION ............................................................... 92 2.1 Implementing and innovating marine monitoring approaches for the assessment of the environmental status ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Endemik Beyşehir Kurbağası Pelophylax Caralitanus (Arıkan,1988) Populasyonlarında Comet Analizi Ile DNA Hasarın Değerlendirilmesi Uğur Cengiz Erişmiş
    Instructions for Authors Scope of the Journal if there is more than one author at the end of the text. Su Ürünleri Dergisi (Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences) is an open access, international, Hanging indent paragraph style should be used. The year of the reference should be in parentheses double blind peer-reviewed journal publishing original research articles, short communications, after the author name(s). The correct arrangement of the reference list elements should be in order technical notes, reports and reviews in all aspects of fisheries and aquatic sciences including biology, as “Author surname, first letter of the name(s). (publication date). Title of work. Publication data. DOI ecology, biogeography, inland, marine and crustacean aquaculture, fish nutrition, disease and Article title should be in sentence case and the journal title should be in title case. Journal titles in the treatment, capture fisheries, fishing technology, management and economics, seafood processing, Reference List must be italicized and spelled out fully; do not abbreviate titles (e.g., Ege Journal of chemistry, microbiology, algal biotechnology, protection of organisms living in marine, brackish and Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, not Ege J Fish Aqua Sci). Article titles are not italicized. If the journal is freshwater habitats, pollution studies. paginated by issue the issue number should be in parentheses. Su Ürünleri Dergisi (EgeJFAS) is published quarterly (March, June, September and December) by Ege DOI information (if available) should be placed at the end of the reference as in the example. The DOI University Faculty of Fisheries since 1984. information for the reference list can be retrieved from CrossRef © Simple Text Query Form (http:// Submission of Manuscripts www.crossref.org/SimpleTextQuery/) by just pasting the reference list into the query box.
    [Show full text]
  • (Approx) Mixed Micro Shells (22G Bags) Philippines € 10,00 £8,64 $11,69 Each 22G Bag Provides Hours of Fun; Some Interesting Foraminifera Also Included
    Special Price £ US$ Family Genus, species Country Quality Size Remarks w/o Photo Date added Category characteristic (€) (approx) (approx) Mixed micro shells (22g bags) Philippines € 10,00 £8,64 $11,69 Each 22g bag provides hours of fun; some interesting Foraminifera also included. 17/06/21 Mixed micro shells Ischnochitonidae Callistochiton pulchrior Panama F+++ 89mm € 1,80 £1,55 $2,10 21/12/16 Polyplacophora Ischnochitonidae Chaetopleura lurida Panama F+++ 2022mm € 3,00 £2,59 $3,51 Hairy girdles, beautifully preserved. Web 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Ischnochitonidae Ischnochiton textilis South Africa F+++ 30mm+ € 4,00 £3,45 $4,68 30/04/21 Polyplacophora Ischnochitonidae Ischnochiton textilis South Africa F+++ 27.9mm € 2,80 £2,42 $3,27 30/04/21 Polyplacophora Ischnochitonidae Stenoplax limaciformis Panama F+++ 16mm+ € 6,50 £5,61 $7,60 Uncommon. 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Acanthopleura gemmata Philippines F+++ 25mm+ € 2,50 £2,16 $2,92 Hairy margins, beautifully preserved. 04/08/17 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Acanthopleura gemmata Australia F+++ 25mm+ € 2,60 £2,25 $3,04 02/06/18 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Acanthopleura granulata Panama F+++ 41mm+ € 4,00 £3,45 $4,68 West Indian 'fuzzy' chiton. Web 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Acanthopleura granulata Panama F+++ 32mm+ € 3,00 £2,59 $3,51 West Indian 'fuzzy' chiton. 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Chiton tuberculatus Panama F+++ 44mm+ € 5,00 £4,32 $5,85 Caribbean. 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Chiton tuberculatus Panama F++ 35mm € 2,50 £2,16 $2,92 Caribbean. 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Chiton tuberculatus Panama F+++ 29mm+ € 3,00 £2,59 $3,51 Caribbean.
    [Show full text]
  • North of Celtic Deep Rmcz Post-Survey Site Report V3
    North of Celtic Deep rMCZ Post-survey Site Report Contract Reference: MB0120 Report Number: 49 Version 3 September 2017 Project Title: Marine Protected Areas Data and Evidence Co-ordination Programme Report No 49. Title: North of Celtic Deep rMCZ Post-survey Site Report Defra Project Code: MB0120 Defra Contract Manager: Carole Kelly Funded by: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) Marine Science and Evidence Unit Marine Directorate Nobel House 17 Smith Square London SW1P 3JR Authorship Louise Brown Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas) [email protected] Paul McIlwaine Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas) [email protected] Acknowledgements We thank Julia Rance and Stefan Bolam (Cefas) for creating earlier drafts of this report and Christopher Barrio Froján (Cefas) for reviewing the report. Disclaimer: The content of this report does not necessarily reflect the views of Defra, nor is Defra liable for the accuracy of information provided, or responsible for any use of the reports content. Although the data provided in this report have been quality assured, the final products - e.g. habitat maps – may be subject to revision following any further data provision or once they have been used in SNCB advice or assessments. Cefas Document Control Title: North of Celtic Deep rMCZ Post-survey Site Report Submitted to: Marine Protected Areas Survey Co-ordination & Evidence Delivery Group Date submitted: September 2017 Project Manager: Sue Ware Report compiled by: Louise Brown and Paul McIlwaine Quality control by: Chris Barrio and Peter Mitchell Approved by & date: Silke Kröger, 28.09.2017 Version: V3 Version Control History Author Date Comment Version L Brown & 13/11/2015 First draft submitted to MPAG for review 1 P McIlwaine L Brown & 03/02/2016 Revised following 1st round external review 2 P McIlwaine P McIlwaine 28/09/2017 Revised following 2nd round of review; PSG 3 comments.
    [Show full text]