DOCSLIB.ORG

Operation Plan for Colorado River Reservoirs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Operation Plan for Colorado River Reservoirs To: All Annual Operating Plan Recipients From: Michael Bernardo, P.E. From: Paul Davidson River Operations Manager Chief, Water Management Group Boulder Canyon Operations Office Water and Power Division, Power Office Interior Region 8: Lower Colorado Basin Interior Region 7: Upper Colorado Basin P.O. Box 61470 125 South State Street, Room 8100 Boulder City, NV 89006-1470 Salt Lake City, UT 84138-5571 Phone: 702-293-8111 Phone: 801-524-3709 The operation of Lake Powell and Lake Mead in this July 2021 24-Month Study is pursuant to the December 2007 Record of Decision on Colorado River Interim Guidelines for Lower Basin Shortages and the Coordinated Operations of Lake Powell and Lake Mead (Interim Guidelines), and reflects the 2021 Annual Operating Plan (AOP). Pursuant to the Interim Guidelines, the August 2020 24-Month Study projections of the January 1, 2021, system storage and reservoir water surface elevations set the operational tier for the coordinated operation of Lake Powell and Lake Mead during 2021. The August 2020 24-Month Study projected the January 1, 2021, Lake Powell elevation to be below the 2021 Equalization Elevation of 3,659 feet and above elevation 3,575 feet. Consistent with Section 6.B of the Interim Guidelines, Lake Powell is operating under the Upper Elevation Balancing Tier for water year 2021. With an 8.23 million acre-foot (maf) release from Lake Powell in water year 2021, the April 2021 24-Month Study projected the end of water year elevation at Lake Powell to be below 3,575 feet. Therefore, in accordance with Section 6.B.1 of the Interim Guidelines, Lake Powell will continue to release 8.23 maf through the remainder of the water year 2021. Consistent with Section 2.B.5 of the Interim Guidelines, the Intentionally Created Surplus (ICS) Surplus Condition is the criterion governing the operation of Lake Mead for calendar year 2021. In addition, Section III.B of Exhibit 1 to the Lower Basin Drought Contingency Plan (DCP) Agreement is also governing the operation of Lake Mead in calendar year 2021. Consistent with the Upper Basin DROA provisions to protect a target elevation at Lake Powell, this July 2021 24-Month Study includes releases from the upstream initial units of the Colorado River Storage Project Act to deliver an additional 181 thousand acre-feet (kaf) to Lake Powell by the end of December 2021. The additional releases will be implemented on the following schedule: Upper Basin Drought Response Operations Releases Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total (kaf) (kaf) (kaf) (kaf) (kaf) (kaf) (kaf) Flaming Gorge Reservoir 13 42 43 27 0 0 125 Blue Mesa Reservoir 0 14 18 4 0 0 36 Navajo Reservoir 0 0 0 0 10 10 20 Total (kaf) 13 56 61 31 10 10 181 The releases detailed above are in addition to the already established releases determined by operational plans for each of the identified facilities. The additional delivery of 181 kaf is expected to raise Lake Powell’s elevation by approximately three feet. Releases from Lake Powell to Lake Mead will not be adjusted in water year 2021 as those releases are determined by annual release volumes consistent with the Interim Guidelines. Current runoff projections into Lake Powell are provided by the National Weather Service’s Colorado Basin River Forecast Center and are as follows. The observed unregulated inflow into Lake Powell for the month of June was 0.810 maf or 30 percent of the 30-year average from 1981 to 2010. The July unregulated inflow forecast for Lake Powell is 0.104 maf or 10 percent of the 30-year average. The 2021 April through July unregulated inflow forecast is 1.745 maf or 24 percent of average. In this study, the calendar year 2021 diversion for Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) is projected to be 1.085 maf. The calendar year 2021 diversion for the Central Arizona Project (CAP) is projected to be 1.345 maf. Consumptive use for Nevada above Hoover (SNWP Use) is projected to be 0.250 maf for calendar year 2021. Due to changing Lake Mead elevations, Hoover’s generator capacity is adjusted based on estimated effective capacity and plant availability. The estimated effective capacity is based on projected Lake Mead elevations. Unit capacity tests will be performed as the lake elevation changes. This study reflects these changes in the projections. Hoover, Davis, and Parker Dam historical gross energy figures come from PO&M reports provided by the Lower Colorado Region’s Power Office, Bureau of Reclamation, Boulder City, Nevada. Questions regarding these historical energy numbers can be directed to Colleen Dwyer at (702) 293-8420. Runoff and inflow projections into upper basin reservoirs are provided by the Colorado River Forecasting Service through the National Weather Service’s Colorado Basin River Forecast Center and are as follows: Observed Inflow Jun Inflow Forecast Seasonal Outlook Reservoir Mar Apr May Jun %Avg Jul Aug Aug Apr-Jul %Avg Lake Powell 297 289 543 810 30% 104 90 175 1746 24% Fontenelle 40 54 76 143 48% 34 25 25 307 42% Flaming Gorge 68 72 96 147 38% 35 25 25 350 36% Blue Mesa 29 47 91 127 49% 41 32 26 305 45% Morrow Point 30 49 93 132 47% 46 33 28 320 43% Crystal 32 54 103 140 44% 48 37 32 345 41% Taylor Park 3.8 6.8 16.1 24 58% 9.1 6 4 56 57% Vallecito 4.1 13.6 50 44 63% 12.4 11 12 120 62% Navajo 24 81 169 103 46% 10 17 25 364 50% Lemon 0.6 2.5 13.6 8.6 41% 2.3 2 2.3 27 49% McPhee 4.1 12 40 21 28% 7 9 8 80 27% Ridgway 3.7 5.2 13.8 26 66% 10 7 6 55 54% Deerlodge 36 56 192 95 23% 13 6 5 358 29% Durango 6.7 17.9 72 89 59% 24 17 17 203 49% The 2021 AOP is available for download at: https://www.usbr.gov/lc/region/g4000/aop/AOP21.pdf. The Interim Guidelines are available for download at: https://www.usbr.gov/lc/region/programs/strategies/RecordofDecision.pdf. The Colorado River DCPs are available for download at: https://www.usbr.gov/dcp/finaldocs.html. The Upper Basin Hydrology Summary can be found at: https://www.usbr.gov/uc/water/crsp/studies/24Month_07_ucb.pdf OPERATION PLAN FOR COLORADO RIVER SYSTEM RESERVOIRS July 2021 24-Month Study Most Probable Inflow* Fontenelle Reservoir Regulated Evap Power Bypass Total Reservoir Elev Live Inflow Losses Release Release Release End of Month Storage Date (1000 Ac-Ft) (1000 Ac-Ft) (1000 Ac-Ft) (1000 Ac-Ft) (1000 Ac-Ft) (Ft) (1000 Ac-Ft) * Jul 2020 145 3 99 23 121 6504.12 330 H Aug 2020 41 2 74 0 74 6499.62 295 I Sep 2020 25 2 26 35 61 6494.55 258 WY 2020 996 15 856 137 993 S Oct 2020 32 1 0 55 55 6490.95 225 T Nov 2020 33 1 17 35 52 6487.89 205 O Dec 2020 27 1 50 1 51 6483.85 180 R Jan 2021 25 1 48 2 51 6479.03 153 I Feb 2021 24 0 46 0 46 6474.49 132 C Mar 2021 40 0 51 0 51 6472.03 121 A Apr 2021 54 1 49 0 49 6473.03 125 L May 2021 76 1 49 0 49 6478.67 152 * Jun 2021 143 2 42 0 42 6494.76 251 Jul 2021 34 2 43 0 43 6493.12 248 Aug 2021 25 2 43 0 43 6490.19 228 Sep 2021 25 2 37 0 37 6488.17 215 WY 2021 538 14 474 94 568 Oct 2021 30 1 24 13 37 6486.94 207 Nov 2021 31 1 44 0 44 6484.79 194 Dec 2021 25 1 46 0 46 6481.07 172 Jan 2022 22 1 46 0 46 6476.35 147 Feb 2022 21 0 42 0 42 6471.83 126 Mar 2022 37 0 46 0 46 6469.61 117 Apr 2022 63 1 55 0 55 6471.24 124 May 2022 120 1 81 0 81 6479.13 162 Jun 2022 250 2 102 10 112 6499.87 297 Jul 2022 160 3 101 17 118 6504.94 336 Aug 2022 58 2 75 0 75 6502.47 317 Sep 2022 43 2 37 33 70 6498.68 288 WY 2022 860 14 699 73 772 Oct 2022 44 1 72 0 72 6494.63 259 Nov 2022 43 1 65 0 65 6491.27 236 Dec 2022 33 1 68 0 68 6485.84 200 Jan 2023 31 1 68 0 68 6479.43 163 Feb 2023 29 0 61 0 61 6472.67 130 Mar 2023 53 0 68 0 68 6469.21 115 Apr 2023 82 1 75 0 75 6470.78 122 May 2023 169 1 92 0 92 6485.34 197 Jun 2023 278 2 103 72 176 6499.87 297 * Based on the Colorado River Basin Forecast Center's Most Probable Water Supply Forecast Model Run ID: 3154 Processed On: 7/15/2021 9:56:26AM OPERATION PLAN FOR COLORADO RIVER SYSTEM RESERVOIRS July 2021 24-Month Study Most Probable Inflow* Flaming Gorge Reservoir Unreg Reg Evap Power Bypass Total Bank Reservoir Elev Live Jensen Inflow Inflow Losses Release Release Release Storage End of Month Storage Flow Date (1000 Ac-Ft) (1000 Ac-Ft) (1000 Ac-Ft) (1000 Ac-Ft) (1000 Ac-Ft) (1000 Ac-Ft) (1000 Ac-Ft) (Ft) (1000 Ac-Ft) (1000 Ac-Ft) * Jul 2020 163 134 13 90 0 90 133 6028.55 3293 131 H Aug 2020 38 67 12 112 0 112 130 6027.10 3238 124 I Sep 2020 28 64 11 98 0 98 129 6025.93 3195 112 WY 2020 1255 1251 80 1333 62 1395 2825 S Oct 2020 25 50 7 64 0 64 128 6025.38 3174 85 T Nov 2020 37 55 4 54 0 54 128 6025.33 3172 82 O Dec 2020 24 48 2 62 0 62 127 6024.91 3157 88 R Jan 2021 31 57 2 62 0 62 127 6024.75 3151 88 I Feb 2021 31 52 2 56 0 56 127 6024.59 3145 79 C Mar 2021 68 79 3 52 0 52 127 6025.21 3168 96 A Apr 2021 72 67 5 51 0 51 128 6025.49 3178 112 L May 2021 96 72 8 95 0 95 127 6024.69 3149 296 * Jun 2021 149 46 10 80 0 80 125 6023.54 3107 205 Jul 2021 35 44 13 65 0 65 124 6022.63 3074 78 Aug 2021 25 43 12 95 0 95 121 6020.91 3012 101 Sep 2021 25 37 10 93 0 93 119 6019.11 2948 98 WY 2021 617 651 77 829 0 830 1409 Oct 2021 36 43 7 76 0 76 117 6018.02 2910 93 Nov 2021 40 53 3 51 0 51 117 6017.99 2909 75 Dec 2021 25 46 2 49 0 49 117 6017.86 2905 68 Jan 2022 27 51 2 49 0 49 117 6017.87 2905 66 Feb 2022 31 52 2 44 0 44 117 6018.02 2910 60 Mar 2022 77 86 3 49 0 49 119 6018.96 2943 109 Apr 2022 110 102 5 48 0 48 120 6020.33 2991 213 May 2022 165 126 7 49 0 49 123 6022.20 3058 494 Jun 2022 290 152 10 122 0 122 124 6022.73 3077 572 Jul 2022 185 143 13 55 0 55 127 6024.70 3149 130 Aug 2022 68 85 12 90 0 90 126 6024.27 3133 109 Sep 2022 46 73 11 89 0 89 125 6023.57 3108 102 WY 2022 1100 1012 75 771 0 771 2091 Oct 2022 51 79 7 58 0
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The State of Outdoor Recreation in Utah 2020 a High-Level Review of the Data & Trends That Define Outdoor Recreation in the State
    the State of outdoor recreation in utah 2020 A high-level review of the data & trends that define outdoor recreation in the state. Jordan W. Smith, Ph.D. & Anna B. Miller, Ph.D. Institute of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, Utah State University about the Institute The Institute of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism (IORT) was founded in 1998 by the Utah State Legisla- ture through the Recreation and Tourism Research and Extension Program Act (S.B. 35). It is mandated to focus on: tourism and outdoor recreation use; the social and economic tradeoffs of tourism and outdoor recreation for local communities; and the relationship between outdoor recreation and tourism and pub- lic land management practices and policies. The purpose of the Institute is to provide: better data for the Legislature and state agencies in their deci- sion-making processes on issues relating to tourism and outdoor recreation; a base of information and expertise to assist community officials as they attempt to balance the economic, social, and environmen- tal tradeoffs in tourism development; and an interdisciplinary approach of research and study on outdoor recreation and tourism, a complex sector of the state’s economy. The Institute is composed of an interdisciplinary team of scientists with backgrounds in the economic, psychological, social, and spatial sciences. It is led by Dr. Jordan W. Smith (Director), Dr. Anna B. Miller (Assistant Director of Research and Operations), and Chase C. Lamborn (Assistant Director of Outreach and Education). The Institute delivers on its mission through a broad network of Faculty Fellows. Jordan W. Smith, Ph.D.1, is the Director of the Institute of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism and an As- sistant Professor in the Department of Environment and Society at Utah State University.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Canyon Helicopter Tours
    GRAND CANYON HELICOPTER TOURS * * $289 Adult • $269 Child (Ages 2 - 11) + $35 Fees $364 Adult • $344 Child (Ages 2 - 11) + $80 Fees GRAND CANYON SOAR LIKE AN EAGLE THROUGH THE GRAND CANYON • Descend 4,000 feet into the Grand Canyon MOST AND SEE THE BEAUTIFUL BOWL OF FIRE. • Touch down by the banks of the Colorado River POPULAR • Champagne picnic under an authentic Hualapai Indian shelter TOUR! & Las Vegas Tours • Air only excursion through the Grand Canyon • Views of Lake Mead, Hoover Dam, Fortication Hill and the Grand Wash Clis • Views of Lake Mead, Hoover Dam, Fortification Hill and the Grand Wash Clis • Tour Duration: Approximately 4 hours (hotel to hotel) World’s Largest Grand Canyon Air Tour Company, since 1965! • Tour Duration: Approximately 3 hours (hotel to hotel) • $40 SUNSET UPGRADE (PBW-4S) • ADD LIMO TRANSFERS & STRIP FLIGHT (PLW-1) $404 Adult • $384 Child (ages 2-11) + $80 Fees $349 Adult • $329 Child (Ages 2-11) + $40 Fees • ADD LIMO TRANSFERS & STRIP FLIGHT (PLW-4) $414 Adult • $394 Child (ages 2-11) + $80 Fees • ADD LIMO TRANSFERS, SUNSET & STRIP FLIGHT (PLW-4S) $454 Adult • $434 Child (ages 2-11) + $80 Fees $94 Adult • $74 Child (Ages 2 - 11) + $10 Fees TAKE TO THE SKIES OVER THE DAZZLING AND WORLD FAMOUS LAS VEGAS "STRIP"! • Views of the MGM, New York New York, Caesar’s Palace, Bellagio, Mirage and more • Fly by the Stratosphere Tower and downtown Glitter Gulch where Las Vegas began • Complimentary champagne toast L’excursion aérienne Die vielseitigste Papillon- Veleggiate al di sotto del キャニオン上空を低 La visita aérea más • Tour Duration: Approx.
    [Show full text]
  • Printable Celestial Navigation Work Forms
    S T A R P A T H ® S c h o o l o f N a v i g a t i o n PRINTABLE CELESTIAL NAVIGATION WORK FORMS For detailed instructions and numerical examples, see the companion booklet listed below. FORM 104 — All bodies, using Pub 249 or Pub 229 FORM 106 — All Bodies, Using NAO Tables FORM 108 — All Bodies, Almanac, and NAO Tables FORM 109 — Solar Index Correction FORM 107 — Latitude at LAN FORM 110 — Latitude by Polaris FORM 117 — Lat, Lon at LAN plus Polaris FORM 111 — Pub 249, Vol. 1 Selected Stars Other Starpath publications on Celestial Navigation Celestial Navigation Starpath Celestial Navigation Work Forms Hawaii by Sextant How to Use Plastic Sextants The Star Finder Book GPS Backup with a Mark 3 Sextant Emergency Navigation Stark Tables for Clearing the Lunar Distance Long Term Almanac 2000 to 2050 Celestial Navigation Work Form Form 104, All Sights, Pub. 249 or Pub. 229 WT h m s date body Hs ° ´ WE DR log index corr. 1 +S -F Lat + off - on ZD DR HE DIP +W -E Lon ft - UTC h m s UTC date / LOP label Ha ° ´ GHA v Dec d HP ° ´ moon ° ´ + 2 hr. planets hr - moon GHA + d additional ° ´ + ´ altitude corr. m.s. corr. - moon, mars, venus 3 SHA + stars Dec Dec altitude corr. or ° ´ or ° ´ all sights v corr. moon, planets min GHA upper limb moon ° ´ tens d subtract 30’ d upper Ho units d ° ´ a-Lon ° ´ d lower -W+E dsd dsd T LHA corr. + Hc 00´ W / 60´ E ° d.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mathematics of the Chinese, Indian, Islamic and Gregorian Calendars
    Heavenly Mathematics: The Mathematics of the Chinese, Indian, Islamic and Gregorian Calendars Helmer Aslaksen Department of Mathematics National University of Singapore [email protected] www.math.nus.edu.sg/aslaksen/ www.chinesecalendar.net 1 Public Holidays There are 11 public holidays in Singapore. Three of them are secular. 1. New Year’s Day 2. Labour Day 3. National Day The remaining eight cultural, racial or reli- gious holidays consist of two Chinese, two Muslim, two Indian and two Christian. 2 Cultural, Racial or Religious Holidays 1. Chinese New Year and day after 2. Good Friday 3. Vesak Day 4. Deepavali 5. Christmas Day 6. Hari Raya Puasa 7. Hari Raya Haji Listed in order, except for the Muslim hol- idays, which can occur anytime during the year. Christmas Day falls on a fixed date, but all the others move. 3 A Quick Course in Astronomy The Earth revolves counterclockwise around the Sun in an elliptical orbit. The Earth ro- tates counterclockwise around an axis that is tilted 23.5 degrees. March equinox June December solstice solstice September equinox E E N S N S W W June equi Dec June equi Dec sol sol sol sol Beijing Singapore In the northern hemisphere, the day will be longest at the June solstice and shortest at the December solstice. At the two equinoxes day and night will be equally long. The equi- noxes and solstices are called the seasonal markers. 4 The Year The tropical year (or solar year) is the time from one March equinox to the next. The mean value is 365.2422 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Calculating Percentages for Time Spent During Day, Week, Month
    Calculating Percentages of Time Spent on Job Responsibilities Instructions for calculating time spent during day, week, month and year This is designed to help you calculate percentages of time that you perform various duties/tasks. The figures in the following tables are based on a standard 40 hour work week, 174 hour work month, and 2088 hour work year. If a recurring duty is performed weekly and takes the same amount of time each week, the percentage of the job that this duty represents may be calculated by dividing the number of hours spent on the duty by 40. For example, a two-hour daily duty represents the following percentage of the job: 2 hours x 5 days/week = 10 total weekly hours 10 hours / 40 hours in the week = .25 = 25% of the job. If a duty is not performed every week, it might be more accurate to estimate the percentage by considering the amount of time spent on the duty each month. For example, a monthly report that takes 4 hours to complete represents the following percentage of the job: 4/174 = .023 = 2.3%. Some duties are performed only certain times of the year. For example, budget planning for the coming fiscal year may take a week and a half (60 hours) and is a major task, but this work is performed one time a year. To calculate the percentage for this type of duty, estimate the total number of hours spent during the year and divide by 2088. This budget planning represents the following percentage of the job: 60/2088 = .0287 = 2.87%.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary U.S
    Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan Environmental Impact Statement PUBLIC DRAFT Executive Summary U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation, Upper Colorado Region National Park Service, Intermountain Region December 2015 Cover photo credits: Title bar: Grand Canyon National Park Grand Canyon: Grand Canyon National Park Glen Canyon Dam: T.R. Reeve High-flow experimental release: T.R. Reeve Fisherman: T. Gunn Humpback chub: Arizona Game and Fish Department Rafters: Grand Canyon National Park Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan December 2015 Draft Environmental Impact Statement 1 CONTENTS 2 3 4 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................. vii 5 6 ES.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 7 ES.2 Proposed Federal Action ........................................................................................ 2 8 ES.2.1 Purpose of and Need for Action .............................................................. 2 9 ES.2.2 Objectives and Resource Goals of the LTEMP ....................................... 3 10 ES.3 Scope of the DEIS .................................................................................................. 6 11 ES.3.1 Affected Region and Resources .............................................................. 6 12 ES.3.2 Impact Topics Selected for Detailed Analysis ........................................ 6 13 ES.4
    [Show full text]
  • Calworks 48-Month Time Limit
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES CALWORKS 48-MONTH TIME LIMIT CalWORKs 48-MONTH TIME LIMIT ON AID Beginning July 1, 2011, an aided adult (parent, stepparent, and/or caretaker relative) can only get 48 months (4 years) of cash aid from the California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) program. This includes cash aid you got from California and other states’ Federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Programs. The 48-month time limit does NOT apply to: • Children • Child Care • Medi-Cal Benefits • CalFresh Benefits • Aid that you got from California or other states under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) Program before January 1, 1998. FACTS YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT THE CalWORKs 48-MONTH TIME LIMIT Time Limit Exemptions - “Clock Stoppers” A month on cash aid does not count toward your CalWORKs 48-month time limit if at any time during that month you are: • Disabled (You must have medical proof of a disability that is expected to last at least 30 days.) • 60 years or older. • Caring for an ill or incapacitated person living in your home, which impairs you from working or participating in welfare-to-work activities. • Caring for a dependent child of the court or a child at risk of placement in foster care, which impairs you from working or participating in welfare-to-work activities. • A victim of domestic abuse and the county waives the 48-month time limit. • Living in Indian Country, as defined by federal law, or an Alaskan native village, in which at least 50 percent of the adults are unemployed.
    [Show full text]
  • Flaming Gorge Operation Plan - May 2021 Through April 2022
    Flaming Gorge Operation Plan - May 2021 through April 2022 Concurrence by Kathleen Callister, Resources Management Division Manager Kent Kofford, Provo Area Office Manager Nicholas Williams, Upper Colorado Basin Power Manager Approved by Wayne Pullan, Upper Colorado Basin Regional Director U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation • Interior Region 7 Upper Colorado Basin • Power Office Salt Lake City, Utah May 2021 Purpose This Flaming Gorge Operation Plan (FG-Ops) fulfills the 2006 Flaming Gorge Record of Decision (ROD) requirement for May 2021 through April 2022. The FG-Ops also completes the 4-step process outlined in the Flaming Gorge Standard Operation Procedures. The Upper Colorado Basin Power Office (UCPO) operators will fulfil the operation plan and may alter from FG-Ops due to day to day conditions, although we will attempt to stay within the boundaries of the operations defined below. Listed below are proposed operation plans for four different scenarios: moderately dry, average (above median), average (below median), and moderately wet. As of the publishing of this document, the most likely scenario is the moderately dry, however actual operations will vary with hydrologic conditions. The Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program (Recovery Program), the Flaming Gorge Technical Working Group (FGTWG), Flaming Gorge Working Group (FG WG), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and Western Area Power Administration (WAPA) provided input that was considered in the development of this report. The FG-Ops describes the current hydrologic classification of the Green River Basin and the hydrologic conditions in the Yampa River Basin. The FG-Ops identifies the most likely Reach 2 peak flow magnitude and duration that is to be targeted for the upcoming spring flows.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Mead and Lake Powell
    Colorado River Water Supply Report Agenda Number 12. Total System Contents: 27.507 MAF 68% 8/26/13 Reservoir Capacities (MAF) Reservoir Current Change Maximum 76% Lake Mead 12.25 + 0.02 25.90 Lake Powell 10.84 - 0.55 24.30 Flaming Gorge Reservoir 2.84 - 0.05 3.75 Navajo Reservoir 0.86 - 0.05 1.70 Blue Mesa Reservoir 0.37 - 0.03 0.83 Fontenelle Reservoir 0.23 - 0.01 0.34 Morrow Point Reservoir 0.11 0.00 0.12 44% Lake Powell 3,700’ 97% 45%, 10.839 MAF 3,590’ 51% Lake Mead 1,220’ 47%, 12.248 MAF 1,106’ 1,075’ 3,680 1,130 Lake Powell Elevations (2013 August 24-Month Study) Lake Mead Elevations (2013 August 24-Month Study) 3,660 1,120 3,640 1,110 3,620 1,100 3,600 1,090 3,580 1,080 Historical 3,560 1,070 Historical Maximum Probable Forecast Maximum Probable Forecast Most Probable Forecast Most Probable Forecast 3,540 1,060 Minimum Probable Forecast Minimum Probable Forecast Shortage 3,520 1,050 The August 2013 24-Month study projected that with an annual release of 8.23 MAF (as was consistent in water year Based on a 2013), the January 1st elevation of Lake Powell would be potential shortage 3,574 ft, which is less than 3,575 ft and places Lake Powell in 2016, impacts to in the mid-elevation release tier. Since Lake Mead is not CAP projected below 1,025 ft, according to the 2007 Interim Guidelines, demand in 2016 under this operational tier annual releases from Lake would include a 320 Powell to Lake Mead will be reduced to 7.48 MAF (for water KAF reduction to year 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Fill Mead First: a Technical Assessment1 Executive Summary
    Fill Mead First: a technical assessment1 John C. Schmidt2 with contributions from Maggi Kraft3, Daphnee Tuzlak4, and Alex Walker3 White Paper No. 1 Center for Colorado River Studies Quinney College of Natural Resources Utah State University November 10, 2016 Executive Summary The Fill Mead First (FMF) plan would establish Lake Mead reservoir as the primary water storage facility of the main-stem Colorado River and would relegate Lake Powell reservoir to a secondary water storage facility to be used only when Lake Mead is full. The objectives of the FMF plan are to re-expose some of Glen Canyon’s sandstone walls that are now inundated, begin the process of re-creating a riverine ecosystem in Glen Canyon, restore a more natural stream-flow, temperature, and sediment-supply regime of the Colorado River in the Grand Canyon ecosystem, and reduce system-wide water losses caused by evaporation and movement of reservoir water into ground-water storage. The FMF plan would be implemented in three phases. Phase I would involve lowering Lake Powell to the minimum elevation at which hydroelectricity can still be produced (called minimum power pool elevation): 3490 ft asl (feet above sea level). At this elevation, the water surface area of Lake 1 suggested citation: Schmidt, J. C., Kraft, M., Tuzlak, D., and Walker, A. 2016. Fill Mead First: a technical assessment. Logan, Utah State University Quinney College of Natural Resources, Center for Colorado River Studies, white paper no. 1, 80 p., available at <https://qcnr.usu.edu/wats/colorado_river_studies/>. 2 corresponding author; Department of Watershed Sciences, Utah State University, Logan UT 84322-5210; [email protected] 3 graduate student, Department of Watershed Sciences 4 graduate student, Department of Geology 1 Powell is approximately 77 mi2, which is 31% of the surface area when the reservoir is full.
    [Show full text]
  • The Indian Luni-Solar Calendar and the Concept of Adhik-Maas
    Volume -3, Issue-3, July 2013 The Indian Luni-Solar Calendar and the giving rise to alternative periods of light and darkness. All human and animal life has evolved accordingly, Concept of Adhik-Maas (Extra-Month) keeping awake during the day-light but sleeping through the dark nights. Even plants follow a daily rhythm. Of Introduction: course some crafty beings have turned nocturnal to take The Hindu calendar is basically a lunar calendar and is advantage of the darkness, e.g., the beasts of prey, blood– based on the cycles of the Moon. In a purely lunar sucker mosquitoes, thieves and burglars, and of course calendar - like the Islamic calendar - months move astronomers. forward by about 11 days every solar year. But the Hindu calendar, which is actually luni-solar, tries to fit together The next natural clock in terms of importance is the the cycle of lunar months and the solar year in a single revolution of the Earth around the Sun. Early humans framework, by adding adhik-maas every 2-3 years. The noticed that over a certain period of time, the seasons concept of Adhik-Maas is unique to the traditional Hindu changed, following a fixed pattern. Near the tropics - for lunar calendars. For example, in 2012 calendar, there instance, over most of India - the hot summer gives way were 13 months with an Adhik-Maas falling between to rain, which in turn is followed by a cool winter. th th August 18 and September 16 . Further away from the equator, there were four distinct seasons - spring, summer, autumn, winter.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Mead National Recreation Area Draft Quagga Mussel Initial Response Plan
    Lake Mead National Recreation Area Draft Quagga Mussel Initial Response Plan Executive Summary Quagga mussels, closely related to zebra mussels, were first discovered at Lake Mead National Recreation Area (Lake Mead NRA) on January 6, 2007, the first detection of this species in the western United States. These invasive freshwater mussels are expected to cause major impacts to biological resources, submerged cultural resources, marinas, water intakes, boats and recreational use in the Lower Colorado River System and, if spread, pose similar threats to other western waters. The National Park Service led a three month interagency initial response effort focused on assessment, containment, treatment, and long-term management of the quagga mussel infestation in Lakes Mead and Mohave. This effort culminated in an Initial Response Plan. When no treatment or eradication methods were found to be feasible at this time, the efforts focused on containment of spread to other watersheds. The highlights of the initial response effort include: • Interagency planning at the local level with close coordination with concurrent upstream and downstream planning efforts as well as significant input from the scientific community • Increased emphasis on the pre-existing invasive aquatic species prevention and early detection program • Assessment and monitoring of adult and juvenile quagga mussel populations in Lakes Mead and Mohave • Containment strategy focused on mandatory cleaning upon entry and exit for all slipped and moored boats • New special use permit
    [Show full text]