Towards Improved Treatment Outcomes for Tuberculosis Meningitis - Rethinking the Regimen
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Mini Review Article Open Access J Neurol Neurosurg Volume 8 Issue 2- August 2018 DOI: 10.19080/OAJNN.2018.08.555734 Copyright © All rights are reserved by Rajeswari Ramachandran Towards Improved Treatment Outcomes for Tuberculosis Meningitis - Rethinking the Regimen Rajeswari Ramachandran1* and Muniyandi M2 1Consultant Neurologist, Dr Kamakshi Memorial Hospital, India 2Scientist-C, National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Indian Council of Medical Research, India Submission: December 16, 2017; Published: August 16, 2018 *Corresponding author: Rajeswari Ramachandran, Consultant Neurologist, Dr. Kamakshi Memorial Hospital, Tamil Nadu, India; Tel: ; Email: Abstract Tuberculosis (TB) ranks as the second leading cause of death from an infectious disease worldwide. TB meningitis (TBM) is the most destructive extra-pulmonary form of TB. The current recommended treatment prevents death or disability in less than half of the patients. TB meningitis still represents an important problem by contributing to a huge number of years of life lost. The management of TBM remains a big challenge. In this context, this manuscript discusses anti TB drugs and treatment regimens that make a difference in the treatment outcomes of TBM considering the pharmacokinetics parameters of anti TB drugs with special reference to the Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB) which is unique to Central Nervous System (CNS). It was observed that generally the treatment outcomes are poor with the recommended regimens (mortality rate ranging from 6.3 to 48.1%). In view of the poor treatment outcomes with standard regimens, different studies were carried out to strengthen in reducing mortality. There is an urgent need to rethink TBM treatment regimens and to strengthen it considering the following factors: PK parametersthe regimen of and the improve anti TB thedrugs treatment including outcomes their ability by using to penetrate different the interventions. BBB and drugs Most that of achieve the studies good did CSF not concentrations, show a significant drugs improvement that achieve CSF concentrations above the MIC value, considering new drugs, retooling old drugs, using second line drugs for TBM as first line drugs, and optimummodifying duration the host of response. treatment. In the management of TBM we need clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of regimens containing drugs like isoniazid, pyrazinamide, levofloxacin, linezolid, ethionamide, rifampicin and injectable aminoglycoside and trials are also needed to assess the Keywords: Virus; CSF: CerebroSpinal Fluid TB: Tuberculosis; TBM: TB Meningitis; CNS: Central Nervous System; BBB: Blood-Brain Barrier; HIV: Human Immunodeficiency Introduction worldwide with up to half of surviving patients presenting with Infectious diseases still pose a major problem for public irreversible sequelae, including paraplegia, blindness, motor and health, mainly in developing countries, where they are the most common reasons contributing to both mortality morbidity and the family. The current recommended treatment prevents death disability. This results in enormous economic burden to the cognitive deficits [4], resulting in enormous economic burden to or disability in less than half of the patients. TB meningitis still patient, family and the country. Tuberculosis (TB) remains a represents an important problem by contributing to a huge major global health problem, responsible for ill health among millions of people each year. TB ranks as the second leading cause of death from an infectious disease worldwide, after the numberIn this of yearsmanuscript of life lostwe discuss[5]. anti TB drugs and treatment regimens that make a difference in the treatment outcomes of HumanTuberculosis Immunodeficiency meningitis Virus (TBM) (HIV) is the [1]. most destructive extra- of anti TB drugs with special reference to the Blood-Brain TBM. Specifically, we consider the pharmacokinetics parameters Barrier (BBB) which is unique to Central Nervous System (CNS). the membranes that envelop the brain and the spinal cord. The pulmonary form of TB. It is an inflammation of the meninges, We have looked at chemotherapy in terms of choice of drugs, reports from India indicate that one tenth of EPTB cases were optimum dosage, ability to penetrate the BBB and the possible inclusion of immune modulators such as steroids and the role of meningial, spinal and bone TB [2]. Reported long term case shunt surgery. fatality due to TBM ranges from 20 to 69% [3], in different settings Open Access J Neurol Neurosurg 8(2): OAJNN.MS.ID.555734 (2018) 001 Open Access Journal of Neurology & Neurosurgery Current Treatment for TBM done during 1969 to 2010. It was observed that generally the treatment outcomes are poor with the recommended regimens The treatment of EPTB follows standard treatment -mortality rate ranging from 6.3 to 48.1%. The pooled estimate of guidelines depending on the categorization and is consistent with international recommendations by WHO and the of childhood-TBM reported treatment regimens used and their International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease mortality was 19.1% [8]. A systematic review and meta-analysis outcomes. The pooled estimates based on 19 studies, with reported treatment outcomes on 1636 children in ten countries and treated with two months isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide (IUATLD) [6,7]. TBM patients are considered to be seriously ill between 1952 and 2005 showed a risk of death in 19.3% and and streptomycin followed by 7 months of continuation phase probability of survival without neurological sequelae was only treated with isoniazid and rifampicin. The recommended anti TB drugs and the duration of treatment for TBM is described for antimicrobial combinations were studied. These studies did TBM in Box-1. 36.7% [9]. In these studies 27 regimens were used and multiple not show any associations between outcomes and study-level Poor Treatment Outcomes treatment characteristics such as treatment duration, number Figure 1 & Figure 2 describes the treatment outcomes of intensive-phase drugs, isoniazid dose, rifampicin dose, and such as mortality and morbidity reported by different studies use of rifampicin, streptomycin, pyrazinamide, ethambutol, or corticosteroids. Figure 1: Treatment outcomes of childhood tuberculous meningitis (mortality) Figure 2: Treatment outcomes of childhood tuberculous meningitis (morbidity) How to cite this article: Rajeswari R, Muniyandi M. Towards Improved Treatment Outcomes for Tuberculosis Meningitis - Rethinking the Regimen. 002 Open Access J Neurol Neurosurg. 2018; 8(2): 555734. DOI: 10.19080/OAJNN.2018.08.555734. Open Access Journal of Neurology & Neurosurgery In view of the poor treatment outcomes with standard adding steroids, management of hydrocephalus, etc. Majority of regimens (Table 1), different studies were carried out to strengthen the regimen and improve the treatment outcomes mortality. It is disappointing that there was no advantage the studies did not show a significant improvement in reducing by using different interventions such as high dose rifampicin, adding newer quinolones, adding ethionomide, adding linezolid, with regard to overall mortality and most measures of illness. associated with the use of these intensified treatment regimens, addingTable1: bothEfforts rifampicin taken to improve and levofloxacin, the treatment high outcome dose moxifloxacin, in TBM - Interventions and treatment outcomes. Interventions Outcomes Higher rifampin (13mg per kg) administered intravenously Linezolid supplementationMorality 34% [19]has a remarkable Addition of linezolid therapeutic benefit for TBM, as shown by rapid consciousness recovery, in the first 4 Intensified regimen Higher doseweeks of oral of rifampin treatment than [15] the standard dose (15mg per kilogram of body weight vs. 10 mg per kilogram) and the addition Addition of rifampicin, levofloxacin [20] mortality (28%) of levofloxacin to the standard regimen: Intrathecal administration levofloxacin amikacin Successful outcomeMorality (Case 63% report) [11] Moxifloxacin IsoniazidHigh dose (15 moxifloxacin to 20mg per 800mgkg) + rifampin [19] (20mg per kg) + pyrazinamide (40mg per 26% at stage III and 6% at stage II died before Ethionomide kg) + ethionamide (20mg per kg), all given completion of therapy. 6 months rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, throughout 6 months [13] 80% children had a good outcome Mortality Ethionomide ethambutolfor HIV-uninfected and the same 3.8% Corticosteroidsdrugs 9for months have no for effect HIV-infected on people [14] who survive TBM with disabling neurological Steroids reduce deaths by almost one quarter Role of corticosteroids death. However, this small possible harm is deficit,unlikely but to thisbe quantitatively outcome is less important common when than compared to the reduction in mortality. (RR 0.75) [18] Surgery is required for patients with Management of hydrocephalus including obstructive hydrocephalus and those in poor 10.5% to 57.1% depending on various clinical diuretics & shunt surgery grades, requiring repeated revisions. Outcome variable[i]associated Mortality factors varied from months in both treatment cohorts, which Increasing duration of treatment suggestedMost deaths that the occurred difference during in death the first rate 6 was 6 months vs longer than 6 months [22] not directly related to duration of ATT Seven patients died during the treatment Directly observed treatment Intermittent short course chemotherapy There is a need to rethink on TBM treatment regimens resulting