LIST of ATTORNEYS DISCLAIMER: the U.S
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Bombay High Court
2007 Bombay High Court 2007 JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL S 7142128 S 4111825S 4111825S 1 8 15 22 29 M 1 8152229 M 51219 26 M 51219 26 M 2 9 16 23 30 T 2 9162330 T 6132027 T 6132027 T 3101724 W 3 10 17 24 31 W 7142128 W 7142128W 4111825 T 4 11 18 25 T 1 8 15 22 T 1 8 15 22 29 T 5121926 F 5 12 19 26 F 2916 23 F 2 9 16 23 30 F 6 13 20 27 S 61320 27 S 31017 24 S 3 10 17 24 31 S 7 14 21 28 1. Sundays, Second & Fourth Saturdays and other Holidays are shown in red. MAY 2. The Summer Vacation of the Court will commence on Monday the 7th May, JUNE S 6132027 2007 and the Court will resume its sitting on Monday the 4th June, 2007. S 3101724 3. The court will remain closed on account of October Vacation from 5th M 7142128 November to 18th November, 2007. M 4111825 T 1 8 15 22 29 4. Christmas Vacation from 24th December, 2007 to 6th January, 2008. T 5121926 5. Id-uz-Zuha, Muharram, Milad-un-Nabi, Id-ul-Fitr and Id-uz-Zuha W 2 9 16 23 30 respectively are subject to change depending upon the visibility of the W 6132027 T 3 10 17 24 31 Moon. If the Government of India declares any change in these dates through T 7142128 TV/AIR/Newspaper, the same will be followed. F 4 11 18 25 6. -
The High Court at Bombay (Extension of Jurisdiction to Goa, Daman and Diu) Act, 1981 Act No
THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY (EXTENSION OF JURISDICTION TO GOA, DAMAN AND DIU) ACT, 1981 ACT NO. 26 OF 1981 [9th September, 1981.] An Act to provide for the extension of the jurisdiction of the High Court at Bombay to the Union territory of Goa, Daman and Diu, for the establishment of a permanent bench of that High Court at Panaji and for matters connected therewith. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Thirty-second Year of the Republic of India as follows:— 1. Short title and commencement.—(1) This Act may be called the High Court at Bombay (Extension of Jurisdiction to Goa, Daman and Diu) Act, 1981. (2) It shall come into force on such date1 as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint. 2. Definitions.—In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,— (a) “appointed day” means the date on which this Act comes into force; (b) “Court of the Judicial Commissioner” means the Court of the Judicial Commissioner for Goa, Daman and Diu. 3. Extension of jurisdiction of Bombay High Court to Goa, Daman and Diu.—(1) On and from the appointed day, the jurisdiction of the High Court at Bombay shall extend to the Union territory of Goa, Daman and Diu. (2) On and from the appointed day, the Court of the Judicial Commissioner shall cease to function and is hereby abolished: Provided that nothing in this sub-section shall prejudice or affect the continued operation of any notice served, injunction issued, direction given or proceedings taken before the appointed day by the Court of the Judicial Commissioner, abolished by this sub-section, under the powers then conferred upon that Court. -
In the High Court of Judicature at Bombay
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION \9 NOTICE OF MOTION(NO.S2J"OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1286 OF 2018 Mumbai Cricket Association. ... Applicant (Original Respondent No.1) In the matter between NadimMemon ... Petitioner VERSUS Mumbai Cricket Association &Ors ... Respondents. INDEX Date Exh.No. Particulars Page No. Proforma Notice of Motion 1-8 Affidavit in support of Notice of . 9-15 Motion ". , 6/4/2018. A. Copy of order. 16-2~ 2/5/2018 B. News paper report in Times ofIndia 23 2/5/2018 C. Copy of Minutes of Committee of 24 Administrators of Respondent No.1 ~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1286 OF 2018 Mumbai Cricket Association, a public ) Trust registered under the provisions of ) Bombay public trust Act, 1950 as also a ) Society registered under the provision of the ) Societies Registration Act, 1860 having its ) Office at Cricket Center, Wankhede Stadium, ) Churchgate Mumbai- 400020. ) .. '" Applicant (Original Respondent No.1) In the matter between:- Nadim Memon, an adult Indian Inhabitant ) Occupation ;- Business having his address at ) 22, Rustom Sidwa Marg, Fort, Mumbai - 400 001 ) ... Petitioner Vis 1) Mumbai Cricket Association, a public ) Trust registered under the provisions of ) Bombay public trust Act, 1950 as also a ) Society registered under the provision of the ) Societies Registration Act, 1860 having its ) Office at Cricket Center, Wankhede Stadium, ) Churchgate Mumbai- 400020. ) v 2) Wizcraft International Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. ) A company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 ) Having its registered office at Satyadev Plaza, ) 5th Floor, Fun Republic Lane, Off. -
Reportable in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay
WWW.LIVELAW.IN Board of Control for Cricket in India vs Deccan Chronicle Holding Ltd CARBPL-4466-20-J.docx GP A/W AGK & SSM REPORTABLE IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION COMM ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO. 4466 OF 2020 Board of Control for Cricket in India, a society registered under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act 1975 and having its head office at Cricket Centre, Wankhede Stadium, Mumbai 400 020 … Petitioner ~ versus ~ Deccan Chronicle Holdings Ltd, a company incorporated under the Companies Act 1956 and having its registered office at 36, Sarojini Devi Road, Secunderabad, Andhra Pradesh … Respondent appearances Mr Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General, with FOR THE PETITIONER Samrat Sen, Kanu Agrawal, Indranil “BCCI” Deshmukh, Adarsh Saxena, Ms R Shah and Kartik Prasad, Advocates i/b Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas Page 1 of 176 16th June 2021 ::: Uploaded on - 16/06/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 16/06/2021 17:38:08 ::: WWW.LIVELAW.IN Board of Control for Cricket in India vs Deccan Chronicle Holding Ltd CARBPL-4466-20-J.docx Mr Haresh Jagtiani, Senior Advocate, with Mr Navroz Seervai, Senior Advocate, FOR THE RESPONDENT Mr Sharan Jagtiani, Senior Advocate, “DCHL” Yashpal Jain, Suprabh Jain, Ankit Pandey, Ms Rishika Harish & Ms Bhumika Chulani, Advocates i/b Yashpal Jain CORAM : GS Patel, J JUDGMENT RESERVED ON : 12th January 2021 JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED ON : 16th June 2021 JUDGMENT: OUTLINE OF CONTENTS This judgment is arranged in the following parts. A. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................ 4 B. THE CHALLENGE IN BRIEF; SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS................................................ 6 C. THE AMBIT OF SECTION 34 ................................................. -
FEZANA Journal Do Not Necessarily Reflect the Feroza Fitch of Views of FEZANA Or Members of This Publication's Editorial Board
FEZANA FEZANA JOURNAL ZEMESTAN 1379 AY 3748 ZRE VOL. 24, NO. 4 WINTER/DECEMBER 2010 G WINTER/DECEMBER 2010 JOURJO N AL Dae – Behman – Spendarmad 1379 AY (Fasli) G Amordad – Shehrever – Meher 1380 AY (Shenshai) G Shehrever – Meher – Avan 1380 AY (Kadimi) CELEBRATING 1000 YEARS Ferdowsi’s Shahnameh: The Soul of Iran HAPPY NEW YEAR 2011 Also Inside: Earliest surviving manuscripts Sorabji Pochkhanawala: India’s greatest banker Obama questioned by Zoroastrian students U.S. Presidential Executive Mission PUBLICATION OF THE FEDERATION OF ZOROASTRIAN ASSOCIATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA PUBLICATION OF THE FEDERATION OF ZOROASTRIAN ASSOCIATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA Vol 24 No 4 Winter / December 2010 Zemestan 1379 AY 3748 ZRE President Bomi V Patel www.fezana.org Editor in Chief: Dolly Dastoor 2 Editorial [email protected] Technical Assistant: Coomi Gazdar Dolly Dastoor Assistant to Editor: Dinyar Patel Consultant Editor: Lylah M. Alphonse, [email protected] 6 Financial Report Graphic & Layout: Shahrokh Khanizadeh, www.khanizadeh.info Cover design: Feroza Fitch, 8 FEZANA UPDATE-World Youth Congress [email protected] Publications Chair: Behram Pastakia Columnists: Hoshang Shroff: [email protected] Shazneen Rabadi Gandhi : [email protected] 12 SHAHNAMEH-the Soul of Iran Yezdi Godiwalla: [email protected] Behram Panthaki::[email protected] Behram Pastakia: [email protected] Mahrukh Motafram: [email protected] 50 IN THE NEWS Copy editors: R Mehta, V Canteenwalla Subscription Managers: Arnavaz Sethna: [email protected]; -
LAW MANTRA THINK BEYOND OTHERS (I.S.S.N 2321- 6417 (Online) Ph: +918255090897 Website: Journal.Lawmantra.Co.In E-Mail: [email protected] [email protected]
LAW MANTRA THINK BEYOND OTHERS (I.S.S.N 2321- 6417 (Online) Ph: +918255090897 Website: journal.lawmantra.co.in E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] INGRESSION OF WOMEN IN PLACES OF WORSHIP AN EQUALITY DIMENSION Abstract:- The bans such as women’s entry into temples involve notions and norms which directly clash with ideas of modernity and are also incompatible with rights enshrined in the Constitution. In a secular country like India, which promises to protect the rights of its citizens to practice religion and faith of his or her choice, rulings such as banning menstruating women to enter places of worship by priests are a violation of their rights. Women’s groups and organizations have come forward and challenged this whole notion of “purity-impurity” and are protesting against this unjust ruling by the temple heads in the name of god, religion, culture and practices. It seems that there is an increasing interest and inclination towards religion, and worship of gods and goddesses in recent years. This paper brings to limelight the violative provisions of law as a result of this unjust practice. Further, the paper will contrast certain cases with judicial responses on the related issues. Introduction: Human Rights these days is the most commonly debated topic, be it nationally or internationally. Those are rights that an individual possesses by virtue of being human and when the term human is used it should include both men as well as women, because it has become immensely important to understand that women also have these human rights because gender equality is there in the very core concept of human rights. -
Study of Housing Typologies in Mumbai
HOUSING TYPOLOGIES IN MUMBAI CRIT May 2007 HOUSING TYPOLOGIES IN MUMBAI CRIT May 2007 1 Research Team Prasad Shetty Rupali Gupte Ritesh Patil Aparna Parikh Neha Sabnis Benita Menezes CRIT would like to thank the Urban Age Programme, London School of Economics for providing financial support for this project. CRIT would also like to thank Yogita Lokhande, Chitra Venkatramani and Ubaid Ansari for their contributions in this project. Front Cover: Street in Fanaswadi, Inner City Area of Mumbai 2 Study of House Types in Mumbai As any other urban area with a dense history, Mumbai has several kinds of house types developed over various stages of its history. However, unlike in the case of many other cities all over the world, each one of its residences is invariably occupied by the city dwellers of this metropolis. Nothing is wasted or abandoned as old, unfitting, or dilapidated in this colossal economy. The housing condition of today’s Mumbai can be discussed through its various kinds of housing types, which form a bulk of the city’s lived spaces This study is intended towards making a compilation of house types in (and wherever relevant; around) Mumbai. House Type here means a generic representative form that helps in conceptualising all the houses that such a form represents. It is not a specific design executed by any important architect, which would be a-typical or unique. It is a form that is generated in a specific cultural epoch/condition. This generic ‘type’ can further have several variations and could be interestingly designed /interpreted / transformed by architects. -
FAITH SOLIDIFIED Two Most Sturdy Pillars of “Parsipanu”, The
RNI NO. MAHBIL/2011/39373 WWW.PARSI-TIMES.COM VOL. 1 - ISSUE 31 :: PAGES 24 :: ` 2 SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2011 FAITH SOLIDIFIED Two most sturdy pillars of “Parsipanu”, the Udvada Atashbehram and the Tata House give Parsi Times reasons to celebrate the week... Inside >>> SALGIRAH IN UDWADA! Pg. 12 EDUCATE YOURSELF! Pg. 14 SAY CHEESE! Pg. 15 THE TATA MISTRY SOLVED! Pg. 24 ZĞŐĚ͘KĸĐĞ͗s͘d͘DĂŶƐŝŽŶ͕ϭϰϰ͕WĞƌŝŶEĂƌŝŵĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&Žƌƚ͕DƵŵďĂŝϰϬϬϬϬϭ͘ dĞů͗͘ϮϮϲϵϵϯϵϵ͕ϮϮϲϱϳϱϵϵͻ&Ădž͗ϮϮϲϵϭϰϵϮ ͲŵĂŝů͗njŵďŚŝůůĂΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵͻtĞďƐŝƚĞ͗ǁǁǁ͘ŚŝůůĂďƵŝůĚĞƌƐ͘ĐŽŵ ƌĂŶĐŚKĸĐĞ͗,ŝůůĂdŽǁĞƌƐ͕D͘:͘tĂĚŝĂ&ŝƌĞdĞŵƉůĞŽŵƉůĞdž͕ƌ͘^͘^͘ZĂŽZŽĂĚ͕>ĂůďĂƵŐ͕ WĂƌĞů͕DƵŵďĂŝϰϬϬϬϭϮ͘dĞů͘EŽ͘Ϯϰϳϭϱϰϴϭ SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2011 02 Editorial FROM THE EDITOR’S DESK Dear Readers, It is a common known fact that some cities just don’t get along! Mumbai and Delhi people cold shoulder each other just as well as Californians and New Yorkers do! But I got to admit, a few days in the Capital for a Mumbai-ite like me wasn’t all that bad. The difference begins as you step off the plane. In Mumbai the hot air hits you, in Delhi it’s like the clouds just ate a Minto fresh and then paused to bellow ‘Hi!!!” The ‘mind-your-own-business’-ness of Mumbai people is quickly replaced by the Auntyji Analytical stares of Delhi. The cool collected ϐǤ But the roads of Delhi are heaven! Ten minutes into a drive and you are greeted by landscaping, proper signals, well organized pedestrian routes and Ǩϐǥ underrated charisma. Heritage has found a home in the capital. Large areas are cordoned off as archeological heritage sites. The amount of land dedicated to the stories of the past would make a Mumbai builder slash his wrists in greed and confusion! ϐ Ǥ ǡ everything. -
Brief of Amici Curiae
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO ! No. 32,549 ! ARTHUR FIRSTENBERG, ! Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. RAPHAELA MONRIBOT, ! Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant. __________________________________________________________________ ! On appeal from the First Judicial District Court, Division II, County of Santa Fe, State of New Mexico, The Hon. Sarah M. Singleton, Case No. D-101-CV-2010-29 __________________________________________________________________ ! BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF APPELLANT ! ! ! Dafna Tachover 2045 CR-23C East Jewett, NY 12424 (518) 734-5628 Attorney for Amici Curiae ! Stefanie Beninato PO Box 1601 Santa Fe, NM 87504 (505) 988-8022 local counsel TABLE OF CONTENTS The table of contents is empty because you aren't using the paragraph styles set to appear in it. Statement of Compliance ! In compliance with the limitations of Rule 12-213(F) NMRA, this brief is proportionally spaced and contains 10,532 words. The word count was obtained from Microsoft Office 2007. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES New Mexico Cases Lopez v. Las Cruces Police Department, 2006-NMCA-074, 139 N.M. 130, 137 P.3d 670 ..................................................14 State ex rel. Burg v. City of Albuquerque, 31 N.M. 576, 249 P. 242 (1926) ...........................................................................14 State v. Alberico, 1993-NMSC-47, 116 N.M. 156, 861 P.2d 192 ....................................................17 State v. Torres, 1999-NMSC-010, ¶ 34, 127 N.M. 20, 976 P.2d 20 .............................................17 Federal Cases Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) .............................................................................................17 Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) .................................................................................17 Other Cases National Parents Leadership et al. v. Minister of Education et al., Case No. -
In the High Court of Judicature at Bombay Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction Notice of Motion No
211-NMS2144-10-PIDILITE-F.DOC SHEPHALI IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2144 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO. 2130 OF 2010 1. PIDILITE INDUSTRIES LIMITED, A company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and having its office at Regent Chambers, Nariman Point, Mumbai 4"" "#1 2. HARDCASTLE & WAUD MANUFACTURING CO. LTD., A company incorporated under Indian Companies Act, 1913 having its office at Brabourne Stadium, Gate No. 10, 1st *+oor, 8-, Veer Nariman Road, Mumbai !"" 0#" And also at/ 190!, G$DC, 'arigam (.a+sad District2, (u3arat ...P !"#$"%%& Versus 1. VILAS NEMICHAND JAIN, trading as Ne4 Era Adhesive Industries, %, Bhi6amchand 7ain Comp+e8, 7a+gaon – !#5 0"1, District 7a+gaon 1MS2 2. M'S. NEW ERA, %, Bhi6amchand 7ain Comp+e8, 7a+gaon – Bombay!#5 0"1, District 7a+gaon High 1MS2 A9'O A; Court Post Sa6+i, ;a+u6a Ya4a+, 7a+gaon, Maharashtra – 4#5 3"#) ...D(%(#)!#$& 1 *% 2+ ::: Uploaded on - 14/09/2015 ::: Downloaded on - 07/10/2015 10:40:45 ::: 211-NMS2144-10-PIDILITE-F.DOC APPEARANCES FOR THE PLAINTIFFS D,. V. V. T- .!/-,0!,1 Se#"*, A)2*3!$(, with Mr. Sandip Parikh, Mr. Ashish Kamat, Mr. Rahul Duote, Mr. Minesh Andharia & Mr. Hemant Thadani, i/ Krishna & Saurastri Asso!iates. FOR THE DEFENDANTS D,. B. Sa,!%, with Mr. Vinod "ha#at, Mr. Dhiren Karania & Mr. Punit $ain, i/ %.S. He#de & V. "ha#at, &or De&endants 'os. 1 and ). CORAM 4 G. S. P!$( 1 J. JUDGMENT RESERVED ON 4 4$h Sept(67(, 2018 JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED ON 4 9$h S(/$(67(, 2018 JUDGMENT4 1. -
Working Papers
Working Papers www.mmg.mpg.de/workingpapers MMG Working Paper 13-04 ● ISSN 2192-2357 SUMEET MHASKAR Indian Muslims in a Global City: Socio-Political Effects on Economic Preferences in Contemporary Mumbai Religious and Ethnic Diversity und multiethnischer Gesellschaften Max Planck Institute for the Study of Max Planck Institute for the Study of Max-Planck-Institut zur Erforschung multireligiöser Sumeet Mhaskar Indian Muslims in a Global City: Socio-Political Effects on Economic Preferences in Contemporary Mumbai MMG Working Paper 13-04 Max-Planck-Institut zur Erforschung multireligiöser und multiethnischer Gesellschaften, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity Göttingen © 2013 by the author ISSN 2192-2357 (MMG Working Papers Print) Working Papers are the work of staff members as well as visitors to the Institute’s events. The analyses and opinions presented in the papers do not reflect those of the Institute but are those of the author alone. Download: www.mmg.mpg.de/workingpapers MPI zur Erforschung multireligiöser und multiethnischer Gesellschaften MPI for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity, Göttingen Hermann-Föge-Weg 11, 37073 Göttingen, Germany Tel.: +49 (551) 4956 - 0 Fax: +49 (551) 4956 - 170 www.mmg.mpg.de [email protected] Abstract This paper examines the effects of socio-political processes on economic preferences in Mumbai by focussing on the case of Muslim ex-millworkers. The argument of this paper is that the feeling of karahiyat [Urdu: nausea, disgust, hate, etc.] com- bined with suspicion, in terms of terrorism and mafia, creates barriers for Muslims’ employment and self-employment opportunities. The argument is substantiated by using the survey data of 924 ex-millworkers and in-depth interviews with 80 ex-mill- workers collected during 2008-09 and 2010-11. -
Freedom of Religion and the Indian Supreme Court: The
FREEDOM OF RELIGION AND THE INDIAN SUPREME COURT: THE RELIGIOUS DENOMINATION AND ESSENTIAL PRACTICES TESTS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN RELIGION MAY 2019 By Coleman D. Williams Thesis Committee: Ramdas Lamb, Chairperson Helen Baroni Ned Bertz Abstract As a religiously diverse society and self-proclaimed secular state, India is an ideal setting to explore the complex and often controversial intersections between religion and law. The religious freedom clauses of the Indian Constitution allow for the state to regulate and restrict certain activities associated with religious practice. By interpreting the constitutional provisions for religious freedom, the judiciary plays an important role in determining the extent to which the state can lawfully regulate religious affairs. This thesis seeks to historicize the related development of two jurisprudential tests employed by the Supreme Court of India: the religious denomination test and the essential practices test. The religious denomination test gives the Court the authority to determine which groups constitute religious denominations, and therefore, qualify for legal protection. The essential practices test limits the constitutional protection of religious practices to those that are deemed ‘essential’ to the respective faith. From their origins in the 1950s up to their application in contemporary cases on religious freedom, these two tests have served to limit the scope of legal protection under the Constitution and legitimize the interventionist tendencies of the Indian state. Additionally, this thesis will discuss the principles behind the operation of the two tests, their most prominent criticisms, and the potential implications of the Court’s approach.