DOCSLIB.ORG

LIST of ATTORNEYS DISCLAIMER: the U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LIST of ATTORNEYS DISCLAIMER: the U.S UPDATED: APRIL 2017 LIST OF ATTORNEYS DISCLAIMER: The U.S. Consulate General, Mumbai, India, assumes no responsibility or liability for the professional ability or reputation of, or the quality of services provided by, the following persons or firms. Inclusion on this list is in no way an endorsement by the Department of State or the U.S. Consulate. The order in which the names appear has no significance in the reputation or quality of services that they provide. The information in the list on professional credentials, areas of expertise and language ability are provided directly by the lawyers; the Consulate is not in a position to vouch for such information. You may receive additional information about the individuals on the list by contacting the local licensing authorities. NOTE: When calling from the U.S., first dial 011 (for an international call), then 91 (the country code for India). The appropriate city and state codes are provided in front of each phone number. CITY CONTACT INFO SPECIALTIES/REMARKS Mumbai Bombay Bar Association Room No. 57, 3 rd Floor Mr. Rahul Chitnis, Honorary Secretary High Court Building Mumbai 400 032 Tel: (022) 56333901 Cell: 9821020330 Phone: 91-22-2267-3367 Email: [email protected] Ahmedabad Bar Council of Gujarat Satyamev Complex Opp. Gujarat High Court Sola, Ahmedabad 380060 Tel/Fax: (079) 27434073 Tel: (079) 27433460 Nilesh Panchal - 9898599808 Ahmedabad Harendra Madanlal Bhagat Practicing in Ahmedabad over 30 years Baiju Bhagat – Managing Partner Represents U.S. Law firms H. M. Bhagat & Co. Attorney, Advocates, Solicitor and Notary, Fields of expertise: Industry House, Behind Old Nataraj Family Law, Adoptions, Child custody, Cinema, Natraj Cinema, Opp. Medical Hall, Parental child abduction, Child protection, Ashram Road, Ahmedabad 380 009 Marriage, Divorce. Off. Tel: (079)26584333, 26584334; Res. Tel: (079)26444343 Off. Fax(079)26584334 Cell: 9824015085 E-mail: [email protected]/ [email protected] Ahmedabad MR. RUSTOM RATAN MARSHALL Practicing Advocate in the Gujarat High MR. NISHMIN RUSTOM MARSHALL Court in constitutional, civil and criminal Zodiac Square matters for about last 25 years. Expert in rd 3 floor, Opp. Gurudwara, S.G. Road matters relating to corporate houses and Ahmedabad 3800054 also on behalf of Semi Government Tel: (079) 27484258, 8229293 Updated: APRIL 2017 Fax: (079) 27484258 organizations like Municipal Corporations, Urban Development Authorities and Res: 143 Sunrise Park Nationalized Insurance Companies. Opp: Drive-in-Cinema Drive-in Road Ahmedabad Also undertakes work in other cities Tel: (079) 26850770, 26851278 besides Ahmedabad and also gives special Mobile: 98250-32543 consultation and legal advice to people who Email: [email protected] are desirous of doing business in India and more particularly in Gujarat. Anand Arti K. Pandya Advocate & Notary for Government of 6 Arya Samaj Shopping Center, Ishwar Gujarat Petlikar Marg, Nr N.K. Solanki Hall, Anand Off.Tel: (079)250696, Cell: 9426523868 Res: 701 Vaibhav Tower, Anand- Vidyanagar Road, Anand 388001 Res Tel: (079) 246726 Daman Yusuf S. Ghia Advocate Practicing advocate in the Union Territory 14, Basement Umesh Complex of Daman. Appointed as Notary Public. Char Rasta, Nani Daman DAMAN 396 210 Gujarat Mobile: 0-9228489946 Office: 0-9228858116 Email: [email protected] Mumbai ADVANI & CO. Practicing in Mumbai over 15 years. - Office: 10 Thakur Niwas, Level 2, 173 Fields of expertise: Pune Jamshedji Tata Road, Arbitration, disputes in connection with Mumbai 400 020; bank guarantees, joint ventures and all Off.Tel: (022) 22021347, 22818380, commercial disputes, and in oil and natural 22818381, 22818382 gas projects. Also handles real estate, Off. Fax: 22865040 government relations, banking, project Email: [email protected] finance, admiralty and airline related The principals in the firm are: disputes and finance, joint ventures and overseas collaborations, taxation and Ashok H. Advani corporate law. Res. Tel: (022)22874755; Will take cases outside of the City. Hiroo H. Advani Res. Tel: (022) 23515076; Habib H. Datoobhoy Res. Tel: (022) 23513050, 23643050. The firm's principal office is in Mumbai. It has an office in Pune (Tel: (020)26122940; fax: (020)26122948) Mumbai Ms. Rati Amrolia Practicing in Mumbai over 26 years Advocate High Court KRY LEGAL LAW FIRM Fields of expertise: Office: 5 A Sunita Banking/Financial, Commercial/Business 62 C Peddar Road Law, Foreign Investments, Marketing Mumbai 400 036 Agreements, Criminal Law, Commercial Off. Tel: (022) 23806379/80/81 Law, Contracts, Estates. Updated: APRIL 2017 Res. Tel: (022) 23854386 Is now a Special Public Prosecutor Cell: 9820136339 representing Central Government Agencies Bar Association: (022) 22673387 like NCB, DRI and hence cannot do private H C Library: (022) 22673418 work in Narcotics. Cell: 9820136339 Email: [email protected]; [email protected] Mumbai Mr. Hitesh J Sanghvi. Practicing in Mumbai for more than 11 Hitesh Sanghvi Law Offices. years and is a member at Bar Council of 5th & 6th Floor, Regus, Mafatlal House, Maharashtra & Goa. H. T. Parekh Marg, Backbay Reclamation, Mumbai – 400 020 India Fields of expertise: M: +91 9820496799 Family Law, Adoptions, Child Custody, T: +91 22 4348 4050 Parental Child Abduction, Child Protection, E: [email protected] Insurance, Banking/Finance, Commercial Business Law, Foreign Investments, Marketing Agreements, Patents/Trademarks/Copyrights, Civil Law, Damages, Collections, Commercial Law, Contracts, Transportation Law, Corporations, Foreign Claims, Estate, Government relations, Labor Relations, Immigration. Mumbai Mr. Bhat Shrikant Criminal Lawyer Attorney, 11, Ida Mansion, 18 Vaju Kotak Marg, Ballard Estate, Mumbai - 400 001 Off. Tel: (022) 22614981 Off. Fax: (022) 22679841 Res. Tel: (022) 24076506 Email: [email protected] Mumbai CONSULTA JURIS Practicing in Mumbai over 20 years. Office: Mittal Court, 81 & 82-C Wing, 8th floor, Fields of expertise: Nariman Point, Adoption, child custody, civil damage, Mumbai 400 021 estates, government relations, marriage & divorce, taxes, aeronautical & maritime, Off.Tel: (022) 22835050, 22610794 banking & financial, collections, contracts, Off. Fax: (022) 22811616, 22821616 corporations, foreign claims, foreign Email: [email protected] website: investment, insurance, investment in raw http://www/cj-law.com materials, labor relations, marketing agreements, mining and petroleum, Usha Srivastav (partner) patents, trademarks, copyrights, auto Mobile: 9821139141 accidents, immigration, narcotics, fraud, embezzlement, currency violation, extradition, criminal cases. Will take cases outside of the city Mumbai CRAWFORD BAYLEY & COMPANY Practicing in Mumbai over 15 years Office: State Bank Buildings, Represents U.S. Law firms N. G. N. Vaidya Road, Fort, Mumbai 400 023 Fields of expertise: Insurance, Banking/Financial, Updated: APRIL 2017 Off. Tel: (022) 22663713, 22660699, Commercial/Business Law, Foreign 22660910, 22660488, 22665443 Investments, Marketing Agreements, Off. Fax: (022)22660355, 22660986, Patents/Trademarks/Copyrights, Civil Law, 22663978 Damages, Collections, Law, Contracts, Transportation Law, Corporations Mr. Prashant Asher, Advocate Aeronautical/Maritime, Foreign Claims, Mr. H. C. Asher Estates, Taxes, Government relations, Direct Tel: (022) 22613850 Labor Relations, Immigration. Cell: 9820068003 Services of a certified translator, court Email: reporter/stenographer or notary. [email protected] Will take cases outside of the City R. A. Shah Z.M. Talaty (Ms) D.B. Engineer M.Ph. A. Wadia H.C. Asher S.S. Rege C.M. Maniar K.S. Trivedi D.C. Shroff S.R. Buch S.K. Asher P.K. Asher Mumbai Shishir Babubhai Desai Practicing in Mumbai over 30 years DESAI & CHINOY Solicitors & Represents U.S. Law firms Advocates Office: 88-B, Mittal Towers, Fields of expertise: Nariman Point Adoptions, Child Custody, Parental Child Mumbai 400021 Abduction, Child Protection, Marriage/Divorce, Insurance, Off. Tel: (022) 22874633; 22832808; Banking/Financial, Commercial/Business 22041753 Law, Foreign Investments, Marketing Off. Fax: (022)2284-6644 Agreements, Email: [email protected] Patents/Trademarks/Copyrights, Civil Law, Criminal Law, Damages, Narcotics, Collections, Commercial Law, Contracts, Merzi Kersy Chinoy Transportation Law, Corporations Aeronautical/Maritime, Foreign Claims, Estates, Taxes, Government relations, Labor Relations, Immigration, Auto/Accidents. Services of a certified translator, court reporter/stenographer or notary. Mumbai Shuva Mandal Practicing in Mumbai over 17 years Fox Mandal & Associates Fields of expertise: Office:1105 Dalamal Towers Family Law, Adoption, Child Custody, Child 211 Free Press Journal Marg Protection, Marriage/Divorce, Insurance, Nariman Point Banking/Financial, Commercial/Business Mumbai 400 021 Law, Patents/Trademarks/Copyrights, Civil Law, Damages, Collections, Commercial Off. Tel: 66333636 Law, Contracts, Transportation Law, Off. Fax: 66333700 Corporations, Taxes, E-Mail: [email protected] Aeronautical/Maritime, Foreign Claims, Estates, Government relations, Labor Relations, Immigrations, Auto/Accidents. Will take cases outside of the City. Has an office in Bangalore, Chennai, Hyderabad & Kochi. Mumbai Mr. Rustam J. Gagrat Practicing in Mumbai over 29 years Updated: APRIL 2017 Gagrat Advocates & Solicitors Represents U.S. Law firms Office: Alli Chambers Nagindas Master Road Fields of expertise: Mumbai 400 001 Insurance, Banking/Financial, Commercial/Business
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bombay High Court
    2007 Bombay High Court 2007 JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL S 7142128 S 4111825S 4111825S 1 8 15 22 29 M 1 8152229 M 51219 26 M 51219 26 M 2 9 16 23 30 T 2 9162330 T 6132027 T 6132027 T 3101724 W 3 10 17 24 31 W 7142128 W 7142128W 4111825 T 4 11 18 25 T 1 8 15 22 T 1 8 15 22 29 T 5121926 F 5 12 19 26 F 2916 23 F 2 9 16 23 30 F 6 13 20 27 S 61320 27 S 31017 24 S 3 10 17 24 31 S 7 14 21 28 1. Sundays, Second & Fourth Saturdays and other Holidays are shown in red. MAY 2. The Summer Vacation of the Court will commence on Monday the 7th May, JUNE S 6132027 2007 and the Court will resume its sitting on Monday the 4th June, 2007. S 3101724 3. The court will remain closed on account of October Vacation from 5th M 7142128 November to 18th November, 2007. M 4111825 T 1 8 15 22 29 4. Christmas Vacation from 24th December, 2007 to 6th January, 2008. T 5121926 5. Id-uz-Zuha, Muharram, Milad-un-Nabi, Id-ul-Fitr and Id-uz-Zuha W 2 9 16 23 30 respectively are subject to change depending upon the visibility of the W 6132027 T 3 10 17 24 31 Moon. If the Government of India declares any change in these dates through T 7142128 TV/AIR/Newspaper, the same will be followed. F 4 11 18 25 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The High Court at Bombay (Extension of Jurisdiction to Goa, Daman and Diu) Act, 1981 Act No
    THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY (EXTENSION OF JURISDICTION TO GOA, DAMAN AND DIU) ACT, 1981 ACT NO. 26 OF 1981 [9th September, 1981.] An Act to provide for the extension of the jurisdiction of the High Court at Bombay to the Union territory of Goa, Daman and Diu, for the establishment of a permanent bench of that High Court at Panaji and for matters connected therewith. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Thirty-second Year of the Republic of India as follows:— 1. Short title and commencement.—(1) This Act may be called the High Court at Bombay (Extension of Jurisdiction to Goa, Daman and Diu) Act, 1981. (2) It shall come into force on such date1 as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint. 2. Definitions.—In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,— (a) “appointed day” means the date on which this Act comes into force; (b) “Court of the Judicial Commissioner” means the Court of the Judicial Commissioner for Goa, Daman and Diu. 3. Extension of jurisdiction of Bombay High Court to Goa, Daman and Diu.—(1) On and from the appointed day, the jurisdiction of the High Court at Bombay shall extend to the Union territory of Goa, Daman and Diu. (2) On and from the appointed day, the Court of the Judicial Commissioner shall cease to function and is hereby abolished: Provided that nothing in this sub-section shall prejudice or affect the continued operation of any notice served, injunction issued, direction given or proceedings taken before the appointed day by the Court of the Judicial Commissioner, abolished by this sub-section, under the powers then conferred upon that Court.
    [Show full text]
  • In the High Court of Judicature at Bombay
    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION \9 NOTICE OF MOTION(NO.S2J"OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1286 OF 2018 Mumbai Cricket Association. ... Applicant (Original Respondent No.1) In the matter between NadimMemon ... Petitioner VERSUS Mumbai Cricket Association &Ors ... Respondents. INDEX Date Exh.No. Particulars Page No. Proforma Notice of Motion 1-8 Affidavit in support of Notice of . 9-15 Motion ". , 6/4/2018. A. Copy of order. 16-2~ 2/5/2018 B. News paper report in Times ofIndia 23 2/5/2018 C. Copy of Minutes of Committee of 24 Administrators of Respondent No.1 ~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1286 OF 2018 Mumbai Cricket Association, a public ) Trust registered under the provisions of ) Bombay public trust Act, 1950 as also a ) Society registered under the provision of the ) Societies Registration Act, 1860 having its ) Office at Cricket Center, Wankhede Stadium, ) Churchgate Mumbai- 400020. ) .. '" Applicant (Original Respondent No.1) In the matter between:- Nadim Memon, an adult Indian Inhabitant ) Occupation ;- Business having his address at ) 22, Rustom Sidwa Marg, Fort, Mumbai - 400 001 ) ... Petitioner Vis 1) Mumbai Cricket Association, a public ) Trust registered under the provisions of ) Bombay public trust Act, 1950 as also a ) Society registered under the provision of the ) Societies Registration Act, 1860 having its ) Office at Cricket Center, Wankhede Stadium, ) Churchgate Mumbai- 400020. ) v 2) Wizcraft International Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. ) A company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 ) Having its registered office at Satyadev Plaza, ) 5th Floor, Fun Republic Lane, Off.
    [Show full text]
  • Reportable in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay
    WWW.LIVELAW.IN Board of Control for Cricket in India vs Deccan Chronicle Holding Ltd CARBPL-4466-20-J.docx GP A/W AGK & SSM REPORTABLE IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION COMM ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO. 4466 OF 2020 Board of Control for Cricket in India, a society registered under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act 1975 and having its head office at Cricket Centre, Wankhede Stadium, Mumbai 400 020 … Petitioner ~ versus ~ Deccan Chronicle Holdings Ltd, a company incorporated under the Companies Act 1956 and having its registered office at 36, Sarojini Devi Road, Secunderabad, Andhra Pradesh … Respondent appearances Mr Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General, with FOR THE PETITIONER Samrat Sen, Kanu Agrawal, Indranil “BCCI” Deshmukh, Adarsh Saxena, Ms R Shah and Kartik Prasad, Advocates i/b Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas Page 1 of 176 16th June 2021 ::: Uploaded on - 16/06/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 16/06/2021 17:38:08 ::: WWW.LIVELAW.IN Board of Control for Cricket in India vs Deccan Chronicle Holding Ltd CARBPL-4466-20-J.docx Mr Haresh Jagtiani, Senior Advocate, with Mr Navroz Seervai, Senior Advocate, FOR THE RESPONDENT Mr Sharan Jagtiani, Senior Advocate, “DCHL” Yashpal Jain, Suprabh Jain, Ankit Pandey, Ms Rishika Harish & Ms Bhumika Chulani, Advocates i/b Yashpal Jain CORAM : GS Patel, J JUDGMENT RESERVED ON : 12th January 2021 JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED ON : 16th June 2021 JUDGMENT: OUTLINE OF CONTENTS This judgment is arranged in the following parts. A. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................ 4 B. THE CHALLENGE IN BRIEF; SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS................................................ 6 C. THE AMBIT OF SECTION 34 .................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FEZANA Journal Do Not Necessarily Reflect the Feroza Fitch of Views of FEZANA Or Members of This Publication's Editorial Board
    FEZANA FEZANA JOURNAL ZEMESTAN 1379 AY 3748 ZRE VOL. 24, NO. 4 WINTER/DECEMBER 2010 G WINTER/DECEMBER 2010 JOURJO N AL Dae – Behman – Spendarmad 1379 AY (Fasli) G Amordad – Shehrever – Meher 1380 AY (Shenshai) G Shehrever – Meher – Avan 1380 AY (Kadimi) CELEBRATING 1000 YEARS Ferdowsi’s Shahnameh: The Soul of Iran HAPPY NEW YEAR 2011 Also Inside: Earliest surviving manuscripts Sorabji Pochkhanawala: India’s greatest banker Obama questioned by Zoroastrian students U.S. Presidential Executive Mission PUBLICATION OF THE FEDERATION OF ZOROASTRIAN ASSOCIATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA PUBLICATION OF THE FEDERATION OF ZOROASTRIAN ASSOCIATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA Vol 24 No 4 Winter / December 2010 Zemestan 1379 AY 3748 ZRE President Bomi V Patel www.fezana.org Editor in Chief: Dolly Dastoor 2 Editorial [email protected] Technical Assistant: Coomi Gazdar Dolly Dastoor Assistant to Editor: Dinyar Patel Consultant Editor: Lylah M. Alphonse, [email protected] 6 Financial Report Graphic & Layout: Shahrokh Khanizadeh, www.khanizadeh.info Cover design: Feroza Fitch, 8 FEZANA UPDATE-World Youth Congress [email protected] Publications Chair: Behram Pastakia Columnists: Hoshang Shroff: [email protected] Shazneen Rabadi Gandhi : [email protected] 12 SHAHNAMEH-the Soul of Iran Yezdi Godiwalla: [email protected] Behram Panthaki::[email protected] Behram Pastakia: [email protected] Mahrukh Motafram: [email protected] 50 IN THE NEWS Copy editors: R Mehta, V Canteenwalla Subscription Managers: Arnavaz Sethna: [email protected];
    [Show full text]
  • LAW MANTRA THINK BEYOND OTHERS (I.S.S.N 2321- 6417 (Online) Ph: +918255090897 Website: Journal.Lawmantra.Co.In E-Mail: [email protected] [email protected]
    LAW MANTRA THINK BEYOND OTHERS (I.S.S.N 2321- 6417 (Online) Ph: +918255090897 Website: journal.lawmantra.co.in E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] INGRESSION OF WOMEN IN PLACES OF WORSHIP AN EQUALITY DIMENSION Abstract:- The bans such as women’s entry into temples involve notions and norms which directly clash with ideas of modernity and are also incompatible with rights enshrined in the Constitution. In a secular country like India, which promises to protect the rights of its citizens to practice religion and faith of his or her choice, rulings such as banning menstruating women to enter places of worship by priests are a violation of their rights. Women’s groups and organizations have come forward and challenged this whole notion of “purity-impurity” and are protesting against this unjust ruling by the temple heads in the name of god, religion, culture and practices. It seems that there is an increasing interest and inclination towards religion, and worship of gods and goddesses in recent years. This paper brings to limelight the violative provisions of law as a result of this unjust practice. Further, the paper will contrast certain cases with judicial responses on the related issues. Introduction: Human Rights these days is the most commonly debated topic, be it nationally or internationally. Those are rights that an individual possesses by virtue of being human and when the term human is used it should include both men as well as women, because it has become immensely important to understand that women also have these human rights because gender equality is there in the very core concept of human rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of Housing Typologies in Mumbai
    HOUSING TYPOLOGIES IN MUMBAI CRIT May 2007 HOUSING TYPOLOGIES IN MUMBAI CRIT May 2007 1 Research Team Prasad Shetty Rupali Gupte Ritesh Patil Aparna Parikh Neha Sabnis Benita Menezes CRIT would like to thank the Urban Age Programme, London School of Economics for providing financial support for this project. CRIT would also like to thank Yogita Lokhande, Chitra Venkatramani and Ubaid Ansari for their contributions in this project. Front Cover: Street in Fanaswadi, Inner City Area of Mumbai 2 Study of House Types in Mumbai As any other urban area with a dense history, Mumbai has several kinds of house types developed over various stages of its history. However, unlike in the case of many other cities all over the world, each one of its residences is invariably occupied by the city dwellers of this metropolis. Nothing is wasted or abandoned as old, unfitting, or dilapidated in this colossal economy. The housing condition of today’s Mumbai can be discussed through its various kinds of housing types, which form a bulk of the city’s lived spaces This study is intended towards making a compilation of house types in (and wherever relevant; around) Mumbai. House Type here means a generic representative form that helps in conceptualising all the houses that such a form represents. It is not a specific design executed by any important architect, which would be a-typical or unique. It is a form that is generated in a specific cultural epoch/condition. This generic ‘type’ can further have several variations and could be interestingly designed /interpreted / transformed by architects.
    [Show full text]
  • FAITH SOLIDIFIED Two Most Sturdy Pillars of “Parsipanu”, The
    RNI NO. MAHBIL/2011/39373 WWW.PARSI-TIMES.COM VOL. 1 - ISSUE 31 :: PAGES 24 :: ` 2 SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2011 FAITH SOLIDIFIED Two most sturdy pillars of “Parsipanu”, the Udvada Atashbehram and the Tata House give Parsi Times reasons to celebrate the week... Inside >>> SALGIRAH IN UDWADA! Pg. 12 EDUCATE YOURSELF! Pg. 14 SAY CHEESE! Pg. 15 THE TATA MISTRY SOLVED! Pg. 24 ZĞŐĚ͘KĸĐĞ͗s͘d͘DĂŶƐŝŽŶ͕ϭϰϰ͕WĞƌŝŶEĂƌŝŵĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕&Žƌƚ͕DƵŵďĂŝϰϬϬϬϬϭ͘ dĞů͗͘ϮϮϲϵϵϯϵϵ͕ϮϮϲϱϳϱϵϵͻ&Ădž͗ϮϮϲϵϭϰϵϮ ͲŵĂŝů͗njŵďŚŝůůĂΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵͻtĞďƐŝƚĞ͗ǁǁǁ͘ŚŝůůĂďƵŝůĚĞƌƐ͘ĐŽŵ ƌĂŶĐŚKĸĐĞ͗,ŝůůĂdŽǁĞƌƐ͕D͘:͘tĂĚŝĂ&ŝƌĞdĞŵƉůĞŽŵƉůĞdž͕ƌ͘^͘^͘ZĂŽZŽĂĚ͕>ĂůďĂƵŐ͕ WĂƌĞů͕DƵŵďĂŝϰϬϬϬϭϮ͘dĞů͘EŽ͘Ϯϰϳϭϱϰϴϭ SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2011 02 Editorial FROM THE EDITOR’S DESK Dear Readers, It is a common known fact that some cities just don’t get along! Mumbai and Delhi people cold shoulder each other just as well as Californians and New Yorkers do! But I got to admit, a few days in the Capital for a Mumbai-ite like me wasn’t all that bad. The difference begins as you step off the plane. In Mumbai the hot air hits you, in Delhi it’s like the clouds just ate a Minto fresh and then paused to bellow ‘Hi!!!” The ‘mind-your-own-business’-ness of Mumbai people is quickly replaced by the Auntyji Analytical stares of Delhi. The cool collected ϐǤ But the roads of Delhi are heaven! Ten minutes into a drive and you are greeted by landscaping, proper signals, well organized pedestrian routes and Ǩϐǥ underrated charisma. Heritage has found a home in the capital. Large areas are cordoned off as archeological heritage sites. The amount of land dedicated to the stories of the past would make a Mumbai builder slash his wrists in greed and confusion! ϐ Ǥ ǡ everything.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief of Amici Curiae
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO ! No. 32,549 ! ARTHUR FIRSTENBERG, ! Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. RAPHAELA MONRIBOT, ! Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant. __________________________________________________________________ ! On appeal from the First Judicial District Court, Division II, County of Santa Fe, State of New Mexico, The Hon. Sarah M. Singleton, Case No. D-101-CV-2010-29 __________________________________________________________________ ! BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF APPELLANT ! ! ! Dafna Tachover 2045 CR-23C East Jewett, NY 12424 (518) 734-5628 Attorney for Amici Curiae ! Stefanie Beninato PO Box 1601 Santa Fe, NM 87504 (505) 988-8022 local counsel TABLE OF CONTENTS The table of contents is empty because you aren't using the paragraph styles set to appear in it. Statement of Compliance ! In compliance with the limitations of Rule 12-213(F) NMRA, this brief is proportionally spaced and contains 10,532 words. The word count was obtained from Microsoft Office 2007. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES New Mexico Cases Lopez v. Las Cruces Police Department, 2006-NMCA-074, 139 N.M. 130, 137 P.3d 670 ..................................................14 State ex rel. Burg v. City of Albuquerque, 31 N.M. 576, 249 P. 242 (1926) ...........................................................................14 State v. Alberico, 1993-NMSC-47, 116 N.M. 156, 861 P.2d 192 ....................................................17 State v. Torres, 1999-NMSC-010, ¶ 34, 127 N.M. 20, 976 P.2d 20 .............................................17 Federal Cases Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) .............................................................................................17 Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923) .................................................................................17 Other Cases National Parents Leadership et al. v. Minister of Education et al., Case No.
    [Show full text]
  • In the High Court of Judicature at Bombay Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction Notice of Motion No
    211-NMS2144-10-PIDILITE-F.DOC SHEPHALI IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2144 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO. 2130 OF 2010 1. PIDILITE INDUSTRIES LIMITED, A company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and having its office at Regent Chambers, Nariman Point, Mumbai 4"" "#1 2. HARDCASTLE & WAUD MANUFACTURING CO. LTD., A company incorporated under Indian Companies Act, 1913 having its office at Brabourne Stadium, Gate No. 10, 1st *+oor, 8-, Veer Nariman Road, Mumbai !"" 0#" And also at/ 190!, G$DC, 'arigam (.a+sad District2, (u3arat ...P !"#$"%%& Versus 1. VILAS NEMICHAND JAIN, trading as Ne4 Era Adhesive Industries, %, Bhi6amchand 7ain Comp+e8, 7a+gaon – !#5 0"1, District 7a+gaon 1MS2 2. M'S. NEW ERA, %, Bhi6amchand 7ain Comp+e8, 7a+gaon – Bombay!#5 0"1, District 7a+gaon High 1MS2 A9'O A; Court Post Sa6+i, ;a+u6a Ya4a+, 7a+gaon, Maharashtra – 4#5 3"#) ...D(%(#)!#$& 1 *% 2+ ::: Uploaded on - 14/09/2015 ::: Downloaded on - 07/10/2015 10:40:45 ::: 211-NMS2144-10-PIDILITE-F.DOC APPEARANCES FOR THE PLAINTIFFS D,. V. V. T- .!/-,0!,1 Se#"*, A)2*3!$(, with Mr. Sandip Parikh, Mr. Ashish Kamat, Mr. Rahul Duote, Mr. Minesh Andharia & Mr. Hemant Thadani, i/ Krishna & Saurastri Asso!iates. FOR THE DEFENDANTS D,. B. Sa,!%, with Mr. Vinod "ha#at, Mr. Dhiren Karania & Mr. Punit $ain, i/ %.S. He#de & V. "ha#at, &or De&endants 'os. 1 and ). CORAM 4 G. S. P!$( 1 J. JUDGMENT RESERVED ON 4 4$h Sept(67(, 2018 JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED ON 4 9$h S(/$(67(, 2018 JUDGMENT4 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Papers
    Working Papers www.mmg.mpg.de/workingpapers MMG Working Paper 13-04 ● ISSN 2192-2357 SUMEET MHASKAR Indian Muslims in a Global City: Socio-Political Effects on Economic Preferences in Contemporary Mumbai Religious and Ethnic Diversity und multiethnischer Gesellschaften Max Planck Institute for the Study of Max Planck Institute for the Study of Max-Planck-Institut zur Erforschung multireligiöser Sumeet Mhaskar Indian Muslims in a Global City: Socio-Political Effects on Economic Preferences in Contemporary Mumbai MMG Working Paper 13-04 Max-Planck-Institut zur Erforschung multireligiöser und multiethnischer Gesellschaften, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity Göttingen © 2013 by the author ISSN 2192-2357 (MMG Working Papers Print) Working Papers are the work of staff members as well as visitors to the Institute’s events. The analyses and opinions presented in the papers do not reflect those of the Institute but are those of the author alone. Download: www.mmg.mpg.de/workingpapers MPI zur Erforschung multireligiöser und multiethnischer Gesellschaften MPI for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity, Göttingen Hermann-Föge-Weg 11, 37073 Göttingen, Germany Tel.: +49 (551) 4956 - 0 Fax: +49 (551) 4956 - 170 www.mmg.mpg.de [email protected] Abstract This paper examines the effects of socio-political processes on economic preferences in Mumbai by focussing on the case of Muslim ex-millworkers. The argument of this paper is that the feeling of karahiyat [Urdu: nausea, disgust, hate, etc.] com- bined with suspicion, in terms of terrorism and mafia, creates barriers for Muslims’ employment and self-employment opportunities. The argument is substantiated by using the survey data of 924 ex-millworkers and in-depth interviews with 80 ex-mill- workers collected during 2008-09 and 2010-11.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom of Religion and the Indian Supreme Court: The
    FREEDOM OF RELIGION AND THE INDIAN SUPREME COURT: THE RELIGIOUS DENOMINATION AND ESSENTIAL PRACTICES TESTS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN RELIGION MAY 2019 By Coleman D. Williams Thesis Committee: Ramdas Lamb, Chairperson Helen Baroni Ned Bertz Abstract As a religiously diverse society and self-proclaimed secular state, India is an ideal setting to explore the complex and often controversial intersections between religion and law. The religious freedom clauses of the Indian Constitution allow for the state to regulate and restrict certain activities associated with religious practice. By interpreting the constitutional provisions for religious freedom, the judiciary plays an important role in determining the extent to which the state can lawfully regulate religious affairs. This thesis seeks to historicize the related development of two jurisprudential tests employed by the Supreme Court of India: the religious denomination test and the essential practices test. The religious denomination test gives the Court the authority to determine which groups constitute religious denominations, and therefore, qualify for legal protection. The essential practices test limits the constitutional protection of religious practices to those that are deemed ‘essential’ to the respective faith. From their origins in the 1950s up to their application in contemporary cases on religious freedom, these two tests have served to limit the scope of legal protection under the Constitution and legitimize the interventionist tendencies of the Indian state. Additionally, this thesis will discuss the principles behind the operation of the two tests, their most prominent criticisms, and the potential implications of the Court’s approach.
    [Show full text]