Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 14241) Transportation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 14241) Transportation Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 14241) Transportation Resources Study Study Plan Section 15.7 Initial Study Report Prepared for Alaska Energy Authority Prepared by DOWL-HKM February 2014 Draft INITIAL STUDY REPORT TRANSPORTATION RESOURCES STUDY (15.7) TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... vi 1. Introduction............................................................................................................................ 1 2. Study Objectives .................................................................................................................... 1 3. Study Area .............................................................................................................................. 2 4. Methods and Variances in 2013 ............................................................................................ 2 4.1. Collect and Review Data ................................................................................................ 2 4.1.1. Variances................................................................................................................. 2 4.2. Inventory Assets and Conduct Any Field Studies ......................................................... 2 4.2.1. Variances................................................................................................................. 2 4.3. Document Existing Conditions ...................................................................................... 3 4.3.1. Variances................................................................................................................. 3 4.4. Forecast Future Conditions ............................................................................................ 4 4.4.1. Variances................................................................................................................. 4 4.5. Evaluate Effects ............................................................................................................. 4 5. Results ..................................................................................................................................... 5 5.1. Collect and Review Data ................................................................................................ 5 5.2. Inventory Assets and Field Studies ................................................................................ 5 5.3. Existing Conditions ........................................................................................................ 6 5.3.1. Roadways ................................................................................................................ 6 5.3.2. Aviation................................................................................................................... 9 5.3.3. Railroad ................................................................................................................. 10 5.3.4. Ports ...................................................................................................................... 12 5.3.5. Susitna River Transportation ................................................................................ 14 5.3.6. Easements ............................................................................................................. 14 5.4. Future Conditions ......................................................................................................... 15 5.4.1. Roadways .............................................................................................................. 15 5.4.2. Aviation................................................................................................................. 19 5.4.3. Railroad ................................................................................................................. 21 5.4.4. Port ........................................................................................................................ 23 6. Discussion ............................................................................................................................. 25 Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority FERC Project No. 14241 Page i February 2014 Draft INITIAL STUDY REPORT TRANSPORTATION RESOURCES STUDY (15.7) 7. Completing the Study .......................................................................................................... 25 8. Literature Cited ................................................................................................................... 25 9. Figures .................................................................................................................................. 27 APPENDICES Appendix A: Bibliography Appendix B: Asset Inventory Appendix C: Highway Data for Future Traffic, Funded Projects, and Planned Projects Appendix D: Aviation Data for Future Operations, Funded Projects and Planned Projects Appendix E: Rail Data for Future Traffic, Funded Projects, and Planned Projects Appendix F: Port Data for Future Operations, Funded Projects and Planned Projects Appendix G: Interview Summaries Appendix H: Commercial Vehicle Size, Weight & Permit Regulations (17 AAC 25) Appendix I: Municipality of Anchorage Truck Routes Appendix J: Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Seasonal Weight Restrictions Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority FERC Project No. 14241 Page ii February 2014 Draft INITIAL STUDY REPORT TRANSPORTATION RESOURCES STUDY (15.7) List of Figures Figure 5.3-1. Weight and Lane Restricted Denali Highway Bridges ........................................... 28 Figure 5.3-2. Study Area RS 2477 and 17(b) Easements ............................................................. 29 Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority FERC Project No. 14241 Page iii February 2014 Draft INITIAL STUDY REPORT TRANSPORTATION RESOURCES STUDY (15.7) LIST OF ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND DEFINITIONS Abbreviation Definition AAC Alaska Administrative Code AADT Annual Average Daily Traffic ADF&G Alaska Department of Fish and Game ADNR Alaska Department of Natural Resources ADOT&PF Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities AEA Alaska Energy Authority AIAS Alaska International Airport System ALP airport layout plan AMATS Anchorage Metropolitan Area Transportation Solutions AMP Airport Master Plan ANCSA Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act ARFF Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting ARRC Alaska Railroad Corporation BLM DOI, Bureau of Land Management CFR Code of Federal Regulations FAA Federal Aviation Administration FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission FIA Fairbanks International Airport FMATS Fairbanks Metropolitan Area Transportation System FTA Federal Transit Administration FFY federal fiscal year FY State fiscal year GA General Aviation ILP Integrated Licensing Process ISR Initial Study Report KGB Knik-Goose Bay LCV Long Combination Vehicles LOS Level of Service LRTP Long Range Transportation Plan MOA Municipality of Anchorage MTP Metropolitan Transportation Plan MP milepost MSB Matanuska-Susitna Borough Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority FERC Project No. 14241 Page iv February 2014 Draft INITIAL STUDY REPORT TRANSPORTATION RESOURCES STUDY (15.7) Abbreviation Definition NEPA National Environmental Policy Act OCSP Open Cell Sheet Pile O&M operations and maintenance PIEP Port Intermodal Expansion Project POA Port of Anchorage Project Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project No. 14241 PTC Positive Train Control RR Railroad milepost RS Revised Statute RSP Revised Study Plan RV Recreational vehicle SPD study plan determination STIP Statewide Improvement Program Recreation Resources, River Recreation Flow and Access, and Subsistence Resources Studies Studies TDM travel demand model TIP Transportation Improvement Program TSAIA Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Alaska Energy Authority FERC Project No. 14241 Page v February 2014 Draft INITIAL STUDY REPORT TRANSPORTATION RESOURCES STUDY (15.7) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Transportation Resources Study 15.7 Purpose The objective of the transportation study is to document existing transportation facilities, including their condition and level of use, and to identify potential Project-related impacts on the transportation system. Status Two of the three major study components identified below are complete. Existing conditions have been documented; an asset inventory is complete. Future conditions have been forecasted for each mode, without the effects of Project-related impacts. Evaluating Project-related impacts to the transportation system will be completed during the next study season. Study The study is comprised of three major components. The first component is an Components analysis of existing conditions for the transportation system, including road, aviation, rail, port, and river travel. The second component is the forecasting of future transportation system conditions without the construction of the Project. The third component is an evaluation of Project-related activities on the future transportation system. 2013 Variances The ports of Seward and Whittier were added to the study area, as were the associated rail lines. This is a variance from RSP Section 15.7.3. Bridge data integration was limited to bridges whose current structural or functional condition is determined to have a potential
Recommended publications
  • Breakwater Inn 1 Juneau, Alaska Presented By
    BREAKWATER INN 1 JUNEAU, ALASKA PRESENTED BY 2 NON - ENDORSEMENT AND DISCLAIMER NOTICE Non-Endorsements Marcus & Millichap is not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by any commercial tenant or lessee identified in this marketing package. The presence of any corporation's logo or name is not intended to indicate or imply affiliation with, or sponsorship or endorsement by, said corporation of Marcus & Millichap, its affiliates or subsidiaries, or any agent, product, service, or commercial listing of Marcus & Millichap, and is solely included for the purpose of providing tenant lessee information about this listing to prospective customers. ALL PROPERTY SHOWINGS ARE BY APPOINTMENT ONLY. PLEASE CONSULT YOUR MARCUS & MILLICHAP AGENT FOR MORE DETAILS. Disclaimer THIS IS A BROKER PRICE OPINION OR COMPARATIVE MARKET ANALYSIS OF VALUE AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED AN APPRAISAL. This information has been secured from sources we believe to be reliable, but we make no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy of the information. References to square footage or age are approximate. Buyer must verify the information and bears all risk for any inaccuracies. Marcus & Millichap is a service mark of Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services, Inc. © 2018 Marcus & Millichap. All rights reserved. BREAKWATER INN AT JUNEAU, ALASKA Juneau, AK ACT ID ZAA0140246 3 BREAKWATER INN AT JUNEAU, ALASKA PROPERTY OVERVIEW PROPERTY OVERVIEW Marcus & Millichap exclusively presents for sale the Breakwater Inn in Juneau, Alaska. A three-story 49 room full service hotel sits on a open harbor water view less than a mile from Juneau Downtown and one and a half miles from the Juneau Cruise Ship Terminal.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard 62.2-2010 Addendum N
    ANSI/ASHRAE Addendum n to ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62.2-2010 Ventilation and Acceptable Indoor Air Quality in Low-Rise Residential Buildings Approved by the ASHRAE Standards Committee on January 21, 2012; by the ASHRAE Board of Directors on January 25, 2012; and by the American National Standards Institute on January 26, 2012. This addendum was approved by a Standing Standard Project Committee (SSPC) for which the Standards Committee has estab- lished a documented program for regular publication of addenda or revisions, including procedures for timely, documented, con- sensus action on requests for change to any part of the standard. The change submittal form, instructions, and deadlines may be obtained in electronic form from the ASHRAE Web site (www.ashrae.org) or in paper form from the Manager of Standards. The latest edition of an ASHRAE Standard may be purchased on the ASHRAE Web site (www.ashrae.org) or from ASHRAE Customer Service, 1791 Tullie Circle, NE, Atlanta, GA 30329-2305. E-mail: [email protected]. Fax: 404-321-5478. Telephone: 404-636-8400 (worldwide), or toll free 1-800-527-4723 (for orders in US and Canada). For reprint permission, go to www.ashrae.org/permissions. © 2012 ASHRAE ISSN 1041-2336 © ASHRAE (www.ashrae.org). For personal use only. Additional reproduction, distribution, or transmission in either print or digital form is not permitted without ASHRAE's prior written permission. ASHRAE Standing Standard Project Committee 62.2 Cognizant TC: TC 4.3, Ventilation Requirements and Infiltration SPLS Liaison: Robert G. Baker Steven J. Emmerich, Chair* Thomas P. Heidel Armin Rudd Don T.
    [Show full text]
  • Haines Highway Byway Corridor Partnership Plan
    HAINES HIGHWAY CORRIDOR PARTNERSHIP PLAN 1 Prepared For: The Haines Borough, as well as the village of Klukwan, and the many agencies, organizations, businesses, and citizens served by the Haines Highway. This document was prepared for local byway planning purposes and as part of the submission materials required for the National Scenic Byway designation under the National Scenic Byway Program of the Federal Highway Administration. Prepared By: Jensen Yorba Lott, Inc. Juneau, Alaska August 2007 With: Whiteman Consulting, Ltd Boulder, Colorado Cover: Haines, Alaska and the snow peaked Takhinska Mountains that rise over 6,000’ above the community 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION..............................................................5-9 2. BACKGROUND ON Byways....................................11-14 3. INSTRINSIC QUALITY REVIEW..............................15-27 4. ROAD & TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM...................29-45 5. ToURISM & Byway VISITATION...........................47-57 6. INTERPRETATION......................................................59-67 7. PURPOSE, VISION, GOALS & OBJECTIVES.......69-101 8. APPENDIX..................................................................103-105 3 4 INTRODUCTION 1 Chilkat River Valley “Valley of the Eagles” 5 The Haines Highway runs from the community byway. Obtaining national designation for the of Haines, Alaska to the Canadian-U.S. border American portion of the Haines highway should station at Dalton Cache, Alaska. At the half way be seen as the first step in the development of an point the highway passes the Indian Village of international byway. Despite the lack of a byway Klukwan. The total highway distance within Alaska program in Canada this should not prevent the is approximately 44 miles, however the Haines celebration and marketing of the entire Haines Highway continues another 106 miles through Highway as an international byway.
    [Show full text]
  • Chugiak-Eagle River Comprehensive Plan Update
    Chugiak-Eagle River Comprehensive Plan Update December 2006 Planning Department Municipality of Anchorage CHUGIAK-EAGLE RIVER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE Adopted December 12, 2006 Assembly Ordinance 2006-93(S-1) Prepared by the Physical Planning Division Planning Department Municipality of Anchorage Mark Begich, Mayor C HUGIAK-EAGLE R IVER C OMPREHENSIVE P LAN U PDATE -ii- MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE Assembly Dan Sullivan, Chair Debbie Ossiander, Vice-Chair Paul Bauer Janice Shamberg Chris Birch Ken Stout Dan Coffey Allan Tesche Anna Fairclough Dick Traini Pamela Jennings Planning and Zoning Commission Toni Jones, Chair Art Isham, Vice-Chair Lamar Cotten Nancy Pease Jim Fredrick Bruce Phelps Andrew Josephson Thomas Vincent Wang Jim Palmer Planning Department Tom Nelson, Director Physical Planning Division Cathy Hammond, Supervisor Tom Davis Van Le Susan Perry Parks and Recreation Department Eagle River John Rodda Information Technology Department GIS Services Lisa Ameen Jeff Anderson C HUGIAK-EAGLE R IVER C OMPREHENSIVE P LAN U PDATE -iii- Chugiak-Eagle River Comprehensive Plan Update Citizens’ Advisory Committee Jim Arnesen, Eklutna, Inc. Andy Brewer, South Fork Community Council Susan Browne, Eagle River Valley Community Council Michael Curry, Eklutna, Inc. Gail Dial, Chugiak, Birchwood, Eagle River Rural Road Service Area Judith Fetherolf, Eagle River Community Council Bob Gill, South Fork Community Council Susan Gorski, Chugiak-Eagle River Chamber of Commerce Bobbie Gossweiler, Eagle River Community Council Lexi Hill, Chugiak-Eagle River Parks & Recreation Board of Supervisors Charlie Horsman, Eagle River Community Council Val Jokela, Birchwood Community Council Ted Kinney, Chugiak Community Council Linda Kovac, Chugiak Community Council Diane Payne, Birchwood Community Council Tim Potter, Eklutna, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Area Management Report for the Sport Fisheries of Northern Cook Inlet, 2017–2018
    Fishery Management Report No. 20-04 Area Management Report for the Sport Fisheries of Northern Cook Inlet, 2017–2018 by Samantha Oslund Sam Ivey and Daryl Lescanec January 2020 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Divisions of Sport Fish and Commercial Fisheries Symbols and Abbreviations The following symbols and abbreviations, and others approved for the Système International d'Unités (SI), are used without definition in the following reports by the Divisions of Sport Fish and of Commercial Fisheries: Fishery Manuscripts, Fishery Data Series Reports, Fishery Management Reports, and Special Publications. All others, including deviations from definitions listed below, are noted in the text at first mention, as well as in the titles or footnotes of tables, and in figure or figure captions. Weights and measures (metric) General Mathematics, statistics centimeter cm Alaska Administrative all standard mathematical deciliter dL Code AAC signs, symbols and gram g all commonly accepted abbreviations hectare ha abbreviations e.g., Mr., Mrs., alternate hypothesis HA kilogram kg AM, PM, etc. base of natural logarithm e kilometer km all commonly accepted catch per unit effort CPUE liter L professional titles e.g., Dr., Ph.D., coefficient of variation CV meter m R.N., etc. common test statistics (F, t, χ2, etc.) milliliter mL at @ confidence interval CI millimeter mm compass directions: correlation coefficient east E (multiple) R Weights and measures (English) north N correlation coefficient cubic feet per second ft3/s south S (simple) r foot ft west W covariance cov gallon gal copyright degree (angular) ° inch in corporate suffixes: degrees of freedom df mile mi Company Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Appendices
    LAKE HOOD SEAPLANE BASE MASTER PLAN UPDATE Report Appendices September 2017 DOWL in conjunction with : RS&H, Southeast Strategies, and Solstice Advertising APPENDIX A Historical Photos of LHD THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK APPENDIX B Initial Survey Report THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK LAKE HOOD SEAPLANE BASE MASTER PLAN UPDATE User Survey Results April 2015 DOWL in conjunction with : RS&H, Southeast Strategies, and Solstice Advertising LAKE HOOD MASTER PLAN USER SURVEY RESULTS ANCHORAGE, ALASKA Prepared for: State of Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport P.O. Box 196960 Anchorage, Alaska 99519 Prepared by: DOWL 4041 B Street Anchorage, Alaska 99503 (907) 562-2000 AKSAS Number: 57737 April 2015 Lake Hood Master Plan Anchorage, Alaska User Survey Report April 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE ...............................................................................................1 WHO RESPONDED TO THE SURVEY .......................................................................................3 WHY DO YOU OPERATE FROM LHD .......................................................................................6 AIRCRAFT TYPES OPERATING OR POTENTIALLY OPERATING AT LHD .......................8 CAN/SHOULD LHD GROW .........................................................................................................9 INTEREST IN LEASING AND DEVELOPING AT LHD ..........................................................10 TYPE
    [Show full text]
  • Offering Overview
    GLACIER VILLAGE 9107 Mendenhall Mall Road Grocery anchored J U N E A U , A L A S K A Community Shopping Center $15,250,000 / 7.14% Cap in Southeast Alaska 100% Leased Grocery-anchored investment opportunity Multi-tenant community destination 27.23 acres / 1,186,138 square feet Offering Overview Address: 9107 Mendenhall Mall Road Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) is pleased to exclusively offer for sale Glacier Size: 242,797 square feet Village (the ”Property” or the “Offering”) located in picturesque Juneau, Alaska. The property is situated on a strong commercial intersection in Year Built: 1972 - 1991 one of Juneau’s neighborhood retail destinations. Built between 1972- 1991, this Super Bear (IGA) grocery-anchored center is a dominant Occupancy: 100% shopping center serving the trade area since construction. The property # of Tenants: 4 Fee Simple & 12 Ground Lease boasts excellent frontage along Egan Expressway, a four lane, asphalt surfaced roadway maintained by the State of Alaska, which runs to Site Area: 27.23 acres / 1,186,138 square feet the east toward the Juneau International Airport and into Downtown Juneau. With occupancy of 100%, Glacier Village offers a good mix of retail choices which serves a large customer base. Since construction, the property has been well maintained and continues to be one of the primary retail centers. This offering is situated on approximately 27.23 acres with premium frontage and 4 access points. The center features a tenant lineup including Super Bear Grocery, Sears, Napa Auto Parts, Papa Murphy’s, and Nugget Alaskan Outfitters. investment highlights central location Egan Drive (Alaska Route 7) and Menden Hall Loop are two of the major thoroughfares servicing the entire Juneau trade area with daily r traffic counts of over 25,000 vehicles e GLACIER VILLAGE v 11,193 VPD i R per day.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Energy Asset Score Program Overview and Technical Protocol
    PNNL-22045 Rev. 1.2 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 Building Energy Asset Score Program Overview and Technical Protocol (Version 1.2) N Wang S Goel V Srivastava A Makhmalbaf September 2015 PNNL-22045 Rev. 1.2 Building Energy Asset Score Program Overview and Technical Protocol (Version 1.2) N Wang S Goel V Srivastava A Makhmalbaf September 2015 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, Washington 99352 Summary The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is developing a voluntary national scoring system for commercial and multi-family residential buildings to help building owners and managers assess a building’s energy-related systems independent of operations. The goal of the score is to encourage cost- effective investment in energy efficiency improvements for these types of buildings. The system, known as the Building Energy Asset Score, will allow building owners and managers to compare their building infrastructure against peers and track energy efficiency impacts of building upgrades over time. The system will also help other building stakeholders (e.g., building investors, tenants, financiers, and appraisers) understand the relative efficiency of different buildings in a way that is independent from operations and occupancy. Prior to developing the Asset Score, DOE performed a market study1 to ensure that the effort would help address market needs and fill identified gaps. In 2012, DOE began initial pilot testing of the Asset Score. In 2013, DOE continued to assess the Asset Score through additional pilot testing and a variety of technical evaluations and performance analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Advisory Commission
    City of Wasilla 290 E Herning Avenue, Wasilla, Alaska Commissioners Commissioners Noel Lowe Wasilla Airport Advisory Raymond Block Charles Morris Commission Adam Paulick, Chair John Popecki, Vice Chair Cameron Sharick Regular Meeting Agenda Michael Lucas www.cityofwasilla.com Meeting Date 907-373-9010 Location October 25, 2018 Council Chambers 6:00 p.m. Wasilla City Hall 290 E Herning Avenue Page 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Regular Meeting Minutes: April 19, 2018 3 - 5 6. STAFF REPORTS 7. PUBLIC COMMENTS (THREE MINUTES PER PERSON) 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 9. NEW BUSINESS Wasilla Municipal Airport Construct Apron E Phase 1 10. PUBLIC COMMENTS (THREE MINUTES PER PERSON) 11. STAFF AND COMMISSION COMMENTS 12. ADJOURNMENT Airport Advisory Commission Meeting Packet - 10/25/18 Page 1 of 5 Page 2 of 5 WASILLA AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES APRIL 19, 2018 COMMISSIONERS Noel Lowe PRESENT: John Popecki Raymond Block Adam Paulick Cameron Sharick Michael Lucas in at 6:05 PM COMMISSIONERS Charles Morris ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Archie Giddings, Public Works Director Jolene Cooper, Finance Clerk II Ashley Loyer, Commission Secretary 1. CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Airport Advisory Commission was called to order at 6:00 p.m. on April 19, 2018, in Council Chambers of City Hall, Wasilla, Alaska by Chair Paulick. 2. ROLL CALL Upon roll call, a quorum of the Wasilla Airport Advisory Commission was established. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Paulick led the Pledge of Allegiance. 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved as presented without objection by unanimous consent.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 7 5/20/2015
    Page 1 of 7 Average wind speeds are based on the hourly data from 1996-2006 from automated stations at reporting airports (ASOS) unless otherwise noted. Click on a State: Arizona , California , Colorado , Hawaii , Idaho , Montana , Nevada , New Mexico , Oregon , Utah , Washington , Wyoming ALASKA AVERAGE WIND SPEED - MPH STATION | ID | Years | Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec | Ann AMBLER AIRPORT AWOS |PAFM|1996-2006| 6.7 8.5 7.9 7.7 6.7 5.3 4.8 5.1 6.1 6.8 6.6 6.4 | 6.5 ANAKTUVUK PASS AWOS |PAKP|1996-2006| 8.9 9.0 9.1 8.6 8.6 8.5 8.1 8.5 7.6 8.2 9.3 9.1 | 8.6 ANCHORAGE INTL AP ASOS |PANC|1996-2006| 6.7 6.0 7.5 7.7 8.7 8.2 7.8 6.8 7.1 6.6 6.1 6.1 | 7.1 ANCHORAGE-ELMENDORF AFB |PAED|1996-2006| 7.3 6.9 8.1 7.6 7.8 7.2 6.8 6.4 6.5 6.7 6.5 7.2 | 7.1 ANCHORAGE-LAKE HOOD SEA |PALH|1996-2006| 4.9 4.2 5.8 5.7 6.6 6.3 5.8 4.8 5.3 5.2 4.7 4.4 | 5.3 ANCHORAGE-MERRILL FLD |PAMR|1996-2006| 3.2 3.1 4.4 4.7 5.5 5.2 4.8 4.0 3.9 3.8 3.1 2.9 | 4.0 ANIAK AIRPORT AWOS |PANI|1996-2006| 4.9 6.6 6.5 6.4 5.6 4.5 4.2 4.0 4.6 5.5 5.5 4.1 | 5.1 ANNETTE AIRPORT ASOS |PANT|1996-2006| 9.2 8.2 8.9 7.8 7.4 7.0 6.2 6.4 7.2 8.3 8.6 9.8 | 8.0 ANVIK AIRPORT AWOS |PANV|1996-2006| 7.6 7.3 6.9 5.9 5.0 3.9 4.0 4.4 4.7 5.2 5.9 6.3 | 5.5 ARCTIC VILLAGE AP AWOS |PARC|1996-2006| 2.8 2.8 4.2 4.9 5.8 7.0 6.9 6.7 5.2 4.0 2.7 3.3 | 4.6 ATKA AIRPORT AWOS |PAAK|2000-2006| 15.1 15.1 13.1 15.0 13.4 12.4 11.9 10.7 13.5 14.5 14.7 14.4 | 13.7 BARROW AIRPORT ASOS |PABR|1996-2006| 12.2 13.1 12.4 12.1 12.4 11.5 12.6 12.5 12.6 14.0 13.7 13.1 | 12.7 BARTER ISLAND AIRPORT |PABA|1996-2006|
    [Show full text]
  • Public-Data File 88-21 GROUND-WATER-QUALITY
    Public-data File 88-21 GROUND-WATER-QUALITY MONITORING NETWORKS IN ALASKA 1 Danita L. Maynard Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys July 1988 THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED FOR TECHNICAL CONTENT (EXCEPT AS NOTED IN TEXT) OR FOR CONFORMITY TO THE EDITORIAL STANDARDS OF DGGS. 794 University Avenue, Suite 200 Fairbanks, Alaska 99709-3645 'DGGS, 18225 Fish Hatchery Road, P.O. Box 772116, Eagle River, Alaska 99577. Table of Contents PAGE Introduction............................. 1 Northern Region Ambient Trend ~onitorik~ U.S. Geological Survey .................... 2 Site Monitoring U.S.DepartmentofDefense .................. 2 Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation........ 3 Alaska Department o'f Natural Resources ............ 6 University of Alaska ..................... 6 Public Water System (PWS) Monitoring Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation ........ 7 Alaska Department of Fish and Game .............. 16 Southcentral Region Ambient Trend Monitoring Alaska Department of Natural Resources ............ 18 Municipality of Anchorage .................. 18 Site Monitoring U.S. Department of Defense .................. 19 Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation ........ 20 Public Water System (PWS) ~onitoring Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation ........ 41 Alaska Department of Fish and Game .............. 64 Southeast Region Public Water System (PWS) Monitoring Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation ........ 66 CURRENT AND RECENT GROUND-WATER QUALITY MONITORING NETWORKS IN ALASKA INTRODUCTION This report contains data supplemental to Maynard (1988), an evaluation of ground-water quality monitoring in Alaska. Ground-water quality monitoring is necessary to assess trends in ground-water quality, detect or assess ground-water contamination, assess remediation efforts, and assure potability of public-water systems (PWS) using ground-water supplies. The monitoring networks included here are administered by federal, state, or local agencies within Alaska.
    [Show full text]
  • E. Transportation and Public Transit West Anchorage District Plan
    E. Transportation and Public Transit West Anchorage District Plan TRANSPORTATION The West Anchorage transportation system is comprised of surface road, railroad, aviation, public transit, and nonmotorized (pedestrian, bicycle, and trail) facilities. Other components of Anchorage’s transportation system include freight distribution, regional connections, and congestion management (MOA, 2005). Inter-Bowl travel is dominated by personal vehicles on the surface road network, but this chapter will discuss the current state of all elements of West Anchorage’s transportation system and its associated facilities. Relationship to Other Transportation Plans Anchorage Metropolitan Area Transportation Solutions (AMATS) is the federally designated metropolitan planning organization responsible for transportation planning in the entire Municipality. The Anchorage Bowl 2025 Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) with 2027 Revisions (MOA, 2005) was developed through the AMATS planning process and is used to identify current and future system deficiencies that need improvement to meet MOA future traffic needs. It is subject to annual review and possible revision. The LRTP meets the federal long-range transportation planning requirements the MOA needs to apply for federal transportation funding. The Official Streets and Highways Plan (OSHP) identifies (by ordinance) the locations, classifications, and minimum right-of-way requirements of the street and highway system needed to meet LRTP goals over a 25 year planning period. LRTP recommended system improvements are funded through the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (Federal), Alaska Transportation Fund (Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities [ADOT&PF]), and Capital Improvements Program (MOA). This chapter will describe each mode of transportation as it relates to West Anchorage and how that would have an impact on land use planning.
    [Show full text]