Negotiation of Tax Treaties

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Negotiation of Tax Treaties Papers on Selected Topics in Papers on Selected Topics Papers on Selected Topics in Negotiation of Negotiation of Tax Treaties Negotiation Treaties of Tax Tax Treaties for Developing Countries for Developing Countries Papers on Selected Topics in Negotiation of Tax Treaties for Developing Countries asdf United Nations New York, 2014 Preface Tax treaties play a key role in the context of international cooperation in tax matters. On the one hand, they serve to encourage international investment and, consequently, global economic growth, by reducing or eliminating double taxation over cross-border income. On the other hand, they seek to enhance cooperation among tax administrations, especially in tackling international tax evasion. Developing countries, in particular the least developed ones, often lack the adequate skills and experience to efficiently interpret and negotiate tax treaties. This may result in difficult, time-consuming and, in worst-case scenarios, unsuccessful negotiation of tax treaties, which may not adequately address policy priorities of developing countries. Moreover, their capacity to be effective treaty partners may be jeopardized, especially as it relates to cooperation in combating international tax evasion. The importance of raising tax revenues for development, includ- ing through international tax cooperation, features prominently in the ongoing intergovernmental discussions on a new financing strategy, in support of the post-2015 development agenda, with poverty eradication and sustainable development at its core. The United Nations General Assembly, in its resolution 68/204 of 20 December 2013 on Financing for Development, recalled the ongoing commitment of Member States to enhance and strengthen domestic resource mobilization and fiscal space, including, where appropriate, through modernized tax systems, more efficient tax collection, the broadening of the tax base and the effective combating of tax evasion and capital flight. While each coun- try is responsible for its tax system, it is important to support national efforts in these areas by strengthening technical assistance and enhancing international cooperation and participation in addressing international tax matters. There is a clear need for capacity-building initiatives, which would strengthen the skills of the relevant officials in developing coun- tries in the tax treaty area, as a contribution to further enhancing their iii Preface role in support of the global efforts aimed at improving the investment climate and effectively curbing international tax evasion. We hope that this collection of papers will contribute to fulfilling that need. The papers were written by experienced treaty negotiators, in consultation with numerous experts from the national tax authorities and minis- tries of finance of developing countries. An effort was made to keep the material basic and practical. We hope that it will serve a useful purpose in providing practical guidance to tax treaty negotiators from developing countries to advance their countries’ double tax treaty practices. Alexander Trepelkov Director, Financing for Development Office Department of Economic and Social Affairs iv Acknowledgements We would like to express our appreciation and thanks to all the people and organizations involved in producing this collection of papers on negotiations of tax treaties. Most of all, we wish to thank the authors of the papers, namely: Ms. Ariane Pickering, Former Chief Tax Treaty Negotiator, Australian Tax Office and Treasury, Australia; and Mr. Odd Hengsle, Former Director-General, Tax Treaties and International Tax Affairs, Ministry of Finance, Norway, for delivering such a valuable product that keeps in mind the needs of less-experienced treaty negotiators. We also wish to acknowledge the contribution of experts from the National Tax Authorities and Ministries of Finance of develop- ing countries who contributed their views and provided inputs to the draft chapters, namely: Mr. Ulvi Yusifov (Azerbaijan), Mr. Syed Mohammad Abu Daud (Bangladesh), Ms. Sabina Theresa Walcott- Denny (Barbados), Ms. Pen Sopakphea (Cambodia), Mr. Adrien Terence Tocke (Cameroon), Ms. Natalia Aristizábal (Colombia), Mr. Mario Ricardo Osorio Hernandez (Colombia), Ms. Ana Yesenia Rodríguez (Costa Rica), Ms. Evelyn Maria Molina (Costa Rica), Mr. Edgar Octavio Morales (Dominican Republic), Mr. Galo Antonio Maldonado (Ecuador), Mr. Mamdouh Sayed Omar (Egypt), Mr. Hesham Ismail Abdelmonem Khodair (Egypt), Mr. Ruslan Akhalaia (Georgia), Ms. Marine Khurtsidze (Georgia), Mr. Samuel McLord Chekpeche (Ghana), Mr. Eric NII Yarboi Mensah (Ghana), Mr. Gunawan Pribadi (Indonesia), Ms. Nurgul Akshabayeva (Kazakhstan), Mr. Saythong Ouiphilavong (Lao People’s Democratic Republic), Mr. Pusetso Seth Macheli (Lesotho), Mr. Setsoto Ranthocha (Lesotho), Mr. Crispin Clemence Kulemeka (Malawi), Ms. Laila Benchekroun (Morocco), Ms. Najia Bargui (Morocco), Ms. Mya Mya Oo (Myanmar), Ms. Naydine Sharida du Preez (Namibia), Mr. Tanka Mani Sharma (Nepal), Mr. Adesoji Bodunde Omoyele (Nigeria), Ms. Laura Cristina Barrios Altafulla (Panama), Ms. Leka Nama Nablu (Papua New v Acknowledgements Guinea), Ms. Irving Ojeda Alvarez (Peru), Ms. Kim S. Jacinto-Henares (Philippines), Ms. Anastasia Certan (Republic of Moldova), Mr. Kayigi Habiyambere Aimable (Rwanda), Mr. Baye Moussa Ndoye (Senegal), Ms. Phensuk Sangasubana (Thailand), Ms. Patience Emily Rubagumya (Uganda), Ms. Tetiana Skupova (Ukraine), Ms. Mwantumu Mshirazi Salim (United Republic of Tanzania), Mr. Alvaro Romano (Uruguay), Ms. Tran Thi Phuong Nhung (Viet Nam), Mr. Berlin Msiska (Zambia) and Mr. Max Mugari (Zimbabwe). We also acknowledge with gratitude the important role of cur- rent and former members of the United Nations Committee of Experts on International Cooperation in Tax Matters, namely: Ms. Lise-Lott Kana (Chile), Mr. Wolfgang Lasars (Germany), Mr. Enrico Martino (Italy), Mr. Mansor Hassan (Malaysia), Mr. Armando Lara Yaffar (Mexico), Mr. Stig Sollund (Norway) and Mr. Ronald van der Merwe (South Africa), who contributed their expertise to this project on a pro bono basis. We are also grateful to the heads and representatives of the international and regional organizations who supported this project, including: Mr. Logan Wort, Mr. Lincoln Marais and Ms. Elizabeth Storbeck of the African Tax Administration Forum (ATAF); Mr. Márcio Verdi, Mr. Socorro Velazquez and Mr. Miguel Pecho of the Inter-American Center of Tax Administrations (CIAT); Mr. Robert Maate of the East African Community (EAC); and Mr. Paolo Ciocca of the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). In par- ticular, we would like to thank Mr. Pascal Saint-Amans, Ms. Marlies de Ruiter, Mr. Jacques Sasseville and Mr. David Partington of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) for sharing their invaluable expertise and resources. We would like to thank the German Federal Ministry for Economic Development and Cooperation (BMZ) for its financial support for the technical meetings, at which these papers were dis- cussed and revised. We would also like to thank our partner, the International Tax Compact (ITC) for their financial and techni- cal support throughout the project and for facilitating the contacts with the experts within the national tax authorities and ministries of finance of developing countries. vi Acknowledgements Last but not least, we also wish to acknowledge the valuable assis- tance of other staff in the Financing for Development Office, namely: Mr. Michael Lennard, Ms. Irving Ojeda Alvarez, Ms. Leah McDavid, Ms. Victoria Panghulan and Ms. Mary Nolan, who provided support within their respective roles. Alex Trepelkov, Harry Tonino and Dominika Halka 27 March 2014 vii Introduction At its eighth session (Geneva, 15–19 October 2012), the Committee of Experts on International Cooperation in Tax Matters (the Committee) requested the secretariat “to seek additional resources to advance the work to strengthen the capacity of developing countries to negotiate tax treaties.” Accordingly, the Financing for Development Office (FfDO) organized an expert group meeting on “Tax Treaty Negotiation and Capacity Development” (New York, 13-14 December 2012) with the participation of several members of the Committee, as well as current and former tax treaty negotiators representing both developed and developing countries. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss and identify the most suitable strategies and modalities for the develop- ment and implementation of tools aimed at strengthening the skills of national tax authorities in developing countries in the area of double tax treaty negotiation. The experts shared their experiences in this area, with a focus on the needs of developing countries at different levels of development and with diverse macroeconomic conditions and goals. They also ana- lysed the existing knowledge on the subject, as well as available mate- rials and capacity development tools, including those developed by the Committee. They then determined how and to what extent these resources could be effectively used and/or needed to be improved or complemented for the purposes of delivering capacity-development initiatives in the above area. They also put forward proposals on con- tent and implementation of such activities. One of the proposals was to develop a number of practical papers on selected issues in the negotiation of tax treaties and offer them to developing countries free of charge. The experts identified tentative topics
Recommended publications
  • Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science
    Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science Volume 318 Series editors Alisa Bokulich, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA Robert S. Cohen, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA Jürgen Renn, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin, Germany Kostas Gavroglu, University of Athens, Athens, Greece Managing Editor Lindy Divarci, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science Editorial Board Theodore Arabatzis, University of Athens Heather E. Douglas, University of Waterloo Jean Gayon, Université Paris 1 Thomas F. Glick, Boston University Hubert Goenner, University of Goettingen John Heilbron, University of California, Berkeley Diana Kormos-Buchwald, California Institute of Technology Christoph Lehner, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science Peter Mclaughlin, Universität Heidelberg Agustí Nieto-Galan, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Nuccio Ordine, Universitá della Calabria Ana Simões, Universidade de Lisboa John J. Stachel, Boston University Sylvan S. Schweber, Harvard University Baichun Zhang, Chinese Academy of Science The series Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science was conceived in the broadest framework of interdisciplinary and international concerns. Natural scientists, mathematicians, social scientists and philosophers have contributed to the series, as have historians and sociologists of science, linguists, psychologists, physicians, and literary critics. The series has been able to include works by authors from many other countries around the world. The editors believe that the history and philosophy of science should itself be scientific, self-consciously critical, humane as well as rational, sceptical and undogmatic while also receptive to discussion of first principles. One of the aims of Boston Studies, therefore, is to develop collaboration among scientists, historians and philosophers.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Economic and Social Council on Its 2017 Session
    General Assembly A/72/3 Official Records Seventy-second Session Supplement No. 3 Report of the Economic and Social Council on its 2017 session (New York, 28 July 2016-27 July 2017) United Nations New York, 2017 Note Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. ISSN 0082-8203 [17 August 2017] Contents Chapter Page I. Matters calling for action by or brought to the attention of the General Assembly .......... 6 II. Special meetings of the Economic and Social Council at the seventy-first session of the General Assembly .............................................................. 33 III. Special meeting of the Economic and Social Council on international cooperation in tax matters ....................................................................... 36 IV. Multi-stakeholder forum on science, technology and innovation for the Sustainable Development Goals ............................................................. 40 V. Economic and Social Council forum on financing for development follow-up ............. 41 VI. High-level segment ............................................................. 43 A. Ministerial meeting of the high-level political forum on sustainable development convened under the auspices of the Economic and Social Council ................... 45 B. High-level policy dialogue with international financial and trade institutions .......... 45 C. Thematic discussion .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Committee of Experts on International Cooperation in Tax Matters
    Economic and Social Council E/2015/45-E/C.18/2015/6 Official Records, 2015 Supplement No. 25 Committee of Experts on International Cooperation in Tax Matters Report on the eleventh session (19-23 October 2015) United Nations New York, 2015 Note Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. [29 December 2015] Contents Chapter Page I. Introduction ................................................................... 4 II. Organization of the session ....................................................... 6 III. Discussion and conclusions on substantive issues related to international cooperation in tax matters .................................................................... 7 A. Article 1 (Persons covered): application of treaty rules to hybrid entities ............. 7 B. Article 5 (Permanent establishment): the meaning of “connected projects” ............ 9 C. Article 8 (Shipping, inland waterways transport and air transport) ................... 10 D. Article 9 (Associated enterprises): issues for the next update of the United Nations Practical Manual on Transfer Pricing for Developing Countries ..................... 12 E. Article 12 (Royalties): the meaning of “industrial, commercial and scientific equipment”; and issues regarding software-related payments ....................... 13 F. Article 26 (Exchange of information): proposed code of conduct .................... 14 G. Taxation of technical services ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Notion of Tax and the Elimination of International Double Taxation Or Double Non-Taxation”
    IFA 2016 MADRID CONGRESS “The notion of tax and the elimination of international double taxation or double non-taxation” Luxembourg national report Branch reporters: Chiara Bardini*, Sandra Fernandes** Summary and conclusions The concept of tax under Luxembourg domestic law is based on the basic distinction between compulsory levies that qualify as taxes (“impôts”) and other compulsory levies, such as fees (“taxes”). In general, the term tax can be defined as a compulsory monetary levy imposed by public authorities on the taxpayers in order to mainly raise revenue for which nothing is received in return. In Luxembourg, taxes can only be raised by the Luxembourg State and the municipalities in accordance with the principles of legality, equality and annuality. The Luxembourg tax system relies on the basic distinction between direct and indirect taxes. The Luxembourg direct taxes are levied on items of income and of capital. The main Luxembourg income taxes are the individual income tax, the corporate income tax and the municipal business tax. The net wealth tax, the real estate tax and the subscription tax are the most important Luxembourg taxes levied on items of capital. The Luxembourg notion of “tax” is crucial for the purpose of granting the domestic unilateral foreign tax credit, of applying the domestic participation exemption regime. As a rule, a foreign levy only qualifies for the purpose of such domestic provisions provided that such foreign levy is an income tax and that its main features are comparable to the Luxembourg income tax (i.e. a national income tax imposed on a similar taxable base.
    [Show full text]
  • The Financial Secrecy Index: Shedding New Light on the Geography of Secrecy
    The Financial Secrecy Index: Shedding New Light on the Geography of Secrecy Alex Cobham, Petr Janský, and Markus Meinzer Abstract Both academic research and public policy debate around tax havens and offshore finance typically suffer from a lack of definitional consistency. Unsurprisingly then, there is little agreement about which jurisdictions ought to be considered as tax havens—or which policy measures would result in their not being so considered. In this article we explore and make operational an alternative concept, that of a secrecy jurisdiction and present the findings of the resulting Financial Secrecy Index (FSI). The FSI ranks countries and jurisdictions according to their contribution to opacity in global financial flows, revealing a quite different geography of financial secrecy from the image of small island tax havens that may still dominate popular perceptions and some of the literature on offshore finance. Some major (secrecy-supplying) economies now come into focus. Instead of a binary division between tax havens and others, the results show a secrecy spectrum, on which all jurisdictions can be situated, and that adjustment lfor the scale of business is necessary in order to compare impact propensity. This approach has the potential to support more precise and granular research findings and policy recommendations. JEL Codes: F36, F65 Working Paper 404 www.cgdev.org May 2015 The Financial Secrecy Index: Shedding New Light on the Geography of Secrecy Alex Cobham Tax Justice Network Petr Janský Institute of Economic Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University in Prague Markus Meinzer Tax Justice Network A version of this paper is published in Economic Geography (July 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • E/2009/INF/2/Add.1 Economic and Social Council
    United Nations E/2009/INF/2/Add.1 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 21 August 2009 Original: English Resolutions and decisions adopted by the Economic and Social Council at its substantive session of 2009 (Geneva, 6-31 July 2009) Note: The provisional texts of the resolutions and decisions adopted by the Council at its substantive session of 2009 are circulated herein for information. The final texts will be issued in Official Records of the Economic and Social Council, 2009, Supplement No. 1 (E/2009/99). 09-49043 (E) 061009 *0949043* E/2009/INF/2/Add.1 Contents Resolutions Resolution number Title Agenda item Date adopted Page 2009/1 Progress in the implementation of General Assembly 3 (a) 22 July 2009 12 resolution 62/208 on the triennial comprehensive policy review of operational activities for development of the United Nations system (E/2009/L.18 and E/2009/SR.32) 2009/2 Appointment of the Executive Director of the 3 (b) 22 July 2009 19 United Nations Population Fund (E/2009/L.19 and E/2009/SR.32) 2009/3 Strengthening of the coordination of emergency 5 22 July 2009 20 humanitarian assistance of the United Nations (E/2009/SR.32) 2009/4 Ad Hoc Advisory Group on Haiti (E/2009/L.13 and 7 (d) 23 July 2009 24 E/2009/SR.34) 2009/5 Recovering from the crisis: a Global Jobs Pact 6 (a) 24 July 2009 26 (E/2009/L.24 and E/2009/SR.35) 2009/6 Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS 7 (g) 24 July 2009 27 (UNAIDS) (E/2009/L.23 and E/2009/SR.36) 2009/7 Assessment of the progress made in the 13 (b) 24 July 2009 32 implementation of and follow-up to the outcomes of the World Summit on the Information Society (E/2009/31, chap.
    [Show full text]
  • Gc(09)/Inf/82
    International Atomic Energy Agency GC(IX)/INF/82 17 September 1965 General Conference GENERAL Distr. ENGLISH only Ninth Regular Session DELEGATIONS Information received by noon on 15 September 1965 CONTENTS Pages I. States A. Member States 3 B. Non-Member States 31 II, Organizations A. United Nations and specialized agencies 32 B. Intergovernmental organizations 33 C. Non-governmental organizations having 34 consultative status with the Agency ANNEX: Addresses I. States II. Organizations An asterisk following the name of a participant indicates that his wife is present in Tokyo, REQUESTS FOR CHANGES IN SUBSEQUENT EDITIONS OF THIS LIST SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO THE PROTOCOL OFFICE IN WRITING. 65-5760 GC(IX)/lHP/82 page 3 STATES A. LIMBER STATES AFGHANISTAN ALBANIA ALG^HTA ARGENTINA Delegates Rear-Admiral Oscar A. QUIHILLALT * Chairman, Atomic Energy Commission! Governor from Argentina on the Board of Governors £Lksraai&J Professor Mario E. BANCORA * Director, Atcciic Energy Commission! Alternate to the Governor Adviser? Mr. Carlos G. LOUGE Third Secretary, the Embassy in Japan AUSTRALIA Delegate; Sir Philip BAXTER, K.B.E<., C.M.G. Chairman, Atomic Energy Commission! Governor from Australia on the Board of Governors Alternates J- Mr. A.B. THOMAS Head, International Relations Section, Atomic Energy Commission GC(IX)/INF/82 page 4 Mr- Ro do FERCIVAL First Secretary, the Embassy in Japan Mr. P. F. PETERS * First Secretary? the Embassy in Japan Mr. G. Ao CHANDLER Executive Assistants International Relations Section, Atomic Energy Commission AUSTRIA Relegates H.E, Dr. Heinrich HAYMERLE Minister1 Plenipotentiary, Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs Alternates Mr. Richard POLACZEK Director, Federax Chancellery Advisers Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Plural Reference.Pdf
    OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – FIRST PROOF, 11/12/2015, SPi Plurality and Unity Dictionary: NOSD 0002624321.INDD 1 11/12/2015 3:07:20 PM OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – FIRST PROOF, 11/12/2015, SPi Dictionary: NOSD 0002624321.INDD 2 11/12/2015 3:07:20 PM OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – FIRST PROOF, 11/12/2015, SPi Plurality and Unity Logic, Philosophy, and Linguistics !"#$!" %& Massimiliano Carrara, Alexandra Arapinis, and Friederike Moltmann Dictionary: NOSD 0002624321.INDD 3 11/12/2015 3:07:20 PM OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – FIRST PROOF, 11/12/2015, SPi Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX' (DP, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © the several contributors ')*( +e moral rights of the authors have been asserted First Edition published in ')*( Impression: * All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press *,- Madison Avenue, New York, NY *))*(, United States of America British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Control Number: ')*.,//0/.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Financial Centres
    Helpdesk Report Mapping Financial Centres Hannah Timmis Institute of Development Studies 15 May 2018 Question What are the key financial centres that affect developing countries? Contents 1. Overview 2. IFCs and developing countries 3. Key IFCs 4. References The K4D helpdesk service provides brief summaries of current research, evidence, and lessons learned. Helpdesk reports are not rigorous or systematic reviews; they are intended to provide an introduction to the most important evidence related to a research question. They draw on a rapid desk- based review of published literature and consultation with subject specialists. Helpdesk reports are commissioned by the UK Department for International Development and other Government departments, but the views and opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of DFID, the UK Government, K4D or any other contributing organisation. For further information, please contact [email protected]. 1. Overview International financial centres (IFCs) are characterised by favourable tax regimes for foreign corporations. They are theorised to affect developing countries in three key ways. First, they divert real and financial flows away from developing countries. Second, they erode developing countries’ tax bases and thus public resources. Third, IFCs can affect developing countries’ own tax policies by motivating governments to engage in tax competition. The form and scale of these effects across different countries depend on complex interactions between their national tax policies and those of IFCs. In order to better understand the relationship between national tax regimes and development, in 2006, the IMF, OECD, UN and World Bank recommended to the G-20 that all members undertake “spillover analyses” to assess the impact of their tax policies on developing countries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Excise Tax Treaty for the Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf
    The Excise Tax Treaty for The Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf The Excise Tax Treaty for the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) The members of the Cooperation Council for the Arab Gulf States (GCC), namely: the United Arab Emirates, Kingdom of Bahrain, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Sultanate of Oman, State of Qatar, and State of Kuwait, Pursuant to the objectives set out in the Statute of the Gulf Cooperation Council aimed to further develop existing cooperation rela- tions amongst them in various fields; In line with the objectives of the GCC Economic Agreement of 2001, which seeks to reach advanced stages of economic integration, and develop similar economic and financial legislation and legal foundations amongst Member States, and with a desire to promote the GCC economy and proceed with the measures that have been taken to establish economic unity amongst member states; and Pursuant to the Supreme Council’s decision, during its 36th session (Riyadh 9-10 December, 2015), which empowers the Financial and Economic Cooperation Committee to complete all the requirements for the adoption of the GCC Excise Tax Treaty and ratify it; have agreed to the following: Chapter 1 General Provisions Article (1) Definitions In the implementation of the provisions of this Agreement, the following terms shall bear the meanings set forth against each of them, unless otherwise implied in the context: Council/GCC: Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf. Agreement: The GCC Excise Tax Treaty. Tax: The Excise Tax for the GCC. Member State: Any state with full membership in the Gulf Cooperation Council in accordance with the Council’s Statute.
    [Show full text]
  • Tax and Transparency Fact-Finding Mission
    Tax and transparency fact-finding mission Obstacles, solutions and windows of opportunity for progress towards financial transparency and tax justice By an independent delegation of experts from Asia, Africa and Latin America. Based on visits to Switzerland, France, Norway, United Nations, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, and the European Commission About this document About the Tax and Transparency Fact-finding Mission 2 This report is the outcome of a Tax and This mission was facilitated by the European Network on Debt and Transparency Fact-finding Mission carried Development (EURODAD) in cooperation with the African Forum out by a delegation of independent experts and Network on Debt and Development (AFRODAD) and the Latin from Asia, Africa and Latin America1 in American Network on Debt, Development and Rights (LATINDADD). October and November 2013. Based on The mission was funded by the Norwegian Agency for Development visits to Switzerland, France, Norway, Cooperation (Norad) under a project directed by AFRODAD. The United Nations, Organisation for Economic overall goals of the project are the following: Co-operation and Development, and the European Commission2. All views ● Strengthening the evidence base, deepening understanding presented in this report are those of of some of the main drivers and impacts of capital flight on the experts in their personal capacities developing countries, and addressing them through specific and reflect the group’s consensus on proposals on responsible financing standards;
    [Show full text]
  • Contents BEPS IMPLEMENTATION
    Contents BEPS IMPLEMENTATION ......................................................................................................................... 2 MAP Workshop ................................................................................................................................... 2 BEPS AND TRANSFER PRICING ................................................................................................................ 3 Transfer Pricing ................................................................................................................................... 3 Transfer Pricing Documentation and Country-by-Country Reporting ................................................ 4 Transfer Pricing and Customs Valuation ............................................................................................. 6 Transfer Pricing Risk Assessment ........................................................................................................ 7 Train the Trainers on International Taxation ...................................................................................... 8 OECD/IGF International Taxation and the Mining Industry ................................................................ 9 Advanced Transfer Pricing ................................................................................................................ 10 TOOLKITS ............................................................................................................................................... 11 Toolkit on Addressing Comparable
    [Show full text]