72Ce7753fad7d82b028a51615e

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

72Ce7753fad7d82b028a51615e Hindawi Journal of Environmental and Public Health Volume 2019, Article ID 5490716, 8 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5490716 Research Article Diarrhea Prevention Practice and Associated Factors among Caregivers of Under-Five Children in Enemay District, Northwest Ethiopia Melese Dubie Agegnehu,1 Liknaw Bewket Zeleke ,2 Yitayal Ayalew Goshu ,3 Yonas Lamore Ortibo,2 and Yohannes Mehretie Adinew 4 1World Vision, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 2College of Health Sciences, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia 3College of Health Sciences and Medicine, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia 4College of Health Sciences and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Ethiopia Correspondence should be addressed to Liknaw Bewket Zeleke; [email protected] Received 24 October 2018; Revised 2 February 2019; Accepted 11 February 2019; Published 12 May 2019 Academic Editor: Pauline E. Jolly Copyright © 2019 Melese Dubie Agegnehu et al. .is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Background. Diarrhea is the leading cause of mortality among infants and children younger than 5 years of age in both un- derdeveloped and developing countries. Factors determining the occurrence of diarrhea in children are complex, and the relative contribution of each factor varies as a function of interaction between socioeconomic, environmental, and behavioral variables. Objectives. To assess diarrhea prevention practice and associated factors of diarrheal disease among caregivers who have under- five children in Enemay district, Ethiopia, 2018. Methods. Community-based cross-sectional study was done from June 1–30, 2018, among 398 caregivers who have under-five children, in the Enemay district that were selected by using the simple random sampling technique. A structured and pretested data collection tool was used to collect the data. Data were entered using EPI DATA version 4.2, and analysis was done using SPSS version 20 statistical package to be cleaned and analyzed. Descriptive analysis was done to describe study participants, and logistic regression (bivariable and multivariable) analysis was done to identify factors that have association with the dependent variable. .e P value was less than 0.05. Results. A total of 398 with a response rate of 97% under-five caregivers were participated in this study. Nearly, half (48.7%) of the participants were in the age group 25–34. .e study revealed that good practice of diarrhea prevention was 52.8%. .is study was also identified that occupation (AOR: 3.922, 95% CI: 1.593, 9.657), family size (AOR: 0.088, 95% CI: 0.009, 0.916), and understanding on diarrhea (AOR: 0.237, 95% CI: 0.091, 0.613) were associated factors of diarrhea prevention practice of under-five children caregivers. Conclusion. .is finding showed that diarrhea prevention practice among under-five children caregivers was low and prevention practice was significantly as- sociated with caregivers’ awareness on frequency of diarrhea in a day, occupation, and family size in a house. 1. Background Diarrhea is the second leading cause of child morbidity and mortality, especially in the developing countries. Glob- Diarrhea is the passage of loose or watery stools occurring ally, it is estimated that there are 2.5 billion episodes and 1.5 three or more times in a 24-hour period which means an million deaths annually in children under five years [3]. increased frequency or decreased consistency of bowel Diarrheal diseases are major causes of malnutrition, movements, and it affects people of all ages [1]. It is usually delayed physical development, and early childhood mor- a symptom of an infection in the intestinal tract, which can tality in developing countries and poor communities, and be caused by a variety of bacterial, viral, and parasitic or- the major cause of death in children with diarrhea is loss of ganisms [2]. water and essential minerals [4]. 2 Journal of Environmental and Public Health In sub-Saharan Africa, primary caregivers display poor With confidence level 95% and margin of error 5%, 2 2 perception about the signs of dehydration, dysentery, and n � (Zα/2) p(1 − P)/d , where n is the sample size, P is the management of diarrhea [5]. population proportion of diarrhea prevalence, d is the .e incidence of illnesses contributing to avoidable deaths margin of error (0.05), and α is 5%. diarrhea is higher in Ethiopia compared to other sub-Saharan So using the above formula, the sample size is African countries partly due to different factors [6]. In n � z2p((1 − p)/d2) Ethiopia, diarrheal disease is a major public health problem, � ((1:96)2 × 0:413)((1 − 0:413)/(0:05)2) � 373. and it is one of the top 15 countries in which nearly three- .e final sample size with 10% nonresponse rate is 410. fourths of child deaths occur due to diarrhea [4]. In Ethiopia, morbidity reports and community-based studies indicate that 2.5. Sampling Technique. .e study was conducted using diarrheal diseases are a major public health problem that simple random sampling. Six kebeles were selected by lottery causes excess morbidity and mortality among children [7]. method from all 29 kebeles in the Enemay district. Finally, .e prevalence in Enemay woreda is 18.6% which indicates the required number of under-five caregivers was selected by diarrhea is still the burden in the study area [8]. using the simple random sampling technique from the list Various preventive techniques were reported in the obtained from health extension workers in selected kebeles. literatures including hygiene and sanitation, diet, medica- tions, and supplements which are generally classified as health care, breastfeeding, immunization, supplemental 2.6. Data Collection Procedure. Data were collected by in- zinc, and probiotics [9]. Treatment and prevention of di- terviewer-administered interview and observation using arrhea can be done at home by primary caregivers, and their semistructured questionnaire. .e questionnaire was pre- role is vital in health promotion, disease prevention, and pared in English initially by reviewing the literatures and patient care [4]. then translated in to the Amharic version which later on Prevention practice of caregivers is important and can translated back to the English version to check its consis- prevent diarrhea-related child morbidity and mortality. tency and comparability of the finding. Six health extension .erefore, the study aimed at identifying the gaps on under-five data collectors and one BSc nursing supervisor were children diarrhea prevention practice and associated factors in recruited to data collection in the Enemay district. Training the study area so as to forward recommendations for under- was given for data collectors and supervisor on objectives of five caregivers, local health-care providers, and other stake- the study, method of collecting the needed information holders to reduce diarrhea-related morbidity and mortality. through interviewing and observation, how to fill the in- .e community at large in the study area can be benefited from formation on the questionnaire, and the ethical aspect in improved under-five diarrhea prevention practice. approaching the participants which should be in a polite and respectful manner. .e supervisor had been monitoring the 2. Methods data collection process, and the investigators were available to respond the concerns raised from the data collector and 2.1. Study Design. Community-based cross-sectional study the supervisor. .e older children were considered when two was conducted. or more under-five children were found in the house. 2.2. Study Area and Period. .e study was conducted in 2.7. Operational Definition Enemay district, East Gojjam zone, Amhara regional state, 2.7.1. Good Diarrhea Prevention Practice. Participants who northwest Ethiopia, from June 1–30, 2018. .e Enemay scored above the mean value of practice question [11]. district is located 370 km, northwest of Addis Ababa, the capital city of Ethiopia, and 220 km southwest of Bahir Dar city, the capital of the Amhara National Regional State, re- 2.7.2. Clean Latrine. No fecal matter in and around the pit spectively. .e total population in the district is 198241, of latrine, properly swept. which 26404 are under-five children. .e district has one district hospital, 7 health centers, and 34 health postsites. All 2.7.3. Hand Washing at Critical Time. It includes washing these health facilities involve in diarrhea prevention and hand after using a toilet, after cleaning a child, after any control. Access to safe water supply in the district is 62% [10]. cleaning activity, before preparing food, before meal, and before breastfeeding. 2.3. Source Population. All caregivers of under-five children in the Enemay district were the source populations, and the 2.7.4. Caregiver. A caregiver is an individual who could be study population was all caregivers of under-five children in a parent, foster parent, or head of the household who attends the selected kebeles. to the needs of a child or primary caregiver [12]. 2.4. Sample Size Determination. Single population pro- 2.8. Data Quality Assurance. .e questionnaire was adapted portion formula was employed using population proportion from literatures and modified into local context. Training 41.3% [5]. was given for data collectors and supervisor. Pretesting of the Journal of Environmental and Public Health 3 questionnaire was made on 5% of the sample size in adjacent for caregivers about causes of diarrhea, and 70.1% respond kebele prior to the actual data collection. .e data collection contaminated food. Concerning treatment seeking behavior process was strictly followed day to day by the supervisor, of the participants, 37 (31.9%) participants stay at home and data were checked for its completeness by the principal without treatment when their child had diarrhea (Table 2). investigator. During analysis, not eligible variables for the analysis method were excluded by checking the chi-square 3.3.
Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia
    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
    [Show full text]
  • Midterm Survey Protocol
    Protocol for L10K Midterm Survey The Last 10 Kilometers Project JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia October 2010 Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 The Last Ten Kilometers Project ............................................................................................................ 3 Objective one activities cover all the L10K woredas: .......................................................................... 4 Activities for objectives two, three and four in selected woredas ...................................................... 5 The purpose of the midterm survey ....................................................................................................... 6 The midterm survey design ...................................................................................................................... 7 Annex 1: List of L10K woredas by region, implementation strategy, and implementing phase ......... 10 Annex 2: Maps.................................................................................................................................................. 11 Annex 3: Research questions with their corresponding study design ...................................................... 14 Annex 4: Baseline survey methodology ........................................................................................................ 15 Annex 5: L10K midterm survey
    [Show full text]
  • AMHARA REGION : Who Does What Where (3W) (As of 13 February 2013)
    AMHARA REGION : Who Does What Where (3W) (as of 13 February 2013) Tigray Tigray Interventions/Projects at Woreda Level Afar Amhara ERCS: Lay Gayint: Beneshangul Gumu / Dire Dawa Plan Int.: Addis Ababa Hareri Save the fk Save the Save the df d/k/ CARE:f k Save the Children:f Gambela Save the Oromia Children: Children:f Children: Somali FHI: Welthungerhilfe: SNNPR j j Children:l lf/k / Oxfam GB:af ACF: ACF: Save the Save the af/k af/k Save the df Save the Save the Tach Gayint: Children:f Children: Children:fj Children:l Children: l FHI:l/k MSF Holand:f/ ! kj CARE: k Save the Children:f ! FHI:lf/k Oxfam GB: a Tselemt Save the Childrenf: j Addi Dessie Zuria: WVE: Arekay dlfk Tsegede ! Beyeda Concern:î l/ Mirab ! Concern:/ Welthungerhilfe:k Save the Children: Armacho f/k Debark Save the Children:fj Kelela: Welthungerhilfe: ! / Tach Abergele CRS: ak Save the Children:fj ! Armacho ! FHI: Save the l/k Save thef Dabat Janamora Legambo: Children:dfkj Children: ! Plan Int.:d/ j WVE: Concern: GOAL: Save the Children: dlfk Sahla k/ a / f ! ! Save the ! Lay Metema North Ziquala Children:fkj Armacho Wegera ACF: Save the Children: Tenta: ! k f Gonder ! Wag WVE: Plan Int.: / Concern: Save the dlfk Himra d k/ a WVE: ! Children: f Sekota GOAL: dlf Save the Children: Concern: Save the / ! Save: f/k Chilga ! a/ j East Children:f West ! Belesa FHI:l Save the Children:/ /k ! Gonder Belesa Dehana ! CRS: Welthungerhilfe:/ Dembia Zuria ! î Save thedf Gaz GOAL: Children: Quara ! / j CARE: WVE: Gibla ! l ! Save the Children: Welthungerhilfe: k d k/ Takusa dlfj k
    [Show full text]
  • English-Full (0.5
    Enhancing the Role of Forestry in Building Climate Resilient Green Economy in Ethiopia Strategy for scaling up effective forest management practices in Amhara National Regional State with particular emphasis on smallholder plantations Wubalem Tadesse Alemu Gezahegne Teshome Tesema Bitew Shibabaw Berihun Tefera Habtemariam Kassa Center for International Forestry Research Ethiopia Office Addis Ababa October 2015 Copyright © Center for International Forestry Research, 2015 Cover photo by authors FOREWORD This regional strategy document for scaling up effective forest management practices in Amhara National Regional State, with particular emphasis on smallholder plantations, was produced as one of the outputs of a project entitled “Enhancing the Role of Forestry in Ethiopia’s Climate Resilient Green Economy”, and implemented between September 2013 and August 2015. CIFOR and our ministry actively collaborated in the planning and implementation of the project, which involved over 25 senior experts drawn from Federal ministries, regional bureaus, Federal and regional research institutes, and from Wondo Genet College of Forestry and Natural Resources and other universities. The senior experts were organised into five teams, which set out to identify effective forest management practices, and enabling conditions for scaling them up, with the aim of significantly enhancing the role of forests in building a climate resilient green economy in Ethiopia. The five forest management practices studied were: the establishment and management of area exclosures; the management of plantation forests; Participatory Forest Management (PFM); agroforestry (AF); and the management of dry forests and woodlands. Each team focused on only one of the five forest management practices, and concentrated its study in one regional state.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia: Amhara Region Administrative Map (As of 05 Jan 2015)
    Ethiopia: Amhara region administrative map (as of 05 Jan 2015) ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Abrha jara ! Tselemt !Adi Arikay Town ! Addi Arekay ! Zarima Town !Kerakr ! ! T!IGRAY Tsegede ! ! Mirab Armacho Beyeda ! Debark ! Debarq Town ! Dil Yibza Town ! ! Weken Town Abergele Tach Armacho ! Sanja Town Mekane Berhan Town ! Dabat DabatTown ! Metema Town ! Janamora ! Masero Denb Town ! Sahla ! Kokit Town Gedebge Town SUDAN ! ! Wegera ! Genda Wuha Town Ziquala ! Amba Giorges Town Tsitsika Town ! ! ! ! Metema Lay ArmachoTikil Dingay Town ! Wag Himra North Gonder ! Sekota Sekota ! Shinfa Tomn Negade Bahr ! ! Gondar Chilga Aukel Ketema ! ! Ayimba Town East Belesa Seraba ! Hamusit ! ! West Belesa ! ! ARIBAYA TOWN Gonder Zuria ! Koladiba Town AMED WERK TOWN ! Dehana ! Dagoma ! Dembia Maksegnit ! Gwehala ! ! Chuahit Town ! ! ! Salya Town Gaz Gibla ! Infranz Gorgora Town ! ! Quara Gelegu Town Takusa Dalga Town ! ! Ebenat Kobo Town Adis Zemen Town Bugna ! ! ! Ambo Meda TownEbinat ! ! Yafiga Town Kobo ! Gidan Libo Kemkem ! Esey Debr Lake Tana Lalibela Town Gomenge ! Lasta ! Muja Town Robit ! ! ! Dengel Ber Gobye Town Shahura ! ! ! Wereta Town Kulmesk Town Alfa ! Amedber Town ! ! KUNIZILA TOWN ! Debre Tabor North Wollo ! Hara Town Fogera Lay Gayint Weldiya ! Farta ! Gasay! Town Meket ! Hamusit Ketrma ! ! Filahit Town Guba Lafto ! AFAR South Gonder Sal!i Town Nefas mewicha Town ! ! Fendiqa Town Zege Town Anibesema Jawi ! ! ! MersaTown Semen Achefer ! Arib Gebeya YISMALA TOWN ! Este Town Arb Gegeya Town Kon Town ! ! ! ! Wegel tena Town Habru ! Fendka Town Dera
    [Show full text]
  • International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences
    Int. J. Adv. Res. Biol. Sci. (2019). 6(2): 110-117 International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences ISSN: 2348-8069 www.ijarbs.com DOI: 10.22192/ijarbs Coden: IJARQG(USA) Volume 6, Issue 2 - 2019 Research Article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22192/ijarbs.2019.06.02.013 A Cross Sectional Study on the Prevalence and Possible Risk Factors of Bovine Schistosomiasis in and Around Gozamen District, Northwest Ethiopia Yezina Mengist1 and Nigussie Yilak2* 1 Gozamen Agricultural Office , East Gojjam, ETHIOPIA 2Shewa Robit Municipal Abattoir, Shewa Robit, ETHIOPIA *Corresponding author: Nigussie Yilak; email: [email protected] Abstract A cross sectional study was conducted from April, 2017 to July 2017 in and around Gozamen district to estimate the prevalence and possible risk factors of bovine Schistosomiasis. Simple random sampling was used to select the study animals and sedimentation technique. Out of 384 faecal samples examined 101(26.3%) were found positive for bovine Schistosomiasis. The prevalence of bovine Schistosomiasis was higher in local breed cattle (29.3%) than cross breed cattle (16.1%). Similarly, the prevalence of the disease in male and female cattle was 26.2% and 26.4%, respectively. Cattle having less than 2 years, 2-5years and greater than 5 years old had (18.8%), (28.7%) and (26.0%) disease prevalence, respectively without significant statistical difference (p>0.05). The highest prevalence of Schistosoma infection was observed in poor body conditioned animals (35.5%) followed by medium body conditioned animals (21.1%). Whereas, the lowest prevalence of the disease was observed in good body conditioned animals (11.4%).
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia: Administrative Map (August 2017)
    Ethiopia: Administrative map (August 2017) ERITREA National capital P Erob Tahtay Adiyabo Regional capital Gulomekeda Laelay Adiyabo Mereb Leke Ahferom Red Sea Humera Adigrat ! ! Dalul ! Adwa Ganta Afeshum Aksum Saesie Tsaedaemba Shire Indasilase ! Zonal Capital ! North West TigrayTahtay KoraroTahtay Maychew Eastern Tigray Kafta Humera Laelay Maychew Werei Leke TIGRAY Asgede Tsimbila Central Tigray Hawzen Medebay Zana Koneba Naeder Adet Berahile Region boundary Atsbi Wenberta Western Tigray Kelete Awelallo Welkait Kola Temben Tselemti Degua Temben Mekele Zone boundary Tanqua Abergele P Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Tsegede Tselemt Mekele Town Special Enderta Afdera Addi Arekay South East Ab Ala Tsegede Mirab Armacho Beyeda Woreda boundary Debark Erebti SUDAN Hintalo Wejirat Saharti Samre Tach Armacho Abergele Sanja ! Dabat Janamora Megale Bidu Alaje Sahla Addis Ababa Ziquala Maychew ! Wegera Metema Lay Armacho Wag Himra Endamehoni Raya Azebo North Gondar Gonder ! Sekota Teru Afar Chilga Southern Tigray Gonder City Adm. Yalo East Belesa Ofla West Belesa Kurri Dehana Dembia Gonder Zuria Alamata Gaz Gibla Zone 4 (Fantana Rasu ) Elidar Amhara Gelegu Quara ! Takusa Ebenat Gulina Bugna Awra Libo Kemkem Kobo Gidan Lasta Benishangul Gumuz North Wello AFAR Alfa Zone 1(Awsi Rasu) Debre Tabor Ewa ! Fogera Farta Lay Gayint Semera Meket Guba Lafto DPubti DJIBOUTI Jawi South Gondar Dire Dawa Semen Achefer East Esite Chifra Bahir Dar Wadla Delanta Habru Asayita P Tach Gayint ! Bahir Dar City Adm. Aysaita Guba AMHARA Dera Ambasel Debub Achefer Bahirdar Zuria Dawunt Worebabu Gambela Dangura West Esite Gulf of Aden Mecha Adaa'r Mile Pawe Special Simada Thehulederie Kutaber Dangila Yilmana Densa Afambo Mekdela Tenta Awi Dessie Bati Hulet Ej Enese ! Hareri Sayint Dessie City Adm.
    [Show full text]
  • AMHARA Demography and Health
    1 AMHARA Demography and Health Aynalem Adugna January 1, 2021 www.EthioDemographyAndHealth.Org 2 Amhara Suggested citation: Amhara: Demography and Health Aynalem Adugna January 1, 20201 www.EthioDemographyAndHealth.Org Landforms, Climate and Economy Located in northwestern Ethiopia the Amhara Region between 9°20' and 14°20' North latitude and 36° 20' and 40° 20' East longitude the Amhara Region has an estimated land area of about 170000 square kilometers . The region borders Tigray in the North, Afar in the East, Oromiya in the South, Benishangul-Gumiz in the Southwest and the country of Sudan to the west [1]. Amhara is divided into 11 zones, and 140 Weredas (see map at the bottom of this page). There are about 3429 kebeles (the smallest administrative units) [1]. "Decision-making power has recently been decentralized to Weredas and thus the Weredas are responsible for all development activities in their areas." The 11 administrative zones are: North Gonder, South Gonder, West Gojjam, East Gojjam, Awie, Wag Hemra, North Wollo, South Wollo, Oromia, North Shewa and Bahir Dar City special zone. [1] The historic Amhara Region contains much of the highland plateaus above 1500 meters with rugged formations, gorges and valleys, and millions of settlements for Amhara villages surrounded by subsistence farms and grazing fields. In this Region are located, the world- renowned Nile River and its source, Lake Tana, as well as historic sites including Gonder, and Lalibela. "Interspersed on the landscape are higher mountain ranges and cratered cones, the highest of which, at 4,620 meters, is Ras Dashen Terara northeast of Gonder.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining and Managing Acute Lymphangioadenitis in Podoconiosis Lymphoedema in Northern Ethiopia
    DEFINING AND MANAGING ACUTE LYMPHANGIOADENITIS IN PODOCONIOSIS LYMPHOEDEMA IN NORTHERN ETHIOPIA HENOK NEGUSSIE SEIFU PhD 2017 1 DEFINING AND MANAGING ACUTE LYMPHANGIOADENITIS IN PODOCONIOSIS LYMPHOEDEMA IN NORTHERN ETHIOPIA HENOK NEGUSSIE SEIFU A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the University of Brighton and the University of Sussex for a programme of study undertaken at Brighton and Sussex Medical School for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy JULY, 2017 2 This thesis was supervised by Prof Gail Davey, Professor of Global Health Epidemiology, Brighton and Sussex Medical Scholl, UK Prof. Melanie Newport, Professor of Global Health and Infection, Brighton and Sussex Medical Scholl, UK Prof Fikre Enquselassie, Professor of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Addis Ababa, University 3 Abstract Podoconiosis (endemic non-filarial elephantiasis) is a non-infectious disease arising in barefoot individuals in long-term contact with irritant red clay soil of volcanic origin. The condition is believed to be caused by the interplay between environmental factors and genetic susceptibility over a prolonged period of time. In the last decade significant progress had been made in research on podoconiosis. Acute dermatolymphangioadenitis (ADLA) is a common and disabling complication of podoconiosis lymphoedema and remain the most painful and distressing condition, with diverse health, social and economic ramifications, yet has been very little investigated to date. This PhD thesis is therefore, aimed at defining ADLA, validating this to measure the impact of ADLA, and to document the impact of a simple foot hygiene intervention on ADLA and quality of life among podoconiosis patients. The study utilized several steps.
    [Show full text]
  • Dairy Cattle Production, Processing and Handling of Milk and Milk Products in Enemay District, Amhara, Ethiopia. Online J. Anim. Feed Res., 8(6): 180-184
    2018 SCIENCELINE Online Journal of Animal and Feed Research Volume 8, Issue 6: 180-185; November 25, 2018 ISSN 2228-7701 DAIRY CATTLE PRODUCTION, PROCESSING AND HANDLING OF MILK AND MILK PRODUCTS IN ENEMAY DISTRICT, AMHARA, ETHIOPIA Habtamu AYALEW1, Asmamaw YINNESU1 and Adugnaw ABATENHE2 1University of Gondar, College of Veterinary Medicine and animal sciences, P.O.Box. 196, Gondar, Ethiopia 2Deber Work, Technical vocational and Educational Training College, P.O.Box.042, Deber Work, Ethiopia Supporting Information Revised: Revised: July Received: PII: S222877011 ARTICLE ORIGINAL ABSTRACT: The objective of the study was to assess dairy cattle production systems, processing and handling systems of cow milk and milk products in the highlands of Ethiopia. The study was conducted from 2017 to 2018 in Enemay district, Amhara, Ethiopia. The sample kebeles and household for the study were selected based on stratification and purposive sampling techniques. Three rural and two urban and pre urban kebeles Nov were selected. From each kebele 30 households (total of 150 households) were selected randomly from those 2 20 0 , 201 , 201 , have at least two lactating cows. Dairy cooperatives and private farms were included during the study. 8 Descriptive statistics was employed for data analysis using Statistical Procedures for Social Sciences (SPSS) 000 8 8 version 20.0. Dairy cattle production systems that identified in the study areas were rural smallholder or mixed 25 - crop- livestock production which accounts 98% and the rest 2% were urban and pre urban system. Out of the 8 total milk produced per households per day 0.42±1.8 liters was used for traditional milk processing.
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    Report One size does not fit all The patterning and drivers of child marriage in Ethiopia’s hotspot districts Nicola Jones, Bekele Tefera, Guday Emirie, Bethelihem Gebre, Kiros Berhanu, Elizabeth Presler-Marshall, David Walker, Taveeshi Gupta and Georgia Plank March 2016 This research was conducted by Overseas Development Institute (ODI), contracted by UNICEF in collaboration with the National Alliance to End Child Marriage and FGM in Ethiopia by 2025. UNICEF and ODI hold joint copyright. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the policies or views of UNICEF or ODI. UNICEF Ethiopia UNECA Compound, Zambezi Building Tel: +251115184000 Fax: +251115511628 E-mail:[email protected] www.unicef.org/Ethiopia Overseas Development Institute 203 Blackfriars Road London SE1 8NJ Tel. +44 (0) 20 7922 0300 Fax. +44 (0) 20 7922 0399 E-mail: [email protected] www.odi.org www.odi.org/facebook www.odi.org/twitter Readers are encouraged to reproduce material from ODI Reports for their own publications, as long as they are not being sold commercially. As copyright holder, ODI and UNICEF request due acknowledgement and a copy of the publication. For online use, we ask readers to link to the original resource on the ODI and UNICEF websites. © Overseas Development Institute and United Nations Children’s Fund 2015. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial Licence (CC BY-NC 3.0). ISSN: 2052-7209 All ODI Reports are available from www.odi.org Cover photo: Hands, Ethiopia
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia Social Accountability Program (ESAP3)
    Ethiopia Social Accountability Program (ESAP3) Grant Agreement [TF0A9293] Progress Report Project Year 2, Quarter 3 July – September 2020 MANAGEMENT AGENCY Multi Donor Trust Fund Table of contents Table of contents ..................................................................................... 2 List of Acronyms ..................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary ............................................................................... 4 Technical Progress .................................................................................. 5 1. MA main activities .......................................................................................... 5 1.1. COTL support and coordination .......................................................................................... 5 1.2 Resumption of SA activities ................................................................................................. 5 2. SAIP activities ................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Accessing citizens in ESAP operational areas with COVID-19 information through CRs .. 8 2.1.1Dissemination of reliable, factual and up to date COVID-19 information .................... 8 2.1.2 Reaching out to community groups with special needs .............................................. 8 2.1.3 Engaging community leaders and influential citizens .................................................. 9 2.1.4 Using other innovative mechanisms to access
    [Show full text]