DOCSLIB.ORG

33003421.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
33003421.Pdf A//J-Ai--473 FR0108170 COMPARISON OF RADIOTOXICITY OF URANIUM, PLUTONIUM, AND THORIUM SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL AT LONG-TERM STORAGE A. GERASIMOV, G. KISELEV, T. ZARITSKAYA, L. MYRTSYMOVA, SSC RFITEP 25, B.Cheremushkinskaya, Moscow 117259, Russia - E-mail: [email protected] Key words: Spent Fuel, Radwaste, Storage The radiotoxicity of long-lived actinides and fission products of spent nuclear fuel is a measure of the radiological danger of radwaste during long-term storage. Radiotoxicity of fission products decreases by about five orders of magnitude after decay of Sr-90 and Cs-137. The rest of long-lived nuclides should be directed to final storage or transmutation. Situation with actinides is more serious as they have a high radiotoxicity for a long time. The problem of long-lived actinide management could be solved within the framework of closed nuclear fuel cycle using long-term controllable storage and some kind of nuclear transmutation. The design of long-term storage facility depends on radwaste radiation characteristics. Decay heat power along with radiotoxicity is an important radiation characteristic. Both decay heat power and radiotoxicity of actinides are determined by alpha decays. Thus time dependence of actinide decay and heat power repeats in general that of radiotoxicity. The development of nuclear power is closely related to new types of nuclear fuel. Plutonium MOX fuel and thorium fuel allow to extend the fuel base of nuclear power. The level of transplutonic nuclides accumulated in MOX fuel is higher than that in uranium fuel. On the contrary, accumulation of plutonium and more heavy nuclides in thorium fuel is much less than in uranium fuel. So, study of the radiotoxicity of these types of fuel is important from the environmental point of view. Time dependence of radiotoxicity of actinides from spent uranium, MOX-plutonium, and thorium fuel calculated for storage during 1000 years is discussed in the paper. The radiotoxicity RT, of nuclide / by air or by water is determined by the ratio RT/ = A/ / MPA,, where A is the activity of considered amount of the nuclide /', MPA, - the maximum permissible activity of this nuclide in air or in water according to radiation safety standards. Total radiotoxicity is equal to the sum of radiotoxicities of all nuclides taken in those amounts in which they are contained in considered mixture. For the calculations, current data of MPA accepted in Russia [1] were used. 33/04 OGOO Calculation results Total radiotoxicity of actinides by water and contribution of most important nuclides in storage of spent uranium and plutonium fuel of light water WER-1000 type power reactor during 1000 years are presented in Tables 1 and 2. The initial amount of actinides corresponds to their contents in 1 ton of spent fuel with a burnup of 40 GW.d/ton and subsequent cooling during 3 years. The fresh uranium fuel is uranium with 4.4 % enrichment. The fresh plutonium fuel is a mixture of depleted uranium with addition of 3.5% Pu-239. Only isotopes of neptunium, plutonium, americium, and curium were considered in the calculations. T, year Nuclide 1 3 10 30 100 300 1000 Np-237 1.3-4 1.3-4 1.3-4 1.3-4 1.6-4 2.4-4 3.7^ Pu-238 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.1 0.62 0.13 5.4-4 Pu-239 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.22 0.22 Pu-240 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.36 0.33 Pu-241 1.6 1.5 1.1 0.40 1.4-2 - - Pu-242 1.5-3 1.5-3 1.5-3 1.5-3 1.5-3 1.5-3 1.5-3 Am-241 0.55 0.76 1.3 2.2 2.5 1.8 0.56 Am-242m 1.3-3 1.3-3 1.2-3 1.1-3 8.1-4 3.3-4 - Am-243 1.3-2 1.3-2 1.3-2 1.3-2 1.3-2 1.2-2 1.2-2 Cm-242 2.78-3 1.8-4 - - - - - Cm-243 4.65-3 4.4-3 3.7-3 2.3-3 4.2^ - - Cm-244 1.00 0.93 0.71 0.33 2.3-2 - - Cm-245 2.2-4 2.2^ 2.2^ 2.2-4 2.2^ 2.1-4 2.0-4 Total 5.2 5.1 5.0 4.6 3.8 2.5 1.2 Table 1. Radiotoxicity of actinides from 1 ton of uranium spent fuel, 1014 kg water T, year Nuclide 1 3 10 30 100 300 1000 Pu-238 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.6 0.91 0.19 1.1-3 Pu-239 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.42 0.42 Pu-240 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 Pu-241 4.2 3.8 2.7 1.0 3.6-2 6.3-5 - Am-241 1.5 2.1 3.6 5.8 6.5 4.8 1.5 Am-242m 1.3-2 1.3-2 1.3-2 1.2-2 8.4-3 3.4-3 1.4-4 Am-243 4.5-2 4.5-2 4.5-2 4.5-2 4.5-2 4.4-2 4.1-2 Cm-242 1.3-2 1.2-3 6.4^ 5.8^ 4.2-4 1.7-4 - Cm-243 3.5-2 3.4-2 2.8-2 1.7-2 3.2-3 2.5-5 - Cm-244 3.5 3.2 2.5 1.2 7.9-2 3.8-5 - Total 13 13 12 11 9.2 6.6 3.1 Table 2. Radiotoxicity of actinides from 1 ton of spent plutonium fuel, 10 kg water Analogous data for actinides from spent thorium fuel of WER-1000 type reactor are presented in Table 3. The fresh fuel is a mix of thorium with addition of 3.3 % U-233. Actinide content in spent thorium fuel was calculated for neutron spectrum created by oooo basic uranium fuel of WER type reactor, burnup of 42 GW.d/ton, and subsequent cooling during 3 years. Isotopes of thorium, uranium, and heavier nuclides were taken into account. Data of Table 3 as well as those of Tables 1 and 2 are normalized to the amount of actinides extracted from 1 ton of spent fuel. T, year Nuclide 1 3 10 30 100 300 1000 Th-228 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.21 0.10 1.2-2 1.5-5 Th-232 6.3-5 6.3-5 6.3-5 6.3-5 6.3-5 6.3-5 6.3-5 U-232 1.2 1.2 1.1 0.92 0.45 6.0-2 6.5-5 U-233 2.7-4 2.7-4 2.7-4 2.7-4 2.7-4 2.7-4 2.7-4 U-234 4.4-3 4.4-3 4.4-3 4.4-3 4.4-3 4.4-3 4.4-3 Pu-238 7.0-2 6.9-2 6.5-2 5.6-2 3.2-2 6.6-3 2.6-5 Pu-239 3.5-5 3.5-5 3.5-5 3.5-5 3.5-5 3.5-5 3.4-5 Pu-240 2.6-5 2.6-5 2.6-5 2.6-5 2.6-5 2.5-5 2.4-5 Pu-241 8.0-5 7.2-5 5.2-5 2.0-5 6.8-7 - - Am-241 2.5-5 3.5-5 6.4-5 1.1-4 1.2-4 8.7-5 2.8-5 Total 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.2 0.59 8.6-2 5.4-3 Table 3. Radiotoxicity of actinides from 1 ton of spent thorium fuel, 10 kg water The data presented demonstrate that the radiotoxicity of actinides of spent uranium fuel by water in the initial period of storage is determined by nuclides Pu-241, Cm- 244, and Pu-238. Their contribution at the beginning of storage is about 80%. All isotopes of plutonium give 70%, Cm-244 - 20%. In addition, Am-241 creates 10% of radiotoxicity. During storage Pu-241 decays into Am-241. After 100 years of storage, total radiotoxicity of actinides decreases 1.4 times. The main contribution, 68% is given by Am-241. The contribution of plutonium isotopes makes 33%. The amount of Cm-244 decreases essentially because of decay. Its radiotoxicity falls 43 times and makes 0.6% of total radiotoxicity at the end of 100-year storage. In the period of 100-1000 years, the main contribution is made by Am-241. After 1000 years, the radiotoxicity decreases 4.3 times. The main nuclides are Am-241, Pu-240, Pu-239. The radiotoxicity of actinides of spent plutonium fuel by water in the initial period of storage is determined by the same nuclides Pu-241, Cm-244, and Pu-238 as in the case of uranium fuel. All plutonium isotopes give a contribution of 60% of the total radiotoxicity, Cm-244 gives 27%, Am-241 gives 12%. After 100 years of storage, total radiotoxicity of actinides decreases 1.4 times. The main contribution, 70 % is given by Am-241. The contribution of plutonium isotopes makes 26%, Cm-244 - 0.9% of the total radiotoxicity. After 1000 years, the radiotoxicity decreases 4.2 times.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Measurements of Fission Cross Sections for the Isotopes Relevant to the Thorium Fuel Cycle
    EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH CERN/INTC 2001-025 INTC/P-145 08 Aug 2001 Measurements of Fission Cross Sections for the Isotopes relevant to the Thorium Fuel Cycle The n_TOF Collaboration ABBONDANNO U.20, ANDRIAMONJE S.10, ANDRZEJEWSKI J.24, ANGELOPOULOS A.12, ASSIMAKOPOULOS P.15, BACRI C-O.8, BADUREK G.1, BAUMANN P.9, BEER H.11, BENLLIURE J.32, BERTHIER B.8, BONDARENKO I.26, BOS A.J.J.36, BUSTREO N.19, CALVINO F.33, CANO-OTT D.28, CAPOTE R.31, CARLSON P.34, CHARPAK G.5, CHAUVIN N.8, CENNINI P.5, CHEPEL V.25, COLONNA N.20, CORTES G.33, CORTINA D.32, CORVI F.23, DAMIANOGLOU D.16, DAVID S.8, DIMOVASILI E.12, DOMINGO C.29, DOROSHENKO A.27, DURAN ESCRIBANO I.32, ELEFTHERIADIS C.16, EMBID M.28, FERRANT L.8, FERRARI A.5, FERREIRA–MARQUES R.25, FRAIS–KOELBL H.3, FURMAN W.26, FURSOV B.27, GARZON J.A.32, GIOMATARIS I.10, GLEDENOV Y.26, GONZALEZ–ROMERO E.28, GOVERDOVSKI A.27, GRAMEGNA F.19, GRIESMAYER E.3, GUNSING F.10, HAIGHT R.37, HEIL M.11, HOLLANDER P.36, IOANNIDES K.G.15, IOANNOU P.12, ISAEV S.27, JERICHA E.1, KADI Y.5, KAEPPELER F.11, KARADIMOS D.17, KARAMANIS D.15, KAYUKOV A.26, KAZAKOV L.27, KELIC A.9, KETLEROV V.27, KITIS G.16, KOEHLER P.E.38., KOPACH Y.26, KOSSIONIDES E.14, KROSHKINA I.27, LACOSTE V.5, LAMBOUDIS C.16, LEEB H.1, LEPRETRE A.10, LOPES M.25, LOZANO M.31, MARRONE S.20, MARTINEZ-VAL J.
    [Show full text]
  • THE NATURAL RADIOACTIVITY of the BIOSPHERE (Prirodnaya Radioaktivnost' Iosfery)
    XA04N2887 INIS-XA-N--259 L.A. Pertsov TRANSLATED FROM RUSSIAN Published for the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission and the National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C. by the Israel Program for Scientific Translations L. A. PERTSOV THE NATURAL RADIOACTIVITY OF THE BIOSPHERE (Prirodnaya Radioaktivnost' iosfery) Atomizdat NMoskva 1964 Translated from Russian Israel Program for Scientific Translations Jerusalem 1967 18 02 AEC-tr- 6714 Published Pursuant to an Agreement with THE U. S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION and THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION, WASHINGTON, D. C. Copyright (D 1967 Israel Program for scientific Translations Ltd. IPST Cat. No. 1802 Translated and Edited by IPST Staff Printed in Jerusalem by S. Monison Available from the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information Springfield, Va. 22151 VI/ Table of Contents Introduction .1..................... Bibliography ...................................... 5 Chapter 1. GENESIS OF THE NATURAL RADIOACTIVITY OF THE BIOSPHERE ......................... 6 § Some historical problems...................... 6 § 2. Formation of natural radioactive isotopes of the earth ..... 7 §3. Radioactive isotope creation by cosmic radiation. ....... 11 §4. Distribution of radioactive isotopes in the earth ........ 12 § 5. The spread of radioactive isotopes over the earth's surface. ................................. 16 § 6. The cycle of natural radioactive isotopes in the biosphere. ................................ 18 Bibliography ................ .................. 22 Chapter 2. PHYSICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF NATURAL RADIOACTIVE ISOTOPES. ........... 24 § 1. The contribution of individual radioactive isotopes to the total radioactivity of the biosphere. ............... 24 § 2. Properties of radioactive isotopes not belonging to radio- active families . ............ I............ 27 § 3. Properties of radioactive isotopes of the radioactive families. ................................ 38 § 4. Properties of radioactive isotopes of rare-earth elements .
    [Show full text]
  • A Note on Radioactive Materials and Their Measurements Elements Are
    A NOTE ON RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS AND THEIR MEASUREMENTS Elements are placed in the periodic table of elements according to atomic number or proton number often referred to as Z. Their atomic weights are also usually indicated and can be fractional if the element in nature contains more than one isotope. Isotopes of an element all have the same atomic number, Z, but have different numbers of neu- trons. Some of these isotopes, even in naturally occurring elements, may be radioactive, and are usually given the atomic weight of the longest known isotope. Radioactive decay occurs when an unstable atom loses energy by emitting particles and gamma radiation or by spontaneously fission- ing. (Spontaneous fission is one of the natural modes of radioactive decay in which fission occurs without the addition of external energy or particles.) The activity of a radioactive sample is simply the rate of radioactive decay, expressed as the number of decays per unit time. Traditionally, the curie (Ci) was used to quantify the decay rate and was defined as the radioactivity measured for one gram of pure radium, or ~3.7 × 1010 decays per second (d/s), but the value changed as measurement techniques improved. To avoid this problem of a “chang- ing” constant, the Curie is now defined as exactly 3.7 × 1010 d/s. The becquerel (Bq), equal to one d/s, is the official SI unit (International System of Units). The roentgen R( ) is commonly used as a unit of radiation exposure to X-ray or gamma radiation, and can be roughly defined as “that quan- tity of X-ray or gamma radiation needed to produce one electrostatic unit of ionic charge in one cm3 of air under standard temperature and pressure (STP) “normal conditions”.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiological Implications of Plutonium Recycle and the Use of Thorium Fuels in Power Reactor Operations
    01 RD/B/N3523 Central Electricity Generating Board Research Department Berkeley Nuclear Laboratories RADIOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS OF PLUTONIUM RECYCLE AND THE USE OF THORIUM FUELS IN POWER REACTOR OPERATIONS By H. F. Macdonald XJ034 January 1976 DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. Radiological Implications of Plutonium Recycle and the Use of Thorium Fuels in Power Reactor Operations “ by - H.F. Macdonald Approved Head of Health Physics Research Section For inclusion in Nuclear Science Abstracts SUMMARY As economically attractive sources of natural uranium are gradually depleted attention will turn to recycling plutonium or the use of thorium fuels. In this study the radiological implications of these fuel cycles in terms of fuel handling and radioactive waste disposal are investigated in 235 relation to a conventional U enriched oxide fuel. It is suggested that a comparative study of this nature may be an important aspect of the overall optimisation of future fuel cycle strategies. It is shown that the use of thorium based fuels has distinct advan­ tages in terms of neutron dose rates from irradiated fuels and long term a decay heating commitment compared with conventional uranium/plutonium fuels. However, this introduces a y dose rate problem in the fabrication 233 and handling of unirradiated U fuels. For both plutonium and thorium fuels these radiological problems increase during storage of the fuel prior to reactor irradiation. Finally, the novel health physics problems which arise in the handling and processing of thorium fuels are reviewed in an appendix.
    [Show full text]
  • 12 Natural Isotopes of Elements Other Than H, C, O
    12 NATURAL ISOTOPES OF ELEMENTS OTHER THAN H, C, O In this chapter we are dealing with the less common applications of natural isotopes. Our discussions will be restricted to their origin and isotopic abundances and the main characteristics. Only brief indications are given about possible applications. More details are presented in the other volumes of this series. A few isotopes are mentioned only briefly, as they are of little relevance to water studies. Based on their half-life, the isotopes concerned can be subdivided: 1) stable isotopes of some elements (He, Li, B, N, S, Cl), of which the abundance variations point to certain geochemical and hydrogeological processes, and which can be applied as tracers in the hydrological systems, 2) radioactive isotopes with half-lives exceeding the age of the universe (232Th, 235U, 238U), 3) radioactive isotopes with shorter half-lives, mainly daughter nuclides of the previous catagory of isotopes, 4) radioactive isotopes with shorter half-lives that are of cosmogenic origin, i.e. that are being produced in the atmosphere by interactions of cosmic radiation particles with atmospheric molecules (7Be, 10Be, 26Al, 32Si, 36Cl, 36Ar, 39Ar, 81Kr, 85Kr, 129I) (Lal and Peters, 1967). The isotopes can also be distinguished by their chemical characteristics: 1) the isotopes of noble gases (He, Ar, Kr) play an important role, because of their solubility in water and because of their chemically inert and thus conservative character. Table 12.1 gives the solubility values in water (data from Benson and Krause, 1976); the table also contains the atmospheric concentrations (Andrews, 1992: error in his Eq.4, where Ti/(T1) should read (Ti/T)1); 2) another category consists of the isotopes of elements that are only slightly soluble and have very low concentrations in water under moderate conditions (Be, Al).
    [Show full text]
  • Fast-Spectrum Reactors Technology Assessment
    Clean Power Quadrennial Technology Review 2015 Chapter 4: Advancing Clean Electric Power Technologies Technology Assessments Advanced Plant Technologies Biopower Clean Power Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage Value- Added Options Carbon Dioxide Capture for Natural Gas and Industrial Applications Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies Carbon Dioxide Storage Technologies Crosscutting Technologies in Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage Fast-spectrum Reactors Geothermal Power High Temperature Reactors Hybrid Nuclear-Renewable Energy Systems Hydropower Light Water Reactors Marine and Hydrokinetic Power Nuclear Fuel Cycles Solar Power Stationary Fuel Cells U.S. DEPARTMENT OF Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Brayton Cycle ENERGY Wind Power Clean Power Quadrennial Technology Review 2015 Fast-spectrum Reactors Chapter 4: Technology Assessments Background and Current Status From the initial conception of nuclear energy, it was recognized that full realization of the energy content of uranium would require the development of fast reactors with associated nuclear fuel cycles.1 Thus, fast reactor technology was a key focus in early nuclear programs in the United States and abroad, with the first usable nuclear electricity generated by a fast reactor—Experimental Breeder Reactor I (EBR-I)—in 1951. Test and/or demonstration reactors were built and operated in the United States, France, Japan, United Kingdom, Russia, India, Germany, and China—totaling about 20 reactors with 400 operating years to date. These previous reactors and current projects are summarized in Table 4.H.1.2 Currently operating test reactors include BOR-60 (Russia), Fast Breeder Test Reactor (FBTR) (India), and China Experimental Fast Reactor (CEFR) (China). The Russian BN-600 demonstration reactor has been operating as a power reactor since 1980.
    [Show full text]
  • Properties of Selected Radioisotopes
    CASE FILE COPY NASA SP-7031 Properties of Selected Radioisotopes A Bibliography PART I: UNCLASSIFIED LITERATURE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION NASA SP-7031 PROPERTIES OF SELECTED RADIOISOTOPES A Bibliography Part I: Unclassified Literature A selection of annotated references to technical papers, journal articles, and books This bibliography was compiled and edited by DALE HARRIS and JOSEPH EPSTEIN Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland Scientific and Technical Information Division / OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY UTILIZATION 1968 USP. NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION Washington, D.C. PREFACE The increasing interest in the application of substantial quantities of radioisotopes for propulsion, energy conversion, and various other thermal concepts emphasizes a need for the most recent and most accurate information available describing the nuclear, chemical, and physical properties of these isotopes. A substantial amount of progress has been achieved in recent years in refining old and developing new techniques of measurement of the properties quoted, and isotope processing. This has resulted in a broad technological base from which both the material and information about the material is available. Un- fortunately, it has also resulted in a multiplicity of sources so that information and data are either untimely or present properties without adequately identifying the measurement techniques or describing the quality of material used. The purpose of this document is to make available, in a single reference, an annotated bibliography and sets of properties for nine of the more attractive isotopes available for use in power production. Part I contains all the unclassified information that was available in the literature surveyed. Part II is the classified counterpart to Part I.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Nuclear Power and Fuel Cycle Technologies: Outlook and Policy Options
    Order Code RL34579 Advanced Nuclear Power and Fuel Cycle Technologies: Outlook and Policy Options July 11, 2008 Mark Holt Specialist in Energy Policy Resources, Science, and Industry Division Advanced Nuclear Power and Fuel Cycle Technologies: Outlook and Policy Options Summary Current U.S. nuclear energy policy focuses on the near-term construction of improved versions of existing nuclear power plants. All of today’s U.S. nuclear plants are light water reactors (LWRs), which are cooled by ordinary water. Under current policy, the highly radioactive spent nuclear fuel from LWRs is to be permanently disposed of in a deep underground repository. The Bush Administration is also promoting an aggressive U.S. effort to move beyond LWR technology into advanced reactors and fuel cycles. Specifically, the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP), under the Department of Energy (DOE) is developing advanced reprocessing (or recycling) technologies to extract plutonium and uranium from spent nuclear fuel, as well as an advanced reactor that could fully destroy long-lived radioactive isotopes. DOE’s Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems Initiative is developing other advanced reactor technologies that could be safer than LWRs and produce high-temperature heat to make hydrogen. DOE’s advanced nuclear technology programs date back to the early years of the Atomic Energy Commission in the 1940s and 1950s. In particular, it was widely believed that breeder reactors — designed to produce maximum amounts of plutonium from natural uranium — would be necessary for providing sufficient fuel for a large commercial nuclear power industry. Early research was also conducted on a wide variety of other power reactor concepts, some of which are still under active consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nuclear Fuel Cycle
    THE COLLECTION > From the uranium mine> toI wNTasRtOeD dUisCpToIsOaN l 1 > The atom 2 > Radioactivity 3 > Radiation and man 4 > Energy 5 > Nuclear energy: fusion and fission 6 > How a nuclear reactor works 7 > The nuclear fuel cycle 7 > The nuclear fuel cycle FROM RESEARCH 8 > Microelectronics 9 > The laser: a concentrate of light TO INDUSTRY 10 > Medical imaging 11 > Nuclear astrophysics 12 > Hydrogen 7 >>TThhee nnuucclleeaarr ffuueell ccyyccllee UPSTREAM THE REACTOR: PREPARING THE FUEL IN THE REACTOR: FUEL CONSUMPTION DOWNSTREAM THE REACTOR: REPROCESSING NUCLEAR WASTE NUCLEAR WASTE © Commissariat à l’’Énergie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives, 2005 Communication Division Bâtiment Siège - 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette cedex www.cea.fr ISSN 1637-5408. From the uranium mine to waste disposal 7 > The nuclear fuel cycle From the uranium mine to waste disposal 7 > The nuclear fuel cycle 2 > CONTENTS > INTRODUCTION 3 Uranium ore is extracted from open-pit mines – such as the McClear mines in Canada seen here – or underground workings. a m e g o C © “The nuclear fuel cycle includes an erray UPSTREAM THE REACTOR: of industrial operations, from uranium PREPARING THE FUEL 4 e mining to the disposal of radioactive l Extracting uranium from the ore 5 waste.” c Concentrating and refining uranium 6 y Enriching uranium 6 c Enrichment methods 8 l introduction uel is a material that can be burnt to pro - IN THE REACTOR: FUEL CONSUMPTION 9 Fvide heat. The most familiar fuels are wood, e Preparing fuel assemblies 10 coal, natural gas and oil. By analogy, the ura - e g a nium used in nuclear power plants is called Per unit or mass (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Scavenging and Circulation Ocean Model of Thorium-230 and Protactinium-231 with Improved Particle Dynamics (NEMO–Prothorp 0.1)
    Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3537–3556, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3537-2018 © Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. A global scavenging and circulation ocean model of thorium-230 and protactinium-231 with improved particle dynamics (NEMO–ProThorP 0.1) Marco van Hulten1,2, Jean-Claude Dutay1, and Matthieu Roy-Barman1 1Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, IPSL, CEA–Orme des Merisiers, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France 2Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway Correspondence: Marco van Hulten ([email protected]) Received: 1 November 2017 – Discussion started: 8 December 2017 Revised: 16 August 2018 – Accepted: 20 August 2018 – Published: 31 August 2018 Abstract. In this paper we set forth a 3-D ocean model of the can be done based on our model as its source code is readily radioactive trace isotopes 230Th and 231Pa. The interest arises available. from the fact that these isotopes are extensively used for in- vestigating particle transport in the ocean and reconstructing past ocean circulation. The tracers are reversibly scavenged 1 Introduction by biogenic and lithogenic particles. Our simulations of 230Th and 231Pa are based on the Oceanic circulation and the carbon cycle play a major role NEMO–PISCES ocean biogeochemistry general circulation in the regulation of the past and present climate. Heat and model, which includes biogenic particles, namely small and carbon dioxide in the atmosphere tend to equilibrate with the big particulate organic carbon, calcium carbonate and bio- ocean surface and are transported down into the deep ocean genic silica.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulations of the Chinese Nuclear Fuel Cycle Scenario Using a New Code
    Simulations of the Chinese Nuclear Fuel Cycle Scenario Using a New Code YOUPENG ZHANG Master of Science Diploma Work Department of Reactor Physics Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm, 2007 TRITA-FYS 2007:42 Abstract One of the most important affairs in the nuclear industry is the fuel cycle situation prediction. It affects the energy company’s profit, environment and even the safety of reactor operation. For these reasons, a series of computer codes have been generated to simulate the fuel cycle scenario including NFCSim, ORION and so on. At the Department of Reactor Physics, a new fuel cycle simulation code is under development and this code will be used in the present thesis. In order to simulate the nuclides transmutation chains, MCNP was first used to calculate the neutron spectrum and cross section data for the reactor cores, using JEF 3.0 and EAF 99 data libraries. The main task of this project is to simulate the present and future status of all the facilities in Chinese reactor park. Three consecutive scenarios (present, near-term and long-term) are defined for this comparison, simulation time scale is set to be 208 years (1992~2200) and four groups of nuclides (major actinides, minor actinides, major fission products and safety related nuclides) are defined and presented. Power balance scenario, plutonium self-sustained scenario and CIAE proposals are discussed individually as choices of reactor parks’ future development. The result is that at least 70 years (cooling storage time is not included) are needed to transmute the minor actinides inventory after the large-scale FBR (Fast Breeder Reactor) technology is mature enough for large scale commissioning in plutonium-sustained scenario.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Fuel Cycles Technology Assessment
    Clean Power Quadrennial Technology Review 2015 Chapter 4: Advancing Clean Electric Power Technologies Technology Assessments Advanced Plant Technologies Biopower Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage Clean Power Value-Added Options Carbon Dioxide Capture for Natural Gas and Industrial Applications Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies Carbon Dioxide Storage Technologies Crosscutting Technologies in Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage Fast-spectrum Reactors Geothermal Power High Temperature Reactors Hybrid Nuclear-Renewable Energy Systems Hydropower Light Water Reactors Marine and Hydrokinetic Power Nuclear Fuel Cycles Solar Power Stationary Fuel Cells Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Brayton Cycle U.S. DEPARTMENT OF Wind Power ENERGY Clean Power Quadrennial Technology Review 2015 Nuclear Fuel Cycles Chapter 4: Technology Assessments Introduction and Background The Nuclear Fuel Cycle (NFC) is defined as the total set of operations required to produce fission energy and manage the associated nuclear materials. It can have different attributes, including the extension of natural resources, or the minimization of waste disposal requirements. The NFC, as depicted in Figure 4.O.1, is comprised of a set of operations that include the extraction of uranium (U) resources from the earth (and possibly from seawater), uranium enrichment and fuel fabrication, use of the fuel in reactors, interim storage of used nuclear fuel, the optional recycle of the used fuel, and the final disposition of used fuel and waste forms from the recycling processes. Thorium (Th) fuel cycles have been proposed also, but have not been commercially implemented). Figure 4.O.1 Schematic of the uranium based Nuclear Fuel Cycle 1 Quadrennial Technology Review 2015 Clean Power TA 4.O: Nuclear Fuel Cycles The nuclear fuel cycle is often grouped into three classical components (front-end, reactor, and back-end): Front End: The focus of the front end of the nuclear fuel cycle is to deliver fabricated fuel to the reactor.
    [Show full text]