DOCSLIB.ORG

Asteroid Explorer, Hayabusa2, Reporter Briefing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Asteroid Explorer, Hayabusa2, Reporter Briefing Asteroid explorer, Hayabusa2, reporter briefing February 20, 2019 JAXA Hayabusa2 Project Topics Regarding Hayabusa2: Touchdown operation plan Images from the BOX-B operation (first release) Since the content presented today is nearly the same as for the press briefing on February 6, today we will focus on Q&A. We hope you find this useful for coverage on February 22nd. 2019/02/20 Hayabusa2 reporter briefing 2 Contents 0. Hayabusa2 and mission flow outline 1. Current status and overall schedule of the project 2. Touchdown operation plan 3. Scientific importance of the touchdown 4. Images from BOX-B operation 5. Future plans Reference material 2019/02/20 Hayabusa2 reporter briefing 3 Overview of Hayabusa2 Objective We will explore and sample the C-type asteroid Ryugu, which is a more primitive type than the S-type asteroid Itokawa that Hayabusa explored, and elucidate interactions between minerals, water, and organic matter in the primitive solar system. By doing so, we will learn about the origin and evolution of Earth, the oceans, and life, and maintain and develop the technologies for deep-space return exploration (as demonstrated with Hayabusa), a field in which Japan leads the world. Expected results and effects By exploring a C-type asteroid, which is rich in water and organic materials, we will clarify interactions between the building blocks of Earth and the evolution of its oceans and life, thereby developing solar system science. Japan will further its worldwide lead in this field by taking on the new challenge of obtaining samples from a crater produced by an impacting device. We will establish stable technologies for return exploration of solar-system bodies. Features: World’s first sample return mission to a C-type asteroid. World’s first attempt at a rendezvous with an asteroid and performance of observation before and after projectile Hayabusa 2 primary specifications(Illustration: Akihiro Ikeshita) impact from an impactor. Mass Approx. 609 kg Comparison with results from Hayabusa will allow deeper understanding of the distribution, origins, and Launch 3 Dec 2014 evolution of materials in the solar system. Mission Asteroid return International positioning Arrival 27 June 2018 Japan is a leader in the field of primitive body exploration, and visiting a type-C asteroid marks a new Earth return 2020 accomplishment. Stay at asteroid Approx. 18 months This mission builds on the originality and successes of the Hayabusa mission. In addition to developing planetary Target body Near-Earth asteroid Ryugu science and solar system exploration technologies in Japan, this mission develops new frontiers in exploration of primitive heavenly bodies. Primary instruments NASA too is conducting an asteroid sample return mission, OSIRIS-REx (launch: 2016; asteroid arrival: 2018; Sampling mechanism, re-entry capsule, optical cameras, laser Earth return: 2023). We will exchange samples and otherwise promote scientific exchange, and expect further range-finder, scientific observation equipment (near-infrared, scientific findings through comparison and investigation of the results from both missions. thermal infrared), impactor, miniature rovers. 2019/02/20 Hayabusa2 reporter briefing 4 Mission Flow Launch Arrival at asteroid 3 Dec 2014 Earth swing-by June 27, 2018 3 Dec 2015 Examine the asteroid by remote sensing observations. Next, release a small lander and rover and also obtain samples from the surface. Release Earth return Depart asteroid impactor Nov–Dec 2019 late 2020 Create artificial crater Use an impactor to create an After confirming safety, artificial crater on the asteroid’s Sample touchdown within the crater surface and obtain subsurface samples analysis (Illustrations: Akihiro Ikeshita) 2019/02/20 Hayabusa2 reporter briefing 5 1. Current project status & schedule overview Current – Preparation for the descent operation for touchdown. 9 status – Touchdown operation will be from February 20 ~ 22 (start of the touchdown operation is from today). 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Schedule overview 12 3 10 12 4 6 7--.,!& 12 ##+0.125 +'0') 3'+% 5 ,1.+#50,/0#.,'" /0#.,'"-.,4'*'05,-#.0',+/ .0&.#01.+ Event ,-#.0',+ )1+!& .0&/3'+% 5 ..'2)051%1 #-.01.#$.,*51%1 -/1)#.##+0.5 1+# ,2: #! )0# 78 0#/0,-#.0',+/ ,10&#.+&#*'/-&#.#/00',+ 5 ,-#.0',+/ -0'!)+2'%0',+ ,). !,+(1+!0',+ !0 5 5 1) ,2 #! ,+#+%'+#,-#.0',+/6 . 1+ . 5 ,2 -. + 1+ 2019/02/20 Hayabusa2 reporter briefing 6 2. Touchdown operation plan outline • Touchdown (TD) date & time Feb 22, 2019 about 8am • Touchdown operation Feb 20 22, 2019 Begin descent2/21 8am All times are in JST • Touchdown location In the circle (radius 3m) in L08-E1 • Target marker (TM) Use pinpoint touchdown method with TM-B that is already dropped. Touchdown candidate site. TM indicates the position of the target marker. Image creditJAXA 2019/02/20 Hayabusa2 reporter briefing 7 2. Touchdown operation plan The region around the target maker L08-B1 and L08-E1 were selected as the touchdown candidate site. TM-B position and touchdown candidate site Image creditJAXA 2019/02/20 Hayabusa2 reporter briefing 8 2. Touchdown operation plan L08-E1 area Wide region with scattered rocks about 60cm in size. Relatively far from TM. Narrow but all rocks less than 60cm in size. Relatively close to TM. A DEMDigital Elevation Map near the touchdown candidate site image creditJAXA 2019/02/20 Hayabusa2 reporter briefing 9 2. Touchdown operation plan L08-E1 area animation A DEMDigital Elevation Map near the touchdown candidate site image creditJAXA 2019/02/20 Hayabusa2 reporter briefing 10 2. Touchdown operation plan Sequence of the touchdown operation (entire) &, #*"*+ )%* )%* #*"*+ $) $) &'(*"&% )%"% -/!&$'&)"*"&%. #(* #(*"&% *& #(*"&% Indicated time is not fixed and may change depending on the final plan and situation on ")"% #(*"&% the day of operation. *"$ "$ %&(*"$ (&+% *"$ -image credit/JAXA. 2019/02/20 Hayabusa2 reporter briefing 11 2. Touchdown operation plan Touchdown operation sequence (at low altitude) Antenna switch LGA→HGA Antenna switch TM capture with GCP- HGA→LGA NAV guidance system 45m #$! TM relative LIDAR→LRF horizontal motion Hover at TM relative takeover offset point " !'#%# &%& #! ###$ $!"# $"## 8.5m #$ ##$"$!# ./,- )+(* "# ##$"$!# $& $ 0m ~Check points of the spacecraft’s autonomous system (proceed to next operation if normal at each checkpoint) image creditJAXA 2019/02/20 Hayabusa2 reporter briefing 12 2. Touchdown operation plan Motion of the spacecraft directly before touchdown (animation, speed x10) Since we are currently tuning the position and posture, these will change in the future. image creditJAXA 2019/02/20 Hayabusa2 reporter briefing 13 2. Touchdown operation plan Motion of the spacecraft directly before touchdown (animation, speed x1) Since we are currently tuning the position and posture, these will change in the future. image creditJAXA 2019/02/20 Hayabusa2 reporter briefing 14 2. Touchdown operation plan Touchdown operation points Initial plan Reality → Assumed 100m2 possible touchdown area → For a touchdown area about 6m wide l Hayabusa touchdown method l Pinpoint touchdown method l Target marker is used to adjust the l Control the spacecraft relative to the horizontal component of the position of the target marker on the spacecraft’s motion to the velocity of asteroid surface. the asteroid surface. l LRF is used for altitude measurement and l In addition to measuring the altitude safety confirmation but not for attitude with the LRF, the spacecraft attitude control. will be rotated parallel to the asteroid l Attitude set based on planned values. surface by the measurement of LRF. 2019/02/20 Hayabusa2 reporter briefing 15 2. Touchdown operation plan Hayabusa2 pinpoint touchdown feature In order to reliably find the dropped TM, it is necessary to “Hayabusa” method guide Hayabusa2 from high altitude exactly above the TM “Pinpoint touchdown” method • By tracking the descending • Capture the already dropped TM TM after its separation, we and land at position specified can land with a zero ‘relative relative to this TM (it is possible speed’ to the ground. to offset the TM from the screen • By recognising the TM right center) after separation, tracking is • It is possible to recognise the relatively easy. arrangement of multiple TMs. • Altitude is lowered while always keeping the TM in the center of the field of view. • The landing point can be specific • Only one TM can be tracked rotation regardless of TM dropping at a time. rotation accuracy. • In this touchdown, pinpoint • Landing accuracy is It is possible to land at a position touchdown using one TM will be determined by the TM offset relative to the TM. For accurate landings, an accurate carried out. dropping accuracy. grasp of the topography is essential. TMtarget marker 2019/02/20 Hayabusa2 reporter briefing 16 2. Touchdown operation plan Measures implemented to achieve high precision landing High accuracy of asteroid model Tuning of autonomous controls Expansion of landing safety margin One example One example Accuracy of gravity model Adopt tail-up posture during landing descent orbit L08-E1 has more boulders to the east than to the west. Ryujin ridge When approaching a big mountain, the gravity becomes stronger 5~10 West East White areas = places where gravity is stronger or weaker than normal As Ryugu is not spherical, the effect of orbital bending due to Avoid high boulders by intentionally tilting slightly the mass concentration at the equatorial edge is considered. rather
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (101955) Bennu from OSIRIS-Rex Imaging and Thermal Analysis
    ARTICLES https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-019-0731-1 Properties of rubble-pile asteroid (101955) Bennu from OSIRIS-REx imaging and thermal analysis D. N. DellaGiustina 1,26*, J. P. Emery 2,26*, D. R. Golish1, B. Rozitis3, C. A. Bennett1, K. N. Burke 1, R.-L. Ballouz 1, K. J. Becker 1, P. R. Christensen4, C. Y. Drouet d’Aubigny1, V. E. Hamilton 5, D. C. Reuter6, B. Rizk 1, A. A. Simon6, E. Asphaug1, J. L. Bandfield 7, O. S. Barnouin 8, M. A. Barucci 9, E. B. Bierhaus10, R. P. Binzel11, W. F. Bottke5, N. E. Bowles12, H. Campins13, B. C. Clark7, B. E. Clark14, H. C. Connolly Jr. 15, M. G. Daly 16, J. de Leon 17, M. Delbo’18, J. D. P. Deshapriya9, C. M. Elder19, S. Fornasier9, C. W. Hergenrother1, E. S. Howell1, E. R. Jawin20, H. H. Kaplan5, T. R. Kareta 1, L. Le Corre 21, J.-Y. Li21, J. Licandro17, L. F. Lim6, P. Michel 18, J. Molaro21, M. C. Nolan 1, M. Pajola 22, M. Popescu 17, J. L. Rizos Garcia 17, A. Ryan18, S. R. Schwartz 1, N. Shultz1, M. A. Siegler21, P. H. Smith1, E. Tatsumi23, C. A. Thomas24, K. J. Walsh 5, C. W. V. Wolner1, X.-D. Zou21, D. S. Lauretta 1 and The OSIRIS-REx Team25 Establishing the abundance and physical properties of regolith and boulders on asteroids is crucial for understanding the for- mation and degradation mechanisms at work on their surfaces. Using images and thermal data from NASA’s Origins, Spectral Interpretation, Resource Identification, and Security-Regolith Explorer (OSIRIS-REx) spacecraft, we show that asteroid (101955) Bennu’s surface is globally rough, dense with boulders, and low in albedo.
    [Show full text]
  • March 21–25, 2016
    FORTY-SEVENTH LUNAR AND PLANETARY SCIENCE CONFERENCE PROGRAM OF TECHNICAL SESSIONS MARCH 21–25, 2016 The Woodlands Waterway Marriott Hotel and Convention Center The Woodlands, Texas INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT Universities Space Research Association Lunar and Planetary Institute National Aeronautics and Space Administration CONFERENCE CO-CHAIRS Stephen Mackwell, Lunar and Planetary Institute Eileen Stansbery, NASA Johnson Space Center PROGRAM COMMITTEE CHAIRS David Draper, NASA Johnson Space Center Walter Kiefer, Lunar and Planetary Institute PROGRAM COMMITTEE P. Doug Archer, NASA Johnson Space Center Nicolas LeCorvec, Lunar and Planetary Institute Katherine Bermingham, University of Maryland Yo Matsubara, Smithsonian Institute Janice Bishop, SETI and NASA Ames Research Center Francis McCubbin, NASA Johnson Space Center Jeremy Boyce, University of California, Los Angeles Andrew Needham, Carnegie Institution of Washington Lisa Danielson, NASA Johnson Space Center Lan-Anh Nguyen, NASA Johnson Space Center Deepak Dhingra, University of Idaho Paul Niles, NASA Johnson Space Center Stephen Elardo, Carnegie Institution of Washington Dorothy Oehler, NASA Johnson Space Center Marc Fries, NASA Johnson Space Center D. Alex Patthoff, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Cyrena Goodrich, Lunar and Planetary Institute Elizabeth Rampe, Aerodyne Industries, Jacobs JETS at John Gruener, NASA Johnson Space Center NASA Johnson Space Center Justin Hagerty, U.S. Geological Survey Carol Raymond, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Lindsay Hays, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Paul Schenk,
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts of the 50Th DDA Meeting (Boulder, CO)
    Abstracts of the 50th DDA Meeting (Boulder, CO) American Astronomical Society June, 2019 100 — Dynamics on Asteroids break-up event around a Lagrange point. 100.01 — Simulations of a Synthetic Eurybates 100.02 — High-Fidelity Testing of Binary Asteroid Collisional Family Formation with Applications to 1999 KW4 Timothy Holt1; David Nesvorny2; Jonathan Horner1; Alex B. Davis1; Daniel Scheeres1 Rachel King1; Brad Carter1; Leigh Brookshaw1 1 Aerospace Engineering Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder 1 Centre for Astrophysics, University of Southern Queensland (Boulder, Colorado, United States) (Longmont, Colorado, United States) 2 Southwest Research Institute (Boulder, Connecticut, United The commonly accepted formation process for asym- States) metric binary asteroids is the spin up and eventual fission of rubble pile asteroids as proposed by Walsh, Of the six recognized collisional families in the Jo- Richardson and Michel (Walsh et al., Nature 2008) vian Trojan swarms, the Eurybates family is the and Scheeres (Scheeres, Icarus 2007). In this theory largest, with over 200 recognized members. Located a rubble pile asteroid is spun up by YORP until it around the Jovian L4 Lagrange point, librations of reaches a critical spin rate and experiences a mass the members make this family an interesting study shedding event forming a close, low-eccentricity in orbital dynamics. The Jovian Trojans are thought satellite. Further work by Jacobson and Scheeres to have been captured during an early period of in- used a planar, two-ellipsoid model to analyze the stability in the Solar system. The parent body of the evolutionary pathways of such a formation event family, 3548 Eurybates is one of the targets for the from the moment the bodies initially fission (Jacob- LUCY spacecraft, and our work will provide a dy- son and Scheeres, Icarus 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Dust Particles Ejected by Catastrophic Asteroidal Disruptions
    EVOLUTION OF DUST PARTICLES EJECTED BY CATASTROPHIC ASTEROIDAL DISRUPTIONS Thomas Kehoe, Stanley Dermott, Ashley Espy Department of Astronomy, University of Florida The contribution of asteroidal dust to the zodiacal cloud has previously been discussed in terms of a collisional cascade process, whereby dust is produced by the grinding down of large objects. However, there is now evidence that debris disks, such as the zodiacal cloud, are refreshed stochastically by the injection of dust produced by the catastrophic collisional breakup of a large planetesimal. Asteroid families provide dramatic proof of the occurrence of such collisions in the solar system. There are now known to be at least two examples of asteroids, tens to hundreds of kilometers in diameter, that have been catastrophically disrupted by an impact within the last ten million years. These collisional events resulted in the creation of the Veritas family and the Karin cluster. Enormous quantities of dust are injected into the zodiacal cloud following such family-forming impact events and the remnants of the collisional debris produced by these disruptions can still be observed today in the form of dust bands. Following its production, this material evolves both dynamically and collisionally, with the result that a wave of dust particles is transported from its source region in the asteroid belt into the inner solar system Evidence shows that many asteroids are not coherent, solid bodies but are instead highly fractured, highly porous, and only loosely bound by gravity. Dust may be generated by im- pact processes in the regoliths of such ”rubble piles” and so the contribution of asteroidal dust to the zodiacal cloud may be determined by a quite different mechanism to the col- lisional cascade process, with only a few rubble piles providing the majority of asteroidal dust in the solar system at any particular epoch.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Asteroid 2002Ny40 a Rubble Pile Gravitationally Disrupted? J
    Lunar and Planetary Science XXXIX (2008) 1692.pdf IS ASTEROID 2002NY40 A RUBBLE PILE GRAVITATIONALLY DISRUPTED? J. M. Trigo-Rodríguez1,2, W.F. Bottke3, A. Campo Bagatin4, P. Tanga5, J. Llorca6, D.C. Jones7, I.P. Williams7, J.M. Madiedo8, and E. Lyytinen9. 1Institute of Space Sciences (CSIC). Campus UAB, Facultat de Ciències, Torre C5-2ª planta. 08193 Bellaterra, Spain; 2Institut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya. Gran Capità 2-4, Ed. Nexus. 08034 Bar- celona, Spain; 3 Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, Colorado, USA; 4 Universidad de Alicante, Spain; 5 Obser- vatoire de Nice, France; 6 Institut de Tècniques Energètiques, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Barce- lona; 7 Astronomy Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; 8 Facultad de Ciencias, Uni- versidad de Huelva, Spain; 9 Finish Fireball Network, Kehäkukantie 3B, 00720 Helsinki, Finland. Introduction: The existence of meteoroid streams Results and discussion: Due to the relative low containing meter-sized meteoroids capable of produc- population of the NEO region, a collision among as- ing meteorites after atmospheric interaction was pro- teroids is an unlikely, but not negligible process for posed quite recently [1]. Their existence has important producing the observed asteroidal fragments. In any implications because they can be naturally delivering case, we have searched for alternative processes capa- to the Earth different types of rock-forming materials ble of producing the meteoroid stream. a) One option from Potentially Hazardous Asteroids (PHA). would be that the meteoroids were ejected by a fast rotator, unlikely according to the present spin of both The recent identification of Near Earth Object asteroids, but not taking into account the YORP effect.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Solar System Bodies As Granular Media D
    Small Solar System Bodies as granular media D. Hestroffer, P. Sanchez, L Staron, A. Campo Bagatin, S. Eggl, W. Losert, N. Murdoch, E. Opsomer, F. Radjai, D. C. Richardson, et al. To cite this version: D. Hestroffer, P. Sanchez, L Staron, A. Campo Bagatin, S. Eggl, et al.. Small Solar System Bodiesas granular media. Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, Springer Verlag, 2019, 27 (1), 10.1007/s00159- 019-0117-5. hal-02342853 HAL Id: hal-02342853 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02342853 Submitted on 4 Nov 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Astron Astrophys Rev manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Small solar system bodies as granular media D. Hestroffer · P. S´anchez · L. Staron · A. Campo Bagatin · S. Eggl · W. Losert · N. Murdoch · E. Opsomer · F. Radjai · D. C. Richardson · M. Salazar · D. J. Scheeres · S. Schwartz · N. Taberlet · H. Yano Received: date / Accepted: date Made possible by the International Space Science Institute (ISSI, Bern) support to the inter- national team \Asteroids & Self Gravitating Bodies as Granular Systems" D. Hestroffer IMCCE, Paris Observatory, universit´ePSL, CNRS, Sorbonne Universit´e,Univ.
    [Show full text]
  • The Physical Propermes of Near Earth Asteroids
    The Physical Properes of Near Earth Asteroids Dan Bri University of Central Florida What Do We Need to Know About NEA Physical Proper/es? • Asteroid Structure – Rubble pile? – Coherent object? • Material Strength – Tough? Weak? • Mineralogy • Thermal Properes • Surface texture – Dusty regolith? – Boulder field? Sources of Data • Meteorites – Strong? Weak? • Observaons of Bolides • Meteorite Strewnfields • Observaons of NEAs – Rota/on rates – Binaries • Physics – Microgravity – Cohesion – Thermal cycles Lets Start with Meteorites Meteorite Types • Chondrites (ordinary, enstatite) – Stones, chondrules, olivine, pyroxene, metal, sulfides, usually strong • Volatile-rich Carbonaceous Chondrites (CI, CM) Farmington (L5) Farmville (H4) – Hydrated silicates, carbon compounds, refractory grains, very weak. • Other Carbonaceous (CO, CV, CK, CR, CH) – Highly variable, chondules, refractory grains, often as strong as ordinary Allende (CV3) chondrites • Achondrites – Igneous rocks from partial melts or melt residues Bununu (Howardite) • Irons – Almost all FeNi metal Thiel Mountains (pallasite) • Stony-irons Cape York (IIIAB) – Mix of silicates and metal Meteorite Density Meteorite Compressive Strength Material Meteorite Type Compressive Strength (MPa) Concrete (Unreinforced) Typical Sidewalk 20 (3000 psi) Charcoal Briquee ~2 Granite 100–140 Medium dirt clod 0.2-0.4 La Lande, NM L5 373.4 Tsarev L5 160-420 Covert (porosity 13%) H5 75.3 Krymka LL3 160 Seminole H4 173 Holbrook, AZ (porosity 11%) L6 6.2 Tagish Lake C2 0.25-1.2 Murchison CM ~50 Bolides ? 0.1-1
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical and Probabilistic Analysis of Asteroid and Comet Impact Hazard Mitigation Catherine S. Plesko Los Alamos National Labo
    Numerical and Probabilistic Analysis of Asteroid and Comet Impact Hazard Mitigation Catherine S. Plesko Los Alamos National Laboratory Robert P. Weaver Los Alamos National Laboratory Walter F. Huebner Southwest Research Institute ABSTRACT The possibility of asteroid and comet nucleus impacts on Earth has received significant recent media and scientific attention. Still, there are many outstanding questions about the correct response once a potentially hazardous object (PHO) is found. Nuclear explosives are often suggested as a deflection mechanism because they have a high internal energy per unit launch mass. However, major uncertainties remain about the use of nuclear explosives for hazard mitigation. There are large uncertainties in a PHO’s physical response to a strong deflection or dispersion impulse like that delivered by nuclear munitions. Objects smaller than 100 m may be solid, and objects at all sizes may be “rubble piles” with large porosities and little strength [1]. Objects with these different properties would respond very differently, so the effects of object properties must be accounted for. Recent ground-based observations and missions to asteroids and comets have improved the planetary science community’s understanding of these objects. Computational power and simulation capabilities have improved to such an extent that it is possible to numerically model the hazard mitigation problem from first principles. Before we know that explosive yield Y at height h or depth -h from the target surface will produce a momentum change in or dispersion of a PHO, we must quantify the energy deposition into the system of particles that make up the PHO. Here we present the initial results of a parameter study in which we model the efficiency of energy deposition from a stand-off nuclear burst onto targets made of PHO constituent materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Photometric Lightcurves of Transneptunian Objects and Centaurs: Rotations, Shapes, and Densities
    Sheppard et al.: Photometric Lightcurves 129 Photometric Lightcurves of Transneptunian Objects and Centaurs: Rotations, Shapes, and Densities Scott S. Sheppard Carnegie Institution of Washington Pedro Lacerda Grupo de Astrofisica da Universidade de Coimbra Jose L. Ortiz Instituto de Astrofisica de Andalucia We discuss the transneptunian objects and Centaur rotations, shapes, and densities as deter- mined through analyzing observations of their short-term photometric lightcurves. The light- curves are found to be produced by various different mechanisms including rotational albedo variations, elongation from extremely high angular momentum, as well as possible eclipsing or contact binaries. The known rotations are from a few hours to several days with the vast majority having periods around 8.5 h, which appears to be significantly slower than the main- belt asteroids of similar size. The photometric ranges have been found to be near zero to over 1.1 mag. Assuming the elongated, high-angular-momentum objects are relatively strengthless, we find most Kuiper belt objects appear to have very low densities (<1000 kg m–3) indicating high volatile content with significant porosity. The smaller objects appear to be more elongated, which is evidence of material strength becoming more important than self-compression. The large amount of angular momentum observed in the Kuiper belt suggests a much more numer- ous population of large objects in the distant past. In addition we review the various methods for determining periods from lightcurve datasets, including phase dispersion minimization (PDM), the Lomb periodogram, the Window CLEAN algorithm, the String method, and the Harris Fourier analysis method. 1. INTRODUCTION show the primordial distribution of angular momenta ob- tained through the accretion process while the smaller ob- The transneptunian objects (TNOs) are a remnant from jects may allow us to understand collisional breakup of the original protoplanetary disk.
    [Show full text]
  • Studying the Surface of Asteroids by Investigating Powder in the Lab
    Studying the Surface of Asteroids by Investigating Powder in the Lab Dr Daniel D Durda STUDYING THE SURFACE OF ASTEROIDS BY INVESTIGATING POWDER IN THE LAB Space scientist Dr Dan Durda and his team at the Southwest Research Institute in Boulder, Colorado, are working to understand how the planets in our Solar System evolved. The team is searching for practical ways to exploit nearby asteroids, through investigating how materials on their surfaces act in microgravity. CREDIT: JAXA Hayabusa mission to Itokawa, ©JAXA what asteroids really look like? Actually, no. Information provided by spacecraft launched in the last few decades has told us that asteroids are not simply naked masses of rock. For example, the spacecraft Near Earth Asteroid Rendezvous-Shoemaker (NEAR-Shoemaker) was launched in 1996 from Cape Canaveral, Florida, the first such mission intended to study an asteroid close up. After a flyby of the main-belt asteroid 253 Mathilde, in 2001, NEAR-Shoemaker orbited and actually landed on an asteroid called 433 Eros – the second largest near-Earth asteroid with a diameter of Itokawa, CREDIT: ISAS, JAXA ©JAXA almost 17 km. Images of Eros show that it is not simply a mass of bare rock – it is covered We are not alone in our planetary how our own planet evolved. According to at least partially with loose layers of gravel and neighbourhood. Scientists currently estimate Dr Dan Durda of the Southwest Research dust, formed as a result of meteor impacts and that there are almost 17 thousand near-Earth Institute in Boulder, Colorado, near-Earth other space weathering effects.
    [Show full text]
  • The Science of Sungrazers, Sunskirters, and Other Near-Sun Comets
    Space Sci Rev (2018) 214:20 DOI 10.1007/s11214-017-0446-5 The Science of Sungrazers, Sunskirters, and Other Near-Sun Comets Geraint H. Jones1,2 · Matthew M. Knight3,4 · Karl Battams5 · Daniel C. Boice6,7,8 · John Brown9 · Silvio Giordano10 · John Raymond11 · Colin Snodgrass12,13 · Jordan K. Steckloff14,15,16 · Paul Weissman14 · Alan Fitzsimmons17 · Carey Lisse18 · Cyrielle Opitom19,20 · Kimberley S. Birkett1,2,21 · Maciej Bzowski22 · Alice Decock19,23 · Ingrid Mann24,25 · Yudish Ramanjooloo1,2,26 · Patrick McCauley11 Received: 1 March 2017 / Accepted: 15 November 2017 © The Author(s) 2017. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract This review addresses our current understanding of comets that venture close to the Sun, and are hence exposed to much more extreme conditions than comets that are typ- ically studied from Earth. The extreme solar heating and plasma environments that these objects encounter change many aspects of their behaviour, thus yielding valuable informa- tion on both the comets themselves that complements other data we have on primitive solar system bodies, as well as on the near-solar environment which they traverse. We propose clear definitions for these comets: We use the term near-Sun comets to encompass all ob- B G.H. Jones [email protected] 1 Mullard Space Science Laboratory, University College London, Holmbury St. Mary, Dorking, UK 2 The Centre for Planetary Sciences at UCL/Birkbeck, London, UK 3 University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA 4 Lowell Observatory, Flagstaff, AZ, USA
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Th E Ro Tatio Nal P Ro P Erties
    The Shapes and Spins of Kuiper Belt Objects Lacerda, Pedro Citation Lacerda, P. (2005, February 17). The Shapes and Spins of Kuiper Belt Objects. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/603 Version: Corrected Publisher’s Version Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the License: Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/603 Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable). CHAPTER 4 Analysis o f th e ro tatio nal p ro p e rtie s ABSTRAC T We u se optical data of 10 K u iper B elt objects (K B O s) to in vestig ate their rotation al properties. O f the 10, three (3 0% ) ex hibit lig ht variation s with am plitu de ¢m ¸ 0:15 m ag , an d 1 ou t of 10 (10% ) has ¢m ¸ 0:4 0 m ag , which is in g ood ag reem en t with previou s su rveys. T hese data, in com - bin ation with the ex istin g database, are u sed to discu ss the rotation al periods, shapes, an d den sities of K u iper B elt objects. We ¯ n d that, in the sam pled size ran g e, K u iper B elt objects have a hig her fraction of low am - plitu de lig htcu rves an d rotate slower than m ain belt asteroids. T he data also show that the rotation al properties an d the shapes of K B O s depen d on size.
    [Show full text]