Guide for Pesticide Solubility
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
ERMA200695 E and R Report
ERMA New Zealand Evaluation and Review Report Application for approval to import or manufacture ParaMite Selective Miticide for release Application Number: ERMA200695 Executive Summary Background information Sumitomo Chemical Australia Pty Ltd is seeking approval to import or manufacture ParaMite Selective Miticide for release. ParaMite Selective Miticide is a soluble concentrate containing 110 g/litre etoxazole and other ingredients. ParaMite Selective Miticide is intended for the control of Six-Spotted Mites in avocados. ParaMite Selective Miticide will be applied by ground-based methods only, at a maximum application rate of 1.05 L/ha (121.6 g ai/ha), 1 time per year. Etoxazole is a new active ingredient to New Zealand. Classification The Agency has classified ParaMite Selective Miticide based on the composition of ParaMite Selective Miticide and the effects of its components. Hazardous Property Assessment Target Organ Toxicity 6.9A Aquatic Ecotoxicity 9.1A Risk Assessment The Agency‘s assessment of the risks posed by ParaMite Selective Miticide to the environment and to human health, during the substance‘s lifecycle, is based on qualitative assessment and quantitative modelling using the GENEEC2 and German BBA models. The Agency considers that the risk assessments indicate that the risks to human health and the environment posed by ParaMite Selective Miticide are negligible with the proposed controls in place. The Agency has evaluated information supplied by the applicant about the benefits of ParaMite Selective Miticide and considers -
Certificate of Analysis
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS IDENTIFICATION: Page 1 of 3 PRODUCT NAME: XJ-13 PRODUCT DESIGNATION: Proprietary Strain Terpene Blend Profile SKU #: GCS-XJ13 INTENDED FOR USE BY: December 2021 LOT #: GCT10060 CAS #: Mixture EC #: Mixture PARAMETER: SPECIFICATION: RESULTS: APPEARANCE: Clear, Light Yellow Liquid Clear, Light Yellow Liquid ODOR: Citrus, Pine & Pungent Citrus, Pine & Pungent ADDITIONAL PRODUCT INFORMATION: Storage Conditions: Stable when stored in its original container securely tightened and away from heat, open flames, sunlight, combustible materials and hot surfaces. Store in a cool, dry, and well-ventilated place. TRACE CONTAMINANT LEVELS: Test Type: Heavy Metals Contaminant Name Max. Allowed (ppm) Test Result Contaminant Name Max. Allowed (ppm) Test Result Arsenic 0.2 PASSED Cadmium 0.2 PASSED Lead 0.5 PASSED Mercury 0.1 PASSED Test Type: Pesticide Contaminant Name Max. Allowed (ppm) Test Result Contaminant Name Max. Allowed (ppm) Test Result Abamectin 0.07 PASSED Acephate 0.1 PASSED Acequinocyl 0.1 PASSED Acetamiprid 0.1 PASSED Aldicarb 0.4 PASSED Azoxystrobin 0.02 PASSED Bifenazate 0.02 PASSED Bifenthrin 0.1 PASSED Boscalid 0.1 PASSED Captan 0.7 PASSED Gold Coast Terpenes LLC // 1201 N Catalina Ave. PO Box 3435, Redondo Beach, CA 90277 goldcoastterpenes.com // [email protected] // 929-356-6086 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Test Type: Pesticide (Continued) Page 2 of 3 Contaminant Name Max. Allowed (ppm) Test Result Contaminant Name Max. Allowed (ppm) Test Result Carbaryl 0.2 PASSED Carbofuran 0.2 PASSED Chlorantraniliprole -
Determination of Etoxazole Residues in Fruits and Vegetables by SPE Clean
This article was downloaded by: [Enstinet], [Farag Malhat] On: 25 February 2013, At: 03:14 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B: Pesticides, Food Contaminants, and Agricultural Wastes Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/lesb20 Determination of etoxazole residues in fruits and vegetables by SPE clean-up and HPLC-DAD Farag Malhat a , Hany Badawy b , Dalia Barakat b & Ayman Saber a a Pesticide Residues and Environmental Pollution Department, Agriculture Research Center, Dokki, Giza, Egypt b Pesticides & Economic Insect Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt To cite this article: Farag Malhat , Hany Badawy , Dalia Barakat & Ayman Saber (2013): Determination of etoxazole residues in fruits and vegetables by SPE clean-up and HPLC-DAD, Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B: Pesticides, Food Contaminants, and Agricultural Wastes, 48:5, 331-335 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2013.742371 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. -
Certificate of Analysis
Certificate of Analysis Reported: September 10, 2020 885 Walnut St. Suite B Macon, GA 31201 License #: PHRS001078 Product Name: THC Free 2000 mg Matrix: Tincture Sample Size: 4 oz Received: 09/01/2020 Sample ID: SAM-090120-218 Distributor or Microbusiness: Name: Green Acres Organic Pharms Inc. Premises Address: 3115 Northington Court Florence, Al 35630 License No.: Potency Date of Analysis: 09/03/2020 Method: HPLC Analyte LOQ (%) Results (%) Results (mg/g) Results (mg/mL) CBD 0.05 1.90 19.01 16.54 CBDV 0.05 ND ND ND CBDA 0.05 0.10 0.98 0.85 CBC 0.05 <LOQ 0.12 0.10 CBCA 0.05 0.07 0.71 0.61 CBG 0.05 ND ND ND CBGA 0.05 ND ND ND CBN 0.05 ND ND ND Δ9-THC 0.05 ND ND ND Δ8-THC 0.05 ND ND ND THCA 0.05 ND ND ND Moisture Total THC: Total CBD: Total CBG: % % mg/g % mg/g % mg/g ND ND ND 1.99 19.87 ND ND Page 1 of 3 Residual Solvents Date of Analysis: 09/09/2020 Method: GC/MS headspace Analyte LOQ (ppm) Results (ppm) Carbon-Tetrachloride 10.00 ND Methanol 10.00 ND Pentane 10.00 ND Ethanol 10.00 ND Acetone 10.00 ND Isopropanol 10.00 ND Acetonitrile 10.00 ND n-Hexane 10.00 ND Chloroform 10.00 ND Benzene 10.00 ND Heptane 10.00 ND Tetrahydrofuran 10.00 ND Toluene 10.00 ND Xylene (meta-, para-) 10.00 ND Xylene (ortho-) 10.00 ND Heavy Metals Date of Analysis: 09/10/2020 Method: ICP/MS Analyte LOQ (ppm) Results (ppm) Cadmium 10.00 ND Lead 10.00 ND Arsenic 10.00 ND Mercury 10.00 ND Pesticides Date of Analysis: 09/03/2020 Method: LC/MS/MS Analyte LOQ (ppb) Results (ppb) Status Aldicarb 100.00 ND Pass Carbofuran 100.00 ND Pass Dimethoate 100.00 ND Pass Ethoprophos -
Certificate of Analysis CO2 Extract
Certificate of Analysis EVIO Labs Eugene 1686 Pearl Street, Eugene, OR 97401 541-505-9193 / OLCC 010-10035420314 / www.EVIOLabs.com CO2 Extract Date Sampled: 04/02/18 09:00 Date Accepted: 04/02/18 Octo Consulting Results Valid Until: 04/02/19 AG-R1044757IHH Batch ID: B2018RF1 Sample ID: E180164-01 METRC Batch #: n/a Batch Size: 6991 g Matrix: Extract/Concentrate Sampling Method/SOP: SOP.T.20.010 Pesticides Date/Time Extracted: 04/04/18 09:05 Date/Time Analyzed: 4/6/2018 5:04:52AM Analysis Method/SOP: SOP.T.30.060 Analyte LOQ Action Level Result Field Dup Result Units Type Abamectin 0.250 0.5 < LOQ < LOQ ppm Acephate 0.200 0.4 < LOQ < LOQ ppm Organophosphate insecticide Acequinocyl 1.00 2 < LOQ < LOQ ppm Acetamiprid 0.200 0.2 < LOQ < LOQ ppm Neonicotinoid instecticide Aldicarb 0.200 0.4 < LOQ < LOQ ppm Carbamate insecticide Azoxystrobin 0.200 0.2 < LOQ < LOQ ppm Bifenazate 0.200 0.2 < LOQ < LOQ ppm Unclassified insecticide Bifenthrin 0.200 0.2 < LOQ < LOQ ppm Boscalid 0.200 0.4 < LOQ < LOQ ppm Anilide fungicide Carbaryl 0.200 0.2 < LOQ < LOQ ppm Carbamate insecticide Carbofuran 0.200 0.2 < LOQ < LOQ ppm Carbamate insecticide Chlorantraniliprole 0.200 0.2 < LOQ < LOQ ppm Anthranilic diamide insecticide Chlorfenapyr 0.500 1 < LOQ < LOQ ppm Pyrazole insecticide Chlorpyrifos 0.200 0.2 < LOQ < LOQ ppm Organophosphate insecticide Clofentezine 0.200 0.2 < LOQ < LOQ ppm Cyfluthrin 0.500 1 < LOQ < LOQ ppm Cypermethrin 0.500 1 < LOQ < LOQ ppm Daminozide 0.500 1 < LOQ < LOQ ppm DDVP (Dichlorvos) 0.500 1 < LOQ < LOQ ppm Diazinon 0.200 0.2 < LOQ < -
Pressurized Solvent Extraction with Ethyl Acetate and Liquid Chromatography—Tandem Mass Spectrometry for the Analysis of Selected Conazole Fungicides in Matcha
toxics Article Pressurized Solvent Extraction with Ethyl Acetate and Liquid Chromatography—Tandem Mass Spectrometry for the Analysis of Selected Conazole Fungicides in Matcha Renata Raina-Fulton * and Aisha A. Mohamad Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Trace Analysis Facility, University of Regina; 3737 Wascana Parkway, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-306-585-4012; Fax: +1-306-337-2409 Received: 30 September 2018; Accepted: 23 October 2018; Published: 25 October 2018 Abstract: The extraction of powdered nutraceuticals is challenging due to the low water content and high concentration of matrix components that can lead to significant matrix effects in liquid chromatography-positive ion electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI+-MS/MS). In this study we assess the feasibility of using pressurized solvent extraction with ethyl acetate to reduce the co-extraction of polar matrix components. Pigment attributed to chlorophyll was removed with in-cell clean-up utilizing Anasorb 747, Florisil®, and C18. Visible inspection of the extracts showed that pigment was removed from matcha, a powdered green tea sample. Pressurized solvent extraction with in-cell clean-up can be utilized to remove pigments from powdered samples such as nutraceuticals. Average matrix effect of the 32 target analytes that observed mass spectrometric signal suppression or soft MS signal enhancement was −41 ± 19% with the majority of analytes having a protonated molecular ion with m/z of 250 to 412. As generally moderate signal suppression was observed for conazole fungicides and structurally related compounds analyzed by LC-ESI+-MS/MS, it is recommended that matrix matched or standard addition calibration is used for quantitation. -
Standards for Cannabis Testing
Standards for Cannabis Testing Cannabis Standards AccuStandard offers a comprehensive list of standards for testing the quality and safety of cannabis and hemp products for both medicinal and recreational purposes. Standards for testing includes pesticides, residual solvents, terpenes (for strain and flavor profiling), heavy metals, and active cannabinoid compounds. Visit our website for the latest cannabis updates https://www.accustandard.com/cannabis-standards Contents Cannabinoids 1 Cannabis Terpenes 1 Hemp 1 Cannabis State Methods 2-4 California Residual Pesticides & Solvents 2 Colorado Residual Pesticides 2 Florida Pesticides 2 Maryland Residual Pesticides 3 Massachusetts Residual Pesticides 3 Nevada Pesticides 3 Oregon Residual Pesticides & Solvents 3-4 Pennsylvania Pesticides 4 Heavy Metals As, Cd, Cr, Pb, Hg, Ni, Tl 4 Canada Residual Pesticides & Solvents 5 17034, 17025, and 9001:2015 © AccuStandard, Inc. 2021 AccuStandard is an ISO accredited Reference Material Producer Cannabis Standards Cannabinoids Cannabis Terpenes SOLUTIONS at 1000 µg/mL in PT Methanol SOLUTIONS at 100 µg/mL in PT Methanol Compound CAS Cat. No. Unit Compound CAS Cat. No. Unit Cannabidiol (CBD) 13956-29-1 CP-CBD-01S 1 mL (−)-alpha-Bisabolol 23089-26-1 CP-TER-001S 1 mL Delta-8-Tetrahydrocannabinol 5957-75-5 CP-8-THC-01S 1 mL beta-Pinene 18172-67-3 CP-TER-002S 1 mL (THC-8) (−)-Borneol 464-45-9 CP-TER-003S 1 mL Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol 1972-08-3 CP-9-THC-01S 1 mL (−)-Caryophyllene oxide 1139-30-6 CP-TER-004S 1 mL (THC-9) (−)-Guaiol 489-86-1 CP-TER-005S 1 mL Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinolic 23978-85-0 CP-THCA-A-01S 1 mL (−)-Isopulegol 89-79-1 CP-TER-006S 1 mL acid A (THCA-A) (+)-Borneol 464-43-7 CP-TER-007S 1 mL Cannabigerol (CBG) 25654-31-3 CP-CBG-01S 1 mL (+)-Fenchone 4695-62-9 CP-TER-008S 1 mL Cannabichromene (CBC) 20675-51-8 CP-CBC-01S 1 mL Eucalyptol 470-82-6 CP-TER-009S 1 mL alpha-Humulene 6753-98-6 CP-TER-010S 1 mL alpha-Pinene 80-56-8 CP-TER-011S 1 mL Restrictions may apply, contact us for information. -
Methods of Analysis-Determination of Pesticides in Sediment Using Gas
Methods of Analysis—Determination of Pesticides in Sediment Using Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Methods 5–C3 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Methods of Analysis—Determination of Pesticides in Sediment Using Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry By Michelle L. Hladik and Megan M. McWayne Techniques and Methods 5–C3 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Hladik, M.L., and McWayne, M.M., 2012, Methods of analysis—Determination of pesticides in sediment using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods 5–C3, 18 p. Available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/tm5c3. iii Contents Abstract -
Acenaphthene 83-32-9 5000 N 45000 N 100000 L 110 N 530 N Acephate 30560-19-1 110 N 980 N 2100 N 0.11 N 24 N Acetaldehyde 75-07-0
Table A-6: 2021 Screening Levels Soil Exposure Ground Water Vapor Exposure Chemical Direct Contact Soil MTG Tap Ground Water Indoor Air Residential Com/Ind Excavation Residential Residential Residential Com/Industrial Residential Com/Ind Name CASRN (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) Acenaphthene 83-32-9 5000 N 45000 N 100000 L 110 N 530 N Acephate 30560-19-1 110 N 980 N 2100 N 0.11 N 24 N Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 110 N 340 N 1900 N 0.077 N 19 N 9.4 N 39 N Acetochlor 34256-82-1 1800 N 16000 N 34000 N 5.6 N 350 N Acetone 67-64-1 85000 N 100000 L 100000 L 57 N 14000 N 32000 N 140000 N Acetone Cyanohydrin 75-86-5 100000 L 100000 L 100000 L 2.1 N 8.8 N Acetonitrile 75-05-8 1100 N 3400 N 19000 N 0.54 N 130 N 63 N 260 N Acetophenone 98-86-2 2500 S 2500 S 2500 S 12 N 1900 N Acetylaminofluorene, 2- 53-96-3 2 C 6 C 320 C 0.015 C 0.16 C 0.022 C 0.094 C Acrolein 107-02-8 0.2 N 0.6 N 3.4 N 0.00017 N 0.042 N 0.021 N 0.088 N Acrylamide 79-06-1 3.4 C 46 C 2400 C 0.0021 C 0.5 C 0.1 C 1.2 C Acrylic Acid 79-10-7 140 N 420 N 2300 N 0.0085 N 2.1 N 1 N 4.4 N Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 3.5 C 11 C 370 N 0.0023 C 0.52 C 0.41 C 1.8 C Adiponitrile 111-69-3 100000 L 100000 L 100000 L 6.3 N 26 N Alachlor 15972-60-8 140 C 410 C 18000 N 0.033 M 2 M Aldicarb 116-06-3 88 N 820 N 1800 N 0.015 M 3 M Aldicarb Sulfone 1646-88-4 88 N 820 N 1800 N 0.0088 M 2 M Aldicarb sulfoxide 1646-87-3 0.018 M 4 M Aldrin 309-00-2 0.55 C 1.8 C 59 N 0.03 C 0.0092 C 0.0057 C 0.025 C Allyl Alcohol 107-18-6 4.9 N 15 N 83 N 0.00086 N 0.21 N 0.1 N 0.44 N Allyl Chloride -
Analytical Data for Agricultural Chemicals As Water Quality Control Target Setting Items 1 Application No.16 Note
LAAN-C-XX-E014 Application Analytical Data for Agricultural Chemicals as Note Water Quality Control Target Setting Items K.Tanaka, T.Kondo, T.Hoshi, M.Kobayashi, K.Nakagawa No.16 Environment 1. Introduction To protect the quality of water essential to humans, drinking water been continuously gathered. quality standards have been established. Current water quality standards This document is a collection of analytical data with respect to water in Japan were significantly revised in 2003. Water quality standards based quality control target setting items for 15 agricultural chemicals (102 on Ordinance 4 of Japan's Water Supply Act are specified according to components). Analyzing multiple types of agricultural chemicals requires "Ministerial Ordinance Concerning Water Quality Standards" (Ministry experience and technical ability. It describes key considerations for of Health, Labour and Welfare Ordinance No. 101, May 30, 2003 [Final preparing reagents, pretreating samples, and setting parameters for revision, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Ordinance 18, February analytical instruments. 17, 2010] ). In addition to water quality standards, items that require considerations for water quality control are specified as water quality control target setting items. Necessary information and knowledge of these items have Reference URL for Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare 1) Drinking water information: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/topics/bukyoku/kenkou/suido/index.html Analytical & Measuring Instruments Division Analytical Data for Agricultural -
Exhibit a OAR 333-007-0400: Table 3. Pesticide Analytes and Their
Exhibit A Chemical Abstract Action OAR 333-007-0400: Table 3. Pesticide Services Analyte Level analytes and their action levels (CAS) ppm Chemical Registry Abstract Number Action Services Etofenprox Analyte Level 80844-07-1 0.4 (CAS) ppm Etoxazole Registry 153233-91-1 0.2 Number Fenoxycarb 72490-01-8 0.2 Abamectin 71751-41-2 0.5 Fenpyroximate 134098-61-6 0.4 Acephate 30560-19-1 0.4 Fipronil 120068-37-3 0.4 Acequinocyl 57960-19-7 2 Flonicamid 158062-67-0 1 Acetamiprid 135410-20-7 0.2 Fludioxonil 131341-86-1 0.4 Aldicarb 116-06-3 0.4 Hexythiazox 78587-05-0 1 Azoxystrobin 131860-33-8 0.2 Imazalil 35554-44-0 0.2 Bifenazate 149877-41-8 0.2 Imidacloprid 138261-41-3 0.4 Bifenthrin 82657-04-3 0.2 Kresoxim-methyl 143390-89-0 0.4 Boscalid 188425-85-6 0.4 Malathion 121-75-5 0.2 Carbaryl 63-25-2 0.2 Metalaxyl 57837-19-1 0.2 Carbofuran 1563-66-2 0.2 Methiocarb 2032-65-7 0.2 Chlorantraniliprole 500008-45-7 0.2 Methomyl 16752-77-5 0.4 Chlorfenapyr 122453-73-0 1 Methyl parathion 298-00-0 0.2 Chlorpyrifos 2921-88-2 0.2 MGK-264 113-48-4 0.2 Clofentezine 74115-24-5 0.2 Myclobutanil 88671-89-0 0.2 Cyfluthrin 68359-37-5 1 Naled 300-76-5 0.5 Cypermethrin 52315-07-8 1 Oxamyl 23135-22-0 1 Daminozide 1596-84-5 1 Paclobutrazol 76738-62-0 0.4 DDVP 62-73-7 1 (Dichlorvos) 1 Permethrins 52645-53-1 0.2 Diazinon 333-41-5 0.2 Phosmet 732-11-6 0.2 Dimethoate 60-51-5 0.2 Piperonyl_butoxide 51-03-6 2 Ethoprophos 13194-48-4 0.2 Prallethrin 23031-36-9 0.2 1 Permethrins should be measured as cumulative residue of cis- and trans-permethrin isomers (CAS numbers 54774-45-7 and 51877-74-8 respectively). -
Identifying and Prioritizing Chemicals with Uncertain Burden of Exposure: Opportunities for Biomonitoring and Health-Related Research
UCSF UC San Francisco Previously Published Works Title Identifying and Prioritizing Chemicals with Uncertain Burden of Exposure: Opportunities for Biomonitoring and Health-Related Research. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/341329w1 Journal Environmental health perspectives, 127(12) ISSN 0091-6765 Authors Pellizzari, Edo D Woodruff, Tracey J Boyles, Rebecca R et al. Publication Date 2019-12-18 DOI 10.1289/ehp5133 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California A Section 508–conformant HTML version of this article Review is available at https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP5133. Identifying and Prioritizing Chemicals with Uncertain Burden of Exposure: Opportunities for Biomonitoring and Health-Related Research Edo D. Pellizzari,1 Tracey J. Woodruff,2 Rebecca R. Boyles,3 Kurunthachalam Kannan,4 Paloma I. Beamer,5 Jessie P. Buckley,6 Aolin Wang,2 Yeyi Zhu,7,8 and Deborah H. Bennett9 (Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes) 1Fellow Program, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA 2Program on Reproductive Health and the Environment, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA 3Bioinformatics and Data Science, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA 4Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, USA 5Department of Community, Environment and Policy, Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona,