DOCSLIB.ORG

Response to Comments on Silver Spring to Glenmont Bikeway

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Response to Comments on Silver Spring to Glenmont Bikeway Response to Comments on Silver Spring to Glenmont Bikeway CAG Member Page Comment Response Dennis The plan should indicate that over the long term there should Agreed. This was our intent but in rereading the introduction it be trails paralleling Georgia Avenue on both sides, both east is clear that this was not stated. and west. Dennis As there will likely be insufficient funds for some time to do Agreed. both, safe bike/ped crossings at every intersection on Georgia that has a traffic light should be a high priority. Dennis Suggest the Red route be modified and improved along the We agree with these comments and plan to incorporate them following lines: into our draft bikeway recommendations. 1. retain the northern section from Glenmont Metro south as far as Plyers Mill. This avoids the problems with the Wheaton CBD which may be surmountable someday, but not readily at this time. 2. Have the Red route continue along the route of the Green route east of Georgia Ave. from Plyers Mill to Forest Glen Road. This provides a safe, simple and relatively flat route without the complications and step hill that make this stretch of proposed Red line less desirable. 3. The Red route should cross Georgia at Forest Glen taking advantage of the safe bike/ped crossing that should be there. This eliminates the costly building of a new pike/ped bridge over the Beltway that the (proposed) Green line would require and allows the route to take advantage of the existing bike/ped bridge along Georgia Avenue that the proposed Blue and Red routes enjoy. 4. The Red line would then continue south as proposed. Shaded cell indicates discussion point. Page 1 of 13 Response to Comments on Silver Spring to Glenmont Bikeway CAG Member Page Comment Response Dennis In the interest of building a better route (some day) along the We have no objections, however, I believe a separated western side of Georgia, I suggest that a small group of bike bikeway may attract more users. advocates meet with the management of the Westfield Wheaton Mall to discuss the possibility of having a Conventional Bike Lane along the eastern perimeter of the Mall. This could be the hardest nut to crack in devising a continuous western route. We should argue that the use of the bikes racks at the Mall indicates that customers do want to bike to the Mall for shopping and recreation, and that the provision of a perimeter bike land would both be good for public relations and bring more customers without more cars. Dewey Of the four options, I like the Eastside route the best due to Okay. the additional I495 crossing and the directness of the route. The other three options seemed to either have arduous hills and many turns, both of which would discourage many riders. Gray I would suggest some changes as follows to the route, mainly This concept plan is intended as a route that can be to have fewer turns in a route that has way too many IMHO. implemented in the short term. This recommendation would Once on Amherst, continue all the way to Evans, which means require a new traffic signal at the intersection of Georgia Ave going through the park there. Head left/west to Gardiner, & Evans Parkway, which could take a long time to implement. which already is partly marked as a bike route. Take Gardiner to its end, go left/east on Kimball Pl to go right/south to Darcy While a route along Gardiner Ave requires a few less turns, we to FG road to GA. Continue on GA to a much easier right onto did not recommend it because there is a greater grade change Locust as opposed to a 35 degree right onto Landsdowne. and it is slightly longer. Take Locust west to 2d and continue the rest of the way on 2d etc... Shaded cell indicates discussion point. Page 2 of 13 Response to Comments on Silver Spring to Glenmont Bikeway CAG Member Page Comment Response Gray I like most of Paul's comments (below), but some are Okay. unnecessary if you follow the route I suggest. I have not made specific suggestions for going on Amherst a few more blocks and for Evans and Gardiner, but making them Greenways alone would make the lack of several turns much easier and more pleasant for many cyclists. Gray I like a lot of the amenities you are making on the Greenway. Thanks. Punga Andrew P: Would the Eastside route actually go through the This options would travel along Georgia Ave until the medical medical complex at Dennis? The concern there (at the time) center redeveloped. was that unless the owner gave an easement it just forces bike traffic back onto the sidewalk on Georgia going the wrong way. Also does Eastside have a dedicated beltway overpass? The current pedestrian bridge at the Beltway is less than ideal for Northbound bike traffic. Punga Andrew P: I doubt anyone is going to bother with the 2nd ave Disagree -- I would expect most people travel along only part alignment, its way to twisty and crosses Georgia too often to of the route and many would not need to cross Georgia Ave at be useful. all. Punga Dan L: Eastside route from Blueridge to Forest Glen with Thanks. easement through the complex at Dennis would be great, even if it required using the existing pedestrian bridge at the beltway the near term, then continue on 2nd street. Shaded cell indicates discussion point. Page 3 of 13 Response to Comments on Silver Spring to Glenmont Bikeway CAG Member Page Comment Response Punga Eleanor A: One of the disadvantages listed for the Eastside The proposed alignments would be a more direct connection route is that 2 blocks of Woodside Dr. are one-way. Just a note between Silver Spring and Wheaton, would include lighting, that 5 blocks of Grandview Ave. along the proposed routes are and would be constructed to current standards. also one-way. I have to ask: why is Sligo Creek not part of any of the options? It’s what I always use to get from Wheaton to Silver Spring. It’s pleasant, relatively flat, safe from traffic, and would require less development (and $) than the other options. Punga Siah A.: I would suggest considering the new library/rec center This will be considered as part of the Bicycle Master Plan. in planning--crossing Georgia at that intersection is a nightmare as drivers seem to treat it as an opportunity to make up time lost at more congested spots. Punga Mary S: Limiting the left turn from Blueridge onto GA is not a Impacts to traffic would be considered. good idea since that is how the traffic routes from east-bound University to north-bound GA. Our intention was that on-street parking would be removed only if the apartments redevelop (and provide their own on- Also, They want to remove a street parking on one side of site parking). This will be modified. Blueridge between Elkin and Amherst. Those apartment dwellers already have very limited parking options. Punga Edith P: My tepid response is for 2nd Avenue. However, I Thanks. recommend a hybrid approach--2nd Ave from the Metro to the Beltway, then Ga Ave to Glenmont. Shaded cell indicates discussion point. Page 4 of 13 Response to Comments on Silver Spring to Glenmont Bikeway CAG Member Page Comment Response Daisey 4 The preferred route directions are incomplete, and use We will make these changes. compass directions instead of turn directions. They give a general idea of the route, but are hard to follow as directions on a bicycle if you don't have a compass (in your head). I'd suggest the following revision, with or without the compass directions: Starting at the Glenmont Metrorail Station, the bikeway travels south along the Glenmont Greenway, located on the west side of Georgia Avenue between the Metro parking garage and the sidewalk. After crossing Randolph Road the bikeway turns right (west) onto Maston Street and then left (south) onto Grandview Avenue. Entering the Wheaton CBD, it turns left (east) onto Blueridge Avenue, crosses Georgia Avenue, and then turns right (south) onto Amherst Avenue and crosses University Blvd... Daisey 5 The Glenmont Greenway is not signed at the intersection with Let's discuss. Glenallan Avenue, but it needs to be. If you had not seen it on a map, you'd be more likely to ride down the sidewalk west of Geogia Avenue. Suggested fix is a new item 1 and renumber subsequent items: "1. Install route signs for the Glenmont Greenway crossing of Glenallan Avenue, and apply bikeway pavement markings to indicate the crossing." Shaded cell indicates discussion point. Page 5 of 13 Response to Comments on Silver Spring to Glenmont Bikeway CAG Member Page Comment Response Daisey 7 The "Amherst Avenue From University Blvd to Windham Lane" Good suggestion. section does not address intersections. The intersection with Reedie Dr. is especially problematic because Amherst and Reedie provide access to both Metro and Wheaton Plaza from the east part of the Wheaton CBD and the eastern part of Montgomery County, with high right turn traffic volume from southbound Amherst to westbound Reedie and high left turn traffic volume from eastbound Reedie to northbound Amherst. Suggested fix: Treatment: Protected Intersections (specific details TBD by further analysis). New items for recommended intersection changes Daisey 8/9 Plyers Mill Rd westbound at the Georgia Ave intersection is We haven't had a chance to field verify this recommendation, steep, making it difficult for a bicyclist to get started after but this recommendations seems to make sense.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The City of Edinburgh Council Edinburgh LRT Masterplan Feasibility Study Final Report
    The City of Edinburgh Council Edinburgh LRT Masterplan Feasibility Study Final Report The City of Edinburgh Council Edinburgh LRT Masterplan Feasibility Study Final Report January 2003 Ove Arup & Partners International Ltd Admiral House, Rose Wharf, 78 East Street, Leeds LS9 8EE Tel +44 (0)113 242 8498 Fax +44 (0)113 242 8573 REP/FI Job number 68772 The City of Edinburgh Council Edinburgh LRT Masterplan Feasibility Study Final Report CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1. INTRODUCTION 9 1.1 Scope of the Report 9 1.2 Study Background and Objectives 9 1.3 Transport Trends 10 1.4 Planning Context 10 1.5 The Integrated Transport Initiative 11 1.6 Study Approach 13 1.7 Light Rapid Transit Systems 13 2. PHASE 1 APPRAISAL 18 2.1 Introduction 18 2.2 Corridor Review 18 2.3 Development Proposals 21 2.4 The City of Edinburgh Conceptual Network 22 2.5 Priorities for Testing 23 2.6 North Edinburgh Loop 24 2.7 South Suburban Line 26 2.8 Appraisal of Long List of Corridor Schemes 29 2.9 Phase 1 Findings 47 3. APPROACH TO PHASE 2 50 3.1 Introduction 50 3.2 Technical Issues and Costs 50 3.3 Rolling Stock 54 3.4 Tram Services, Run Times and Operating Costs 55 3.5 Environmental Impact 55 3.6 Demand Forecasting 56 3.7 Appraisal 61 4. NORTH EDINBURGH LOOP 63 4.1 Alignment and Engineering Issues 63 4.2 Demand and Revenue 65 4.3 Environmental Issues 66 4.4 Integration 67 4.5 Tram Operations and Car Requirements 67 4.6 Costs 68 4.7 Appraisal 69 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide Signs for Freeways and Expressways Are Primarily Identified by the Name of the Sign Rather Than by an Assigned Sign Designation
    2011 Edition Page 235 CHAPTER 2E. GUIDE SIGNS—FREEWAYS AND EXPRESSWAYS Section 2E.01 Scope of Freeway and Expressway Guide Sign Standards Support: 01 The provisions of this Chapter provide a uniform and effective system of signing for high-volume, high- speed motor vehicle traffic on freeways and expressways. The requirements and specifications for expressway signing exceed those for conventional roads (see Chapter 2D), but are less than those for freeway signing. Since there are many geometric design variables to be found in existing roads, a signing concept commensurate with prevailing conditions is the primary consideration. Section 1A.13 includes definitions of freeway and expressway. 02 Guide signs for freeways and expressways are primarily identified by the name of the sign rather than by an assigned sign designation. Guidelines for the design of guide signs for freeways and expressways are provided in the “Standard Highway Signs and Markings” book (see Section 1A.11). Standard: 03 The provisions of this Chapter shall apply to any highway that meets the definition of freeway or expressway facilities. Section 2E.02 Freeway and Expressway Signing Principles Support: 01 The development of a signing system for freeways and expressways is approached on the premise that the signing is primarily for the benefit and direction of road users who are not familiar with the route or area. The signing furnishes road users with clear instructions for orderly progress to their destinations. Sign installations are an integral part of the facility and, as such, are best planned concurrently with the development of highway location and geometric design.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL REPORT SWLRT Engineering Evaluation of Freight Rail
    Submitted to Metropolitan Council Submitted by TranSystems March 21, 2014 FINAL REPORT SWLRT Engineering Evaluation of Freight Rail Relocation Alternatives SWLRT Engineering Evaluation of Freight Rail Relocation Alternatives FINAL REPORT Table of Contents I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... ........... 1 II. Background ............................................................................................................................... ............ 2 A. TC&W Network and Operations ....................................................................................................... 2 B. Freight Rail Industry Changes ........................................................................................................... 4 III. Scope of Engineering Evaluation ....................................................................................................... 6 IV. Review of Past Studies ...................................................................................................................... 7 A. St. Louis Park Railroad Study (March 1999) ...................................................................................... 7 B. TCWR Freight Rail Realignment Study (November 2009) ................................................................. 7 C. Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan (January 2010).................. 7 D. Freight Rail Study – Evaluation of TCWR Routing Alternatives
    [Show full text]
  • Project Listing Final
    KANSAS CITY METROPOLITAN REGION TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 2012-2016 Revision Date: Friday, August 30, 2013 Bistate TIP #: 956004 Juris: JOHNSON COUNTY Location/Improvement: FIXED ROUTE LINE HAUL SERVICE TRANSIT State #: Federal #: County: REGIONAL Type: Vehicle Operations Length (mi): N/A Phase Year of Type Source Cost (IN THOUSANDS) Description: Includes Capital Cost of Contracting, Preventive Maintenance Activities, Obligation Vehicle Purchases, and Miscellaneous Capital Items. Other2010 Federal 5307 $2,125.0 Status: Other2011 Non-Federal LOCAL $2,062.5 Other2013 Federal 5307 $1,950.0 Other2014 Federal 5307 $1,800.0 Other2011 Federal 5307 $1,650.0 Other2012 Federal 5307 $1,650.0 Other2013 Non-Federal LOCAL $760.0 Other2010 Non-Federal LOCAL $531.3 Other2014 Non-Federal LOCAL $450.0 Other2012 Non-Federal LOCAL $412.5 Federal Total: $9,175.0 Non-Federal Total: $4,216.3 Total: $13,391.3 TIP #: 996077 Juris: JOHNSON COUNTY Location/Improvement: I-35 BUS ON SHOULDER TRANSIT State #: Federal #: County: REGIONAL Type: Other (capital) Length (mi): 19.0 Phase Year of Type Source Cost (IN THOUSANDS) Description: I-35 Bus on Shoulder and related activities Obligation Other2004 Federal 5309 $1,500.0 Status: Other2006 Federal 330-KS $397.4 Other2004 Non-Federal STATE-KS $375.0 Other2005 Federal 5309 $300.0 Other2005 Non-Federal STATE-KS $75.0 Federal Total: $2,197.4 Non-Federal Total: $450.0 Total: $2,647.4 TIP #: 996087 Juris: JOHNSON COUNTY Location/Improvement: TRANSPORTATION SERVICE FOR THE JO ROUTES 669/I AND 677/R TRANSIT State #: Federal #: County: REGIONAL Type: Other (Transit) Length (mi): N/A Phase Year of Type Source Cost (IN THOUSANDS) Description: Maintain service on two current routes that provide transportation services to Obligation welfare recipients, eligible low-income individuals, and employees who work in Other2012 Non-Federal LOCAL $124.4 portions of the metropolitan area that are underserved by transit.
    [Show full text]
  • Long Range Transportation Plan 2016
    LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN “By failing to prepare, you are preparing to fail.” -- Benjamin Franklin 2016 PENNSYLVANIA LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Message................................................................................................................................... 1 Overview .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Purpose of ‘PA On Track’ .................................................................................................................................................3 History of Transportation Planning in Pennsylvania .........................................................................................................4 Document Navigator ........................................................................................................................................................5 Outreach Summary ................................................................................................................................ 7 Stakeholder Involvement .................................................................................................................................................7 Public Outreach ...............................................................................................................................................................7 Planning Context .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • RECEIVED Hon
    PILLAR AND MULROY, P.C. ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW SUITE 700 312 BOULEVARD OF THE ALLIES PITTSBURGH, PA 15222 TELEPHONE (412) 471-3300 FAX: (412) 471-6068 JOHN A. PILLAR THOMAS M. MULROY December 6, IS'^O " ANTHONY A. SEETHALER, JR. Re: Transamerican Trucking Service, Inc.—Purchase (Portion)— 'Off. Nicklaus Freight Lines, Inc. File No. 1342 RECEIVED Hon. Jerry Rich, Secretary Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission DEC 81990 P. O. Box 3265 SECRETARY'S Gr-HuE Harrisburg, PA 1712 0 Public UtiJity Commission Dear Mr. Rich: We enclose herewith for filing the original and two copies of the application of Transamerican Trucking Service/ Inc. to purchase a portion of the operating rights of Nicklaus Freight Lines, Inc. The filing fee of $350.00 is also enclosed. Please acknowledge receipt on the duplicate copy of this letter of transmittal and return it to the undersigned. If any further information is required, please advise. Very, truly yours JOHN A. PILLAR sw Enclosures cc: Transamerican Trucking Service, Inc William J. Lavelle, Esq. F mm^S5 UP.-190 : Transfer ^Rev 8/88) APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF TRANSFER^ / ' ^ 9c AND EXERCISE OF COMMON OR CONTRACT CARRIER-RIGHTS BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIQNr*-^^-*^ Application of TRANS AMERICAN TRUCKING SERVICE, INC. (Appl icant/Transferee-Buyer) for approval of the transfer and to exercise the right PUC USE ONLY as a common carrier, described at Docket Docket No. /D 1 7 1 3 (common-contract) Folder No. No. A -iO{flOl Folder No. , issued to NICKLAUS FREIGHT LINES, INC (Transferor-Seller) for transportation of property (persons-property) DEC 81990 iSECRETARY'S'OFBIGE Public utility Commission SEE INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE COMPLETING^APPLICATION ym TRANS AMERICAN TRUCKING SERVICE, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Dictionary Location ID Is a Four to Six Digit Count Section Identifier Used to Reference Locations Where Traffic Data Is Collected
    Traffic Monitoring Section Data Dictionary Location ID is a four to six digit count section identifier used to reference locations where traffic data is collected. The Location ID can be utilized to access detailed traffic data in the Transportation Data Management System (TDMS) • Four digit count section identifiers (i.e. 7701) are associated with ramps and crossovers on the state highway system (i.e. 7701) • Five digit count section identifier (i.e. 53035) are associate with traffic count section located on roadway sections owned by local agencies • Six digit count section identifiers (i.e. 100007) are associated with mainline roadway segments on the state highway system (i.e. 100007) Definitions of Alpha-Numeric Route Designations Route is the alpha numeric route designation of the highway. The number is the signed route number of the highway appearing on the shield. Interstate (I) represents the networks of access controlled highways that form the National Highway System • Interstates (I) are signed with an Interstate Highway shield US Routes (US) are a nationwide network of roads and highways that form the Federal Highways • US Routes (US)are signed with a US Highway shield State Routes (SR) are roadways that are owned and maintained by the state of Arizona. • State Routes (SR) are signed by the Arizona Route shield The following are Signed Route Qualifiers where: • A is an Alternate Route • B is a Business Route • L Is Loop Route • S is a Spur Route • T is a Truck Route • X is a Temporary Route • Y is a Wye Leg Route • (N) indicates the numerical sequence of a discontinuous route.
    [Show full text]
  • USRN Application Updated 2011
    Updated August 1, 2016 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials An Application from the State Highway or Transportation Department of North Carolina for: Elimination of a U.S. (Interstate) Route AASHTO Use Only Establishment of a U.S. (Interstate) Route I-587 (Future) Extension of a U.S. (Interstate) Route Relocation of a U.S. (Interstate) Route Establishment of a U.S. Alternate Route Establishment of a Temporary U.S. Route **Recognition of a Business Route on U.S. (Interstate) Route **Recognition of a By-Pass Route on U.S. Route Between US-64 in Zebulon (Wake County) and US-264 in Greenville (Pitt County) The following states or states are involved: North Carolina • **“Recognition of…”A local vicinity map needed on page 3. On page 6 a short statement to the effect that there are no deficiencies on proposed routing, if true, will suffice. • If there are deficiencies, they should be indicated in accordance with page 5 instructions. • All applications requesting Interstate establishment or changes are subject to concurrence and approval by the FHWA DATE SUBMITTED: September 16, 2016 SUBMIT APPLICATION ELECTRONICALLY TO [email protected] • *Bike Routes: this form is not applicable for US Bicycle Route System The purpose of the United States (U.S.) Numbered Highway System is to facilitate travel on the main interstate highways, over the shortest routes and the best available roads. A route should form continuity of available facilities through two or more states that accommodate the most important and heaviest motor traffic flow in the area. The routes comprising the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways will be marked with its own distinctive route marker shield and will have a numbering system that is separate and apart from the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Scanned Document
    SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON US ROUTE NUMBERING (USRN) ACTIVITY REPORT 2016 AMENDED 11/14/20165 Officers: Chair Mark McConnell, MS, Region 2 Members: Richard Tetreault, VT, Region 1 Mark Van Port Fleet, MI, Region 3 Joshua Laipply, CO Region 4 Marty Vitale, AASHTO, Secretary Below you will find the seven applications sent to AASHTO for review and approval from seven member departments. There will be no meeting conducted by the committee in Boston, MA. Its decisions are presented to the Standing Committee on Highways in this document and will be voted on by SCOH at its meeting on November 13, 2016 for approval and announcement to the AASHTO Board of Directors. It is important to note that all applications are examined carefully as being compliant with the purpose and policy set forth by the Standing Committee on Highways and the AASHTO Board of Directors. MEMBER DOT ROUTE Description Decision Alabama Interstate 22- Between I-65 in Birmingham, AL and Coalburg Road in 4 Approve Establish Birmingham, AL Route begins at mile marker 96.480 and the (segment) junction of I-65 in Birmingham, AL from the junction of I-65 in Birmingham, AL., westerly to Coalburg Road (Exit 93) in Birmingham, AL Traveling over existing Future Interstate 22 and continuing west to Birmingham, AL. and Jasper, AL for 2.879 miles. Route ends at mile marker 93.601 and the junction of Coalburg Road in Birmingham, AL. Idaho USBR 10- This is to address a safety issue at the intersection of Leclerc 4 Approve Realignment Road and U.S. Hwy 2 in Oldtown, ID (just east of Newport, WA), the route has been modified to now have cyclists first travel westbound to cross US 2 at a signalized intersection with ID Hwy 41 before heading eastbound on US 2 (see rows 5-9 on attachment B) Kentucky US 431- Between US 431 in Russellville and US 68 in Russellville Begins: 4 Approve Relocation US 431 originate south of Owensboro, Kentucky.
    [Show full text]
  • Interstate 50Th Anniversary: the Story of Oregon's Interstates
    Interstate 50th Anniversary The Story of Oregon’s Interstates Table of Contents 1) Introduction ....................................................................................................................2 2) Oregon’s road-building legacy...................................................................................... 2 3) The interstate comes to Oregon .................................................................................. 5 i) Segments of interest on I-5............................................................................. 5 ii) Focus moves to I-80N (today’s I-84) ............................................................ 6 iii) Notable segments on I-84............................................................................... 6 iv) Oregon’s minor major interstate: I-82........................................................... 7 v) Oregon’s other interstates ............................................................................... 8 vi) Oregon’s interstate segments that weren’t.................................................... 10 4) Interstate finalization chart ........................................................................................... 12 5) Interstate-related issues in Oregon .............................................................................. 12 6) Highway beautification.................................................................................................. 14 7) What’s next?....................................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • Kansas Crash Data Dictionary, 2005
    Kansas Department of Transportation Bureau of Transportation Planning Geometric and Accident Data Unit Topic: Metadata Report 2 Values and Their Meanings for Selected KARS Domains Domain=AADT Low Value High Value Meaning of Value 0 999999 Domain=ACCESS CONTROL CANSYS Low Value High Value Meaning of Value 0 no access control 1 partial access control 2 full access control Domain=ACCESS CONTROL TRUCKS Low Value High Value Meaning of Value 0 no control 1 full control 88 other 99 unknown Domain=ACCIDENT CLASS Low Value High Value Meaning of Value 0 other non-collision 1 overturned 2 coll w pedestrian 3 coll w other motor vehicle 4 coll w parked motor vehicle 5 coll w railway train 6 coll w pedalcycle 7 coll w animal 8 coll w fixed object 9 coll w other object 88 other 99 unknown Domain=ACCIDENT LOCATION Low Value High Value Meaning of Value 11 non-intersection-on roadway 12 intersection-on roadway 13 intrsection-related-on roadway 14 pklot-drvway access-on roadway 15 interchange area-on roadway 16 on crossover-on roadway 21 roadside-incl shldr-off rdwy 22 median-off roadway 23 pklot,rest area twy-off rdwy 88 other 99 unknown Domain=ACCIDENTS.ACCIDENT_KEY Low Value High Value Meaning of Value 1.99E+11 2.021E+11 Domain=ACCIDENTS.AMENDED_REPORT_IND Low Value High Value Meaning of Value 0 not amended 1 amended Domain=ACCIDENTS.CASE_STATUS Low Value High Value Meaning of Value C clean E error P passed R raw Domain=ACCIDENTS.CONTROL_SECTION Low Value High Value Meaning of Value 1 500 Domain=ACCIDENT_SUMMARY.NBR_OF_DISABLED Low Value High Value Meaning
    [Show full text]
  • Judge Turns Down Motion for Mistrial on Manson
    I f . \ PAGE TWENTY MancliFJstpr'lEttraing ffiaalft MONDAY, AUGUST 8. 1970 Average Daily Net Press Ron ?or Ihe Week Ended The Weather June 27; 1980 Clear, cool tonight; low in 60b. Patchy tog in . some areas at Census Bureau dawn. Tomorrow’ partly suhny, Loses a Town 15,610 cool; high in 70s. Tliursday— Choicest Meats In Town! Z Manch^ter— A City of Village Charm fair, warmer. In Oklahoma WASHINOTON (AP) — The VOL. LXXXIX, NO. 259 (SEXTEEN PAGES) TUESDAir ONLY SPECIAL* • MANCHES'TER, CONN.,,’TUESDAY, AUGUST 4, 1970 ( CHmsifled Advertlataig on Page U ) Census Bureau loet a town in SHOULDER % PRICE TEN CENTS Oklahoma. "Colcord, Okla., may not compare with New York City or LAMB CHOPS lb 99«: Los Angeles in the eyes of the BIB 2 Census Bureau,” said Rep. Ekl Bdmondscm, “ But to the people LAMB CHOPS Trial Seen who live and work there, It Is a UeS. Bombing L o m 2 2. i mighty Important place." As Impetus Judge Turns Down Motion Hie 4Se Colcord residents no­ ticed last week that preliminary LAMB CHOPS *5 census figures printed in Okla­ NATIVE BIRCH MOUNTAIN Of Turmoil homa papers left them out. Edmondson, D-Okla., said the In Cambodia HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) — C U K ES 3 FOR 19* : census takers had lumped the Several community leaders here citizens of Colcord with rural Say the six nights of disorders residents of Delaware County. HIGHLAND PARK MARKET S during the past week were pre­ For Mistrial on Manson The bureau people promise to cipitated by the manslaughter mend their ways and recognize 317 Highland St., Manchester— ^Phone 646-4277 2 trial of a Hartford poUceman, -On Request By LINDA DEUT8CH Colcord as the city it is, Ed­ but depressed conditions made mondson said.
    [Show full text]