DOCSLIB.ORG

IN the COURT of APPEALS of IOWA No. 3-563 / 12-2303 Filed

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IN the COURT of APPEALS of IOWA No. 3-563 / 12-2303 Filed IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 3-563 / 12-2303 Filed July 10, 2013 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF STANLEY DUANE MARQUETTE, Deceased. STEVE CLIFTON, d.b.a. BYLAND, INC., Appellant, KENNETH CROSSER and APRIL HAMMACK, Appellees. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Wapello County, James Q. Blomgren, Judge. The appellants claim the district court erred in awarding a Court Officer Deed to the appellees for a section of an alley not included in the original deed. AFFIRMED. Michael J. Moreland and Nicholas T. Maxwell of Harrison, Moreland, Webber & Simplot, Ottumwa, for appellant. Cynthia D. Hucks, Ottumwa, and Lloyd E. Keith of Keith Law Firm, Ottumwa, for appellees. Considered by Vogel, P.J., and Vaitheswaran and Bower, JJ. 2 VOGEL, P.J. I. Factual and Procedural Background Stanley Marquette, now deceased, was the owner of four parcels of adjacent residential real estate in Ottumwa, Iowa, in addition to some farm real estate. The residential parcels were located at the following three local addresses1: 2502 North Court, 2514 Clearview, and 109 East Elmdale. The property currently at issue is the north eight feet of an alley that runs east to west between 2502 North Court and 2514 Clearview. Stanley Marquette’s estate was initially administered by his brother, Kenneth Marquette.2 The report and inventory of assets, which was filed on December 2, 2009, contained the legal descriptions of all the lots, except for the north half of the alley. Kenneth Marquette engaged real estate agent Joe Traul to sell the four parcels in the estate, and Traul arranged for Byland, Inc., by its president, Steven W. Clifton (Clifton), to purchase the four residential properties. However, after the probate court approved this purchase agreement, it was discovered the note on the Clearview property was in default, and its mortgage was being foreclosed by Wells Fargo Bank as assignee of a February 18, 2005 recorded mortgage. As such, Clifton entered into a second agreement on June 10, 2011, whereby he agreed to purchase the remaining three parcels of real estate located at 2502 North Court and 109 East Elmdale. He understood from his real estate agent that he was offering to purchase all the residential property not subject to 1 Two of the lots share one local address. 2 South Ottumwa Savings Bank was later appointed substitute administrator. 3 foreclosure proceedings. Neither the first nor second purchase agreement included the north half of the alley in the properties’ legal descriptions, though the south half of the alley was described as part of the 2502 North Court property. A Court Officer’s Deed was given to Clifton for the 2502 North Court and 109 East Elmdale properties. The deed’s legal description of the properties mirrored the descriptions in the second purchase agreement and did not contain the north half of the alley. On June 20, 2011, a foreclosure decree and order quieting title was entered in favor of Wells Fargo Bank. The decree did not describe the north half of the alley. On April 13, 2012, a sheriff’s deed was issued to the Bank, who in turn sold and conveyed the property to Kenneth Crosser and April Hammack by special warranty deed on July 16, 2012. The deed to Crosser and Hammack did not describe the alley. However, the abstract of title, prepared by Truitt Abstracting Company on June 5, 2012, in anticipation of Crosser and Hammack’s purchase of the Clearview property, did include the disputed alleyway.3 Relying on the abstract of title, the representation of their realtor, and 3 The abstract of title to the Clearview property contains the following description: Lot Twenty-five (25) in Block Four (4) in North Ottumwa, being a subdivision of the Fractional South Half of Section Seven (7), Township Seventy-two (72), Range Thirteen (13) Wapello County, Iowa, AND The North Half of the Sixteen foot wide East and West Alley, lying between Clearview Street and Kenwood Street and abutting Lot 25 in Block 4 in North Ottumwa Addition to the City of Ottumwa, on the South, all in the City of Ottumwa, Wapello County, Iowa. Additionally, it shows Stanley Marquette received two deeds: one dated July 26, 1989, which does not include the north half of the alley; and one dated July 28, 1989, which does include the north half of the alley, with the notation, “This Deed Supplements Warranty Deed Filed First.” Marquette mortgaged the Clearview property three times. The first mortgage was to South Ottumwa Savings Bank filed July 31, 1989, which does not include the north half of the alley. The next mortgage to Ameriquest Mortgage Company filed January 20, 2000, does include the north half of the alley. These first two 4 Lloyd Keith, the attorney for the estate’s administrator, Crosser and Hammack believed the north half of the alley was part of the Clearview property and would be conveyed to them. On July 23, 2012, Keith filed an amended inventory listing the north half of the alley as a fifth parcel. Later that day, after being informed by someone in Clifton’s company Clifton did not wish to own the alley, Keith delivered a deed to Crosser and Hammack that included the north half of the alley. However, a few hours later, Clifton informed Keith he believed he should own the alley as part of his purchase of all the estate’s property not in foreclosure. As such, Keith delivered another deed to Clifton that also contained the north half of the alley. Both Clifton and Crosser and Hammack were instructed not to record their deeds until the issue was adjudicated. Keith then filed an “Application for Court Order to Direct the Disposition of Real Estate” on July 30, 2012, to determine to whom the disputed portion of the alley belonged. On August 20, 2012, the district court held a hearing on Keith’s application. In the hearing, Clifton and Traul testified their understanding was that Clifton was to purchase all of the residential property held in the estate that mortgages were both released. The third mortgage, filed February 18, 2005, was held by Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”), as mortgagee, with GE Money Bank as lender. This mortgage does not include the description of the north half of the alley. It was assigned by instrument filed December 30, 2010, to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., again without the inclusion of the legal description for the north half of the alley. The abstract also reflects the probate inventory that was filed, but none of the properties listed included a description of the north half of the alley. None of the foreclosure proceedings, including the abstract’s summary of the proceedings, the petition for foreclosure and alternative action to quiet title, the court’s foreclosure decree, or the Sherriff’s deed conveying the lot to Wells Fargo included the north half of the alley. However, at entry number twenty-three of the abstract there appears: “ABSTRACTER’S NOTE: The following Tax information if (sic) furnished but not certified to: Parcel #400-007411200023000–Lot 25 Block 4; also N1/2 alley adj on S.” 5 was not subject to foreclosure, including the north half of the alley. Crosser testified he was not going to purchase the Clearview property without the north half of the alley, and that Keith told him it would be conveyed to him. Keith explained that “generally when alleys are split up, one half goes to the adjoining parcel and one half goes to the other adjoining parcel.” He said it was just an oversight the north half of the alley had been omitted from the probate inventory and proceedings. The district court ruled in favor of Crosser and Hammack, declaring they were entitled to a Court Officer Deed for the north half of the alley. This ruling was based on the abstract of title, which included a legal description of the north half of the alley. The court also faulted Clifton, a licensed realtor for over thirty years, for not reviewing his purchase agreement or deed, especially considering both contained the south half of the alley in the legal description. Clifton appeals this decision, claiming the district court erred in awarding the Court Officer Deed to Hammack and Crosser. Specifically, Clifton contends he proved by clear and convincing evidence that reformation of his original deed was warranted, given the intent of the parties to transfer all residential lots in the estate not subject to foreclosure, which would have included the north half of the alley. II. Standard of Review As the district court noted, this is an action determining the title of real property, which is a suit in equity. Moser v. Thorp Sales Corp., 312 N.W.2d 881, 886 (Iowa 1981). We review the court’s decision de novo. See Garrett v. Huster, 684 N.W.2d 250, 253 (Iowa 2004). Suits based in equity allow the court 6 considerable flexibility in determining the equities between the parties and in framing a remedy. Hosteng Concrete & Gravel, Inc. v. Tullar, 524 N.W.2d 445, 448 (Iowa Ct. App. 1994). With regard to actions to quiet title, a court sitting in equity has the power to grant reformation of an instrument, though the party seeking reformation must show by clear and convincing evidence the agreement, as written, does not conform to the original understanding. Id. III. Conveyance of the North Half of the Alley Reformation of a legal instrument is proper even when the parties are not part of the original contract, as long as they were in privity with the original party.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Adjudicated Prop Ltr to Prospective Purchasers
    MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF THE PARISH ATTORNEY PROPERTY DIVISION 222 St. Louis Street, Suite 902 P. O. Box 1471 Baton Rouge, LA 70802 Baton Rouge, LA 70821 Phone: (225) 389-3114 (Donna or Renita) Email: [email protected] [email protected] WEBSITE: www.brla.gov/parish attorney/adjudicated property The process of purchasing adjudicated property is complex. YOU ARE STRONGLY ADVISED TO CONSULT A PRIVATE ATTORNEY, PARTICULARLY ONE THAT HANDLES REAL ESTATE TRANSACTIONS. That attorney can advise you as to the process, the statues governing the sale of adjudicated property, abstract and title examination, etc. This office cannot and will not give you legal advice on this or any other matter. We will simply facilitate the sale process. In order to assist you in the purchase of adjudicated property, the City-Parish has adopted the following procedures in accordance with the provisions of LSA-R.S. 47:2196 et seq. Those statutes are attached hereto for your reference. REDEMPTION OF PROPERTY: Please note that the tax debtor/owner of an adjudicated property has the right to redeem that property with the East Baton Rouge Parish Sheriff at any time prior to our sale of the property to you. If the redemption occurs after the initial three year period, you will be able to recover the advanced costs you have remitted to initiate the process. We will not open a file for any property that has been adjudicated for less than three years from the date the Act of Adjudication was recorded. THE PROCESS: Before beginning the process to purchase an adjudicated property with our office, you must first determine that the property in which you are interested has in fact been adjudicated, and is still adjudicated, to the City-Parish.
    [Show full text]
  • Real Estate Title and Escrow Companies: a BSA Filing Study
    Financial Crimes Enforcement Network Real Estate Title and Escrow Companies: A BSA Filing Study Assessing Suspicious Activity Reports and Suspicious Form 8300 Filings Related to Real Estate Title and Escrow Businesses 2003–2011 July 2012 Real Estate Title and Escrow Companies: A BSA Filing Study i Table of Contents Introduction 1 Executive Summary 4 Methodology 8 Research and Analysis 11 Appendix 47 ii Introduction The mission of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) is to enhance the integrity of financial systems by facilitating the deterrence and detection of financial crime. One tool FinCEN uses to accomplish this mission is a series of statutory authorities commonly referred to as the Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”). Consistent with the BSA, and other authorities, FinCEN’s regulations require financial institutions to submit to FinCEN certain records or reports that may have a high degree of usefulness in criminal, tax, or regulatory investigations or proceedings, or in the conduct of intelligence or counterintelligence activities, including analysis, to protect against international terrorism. FinCEN oversees the maintenance of a database with approximately 180 million records of financial transactions and other reports filed by institutions subject to the BSA. This data represents the most broadly relied upon and largest source of financial intelligence available to law enforcement and regulatory authorities at the Federal, State, and local levels. FinCEN’s own use of these filings to identify trends and patterns and to provide feedback to the filing public often leads to published reports such as this one dealing with the nature of the filings that pertain to real estate-related title and escrow companies.
    [Show full text]
  • December 21, 2016 Ambiguity and Ignorance in Mattson Ridge, LLC V
    December 21, 2016 Ambiguity and Ignorance in Mattson Ridge, LLC v. Clear Rock Title and Ticor Insurance Company By RONALD P. MURPHY, LS EMERITUS I have been requested to provide an opinion as to whether the legal description of concern in the Mattson Ridge, LLC v. Clear Rock Title, LLP case was ambiguous or not. My opinion is in four parts. Part one will include extrinsic evidence, the deed of 1891, the incipient deed, and review the instrument from the point of view or the parties at the time it was executed. It will look at the marketable title issue as cited in City of North Mankato v. Carlstrom N.W. 2nd 130, 133 (1942). A marketable title is “one that is free from reasonable doubt; one that a prudent person, with full knowledge of all the facts would be willing to accept.” Mattson Ridge deemed the title unmarketable because the description was ambiguous. Part two is the location of the original trail or township road on the ground. Part three is based on the face of the document, all of the deed of 2005, and not just a part of it. That opinion is limited to the rules of construction in interpreting instruments, the meaning of words and the difference in, and the value to be applied to, directory calls and locative calls, as well as the intent of the instrument, none of which were used by the attorneys or the courts. Any one of these three methods is sufficient to prove the descriptions of record were not ambiguous, and if not ambiguous, then marketable.
    [Show full text]
  • Council of the Town of Castle Rock, Colorado, on First and Final Reading by Avote of Cjf for and ^9 Against
    RESOLUTION NO. 2018-080 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONTRACT TO BUY AND SELL REAL ESTATE FOR THE ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 830 N. WILCOX STREET WHEREAS, the Town and Hung Nguyen have agreed to the terms and conditions by which the Town will acquire the real property located at 830 N. Wilcox Street, Castle Rock, Colorado. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF CASTLE ROCK, COLORADO AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Approval. The Contract to Buy and Sell Real Estate in the form attached as Exhibit 1 is hereby approved. The Mayor and other proper Town officials are authorized to execute the Contract by and on behalf ofthe Town ofCastle Rock, Colorado. Section 2. Encumbranceand Authorization for Payment. In order to meet the Town's financial obligation under the Contract, the Town Council authorizes the expenditure and payment from the 2018 appropriation account no. 110-1530-415.79-11, in an amount not to exceed $849,000, unless authorized in writing by the Town ofCastle Rock. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of September, 2018 by the Town Council of the Town of Castle Rock, Colorado, on first and final reading by a vote of Cjf for and ^9 against. ATTEST: TOWN OF CASTLE ROCK MA .isa Anderson, To^n-Gferk Jenmfer Greerf, Mayor Approved as to form: Approved as to content: Town Attorney Goebel, P.E., Director ofPublic Works Exhibit 1 1 2 3 ©REALTY GROUP One Group Premier Jeff Samuelson 5 Ph: 303-798-4300 6 7 The printed portions of this form, except differentiated additions, have been approved by the Colorado Real Estate 8 Commission.(CBS3-6-15) (Mandatory 1-16) 9 10 THIS FORM HAS IMPORTANT LEGAL CONSEQUENCES AND THE PARTIES SHOULD CONSULT LEGAL 11 12 AND TAX OR OTHER COUNSEL BEFORE SIGNING.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Green Procurement Spillovers: Evidence from Municipal Building Policies in California
    Government Green Procurement Spillovers: Evidence from Municipal Building Policies in California Timothy Simcoe Michael W. Toffel Working Paper 13-030 May 14, 2014 Copyright © 2012, 2013, 2014 by Timothy Simcoe and Michael W. Toffel Working papers are in draft form. This working paper is distributed for purposes of comment and discussion only. It may not be reproduced without permission of the copyright holder. Copies of working papers are available from the author. Government Green Procurement Spillovers: * Evidence from Municipal Building Policies in California Timothy Simcoe Michael W. Toffel Boston University School of Management Harvard Business School 595 Commonwealth Ave. Morgan Hall 497 Boston, MA 02215 Boston, MA 02163 (617) 358-5725 (617) 384-8043 [email protected] [email protected] May 14, 2014 ABSTRACT We study how government green procurement policies influence private-sector demand for similar products. Specifically, we measure the impact of municipal policies requiring governments to construct green buildings on private-sector adoption of the US Green Building Council's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) standard. Using matching methods, panel data, and instrumental variables, we find that government procurement rules produce spillover effects that stimulate both private-sector adoption of the LEED standard and investments in green building expertise by local suppliers. These findings suggest that government procurement policies can accelerate the diffusion of new environmental standards that require coordinated complementary investments by various types of private adopter. JEL Codes: L15, Q58, Q55, O33. Keywords: Public procurement, green building, quality certification, environmental policy. * We thank Melissa Ouellet and Mark Stout for their outstanding research assistance and Tom Dietsche for providing and interpreting data from the US Green Business Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Contract to Buy and Sell Real Estate
    James R. (JR) Ford 970-264-5000 [email protected] 1 The printed portions of this form, except differentiated additions, have been approved by the Colorado Real Estate Commission. 2 (CBS4-6-18) (Mandatory 1-19) 3 4 THIS FORM HAS IMPORTANT LEGAL CONSEQUENCES AND THE PARTIES SHOULD CONSULT LEGAL AND TAX OR 5 OTHER COUNSEL BEFORE SIGNING. 6 7 CONTRACT TO BUY AND SELL REAL ESTATE 8 (LAND) 9 ( Property with No Residences) 10 ( Property with Residences-Residential Addendum Attached) 11 12 Date: 01/15/19 13 14 AGREEMENT 15 16 1. AGREEMENT. Buyer agrees to buy and Seller agrees to sell the Property described below on the terms and conditions set forth 17 in this contract (Contract). 18 19 2. PARTIES AND PROPERTY. 20 2.1. Buyer. The Board of County Commissioners of Archuleta County, Colorado 21 (Buyer) will take title to the Property described below as Joint Tenants Tenants In Common Other County. 22 2.2. No Assignability. This Contract IS NOT be assignable by Buyer unless otherwise specified in Additional Provisions. 23 2.3. Seller. Fred Harman Art Museum, Inc. (Seller) is the current 24 owner of the 25 Property described below. 26 2.4. Property. The Property is the following legally described real estate in the County of Archuleta, Colorado: 27 Lot C Harman Park Subdivision, Section 15, Township 35, Range 2W known as No. 125 Harman Park Drive Pagosa Springs CO 81147 , 28 Street Address City State Zip 29 30 together with the interests, easements, rights, benefits, improvements and attached fixtures appurtenant thereto, and all interest of 31 Seller in vacated streets and alleys adjacent thereto, except as herein excluded (Property).
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Real Estate Comm Notice of Rule Making
    DEPARTMENT OF REGULATORY AGENCIES DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE REAL ESTATE BROKERS 4 CCR 725-1 NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING HEARING August 5, 2008 Pursuant to and in compliance with Title 12, Article 61 and Title 24, Article 4, C.R.S. as amended, notice of proposed rulemaking is hereby given, including notice to the Attorney General of the State of Colorado and to all persons who have requested to be advised of the intention of the Colorado Real Estate Commission (the “Commission”) to promulgate rules, or to amend, repeal or repeal and re-enact the present rules of the Commission. STATEMENT OF BASIS The statutory basis for the adoption of these rules regarding real estate brokers and salespersons is Parts 1 and 8 of Title 12, Article 61 C.R.S. The specific rulemaking provisions contained therein are sections 12-61-114(4) and 12-61-110.5(5), C.R.S. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE The purpose of these rules is to amend rule F-7 regarding the mandatory use of standard and approved forms, to add new mandatory forms and to amend existing mandatory forms. Proposed New, Amended and Repealed Rules [Deleted material in the body of the rules is shown struck through, new material in the body of the rules is shown with underscore. Rules, or portions of rules, which are unaffected are not reproduced. New forms and existing forms with changes are attached. Changes to existing forms are shown on the forms. Unaffected forms are not reproduced. Readers are advised to obtain a copy of the complete rules of the Commission at www.dora.state.co.us/real-estate ] THE PROPOSED AMENDED RULES: DEPARTMENT OF REGULATORY AGENCIES DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE COLORADO REAL ESTATE COMMISSION Rule F – Use of Commission Approved Forms F-7 Commission Approved Forms Page 1 of 4 Real estate brokers are required to use Commission-approved forms as appropriate to a transaction or circumstance to which a relevant form is applicable.
    [Show full text]
  • Real Estate in the Equity of Your Home EXAMINER Your Listing Deserves Every Opportunity Reverse Mortgages Are All That Wee Dodo!! Possible
    AGENT’S PERSPECTIVE TITLE INSURANCE: CRITICAL TO PROTECTING YOUR HOME PURCHASE wills - all of which could potentially will review records from the county cloud or blemish the property’s title. recorder’s office and from various A property’s title generally consists tax agencies so that both the owner of a number of reports and records, and lender are assured that a thor- known as a property abstract or ough search has been made of all chain of title, which details former public records affecting the property. owners of the property. It is the title When someone is considering the professional’s job to “perfect” the purchase of a property, it is import- title by resolving liens and remov- ant that the property has marketable ing clouds when they find errors or title - that is, clear of any liens, judg- issues. ments, defects or encumbrances. In California, there are two types Title insurance is designed to protect of title insurance policies: a CLTA property owners and mortgage lend- ers against losses which result from (California Land Title Association) of ownership complications, home building ordinance violations, border policy which insures the property imperfections or omissions in title. When you take out a mortgage to buyers purchase title insurance at line disputes, subdivision restric- owner (and is optional) and a ALTA The one-time title insurance buy a home, your lender will require settlement. For a premium indication tions, private restriction violations, or (American Land Title Associa- premium is part of the closing costs that you get title insurance for the of what your title insurance will cost, zoning violations.
    [Show full text]
  • Signature Redacted__
    Blockchain: Digitally Rebuilding the Real Estate Industry by Avi Spielman B.A., Philosophy, 2008 Vanderbilt University Submitted to the Program in Real Estate Development in Conjunction with the Center for Real Estate in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Real Estate Development at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology September, 2016 2016 Avi Spielman All rights reserved The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now kn wn-efeafrcreated. Signature of Author Signature redacted__ Certified by Signature redacted 24,Ihn Y'. Kfennedf Lecturer, Center for Real Estate Thesis Supervisor redacted Accepted by_________________Accptd b ---1--Signature Pr bert Saiz i Rose Associate Professor of Urban Economics and Real Estate, Department of Urban Studies and Center for Real Estate XSSACHS$TTS~INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AUG 1 0 2016 LIBRARIES ARCHIVES Blockchain: Digitally Rebuilding the Real Estate Industry by Avi Spielman Submitted to the Program in Real Estate Development in Conjunction with the Center for Real Estate on July 29, 2016 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Real Estate Development ABSTRACT There are tremendous potential applications for blockchain technology, an innovative distributed ledger database system, within the real estate industry. This paper will explore one aspect- recording property titles- by comparing the benefits and limitations of a blockchain with those of the current record keeping system. This paper will begin with a brief overview of the current state of the title recording system in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Title Guarantee Company Customer Distribution
    Land Title Guarantee Company Customer Distribution Order Number: J60008937-1 Date: 07/06/2017 Property Address: 837 QUAIL DRIVE, FRASER, CO 80442 PLEASE CONTACT YOUR CLOSER OR CLOSER'S ASSISTANT FOR WIRE TRANSFER INSTRUCTIONS For Closing Assistance For Title Assistance Timothy G. Brown Your Response Team 78336 US HWY 40 STE B3 78336 US HWY 40 STE B3 WINTER PARK, CO 80482 WINTER PARK, CO 80482 (970) 722-0454 (Work) (970) 722-0454 (Work) (800) 322-9905 (Work Fax) [email protected] [email protected] Contact License: CO485825 Company License: CO44565 Buyer/Borrower Agent for Buyer NATHAN PETERSON COLDWELL BANKER MOUNTAIN PROPERTIES Delivered via: Electronic Mail Attention: STUART HUSTER 78491 US HWY 40 #4 WINTER PARK, CO 80482 (970) 726-0123 (Work) (970) 531-2345 (Home) (970) 726-0123 (Work Fax) [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Delivered via: Electronic Mail Seller/Owner Agent for Seller THE KENNETH C ROZAS TRUST DTD 4/8/15 REAL ESTATE OF WINTER PARK Attention: KENNETH C ROZAS Attention: LISA LECLAIR WALDORF Delivered via: Electronic Mail PO BOX 58 WINTER PARK, CO 80482 (970) 726-2609 (Work) (970) 797-1946 (Work Fax) [email protected] [email protected] Delivered via: Electronic Mail Land Title Guarantee Company Estimate of Title Fees Order Number: J60008937-1 Date: 07/06/2017 Property Address: 837 QUAIL DRIVE, FRASER, CO 80442 Parties: NATHAN PETERSON Seller: THE KENNETH C. ROZAS TRUST DATED APRIL 8, 2015, AS AMENDED Visit Land Title's Website at www.ltgc.com for directions to any of our offices. Estimate of Title insurance Fees "ALTA" Owner's Policy 06-17-06 $690.00 Deletion of Standard Exception(s) $65.00 Tax Certificate $26.00 Total $781.00 If Land Title Guarantee Company will be closing this transaction, the fees listed above will be collected at closing.
    [Show full text]
  • HUMBLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING PACKET June 22, 2017
    HUMBLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING PACKET June 22, 2017 City Manager Mayor Darrell Boeske Merle Aaron Assistant City Managers Council Members Aimee Phillips Allan Steagall Jason Stuebe Ray Calfee Andy Curry Norman Funderburk David Pierce Agenda Humble City Council Regular Meeting Thursday, June 22, 2017 6:30 P.M. City Hall Council Chamber, 114 West Higgins Humble, Texas Call to order. 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance. 2. Consent agenda items which consist of ministerial or “housekeeping” items as required by law. Items may be removed from the consent agenda and discussed by majority vote of the Council. a. Minutes – Special Meeting Minutes – May 31, 2017 b. Financial Statement c. Current Invoices d. Monthly Department Reports e. Correspondence 3. Adoption of Resolution 17-782 amending Section 2.09.02 “Medical/Physical Examinations – Current Employees”, Section 3.01 “Selection and Hiring/Filling Vacant Positions – New Employees”, and Section 6.10 “To Receive Sick Leave Pay” of the City of Humble Personnel Policies. 4. Nomination and election of a Mayor Pro-Tempore to serve a term of one (1) year. 5. Approval of Reappointment of Dr. Barbara Reischmann and Dr. Guy Sconzo to serve on the Northeast Hospital Authority Board of Trustees for a term of two (2) years. 6. Approval of a Development Plat of Tray Tec, Inc. being a subdivision of 2.5468 acres of land, being all of Unrestricted Reserve “A” of Tray Tec, a subdivision of record in Film Code No. 681598 of the Harris County Map Records, Located in the John M. Wilson Survey, Abstract 940, City of Humble, Harris County, Texas; 1 Block, 1 Reserve.
    [Show full text]
  • COLORADO CLOSINGS (24 Credit Hours) Table of Contents
    COLORADO CLOSINGS (24 Credit Hours) Table of Contents Introduction and Directions for Closings course – 1 PART I – INTRODUCTION TO CLOSING STATEMENTS – 2 “General Proration and Settlement Concepts” – 5 PART II – CLOSING EXAMPLES – 8 Closing Example #1 - A Simple Real Estate Transaction – 8 Closing Example #2 - Final Settlement Through Lending Institution - 14 Closing Example #3 - Final Settlement When a Loan is Assumed – 21 PART III – CLOSING PROBLEMS – 28 Contract, Note & Deed of Trust and Closing Problem #1 – 28 Contract, Lender Documents and Closing Problem #2 – 45 Closing Problem #3 – 82 Closing Problem #4 – 85 McDougal to Smith – Contract Scenario for Closing Problem #5 – 89 Listing Contract Problem – 89 Listing Contract (blank) – 90 Sales Contract Problem – 98 Sales Contract (blank) – 99 First Counterproposal Problem – 116 Counterproposal (blank) – 117 Second Counterproposal Problem – 120 Counterproposal (blank) – 121 PART IV – FINAL CLOSING EXAM – 80 Questions Closing Problem #5 – 124 Blank Worksheets to complete (2) – 126 Final Exam Questions #1 through 25 – 128 Closing Problem #6 – 129 Blank Worksheets to complete (2) – 131 Final Exam Questions #26 through 50 – 133 Closing Problem #7 – 137 Blank Worksheets to complete (2) – 139 Final Exam Questions #51 through 67 – 141 Individual Closings Questions #68 through 80 - 144 MacIntosh Real Estate School Closings Course CLOSINGS (24 credit hours) INTRODUCTION and DIRECTIONS PART I of this course contains an introduction to closings and prorations, and explains RESPA (the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act). This information is essential to understanding and properly solving the closing problems. The solutions to the problems are not common sense, and even a background in accounting probably won't help.
    [Show full text]