Mechanisms and Consequences of Staphylococcus Aureus Leukocidin Ab-Mediated Activation of the Host Nlrp3 Inflammasome

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mechanisms and Consequences of Staphylococcus Aureus Leukocidin Ab-Mediated Activation of the Host Nlrp3 Inflammasome MECHANISMS AND CONSEQUENCES OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS LEUKOCIDIN AB-MEDIATED ACTIVATION OF THE HOST NLRP3 INFLAMMASOME Jason H. Melehani A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy in the Department of Pharmacology in the School of Medicine Chapel Hill 2016 Approved by: Robert A. Nicholas Gary L. Johnson Claire M. Doerschuk Monte S. Willis Joseph A. Duncan © 2016 Jason H. Melehani ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Jason H. Melehani: Mechanisms and consequences of Staphylococcus aureus Leukocidin AB- mediated activation of the host NLRP3 inflammasome (Under the direction of Joseph A. Duncan) The NLRP3 inflammasome is a critical innate immune sensor implicated in the pathogenesis of dozens of infectious and non-infectious diseases. Activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome causes IL-1β and IL-18 secretion and necrotic cell death. Staphylococcus aureus is a common cause of infections in humans. S. aureus produces a family of pore-forming toxins that are cytotoxic to human immune cells. One recently discovered pore-forming toxin, Leukocidin AB, is the focus of studies herein. Leukocidin AB is a human-specific, pore-forming toxin that binds CD11b to initiate pore formation. In order to characterize the mechanism of Leukocidin AB cytotoxicity and determine its significance, we evaluated the effects of Leukocidin AB on primary human monocytes and THP1 monocytic cells. Leukocidin AB was one of the most potent toxins in killing primary human monocytes. In THP1 cells, knockdown of NLRP3 or ASC by shRNA diminished Leukocidin AB- induced cytotoxicity and prevented secretion of IL-1β and IL-18. We also characterized the NLRP3 inflammasome in bacterial survival during phagocytosis. When S. aureus was phagocytosed by THP1 cells, LukAB triggered IL-1β secretion and cell death. shRNA-mediated depletion of NLRP3 or ASC suppressed IL-1β secretion but had no effect on Leukocidin AB- induced cell death. These data suggest that a separate mechanism is responsible for triggering iii cell death when Leukocidin AB binds CD11b on the phagosome membrane instead of the plasma membrane. We also initiated studies to characterize the role of kinases and phosphorylation in the response to Leukocidin AB. Using multiplex inhibitor bead chromatography and quantitative mass spectrometry, we identified eight kinases that rapidly decrease in activity during Leukocidin AB exposure. We demonstrated a role for Death-Associated Protein Kinase in the response to Leukocidin AB by showing that its inhibition suppressed Leukocidin AB-induced cytokine secretion and cytotoxicity. And finally, we used a novel transfection method for overexpressing mutant proteins in THP1 cells to show that the NLRP3 S198D/S201D mutant could spontaneously activate NLRP3 inflammasome signaling. In total, these studies make significant contributions to the understanding of S. aureus pathogenesis and the regulation of innate immune NLRP3 inflammasome signaling in response to a human specific, S. aureus pore-forming toxin. iv To my dear family, friends, and mentors for their unwavering support v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to acknowledge and thank the directors of the UNC Medical Scientist Training Program past and present, the faculty of the Pharmacology Department with whom I interacted, the members of my thesis committee, the numerous faculty and staff at the University of North Carolina with whom I worked with, my collaborators at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill and New York University, my colleagues in the Duncan Lab, my colleagues in the Medical Scientist Training Program and Pharmacology Graduate Program, the Infectious Disease Society of America for funding support, and my family and friends. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................................. xiii LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................ xiv LIST OF ABREVIATIONS.................................................................................................................. xvi CHAPTER 1: Discovery, activation and regulation of the NLRP3 inflammasome ........................... 1 1.1 A general overview of NLRP3 inflammasome form and function ...................................... 1 1.2 Clinical relevance of NLRP3 inflammasome signaling ........................................................ 3 1.3 Interleukin-1β-driven monogenic hyperinflammatory fever disorders are caused by mutations in the NLRP3 inflammasome pathway ................................. 4 1.4 The NLRP3 inflammasome is a master innate immune sensor .......................................... 7 1.5 Cautions in interpreting NLRP3 inflammasome research................................................... 8 1.5.1 Studies frequently overlook important outcomes of NLRP3 inflammasome activity ..................................................................................................................... 8 1.5.2 Dozens of activators and regulators complicate a comprehensive model for NLRP3 inflammasome activation ......................................................... 11 1.5.3 Commonly used Caspase 1 knockout mice are also Caspase 11 deficient .............. 12 1.6 Priming the NLRP3 inflammasome for activation ............................................................. 13 1.6.1 Pattern-recognition receptor signaling upregulates transcription of NLRP3 inflammasome components ...................................................................... 13 1.6.2 Negative feedback loops respond to prolonged priming to reign in NLRP3 inflammasome signaling ............................................................................ 18 1.6.3 Kinase-mediated post-translational priming regulates NLRP3 inflammasome activity .......................................................................................... 22 1.6.4 Caspase 8 contributes to transcriptional and post-translational NLRP3 inflammasome priming ......................................................................................... 25 vii 1.6.5 Multiple ubiquitination signals regulate NLRP3 inflammasome priming and protein degradation .............................................................................................. 28 1.6.6 Post-transcriptional regulation of NLRP3 inflammasome mRNA stability .............. 32 1.6.7 NLRP3 inflammasome signaling without priming .................................................... 33 1.7 Critical features of NLRP3 inflammasome activation ....................................................... 34 1.7.1 Potassium efflux is a universal requirement for NLRP3 inflammasome formation .............................................................................................................. 35 1.7.2 Mitochondrial disruption triggers ROS production ................................................. 37 1.7.3 Lysosome dysfunction liberates the cysteine protease Cathepsin B ...................... 43 1.7.4 Endoplasmic reticulum dysfunction disrupts protein folding ................................. 47 1.7.5 Calcium acts as a second messenger ....................................................................... 49 1.7.6 Ubiquitination acts as a platform for regulator binding .......................................... 58 1.7.7 Phosphorylation controls inflammasome oligomerization ..................................... 62 1.7.7.1 Syk kinase couples C-type lectin domain family members to NLRP3 inflammasome signaling ...................................................................... 62 1.7.7.2 RIPK1/RIPK3- and NLRP3-dependent necrosis overlap .................................. 65 1.7.7.3 Kinases have a wide ranging role in regulating the NLRP3 inflammasome ... 68 1.8 Canonical inflammasome activators: nigericin, ATP and monosodium urate ................. 74 1.8.1 Nigericin is a potassium ionophore that activates the NLRP3 inflammasome ....... 75 1.8.2 Extracellular ATP triggers NLRP3 activation by binding P2RX7 ............................... 85 1.8.3 Monosodium urate disrupts lysosomes to trigger the NLRP3 inflammasome ....... 97 1.9 Consequences of NLRP3 inflammasome signaling in pulmonary diseases .................... 105 1.9.1 The NLRP3 inflammasome is a sentinel in pulmonary infections.......................... 108 1.9.1.1 NLRP3 inflammasome activation helps clear respiratory viruses ................ 108 1.9.1.2 The NLRP3 inflammasome is differentially required for clearing extracellular and intracellular bacterial infections ....................................... 110 1.9.1.3 The NLRP3 inflammasome responds to acute and chronic fungal infections............................................................................................ 113 viii 1.9.2 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is influenced by long term NLRP3 inflammasome stimulation ................................................................................. 115 1.9.3 NLRP3 may contribute to airway hyperreactivity in asthma, allergy and obesity .......................................................................................................... 117 1.9.4 The NLRP3 inflammasome is critically activated in acute lung injury ................... 122 1.9.5 The NLRP3 inflammasome drives fibrotic changes in pulmonary fibrosis ............ 126 1.9.6 NLRP3 inflammasome signaling
Recommended publications
  • The Role of Streptococcal and Staphylococcal Exotoxins and Proteases in Human Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections
    toxins Review The Role of Streptococcal and Staphylococcal Exotoxins and Proteases in Human Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections Patience Shumba 1, Srikanth Mairpady Shambat 2 and Nikolai Siemens 1,* 1 Center for Functional Genomics of Microbes, Department of Molecular Genetics and Infection Biology, University of Greifswald, D-17489 Greifswald, Germany; [email protected] 2 Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-3834-420-5711 Received: 20 May 2019; Accepted: 10 June 2019; Published: 11 June 2019 Abstract: Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) are critical clinical conditions characterized by extensive necrosis of any layer of the soft tissue and systemic toxicity. Group A streptococci (GAS) and Staphylococcus aureus are two major pathogens associated with monomicrobial NSTIs. In the tissue environment, both Gram-positive bacteria secrete a variety of molecules, including pore-forming exotoxins, superantigens, and proteases with cytolytic and immunomodulatory functions. The present review summarizes the current knowledge about streptococcal and staphylococcal toxins in NSTIs with a special focus on their contribution to disease progression, tissue pathology, and immune evasion strategies. Keywords: Streptococcus pyogenes; group A streptococcus; Staphylococcus aureus; skin infections; necrotizing soft tissue infections; pore-forming toxins; superantigens; immunomodulatory proteases; immune responses Key Contribution: Group A streptococcal and Staphylococcus aureus toxins manipulate host physiological and immunological responses to promote disease severity and progression. 1. Introduction Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) are rare and represent a more severe rapidly progressing form of soft tissue infections that account for significant morbidity and mortality [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Report from the 26Th Meeting on Toxinology,“Bioengineering Of
    toxins Meeting Report Report from the 26th Meeting on Toxinology, “Bioengineering of Toxins”, Organized by the French Society of Toxinology (SFET) and Held in Paris, France, 4–5 December 2019 Pascale Marchot 1,* , Sylvie Diochot 2, Michel R. Popoff 3 and Evelyne Benoit 4 1 Laboratoire ‘Architecture et Fonction des Macromolécules Biologiques’, CNRS/Aix-Marseille Université, Faculté des Sciences-Campus Luminy, 13288 Marseille CEDEX 09, France 2 Institut de Pharmacologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Université Côte d’Azur, CNRS, Sophia Antipolis, 06550 Valbonne, France; [email protected] 3 Bacterial Toxins, Institut Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France; michel-robert.popoff@pasteur.fr 4 Service d’Ingénierie Moléculaire des Protéines (SIMOPRO), CEA de Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +33-4-9182-5579 Received: 18 December 2019; Accepted: 27 December 2019; Published: 3 January 2020 1. Preface This 26th edition of the annual Meeting on Toxinology (RT26) of the SFET (http://sfet.asso.fr/ international) was held at the Institut Pasteur of Paris on 4–5 December 2019. The central theme selected for this meeting, “Bioengineering of Toxins”, gave rise to two thematic sessions: one on animal and plant toxins (one of our “core” themes), and a second one on bacterial toxins in honour of Dr. Michel R. Popoff (Institut Pasteur, Paris, France), both sessions being aimed at emphasizing the latest findings on their respective topics. Nine speakers from eight countries (Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Russia, Singapore, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America) were invited as international experts to present their work, and other researchers and students presented theirs through 23 shorter lectures and 27 posters.
    [Show full text]
  • Venom Week 2012 4Th International Scientific Symposium on All Things Venomous
    17th World Congress of the International Society on Toxinology Animal, Plant and Microbial Toxins & Venom Week 2012 4th International Scientific Symposium on All Things Venomous Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, July 8 – 13, 2012 1 Table of Contents Section Page Introduction 01 Scientific Organizing Committee 02 Local Organizing Committee / Sponsors / Co-Chairs 02 Welcome Messages 04 Governor’s Proclamation 08 Meeting Program 10 Sunday 13 Monday 15 Tuesday 20 Wednesday 26 Thursday 30 Friday 36 Poster Session I 41 Poster Session II 47 Supplemental program material 54 Additional Abstracts (#298 – #344) 61 International Society on Thrombosis & Haemostasis 99 2 Introduction Welcome to the 17th World Congress of the International Society on Toxinology (IST), held jointly with Venom Week 2012, 4th International Scientific Symposium on All Things Venomous, in Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, July 8 – 13, 2012. This is a supplement to the special issue of Toxicon. It contains the abstracts that were submitted too late for inclusion there, as well as a complete program agenda of the meeting, as well as other materials. At the time of this printing, we had 344 scientific abstracts scheduled for presentation and over 300 attendees from all over the planet. The World Congress of IST is held every three years, most recently in Recife, Brazil in March 2009. The IST World Congress is the primary international meeting bringing together scientists and physicians from around the world to discuss the most recent advances in the structure and function of natural toxins occurring in venomous animals, plants, or microorganisms, in medical, public health, and policy approaches to prevent or treat envenomations, and in the development of new toxin-derived drugs.
    [Show full text]
  • Colchicine Acts Selectively in the Liver to Induce Hepatokines That Inhibit Myeloid Cell Activation
    ARTICLES https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-021-00366-y Colchicine acts selectively in the liver to induce hepatokines that inhibit myeloid cell activation Jui-Hsia Weng 1 ✉ , Peter David Koch1,2, Harding H. Luan3, Ho-Chou Tu4, Kenichi Shimada 1, Iris Ngan3, Richard Ventura3, Ruomu Jiang1 and Timothy J. Mitchison 1 ✉ Colchicine has served as a traditional medicine for millennia and remains widely used to treat inflammatory and other disor- ders. Colchicine binds tubulin and depolymerizes microtubules, but it remains unclear how this mechanism blocks myeloid cell recruitment to inflamed tissues. Here we show that colchicine inhibits myeloid cell activation via an indirect mechanism involv- ing the release of hepatokines. We find that a safe dose of colchicine depolymerizes microtubules selectively in hepatocytes but not in circulating myeloid cells. Mechanistically, colchicine triggers Nrf2 activation in hepatocytes, leading to secretion of anti-inflammatory hepatokines, including growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15). Nrf2 and GDF15 are required for the anti-inflammatory action of colchicine in vivo. Plasma from colchicine-treated mice inhibits inflammatory signalling in myeloid cells in a GDF15-dependent manner, by positive regulation of SHP-1 (PTPN6) phosphatase, although the precise molecular identities of colchicine-induced GDF15 and its receptor require further characterization. Our work shows that the efficacy and safety of colchicine depend on its selective action on hepatocytes, and reveals a new axis of liver–myeloid cell communication. Plasma GDF15 levels and myeloid cell SHP-1 activity may be useful pharmacodynamic biomarkers of colchicine action. nflammation involves local activation and extravasation of circu- including signalling proteins termed hepatokines15.
    [Show full text]
  • Hemolysin CB with Human C5a Receptors Γ Valentine Leukocidin
    Differential Interaction of the Staphylococcal Toxins Panton−Valentine Leukocidin and γ -Hemolysin CB with Human C5a Receptors This information is current as András N. Spaan, Ariën Schiepers, Carla J. C. de Haas, of October 1, 2021. Davy D. J. J. van Hooijdonk, Cédric Badiou, Hugues Contamin, François Vandenesch, Gérard Lina, Norma P. Gerard, Craig Gerard, Kok P. M. van Kessel, Thomas Henry and Jos A. G. van Strijp J Immunol 2015; 195:1034-1043; Prepublished online 19 June 2015; Downloaded from doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1500604 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/195/3/1034 http://www.jimmunol.org/ Supplementary http://www.jimmunol.org/content/suppl/2015/06/19/jimmunol.150060 Material 4.DCSupplemental References This article cites 46 articles, 14 of which you can access for free at: http://www.jimmunol.org/content/195/3/1034.full#ref-list-1 Why The JI? Submit online. by guest on October 1, 2021 • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication *average Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2015 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,174.999 B2 Du Bois Et Al
    US009 174999B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,174.999 B2 Du Bois et al. (45) Date of Patent: Nov. 3, 2015 (54) METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR Arakawa O, Nishio S. Noguchi T. Shida Y and Onoue Y. A New STUDYING, IMAGING, AND TREATING PAIN Saxitoxin Analogue from aXanthid Crab Atergatis Floridus. Toxicon 1995; 33:1577-1584. (75) Inventors: Justin Du Bois, Palo Alto, CA (US); Dell'Aversano C. Walter JA, Burton IW. Stirling DJ, Fattorusso E and John Mulcahy, Stanford, CA (US); Quilliam MA. Isolation and Structure Elucidation of New and Brian Andresen, Menlo Park, CA (US); Unusual Saxitoxin Analogues from Mussels. J. Nat. Prod. 2008; David C. Yeomans, Sunnyvale, CA T1:1518-1523. (US); Sandip Biswal, Stanford, CA (US) Vale P. Metabolites of saxitoxin analogues in bivalves contaminated by Gymnodinium catenatum. Toxicon 2010; 55:162-165. (73) Assignee: The Board of Trustees of the Leland Koehn FE. Hall S, Wichmann CF, Schnoes HK, Reichardt PB. Stanford Junior University, Palo Alto, Dinoflagellate neurotoxins related to saxitoxin: structure and latent CA (US) activity of toxins B1 and B2. 1982; 23:2247-2248. Onodera H, Satake M, Oshima Y. Yasumoto T and Carmichael W.W. (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this New Saxitoxin Analogues from the Freshwater Filamentous patent is extended or adjusted under 35 Cyanobacterium Lyngbya wollei. Natural Toxins 1997; 5:146-151. U.S.C. 154(b) by 277 days. Vale P. New Saxitoxin analogues in the marine environment: devel opments in toxin chemistry, detection and biotransformation during (21) Appl. No.: 12/800,053 the 2000s.
    [Show full text]
  • Panton-Valentine Leukocidin: a Review
    Reprinted from www.antimicrobe.org Panton-Valentine Leukocidin: A Review Marina Morgan F.R.C.Path. Venkata Meka, M.D. Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) is a bi-component, pore-forming exotoxin produced by some strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Also termed a synergohymenotropic toxin (i.e. acts on membranes through the synergistic activity of 2 non-associated secretory proteins, component S and component F) (9), PVL toxin components assemble into heptamers on the neutrophil membrane, resulting in lytic pores and membrane damage. Injection of purified PVL induces histamine release from human basophilic granulocytes, enzymes (such as β-glucuronidase and lysozyme), chemotactic factors (such as leukotriene B4 and interleukin (IL-) 8), and oxygen metabolites from human neutrophilic granulocytes (5). Intradermal injection of purified PVL in rabbits causes severe inflammatory lesions with capillary dilation, chemotaxis, polymorphonuclear (PMN) infiltration, PMN karyorrhexis, and skin necrosis (17). PVL production is encoded by two contiguous and cotranscribed genes, lukS-PV and lukF-PV, found in a prophage segment integrated in the S. aureus chromosome (9). Traditionally some 2% of S. aureus produce PVL, however in certain groups in close contact with each other, such as military personnel, prisoners, and families of patients with infected skin lesions, skin to skin transmission is common resulting in a far higher carriage rates. Different PVL-positive S. aureus strains carry differing phage sequences, which can move into other strains methicillin and resistant, empowering them with PVl production genes (15). Many patients with PVL-positive necrotizing pneumonia have a preceding illness resembling influenza, with rigors pyrexia and myalgia. Expression of most S.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Bacterial Toxins in the Lungs
    toxins Review Impact of Bacterial Toxins in the Lungs 1,2,3, , 4,5, 3 2 Rudolf Lucas * y, Yalda Hadizamani y, Joyce Gonzales , Boris Gorshkov , Thomas Bodmer 6, Yves Berthiaume 7, Ueli Moehrlen 8, Hartmut Lode 9, Hanno Huwer 10, Martina Hudel 11, Mobarak Abu Mraheil 11, Haroldo Alfredo Flores Toque 1,2, 11 4,5,12,13, , Trinad Chakraborty and Jürg Hamacher * y 1 Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA; hfl[email protected] 2 Vascular Biology Center, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA; [email protected] 3 Department of Medicine and Division of Pulmonary Critical Care Medicine, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA; [email protected] 4 Lungen-und Atmungsstiftung, Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; [email protected] 5 Pneumology, Clinic for General Internal Medicine, Lindenhofspital Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland 6 Labormedizinisches Zentrum Dr. Risch, Waldeggstr. 37 CH-3097 Liebefeld, Switzerland; [email protected] 7 Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada; [email protected] 8 Pediatric Surgery, University Children’s Hospital, Zürich, Steinwiesstrasse 75, CH-8032 Zürch, Switzerland; [email protected] 9 Insitut für klinische Pharmakologie, Charité, Universitätsklinikum Berlin, Reichsstrasse 2, D-14052 Berlin, Germany; [email protected] 10 Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Voelklingen Heart Center, 66333
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple Roles of Staphylococcus Aureus Enterotoxins: Pathogenicity, Superantigenic Activity, and Correlation to Antibiotic Resistance
    Toxins 2010, 2, 2117-2131; doi:10.3390/toxins2082117 OPEN ACCESS toxins ISSN 2072-6651 www.mdpi.com/journal/toxins Review Multiple Roles of Staphylococcus aureus Enterotoxins: Pathogenicity, Superantigenic Activity, and Correlation to Antibiotic Resistance Elena Ortega, Hikmate Abriouel, Rosario Lucas and Antonio Gálvez * Area de Microbiología, Departamento de Ciencias de la Salud, Facultad de Ciencias Experimentales, Universidad de Jaén, 23071-Jaén, Spain; E-Mails: [email protected] (E.O.); [email protected] (H.A.); [email protected] (R.L.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +34 953 212160; Fax: +34 953 212943. Received: 3 July 2010 / Accepted: 9 August 2010 / Published: 10 August 2010 Abstract: Heat-stable enterotoxins are the most notable virulence factors associated with Staphylococcus aureus, a common pathogen associated with serious community and hospital acquired diseases. Staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEs) cause toxic shock-like syndromes and have been implicated in food poisoning. But SEs also act as superantigens that stimulate T-cell proliferation, and a high correlation between these activities has been detected. Most of the nosocomial S. aureus infections are caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains, and those resistant to quinolones or multiresistant to other antibiotics are emerging, leaving a limited choice for their control. This review focuses on these diverse roles of SE, their possible correlations and the influence in disease progression and therapy. Keywords: enterotoxins; Staphylococcus aureus; superantigens; MRSA; immune response 1. Introduction Staphylococcus aureus is a common pathogen associated with serious community and hospital acquired diseases and has for a long time been considered as a major problem of Public Health [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Panton-Valentine Leukocidin Exotoxin Found in Intermediate Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Samples on Belmont University’S Campus
    Panton-Valentine Leukocidin Exotoxin Found in Intermediate Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Samples on Belmont University’s Campus Jordan D. Helms and Jennifer T. Thomas, Ph.D. Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), a pathogenic strain of Staphylococcus aureus, results in thousands of infections and associated deaths each year. A strain of MRSA, USA300, has been identified as the most common cause of skin and soft tissue infections acquired from the community in the United States. The goal of our study is to determine the prevalence of the USA300 strain, responsible for new community-associated MRSA infections, on Belmont University’s campus via PCR detection of the Panton-Valentine Leukocidin (PVL) gene, a bacterial toxin. We collected isolates from different locations on Belmont’s campus, confirmed them as MRSA using Gram staining, coagulase testing, and the use of the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion assay. Bacterial DNA was isolated and PCR analysis performed to identify the PVL gene. We found PVL in Intermediate Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates. This is surprising because the presence of PVL causes otherwise harmless Staph infections more severe and lethal if left untreated. In addition, there is very little literature on Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus infections alone, as well as its relationship with PVL. The presence of this exotoxin on Belmont’s campus puts individuals at greater risk of a severe infection and proper preventive protocol needs to be followed to ensure safety. INTRODUCTION Staphylococcus aureus and Staph infections Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a gram-positive, coccus shaped bacterium. Microscopically, it appears in tetrads and grapelike clusters and forms large, convex, golden colonies on growth plates (aureus is Latin for “gold”).
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Identification of Pathogenic Micro-Organisms and Their Toxic Proteins
    Europäisches Patentamt *EP001308520A2* (19) European Patent Office Office européen des brevets (11) EP 1 308 520 A2 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION (43) Date of publication: (51) Int Cl.7: C12Q 1/04, G01N 33/68, 07.05.2003 Bulletin 2003/19 G01N 33/542, G01N 33/543, G01N 33/50 (21) Application number: 02021593.5 (22) Date of filing: 27.09.2002 (84) Designated Contracting States: (72) Inventors: AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR • Powers, Linda S. IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR Logan, Utah 84321 (US) Designated Extension States: • Ellis, Walther R., Jr. AL LT LV MK RO SI Logan, Utah 84321 (US) • Lloyd, Christopher R. (30) Priority: 01.11.2001 US 999159 Logan, Utah 84341 (US) (71) Applicant: MicroBioSystems Limited Partnership (74) Representative: Bauer, Wulf, Dr. Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001 (US) Bayenthalgürtel 15 50968 Köln (Marienburg) (DE) (54) Taxonomic identification of pathogenic micro-organisms and their toxic proteins (57) The present invention describes a method for teins, outer membrane proteins and conjugated lipids. the binding of pathogenic microorganisms and their tox- Non-binding components of the solution to be analyzed ic proteins with ligands that have been covalently teth- are separated from the bound fraction and binding is ered at some distance from the surface of a substrate: confirmed by detection of the analyte via microscopy, distances of at least fifteen Å are required for microor- fluorescence, epifluorescence, luminescence, phos- ganism binding ligand tethers and at least six Å are re- phorescence, radioactivity, or optical absorbance. By quired for protein binding ligand tethers.
    [Show full text]
  • Nucleic Acid Approaches to Toxin Detection Nicola Chatwell
    Nucleic Acid Approaches To Toxin Detection Nicola Chatwell, BSc Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Master of Philosophy December 2013 ABSTRACT PCR is commonly used for detecting contamination of foods by toxigenic bacteria. However, it is unknown whether it is suitable for detecting toxins in samples which are unlikely to contain bacterial cells, such as purified biological weapons. Quantitative real-time PCR assays were developed for amplification of the genes encoding Clostridium botulinum neurotoxins A to F, Staphylococcal enteroxin B (SEB), ricin, and C. perfringens alpha toxin. Botulinum neurotoxins, alpha toxin, ricin and V antigen from Yersinia pestis were purified at Dstl using methods including precipitation, ion exchange, FPLC, affinity chromatography and gel filtration. Additionally, toxin samples of unknown purity were purchased from a commercial supplier. Q-PCR analysis showed that DNA was present in crudely prepared toxin samples. However, the majority of purified or commercially produced toxins were not detectable by PCR. Therefore, it is unlikely that PCR will serve as a primary toxin detection method in future. Immuno-PCR was investigated as an alternative, more direct method of toxin detection. Several iterations of the method were investigated, each using a different way of labelling the secondary antibody with DNA. It was discovered that the way in which antibodies are labelled with DNA is crucial to the success of the method, as the DNA concentration must be optimised in order to fully take advantage of signal amplification without causing excessive background noise. In general terms immuno-PCR was demonstrated to offer increased sensitivity over conventional ELISA, once fully optimised, making it particularly useful for biological weapons analysis.
    [Show full text]