DOCSLIB.ORG

Orthanc: Free Ecosystem for Medical Imaging

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Orthanc: Free Ecosystem for Medical Imaging Free ecosystem for medical imaging 1 2 Worldwide explosion of medical images Belgium (2013): 33 millions of imaging studies for 11 millions of people CT + MRI + PET-CT Reason: Multimodal and longitudinal imaging (oncology, cardiovascular diseases, surgery, neurology...) 3 The hype: AI for medical imaging 4 The reality: It’s still Jurassic Park! 5 Sharing images (basic need) is painful inside hospitals hospitals to patients between hospitals among skilled workers 6 Some terminology: Imaging flows for radiology Everything is driven by software through the DICOM standard! 7 The real-world difficulties 8 Pain 1: Interoperability and lock-in Good news: A single worldwide standard in open-access! • The DICOM standard is very complex, both for users and developers. • Many specialized vendors, with costly, proprietary and monolithic ecosystems ⇒ highriskof high risk of lock-in, few agility. • Interoperability is checked in “Connectathons” where vendors meet (N² complexity) ⇒ highriskof no reference implementation. • Not every PACS comes with teleradiology (remote expertise) ⇒ highriskof need to combine vendors. • Few IT expertise in hospitals about imaging⇒ highriskof need to share knowledge. Heterogeneous modalities ▶ very problematic in emerging economies! 9 Pain 2: The PACS is focused on radiology • Hard to retrieve and access the raw DICOM files. • The PACS must be interfaced with specialized software (nuclear medicine, radiotherapy, dentistry, neurosurgery…). • Multitude of files, as images are split slice-by-slice (one typical 3D image = 1000 DICOM files, 500MB) ⇒ highriskof need for standalone server to ensure continuity of care (cancers, move, rare diseases...). • Patients and skilled workers haven’t access to professional tools at home, besides basic viewers. Especially problematic for patient empowerment and training! 10 Pain 3: Automation of imaging workflow University Hospital of Liège: 300 modalities Every hospital redevelops its own scripts ▶ huge cost inefficiency! 12 • Get back in control of imaging workflows • Need for automation • Interfacing specialized software • Academic: Research, teaching, QA 2011 • PACS without a RIS and reporting (VNA) • Focused on simplicity and portability • Built-in support of Web technologies • Industrial grade 2012 • Libre software (GPL/AGPL) Virtual & Lightweight Rest API cross-platform Extensible 13 Orthanc in the hospital: Ancillary PACS 14 Web interface in action • Transparent indexing: Patient → Study → Series → Instance. • Preview 2D images. • Send to other modalities in one click. • Inspect medical data, ZIP, anonymize... 15 Orthanc as a microservice for medical imaging External applications REST API DICOM Modalities Lua scripts Plugin SDK Database engines Embedded Web applications (default: SQLite) (servlets) 16 Free and open-source plugins for Orthanc Whole-slide imaging Basic teleradiology Advanced teleradiology DICOMweb 17 Some external applications using the REST API Diabetes screening (fundus) Quality control (ImageJ) Pharmaceutical studies (anonymization) Teaching and research (download from PACS) 18 Stone of Orthanc • Innovative C++ library to render medical images • Fully CPU-based for maximum portability • Compatible with WebAssembly • Support advanced data: PET-CT fusion, MPR, doses, contours… • Goal = quick development: build a new viewer in some days Will be at the core of our next generation of viewers 19 Reference paper in open-access 21 Positive feedback from the community 2014 Award for the Advancement of Free Software 2015 Best e-Health project (from the Belgian industry) ● One of the two main free PACS around the world (with dcm4che) ● > 200,000 downloads ● > 550 members on the forum ● > 1,200 threads on the forum ● > 170,000 lines of C++ code (35 men-years effort) ● Availability on popular NAS (QNAP and Synology) ● Docker-friendly + Linux Standard Base (LSB) binaries ● Official packages for Debian and Fedora (no openSUSE yet ;-) ) 22 First spin-off of University Hospital of Liège (2015) 23 Business model Support Custom developments Packaged versions of Orthanc (independent centers) (R&D for industry) (for e.g. EU/USA hospitals) 2 FTE on Orthanc (virtuous circle) 24 Services (1/3): Automating exchanges between hospitals Oncology, continuity of care, rationalization of studies, ionizing radiations, clinical research… Interface for reconciliation 25 Services (2/3): ORU-PACA = Telestrokes in France (55 emergency departments) 26 Services (3/3): ERN = Tele-expertise for rare diseases 27 References (80 clients in 12 countries) (17 installations in 4 countries) 28 Conclusions 30 Summary ● “Backbone” software for medical imaging (VNA). ● Open-source, lightweight, scriptable, extensible. ● Originates from real-world, clinical needs. ● Large, worldwide community of users. ● Commercial partner of the Orthanc project. ● First spin-off company of the University Hospital of Liège. ● Open-source business model selling services to the industry. ● Sells packaged versions of Orthanc to hospitals. 31 Interfacing with GNU Health Access to Orthanc Web viewer from the patient record Populate DICOM modality worklist (schedule studies) Drive transfers to/from other centers 32 Perspectives for emerging economies (portable X-rays) + = (1) Low-cost PACS in (2) Collect images, analyze (3) Remote expertise remote locations in hospitals (cf. WWI) with Web viewers (+ open AI algorithms for auto-diagnostics) 3G, satellite Transfers accelerator (4) Transmit images on plugin (cf. BitTorrent) bad connectivity.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tackling the Beast Using GNU Health to Help Governments in the Fight
    Tackling the Beast Tackling the beast Using GNU Health to help governments in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic Dr. Luis Falcon, MD, MSc [email protected] Flatten the Curve Summit April 21st, 2020 Dr. Luis Falcon, M.D. Freedom and Equity in Healthcare GNU Health is, first and foremost, a Social Project ...with really cool technology Flatten the Curve Summit April 21st, 2020 Dr. Luis Falcon, M.D. From GNU Solidario Group pic from GNUHealthCon 2018 in Canary Islands Flatten the Curve Summit April 21st, 2020 Dr. Luis Falcon, M.D. Official GNU Package Official GNU Package, from the Free Software Foundation Open Documentation Relies on free technolog! Friendly communit! Flatten the Curve Summit April 21st, 2020 Dr. Luis Falcon, M.D. GNU Health Ecosystem Flatten the Curve Summit April 21st, 2020 Dr. Luis Falcon, M.D. GNU Health ecosystem Flatten the Curve Summit April 21st, 2020 Dr. Luis Falcon, M.D. Projects from the GNU Health ecosystem Flatten the Curve Summit April 21st, 2020 Dr. Luis Falcon, M.D. GNU Health snapshots Flatten the Curve Summit April 21st, 2020 Dr. Luis Falcon, M.D. ... GNU Health + Orthanc Flatten the Curve Summit April 21st, 2020 Dr. Luis Falcon, M.D. ... GNU Health Federation in Cancer research Flatten the Curve Summit April 21st, 2020 Dr. Luis Falcon, M.D. GNU Health is about Social Medicine: People before Patients Flatten the Curve Summit April 21st, 2020 Dr. Luis Falcon, M.D. Health is a Fundamental Human Right “No one should get sick and die just because they are poor, or because they cannot access the health services they need.” World Health Organization The right to health for all people means that everyone should have access to the health services they need, when and where they need them, without suffering financial hardship.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Various Techniques for Knowledge Mining in Electronic Health Records
    European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine ISSN 2515-8260 Volume 7, Issue 11, 2020 Analysis of various techniques for Knowledge Mining in Electronic Health Records 1V.Deepa, 2P.Mohamed Fathimal 1Research Scholar , 2 Assistant Professor ,SRM Institute of Science & Technology, Vadapalani ,Chennai Abstract With the fast development of digital communication all over the world ,each domain including healthcare sector has led to new dimension . “Health Informatics,” are the term used to coin application of IT for better healthcare services. Its applications helps to maintain the health record of individuals, in digital form known as the Electronic Health Record .This paper reviews the Electronic health records (EHR) in healthcare organizations. These digital records can help to support clinical activities that have the ability to improve quality of health and to reduce the costs. The aim of this paper is to study the detail analysis of the structure and the components of electronic health record.This paper reviews different techniques for handling the information in the text and different components of the electronic health record include daily charting, physical assessment, medication, discharge history, physical examination and test procedures. Keywords: Physical Assessment, Survey medication, Semantics, patience, Information Quality, Health care policy planning I INTRODUCTION In healthcare domain, more than 1100 electronic health record vendors are available all over the world. National policy and guidelines have been framed for EHR dealers and medical benefits. EHR collects real time medical data which stores patient’s information in a digital format like a history chart. As all the information are accessible in a single file, extraction of medical data from EMRs (electronic medical records) for analysis is very effective for the analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating the Practical Use of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of Airflow in the Nasal Cavity and Paranasal Sinuses NOSE Version 1.0 2018-08-30
    NOSE Pilot Study Investigating the Practical Use of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of Airflow in the NNOSEasal Cavity and Paranasal Sinuses NOSE Pilot Study Investigating the Practical Use of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of Airflow in the Nasal Cavity and Paranasal Sinuses NOSE Version 1.0 2018-08-30 NOSE Pilot Study Investigating the Practical Use of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation Version 1.0 of Airflow in the Nasal Cavity and Paranasal Sinuses NOSE Pilot Study Investigating the Practical Use of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of Airflow in the Nasal Cavity and Paranasal Sinuses Project Number 1000043433 Project Title NOSE Pilot Study Document Reference Investigating the Practical Use of Computational Date 2018-08-30 Title Fluid Dynamics Simulation of Airflow in the Nasal Cavity and Paranasal Sinuses Document Name NOSE_PS_FINAL_v1 Version Draft draft final Restrictions public internal restricted : Distribution Steirische Forschungsförderung Authors Koch Walter, Koch Gerda, Vitiello Massimo, Ortiz Ramiro, Stockklauser Jutta, Benda Odo Abstract The NOSE Pilot study evaluated the technical and scientific environment required for establishing a service portfolio that includes CFD simulation and 3D visualization services for ENT specialists. For this purpose the state-of-the-art of these technologies and their use for upper airways diagnostics were analysed. Keywords Rhinology, Computational Fluid Dynamics, 3D Visualization, Clinical Pathways, Service Center, Knowledge Base Document Revisions Version Date Author(s) Description of Change 1.0 2018-08-30 Koch Walter, Koch Final Version Gerda, Vitiello Massimo, Ortiz NOSERamiro, Stockklauser Jutta, Benda Odo 2018-08-30 Seite 3 / 82 Copyright © AIT ForschungsgesmbH NOSE_PS_FINAL_v1 NOSE Pilot Study Investigating the Practical Use of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation Version 1.0 of Airflow in the Nasal Cavity and Paranasal Sinuses Table of Contents Acknowledgments ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Open-Source Electronic Health Record Systems Based on Functional and User Performance Criteria
    Original Article Healthc Inform Res. 2019 April;25(2):89-98. https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2019.25.2.89 pISSN 2093-3681 • eISSN 2093-369X Comparison of Open-Source Electronic Health Record Systems Based on Functional and User Performance Criteria Saptarshi Purkayastha1, Roshini Allam1, Pallavi Maity1, Judy W. Gichoya2 1Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA 2Dotter Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA Objectives: Open-source Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems have gained importance. The main aim of our research is to guide organizational choice by comparing the features, functionality, and user-facing system performance of the five most popular open-source EHR systems. Methods: We performed qualitative content analysis with a directed approach on recently published literature (2012–2017) to develop an integrated set of criteria to compare the EHR systems. The functional criteria are an integration of the literature, meaningful use criteria, and the Institute of Medicine’s functional requirements of EHR, whereas the user-facing system performance is based on the time required to perform basic tasks within the EHR system. Results: Based on the Alexa web ranking and Google Trends, the five most popular EHR systems at the time of our study were OSHERA VistA, GNU Health, the Open Medical Record System (OpenMRS), Open Electronic Medical Record (OpenEMR), and OpenEHR. We also found the trends in popularity of the EHR systems and the locations where they were more popular than others. OpenEMR met all the 32 functional criteria, OSHERA VistA met 28, OpenMRS met 12 fully and 11 partially, OpenEHR-based EHR met 10 fully and 3 partially, and GNU Health met the least with only 10 criteria fully and 2 partially.
    [Show full text]
  • Bafia District Hospital (Cameroon) Electronic Medical Record (EMR) GNU Health Deployment
    Bafia District Hospital (Cameroon) Electronic Medical Record (EMR) GNU Health Deployment EMILIEN FOUDA Agenda 01 Background 02 Objectives 03 EMR Implementation Steps 04 Data Analysis end (Feb-April 2018) 05 The impact of GNU Health in the improvment of Health Situation at Bafia District Hospital 03/12/2018 EMR Deployment in Bafia District Hospital in Cameroon 2 Background CAMEROON IS A COUNTRY IN CENTRAL AFRICA SURFACE AREA : 475 650 KM² REGIONS: TEN (10) NUMBER OF DEPARTMENTS : 58 NUMBER OF LOCAL COUNCILS 360 NUMBER OF DISTRICT HOSPITAL FUNCTIONNAL: 201 TOTAL POPULATION (2018): 24 863 337 habitants. 03/12/2018 | Title of the presentation 3 Background Bafia District Hospital (HDB) is located in the center region of Cameroon, precisely in the Mbam- Inoubou division where is the major health facility (reference hospital) and covers a population of 200,000; It situated along side the road linking Yaounde to Bafoussam which are two main cities. The Yaounde to Bafoussam road is one of the highly accidental in the country, and most of the time people injured are transferred to Bafia District Hospital. 03/12/2018 | Title of the presentation 4 Background The Bafia District Hospital covers a population of 164 000 inhabitants including 19 other health center. This center receives outpatient 1200 to 1500 per month. The capacity of in patients is 186 beds. 03/12/2018 | Title of the presentation 5 Background HUMAN RESOURCES The Bafia District Hospital have 18 services with 186 beds. The Hospital has 118 staff in all categories (60 medical and health
    [Show full text]
  • Open Source Et Gestion De L'information Médicale : Aperçu Des Projets Existants
    Open source et gestion de l'information médicale : aperçu des projets existants Ateliers CISP Club 2011 – Alexandre BRULET Open Source : bref historique... 1969 : UNIX (Bell Labs°) 1975 : distribué à des universités pour « fins éducatives » avec les codes sources... 1977 : projet BSD 1984 : projet GNU (R. Stallman) (sources partagées) 1985 : Free Software Fondation (cadre légal – licence GPL) 1989 : licence BSD modifiée (open source) 1991 : noyau GNU/Linux ? OS dérivés (NetBSD, FreeBSD, SunOS ...) 1993 : Slackware 1993 : Debian 1994 : Red Hat > 50 OS dérivés > 100 OS dérivés 1998 : MPL (ex : SUSE) > 50 OS dérivés (Knopix, Ubuntu...) (Mandriva, Fedora ...) 1999 : licence Apache UNESCO 2004 : logiciels libres patrimoine de l'humanité (…) > 35 licences libres recensées sur wikipédia (PHP, Cecil, MIT, CPL, W3C, etc.) Open source : un fonctionnement communautaire ● La « pyramide » Linux : développeurs / 'maintainers' / chefs de projet sys USB net (...) L. Torvalds / A. Morton ● Système de «patchs» : publics, signés, discutés, soumis, (approuvés) ● Versions stables régulières et archivées (mirroirs) ● Système de «paquets» permettant la cohérence des OS ● Mode de fonctionnement repris par la plupart des distributions basées sur Linux ainsi que leurs « filles » : Debian → Ubuntu, Slackware → Zenwalk, RedHat → Fedora, etc. ● Idem pour les logiciels (xfce/gnome/kde, OOo, Gimp, Firefox, etc.) Le monde open source : un immense agrégat de communautés... OS OS OS Projets GNU OS OS OS Noyau OS OS OS Noyau OS OS Projets BSD Programme open source Programme propriétaire Système OS d'exploitation Quid des logiciels médicaux ? Petit tour du monde de l'open source médical à partir d'une liste proposée par Wikipédia. 1. Logiciels médicaux francophones : MedinTux ● Petite communauté depuis 2005 (marseille), licence CeCiLL ● DMI cabinet / hôpital - objectif = ergonomie ● Programmes serveurs et clients, consultation web possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of DICOM Viewer Software for Workflow Integration in Clinical Trials
    Evaluation of DICOM Viewer Software for Workflow Integration in Clinical Trials Daniel Haak1*, Charles-E. Page, Klaus Kabino, Thomas M. Deserno Department of Medical Informatics, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, 52057 Aachen, Germany ABSTRACT The digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) protocol is nowadays the leading standard for capture, exchange and storage of image data in medical applications. A broad range of commercial, free, and open source software tools supporting a variety of DICOM functionality exists. However, different from patient’s care in hospital, DICOM has not yet arrived in electronic data capture systems (EDCS) for clinical trials. Due to missing integration, even just the visualization of patient’s image data in electronic case report forms (eCRFs) is impossible. Four increasing levels for integration of DICOM components into EDCS are conceivable, raising functionality but also demands on interfaces with each level. Hence, in this paper, a comprehensive evaluation of 27 DICOM viewer software projects is performed, investigating viewing functionality as well as interfaces for integration. Concerning general, integration, and viewing requirements the survey involves the criteria (i) license, (ii) support, (iii) platform, (iv) interfaces, (v) two- dimensional (2D) and (vi) three-dimensional (3D) image viewing functionality. Optimal viewers are suggested for applications in clinical trials for 3D imaging, hospital communication, and workflow. Focusing on open source solutions, the viewers ImageJ and MicroView are superior for 3D visualization, whereas GingkoCADx is advantageous for hospital integration. Concerning workflow optimization in multi-centered clinical trials, we suggest the open source viewer Weasis. Covering most use cases, an EDCS and PACS interconnection with Weasis is suggested.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacting the Bioscience Progress by Backporting Software for Bio-Linux
    Impacting the bioscience progress by backporting software for Bio-Linux Sasa Paporovic [email protected] v0.9 What is Bio-Linux and what is it good for - also its drawbacks: If someone says to use or to have a Linux this is correct as like it is imprecise. It does not exist a Linux as full functional operating system by itself. What was originally meant by the term Linux was the operating system core[1]. The so called kernel, or in a case of a Linux operating system the Linux kernel. It is originally designed and programmed by Linus Torvalds, who is also today the developer in chef or to say it with his words, he is the “alpha-male” of all developers[2]. Anyway, what we have today are Distributions[3]. It has become common to call them simply “a Linux”. This means that there are organizations out there, mostly private, some funded and some other commercial, which gather all what is needed to design around the Linux kernel a full functional operating system. This targets mostly Software, but also web and service infrastructure. Some of them have a history that is nearly as long as the Linux kernel is alive, like Debian. Some others are younger like Ubuntu and some more others are very young, like Bio-Linux[4]. The last Linux, the Bio-Linux, especially its latest version Bio-Linux 7 we are focusing here[5]. In year 2006 Bio-Linux with the work of Tim Booth[42] and team gives its rising[6] and provide an operating system that was and still specialized in providing a bioinformatic specific software environment for the working needs in this corner of bioscience.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study from the Openmrs Open-Source Radiology Information System
    Journal of Digital Imaging (2018) 31:361–370 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-018-0088-5 A Platform for Innovation and Standards Evaluation: a Case Study from the OpenMRS Open-Source Radiology Information System Judy W. Gichoya1 & Marc Kohli2 & Larry Ivange3 & Teri S. Schmidt4 & Saptarshi Purkayastha5 Published online: 10 May 2018 # The Author(s) 2018 Abstract Open-source development can provide a platform for innovation by seeking feedback from community members as well as providing tools and infrastructure to test new standards. Vendors of proprietary systems may delay adoption of new standards until there are sufficient incentives such as legal mandates or financial incentives to encourage/mandate adoption. Moreover, open-source systems in healthcare have been widely adopted in low- and middle-income countries and can be used to bridge gaps that exist in global health radiology. Since 2011, the authors, along with a community of open-source contributors, have worked on developing an open-source radiology information system (RIS) across two communities—OpenMRS and LibreHealth. The main purpose of the RIS is to implement core radiology workflows, on which others can build and test new radiology standards. This work has resulted in three major releases of the system, with current architectural changes driven by changing technology, development of new standards in health and imaging informatics, and changing user needs. At their core, both these communities are focused on building general-purpose EHR systems, but based on user contributions from the fringes, we have been able to create an innovative system that has been used by hospitals and clinics in four different countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprar, Construir O Adaptar. ¿Cómo Decidir? Una Guía Para La Historia Clínica Electrónica Compartida
    ORIENTACIÓN Comprar, construir o adaptar. ¿Cómo decidir? Una guía para la historia clínica electrónica compartida (EHR) de código abierto Autores: Joaquin Blaya y Daniel Otzoy Coordinación: Luis Tejerina y Jennifer Nelson Diseño: www.souvenirme.com *Joaquin Blaya es parte del Consejo Directivo de OpenMRS, pero no tiene intereses financieros en OpenMRS ni con ninguno de los sistemas descritos en este reporte. Copyright © 2019 Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. Esta obra se en- cuentra sujeta a una licencia Creative Commons IGO 3.0 Reconocimien- to-NoComercial-SinObrasDerivadas (CC-IGO 3.0 BY-NC-ND) (http:// cre- ativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo/legalcode) y puede ser reproducida para cualquier uso no- comercial otorgando el reconocimien- to respectivo al BID. No se permiten obras derivadas. Cualquier disputa relacionada con el uso de las obras del BID que no pue- da resolverse amistosamente se someterá a arbitraje de conformidad con las reglas de la CNUDMI (UNCITRAL). El uso del nombre del BID para cualquier fin distinto al reconocimiento respectivo y el uso del logotipo del BID, no están autorizados por esta licencia CC-IGO y requieren de un acuerdo de licencia adicional. Note que el enlace URL incluye términos y condiciones adicionales de esta licencia. Las opiniones expresadas en esta publicación son de los autores y no ne- cesariamente reflejan el punto de vista del Banco Interamericano de Desa- rrollo, de su Directorio Ejecutivo ni de los países que representa. Comprar, construir o adaptar. ¿Cómo decidir? Una guía para
    [Show full text]
  • FOSDEM 2013 Schedule
    FOSDEM 2013 - Saturday 2013-02-02 (1/9) Janson K.1.105 Ferrer Chavanne Lameere H.1301 H.1302 H.1308 10:30 Welcome to FOSDEM 2013 10:45 11:00 How we made the Jenkins QEMU USB status report 2012 Rockbuild The neat guide to Fedora RPM LinuxonAndroid and SlapOS on Wayland for Application Developers community Packaging Android 11:15 11:30 CRIU: Checkpoint and Restore (mostly) In Userspace 11:45 Ubuntu Online Accounts for application developers 12:00 The Devil is in the Details Vtrill: Rbridges for Virtual PTXdist Building RPM packages from Git Emdedded distro shootout: buildroot Networking repositories with git-buildpackage vs. Debian Better software through user 12:15 research 12:30 Bringing Xen to CentOS-6 Sketching interactions 12:45 13:00 The Open Observatory of Network Porting Fedora to 64-bit ARM Coding Goûter A brief tutorial on Xen's advanced Guacamayo -- Building Multimedia Package management and creation ARM v7 State of the Body ↴ Interference systems security features Appliance with Yocto ↴ in Gentoo Linux ↴ 13:15 Spoiling and Counter-spoiling 13:30 oVirt Live Storage Migration - Under Modern CMake ↴ the Hood ↴ ZONE: towards a better news feed ↴ 13:45 FOSDEM 2013 - Saturday 2013-02-02 (2/9) H.1309 H.2213 H.2214 AW1.120 AW1.121 AW1.125 AW1.126 Guillissen 10:30 10:45 11:00 Metaphor and BDD XMPP 101 Storytelling FLOSS Welcome and Introduction The room open() process Scripting Apache OpenOffice: Welcome to the Perl d… Introductory Nutshell Programs Inheritance versus Roles (Writer, Calc, Impress) 11:15 Signal/Collect: Processing Large
    [Show full text]
  • Wsis Forum 2013 Agenda & Programme Brochure
    W o r l d S u m m i t o n t h e I n f o r m a t i o n S o c i e t y Strategic Partners AGENDA & PROGRAMME BROCHURE WSIS FORUM 2013 WSIS+10 Visioning Partner AGENDA & PROGRAMME BROCHURE AGENDA Partners for Specic Activities Hosted by: WSIS Forum: Organised by: Printed in Switzerland Geneva, 2013 www.wsis.org/forum WSIS Forum 2013 Programme Brochure WSIS Forum 2013: Outcome Document Disclaimer Please note the WSIS Forum 2013 Programme Brochure is a compilation of session descriptions submitted to the WSIS Secretariat by the organizations responsible for their respective sessions. ITU does not hold any responsibility for the session descriptions provided by the organizers of the sessions for WSIS Forum 2013. © ITU, 2013 International Telecommunication Union (ITU), Geneva 13 May Monday 09:00-10:30 Opening Ceremony (E/F/Passive A) Opening Handing Over of WSIS Project Prizes Ceremony Room 1&2, CICG 10:30-13:00 High-Level Opening Session High-Level Emerging Trends and Innovation in the ICT Ecosystem Opening (E/F/Passive A) Session Room 1&2, CICG 11:00-12:00 UNGIS Substantive Session: WSIS+10 and Post 2015 UNGIS (UNGIS Members only) Room E, ITU 12:15-13:00 Press Conference Press CICG Conference (Media only) WSIS Forum 2013: 13:00 Group Photograph In front of CICG 13:15-14:00 Lunch Break High-Level Lunch (on invitation only) 14:00-14:30 Exhibition Inauguration (Montbrilliant and Tower) Exhibition Coee by Kuwait (Montbrilliant) Inauguration AL C2 AL C9 IS Infrastructure Media WSIS Stocktaking Broadband Backbone Internet Universality: and WSIS Prizes
    [Show full text]