DOCSLIB.ORG

Guidelines for the Translocation of Threatened Plants in Australia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Guidelines for the Translocation of Threatened Plants in Australia Guidelines for the Translocation of Threatened Plants in Australia Third Edition Editors: L.E. Commander, D.J. Coates, L. Broadhurst, C.A. Offord, R.O. Makinson and M. Matthes © Australian Network for Plant Conservation, 2018 Information in this publication may be reproduced provided that any extracts are acknowledged National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry: Guidelines for the translocation of threatened plants in Australia. 3rd ed. ISBN-13: 978-0-9752191-3-3 1. Plant conservation - Australia. 2. Plant communities - Australia. 3. Endangered plants - Australia. I. Commander, Lucy Elizabeth, 1981- . II. Australian Network for Plant Conservation. 333.95320994 First Published 1997 Reprinted 1998 Second Edition 2004 Third Edition 2018 Cover design: TSR Hub Cover photograph: Translocation site of Banksia brownii in south-west WA. (Photo: A Cochrane). Printed by IPG Marketing Solutions, 25 Strathwyn Street, Brendale, QLD 4500 This publication should be cited as: Commander, L.E., Coates, D., Broadhurst, L., Offord, C.A., Makinson, R.O. and Matthes, M. (2018) Guidelines for the translocation of threatened plants in Australia. Third Edition. Australian Network for Plant Conservation, Canberra. For more information about the Australian Network for Plant Conservation please contact: ANPC National Office GPO Box 1777, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia Phone: + 61 (0)2 6250 9509 Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.anpc.asn.au Table of Contents Foreword ............................................................................................................................................................................................ix Dedication ..........................................................................................................................................................................................xi Acknowledgements .........................................................................................................................................................................xi Authors .............................................................................................................................................................................................xiii Chapter 1 – Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................1 1.1. Definition of translocation .............................................................................................................................................................1 1.2. Objectives and content of these guidelines ..............................................................................................................................1 1.3. Objectives of translocation programs ........................................................................................................................................ 2 1.3.1. Types of translocation actions ..................................................................................................................................................3 1.3.2. Sources of plants for translocation .........................................................................................................................................4 1.4. Translocations: why, when, where, what, who and how? ..................................................................................................... 4 1.4.1. History of plant translocation in Australia ..............................................................................................................................4 1.4.2. Overview of plant translocations: where, who, why and how? ......................................................................................5 1.5. Past translocation successes ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 Chapter 2 – Deciding whether to translocate .............................................................................................................................9 2.1. Conservation actions for species recovery, and how translocation may be part of a broader strategy ..................... 9 2.1.1. Management options available for threatened plants ..................................................................................................... 10 2.1.2. Factors driving translocation ................................................................................................................................................... 11 2.2. Benefits and risks associated with translocation ....................................................................................................................12 2.2.1. Benefits .........................................................................................................................................................................................12 2.2.2. Conservation translocation risks ............................................................................................................................................13 2.2.3. Mitigation translocation risks ...................................................................................................................................................14 2.3. Factors to consider when determining whether translocation is necessary ................................................................... 14 2.3.1. Taxonomy ....................................................................................................................................................................................14 2.3.2. Distribution ..................................................................................................................................................................................14 Box 2.1 – Steps involved in targeted surveys for populations of threatened plants .................................................15 2.3.3. Drivers of extinction risk and threatening processes ........................................................................................................15 2.3.4. Recipient sites .............................................................................................................................................................................16 2.3.5. Population persistence .............................................................................................................................................................17 2.3.6. Other means of increasing population size ........................................................................................................................18 2.3.7. Success of past translocation projects .................................................................................................................................18 2.3.8. Resource availability and cost .................................................................................................................................................19 2.4. Define the goals and objectives ................................................................................................................................................ 19 2.4.1. The ultimate goal .......................................................................................................................................................................19 2.4.2. Objectives and tracking progress .........................................................................................................................................20 2.4.3. What ‘number’ constitutes success?....................................................................................................................................20 2.4.4. Getting the most out of the translocation: Linking monitoring and actions .............................................................21 2.5. Decision making framework .......................................................................................................................................................21 2.6. Checklist ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 22 Case Studies ..........................................................................................................................................................................................24 Case Study 2.1 - A Ministerial condition mandating translocation .......................................................................................... 24 Case Study 2.2 - Learning from translocation failure .................................................................................................................. 25 Case Study 2.3 - Success and failure – different outcomes at different sites ......................................................................26 Chapter 3 – Pre-translocation assessment of biology and ecology .....................................................................................27 3.1. Recovery team or translocation working group involvement ............................................................................................ 27 3.2. Ecology .....................................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Threatened Plant Translocations Project Summary Project 4.3
    Threatened plant translocations Project Summary Project 4.3 Grevillea batrachioides Lesueur grevillea. Photo: Andrew Crawford B. brownii. Photo: D. Coates Lambertia orbifolia. Photo: Anne Cochrane Research in Brief Why is the There has been insufficient synthesis of information about translocation Translocations are being research needed? generally, and evaluating and increasingly used in threatened Translocations of threatened plants synthesising the current knowledge plant recovery programs. The have been carried out over the past will provide a critical resource for outcomes of past translocation three decades across southern improving the success and status programs have often been poorly Australia. This has included at least trajectory of threatened plant documented or unpublished. This 1000 separate translocations, translocation. In particular, guidance makes it hard to learn from the involving around 380 plant species. criteria for establishment, resilience past experiences, to adapt and and persistence are needed. improve techniques in response However, despite the increasing to outcomes or to determine if focus on translocation, there has Further, developing criteria for investments have been worthwhile. been little monitoring or assessment translocation success that are of whether these projects are adequate and measurable will allow As the number of plant achieving long-term success in change in a species’ conservation translocation projects increases, it terms of population persistence. status to be assessed and provide is becoming increasingly important a more rigorous foundation for to evaluate the success of these At the same time threats to plants recommending the down-listing or translocations with meaningful and plant communities are becoming de-listing of a species. and measurable criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents Below) with Family Name Provided
    1 Australian Plants Society Plant Table Profiles – Sutherland Group (updated August 2021) Below is a progressive list of all cultivated plants from members’ gardens and Joseph Banks Native Plants Reserve that have made an appearance on the Plant Table at Sutherland Group meetings. Links to websites are provided for the plants so that further research can be done. Plants are grouped in the categories of: Trees and large shrubs (woody plants generally taller than 4 m) Medium to small shrubs (woody plants from 0.1 to 4 m) Ground covers or ground-dwelling (Grasses, orchids, herbaceous and soft-wooded plants, ferns etc), as well as epiphytes (eg: Platycerium) Vines and scramblers Plants are in alphabetical order by botanic names within plants categories (see table of contents below) with family name provided. Common names are included where there is a known common name for the plant: Table of Contents Trees and Large shrubs........................................................................................................................... 2 Medium to small shrubs ...................................................................................................................... 23 Groundcovers and other ground‐dwelling plants as well as epiphytes. ............................................ 64 Vines and Scramblers ........................................................................................................................... 86 Sutherland Group http://sutherland.austplants.com.au 2 Trees and Large shrubs Acacia decurrens
    [Show full text]
  • Blandfordia Grandiflora R. Br
    i Ecology and evolution of self-fertilization in a perennial herb, Blandfordia grandiflora R. Br. (Liliaceae) by Mike Ramsey A thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of New England May 1995 Declaration I certify that the substance of this thesis has not already been submitted for any degree and is not being currently submitted for any other degree. I certify that the help received in preparing this thesis, and all sources used, have been acknowledged in this thesis. Mike Ramsey May 1995 Acknowledgements National Parks and Wildlife Service of New South Wales granted permits to conduct my field research at Gibraltar Range and Yuraygir National Parks. National Parks and Wildlife Services of New South Wales and Queensland, and the Forestry Commission of New South Wales provided permits for the geographic variation study of this project. My many thanks to Rod Holmes from the Glen Innes office of the National Parks and Wildlife Service of New South Wales for providing accommodation at Gibraltar Range; this made the many extended field trips and hence the overall project possible. Dr Steven 0. Shattuck of the Division of Entomolgy, C.S.I.R.O., Canberra kindly examined the ants that I have referred to in Chapter 8. The technical staffs of the Depts of Botany and Zoology provided untold assistance and organised facilities whenever it was possible. From Botany, I thank Mike Henderson and particularly Warren Sheather who provided a wealth of knowled ge about plants in general. From Zoology, I thank Becky Francis, Louise Percival, Sandy Hamdorf, David Dye, Zolton Enoch, Kieth Cornish and Wayne Higgins.
    [Show full text]
  • Ne Wsletter No . 92
    AssociationAustralian of NativeSocieties Plants for Growing Society (Australia)Australian IncPlants Ref No. ISSN 0725-8755 Newsletter No. 92 – August 2012 GSG Vic Programme 2012 GSG SE Qld Programme 2012 Leader: Neil Marriott Morning tea at 9.30am, meetings commence at 693 Panrock Reservoir Rd, Stawell, Vic. 3380 10.00am. For more information contact Bryson Phone: 03 5356 2404 or 0458 177 989 Easton on (07) 3121 4480 or 0402242180. Email: [email protected] Sunday, 26 August Contact Neil for queries about program for the year. This meeting has been cancelled as many members Any members who would like to visit the official have another function to attend over the weekend. collection, obtain cutting material or seed, assist in its maintenance, and stay in our cottage for a few days The October 2012 meeting – has been are invited to contact Neil. After the massive rains at replaced by a joint excursion through SEQ & the end of 2010 and the start of 2011 the conditions northern NSW commencing on Wednesday, 7 are perfect for large scale replanting of the collection. November 2012. GSG members planning to attend Offers of assistance would be most welcome. are asked to contact Jan Glazebrook & Dennis Cox Newsletter No. 92 No. Newsletter on Ph (07) 5546 8590 for full details closer to this Friday, 29 September to Monday, 1 October event. See also page 3 for more details. SUBJECT: Spring Grevillea Crawl Sunday, 25 November FRI ARVO: Meet at Neil and Wendy Marriott’s Panrock VENUE: Home of Robyn Wieck Ridge, 693 Panrock Reservoir Rd, Stawell Lot 4 Ajuga Court, Brookvale Park Oakey for welcome and wander around the HONE (07) 4691 2940 gardens.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstructing the Basal Angiosperm Phylogeny: Evaluating Information Content of Mitochondrial Genes
    55 (4) • November 2006: 837–856 Qiu & al. • Basal angiosperm phylogeny Reconstructing the basal angiosperm phylogeny: evaluating information content of mitochondrial genes Yin-Long Qiu1, Libo Li, Tory A. Hendry, Ruiqi Li, David W. Taylor, Michael J. Issa, Alexander J. Ronen, Mona L. Vekaria & Adam M. White 1Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, The University Herbarium, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1048, U.S.A. [email protected] (author for correspondence). Three mitochondrial (atp1, matR, nad5), four chloroplast (atpB, matK, rbcL, rpoC2), and one nuclear (18S) genes from 162 seed plants, representing all major lineages of gymnosperms and angiosperms, were analyzed together in a supermatrix or in various partitions using likelihood and parsimony methods. The results show that Amborella + Nymphaeales together constitute the first diverging lineage of angiosperms, and that the topology of Amborella alone being sister to all other angiosperms likely represents a local long branch attrac- tion artifact. The monophyly of magnoliids, as well as sister relationships between Magnoliales and Laurales, and between Canellales and Piperales, are all strongly supported. The sister relationship to eudicots of Ceratophyllum is not strongly supported by this study; instead a placement of the genus with Chloranthaceae receives moderate support in the mitochondrial gene analyses. Relationships among magnoliids, monocots, and eudicots remain unresolved. Direct comparisons of analytic results from several data partitions with or without RNA editing sites show that in multigene analyses, RNA editing has no effect on well supported rela- tionships, but minor effect on weakly supported ones. Finally, comparisons of results from separate analyses of mitochondrial and chloroplast genes demonstrate that mitochondrial genes, with overall slower rates of sub- stitution than chloroplast genes, are informative phylogenetic markers, and are particularly suitable for resolv- ing deep relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological Variation Within the Genus Blandfordia (Liliaceae) in Relation to Its Environment
    21 August 1992 Aust. Syst. Bot., 5, 373-85 Morphological Variation Within the Genus Blandfordia (Liliaceae) in Relation to Its Environment Carolyn L. PorterAB, David A. MorrisonA and Kristina A. JohnsonA *Department of Applied Biology, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, N.S.W. 2007, Australia. BCurrent address: National Herbarium of N.S.W., Mrs Macquarie's Road, Sydney, N.S.W. 2000, Australia. Abstract The taxa in Blandfordia are often difficult to separate morphologically. A multivariate morphometric analysis of data from both herbarium and field samples suggests that the genus consists of at least four polythetically distinct taxa, corresponding to the traditional concepts of B. cunninghamii Lindley, B. grandifora R.Br., B. nobilis Smith, and B. punicea (Labill.) Sweet. The morphological boundaries between most of these species are arbitrary but are closely related to a number of environmental variables. Due to large intra-population variability, discrimination between these taxa is possible only on the basis of a combination of attributes, notably leaf width and margin sculpturing, and flower length and diameter. The morphological distinction between B. punicea and the other species is clear and seems to be maintained by its geographical isolation. The distinction between B. grandiflora and B. cunninghamii is based on vegetative rather than floral attributes and is made difficult by phenotypic response of B. cunninghamii plants to light intensity. Gene flow between these two species appears to be restricted by their separate habitats. The distinction between B. grandiflora and B. nobilis is based on floral rather than vegetative attributes and is related to latitude with the species being more distinct in the area of parapatry than in the area of allopatry.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Annual Report Threatened Species And/Or Communities Recovery Team
    SUMMARY ANNUAL REPORT THREATENED SPECIES AND/OR COMMUNITIES RECOVERY TEAM PROGRAM INFORMATION Recovery Team name Moora District Threatened Flora (and Ecological Communities) Recovery Team Reporting Period (Calendar Calendar year 2008 Year) Current membership Member Representing CHAIR/EXEC Officer Benson Todd DEC, Moora District Rebecca Carter DEC, Moora District Leonie Monks DEC, Science Division Andrew Crawford DEC, Threatened Flora Seed Centre Andrew Brown DEC, Species and Communities Branch Monica Hunter DEC, Species and Communities Branch Rep Rotating Dandaragan Regional Herbarium Rep Rotating Jurien Bay Regional Herbarium Nigel Rowe/Anna Southerland Main Roads WA Alannah Sinden Downer EDI (road maintenance) Allan Tinker Community Representative, Shires of Irwin and Carnamah Malcolm Pumphrey LGA Representative, Shire of Carnamah Don and Joy Williams Community Representative, Shire of Coorow Kelvin Bean LGA Representative, Shire of Coorow Mike Harvey LGA Representative, Shire of Dandaragan John Grey LGA Representative, Shire of Carnamah Jenny Borger Community Representative, Shire of Three Springs Charles Strahan LGA Representative, Shire of Three Springs Bruce Eldridge/John Stevens WestNet Rail Extended Working David Coates DEC, Science Division Group Extended Working Gillian Stack DEC, Species and Communities Branch Group Extended Working Kathy Himbeck DEC, Moora District Group Extended Working Emma Richardson DEC, Moora District Group Extended Working Amanda Shade Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority Group Extended Working Fiona
    [Show full text]
  • Networks in a Large-Scale Phylogenetic Analysis: Reconstructing Evolutionary History of Asparagales (Lilianae) Based on Four Plastid Genes
    Networks in a Large-Scale Phylogenetic Analysis: Reconstructing Evolutionary History of Asparagales (Lilianae) Based on Four Plastid Genes Shichao Chen1., Dong-Kap Kim2., Mark W. Chase3, Joo-Hwan Kim4* 1 College of Life Science and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China, 2 Division of Forest Resource Conservation, Korea National Arboretum, Pocheon, Gyeonggi- do, Korea, 3 Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, United Kingdom, 4 Department of Life Science, Gachon University, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, Korea Abstract Phylogenetic analysis aims to produce a bifurcating tree, which disregards conflicting signals and displays only those that are present in a large proportion of the data. However, any character (or tree) conflict in a dataset allows the exploration of support for various evolutionary hypotheses. Although data-display network approaches exist, biologists cannot easily and routinely use them to compute rooted phylogenetic networks on real datasets containing hundreds of taxa. Here, we constructed an original neighbour-net for a large dataset of Asparagales to highlight the aspects of the resulting network that will be important for interpreting phylogeny. The analyses were largely conducted with new data collected for the same loci as in previous studies, but from different species accessions and greater sampling in many cases than in published analyses. The network tree summarised the majority data pattern in the characters of plastid sequences before tree building, which largely confirmed the currently recognised phylogenetic relationships. Most conflicting signals are at the base of each group along the Asparagales backbone, which helps us to establish the expectancy and advance our understanding of some difficult taxa relationships and their phylogeny.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Flora of Australia
    L'IBRARY'OF THE GRAY HERBARIUM HARVARD UNIVERSITY. BOUGHT. THE FLORA OF AUSTRALIA, ITS ORIGIN, AFFINITIES, AND DISTRIBUTION; BEING AN TO THE FLORA OF TASMANIA. BY JOSEPH DALTON HOOKER, M.D., F.R.S., L.S., & G.S.; LATE BOTANIST TO THE ANTARCTIC EXPEDITION. LONDON : LOVELL REEVE, HENRIETTA STREET, COVENT GARDEN. r^/f'ORElGN&ENGLISH' <^ . 1859. i^\BOOKSELLERS^.- PR 2G 1.912 Gray Herbarium Harvard University ON THE FLORA OF AUSTRALIA ITS ORIGIN, AFFINITIES, AND DISTRIBUTION. I I / ON THE FLORA OF AUSTRALIA, ITS ORIGIN, AFFINITIES, AND DISTRIBUTION; BEIKG AN TO THE FLORA OF TASMANIA. BY JOSEPH DALTON HOOKER, M.D., F.R.S., L.S., & G.S.; LATE BOTANIST TO THE ANTARCTIC EXPEDITION. Reprinted from the JJotany of the Antarctic Expedition, Part III., Flora of Tasmania, Vol. I. LONDON : LOVELL REEVE, HENRIETTA STREET, COVENT GARDEN. 1859. PRINTED BY JOHN EDWARD TAYLOR, LITTLE QUEEN STREET, LINCOLN'S INN FIELDS. CONTENTS OF THE INTRODUCTORY ESSAY. § i. Preliminary Remarks. PAGE Sources of Information, published and unpublished, materials, collections, etc i Object of arranging them to discuss the Origin, Peculiarities, and Distribution of the Vegetation of Australia, and to regard them in relation to the views of Darwin and others, on the Creation of Species .... iii^ § 2. On the General Phenomena of Variation in the Vegetable Kingdom. All plants more or less variable ; rate, extent, and nature of variability ; differences of amount and degree in different natural groups of plants v Parallelism of features of variability in different groups of individuals (varieties, species, genera, etc.), and in wild and cultivated plants vii Variation a centrifugal force ; the tendency in the progeny of varieties being to depart further from their original types, not to revert to them viii Effects of cross-impregnation and hybridization ultimately favourable to permanence of specific character x Darwin's Theory of Natural Selection ; — its effects on variable organisms under varying conditions is to give a temporary stability to races, species, genera, etc xi § 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for the Translocation of Threatened Plants in Australia
    Guidelines for the Translocation of Threatened Plants in Australia Third Edition Editors: L.E. Commander, D.J. Coates, L. Broadhurst, C.A. Offord, R.O. Makinson and M. Matthes © Australian Network for Plant Conservation, 2018 Information in this publication may be reproduced provided that any extracts are acknowledged National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry: Guidelines for the translocation of threatened plants in Australia. 3rd ed. ISBN-13: 978-0-9752191-3-3 1. Plant conservation - Australia. 2. Plant communities - Australia. 3. Endangered plants - Australia. I. Commander, Lucy Elizabeth, 1981- . II. Australian Network for Plant Conservation. 333.95320994 First Published 1997 Reprinted 1998 Second Edition 2004 Third Edition 2018 Cover design: TSR Hub Cover photograph: Translocation site of Banksia brownii in south-west WA. (Photo: A Cochrane). Printed by IPG Marketing Solutions, 25 Strathwyn Street, Brendale, QLD 4500 This publication should be cited as: Commander, L.E., Coates, D., Broadhurst, L., Offord, C.A., Makinson, R.O. and Matthes, M. (2018) Guidelines for the translocation of threatened plants in Australia. Third Edition. Australian Network for Plant Conservation, Canberra. For more information about the Australian Network for Plant Conservation please contact: ANPC National Office GPO Box 1777, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia Phone: + 61 (0)2 6250 9509 Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.anpc.asn.au Table of Contents Foreword .............................................................................................................................................................................................v
    [Show full text]
  • Growing Blandfordia (Christmas Bells) Commercially Agnote DPI-148 2Nd Edition, October 2003 Bettina Gollnow1, Gordon Dick2 and Paul Dalley2
    Growing Blandfordia (Christmas bells) commercially Agnote DPI-148 2nd edition, October 2003 www.agric.nsw.gov.au Bettina Gollnow1, Gordon Dick2 and Paul Dalley2 INTRODUCTION the problems that have been experienced. A small- Christmas bells (Blandfordia) are a relatively new culti- scale trial plot is recommended. vated cut flower crop with excellent commercial po- Information on cultural practices is becoming avail- tential. The distinctive flowers have great consumer able and, although there is still much to be learned, appeal, due partly to their long vase life. Blandfordia joins progress in crop management and – especially – the select group of Australian native plants that sells harvesting, packing and marketing has made Blandfordia as a feature flower, similar to a spray of orchids or an growing an increasingly feasible commercial enterprise. A major obstacle in establishing Blandfordia com- anthurium bloom. On the export market, cultivated mercially remains the lack of uniform clones and flowers are more likely than bush-picked product to varieties to provide consistency of product with meet the necessary quality standards. predictable flower sizes, appearance and quality. A small group of growers is producing flowers for domestic and export markets. The information in this Blandfordia is a protected native plant and a licence is Agnote is based largely on their experiences. As with required to grow it for commercial purposes (see ‘Get- any new crop, intending growers should be aware of ting started’). The conditions pertaining to licences 1 Development Officer (Floriculture) NSW Agriculture, Menangle. 2 Commercial Blandfordia growers. Christmas bells are emerging as a crop with commercial potential. for commercial export have recently changed and are capsules develop from the flowers and contain small, described in more detail on page 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Planning Action Not Commenced List at the Time of EPBC Act Amendments, February 2007 (Revised June 2009, Corrected November 2009)
    ATTACHMENT C Recovery planning action not commenced list at the time of EPBC Act amendments, February 2007 (revised June 2009, corrected November 2009) FLORA No. Common Name Scientific name 1. Acacia ammophila 2. Acacia anomala Grass Wattle 3. Acacia aphylla Leafless Rock Wattle 4. Acacia araneosa Spidery Wattle, Balcanoona Wattle 5. Acacia aristulata Maslin ms. 6. Acacia awestoniana Stirling Range Wattle 7. Acacia brachypoda Western Wheatbelt Wattle 8. Acacia carneorum Needle Wattle, Dead Finish 9. Acacia chapmanii subsp. australis 10. Acacia chinchillensis 11. Acacia cochlocarpa subsp. velutinosa Velvety Spiral Pod Wattle 12. Acacia crombiei Pink Gidgee 13. Acacia curranii Curly-bark Wattle 14. Acacia denticulosa Sandpaper Wattle 15. Acacia depressa Echidna Wattle 16. Acacia deuteroneura 17. Acacia flocktoniae 18. Acacia forrestiana Forest's Wattle 19. Acacia guymeri 20. Acacia handonis Hando's Wattle, Percy Grant Wattle 21. Acacia lauta 22. Acacia macnuttiana McNutt's Wattle 23. Acacia menzelii Menzels Wattle 24. Acacia praetermissa 25. Acacia pubifolia 26. Acacia purpureapetala 27. Acacia pygmaea Dwarf Rock Wattle 28. Acacia ramiflora 29. Acacia recurvata R.Cowan & Maslin ms. Recurved Wattle 30. Acacia solenota = Acacia sp.McIvor River (J.R.Clarkson 5475) 31. Acacia sp. Graveside Gorge (V.J. Levitzke 806) NT Herbarium 32. Acacia unguicula 33. Acacia wardellii 34. Acriopsis javanica 35. Acronychia littoralis Scented Acronychia 36. Acrophyllum australe 37. Actephila foetida [12078] 38. Adenanthos pungens subsp. pungens FLORA No. Common Name Scientific name 39. Adenanthos velutinus Velvet Woollybush 40. Allocasuarina defungens 41. Allocasuarina fibrosa Woolly Sheoak 42. Allocasuarina glareicola 43. Allocasuarina simulans 44. Allocasuarina thalassoscopica 45. Allocasuarina tortiramula Twisted Sheoak 46. Alloxylon flammeum Red Silky Oak, Queensland Waratah; Tree Waratah 47.
    [Show full text]