DOCSLIB.ORG

Nomination for the 2022 Wolf Prize

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nomination for the 2022 Wolf Prize NOMINATION FOR THE 2022 WOLF PRIZE INSTRUCTIONS FOR NOMINATING CANDIDATES IN ARCHITECTURE The Wolf Prizes in the sciences and the arts are awarded annually since 1978 to outstanding scientists and artists for their achievements for the benefit of humanity and brotherly relations among people, regardless of nationality, race, color, religion, sex, or political views. To date, 354 scientists and artists from all over the world have been awarded the prestigious Wolf Prize. Prize fields in sciences include Agriculture, Chemistry, Mathematics, Medicine, and Physics. Prize fields in the Arts include Architecture, Music, Painting and Sculpture. Every year, the Wolf Foundation awards four prizes in the Sciences and one prize in the Arts. Each prize consists of a diploma and 100,000$. In the event of co-recipients sharing one prize, the honorarium is equally divided among them. Previous Wolf Prize laureates in architecture include Arc. Moshe Safdie, Arc. David Chipperfield, Arc. Phyllis Lambert, Arc. Eduardo Souto de Mouro, Arc. Peter Eisenman, Arc. Ralph Erskine, Arc. Fumihiko Maki, Arc. Jean Nouvel, Arc. Giancarlo De Carlo, Arc. Álvaro Siza, Arc. Frank O. Gehry, Arc. Aldo Van Eyck, Arc. Frei Otto, Arc. Denys Lasdun, and Arc. Jorn Utzon. Process of Nomination GENERAL 1. In accordance with the Wolf Prize principle of rotation, candidate(s) for the 2022 prize can be nominated only in one of the following five fields: Agriculture, Chemistry, Mathematics, Physics, and Architecture. 2. One, two or three candidates may be nominated to receive the prize. Joint nomination recognizes collaborative work or work contributing similarly or additively to the same field. In this case, each candidate should be nominated using a separate form, with the jointly filed candidate mentioned in the appropriate place. If a joint nomination is for collaborative work, please state this at the beginning of the "Brief Description" section. Please specify the contribution of each candidate to their joint achievement. 3. A Nominator may submit more than one nomination package. 4. An international Prize Committee makes the selection of the Wolf prize Laureates. Committee decisions are final and irrevocable. NOMINATION PACKAGE: 5. The submission package should include: a. A duly completed Nomination Form. Please fill out all fields according to the instructions without exceeding the allotted space. b. Three or four letters of support from experts who are not affiliated with the candidate's organization. The signed letters must be written on formal letterhead. c. Candidate’s architecture portfolio. d. A recent candidate's photograph at high resolution of at least 300 dpi. e. A short biography, up to one page. 6. Submitting the nomination package: a. Submission via E-Mail only to: [email protected]. b. Submission deadline: October 20th, 2021 at 23:00 (Israel). c. In case of a large size of submission package, we suggest using Dropbox/ Wetransfer/Google drive for easy delivery. d. The Form must be completed in full and typewritten in English,11 font size. e. Edited Official Form will not be accepted. Do not make changes using editing software in the original form. f. Please send us all nomination materials in a single E-mail message. g. All files should be named according to their contents, including the candidate name. For example: Gross photo, Gross form etc. h. DO NOT PRINT AND SCAN the Nomination Form. i. DO NOT LOCK DOCUMENTS with passwords. j. Each nomination is automatically valid for two cycles. The nominator can update the nomination at any time during this period. After two cycles a new nomination package is required. 7. Limitations: a. The Prize is awarded to individuals. b. A person cannot nominate himself/herself. c. The Wolf Prize is awarded in Jerusalem by the President of the State of Israel. Nominators should reconsider proposing candidates who, to the best of their knowledge, may not be able to attend the ceremony. We are here to assist with any question. E-mail us to: [email protected] NOMINATION FORM WOLF PRIZE 2022 IN ARCHITECTURE 1 CANDIDATE PERSONAL DATA First name Surname Affiliation E-mail Telephone number Mobile number Date of birth Place of birth Office address Website ○ Please specify in case of a joint nomination. FULL NAME of joint candidate: Nominator (in case different nominator for each): 2 PROPOSED CITATION FOR DIPLOMA (Up to 50 words) 3 REASONS FOR NOMINATION AND BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ACHIEVEMENTS 4 MAJOR HONORS AND AWARDS (Only most prominent ones) 5 List of Supporters (Full name, affiliation, email) 6 NOMINATOR Full Name Title Affiliation Address Email Phone number Mobile number Date Scanned personal signature Submissions via E-Mail only to: [email protected] Nomination Deadline: October 20th , 2021 at 23:00 (Israel). NOMINATION FOR THE 2022 WOLF PRIZE INSTRUCTIONS FOR NOMINATING CANDIDATES The Wolf Prizes in the sciences and the arts are awarded annually since 1978 to outstanding scientists and artists for their achievements for the benefit of humanity and brotherly relations among people, regardless of nationality, race, color, religion, sex, or political views. To date, 354 scientists and artists from all over the world have been awarded the prestigious Wolf Prize. Prize fields in sciences include Agriculture, Chemistry, Mathematics, Medicine, and Physics. Prize fields in the Arts include Architecture, Music, Painting and Sculpture. Every year, the Wolf Foundation awards four prizes in the Sciences and one prize in the Arts. Each prize consists of a diploma and 100,000$. In the event of co-recipients sharing one prize, the honorarium is equally divided among them. Process of Nomination GENERAL 1. In accordance with the Wolf Prize principle of rotation, candidate(s) for the 2022 prize can be nominated only in one of the following five fields: Chemistry, Mathematics, Physics, Agriculture, and Architecture. 2. One, two or three candidates may be nominated to receive the prize. Joint nomination recognizes collaborative work or work contributing similarly or additively to the same field. In this case, each candidate should be nominated using a separate form, with the jointly filed candidate mentioned in the appropriate place. If a joint nomination is for collaborative work, please state this at the beginning of the "Brief Description" section. Please specify the contribution of each candidate to their joint achievement. 3. A Nominator may submit more than one nomination package. 4. An international Prize Committee makes the selection of the Wolf prize Laureates. Committee decisions are final and irrevocable. NOMINATION PACKAGE: 5. The submission package should include: a. A duly completed Nomination Form. Please fill out all fields according to the instructions without exceeding the allotted space. b. Three or four letters of support from experts who are not affiliated with the candidate's institution. The signed letters must be written on formal letterhead. An additional letter from the candidate's institution may be added. c. A recent candidate's photograph at high resolution of at least 300 dpi. d. A short biography, up to one page. 6. Submitting the nomination package: a. Submission via E-Mail only to: [email protected] b. Submission Deadline: October 20th , 2021 at 23:00 (Israel). c. The Form must be completed in full and typewritten in English,11 font size. d. Edited Official Form will not be accepted. Do not make changes using editing software in the original form. e. Please send us all nomination materials in a single E-mail message. f. All files should be named according to their contents including the candidate name. For example: Gross photo, Gross form etc. g. DO NOT PRINT AND SCAN the Nomination Form. h. DO NOT LOCK DOCUMENTS with passwords. i. Each nomination is automatically valid for three cycles. The nominator can update the nomination at any time during this period. After three cycles a new nomination package is required. 7. Limitations: a. The Prize is awarded to individuals, not to institutions. b. A person cannot nominate himself/herself. c. Nobel Prize Laureates will not be considered, unless their nomination is proposed for an achievement entirely different from the one recognized by the Nobel Prize. d. The Wolf Prize is awarded in Jerusalem by the President of the State of Israel. Nominators should reconsider proposing candidates who, to the best of their knowledge, may not be able to attend the ceremony. e. Kindly note that the Wolf Prize is awarded for significant breakthroughs and not for an exemplary career or leadership in a particular field. f. The Wolf Prize is awarded to scientists and artists from all over the world for their professional achievements for the benefit of humanity. Affiliation with the state of Israel or Israeli scientists is not a consideration for awarding the prize. We are here to assist with any question. E-mail us to: [email protected] NOMINATION FORM WOLF PRIZE 2022 IN THE SCIENCES 1 FIELD (Please mark one) ○ AGRICULTURE ○ PHYSICS ○ CHEMISTRY ○ MATHEMATICS 2 CANDIDATE PERSONAL DATA First name Surname Affiliation E-mail Telephone number Mobile number Date of birth Place of birth Office address ○ Please specify in case of a joint nomination. FULL NAME of joint candidate: Nominator (in case different nominator for each): 3 PROPOSED CITATION FOR DIPLOMA (Up to 50 words) 4 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF SCIENTIFIC ACHIEVEMENTS (Clearly and concisely describe only achievements that merit the prize) 5 EDUCATION AND MAIN POSITIONS HELD 6 MAJOR HONORS AND AWARDS (Only most prominent ones) 7 LIST OF MOST SIGNIFICANT PUBLICATIONS 8 LIST OF SUPPORTERS (Full name, affiliation, email) 9 NOMINATOR Full Name Title Affiliation Address Email Phone number Mobile number Date Scanned personal signature Institute’s logo or scanned stamp Submissions via E-Mail only to: [email protected] Nomination Deadline: October 20th , 2021 at 23:00 (Israel). .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HERITAGE UNDER SIEGE in BRAZIL the Bolsonaro Government Announced the Auction Sale of the Palácio Capanema in Rio, a Modern
    HERITAGE UNDER SIEGE IN BRAZIL the Bolsonaro Government announced the auction sale of the Palácio Capanema in Rio, a modern architecture icon that was formerly the Ministry of Education building FIRST NAME AND FAMILY NAME / COUNTRY TITLE, ORGANIZATION / CITY HUBERT-JAN HENKET, NL Honorary President of DOCOMOMO international ANA TOSTÕES, PORTUGAL Chair, DOCOMOMO International RENATO DA GAMA-ROSA COSTA, BRASIL Chair, DOCOMOMO Brasil LOUISE NOELLE GRAS, MEXICO Chair, DOCOMOMO Mexico HORACIO TORRENT, CHILE Chair, DOCOMOMO Chile THEODORE PRUDON, USA Chair, DOCOMOMO US LIZ WAYTKUS, USA Executive Director, DOCOMOMO US, New York IVONNE MARIA MARCIAL VEGA, PUERTO RICO Chair, DOCOMOMO Puerto Rico JÖRG HASPEL, GERMANY Chair, DOCOMOMO Germany PETR VORLIK / CZECH REPUBLIC Chair, DOCOMOMO Czech Republic PHILIP BOYLE / UK Chair, DOCOMOMO UK OLA ODUKU/ GHANA Chair, DOCOMOMO Ghana SUSANA LANDROVE, SPAIN Director, Fundación DOCOMOMO Ibérico, Barcelona IVONNE MARIA MARCIAL VEGA, PUERTO RICO Chair, DOCOMOMO Puerto Rico CAROLINA QUIROGA, ARGENTINA Chair, DOCOMOMO Argentina RUI LEAO / MACAU Chair, DOCOMOMO Macau UTA POTTGIESSER / GERMANY Vice-Chair, DOCOMOMO Germany / Berlin - Chair elect, DOCOMOMO International / Delft ANTOINE PICON, FRANCE Chairman, Fondation Le Corbusier PHYLLIS LAMBERT. CANADA Founding Director Imerita. Canadian Centre for Architecture. Montreal MARIA ELISA COSTA, BRASIL Presidente, CASA DE LUCIO COSTA/ Ex Presidente, IPHAN/ Rio de Janeiro JULIETA SOBRAL Diretora Executiva, CASA DE LUCIO COSTA, Rio de Janeiro ANA LUCIA NIEMEYER/ BRAZIL
    [Show full text]
  • National Arts Awards Monday, October 19, 2015
    2015 Americans for the Arts National Arts Awards Monday, October 19, 2015 Welcome from Robert L. Lynch Performance by YoungArts Alumni President and CEO of Americans for the Arts Musical Director, Jake Goldbas Philanthropy in the Arts Award Legacy Award Joan and Irwin Jacobs Maria Arena Bell Presented by Christopher Ashley Presented by Jeff Koons Outstanding Contributions to the Arts Award Young Artist Award Herbie Hancock Lady Gaga 1 Presented by Paul Simon Presented by Klaus Biesenbach Arts Education Award Carolyn Clark Powers Alice Walton Lifetime Achievement Award Presented by Agnes Gund Sophia Loren Presented by Rob Marshall Dinner Closing Remarks Remarks by Robert L. Lynch and Abel Lopez, Chair, introduction of Carolyn Clark Powers Americans for the Arts Board of Directors and Robert L. Lynch Remarks by Carolyn Clark Powers Chair, National Arts Awards Greetings from the Board Chair and President Welcome to the 2015 National Arts Awards as Americans for the Arts celebrates its 55th year of advancing the arts and arts education throughout the nation. This year marks another milestone as it is also the 50th anniversary of President Johnson’s signing of the act that created America’s two federal cultural agencies: the National Endowment for the Arts and the National Endowment for the Humanities. Americans for the Arts was there behind the scenes at the beginning and continues as the chief advocate for federal, state, and local support for the arts including the annual NEA budget. Each year with your help we make the case for the funding that fuels creativity and innovation in communities across the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • JBSC 2020 Proceedings 1.Pdf
    Delft University of Technology Repositioning Architecture in the Digital Proceedings of the 7th annual conference of the Jaap Bakema Study Centre van den Heuvel, D.; Monteiro de Jesus, Soscha; Hwang, S.A. Publication date 2020 Document Version Final published version Citation (APA) van den Heuvel, D., Monteiro de Jesus, S., & Hwang, S. A. (Eds.) (2020). Repositioning Architecture in the Digital: Proceedings of the 7th annual conference of the Jaap Bakema Study Centre. TU Delft and Het Nieuwe Instituut. Important note To cite this publication, please use the final published version (if applicable). Please check the document version above. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons. Takedown policy Please contact us and provide details if you believe this document breaches copyrights. We will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. This work is downloaded from Delft University of Technology. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to a maximum of 10. Jaap Bakema Study Centre Seventh Annual Conference November 2020 Repositioning Architecture in the Digital Introduction 5 Dirk van den Heuvel (TU Delft, Jaap Bakema Study Centre) Data Landscapes 9 Georg Vrachliotis (TU Delft) In conversation with Armin Linke (Photographer and Filmmaker) Data Matter 27 Marina Otero Verzier, Ludo Groen and Marten Kuijpers (Het Nieuwe Instituut) Habitat, Ecology and System Theory 31 Dirk van den Heuvel (TU Delft, Jaap Bakema Study Centre) and Soscha Monteiro de Jesus (Het Nieuwe Instituut) Archive Selection 33 Appendix 63 Conference Schedule 64 Keynote Lecture: Montreal and the Artificial Intelligence’s Mandate 67 Alessandra Ponte (Université de Montréal) Keynote Lecture: Data Landscapes 69 Armin Linke (Photographer and Filmmaker) Biographies 71 R.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short Cultural History of Britain
    S. L. Yeliseyev T. O. Kupinska A Short Cultural History of Britain Ministry of Education and Science, Youth and Sports of Ukraine State Institution “Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University” S. L. Yeliseyev T. O. Kupinska A Short Cultural History of Britain A manual for students of foreign languages departments of higher education institutions Luhansk SI “Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University” 2012 УДК 908:81.2Англ (076) ББК 26:81.2Англ–9 Є51 Rewievers: Mihalskiy I. S. – Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor, the chair of Political Studies of SI “Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University” Krysalo O. V. - Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor of Translation Studies Department SI “Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University” Demidov D. V. – Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, senior lecturer of English Philology Department of SI “Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University” Yeliseyev S. L. Є51 A Short Cultural History of Britain : a manual for students of foreign languages departments of higher education institutions / S. L. Yeliseyev, T. O. Kupinska ; State Institution “Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University”. – Luhansk : Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University Press, 2012. – 103 p. A Short Cultural History of Britain is a manual intended for students of foreign languages department, specialities “Language and Literature (English)”, “Philology. English and Oriental language and literature” and “Translation Studies”. Its aim is to give a general idea of artistic styles in European art from the Gothic style through the Romantic movement, and the detailed information on the history of theatre, music, visual arts and architecture of Great Britain. The content of the book conforms to the requirements of the syllabus of “Country Studies: the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland” for senior students.
    [Show full text]
  • "Stimmung" at Seagram: Philip Johnson Counters Mies Van Der Rohe Author(S): Phyllis Lambert Source: Grey Room, No
    Grey Room, Inc. "Stimmung" at Seagram: Philip Johnson Counters Mies Van Der Rohe Author(s): Phyllis Lambert Source: Grey Room, No. 20 (Summer, 2005), pp. 38-59 Published by: The MIT Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20442686 . Accessed: 05/09/2014 12:49 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The MIT Press and Grey Room, Inc. are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Grey Room. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 134.84.192.103 on Fri, 5 Sep 2014 12:49:45 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions EMI I 12 | 1~~~~~~~~~~1 II *~~~~~~~~~~~~i 11. Disp&y lighs (top) in Seagramon Result: were deagoedfor executive one of the bet-iuminated meetingro, disappearinto buildingsever constructed. ciling whn not inus They tumnme endmeetingof room 13. Ls.boue oeAs form intoeffeci stage. a conthfnus11%-foot-wlde baudamund the perimeter of 12. I*vL lihtseourc thebuilding. 0m (above) (centerrow above) were used w designedby Ketlmhum through buidig. Here & Sharp for 0. E. Me theyepiU a' wash of light Inte Inc, showsmodua over ceference-roomwalls, ceilinggrid in metnide offme sodmake ! ot o ght on and corridr,plus a low conferencet ightng brightnmsytm for 140.
    [Show full text]
  • Aauk 393-David Chipperfield
    20 21 SORTIR DU SOLILOQUE DAVID ARCHITECTURAL CHIPPERFIELD ABANDONING THE ARCHITECTURAL SOLILOQUY PAR / BY JONATHAN GLANCEY HEC PARIS Bâtiment d’accueil, entrance hall, Jouy-en-Josas, France, 2012. 22 23 « IL Y A DE LA PLACE POUR LA RADICALITÉ. » “THERE IS ROOM FOR RADICAL IDEAS.” Commissaire de la Biennale d’architecture de Venise en 2012, David Chipperfield, reconnu pour ses prestigieux projets culturels, ne renonce pas pour autant aux constructions « du quotidien ». Le Londonien confie sa lutte pour une culture architecturale basée sur des valeurs communes : érudition, responsabilité et réflexion. Curator of the 2012 Venice Architecture Biennale, David Chipperfield, known for his prestigious cultural projects, has nevertheless not turned his back on “ordinary” constructions. The London architect recounts for AA his battle for an architectural culture based on shared values: erudition, responsibility and reflection. L’ARCHITECTURE D’AUJOURD’HUI. Commençons L’ARCHITECTURE D’AUJOURDHUI. Let’s start with par Venise. Vous avez été le commissaire de la Biennale Venice. You were the curator of the 2012 Architecture BIENNALE d’architecture 2012. Quelle était l’idée phare de cette Biennale. What was the point of the show? What message DE VENISE édition et le message que vous vouliez faire passer ? were you trying to get across? VENICE BIENNALE 2012. DAVID CHIPPERFIELD. J’ai intitulé cette édition « Common DAVID CHIPPERFIELD. The title I chose for the show was Ground » [« socle commun », NDLR]. Il y a quelque temps de “Common Ground”. A while before, I’d been sitting in a late cela, j’étais en compagnie de Jacques Herzog dans un bar de night bar in Madrid with Jacques Herzog.
    [Show full text]
  • Paulacoopergallery
    P A U L A C O O P E R G A L L E R Y FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CLAES OLDENBURG & COOSJE VAN BRUGGEN THINGS AROUND THE HOUSE 534 W 21st Street November 7 – December 19, 2015 Opening reception: November 12, 6 – 8 pm NEW YORK—Things Around the House, an exhibition of works by Claes Oldenburg and Coosje van Bruggen, will be on view at Paula Cooper Gallery from November 7 through December 12. The exhibition includes nearly 100 works from the house and studio where Oldenburg has lived since 1971 and which he shared with his wife and partner Coosje van Bruggen from 1976 until her passing in 2009. By offering an intimate look at works that stayed on with the artists, the exhibition presents a unique view into a creative practice whose end Oldenburg has described as “developing a language of both exterior and interior life, in one expression.” Embracing what he calls “the poetry of everywhere,” Claes Oldenburg reimagines commonplace objects in distorted scale, materiality and hue. His exaggerated forms breathe vitality and tactile lyricism into ubiquitous or overlooked articles. The works on view in Things Around the House render fantastic or unfamiliar subjects that are usually prosaic and mundane. The exhibition also illuminates the artist’s cumulative approach to art making. His engagement with objects through sketches, writings, models and drawings is a constant process over decade- long periods of coexistence. The artist asserts: “Process is what keeps a thing alive, one thing leads to another. One has to do more to it – intensify color, play with material and scale, subject the form to gravity, make it collide with another object, turn it upside down or bury it halfway into the ground - so that it opens up multiple associations.” Claes Oldenburg was born in Stockholm, Sweden, in 1929.
    [Show full text]
  • Philharmonic Au Dito R 1 U M
    LUBOSHUTZ and NEMENOFF April 4, 1948 DRAPER and ADLER April 10, 1948 ARTUR RUBINSTEIN April 27, 1948 MENUHIN April 29, 1948 NELSON EDDY May 1, 1948 PHILHARMONIC AU DITO R 1 U M VOL. XLIV TENTH ISSUE Nos. 68 to 72 RUDOLF f No S® Beethoven: S°"^„passionala") Minor, Op. S’ ’e( MM.71l -SSsr0*“” « >"c Beethoven. h6tique") B1DÛ SAYÂO o»a>a°;'h"!™ »no. Celeb'“’ed °P” CoW»b» _ ------------------------- RUOOtf bKch . St«» --------------THE pWUde'Pw»®rc’^®®?ra Iren* W°s’ „„a olh.r,„. sr.oi «■ o'--d s,°3"' RUDOLF SERKIN >. among the scores of great artists who choose to record exclusively for COLUMBIA RECORDS Page One 1948 MEET THE ARTISTS 1949 /leJ'Uj.m&n, DeLuxe Selective Course Your Choice of 12 out of 18 $10 - $17 - $22 - $27 plus Tax (Subject to Change) HOROWITZ DEC. 7 HEIFETZ JAN. 11 SPECIAL EVENT SPECIAL EVENT 1. ORICINAL DON COSSACK CHORUS & DANCERS, Jaroff, Director Tues. Nov. 1 6 2. ICOR CORIN, A Baritone with a thrilling voice and dynamic personality . Tues. Nov. 23 3. To be Announced Later 4. PATRICE MUNSEL......................................................................................................... Tues. Jan. IS Will again enchant us-by her beautiful voice and great personal charm. 5. MIKLOS GAFNI, Sensational Hungarian Tenor...................................................... Tues. Jan. 25 6. To be Announced Later 7. ROBERT CASADESUS, Master Pianist . Always a “Must”...............................Tues. Feb. 8 8. BLANCHE THEBOM, Voice . Beauty . Personality....................................Tues. Feb. 15 9. MARIAN ANDERSON, America’s Greatest Contralto................................. Sun. Mat. Feb. 27 10. RUDOLF FIRKUSNY..................................................................................................Tues. March 1 Whose most sensational success on Feb. 29 last, seated him firmly, according to verdict of audience and critics alike, among the few Master Pianists now living.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Gold Medall
    1912 - Basil Champneys 1977 - Sir Denys Lasdun Royal Gold Medall 1913 - Sir Reginald Blomfield 1978 - Jørn Utzon 1914 - Jean Louis Pascal 1979 - Charles and Ray Eames 1848 - Charles Robert Cockerell 1915 - Frank Darling, Canada 1980 - James Stirling 1849 - Luigi Canina 1916 - Sir Robert Rowand Anderson 1981 - Sir Philip Dowson 1850 - Sir Charles Barry 1917 - Henri Paul Nenot 1982 - Berthold Lubetkin 1851 - Thomas Leverton Donaldson 1918 - Ernest Newton 1983 - Sir Norman Foster 1852 - Leo von Klenze 1919 - Leonard Stokes 1984 - Charles Correa 1853 - Sir Robert Smirke 1920 - Charles Louis Girault 1985 - Sir Richard Rogers 1854 - Philip Hardwick 1921 - Sir Edwin Landseer Lutyens 1986 - Arata Isozaki 1855 - Jacques Ignace Hittorff 1922 - Thomas Hastings 1987 - Ralph Erskine 1856 - Sir William Tite 1923 - Sir John James Burnet 1988 - Richard Meier 1857 - Owen Jones 1924 - No award 1989 - Renzo Piano 1858 - Friedrich August Stüler 1925 - Sir Giles Gilbert Scott 1990 - Aldo van Eyck 1859 - Sir George Gilbert Scott 1926 - Prof. Ragnar Ostberg 1991 - Colin Stansfield Smith 1860 - Sydney Smirke 1927 - Sir Herbert Baker 1992 - Peter Rice 1861 - JB Lesueur 1928 - Sir Guy Dawber 1993 - Giancarlo de Carlo 1862 - Rev Robert Willis 1929 - Victor Alexandre Frederic 1994 - Michael and Patricia Hopkins 1863 - Anthony Salvin Laloux 1995 - Colin Rowe 1864 - Eugene Viollet-le-Duc 1930 - Percy Scott Worthington 1996 - Harry Seidler 1865 - Sir James Pennethorne 1931 - Sir Edwin Cooper 1997 - Tadao Ando 1866 - Sir Matthew Digby Wyatt 1932 - Dr. Hendrik Petrus Berlage 1998 - Oscar Niemeyer 1867 - Charles Texier 1933 - Sir Charles Reed Peers 1999 - Barcelona 1868 - Sir Austen Henry Layard 1934 - Henry Vaughan Lanchester 2000 - Frank Gehry 1869 - Karl Richard Lepsius 1935 - Willem Marinus Dudok 2001 - Jean Nouvel 1870 - Benjamin Ferrey 1936 - Charles Henry Holden 2002 - Archigram 1871 - James Fergusson 1937 - Sir Raymond Unwin 2003 - Rafael Moneo 1872 - Baron von Schmidt 1938 - Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • The World Monuments
    EARTHQUAKE FUND FOR ASSISI The World Monuments Fund® (WMF) is a private The Friends of Assisi, an emergency appeal to assist Italy's recovery from the recent earthquakes that have struck nonprofit organization founded in 1965 by individu~ the center of the country, has been founded in association als concerned about the accelerating destruction with WMF. Since September 26, 1997 a series of powerful Whither Cambodiai' tremors and strong aftershocks have damaged parts of of important artistic treasures throughout the Umbria and the Marches. At the Basilica Superiore ofthe world. Church of San Francesco in Assisi, the tremors caused a nJuly 4,John Stubbs and I The ensuing weeks were full of <, section ofthe irreplaceable frescoed vault to collapse, were on a plane out of worry for our team in the field at To date WMF has orchestrated more than 165 killing two monks and two Italian government engineers O Dubrovnik, after a week ofgrappling Angkor. Communications were cut major projects in 52 countries. Today, with who were inspecting damage from the earlier quake. Throughout this part of Italy, where many characteristic first-hand with the staggering off, and we pored over newspapers affiliates established ,in EUfope--in Britain, France, late-medieval and early Renaissance townscapes were so challenge ofrebuilding the countries and Internet reports wondering thoroughly preserved, dozens oftowns have sustained Italy, Portugal, and Spain-the World Monuments that were once Yugoslavia. Reading how our more than 60 Cambodian major damage and hundreds of buildings and works of art the newspaper we learned that Prince workers were faring, and how to Fund sponsors an ongoing program for the are now on the brink of being lost.
    [Show full text]
  • Mauro Marzo Lotus. the First Thirty Years of an Architectural Magazine
    DOI: 10.1283/fam/issn2039-0491/n43-2018/142 Mauro Marzo Lotus. The first thirty years of an architectural magazine Abstract Imagined more as an annual dedicated to the best works of architectu- re, urban and industrial design, during the first seven issues, the maga- zine «Lotus» shifts the axis of its purpose from that of information and professional updating to one of a critical examination of the key issues intrinsic to the architectural project. This article identifies some themes, which pervaded the first thirty years of «Lotus» life, from 1964 to 1994, re- emerging, with variations, in many successive issues. If the monographic approach set a characteristic of the editorial line that endures over time, helping to strengthen the magazine’s identity, the change in the themes dealt with over the course of the decades is considered as a litmus test of the continuous evolution of the theoretical-design issues at the core of the architectural debate. Keywords Lotus International — Architectural annual — Little Magazine — Pier- luigi Nicolin — Bruno Alfieri The year 1963 was a memorable one for the British racing driver Jim Clark. At the helm of his Lotus 25 custom-made for him by Colin Chapman, he had won seven of the ten races scheduled for that year. The fastest lap at the Italian Grand Prix held at Monza on 8 September 1963 had allowed him and his team to win the drivers’ title and the Constructors’ Cup,1 with three races to go before the end of the championship. That same day, Chap- man did “the lap of honour astride the hood of his Lotus 25”.2 This car, and its success story, inspired the name chosen for what was initially imagined more as an annual dedicated to the best works of archi- tecture, urban and industrial design, rather than a traditional magazine.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of the Role of the Actor-Musician in Britain by British Directors Since the 1960’S
    1 The Development of the Role of the Actor-Musician in Britain by British Directors Since the 1960’s Francesca Mary Greatorex Theatre and Performance Department Goldsmiths University of London A thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) 2 I hereby declare that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Signed: ……………………………………………. 3 Acknowledgements This thesis could not have been written without the generosity of many individuals who were kind enough to share their knowledge and theatre experience with me. I have spoken with actors, musical directors, set designers, directors, singers, choreographers and actor-musicians and their names and testaments exist within the thesis. I should like to thank Emily Parsons the archivist for the Liverpool Everyman for all her help with my endless requests. I also want to thank Jonathan Petherbridge at the London Bubble for making the archive available to me. A further thank you to Rosamond Castle for all her help. On a sadder note a posthumous thank you to the director Robert Hamlin. He responded to my email request for the information with warmth, humour and above all, great enthusiasm for the project. Also a posthumous thank you to the actor, Robert Demeger who was so very generous with the information regarding the production of Ninagawa’s Hamlet in which he played Polonius. Finally, a big thank you to John Ginman for all his help, patience and advice. 4 The Development of the Role of the Actor-Musician in Britain by British Directors During the Period 1960 to 2000.
    [Show full text]