DOCSLIB.ORG

OTU Table V3 Copy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Sample 8 BF1+BR1 BF1+BR2 BF2+BR1 BF2+BR2 Sample 10 BF1+BR1 BF1+BR2 BF2+BR1 BF2+BR2 OTU Order Family Genus Species S M L S M L Un So S M L Un So S M L Un So S M L Un So S M L S M L Un So S M L Un So S M L Un So S M L Un So OTU_120 Trombidiformes Lebertiidae .020 .010 .004 .008 .007 .005 0.09 .020 .007 0.07 .022 .006 OTU_123 Trombidiformes Anystidae .012 .002 .023 .019 .003 .024 .024 .002 .032 .026 .021 OTU_178 Trichoptera Sericostomatidae Oecismus monedula .002 .030 .002 0.06 .001 .002 .038 .003 .041 OTU_111 Trichoptera Hydropsychidae .017 .003 0.06 .019 .001 .034 .014 .005 .027 .024 .001 .021 OTU_19 Trichoptera Philopotamidae Wormaldia occipitalis 0 0 0 5 5 0 2.8 1.6 1.5 3.1 3.1 0.83 0.39 1.8 0.82 0.57 0.51 0.88 0.77 0.35 0.17 0.56 OTU_14 Trichoptera Sericostomatidae Sericostoma personatum 2.1 0.19 2.6 2.9 0.15 3.0 5.4 0.52 5.1 8.4 0.61 7.0 2.1 3.1 5.8 1.7 4.4 3.4 1.5 6.3 5.2 5.7 11 3.4 9.9 6.8 4.1 11 OTU_2580 Trichoptera Sericostomatidae Sericostoma personatum .003 .001 .003 .006 .003 .005 .010 .003 .010 .006 .011 20 2 0 19 3 0 OTU_21 Trichoptera Sericostomatidae Sericostoma baeticum 3.2 2.0 0.67 4.2 2.2 0.39 0.35 3.7 4.9 5.0 1.1 4.9 3.9 1.8 0.84 4.9 OTU_153 Trichoptera Sericostomatidae Sericostoma .030 .004 .020 .016 .012 .034 .005 .004 .025 .030 .004 .020 OTU_1773 Trichoptera Limnephilidae Potamophylax cingulatus 0.43 .029 .005 0.08 .012 .002 2.4 0.17 .018 1.1 0.09 .009 OTU_1432 Trichoptera Limnephilidae Potamophylax cingulatus 0 0 0 0 0 2 1.0 0.07 .011 0.18 .027 .006 4.9 0.34 .043 1.9 0.17 .017 OTU_16 Trichoptera Limnephilidae Potamophylax cingulatus 13 0.89 0.13 2.5 0.35 0.07 33 2.4 0.33 16 1.4 0.15 Trichoptera Polycentropodidae Polycentropus kingi 2 5 0 0 0 0 OTU_48 Trichoptera Polycentropodidae Polycentropus irroratus 1 2 0 0.26 0.32 0.12 0.34 0.08 .047 .049 0.16 0.19 0.53 0.19 0.16 0.09 0.19 0.14 0.10 0 0 0 OTU_412 Trichoptera Polycentropodidae Polycentropus flavomaculatus 0.13 .017 0.12 0.06 .011 0.07 .024 .006 .020 .021 .003 .018 0 1 0 0 0 0 OTU_38 Trichoptera Polycentropodidae Polycentropus flavomaculatus 0.17 2.1 1.1 0.28 0.19 0.93 0.77 0.35 .032 1.0 0.34 0.08 0.05 1.0 0.44 0.10 Trichoptera Philopotamidae 0 0 0 7 0 0 OTU_4 Trichoptera Odontoceridae Odontocerum albicorne 0 1 1 3.5 4.9 5.8 0.45 1.6 3.9 5.0 0.45 5.3 11 4.4 0.35 4.7 14 5.8 0.40 2 12 0 0.43 20 12 3.3 0.69 22 13 4.8 0.60 18 .001 12 3.3 0.74 21 15 4.0 OTU_6 Trichoptera Limnephilidae Halesus radiatus .005 70 32 1.1 20 14 0.66 72 34 0.90 35 25 0.58 OTU_3353 Trichoptera Limnephilidae Halesus radiatus 0 0 8 0.34 0.14 .007 0.09 0.05 .004 0.46 0.21 .005 0.20 0.13 .004 0 0 0 OTU_157 Trichoptera Limnephilidae Halesus radiatus .001 2.7 1.2 0.07 0.75 0.50 .035 5.2 2.2 0.07 2.6 1.6 .044 OTU_20 Trichoptera Limnephilidae Drusus annulatus 0 0 0 0 1 0 4.7 3.2 0.12 1.3 0.77 0.19 5.5 2.9 0.17 1.8 0.81 0.19 OTU_32 Trichoptera Polycentropodidae Cyrnus trimaculatus 0 2 0 2.4 0.43 0.15 0.22 0.13 0.10 3.0 0.49 0.08 0.53 0.23 .048 0 0 0 OTU_4149 Trichoptera Limnephilidae Chaetopteryx villosa .002 .002 0.06 .007 .032 .007 .021 .004 .014 .004 .004 .032 .030 .028 .012 .002 .013 .006 .013 .005 OTU_2 Trichoptera Limnephilidae Chaetopteryx villosa 1 36 1 1.4 38 2.4 18 6.5 0.42 5.1 0.81 4.9 3.3 1.9 58 6.9 31 7.1 0.72 23 4.1 15 4.2 8 29 1 3.2 30 23 21 9.5 1.9 10 2.9 9.0 3.4 4.9 39 31 27 12 2.5 18 9.3 15 4.0 OTU_6059 Trichoptera Limnephilidae Chaetopteryx .018 .009 .002 .003 .002 .001 .028 .002 .019 .002 .012 .006 .002 .002 .001 .004 .002 .002 .002 .001 OTU_99 Trichoptera Limnephilidae Anomalopterygella chauviniana 0 1 0 .031 .023 .003 .006 .009 0.35 0.11 .039 0.14 0.09 .028 0 0 0 OTU_217 Symphypleona Dicyrtomidae Dicyrtomina minuta .001 .023 .012 .014 .004 OTU_205 Rhynchobdellida Glossiphoniidae Helobdella stagnalis 0 1 0 .013 .017 .005 0.06 .041 .010 0 0 0 OTU_93 Pulmonata Ancylidae Ancylus fluviatilis 1 2 0 .001 0.13 0.07 .029 .003 .039 0.09 .014 .002 0 0 0 OTU_212 Ploima .017 .007 .003 .002 OTU_291 Plecoptera .024 .013 .016 .001 .015 OTU_375 Plecoptera Perlodidae .011 .001 .004 .012 .001 .014 OTU_49 Plecoptera Perlodidae Diura nanseni 0.09 .006 .038 0.17 .009 0.13 1.6 .011 0.12 0.91 2.2 .010 0.21 2.0 OTU_1553 Plecoptera Perlodidae Diura .002 .002 .011 .004 OTU_1641 Plecoptera Leuctridae .003 .001 .004 .002 .001 0.06 .013 .040 .041 .011 .024 OTU_1249 Plecoptera Leuctridae .003 .003 .011 .003 OTU_43 Plecoptera Chloroperlidae Siphonoperla torrentium 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.54 .042 0.27 0.44 .018 0.39 0.99 0.09 0.42 0.65 .027 0.54 OTU_5 Plecoptera Nemouridae Protonemura auberti 0 0 0 54 6 0 16 14 .014 8.4 19 9.9 5.9 .002 4.9 13 24 8.7 .017 11 18 12 3.4 .007 7.3 11 Plecoptera 0 0 0 1 0 0 OTU_175 Plecoptera Nemouridae Nemoura avicularis 1 0 0 .018 .001 .011 .009 .001 .011 .002 .002 .006 .003 .004 0 0 0 OTU_13 Plecoptera Leuctridae Leuctra braueri 0 0 0 38 3 0 2.6 0.38 0.74 4.1 11 0.72 0.58 12 7.0 0.65 1.7 7.5 21 1.1 1.5 17 OTU_27 Plecoptera Leuctridae Leuctra fusca 0.56 0.10 0.72 0.46 .042 0.55 3.4 .002 0.46 3.2 3.2 0.34 3.3 OTU_88 Plecoptera Leuctridae Leuctra digitata 0.09 .009 0.09 0.07 .006 0.07 0.30 .036 0.20 0.27 .029 0.20 .007 .002 .015 .009 .012 .023 .001 .027 .030 .018 OTU_73 Plecoptera Leuctridae Leuctra aurita 61 0 0 8 0 0 .001 .002 .002 0.27 .036 0.34 0.75 .038 0.64 OTU_41 Plecoptera Leuctridae Leuctra albida 0.26 .032 0.05 0.32 0.22 .006 .050 0.14 1.4 0.21 0.25 1.00 1.2 0.14 0.27 0.62 OTU_67 Plecoptera Leuctridae Leuctra 0.09 .001 .023 0.24 0.17 .006 0.22 0.31 .002 0.06 0.49 0.46 .001 .020 0.37 Plecoptera Perlodidae Dictyogenus 0 0 0 19 0 0 OTU_220 Philodinida Philodinidae .003 .005 .001 .016 .006 .002 .018 Oligochaeta 9 0 0 22 3 0 OTU_114 Odonata Cordulegastridae Cordulegaster boltonii .011 .003 .030 .010 .001 .017 0.05 .005 .047 .028 .004 .029 1 0 0 0 0 0 OTU_152 Odonata Calopterygidae Calopteryx maculata .003 .013 .032 .006 .021 .003 .001 .001 .021 .043 .020 .024 Nematoda 1 0 1 0 0 0 OTU_130 Lumbriculida .030 .001 .028 .006 .017 .026 .013 .008 .009 OTU_1067 Lumbriculida .006 .003 .001 .003 .016 .007 .006 .003 OTU_162 Lumbriculida Lumbriculidae .010 .011 .006 .002 .006 .029 .002 .021 .014 .002 .016 OTU_75 Lumbriculida Lumbriculidae Stylodrilus heringianus 0.21 .008 0.17 .025 .001 .031 0.21 .020 0.09 .037 .004 .027 OTU_4070 Lumbriculida Lumbriculidae Stylodrilus heringianus 0.08 .006 0.08 .025 .001 .032 0.08 .007 0.05 .038 .005 .027 0.44 0.11 0.55 0.30 .028 0.25 0.38 .039 0.29 0.24 .009 0.15 OTU_54 Lumbriculida Lumbriculidae Stylodrilus heringianus 0.44 0.12 0.56 0.32 .027 0.28 0.33 .034 0.23 0.23 .008 0.11 OTU_28 Lumbriculida Lumbriculidae Stylodrilus heringianus 0.15 .010 0.21 .050 .003 0.06 0.17 .014 0.13 0.08 .008 0.06 2.6 0.70 2.8 1.4 0.12 1.3 2.3 0.25 1.4 1.3 0.06 0.71 OTU_17 Lumbriculida Lumbriculidae Lumbriculus variegatus 6.9 0.26 4.3 1.7 0.07 1.9 2.5 0.27 1.4 0.82 0.14 0.78 .009 .016 .007 .009 .010 .005 .008 .006 OTU_69 Lumbriculida Lumbriculidae Lumbriculus 0.10 .004 0.14 0.11 .004 0.19 0.18 .012 0.15 0.20 .017 0.21 Insecta 1 0 0 2 0 0 OTU_272 Hymenoptera .002 .026 .017 OTU_160 Hymenoptera Formicidae Myrmica ruginodis .022 .004 .019 .035 .003 .017 OTU_159 Hymenoptera Formicidae Formicidae .008 .037 .035 .013 .039 OTU_23 Hygrophila Lymnaeidae Radix labiata 0 1 3 0.60 9.4 3.9 0.23 0.16 8.0 3.8 0.37 0.05 0.08 .001 0 0 0 OTU_35 Hemiptera Veliidae Velia caprai 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.51 0.07 0.67 1.6 0.06 1.7 0.34 .019 0.28 1.00 .033 0.62 OTU_4226 Hemiptera Micronectidae Micronecta poweri 8 0 0 0.08 .007 0.05 .023 .002 .015 0 0 0 OTU_83 Hemiptera Corixidae Micronecta 0 0 0 .025 .003 .016 .007 .002 .004 0.49 0.07 0.44 0.15 .040 0.19 1 0 0 OTU_183 Harpacticoida .005 .003 .001 .002 .013 .003 .004 .002 .005 .001 .002 .009 .008 .021 .001 .002 .002 .003 OTU_167 Haplotaxida .020 .010 .002 .003 .015 .018 .004 .002 OTU_84 Haplotaxida Tubificidae .030 0.10 0.12 .004 .004 .026 .018 .020 0.06 0.09 .002 .005 .023 0.06 OTU_72 Haplotaxida Tubificidae Nais communis variabilis .003 0.18 0.14 0.11 .034 .033 0.06 .015 .015 0.10 0.06 0.13 .005 .039 .038 .037 .003 OTU_112 Haplotaxida Tubificidae Nais alpina .003 .027 .046 .034 .008 .002 .002 .019 .009 .005 .001 .010 .010 .014 .007 .006 OTU_265 Haplotaxida Lumbricidae .003 .010 .006 .002 .002 OTU_15 Haplotaxida Lumbricidae Eiseniella tetraedra 3.7 1.3 0.28 7.1 7.8 0.63 1.2 0.38 0.08 2.1 2.3 0.13 OTU_97 Haplotaxida Enchytraeidae .032 .006 0.08 .017 .002 .028 0.07 .002 0.08 .025 .002 .024 OTU_233 Ephemeroptera Leptophlebiidae Leptophlebia marginata 63 0 0 .001 .023 .003 .010 .003 26 0 0 .001 OTU_7 Ephemeroptera Leptophlebiidae Habrophlebia lauta 29 0.13 0.86 22 6.6 .033 0.24 12 14 0.12 0.86 7.0 3.9 .049 0.36 3.9 4.5 0.49 0.77 9.7 5.4 0.34 0.49 5.6 3.6 0.52 0.71 6.4 3.3 0.36 0.46 3.1 OTU_194 Ephemeroptera Leptophlebiidae Habrophlebia lauta 10 0 0 .010 .007 .003 .006 .011 .003 .004 .005 .001 .004 4 0 0 .003 .004 .002 .007 .003 .006 .003 .004 OTU_1086 Ephemeroptera Leptophlebiidae Habrophlebia .006 .003 .002 .003 .004 .002 .001 .001 .002 .009 .002 .003 .008 .012 .005 .003 OTU_26 Ephemeroptera Leptophlebiidae Habroleptoides 0 0 0 14 0 0 0.41 .001 0.05 0.53 0.33 .018 0.33 9.8 .005 0.92 8.2 6.3 .002 0.37 4.1 OTU_2676 Ephemeroptera Ephemerellidae .003 .004 .002 .003 0.12 .002 0.12 0.15 0.14 OTU_2130 Ephemeroptera Ephemerellidae Serratella 0.26 .021 0.15 0.26 .011 0.14 0.96 0.09 0.66 0.95 0.09 0.69 OTU_630 Ephemeroptera Ephemerellidae Serratella .004 .003 .020 .018 OTU_8 Ephemeroptera Ephemerellidae Ephemerella ignita 212 2 0 25 0.31 .038 2.8 22 25 0.08 .025 1.5 15 45 1.6 0.46 9.4 49 47 0.87 0.78 8.0 42 0 0 0 OTU_30 Ephemeroptera Ephemerellidae Ephemerella ignita 0.84 .035 0.06 0.52 0.94 0.07 0.07 0.51 5.0 1.6 0.65 3.2 4.9 4.5 .001 1.7 3.6 OTU_3571 Ephemeroptera
Recommended publications
  • Unexpected Diversity in Neelipleona Revealed by Molecular Phylogeny Approach (Hexapoda, Collembola)

    Unexpected Diversity in Neelipleona Revealed by Molecular Phylogeny Approach (Hexapoda, Collembola)

    S O I L O R G A N I S M S Volume 83 (3) 2011 pp. 383–398 ISSN: 1864-6417 Unexpected diversity in Neelipleona revealed by molecular phylogeny approach (Hexapoda, Collembola) Clément Schneider1, 3, Corinne Cruaud2 and Cyrille A. D’Haese1 1 UMR7205 CNRS, Département Systématique et Évolution, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, CP50 Entomology, 45 rue Buffon, 75231 Paris cedex 05, France 2 Genoscope, Centre National de Sequençage, 2 rue G. Crémieux, CP5706, 91057 Evry cedex, France 3 Corresponding author: Clément Schneider (email: [email protected]) Abstract Neelipleona are the smallest of the four Collembola orders in term of species number with 35 species described worldwide (out of around 8000 known Collembola). Despite this apparent poor diversity, Neelipleona have a worldwide repartition. The fact that the most commonly observed species, Neelus murinus Folsom, 1896 and Megalothorax minimus Willem, 1900, display cosmopolitan repartition is striking. A cladistic analysis based on 16S rDNA, COX1 and 28S rDNA D1 and D2 regions, for a broad collembolan sampling was performed. This analysis included 24 representatives of the Neelipleona genera Neelus Folsom, 1896 and Megalothorax Willem, 1900 from various regions. The interpretation of the phylogenetic pattern and number of transformations (branch length) indicates that Neelipleona are more diverse than previously thought, with probably many species yet to be discovered. These results buttress the rank of Neelipleona as a whole order instead of a Symphypleona family. Keywords: Collembola, Neelidae, Megalothorax, Neelus, COX1, 16S, 28S 1. Introduction 1.1. Brief history of Neelipleona classification The Neelidae family was established by Folsom (1896), who described Neelus murinus from Cambridge (USA).
  • Checklist of Springtails (Collembola) from the Republic of Moldova

    Checklist of Springtails (Collembola) from the Republic of Moldova

    Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle © Décembre Vol. LIII pp. 149–160 «Grigore Antipa» 2010 DOI: 10.2478/v10191-010-0011-x CHECKLIST OF SPRINGTAILS (COLLEMBOLA) FROM THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA GALINA BUªMACHIU Abstract. The checklist of Collembola from the Republic of Moldova including 223 species is presented. The list is based on literature sources and personal collecting. Résumé. Ce travail présente la liste des 223 espèces de collemboles de la République de Moldova. Cette liste fut réalisée en utilisant des références littéraires et des collections personnelles. Key words: Collembola, checklist, Republic of Moldova. INTRODUCTION The records on Collembola from the Republic of Moldova started about 50 years ago with the first two species included by Martynova in “The key to insects of the European part of the USSR. Collembola” (1964). Some more information on species diversity of Collembola from the soil of Moldavian vineyards was included in Stegãrescu’s work (1967). During the last twenty years, this group has been studied more systematically, with more than 200 species recorded (Buºmachiu 2001, 2004, 2006 a, b, 2008). Since 2002, eleven species new to science were described from the Republic of Moldova by da Gama & Buºmachiu (2002, 2004); Buºmachiu & Deharveng (2008) and Buºmachiu & Weiner (2008). Until now, the faunistic data on Collembola from the Republic of Moldova have not been summarised in the form of a checklist. The present paper includes the complete list of Collembola from the Republic of Moldova using the modern nomenclature. Totally, 223 species are listed. Some problematic and dubious species, such as Pseudanurida clysmae Jackson, 1927, Onychiurus fimetarius (Linnaeus, 1758) and Orchesella divergens Handschin, 1929 recorded by Stegãrescu (1967) and Pseudosinella wahlgrei Börner, 1907, are not included in the list.
  • Biodiversidad De Collembola (Hexapoda: Entognatha) En México

    Biodiversidad De Collembola (Hexapoda: Entognatha) En México

    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, Supl. 85: S220-S231, 2014 220 Palacios-Vargas.- BiodiversidadDOI: 10.7550/rmb.32713 de Collembola Biodiversidad de Collembola (Hexapoda: Entognatha) en México Biodiversity of Collembola (Hexapoda: Entognatha) in Mexico José G. Palacios-Vargas Laboratorio de Ecología y Sistemática de Microartrópodos, Departamento de Ecología y Recursos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito exterior s/n, Cd. Universitaria, 04510 México, D. F. [email protected] Resumen. Se hace una breve evaluación de la importancia del grupo en los distintos ecosistemas. Se describen los caracteres morfológicos más distintivos, así como los biotopos donde se encuentran y su tipo de alimentación. Se hace una evaluación de la biodiversidad, encontrando que existen citados más de 700 taxa, muchos de ellos a nivel genérico, de 24 familias. Se discute su distribución geográfica por provincias biogeográficas, así como la diversidad de cada estado. Se presentan cuadros con la clasificación ecológica con ejemplos mexicanos; se indican las familias y su riqueza a nivel mundial y nacional, así como la curva acumulativa de especies mexicanas por quinquenio. Palabras clave: Collembola, biodiversidad, distribución, ecología, acumulación de especies. Abstract. A brief assessment of the importance of the group in different ecosystems is done. A description of the most distinctive morphological characters, as well as biotopes where they live is included. An evaluation of their biodiversity is presented; finding that more than 700 taxa have been cited, many of them at the generic level, in 24 families. Their geographical distribution is discussed and the state richness is pointed out. Tables of ecological classification applied to Mexican species are given.
  • Redalyc.Biodiversidad De Collembola (Hexapoda: Entognatha) En México

    Redalyc.Biodiversidad De Collembola (Hexapoda: Entognatha) En México

    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad ISSN: 1870-3453 [email protected] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México México Palacios-Vargas, José G. Biodiversidad de Collembola (Hexapoda: Entognatha) en México Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, vol. 85, 2014, pp. 220-231 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Distrito Federal, México Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=42529679040 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, Supl. 85: S220-S231, 2014 220 Palacios-Vargas.- BiodiversidadDOI: 10.7550/rmb.32713 de Collembola Biodiversidad de Collembola (Hexapoda: Entognatha) en México Biodiversity of Collembola (Hexapoda: Entognatha) in Mexico José G. Palacios-Vargas Laboratorio de Ecología y Sistemática de Microartrópodos, Departamento de Ecología y Recursos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito exterior s/n, Cd. Universitaria, 04510 México, D. F. [email protected] Resumen. Se hace una breve evaluación de la importancia del grupo en los distintos ecosistemas. Se describen los caracteres morfológicos más distintivos, así como los biotopos donde se encuentran y su tipo de alimentación. Se hace una evaluación de la biodiversidad, encontrando que existen citados más de 700 taxa, muchos de ellos a nivel genérico, de 24 familias. Se discute su distribución geográfica por provincias biogeográficas, así como la diversidad de cada estado. Se presentan cuadros con la clasificación ecológica con ejemplos mexicanos; se indican las familias y su riqueza a nivel mundial y nacional, así como la curva acumulativa de especies mexicanas por quinquenio.
  • (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) in Western North America By

    (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) in Western North America By

    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Robert W. Wisseman for the degree of Master ofScience in Entomology presented on August 6, 1987 Title: Biology and Distribution of the Dicosmoecinae (Trichoptera: Limnsphilidae) in Western North America Redacted for privacy Abstract approved: N. H. Anderson Literature and museum records have been reviewed to provide a summary on the distribution, habitat associations and biology of six western North American Dicosmoecinae genera and the single eastern North American genus, Ironoquia. Results of this survey are presented and discussed for Allocosmoecus,Amphicosmoecus and Ecclisomvia. Field studies were conducted in western Oregon on the life-histories of four species, Dicosmoecusatripes, D. failvipes, Onocosmoecus unicolor andEcclisocosmoecus scvlla. Although there are similarities between generain the general habitat requirements, the differences or variability is such that we cannot generalize to a "typical" dicosmoecine life-history strategy. A common thread for the subfamily is the association with cool, montane streams. However, within this stream category habitat associations range from semi-aquatic, through first-order specialists, to river inhabitants. In feeding habits most species are omnivorous, but they range from being primarilydetritivorous to algal grazers. The seasonal occurrence of the various life stages and voltinism patterns are also variable. Larvae show inter- and intraspecificsegregation in the utilization of food resources and microhabitatsin streams. Larval life-history patterns appear to be closely linked to seasonal regimes in stream discharge. A functional role for the various types of case architecture seen between and within species is examined. Manipulation of case architecture appears to enable efficient utilization of a changing seasonal pattern of microhabitats and food resources.
  • Collembola of Canada 187 Doi: 10.3897/Zookeys.819.23653 REVIEW ARTICLE Launched to Accelerate Biodiversity Research

    Collembola of Canada 187 Doi: 10.3897/Zookeys.819.23653 REVIEW ARTICLE Launched to Accelerate Biodiversity Research

    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 819: 187–195 (2019) Collembola of Canada 187 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.819.23653 REVIEW ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Collembola of Canada Matthew S. Turnbull1, Sophya Stebaeva2 1 Unaffiliated, Kingston, Ontario, Canada2 The Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Aca- demy of Sciences, Leninskii pr. 33, Moscow 119071, Russia Corresponding author: Matthew S. Turnbull ([email protected]) Academic editor: D. Langor | Received 16 January 2018 | Accepted 8 May 2018 | Published 24 January 2019 http://zoobank.org/3A331779-19A1-41DA-AFCF-81AAD4CB049F Citation: Turnbull MS, Stebaeva S (2019) Collembola of Canada. In: Langor DW, Sheffield CS (Eds) The Biota of Canada – A Biodiversity Assessment. Part 1: The Terrestrial Arthropods. ZooKeys 819: 187–195.https://doi. org/10.3897/zookeys.819.23653 Abstract The state of knowledge of diversity of Collembola in Canada was assessed by examination of literature and DNA barcode data. There are 474 described extant Collembola species known from Canada, a significant change compared to the 520 species estimated to occur in Canada in 1979 (Richards 1979) and the 341 reported in the most recent national checklist (Skidmore 1993). Given the number of indeterminate or cryptic species records, the dearth of sampling in many regions, and the growing use of genetic biodiversity assessment methods such as Barcode Index Numbers, we estimate the total diversity of Collembola in Canada to be approximately 675 species. Advances in Collembola systematics and Canadian research are discussed. Keywords biodiversity assessment, Biota of Canada, Collembola, springtails Collembola, commonly known as springtails, is a class of small, entognathous, wing- less hexapods that is a sister group to Insecta.
  • Empirically Derived Indices of Biotic Integrity for Forested Wetlands, Coastal Salt Marshes and Wadable Freshwater Streams in Massachusetts

    Empirically Derived Indices of Biotic Integrity for Forested Wetlands, Coastal Salt Marshes and Wadable Freshwater Streams in Massachusetts

    Empirically Derived Indices of Biotic Integrity for Forested Wetlands, Coastal Salt Marshes and Wadable Freshwater Streams in Massachusetts September 15, 2013 This report is the result of several years of field data collection, analyses and IBI development, and consideration of the opportunities for wetland program and policy development in relation to IBIs and CAPS Index of Ecological Integrity (IEI). Contributors include: University of Massachusetts Amherst Kevin McGarigal, Ethan Plunkett, Joanna Grand, Brad Compton, Theresa Portante, Kasey Rolih, and Scott Jackson Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management Jan Smith, Marc Carullo, and Adrienne Pappal Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Lisa Rhodes, Lealdon Langley, and Michael Stroman Empirically Derived Indices of Biotic Integrity for Forested Wetlands, Coastal Salt Marshes and Wadable Freshwater Streams in Massachusetts Abstract The purpose of this study was to develop a fully empirically-based method for developing Indices of Biotic Integrity (IBIs) that does not rely on expert opinion or the arbitrary designation of reference sites and pilot its application in forested wetlands, coastal salt marshes and wadable freshwater streams in Massachusetts. The method we developed involves: 1) using a suite of regression models to estimate the abundance of each taxon across a gradient of stressor levels, 2) using statistical calibration based on the fitted regression models and maximum likelihood methods to predict the value of the stressor metric based on the abundance of the taxon at each site, 3) selecting taxa in a forward stepwise procedure that conditionally improves the concordance between the observed stressor value and the predicted value the most and a stopping rule for selecting taxa based on a conditional alpha derived from comparison to pseudotaxa data, and 4) comparing the coefficient of concordance for the final IBI to the expected distribution derived from randomly permuted data.
  • Diversity and Ecosystem Services of Trichoptera

    Diversity and Ecosystem Services of Trichoptera

    Review Diversity and Ecosystem Services of Trichoptera John C. Morse 1,*, Paul B. Frandsen 2,3, Wolfram Graf 4 and Jessica A. Thomas 5 1 Department of Plant & Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, E-143 Poole Agricultural Center, Clemson, SC 29634-0310, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Plant & Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University, 701 E University Parkway Drive, Provo, UT 84602, USA; [email protected] 3 Data Science Lab, Smithsonian Institution, 600 Maryland Ave SW, Washington, D.C. 20024, USA 4 BOKU, Institute of Hydrobiology and Aquatic Ecology Management, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Gregor Mendelstr. 33, A-1180 Vienna, Austria; [email protected] 5 Department of Biology, University of York, Wentworth Way, York Y010 5DD, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-864-656-5049 Received: 2 February 2019; Accepted: 12 April 2019; Published: 1 May 2019 Abstract: The holometabolous insect order Trichoptera (caddisflies) includes more known species than all of the other primarily aquatic orders of insects combined. They are distributed unevenly; with the greatest number and density occurring in the Oriental Biogeographic Region and the smallest in the East Palearctic. Ecosystem services provided by Trichoptera are also very diverse and include their essential roles in food webs, in biological monitoring of water quality, as food for fish and other predators (many of which are of human concern), and as engineers that stabilize gravel bed sediment. They are especially important in capturing and using a wide variety of nutrients in many forms, transforming them for use by other organisms in freshwaters and surrounding riparian areas.
  • Aquatic Insects: Bryophyte Habitats and Fauna

    Aquatic Insects: Bryophyte Habitats and Fauna

    Glime, J. M. 2017. Aquatic Insects: Bryophyte Habitats and Fauna. Chapt. 11-3. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 2. 11-3-1 Bryological Interaction. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 19 July 2020 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology2/>. CHAPTER 11-3 AQUATIC INSECTS: BRYOPHYTE HABITATS AND FAUNA TABLE OF CONTENTS Aquatic Bryophyte Habitat and Fauna ..................................................................................................................... 11-3-2 Streams .............................................................................................................................................................. 11-3-4 Streamside ......................................................................................................................................................... 11-3-7 Artificial Bryophytes ......................................................................................................................................... 11-3-7 Preference Experiment ...................................................................................................................................... 11-3-8 Torrents and waterfalls ...................................................................................................................................... 11-3-9 Springs .............................................................................................................................................................
  • The Zoogeomorphology of Case-Building Caddisfly Larvae

    The Zoogeomorphology of Case-Building Caddisfly Larvae

    The zoogeomorphology of case-building caddisfly larvae by Richard Mason A Doctoral thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy of Loughborough University (June 2020) © Richard Mason 2020 i Abstract Caddisfly (Trichoptera) are an abundant and widespread aquatic insect group. Caddisfly larvae of most species build cases from silk and fine sediment at some point in their lifecycle. Case- building caddisfly have the potential to modify the distribution and transport of sediment by: 1) altering sediment properties through case construction, and 2) transporting sediment incorporated into cases over the riverbed. This thesis investigates, for the first time, the effects of bioconstruction by case-building caddisfly on fluvial geomorphology. The research was conducted using two flume experiments to understand the mechanisms of caddisfly zoogeomorphology (case construction and transporting sediment), and two field investigations that increase the spatial and temporal scale of the research. Caddisfly cases varied considerably in mass between species (0.001 g - 0.83 g) and grain sizes used (D50 = 0.17 mm - 4 mm). As a community, caddisfly used a wide range of grain-sizes in case construction (0.063 mm – 11 mm), and, on average, the mass of incorporated sediment was 38 g m-2, in a gravel-bed stream. This sediment was aggregated into biogenic particles (cases) which differed in size and shape from their constituent grains. A flume experiment determined that empty cases of some caddisfly species (tubular case-builders; Limnephilidae and Sericostomatidae) were more mobile than their incorporated sediment, but that dome shaped Glossosomatidae cases moved at the same entrainment threshold as their constituent grains, highlighting the importance of case design as a control on caddisfly zoogeomorphology.
  • This Work Is Licensed Under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

    This Work Is Licensed Under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

    This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA. THE ADULT POLYCENTROPODIDAE OF CANADA AND ADJACENT UNITED STATES Andrew P. Nimmo Department of Entomology University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E3 Quaestiones Entomologicae CANADA 22:143-252 1986 ABSTRACT Of the 46 species reported herefrom Canada and adjacent States of the United States, four belong to the genus Cernotina Ross, one to Cyrnellus (Banks), three to Neureclipsis McLachlan, five to Nyctiophylax Brauer, and 33 to Polycentropus Curtis. Keys are provided (for males and females, both, where possible) to genera and species. For each species the habitus is given in some detail, with diagnostic statements for the genitalia. Also included are brief statements on biology (if known), and distribution. Distributions are mapped, and genitalia are fully illustrated. RESUME Quarante six especes de Polycentropodidae sont mentionneespour le Canada et les Hats frontaliers des Etats-Vnis, representant les genres suivants: Cernotina Ross (4), Cyrnellus (Banks) (I), Neureclipsis McLachlan (3), Nyctiophylax Brauer (5) et Polycentropus Curtis (33). Des clefs d'identification au genre et a I'espece (pour les males et les feme I les) sont presentees par I'auteur. Un habitus ainsi qui une description diagnostique des pieces genitals sont donnes pour chacune des especes. Une description resume ce qui il y a de connir sur I'histoire naturelle et la repartition geographique de ces especes.
  • Download Full Article in PDF Format

    Download Full Article in PDF Format

    DIRECTEUR DE LA PUBLICATION : Bruno David Président du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle RÉDACTRICE EN CHEF / EDITOR-IN-CHIEF : Laure Desutter-Grandcolas ASSISTANTS DE RÉDACTION / ASSISTANT EDITORS : Anne Mabille ([email protected]), Emmanuel Côtez MISE EN PAGE / PAGE LAYOUT : Anne Mabille COMITÉ SCIENTIFIQUE / SCIENTIFIC BOARD : James Carpenter (AMNH, New York, États-Unis) Maria Marta Cigliano (Museo de La Plata, La Plata, Argentine) Henrik Enghoff (NHMD, Copenhague, Danemark) Rafael Marquez (CSIC, Madrid, Espagne) Peter Ng (University of Singapore) Gustav Peters (ZFMK, Bonn, Allemagne) Norman I. Platnick (AMNH, New York, États-Unis) Jean-Yves Rasplus (INRA, Montferrier-sur-Lez, France) Jean-François Silvain (IRD, Gif-sur-Yvette, France) Wanda M. Weiner (Polish Academy of Sciences, Cracovie, Pologne) John Wenzel (The Ohio State University, Columbus, États-Unis) COUVERTURE / COVER : Ptenothrix italica Dallai, 1973. Body size: 1.4 mm, immature. Zoosystema est indexé dans / Zoosystema is indexed in: – Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch®) – ISI Alerting Services® – Current Contents® / Agriculture, Biology, and Environmental Sciences® – Scopus® Zoosystema est distribué en version électronique par / Zoosystema is distributed electronically by: – BioOne® (http://www.bioone.org) Les articles ainsi que les nouveautés nomenclaturales publiés dans Zoosystema sont référencés par / Articles and nomenclatural novelties published in Zoosystema are referenced by: – ZooBank® (http://zoobank.org) Zoosystema est une revue en flux continu publiée par les Publications scientifiques du Muséum, Paris / Zoosystema is a fast track journal published by the Museum Science Press, Paris Les Publications scientifiques du Muséum publient aussi / The Museum Science Press also publish: Adansonia, Anthropozoologica, European Journal of Taxonomy, Geodiversitas, Naturae. Diffusion – Publications scientifiques Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle CP 41 – 57 rue Cuvier F-75231 Paris cedex 05 (France) Tél.