Irakli Charkviani Hologram – a Concert That Will Remain to History

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Irakli Charkviani Hologram – a Concert That Will Remain to History VISIT WEBSITE & READ DAILY NEWS DECEMBER 14, 2015 N 3 yovelkvireuli orenovani gazeTi saqarTveloSi WEEKLY BILINGUAL NEWSPAPER IN GEORGIA WHY RUSSIA QUITS GENEVA EU’S VISA LIBERALIZATION TALKS SO FREQUENTLY? P. 2 ATTRACTS RESIDENTS OF ABKHAZIA & S. OSSETIA P. 8 In the framework of the Geneva talks, the essential assignment for the Georgian side is, on one hand, to conceptualize Russia as the conflict side and, on the POTI FREE INDUSTRIAL other hand, to prevent de facto regimes from becom- ZONE PLANNING ing delegates as sovereign bodies. The Geneva inter- national discussions are crucially important for Geor- NEW INVESTMENTS P.10 gia, as it remains the only platform for discussing se- curity-related issues and the humanitarian needs of the conflict-affected population. WHAT CAUSED THE INFLATION RATE GAZPROM DEEPENS IT’S ROLE IN TO RISE IN GEORGIA? P. 12 THE GEORGIAN ENERGY SECTOR P.9 THINGS YOU SHOULD KNOW BEFORE SEEKING MEDICAL According to Kaladze, Georgia should diversify its import routes and sources to ensure viable prices TREATMENT ABROAD P. 14 on the energy market. Gazprom’s resources can help reduce the gap in supply, though cooperation with Iran is not to be excluded. This fact is not IRAKLI CHARKVIANI welcomed by Azerbaijan. In parallel to the Kaladze- Miller negotiations, Georgia needs to assert that HOLOGRAM – A CONCERT THAT Azerbaijan will remain its primary energy partner. WILL REMAIN TO HISTORY P.17 DECEMBER 14, 2015 2 WWW.OBSERVER.COM.GE POLITICS WHY RUSSIA QUITS GENEVA TALKS SO FREQUENTLY? GURAM PTSKIALADZE (BULGARIA) he 34th round of Geneva Talks took place on December 8-9 within two T working groups under the supervision of the representatives of OSCE, UN and EU. Within the first working group, core issues included the ongoing security problem in the Separatist Regions caused by the November 26 agreement between Russia and the de facto regimes on creating joint military forces. Additionally, Georgian representatives raised the issue of a growing number of military instructions and the viola- tion of air space controlled by the Georgian government. In this discussion format, issues such as continuing construction of wire entanglements, artificial obstacles, cases of kidnapping and prisoning Georgian citizens were brought up. Russian military forces accused citizens of encroaching on the de facto border. During the second working group, the Georgian delegation drew attention to the following topics: free movement of people, the right to receive education in one’s mother tongue, the necessity of securing human rights on occu- pied territories and restrictions on in the study of Georgian language in the Gali region. In addition, the Georgian delegation called on the Russian side to make a pledge on the non-use of force. Georgia officially signed the agreement on the non-use of force on November 23, 2010, and wants Russia to do the issue of displaced persons, it is Georgia. By agreeing with it, tor but as a delegate. Furthermore, meeting, they quit and issues are the same. clear that Russia and the separatist Tbilisi implicitly recognizes that during the meetings Georgia asks postponed until the next round of After 6 hours of discussion, the regimes do not have the will to Russia was not involved in the distressing questions to the Russian talks. meeting was terminated by the compromise. August 2008 war and, by holding side and, when these questions are It is notable that the leader of the Russian side accompanied by the de In a broader context, Russian direct discussions, would allow the related to red line issues for Russia Free Democrats Party, Irakli Alasa- facto regime delegations while refusals to be deemed the conflict occupied regions to have a degree (for example, repatriation of dis- nia, made an announcement about a talking about displaced persons and side provides a further obstacle for of sovereignty that is totally unac- placed people), , it quits discussion novel initiative to create a new their rights to repatriation. The next the negotiation process. Russia ceptable for Georgia. to avoid inconvenient situations and Germany-Georgia-Russia negotia- meeting will be held on 22-23 continuously indicates that Georgia The question of why Russia quit responsibilities. Their unfavorable tion arrangement. According to March, 2016 – according to the should start direct discussions with the Geneva talks is answered as status leads Russia and the sepa- him, Georgia would use such website of the Ministry of Foreign the separatist regimes. This kind of follows: Russia feels uncomfortable ratist regimes to refuse many format to bring its interests to light, Affairs of Georgia. settlement is unacceptable for as it is not represented as a media- agreements and at the end of the and Germany is believed to be a In the framework of the Geneva country which can help reach an talks, the essential assignment for interim accord between Georgia the Georgian side is, on one hand, and Russia. If the new initiative to conceptualize Russia as the becomes a reality, the Geneva talks conflict side and, on the other hand, will not be the only platform for to prevent de facto regimes from Georgia to express its concerns on becoming delegates as sovereign the international stage. As Alasania bodies. pointed out, his initiative will not The Geneva international threaten the Geneva talks. discussions are crucially important Creating such a format means for Georgia, as it remains the only that Russia is about to start negotia- platform for discussing security- tions with Georgia arbitrated by a related issues and the humanitarian mediator, with whom Russia finds needs of the conflict-affected it easier to concur, in contrast to population. Moreover, it enables distinguished organizations or the Georgian side to draw the countries. On the other hand, international community’s attention having the only arbiter enables to issues vis-à-vis the occupied Russia to operate more trouble- regions. freely (while at Geneva talks the At the 34th Round of Geneva, country has to defend itself face-to- talks Georgia tried to raise primary face with several mediators). It is in points and restart discussions on the Georgia`s interests that, in case of most important topics. There are implementing this new format, some issues making it impossible Geneva talks should not lose its for the parties to make any agree- significance. Whereas Russia might ment, which is why Russia aban- appeal that Geneva talks are not dons the round table format. Dis- functional anymore and it should be cussing such problems becomes a terminated. The best outcome for stumbling block preventing pro- Georgia would be if the novel gress. Considering that this meeting format co-exists in parallel to the broke off during discussions over current platform. DECEMBER 14, 2015 3 WWW.OBSERVER.COM.GE DECEMBER 14, 2015 4 WWW.OBSERVER.COM.GE POLITICS GEORGIA EXPECTS EUROPEAN COMMISSION TO APPROVE VISA-FREE TRAVEL REGIME TEIMURAZ SHA eorgian society eagerly the EUMM visit, the Head of the is a basis for positive expectations. awaits December 15, European Union Delegation to Georgia has successfully attained 2015 – the day the Georgia, Ambassador Janos Her- most of goals of the Visa Liberali- G European Commission man, stated that Georgia has al- zation Action Plan (VLAP) but should present its report on the ready completed the majority of the there is much to do in the future.” achievements of Georgia in imple- requests of the VLAP. On December 9, the “Die mentation of the Visa-Liberali- On November 18, during the EU Welt”, German national daily zation Action Plan (VLAP), which -Georgia Association Council newspaper has published an article the Georgian government received meeting in Brussels, Vice-President on the visa-liberalization policy for from the EU on February 25, 2013. of the European Commission Georgia, Ukraine and Turkey, Visa Liberalization between Federica Mogherini made a state- which will be launched by EU in Georgia and EU means that holders ment on visa liberalization: mid-2016. According to the “Die of Georgian biometric passports “The European Commission Welt”, that information was provid- will be able to travel visa-free to will present its decision about a ed by the anonymous diplomatic Schengen Area states (including visa liberalization plan on Decem- source who is a high position non-EU states including Norway, ber 15, but I would like to say there official in European Commision. Switzerland and Iceland) and Cyp- rus, Croatia, Romania, and Bulgaria for 90 days in any six-month period. Visa Liberalization policy also covers visa-free travel to the Western Balkan countries (Serbia, FYR of Macedonia, Montenegro policy, additional recommendations Eastern Partnership summit in and Albania), but does not include and the preparedness of Georgia. Riga, EU officials stated that the United Kingdom and Republic On April 28, 2014, the Republic Georgia has completed 7 out of 15 of Ireland, which have their own of Moldova became the first state requested paragraphs of the action individual visa policies. from the EU Eastern Partnership plan. Particularly, EU officials Though a positive report pre- group to receive a visa-free regime referenced migration policy, human sented by the European Commis- with the EU. Notably, the EU trafficking and counter-terrorism. sion does not mean that the EU will proposed a Visa-Liberalization On September 28, the European open its borders to Georgian Action Plan to Moldova on June Union Monitoring Mission started citizens, it is an evaluation of 15, 2010, and it took roughly 4 its visit to Georgia in order to already-implemented VLAP mea- years to implement all the requests evaluate implementation of the sures. The EC also makes recom- of the EU (including those of the VLAP, and the readiness of the mendations to the European Parlia- influential Romanian lobby).
Recommended publications
  • Ideologia Da Lingvisturi Ideebi IDEOLOGY and LINGUISTIC IDEAS
    ggiorgiiorgi aaxvledianisxvledianis ssaxelobisaxelobis eenaTmecnierebisnaTmecnierebis iistoriisstoriis ssazogadoebaazogadoeba iivanevane jjavaxiSvilisavaxiSvilis ssaxelobisaxelobis TTbilisisbilisis ssaxelmwifoaxelmwifo uuniversitetiniversiteti ssaerTaSorisoaerTaSoriso kkonferenciaonferencia iideologiadeologia ddaa llingvisturiingvisturi iideebideebi IINTERNATIONALNTERNATIONAL CONFERENCECONFERENCE IIDEOLOGYDEOLOGY AANDND LLINGUISTICINGUISTIC IDEASIDEAS 6-9 ooqtomberi,qtomberi, 22017017 / OOCTOBERCTOBER 66-9,-9, 22017017 pprogramarograma ddaa TTezisebisezisebis kkrebulirebuli PProgramrogram aandnd AAbstractsbstracts TTbilisibilisi 22017017 gamomcemloba grifoni giorgi axvledianis saxelobis enaTmecnierebis istoriis sazogadoeba ivane javaxiSvilis saxelobis Tbilisis saxelmwifo universiteti saerTaSoriso konferencia ideologia da lingvisturi ideebi 6-9 oqtomberi, 2017, Tbilisi, saqarTvelo programa da Tezisebis krebuli TTbilisibilisi 22017017 GIORGI AKHVLEDIANI SOCIETY FOR THE HISTORY OF LINGUISTICS IVANE JAVAKHISHVILI TBILISI STATE UNIVERSITY INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE IDEOLOGY AND LINGUISTIC IDEAS 6-9 OCTOBER, 2017, TBILISI, GEORGIA Program and Abstracts Tbilisi 2017 saredaqcio sabWo TinaTin bolqvaZe (ivane javaxiSvilis saxelobis Tbilisis saxelmwifo universiteti, giorgi axvledianis saxelobis enaTmecnierebis istoriis sazogadoeba, Tbilisi, saqarTvelo) patrik serio (peterburgis universiteti, ruseTi/ lozanis universiteti, Sveicaria) kamiel hamansi (adam mickeviCis universiteti, poznani, poloneTi) TinaTin margalitaZe (ivane javaxiSvilis saxelobis Tbilisis
    [Show full text]
  • Kennan Institute Meeting Reports, 1991-2001
    OP #281: TEN YEARS AFTER THE BREAKUP: KENNAN INSTITUTE MEETING REPORTS, 1991–2001 Vol. VIII No. 18 1991 provoked. A dissident historian, having The Soviet Coup: Impressions of an Eyewitness talked a few minutes with a lieutenant atop a Kennan Institute Research Associate Mark H. tank, noted with relief, “These guys won’t be Teeter flew into Moscow on August 18th and shooting anyone.” One soldier calmly woke up the next morning to news of a coup. This reprimanded a television reporter with a report was transmitted by him via electronic mail statement of the obvious which everyone from the Institute’s Moscow representational needed to hear: “Hey, I’m human too.” One office. sensed that this was not Prague, not 1968. The events in Moscow of 19–21 August It shortly became clear that the center 1991 were clearly historic. As they began to of events would not be the Kremlin, but unfold, however, one soon came to wonder rather the Russian Federation’s administra- how the clamor, confusion, contradictory tive center, an ungainly white building in the information, and seemingly hourly changes Krasnaia Presnia district. A march down of tide could ever be turned into the kind of Kalinin Prospekt to this newly-christened bound-volume history, neat and compact, White House drew more and more adherents that we pass to succeeding generations. This along the way, but their motives were will surely happen, of course, and there is evidently various. A number of people were little doubt that the accounts of the Carrs, clearly Yeltsin supporters as such, chanting Paleologues, and Trotskys of this August will the Russian President’s name in unison every emerge a good deal sooner after the fact than few minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Nino Kereselidze Phd Thesis
    FOREIGN POLICY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION TOWARDS THE SOUTH CAUCASUS IN 1992-2014 Nino Kereselidze A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2015 Full metadata for this item is available in Research@StAndrews:FullText at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/6824 This item is protected by original copyright Foreign Policy of the European Union towards the South Caucasus in 1992-2014 Nino Kereselidze The thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews School of International Relations 7 May 2015 Scotland, United Kingdom 1. Candidate’s declarations: I, Nino Kereselidze, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 80,000 words in length, has been written by me, and that it is the record of work carried out by me, or principally by myself in collaboration with others as acknowledged, and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. I was admitted as a research student in September 2012 and as a candidate for the degree of September 2013; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between 2012 and 2015. Date 2 March 2015 signature of candidate ……… 2. Supervisor’s declaration: I, Rick Fawn, hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of PhD in the University of St Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Music Circulation And
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Music Circulation and Transmission in Tbilisi, Georgia A dissertation filed in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Ethnomusicology by Brigita Sebald 2013 ©Copyright by Brigita Sebald 2013 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Music Circulation and Transmission in Tbilisi, Georgia by Brigita Sebald Doctor of Philosophy in Ethnomusicology University of California, Los Angeles, 2013 Professor Timothy Rice, Chair This dissertation, based upon two years of ethnographic research in Tbilisi, Georgia, questions how popular music travels from the performer to the audience and how it circulates among audience members. After the disintegration of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s, the state- run music industry collapsed, taking the infrastructure for music distribution with it. In the years since, a music industry has not been rebuilt due to uncertain economic realities and a shaky political situation. Because of this, performers have difficulty spreading their music through the mass media or by selling it, and alternative distributory methods have developed. The concept of distribution, which is often associated with the activities of the music industry, is replaced with circulation, expressing music’s de-centralized movement and the role individuals play in making music move. This dissertation establishes two spheres through which music circulates: the first is characterized by a higher level of control by the government ii and by businesses, and musicians have limited access to it; the second involves a lower level of control, and therefore musicians and audience members can more easily utilize it. Certain musical styles, such as estrada and ethno-music (a combination of popular and traditional styles) are favored in the first, while other styles, such as heavy metal, circulate almost exclusively in the second.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Catalogue
    INTELEKTI PUBLISHING 2017Frankfurter Buchmesse 03NOVEL 41SHORT STORIES 57NON-FICTION 67POETRY 89CLASSICS INTELEKTI PUBLISHING founded in 1994 is one of the most active and prominent organizations in the Georgian cultural, educational and publishing realms. School textbooks for Georgian and foreign language schools; classic and modern Georgian literature; works of world literature and the most important modern authors discovered for the first time by Georgian readers; diaries and notes by well- known authors – these are the themes and projects actively pursued by Intelekti Publishing for more twenty years. INTELEKTI PUBLISHING introduces modern Georgian authors to international book markets and along with foreign publishing houses, facilitates the publication and popularization of their books in various different languages throughout the world. IRAKLI SAMSONADZE PAATA SHAMUGIA TEONA DOLENJASHVILI TAMAZ CHILADZE LASHA TABUKASHVILI BEKA KURKHULI NOVEL NINO SADGHOBELASHVILI IRAKLI CHARKVIANI GABRIEL TANIE TORESA MOSSY GELA CHKVANAVA BACHO KVIRTIA REZO TABUKASHVILI GAGA NAKHUTSRISHVILI GURAM MEGRELISHVILI ZVIAD KVARATSKHELIA 4 INTELEKTI publishing IRAKLI SAMSONADZE Born in 1961, Irakli Samsonadze is a contemporary Georgian writer and playwright. In 1983 he graduated from the journalism department of the Tbilisi State University. His first play AT MIDNIGHT was published in the magazine Khelovneba (Art) in 1985. Published books: THE TRIPTICH (plays, 2000); SUBURB (short stories, 2003); A TURKEY’S EGG (plays, 2010), FROM COMEDY TO TRAGEDY WITH AN ABSURD TICKET (plays, 2013), FRIGHTENED STREET (short stories, 2013), A FUNERAL WAKE IN THE WIND (Story, 2016); Intelekti Publishing published Irakli Samsonadze’s trilogy of novels: LEAH’S TIME (2010), A CUSHION (2012), DARINDA THE CLOUD (2012). About 15 plays by Irakli Samsonadze were staged in all the operating theaters in Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Op #281: Ten Years After the Breakup: Kennan Institute
    OP #281: TEN YEARS AFTER THE BREAKUP: KENNAN INSTITUTE MEETING REPORTS, 1991–2001 Vol. VIII No. 18 1991 provoked. A dissident historian, having The Soviet Coup: Impressions of an Eyewitness talked a few minutes with a lieutenant atop a Kennan Institute Research Associate Mark H. tank, noted with relief, “These guys won’t be Teeter flew into Moscow on August 18th and shooting anyone.” One soldier calmly woke up the next morning to news of a coup. This reprimanded a television reporter with a report was transmitted by him via electronic mail statement of the obvious which everyone from the Institute’s Moscow representational needed to hear: “Hey, I’m human too.” One office. sensed that this was not Prague, not 1968. The events in Moscow of 19–21 August It shortly became clear that the center 1991 were clearly historic. As they began to of events would not be the Kremlin, but unfold, however, one soon came to wonder rather the Russian Federation’s administra- how the clamor, confusion, contradictory tive center, an ungainly white building in the information, and seemingly hourly changes Krasnaia Presnia district. A march down of tide could ever be turned into the kind of Kalinin Prospekt to this newly-christened bound-volume history, neat and compact, White House drew more and more adherents that we pass to succeeding generations. This along the way, but their motives were will surely happen, of course, and there is evidently various. A number of people were little doubt that the accounts of the Carrs, clearly Yeltsin supporters as such, chanting Paleologues, and Trotskys of this August will the Russian President’s name in unison every emerge a good deal sooner after the fact than few minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Georgian Rose Revolution: Challenges and Supports for Ensuring the Non-Violent Outcome in a Post-Soviet Society
    Journal of Azerbaijani Studies 3 THE GEORGIAN ROSE REVOLUTION: CHALLENGES AND SUPPORTS FOR ENSURING THE NON-VIOLENT OUTCOME IN A POST-SOVIET SOCIETY Ramil Aliyev Tramso, Norway Chapter One Introduction This thesis is about the Georgian revolution that took place on 23 November 2003, popularly named the 'Rose Revolution.' It began in the form of street protests in the capital of the country against the falsification of the November 2003 parliamentary election, and culminated in the storming of the Georgian Parliament and the resignation of President Eduard Shevardnadze. Massive demonstra- tions were held in Tbilisi 20-23 November 2003 and tens of thousands of people participated. Mikheil Saakashvili, Zurab Zhvania, Nino Burjanadze and others led the demonstrations that ended with the collapse of the government. After an increasingly tense two weeks of protests, Shevardnadze bowed to the inevitable and resigned as president on 23 November 2003. The parliamentary speaker, Nino Burjanadze, replaced him on an interim basis. The exceptional feature of this revolution is that Georgia managed to overcome the gravest crisis of its latest history without shedding a single drop of blood. Considering Georgia's turbulent history and lack of strong democratic traditions, the non-violent character of the revolution was by no means self-evident. The question is whether the non-violent nature of the event was the result of a deliberate and well- planned strategy, or whether it was mere coincidence. In any case, the Georgian revolution attracted a lot of attention from the regional and Western media. The important feature of this revolution is that it happened non-violently in a former Soviet country.
    [Show full text]
  • Non Fiction from Georgia 2015
    NON FICTION FROM GEORGIA 2015 NON FICTION FROM GEORGIA / 2015 1 Non Fiction from Georgia Prepared and published by the Georgian National Book Center. The catalogue is distributed free of charge during the international Book Fairs to foreign publishers and editors. In case if you would like to receive PDF version of the catalogue, please contact: [email protected] Project Director Medea Metreveli Project Manager Nino Goginashvili Editors Irine Chogoshvili, Maia Danelia Contributors Georgian National Museum, Georgian Literature Museum, Goethe-Institute Tbilissi, G. Chubinashvili Centre for Art History, Foundation of Civic Education, Graphic Design Association Translators Patrick Donald Rayfield, Nino Goginashvili Design Manana Arabuli / zangodesign studio Georgian National Book Center Established in 2014 by the Ministry of Culture and Monument Pro- tection of Georgia supports the process of translation of Georgian and foreign literature, enhancing intercultural dialogue through lit- erature and presenting centuries-long Georgian intellectual heritage to the international literary and publishing arena. Contact Information: 4 Sanapiro Str. / 0105 Tbilisi / Georgia Email: [email protected] www.book.gov.ge Introduction Georgian art, history, philosophy, science, documentary prose, cookery… The literary materials that exist about Georgia and which have been produced in various periods and published between 2005 and 2015 in books and cata- logues will be of real interest to foreign readers interested in our country’s culture. The catalogue gathers together editions of both Georgian art and history, as well as samples of Non Fiction (documentary prose, memoirs, essays) by Georgian authors of several generations: these samples are of great relevance today, both in Georgia and beyond its borders, given current demands in the global literary and publishing context.
    [Show full text]