DOCSLIB.ORG

All the Truth Is Out: the Week Politics Went Tabloid Free

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
All the Truth Is Out: the Week Politics Went Tabloid Free FREE ALL THE TRUTH IS OUT: THE WEEK POLITICS WENT TABLOID PDF Matt Bai | 288 pages | 01 Jul 2016 | Random House USA Inc | 9780307474681 | English | New York, United States All the truth is out : the week politics went tabloid | Lafayette Library is closed until further notice. Outdoor book drops are open. No fines are charged on overdue items. View Library updates. Lafayette Public Library. My Account. Log Out. Search for. Advanced Search. Logged In As. Contact Us or Request Items. Curbside Pickup. Curbside pickup instructions. Featured Resources. Library Information. Other FLC Libraries. Average Rating. Bai, Matt. Choose a Format. On Shelf. Lafayette Nonfiction Area. Quick Copy View. See Full Copy Details. Place Hold. Date Edition Publisher Phys Desc. Language Availability First edition. Alfred A. Knopf, xv, pages : illustrations ; 24 cm. English On Shelf. More Info Place Hold. Available Online. Online OverDrive Collection. Check Out OverDrive. Add a Review. Add To List. Bush comfortably in the polls. And then- rumors of marital infidelity, an indelible photo of Hart and a model snapped near a fatefully named yacht Monkey Businessand it all came crashing down in a blaze of flashbulbs, the birth of hour news cycles, tabloid speculation, and late-night farce. Matt Bai shows how the Hart affair marked a crucial turning point in the ethos of political media-and, by extension, politics itself-when candidates' "character" began to draw more fixation than their political experience. Bai offers a poignant, highly original, and news-making reappraisal of Hart's fall from grace and overlooked political legacy as he makes the compelling case that this was the moment when the paradigm shifted-private lives became public, news became entertainment, and politics became the stuff of Page Six. Also in This Series. More Like This. More Copies In All the Truth Is Out: The Week Politics Went Tabloid. Loading Prospector Copies Table of Contents. From the Book - First edition. Loading Excerpt Similar Series From NoveList. Similar Titles From NoveList. Similar Authors From NoveList. Borrower Reviews. Librarian Reviews. Reviews from GoodReads. Loading GoodReads Reviews. Staff View. Reload Cover Reload Enrichment. More Details. On Shelf Lafayette Nonfiction Area Copies Location Call 1 of 1. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. Bush by double digits in the polls. Then, in one tumultuous week, rumors of marital All the Truth Is Out: The Week Politics Went Tabloid and a newspaper's stakeout of Hart's home resulted in a media frenzy the likes of which had never been seen before. Through the spellbindingly reported story of the Senator's fall from grace, Matt Bai, Yahoo News columnist and former chief political correspondent for The New York Times Magazine, shows the Hart affair to be far more than one man's tragedy: rather, it marked a crucial turning point in the ethos of political media, and the new norms of life in the public eye. All the Truth Is Out is a tour de force portrait of the American way of politics at the highest level, one that changes our understanding of how we elect our presidents and how the bedrock of American All the Truth Is Out: The Week Politics Went Tabloid has shifted under our feet. NPR Choice page Matt Bai writes in this book :. White was reasonably sure that only three presidential candidates he had ever met had denied themselves the pleasures invited by that aphrodisiac—Harry Truman, George Romney and Jimmy Carter. He was reasonably sure that all the others he had met had, at one time or another, on the campaign trail, accepted casual partners. Apple described what was probably a fairly typical experience for reporters covering the Kennedy White House:. In earlyfor example, a fledgling reporter for this newspaper was assigned to patrol the lobby of the Carlyle Hotel while President Kennedy was visiting New York City. There was little reason to fear being ambushed on the personal front while trying to make oneself accessible on the political front. When Thomas Eagleton, shortly after joining George McGovern on the Democratic ticket inwas revealed to have undergone shock treatment for depression, his temperament became a legitimate news story, along with the fact that he had neglected to mention it. After all, Gary and Lee Hart had fallen in love and married as kids, in the confines of a strict church where even dancing was prohibited. And so here he was, young and famous and sturdily good-looking, powerful in a city where power was everything, and friends knew that he and Lee—as so often happens with college sweethearts—had matured into different people, that she spent long periods back in Denver with the two kids, that she could drive him absolutely crazy at times. Why would they? Whose business was it, anyway? The newsweeklies—Time, Newsweek, and to a lesser extent U. And so it made sense that it was Fineman, a sharp and competitive reporter, who went where others on the bus were dying to go, and whose editors let him. Friends contend that his dating has been confined to marital separations—he and Lee have had two—nonetheless many political observers expect the rumors to emerge as a campaign issue. And so what happened next is that every reporter who scored a sit-down with Hart in the hours after his announcement, on what was supposed to be a triumphant cross-country tour, kept asking him about the long-standing rumors of his unspecified affairs, which in fact had been just as long-standing and unspecified the week before, but were only now—thanks to Newsweek—considered to have met the definition of news. When it got back to Hart that operatives for some of his rivals had been calling reporters in the days leading up to his announcement to fan the flame what would happen to the party if this stuff came out after he was nominated, when it was too late to get someone else onto the ballot? A candidate accusing rival campaigns of defaming him was a story any day of All the Truth Is Out: The Week Politics Went Tabloid week, no matter what the issue—that the issue here was sex, rather than, say, a proposal to tax foreign oil, only made it irresistible. Fiedler opened with an anecdote about Hart wandering to the back of the plane during the announcement tour, to face the reporters who were demanding he refute the rumors about affairs. Or should the media withhold publication until they have solid evidence of infidelity? The analysis ended with a quote from Hart himself. Written by McGee, Fiedler, and Savage, the 7,plus-word piece—Moby-Dick—type proportions by the standards of a front page—is remarkable reading, for a couple of reasons. It was p. Clearly, the reporters and editors at the Herald believed themselves to be reconstructing a scandal of similar proportions, the kind of thing that would lead to Pulitzers and movie deals. The solemn tone of the piece suggests that Fiedler and his colleagues believed themselves to be the only ones standing between America and another menacing, immoral president; reading it, you might think Hart had been caught bludgeoning a beautiful young woman to death, rather than taking her to dinner. He held his arms around his midsection and leaned forward slightly with his back against the brick wall. And he would remember his own sense of disbelief. Which was so not only out of character, but it was out of my own sense of who I was and what I was doing. And yet, for all that, Fiedler felt compelled to be there; he recalled no doubt about that. In fact, Fiedler would always remember that his overriding emotion in that alley was anger. It was Hart who had set all this in motion, who had dragged Fiedler and the others into the dirt and muck of tabloid journalism, by refusing to tell the truth about who he was. It was Hart who had disappointed and debased Fiedler, not the other way around. That this is the guy who only a few weeks before had stood up in front of the world—and, in a sense me, because I was there with the press corps—and talked about ethics, and said he wanted to be held to the highest standards and said he was going to run a campaign that exemplified all that. And here I am in an alley, late on a Saturday night, confronting him about a relationship that just seemed completely sordid. And I kind of felt angry about being in that position. Somewhere above the Atlantic seaboard, anyone sitting next to Fiedler would probably have seen him jolt upward in his seat as if suddenly receiving an electric current to his brain. There it was, All the Truth Is Out: The Week Politics Went Tabloid up at him from the page—Hart explicitly inviting him All the Truth Is Out: The Week Politics Went Tabloid his colleagues to do exactly the kind of surveillance they had undertaken the night before…. By morning, everyone who read the Times would know that Hart had goaded the press into hiding outside his townhouse and tracking his movements. Fiedler recoiled in his seat and winced. He looked mortified. Not only should the Herald never have been spying in the first place, they said, but this so-called surveillance was a joke. The two-pronged assault on the Herald story was as much for All the Truth Is Out: The Week Politics Went Tabloid benefit of the reporters—and their editors—as it was for their readers. But on this question of whether presidential candidates should be given the same treatment as a Jim Bakker or a Fawn Hall, the soap opera stars of nightly newscasts in the spring ofthe rest of the media still hung in the balance.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Norman Pearlstine, Chief Content Officer
    Mandatory Credit: Bloomberg Politics and the Media Panel: Bridging the Political Divide in the 2012 Elections Breakfast NORMAN PEARLSTINE, CHIEF CONTENT OFFICER, BLOOMBERG, LP: Thank you very much to all of you for coming this afternoon for this panel discussion and welcome to the Bloomberg Link. This is a project that a number of my colleagues have been working very hard on to - to get in shape having had a similar facility in Tampa last week. And as Al Hunt is fond of reminding me, eight years ago, Bloomberg was sharing space as far away from the perimeter and I guess any press could be. I think sharing that space with Al Jazeera -- About four years ago, we certainly had a press presence in Denver and St. Paul, but this year, we're a whole lot more active and a lot more aggressive and I think that reflects all the things that Bloomberg has been doing to increase its presence in Washington where, in the last two years through an acquisition and a start up, we've gone from a 145 journalists working at Bloomberg News to close to 2,000 employees and that reflects in large part the acquisition of BNA last September but also the start up of Bloomberg Government, a web based subscription service. And so over the next few days, we welcome you to come back to the Bloomberg Link for a number of events and hopefully, you'll get a chance to meet a number of my colleagues in the process. I'm very happy that we are able to start our activities in Charlotte with this panel discussion today, not only because of the subject matter, which is so important to journalism and to politics, but also because, quite selfishly, it's given me a chance to partner with Jeff Cowan and Center for Communication Leadership and Policy in Los Angeles at Annenberg USC, which Jeff, I was happy to be a co-chair of your board so, it's good to be able to - each of us to convince the other we ought to do this.
    [Show full text]
  • 130556 IOP.Qxd
    HARVARD UNIVERSITY John F. WINTER 2003 Kennedy School of Message from the Director INSTITUTE Government Spring 2003 Fellows Forum Renaming New Members of Congress OF POLITICS An Intern’s Story Laughter in the Forum: Jon Stewart on Politics and Comedy Welcome to the Institute of Politics at Harvard University D AN G LICKMAN, DIRECTOR The past semester here at the Institute brought lots of excitement—a glance at this newsletter will reveal some of the fine endeavors we’ve undertaken over the past months. But with a new year come new challenges. The November elections saw disturbingly low turnout among young voters, and our own Survey of Student Attitudes revealed widespread political disengagement in American youth. This semester, the Institute of Politics begins its new initiative to stop the cycle of mutual dis- engagement between young people and the world of politics. Young people feel that politicians don’t talk to them; and we don’t. Politicians know that young people don’t vote; and they don’t. The IOP’s new initiative will focus on three key areas: participation and engagement in the 2004 elections; revitalization of civic education in schools; and establishment of a national database of political internships. The students of the IOP are in the initial stages of research to determine the best next steps to implement this new initiative. We have experience To subscribe to the IOP’s registering college students to vote, we have had success mailing list: with our Civics Program, which sends Harvard students Send an email message to: [email protected] into community middle and elementary schools to teach In the body of the message, type: the importance of government and politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Article Racial Capitalism
    VOLUME 126 JUNE 2013 NUMBER 8 © 2013 by The Harvard Law Review Association ARTICLE RACIAL CAPITALISM Nancy Leong CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 2153 I. VALUING RACE ................................................................................................................... 2158 A. Whiteness as Property .................................................................................................... 2158 B. Diversity as Revaluation ................................................................................................ 2161 C. The Worth of Nonwhiteness .......................................................................................... 2169 II. A THEORY OF RACIAL CAPITALISM .............................................................................. 2172 A. Race as Social Capital .................................................................................................... 2175 B. Race as Marxian Capital ............................................................................................... 2183 C. Racial Capitalism ............................................................................................................ 2190 III. CRITIQUING RACIAL CAPITALISM ................................................................................. 2198 A. Commodification ............................................................................................................. 2199 B. Harm
    [Show full text]
  • The Front Runner
    The Front Runner Written by Matt Bai & Jay Carson & Jason Reitman July 27th, 2017 Blue Revisions 8/28/17 Pink Revisions 9/10/17 Yellow Revisions 9/15/17 ii. Note: The following screenplay features overlapping dialogue in the style of films like The Candidate. The idea is to create a true-to-life experience of the Hart campaign of 1987. CAST OF CHARACTERS THE HARTS GARY HART, SENATOR LEE HART, HIS WIFE THE CAMPAIGN TEAM BILL DIXON, CAMPAIGN MANAGER BILLY SHORE, AIDE-DE-CAMP KEVIN SWEENEY, PRESS SECRETARY JOHN EMERSON, DEPUTY CAMPAIGN MANAGER DOUG WILSON, POLICY AIDE MIKE STRATTON, LEAD ADVANCE MAN IRENE KELLY, SCHEDULER AT THE WASHINGTON POST BEN BRADLEE, EXECUTIVE EDITOR ANN DEVROY, POLITICAL EDITOR AJ PARKER, POLITICAL REPORTER DAVID BRODER, CHIEF POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT BOB KAISER, MANAGING EDITOR AT THE MIAMI HERALD KEITH MARTINDALE, EXECUTIVE EDITOR JIM SAVAGE, EDITOR TOM FIEDLER, POLITICAL REPORTER JOE MURPHY, INVESTIGATIVE REPORTER ROY VALENTINE, PHOTOGRAPHER THE TRAVELING PRESS JACK GERMOND, BALTIMORE SUN COLUMNIST IRA WYMAN, AP PHOTOGRAPHER ALAN WEINBERG, PHILADELHIA ENQUIRER ANN MCDANIEL, NEWSWEEK MIKE SHANAHAN, AP MIAMI DONNA RICE, MODEL AND ACTRESS BILLY BROADHURST, HART’S PERSONAL FRIEND LYNN ARMANDT, RICE’S FRIEND “1984” EXT. SAINT FRANCIS HOTEL, SAN FRANCISCO. NIGHT. We open inside a NEWS VAN. Four monitors show different competing feeds. A waiting reporter. Color Bars. A political commercial. One monitor is cueing up a debate clip. A light pops on the reporter and he springs to life. TV REPORTER Yes, we learned just a few minutes ago that Senator Hart will soon be leaving this hotel back to the convention hall, where he will concede -- yes, he will concede -- to former vice president Walter Mondale.
    [Show full text]
  • Senator Bill Bradley Talks About Making a Better America at the National Constitution Center
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACTS: Ashley Berke Public Relations Manager 215.409.6693 [email protected] SENATOR BILL BRADLEY TALKS ABOUT MAKING A BETTER AMERICA AT THE NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER Philadelphia, PA (January 2, 2008) – The National Constitution Center welcomes Senator Bill Bradley – bestselling author, New York Knicks star, and former presidential candidate – to discuss his book, The New American Story, on how to make America a better, stronger, truer country. Matt Bai, national political writer for the New York Times Magazine and author of The Argument, will moderate the discussion. This program will be held on Tuesday, January 22, 2008 at 6:30 p.m. Admission is $12 for members, $15 for non-members, and $6 for K-12 students and teachers. Reservations are required and can be made by calling 215.409.6700 or at www.consititutioncenter.org. Based on Bradley’s acclaimed New York Times op-ed piece, The New American Story argues that a strong nation requires a stronger two-party system with leaders who will tell the truth to the American people. Bradley argues that the Republican Party has built a solid pyramid structure, starting in the 1970s, at the base of which are money, ideas, and media, whereas the Democratic Party’s structure is an inverted pyramid, relying on too much pressure from a charismatic leader to hold it up. Bradley’s call to action is addressed not only to the parties and elected leaders, but to citizens as well. He proposes actions that every American can take to shape our nation’s future. Bill Bradley has been an Olympic Gold Medalist, a Rhodes Scholar, a professional basketball player, and a thrice-elected U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics, Policy and the Internet:Charity 5/2/08 15:39 Page 1
    Politics, policy and the internet:Charity 5/2/08 15:39 Page 1 CENTRE FOR POLICY STUDIES “In January 2007, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama launched their bids for the most powerful position in the world. But there was no bunting or cheering crowds. Instead, both candidates for the US Presidency made their announcements in a manner inconceivable just a few years ago: they released videos on their websites.” Politics, Policy and Television and radio transformed the way politics operated in the twentieth century. And, predicts the Internet Robert Colvile, the internet could do the same in the twenty-first. Yet the main British political parties are failing to exploit its potential. The BNP website has the ROBERT COLVILE same market share as all of the other major political parties combined. The internet will bring a far greater openness to politics, helping the activist and the citizen hold politicians to account. The web could also re-empower MPs, by linking them far more directly to the concerns of their constituents. And for policy development, the internet will revolutionise the way policy-making works. The most subtle, but perhaps most powerful, change, may be to the public’s mindset. As we grow used to the instant availability of information online, we will no longer tolerate delay and obfuscation in getting similar information from government. The individual, and not the state, will be the master in the digital age. Price: £5.00 Politics, Policy and the Internet ROBERT COLVILE CENTRE FOR POLICY STUDIES 57 Tufton Street, London SW1P 3QL 2008 THE AUTHOR ROBERT COLVILE is a features editor and leader writer at The Daily Telegraph, where he also writes extensively about technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Obama at Manassas
    mike davis Editorial OBAMA AT MANASSAS n election eve last November, the little city of Manassas, Virginia became the improbable Woodstock of Generation Obama as thousands gathered to hear their candidate close his almost two-year-long campaign with a final appeal for O‘Change in America’. It was a grand finale orchestrated with consider- able self-confidence and irony. Although Manassas (population, 37,000) retains blue-collar grit, the rest of Prince William County (380,000) epitomizes the greedy sprawl of the Bush era: a disorganized landscape of older townhouses, newer McMansions, faux-historical shopping centres, high-tech business parks, evangelical mega-churches, pariah islands of apartment housing, and melancholy vestiges of a graceful Virginia countryside. Assuring the County a prominent footnote in Tom Clancy novels, its southeastern corner is annexed by Marine Corps Base Quantico and the fbi national training centre. As the Dixie edge of ‘Los Angeles on the Potomac’ and the seventh rich- est large county in the United States, Prince William is precisely the kind of ‘outer’ or ‘emergent’ suburb which Karl Rove famously mobilized to re-elect George W. Bush in 2004.1 Indeed, since Nixon’s victory over Hubert Humphrey in 1968, the Republican Party has counted on Sunbelt suburbs like Prince William County to generate winning margins in national elections. Reaganomics, of course, was incubated in the famous tax revolts that shook suburban California in the late 1970s, while Newt Gingrich’s 1994 ‘Contract with America’ was primarily a magna carta for affluent voters in Western exurbs and New South edge cities.
    [Show full text]
  • White Privilege: What It Is, What It Is Not, and How It Shapes American Discussions of Policing and Historical Iconography
    WHITE PRIVILEGE: WHAT IT IS, WHAT IT IS NOT, AND HOW IT SHAPES AMERICAN DISCUSSIONS OF POLICING AND HISTORICAL ICONOGRAPHY Neil H. Buchanan* Abstract What is White privilege? In this Essay, I explore the privileges that White men take for granted in dealing with the police, even as I acknowledge that the most privileged Americans are still potentially subject to arbitrary and unaccountable police abuses. I also examine the debate over changing the names of places in the United States, as well as taking down the statues of the people who have long been treated as heroes, including the founding generation. The common thread between these two topics is that privilege allows White people not even to notice when they receive favorable treatment. They do not feel privileged when dealing with the police, because their baseline assumption is that they will not be targeted because of their race. They do not feel privileged when thinking about the heroes of American history, because history has always been written largely as the story of White men; so if anyone else tries to think about history in a different way, the proposed changes challenge White people‘s long-held presumptions. It is those very presumptions that are the evidence of privilege. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 100 I. WHITE PRIVILEGE ................................................................... 103 A. Everyone Should Have My Privilege (at Least) ............. 103 B. Understanding Privilege, or At Least Trying To ............ 107 II. STATUES AND PLACE NAMES: WHO IS HONORED, AND WHY? ............................................................................. 114 A. The Statues and Place Names Compromise Is This Decade’s Version of Civil Unions ...................... 114 B.
    [Show full text]
  • © Copyright, Princeton University Press
    © Copyright, Princeton University Press. © Copyright, Princeton University Press. John Sides and Lynn Vavreck The Gamble Choice and Chance in the 2012 Presidential Election High Rollers Princeton University Press Princeton and oxford © Copyright, Princeton University Press. High Rollers is a preliminary version of chapter 5 in The Gamble, by John Sides and Lynn Vavreck, to be published by Princeton University Press in August 2013. Copyright © 2013 by Princeton University Press Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, 6 Oxford Street, Woodstock, Oxfordshire OX20 1TW press.princeton.edu All Rights Reserved eISBN 978-1-4008-4571-2 © Copyright, Princeton University Press. t he Gamble Introduction Almost twice as many jobs were added to the U.S. economy in 2011 than in 2010, but roughly thirteen million Americans remained out of work. The economy was growing, but the global financial crisis still cast a long shadow. Would even modest economic growth be enough to usher the incumbent president back into office? Barack Obama was betting on it. Meanwhile, an already volatile Republican nominating process was revving up as the Iowa caucus approached on January 3. Could the party come to embrace an also- ran from the 2008 election who had previously supported abortion rights, gay rights, and a government- led overhaul of health care? Mitt Romney was betting on it. Once the general election was under way, voters across America would place their own bet: which of these candidates would help restore the country’s prosperity? The Gamble: Choice and Chance in the 2012 Presidential Elec- tion is about these bets.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rhetoric of Rogue Ethos: Chris Christie's Swing from “Boss”
    Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric, Vol. 4, No.1/2, 2014, pp. 19-38. The Rhetoric of Rogue Ethos: Chris Christie’s Swing from “Boss” to “Bully” Jeffrey P. Mehltretter Drury In the span of a year—from January 2013 to January 2014—public perception of New Jersey Governor Chris Christie shifted from viewing him as a “Boss” and rising GOP leader to a “Bully” and a vindictive politician. This essay explains this shift in approval through the concept of “rogue ethos,” loosely translated as rogue credibility, as it applies to Christie’s rhetorical responses to Hurricane Sandy relief and the George Washington Bridge scandal. I argue that Christie’s rhetoric provided conflicting constructions of his status as a leader. More precisely, Christie framed his response to Sandy relief from a moral standpoint of republican leadership while he framed his bridge scandal response from a personal, and hence selfish, vantage point that contradicted the earlier ethos. These two situations underscore the importance of community values undergirding rogue conduct and help theorize the risks of rogue ethos. Key Words: Chris Christie, rogue, ethos, political rhetoric, value appeals Throughout 2013, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie was a rising star of the GOP with wide cross-over appeal. In January, TIME magazine’s cover story labeled him “The Boss.”1 In Febru- ary, USA Today championed Christie as the GOP’s “best bet” for a White House bid in 2016, noting that he has “the highest approval rating of any governor in the country.”2 A June Gallup survey of more than 1,500 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Not Black, Not Black Enough and Both Satirical Investigations of Race in Percival Everett’S Novels
    Not Black, Not Black Enough and Both Satirical Investigations of Race in Percival Everett’s Novels Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Philosophie am Fachbereich Philosophie und Geisteswissenschaften vorgelegt von Johannes Kohrs Berlin, 2020 Erstgutachterin: Prof. Dr. Ulla Haselstein Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Florian Sedlmeier Tag der Disputation: 19. Dezember 2018 Acknowledgements I dedicate this work to my wife Laura for her loving support throughout the tumultuous experience of writing this book. I would like to thank my family, my mom for introducing me to the world of music and art and my dad for putting a Baldwin in my hands when I was seventeen or so. This work would not have been possible without the critical feedback and generous encouragement of Ulla Haselstein. My sincere gratitude goes to her, Florian Sedlmeier and Anthony Stewart. Among those, who have profoundly contributed to this work with their critical comments and suggestions, I would like to thank Christa Buschendorf, Marie Moeller, Joe Weixlmann and Ramon Saldivar. Special thanks are due to Nic Lindenberg and Katharina Metz. Finally: a shout-out to the “radical cohort.” Six years ago, a friend of mine told me about a hysterical satire titled erasure that I really should read. I would like to thank Marlon Lieber, with whom this whole thing started, and Percival Everett, whose friendship is much more than a footnote in this critical endeavor. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Race, Cultural Difference and Percival Everett’s Post-Millennial 4 Novels
    [Show full text]
  • FOR RELEASE March 26, 2014 for FURTHER INFORMATION on THIS REPORT: Amy Mitchell, Director of Journalism Dana Page, Communicatio
    NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE March 26, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT: Amy Mitchell, Director of Journalism Dana Page, Communications Manager 202.419.4372 www.pewresearch.org RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, March, 2014, “State of the News Media 2014: The Growth in Digital Reporting: What It Means for Journalism and News Consumers.” EMBARGOED COPY – NOT FOR PUBLICATION OR DISTRIBUTION UNTIL 00:00 a.m./p.m. EDT, MONTH DATE, YEAR 1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER About This Report This report is a component of the State of the News Media 2014, the eleventh edition of the annual report by the Pew Research Center examining the landscape of American journalism. This year’s study includes special reports about the revenue picture for news, the growth in digital reporting, the role of acquisitions and content sharing in local news and how digital video affects the news landscape. In addition, it provides the latest data on audience, economic, news investment and ownership trends for key sectors of news media. The full study is available online and includes a database with news industry trend data and a slideshow about how news functions on social media. This report is a collaborative effort based on the input and analysis of the following individuals. Find related reports about trends in journalism at pewresearch.org/journalism. Mark Jurkowitz, Associate Director Amy Mitchell, Director of Journalism Research Katerina Eva Matsa, Research Analyst Jan Lauren Boyles, Research Associate Michael Keegan, Graphics Director Monica Anderson, Researcher About Pew Research Center Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world.
    [Show full text]