DOCSLIB.ORG

Pacific Region Integrated Fisheries Management Plan : Red Sea Urchin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pacific Region Integrated Fisheries Management Plan : Red Sea Urchin PACIFIC REGION INTEGRATED FISHERIES MANAGEMENT PLAN RED SEA URCHIN AUGUST 1, 2019 TO JULY 31, 2020 Red Sea Urchin: Mesocentrotus franciscanus This Integrated Fisheries Management Plan is intended for general purposes only. Where there is a discrepancy between the Plan and the Fisheries Act and Regulations, the Act and Regulations are the final authority. A description of Areas and Subareas referenced in this Plan can be found in the Pacific Fishery Management Area Regulations. FOREWORD The purpose of this Integrated Fisheries Management Plan (IFMP) is to identify the main objectives and requirements for the Red Sea Urchin fishery in the Pacific Region, as well as the management measures that will be used to achieve these objectives. This document also serves to communicate the basic information on the fishery and its management to Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) staff, legislated co-management boards, and other stakeholders. This IFMP provides a common understanding of the basic “rules” for the sustainable management of the fisheries resource. This IFMP is not a legally binding instrument which can form the basis of a legal challenge. The IFMP can be modified at any time and does not fetter the Minister's discretionary powers set out in the Fisheries Act. The Minister can, for reasons of conservation or for any other valid reasons, modify any provision of the IFMP in accordance with the powers granted pursuant to the Fisheries Act. Where DFO is responsible for implementing obligations under land claims agreements, the IFMP will be implemented in a manner consistent with these obligations. In the event that an IFMP is inconsistent with obligations under land claims agreements, the provisions of the land claims agreements will prevail to the extent of the inconsistency. 2019/20 Red Sea Urchin Integrated Fisheries Management Plan Page 2 of 33 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 5 1.2. History ................................................................................................................................. 5 1.3. Type of Fishery and Participants ......................................................................................... 5 1.4. Location of Fishery.............................................................................................................. 6 1.5. Fishery Characteristics ........................................................................................................ 6 1.6. Governance .......................................................................................................................... 7 1.7. Approval Process ................................................................................................................. 8 2. STOCK ASSESSMENT, SCIENCE AND TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE ................................ 8 2.1. Biological Synopsis ............................................................................................................. 8 2.2. Ecosystem Interactions ........................................................................................................ 9 2.3. Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge/Traditional Ecological Knowledge ............................. 9 2.4. Stock Assessment ................................................................................................................ 9 2.5. Stock Scenarios ................................................................................................................... 9 2.6. Precautionary Approach .................................................................................................... 10 2.7. Research ............................................................................................................................ 11 3. ECONOMIC PROFILE OF THE FISHERY ................................................................................. 11 3.1. First Nations ...................................................................................................................... 11 3.2. Recreational ....................................................................................................................... 12 3.3. Commercial ....................................................................................................................... 12 4. MANAGEMENT ISSUES ............................................................................................................. 16 4.1. Conservation and Sustainability ........................................................................................ 16 4.2. Social, Cultural and Economic .......................................................................................... 17 4.3. Compliance ........................................................................................................................ 17 4.4. Ecosystem .......................................................................................................................... 18 4.5. Oceans Management ......................................................................................................... 18 4.6. Gear Impacts ...................................................................................................................... 22 5. OBJECTIVES................................................................................................................................. 23 5.1. National ............................................................................................................................. 23 5.2. Pacific Region ................................................................................................................... 23 5.3. Invertebrate Resource Management .................................................................................. 23 5.4. Red Sea Urchin .................................................................................................................. 24 6. ACCESS AND ALLOCATION ..................................................................................................... 25 6.1. First Nations ...................................................................................................................... 25 6.2. Recreational ....................................................................................................................... 25 6.3. Commercial ....................................................................................................................... 25 6.4. Experimental, Scientific, Educational or Public Display .................................................. 26 6.5. Request for Access ............................................................................................................ 26 7. MANAGEMENT MEASURES FOR THE DURATION OF THE PLAN ................................... 26 8. SHARED STEWARDSHIP ARRANGEMENTS ......................................................................... 26 8.1. Commercial Fishery .......................................................................................................... 26 8.2. Fisheries and Oceans Canada ............................................................................................ 26 9. COMPLIANCE PLAN ................................................................................................................... 26 9.1. Enforcement Issues and Strategies .................................................................................... 27 10. PERFORMANCE REVIEW .......................................................................................................... 28 10.1. Stock Assessment and Research ........................................................................................ 28 2019/20 Red Sea Urchin Integrated Fisheries Management Plan Page 3 of 33 10.2. First Nations Fishery ......................................................................................................... 28 10.3. Recreational Fishery .......................................................................................................... 28 10.4. Commercial Fishery .......................................................................................................... 29 10.5. Compliance ........................................................................................................................ 29 11. REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................... 29 12. GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................... 30 ATTACHMENTS Appendix 1: Red Sea Urchin Commercial Harvest Plan Appendix 2: Red Sea Urchin First Nations Harvest Plan Appendix 3: Red Sea Urchin Recreational Harvest Plan Appendix 4: Red Sea Urchin Aquaculture Management Measures Appendix 5: Post Season Review Appendix 6: Management Measures for the Commercial Fishery Appendix 7: Information on Estimating Total Allowable Catch Appendix 8: Size Limit Appendix 9: Example of a Red Sea Urchin Harvest Log Appendix 10: Red Sea Urchin Quota Area Descriptions Appendix 11: Example of Red Sea Urchin Conditions of Licence Appendix 12: Fishing Vessel Safety Appendix 13: Consultation Appendix 14: Contacts Appendix 15: Map of Gwaii Haanas Closures
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gitxaała Use and Occupancy in the Area of the Proposed Northern Gateway Pipeline Tanker Routes
    Gitxaała Use and Occupancy in the area of the proposed Northern Gateway Pipeline Tanker Routes Prepared on behalf of Gitxaała Nation Charles R. Menzies, PhD December 18, 2011 Table of Contents Gitxaała Use and Occupancy in the area of the proposed Northern Gateway Pipeline Tanker Routes......................................................................................................... 0 1. Qualifications.................................................................................................................................2 2. Major sources of knowledge with respect to Gitxaała .....................................................3 3. The transmission of Gitxaala oral history, culture, language and knowledge ........6 3.1 Basis of evidence......................................................................................................................................6 3.2 Oral history and the transmission of narratives ........................................................................7 4. An overview of the early history of contact between Europeans and the Gitxaała. .............................................................................................................................................................. 10 5. An Ethnographic Description of Gitxaała.......................................................................... 11 5.1 Gitxaała Language ................................................................................................................................ 11 5.2 Social organization
    [Show full text]
  • The Gray Wolves of British Columbia's Coastal Rainforests
    The Gray Wolves (Canis lupus) of British Columbia’s Coastal Rainforests ● Findings from Year 2000 Pilot Study ● Conservation Assessment Chris T. Darimont and Paul C. Paquet Suggested Citation Darimont, C.T., and P.C. Paquet. 2000. The Gray Wolves (Canis lupus) of British Columbia’s Coastal Rainforests: Findings from Year 2000 Pilot Study and Conservation Assessment. Prepared for the Raincoast Conservation Society. Victoria, BC. 62 pp. About the Authors Chris Darimont Chris has a BSc. in Biology and Environmental Studies from the University of Victoria. A professional biologist, he has studied other elusive wildlife species including Marbled Murrelets, Canada Lynx, and Northern Goshawks. Paul first introduced Chris to wolf research in 1998 when Chris worked for the Central Rockies Wolf Project. Chris plans to continue coastal wolf research as a graduate student. He operates Darimont Environmental. Paul Paquet Dr. Paul Paquet is an internationally recognized authority on mammalian carnivores, especially wolves, with research experience in several regions of the world. He worked as a biologist for the Canadian Wildlife Service for many years. Now, he is Senior Ecologist with Conservation Science, Inc., an international consultant and lecturer, and Director of the Central Rockies Wolf Project. Paul is a longtime fellow of World Wildlife Fund Canada and was the architect of the World Wide Fund for Nature’s Large Carnivore Initiative for Europe. He is an Adjunct Associate Professor of Environmental Design at the University of Calgary, where he supervises graduate student research. He is also an Adjunct Professor at Brandon University, Manitoba and Faculty Associate at Guelph University, Ontario. He previously held academic appointments at University of Alberta in the Department of Biology and at University of Montana in the School of Forestry.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Analysis Report Recreation
    Resource Analysis Report Recreation Prepared by Denise Stoffels for the North Coast Government Technical Team Updated by Denise Stoffels - Van Raalte March 2003 Executive Summary Recreation is any outdoor or leisure activity where the participant does not pay a commercial operator for the privilege of partaking in the activity. Popular recreation activities in the North Coast plan area include kayaking, fishing, hunting, boating, snowmobiling, hiking and wildlife viewing. Many of the activities are marine based. There is limited road access within the plan area with the exception of the Highway 16 corridor. The existing recreation database represents sites that currently receive use, rather than all of the potential recreation sites within the plan area. The database, and this report, were updated in 2002 (2003), based on public input received at a series of open houses and on the professional knowledge of the Recreation Office at the North Coast Forest District, Ministry of Forests1. As more information becomes available, this inventory may require further updating. Specific site locations and use levels related to First Nations subsistence activities such as hunting and berry picking are not included in the database, as it was felt that this would more aptly be presented as traditional use and not recreational use. The data was analysed based on user day categories. Based on anecdotal information, user day categories were assigned to each site location. The general trend was that sites in and around Prince Rupert and the Skeena River corridor received higher levels of use, while sites that were further away received less use. Some sites where level of use was high included Bishop Bay, Lucy Island and the Skeena River mud flats.
    [Show full text]
  • NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS FINWC-122
    NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS FINWC-122 A Listing oi pacific coast JfD"ri Spawnins Streams and Hatcheries producing Chinook and Coho Salmon with Estimates on Numbers of Spawners and Data on Hatchery Releases by Roy J. Wahle and Rager E . Parson September 1987 US. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Ocrranic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service This TM series is uoed for documentation and timly communication of plhinery resul.rs, interh reports, or s cia1 purpase Information, and has nM received mmpbb fomi review, editorial conrol, or detailed editing. A LISTING OF PACIFIC COAST SPAWNING STREAMS AND HATCHERIES PRODUCING CHINOOK AND COHO SALMON with Estimates on Numbers of Spawners and Data on Hatchery Releases Roy J. Wahleu and Roger E. pearsonu UPacific Marine Fisheries Commission 2000 S.W. First Avenue Metro Center, Suite 170 Port1and, OR 97201-5346 Present address: 8721 N.E. Bl ackburn Road Yamhill, OR 97148 2/(CO-author deceased ) Northwest and Alaska Fisheries Center National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Admini stration 2725 Montl ake Boulevard East Seattle, WA 98112 September 1987 This document is available to the public through: National Technical Information Service U.S. Department of Commerce 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 iii ABSTRACT Information on chinook, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, and coho, -0. kisutch, salmon spawning streams and hatcheries along the west coast of North Ameriica was compiled following extensive consultations with fishery managers and biologists and thorough review of pub1 ished and unpublished information. Included are a listing of all spawning streams known as of 1984-85, estimates of the annual number of spawners observed in the streams, and data on the annual production of juveni le chinook and coho salmon at a1 1 hatcheries.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Monitoring Project
    Coastal Monitoring Project Report for the 2008 Pilot Field Season February 2009 Prepared by: Aaron Hill – Raincoast Conservation Foundation, PO Box 2429, Sidney, BC, V8L 3Y3 Chris R. Picard – Gitga’at First Nation, 445 Hayimiisaxaa Way, Hartley Bay, BC, V0V 1A0 1 Summary The Raincoast-Gitga’at Coastal Monitoring Project (CMP) was launched in July 2008 with the assistance of the Headwaters Initiative Project in response to potential oil and condensate tanker traffic on BC’s North Coast,. Tanker traffic poses a great threat to this coastal ecosystem and the indigenous cultures and resource economies that it supports. The primary objectives of the CMP are: (1) to build on the current First Nation and ENGO presence in the portions of Gitga’at territory that would receive this tanker traffic, and (2) to collect baseline ecological data on components of the coastal ecosystem with high cultural and ecological value that would be most impacted by chronic oiling and catastrophic oil spills, or that would be good early indicators of hydrocarbon pollution. Field work began in August 2008 with an initial reconnaissance trip by the two project coordinators, and progressed in earnest starting on Sept. 1, when the 3-person field crew, including 2 technicians from Hartley Bay, set up the first camp in Cameron Cove on Princess Royal Island. A total of 23 field days were spent working from this site, another camp on the Anderson Islands, and from Hartley Bay. During this time, the field crew: • Inspected 24 small streams to record fish presence and habitat characteristics, finding adult and/or juvenile salmon in 10 streams; • Conducted 9 beached bird surveys at 6 individual beaches using the Bird Studies Canada survey method; • Conducted 3 intertidal diversity photo surveys with accompanying beach seines for marine fish presence and diversity; • Collected mussels along 7 transects throughout Gitga’at territory for baseline hydrocarbon toxicology and hydrocarbon ‘fingerprinting’ • Recorded 35 cetacean sightings using BC Cetacean Sightings Network criteria, and photo referencing.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Region
    PACIFIC REGION 1999/2000 MANAGEMENT PLAN RED SEA URCHIN This Red Sea Urchin Management Plan is intended for general purposes only. Where there is a discrepancy between the Plan and the regulations, the regulations are the final authority. A description of Areas and Subareas referenced in this Plan can be found in the Pacific Fishery Management Area Regulations. These are available through the Internet at: http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/communic/policy/dnload_e.htm RECORD OF MANAGEMENT PLAN REVISIONS Plan: 1999/2000 Red Sea Urchin Plan Date last revised: 01 June 1999 Version Number: 1 # Date Page Subject Revision Details Contact ADDITIONAL NOTES: TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. FISHERIES AND OCEANS CANADA CONTACTS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION......2 2. SHELLFISH - GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ..........................................................................4 3. HISTORY OF THE COMMERCIAL RED SEA URCHIN FISHERY....................................4 4. ENFORCEMENT PLAN........................................................................................................6 5. ABORIGINAL FISHERIES PLAN.........................................................................................6 6. RECREATIONAL FISHING PLAN.......................................................................................6 7. DEFINITION OF TERMS FOR COMMERCIAL FISHING PLAN .......................................7 8. COMMERCIAL FISHING PLAN ..........................................................................................8 8.1. Management Changes and Highlights for 1999/2000.................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • A Morphometric Analysis of Geographic Variation Within Sorex Monticolus (Insectivora: Soricidae)
    QL 737 .156 A539 MISCELLANEOUS 1996 UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS PUBLICATION NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM No. 88 A Morphometric Analysis of Geographic Variation within Sorex monticolus (Insectivora: Soricidae) Lois F. Alexander LAWRENCE 21 February 1996 The Library "Museum of Comparative ZooK Harvard University ??6 THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS, NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM PUBLICATIONS The University of Kansas Publications, Natural History Museum, beginning with volume 1 in 1946, was discontinued with volume 20 in 1971. Shorter research papers formerly published in the above series are now published as The University of Kansas Natural History Museum Occasional Papers. The University of Kansas Natural History Museum Miscellaneous Publications began with number 1 in 1946. Longer research papers are published in that series. Monographs of the Natural History Museum were initiated in 1970. Authors should contact the managing editor regarding style and submission procedures before manuscript submission. All manuscripts are subjected to critical review by intra- and extramural specialists; final acceptance is at the discretion of the Director. This publication is printed on acid-free paper. Occasional Papers and Miscellaneous Publications are typeset using Microsoft® Word and Aldus PageMaker® on a Macintosh computer. Institutional libraries interested in exchanging publications may obtain the Occasional Papers and Miscellaneous Publications by addressing the Exchange Librarian, The University of Kansas Library, Lawrence, Kansas 66045-2800, USA. Individuals may purchase separate numbers from the Office of Publications, Natural History Museum, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045-2454, USA. The University of Kansas Natural History Museum Miscellaneous Publication No. 88 21 February 1996 A Morphometric Analysis of Geographic Variation within Sorex monticolus (Insectivora: Soricidae) Lois F.
    [Show full text]
  • SSTOA and WTA Marine Debris Removal Initiative 2020 Coastal Environmental Protection, Employment, and Economic Recovery During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    SSTOA and WTA Marine Debris Removal Initiative 2020 Coastal Environmental Protection, Employment, and Economic Recovery During the COVID-19 Pandemic Funded by The Government of British Columbia’s Clean Coast, Clean Waters Initiative Fund (CCCW) Lead Author Russell Markel On behalf of the Small Ship Tour Operators Association of BC Project Co-Leads Russell Markel and Kevin Smith Contributing Editors and Participating Organizations Wilderness Tourism Association of BC (WTA) Small Ship Tour Operators Association of BC (SSTOA) Scott Benton, Executive Director, WTA Russell Markel, Outer Shores Expeditions & SSTOA Kevin Smith and Maureen Gordon, Maple Leaf Adventures & SSTOA Eric Boyum, Ocean Adventures Charter Co. Ltd. & SSTOA Ross Campbell, Mothership Adventures & SSTOA Randy Burke, Bluewater Adventures & SSTOA Kathy MacRae, Commercial Bear Viewing Association of BC (CVBA) Supporting and Participating First Nations Heiltsuk First Nation Kitasoo/Xai’xais First Nation Gitga’at First Nation Wuikinuxv First Nation Nuxalk First Nation Citation Please cite this report as: SSTOA (2020) Marine Debris Removal Initiative 2020 – Coastal Environmental Protection, Employment, and Economic Recovery During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Submission Date December 18th, 2020 OUTER SHORES adventures INC Gitga’at Nation Heiltsuk Nation Wuikinuxv Nation Nuxalk Nation Preface As the events of the COVID-19 pandemic unfolded in the spring and early summer of 2020, and domestic and international travel and tourism came to a halt, the Small Ship Tour Operators Association of BC (SSTOA) embarked upon seeking First Nations support and Federal and Provincial government funding to conduct a large-scale marine debris removal initiative on British Columbia’s Central and North Coast. If funded, this initiative would support the financial survival of BC’s iconic small ship-based expedition travel industry, re-employ more than 100 seasonal and full-time employees, and result in substantial benefits to coastal wildlife and marine ecosystem health.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Spatial and Resource Management Implications of Cruise Ship Tourism on British Columbia's North Coast
    ASSESSING THE SPATIAL AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS OF CRUISE SHIP TOURISM ON BRITISH COLUMBIA'S NORTH COAST Rahul Edward Ray B.Sc. Simon Fraser University, 2000 DEIA Concordia University, 200 1 RESEARCH PROJECT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT in the School of Resource and Environmental Management Report No. 348 O Rahul Edward Ray 2003 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY December 2003 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. Approval Name: Rahul Edward Ray Degree: Master of Resource Management Title of Research Project: Assessing the Spatial and Resource Management Implications of Cruise Ship Tourism on British Columbia's North Coast Report No.: 348 Examining Committee: Dr. Peter W. Williams Senior Supervisor School of Resource and Environmental Management Simon Fraser University Dr. Murray Rutherford Committee Member School of Resource and Environmental management Simon Fraser University Date Approved: doc3 z00.3 Abstract This research examined the potential spatial and management implications of cruise ship passenger activity in mid and back-country regions of the North Coast of British Columbia. Research efforts included case study reviews of three prominent Alaskan cruise ports. Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping was used to display shore excursion spatial patterns, while land and resource management challenges were compiled and categorized. This information was used as a guide for examining potential development patterns on the North Coast land and resource base. Discussions with key North Coast informants, a review of current cruise ship development plans, and examination of spatial tourism data provided an understanding of regional conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gitk'a'ata, Their History, and Their Territories Report Submitted to the Gitk'a'ata January 2012 by Susan Marsden
    (A39495) THE GITK’A’ATA, THEIR HISTORY, AND THEIR TERRITORIES REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE GITK’A’ATA JANUARY 2012 BY SUSAN MARSDEN 1 (A39495) PREAMBLE I have been asked by Peter Grant and Associates on behalf of Gitk’a’ata to undertake the following: “For purposes of providing evidence to the Enbridge Northern Gateway Panel of Gitga'at title and rights, we would like you to provide an expert report. Because we are operating under severe time contraints in regard to the submission of evidence to the Panel, and because we are thus forced to focus on only those portions of Gitga'at territory where Enbridge's tankers pose the most persistent and significant threats to the Gitga'at people, we ask you to limit the geographic scope of your report to the land/marine areas along Douglas Channel beginning at Kitkiata Inlet and Hawkesbury Island (across the Channel from Kitkiata Inlet), south to the islands at the mouth of the Channel out to and including Campania Island.” The structure of the report is as follows: § in the first section after the Introduction, section 2 (2.1-2.5), I address the Gitk’a’ata in the context of the Tsimshian and other Northwest coast nations and provide an overview of theTsimshian legal system as it concerns territorial ownership, and of the role of the adawx in this system and its relevance to this report. § in section 3 (3.1-3.5) I present a summary of the history of the founding peoples of Gitk’a’ata. It is the adawx, which are each owned, told, and perpetuated by the lineage leaders, that tell the history of their lineage and together these histories tell the history of the tribe, the region, the nation and other nations.
    [Show full text]
  • EGSA Tourism Report
    Coast Information Team c/o Cortex Consultants Inc., 3A–1218 Langley St. Victoria, BC, V8W 1W2 Tel: 250-360-1492 / Fax: 250-360-1493 / Email: [email protected] May 14, 2004 The Coast Information Team is pleased to deliver the final version of the CIT Economic Gain Spatial Analysis–Tourism (May 2004). The Coast Information Team (CIT) was established to provide independent information for the central and north coasts of British Columbia and Haida Gwaii/Queen Charlotte Islands using the best available scientific, technical, traditional and local knowledge. The CIT was established by the Provincial Government of British Columbia, First Nations, environmental groups, the forest industry, and communities. It is led by a management committee consisting of representatives of these bodies; and is funded by the Provincial Government, the environmental groups and forest products companies, and the Federal Government of Canada. The technical team comprises nine project teams consisting of scientists, practitioners, and traditional and local experts. CIT information and analyses, which include this CIT Economic Gain Spatial Analysis–Tourism, are intended to assist First Nations and the three sub-regional planning processes to make decisions that will achieve ecosystem-based management (as per the April 4th 2001 Coastal First Nations— Government Protocol and the CCLRMP Interim Agreement). In keeping with the CIT’s commitment to transparency and highly credible independent analysis, the CIT Economic Gain Spatial Analysis–Tourism underwent an internal peer review and the CIT’s independent peer review process chaired by University of Victoria Professor Rod Dobell. Peer reviews of the draft document and the authors’ response are found at http://citbc.org/anaecon.html.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment Certificate Application Section 7: Assessment of Potential Social Effects
    LNG Canada Export Terminal Environmental Assessment Certificate Application Section 7: Assessment of Potential Social Effects 7.4 Marine Transportation and Use 7.4.1 Introduction Marine transportation and use is a VC because Project construction, operation, and decommissioning might conflict with existing marine uses. For example, the expansion of the terminal and the associated increase in shipping traffic could affect marine fisheries, including Aboriginal fisheries, or the ability to pursue recreational activities in the areas along the marine access route. The potential effects of the Project on marine navigation, existing shipping, and human use of the marine environment within the navigable waters along the Project's marine access route (Figure 7.4-1) are assessed. Potential effects on fish and fish habitat and on marine mammals are assessed in Section 5.8, and potential effects on visual quality are assessed in Section 7.3. The potential for Project-related accidents to affect marine transportation and use is discussed in Section 10. 7.4.2 Scope of Assessment 7.4.2.1 Regulatory and Policy Setting Acts and regulations concerning commercial shipping and construction activities in navigable waters include: . Navigation Protection Act . Canada Shipping Act, 2001 . Canadian Ballast Water Control and Management Regulations . Transportation of Dangerous Goods Act and Regulations, and . Canada Marine Act. The Navigation Protection Act (NPA) protects the public’s right to navigate and regulates the construction of works that might affect this right. The NPA is administered by Transport Canada and applies to scheduled waterways in Canada. Transport Canada will only authorize major works upon satisfactory review of the final design and development plan for the works.
    [Show full text]