DOCSLIB.ORG

Monitoring of Journalistic Self-Regulatory Bodies in Montenegro Bodies Self-Regulatory Journalistic of Monitoring

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2014 2012 MONITORING OF JOURNALISTIC SELF-REGULATORY BODIES IN MONTENEGRO september september 2012 MONITORING OF JOURNALISTIC SELF-REGULATORY BODIES IN MONTENEGRO 2014 september 2014 2012 MONITORING OF JOURNALISTIC SELF-REGULATORY BODIES IN MONTENEGRO MONITORING OF JOURNALISTIC SELF-REGULATORY BODIES IN MONTENEGRO September 2012 – September 2014 Podgorica 2015 Publisher Human Rights Action Slobode 74/II, 81 000 Podgorica, Montenegro Tel: +382 20 232 348 Fax: +382 20 232 122 www.hraction.org For the Publisher Tea Gorjanc Prelević Authors Dragoljub Duško Vuković / in relation to print media and web portals Marijana Buljan / in relation to TV news programmes Editors Tea Gorjanc Prelević Mirjana Radović Translation into English Ana Tonić Slobodan Dumnić Marija Lazarević Graphic design Ana Matić This project was funded by the Government of the United Kingdom through the British Embassy in Podgorica. Opinions presented in this publication represent exclusively views of the authors and do not necessarily correspond to the views of the donor. MONITORING OF JOURNALISTIC SELF-REGULATORY BODIES IN MONTENEGRO September 2012 – September 2014 Dragoljub Duško Vuković / Marijana Buljan Podgorica 2015 MONITORING OF JOURNALISTIC SELF-REGULATORY BODIES IN MONTENEGRO 15 PREFACE 19 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 19 On self-regulation in the media in Montenegro 21 Media Council for Self-Regulation 21 Conclusions 24 Recommendations 26 Self-Regulatory Local Press Council 26 Conclusions 26 Recommendations 26 Ombudsman/Ombudswoman of TV Vijesti 26 Conclusions 27 Recommendations 27 Ombudsman/Ombudswoman of daily Vijesti 27 Conclusions 28 Recommendations 28 Ombudsman/Ombudswoman of daily Dan 28 Conclusions 28 Recommendations 28 Ombudsman/Ombudswoman of weekly Monitor 28 Conclusion and recommendation 29 RECOMMENDATIONS RELATING TO SELF-REGULATION IN THE MEDIA IN MONTENEGRO 31 GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS RELATING TO ALL MEDIA 32 PROPOSALS FOR REVISION OF THE CODE OF MONTENEGRIN JOURNALISTS 35 THE FIRST REPORT (September 2012 – March 2013) 37 1. HISTORY OF JOURNALISTC SELF-REGULATION IN MONTENEGRO 39 2. RESTORATION OF SELF-REGULATION 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS 41 3. DESCRIPTION AND ACTIVITIES OF NEWLY ESTABLISHED SELF-REGULATORY BODIES 41 3.1. Form of organization and membership 42 3.2. Organizational structure 44 3.3. Aims 44 3.4. Competences 46 3.5. Models of self-regulation 48 3.6. Transparency 50 3.7. Funding methods 52 4. RESULTS OF OPERATION OF JOURNALISTIC SELF-REGULATORY BODIES 52 4.1. Reports of journalistic self-regulatory bodies 52 4.1.1. Frequency of reporting 53 4.1.2. Number of recorded violations of the Code 55 4.1.3. Identifying violations of the law 57 4.1.4. Most frequent violations of the Code according to reports of self-regulatory bodies 57 4.1.5. Violations of the Code by electronic media 58 4.1.6. Violations of the Code by web portals 59 4.1.7. Distinction between hate speech and offensive speech 61 5. COMPARATIVE MONITORING AND ANALYSIS BY HUMAN RIGHTS ACTION 61 5.1. Principle 1 of the Code: selective approach to facts, one-sidedness 65 5.2. Principle 2 of the Code: critical attitude toward individuals in power 66 5.3. Principle 3 of the Code: news and comments not separated 67 5.4. Principle 4 of the Code: correction, denial, avoidance of apology 68 5.5. Principle 5 of the Code: issues of ethnicity and nationality 69 5.6. Principle 6 of the Code: unethical gathering of information 70 5.7. Principle 7 of the Code: protection of sources 70 5.8. Principle 8 of the Code: protection of privacy 72 5.9. Principle 9 of the Code: disclosure of identity of juveniles, who are perpetrators or victims of crimes 72 5.10. Principle 10 of the Code: violation of the presumption of innocence 77 5.11. Principle 11 of the Code: accepting privileges 77 5.12. Principle 12 of the Code: journalistic solidarity and plagiarism 81 THE SECOND REPORT (March 2013 – October 2013) 83 1. CURRENT SITUATION OF MEDIA SELF-REGULATION 83 1.1. General overview 84 1.1.1. Conclusions and recommendations 6 MONITORING OF JOURNALISTIC SELF-REGULATORY BODIES IN MONTENEGRO 85 1.2. Activities of Media Council for Self-Regulation (MCSR) 86 1.2.1. Conclusions and recommendations 88 1.3. Activities of TV Vijesti Ombudsman 88 1.4. Activities of the Self-Regulatory Local Press Council 89 2. RESULTS OF OPERATION OF SELF-REGULATORY BODIES 89 2.1. Results of operation of MCSR 89 2.1.1. Dealing with complaints about content published in the media 91 2.1.2. Findings of the MCSR Monitoring team 91 2.1.3. HRA analysis of MCSR conduct 95 2.1.4. Conclusions and recommendations 96 2.2. Results of operation of TV Vijesti Ombudsman 96 2.2.1. Dealing with complaints of viewers 97 2.2.2. Self-initiated conduct of the Ombudsman 97 2.2.3. HRA analysis 98 2.2.4. Conclusions and recommendations 99 3. COMPARATIVE MONITORING AND ANALYSIS BY HUMAN RIGHTS ACTION 99 3.1. Principle 1 of the Code: selective approach to facts, one-sidedness 99 3.1.1. Violations of Principle 1 in print and online media 104 3.1.2. Violations of Principle 1 in TV programmes 107 3.2. Principle 2 of the Code: critical attitude toward individuals in power 107 3.2.1. Violations of the Principle 2 107 3.3. Principle 3 of the Code: news and comments not separated 107 3.3.1. Violations of Principle 3 in print and online media 110 3.3.2. Violations of Principle 3 by TV programmes 113 3.4. Principle 4 of the Code: correction, denial, apology 114 3.4.1. Violations of Principle 4 in print and online media 114 3.4.2. Violations of Principle 4 by TV programmes 115 3.5. Principle 5 of the Code: issues of ethnicity and nationality 115 3.5.1. Violations of Principle 5 in print and online media 117 3.5.2. Violations of Principle 5 by TV programmmes 118 3.6. Principle 6 of the Code: unethical gathering of information 118 3.6.1. Violations of Principle 6 in print and online media 120 3.6.2. Violations of Principle 6 by TV programmmes 120 3.7. Principle 7 of the Code: protection of sources 120 3.7.1. Violations of Principle 7 in print and online media 122 3.7.2. Violations of Principle 7 by TV programmmes 122 3.8. Principle 8 of the Code: protection of privacy 122 3.8.1. Violations of Principle 8 in print and online media 124 3.8.2. Violations of Principle 8 by TV programmmes 125 3.9. Principle 9 of the Code: disclosure of identity of juveniles, who are perpetrators or victims of crimes 125 3.9.1. Violations of Principle 9 in print and online media 7 TABLE OF CONTENTS 126 3.9.2. Violations of Principle 9 in TV programmmes 126 3.10. Principle 10 of the Code: violation of the presumption of innocence 127 3.10.1. Violations of Principle 10 in print and online media 128 3.10.2. Violations of Principle 10 in TV programmmes 129 3.11. Principle 11 of the Code: accepting privileges 129 3.11.1. Violations of Principle 11 in print and online media 130 3.11.2. Violations of Principle 11 in TV programmmes 133 3.12. Principle 12 of the Code: journalistic solidarity and plagiarism 133 3.12.1. Violations of Principle 12 in print and online media 134 3.12.2. Violations of Principle 12 in TV programmmes 135 3.13. Conclusions and recommendations 136 4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE REPORT 141 THE THIRD REPORT (1 October 2013 – 1 March 2014) 143 1. CURRENT SITUATION OF MEDIA SELF-REGULATION 143 1.1. General overview 145 1.1.1 .Conclusions and recommendations: 147 2. ACTIVITIES AND RESULTS OF OPERATION OF SELF-REGULATORY BODIES 147 2.1. Activities of Media Council for Self-Regulation (MCSR) 147 2.1.1. General information 148 2.1.2. Results of operation of MCSR Monitoring Team 148 2.1.2.1. Acting on complaints regarding content published in the media 149 2.1.2.2. Findings of MCSR Monitoring Team 150 2.1.3. HRA analysis of MCSR Monitoring Team conduct 150 2.1.3.1. HRA analysis of MCSR MT acting on complaints 153 2.1.3.2. HRA analysis of MCSR MT conduct based on its monitoring 157 2.1.4. Conclusions and recommendations 159 2.2. Activities of the Self-Regulatory Local Press Council (SLPC) 159 2.2.1. General information 160 2.2.2 Results of SLPC operation 160 2.2.3. HRA analysis of SLPC activities 161 2.2.4. Conclusions and recommendations 161 2.3. Activities of TV Vijesti Ombudsman 161 2.3.1. General information 162 2.3.2. Results of TV Vijesti Ombudsman’s work 162 2.3.3. HRA analysis of the activities of TV Vijesti Ombudsman 163 2.3.4. Conclusions and recommendations 8 MONITORING OF JOURNALISTIC SELF-REGULATORY BODIES IN MONTENEGRO 163 2.4. Activities of TV Vijesti Ombudsman 163 2.4.1. General information 164 2.4.2. Results of daily Vijesti Ombudsman’s work 165 2.4.3. HRA analysis of decisions of the TV Vijesti Ombudsman 167 2.4.4. Conclusions and recommendations 169 3. HRA COMPARATIVE MONITORING AND ANALYSIS 169 3.1. Principle 1 of the Code 169 3.1.1. Violations of Principle 1 in print and online media 175 3.1.2. Violations of Principle 1 in TV programmes 180 3.2. Principle 2 of the Code 180 3.2.1. Violations of Principle 2 in print and online media 181 3.2.2. Violations of Principle 2 in TV programmes 181 3.3.
Recommended publications
  • Menadžment Plan Istorijskog Jezgra Cetinja

    Menadžment Plan Istorijskog Jezgra Cetinja

    MENADŽMENT PLAN ISTORIJSKOG JEZGRA CETINJA VLADA CRNE GORE MINISTARSTVO KULTURE, SPORTA I MEDIJA MENADŽMENT PLAN ISTORIJSKOG JEZGRA CETINJA PODGORICA MAJ, 2009. GODINA Izvodi iz Ugovornih obaveza Ovaj Plan je urađen uz finansijsku pomoć UNESCO kancelarije u Veneciji - Regionalna kancelarija za nauku i kulturu u Evropi (UNESCO – BRESCE) i Ministarstva spoljnih poslova Italije – Cooperazione Italiana Upotrebljeni nazivi i prezentacija materijala u ovom tekstu ne podrazumijevaju ni na koji način izražavanje mišljenja Sekretarijata UNESCO u pogledu pravnog statusa bilo koje zemlje ili teritorije, grada ili područja ni njihovih nadležnosti, niti određivanja granica. Autor(i) su odgovorni za izbor i prezentaciju činjenica sadržanih u tekstu i u njemu izraženih mišljenja, koja ne odražavaju nužno i stavove UNESCO niti su za njega obavezujući. VLADA CRNE GORE MINISTARSTVO KULTURE, SPORTA I MEDIJA MENADŽMENT PLAN ISTORIJSKOG JEZGRA CETINJA PODGORICA MAJ, 2009. GODINA 1. SAžETAK 2. UVOD 2.1. Status Istorijskog jezgra Cetinja 2.2. Granice Istorijskog jezgra Cetinja 2.3. Granice zaštićene okoline (bafer zona) Istorijskog jezgra Cetinja 2.4. Značaj Istorijskog jezgra Cetinja 2.5. Integritet i autentičnost Istorijskog jezgra Cetinja 2.6. Stranci na Cetinju i o Cetinju 3. MENADžMENT PLAN ISTORIJSKOG JEZGRA CETINJA 3.1. Cilj Menadžment plana 3.2. Potreba za izradom Menadžment plana 3.3. Status Plana 3.4. Osnov za izradu i donošenje Plana 3.5. Proces izrade Menadžment plana 4. ISTORIJSKI RAZVOJ I NAčIN žIVOTA ISTORIJSKOG JEZGRA CETINJA 4.1. Istorijski razvoj 41.1. Nastanak Cetinja 4.1.2. Vrijeme Crnojevića 4-1.3. Cetinje u doba Mitropolita 4.1.4 Period dinastije Petrovića 4.1.5. Cetinje u Kraljevini Srba Hrvata i Slovenaca / Jugoslavija 4.1.6.
  • Izvještaj O Medijskom Predstavljanju Za Predsjedničke Izbore 2018

    Izvještaj O Medijskom Predstavljanju Za Predsjedničke Izbore 2018

    Crna Gora AGENCIJA ZA ELEKTRONSKE MEDIJE Broj: 02 – 929 Podgorica, 23.04.2018.godine IZVJEŠTAJ O MEDIJSKOM PREDSTAVLJANJU TOKOM KAMPANJE ZA IZBORE ZA PREDSJEDNIKA CRNE GORE ODRŽANE 15. APRILA 2018. GODINE Zakonski okvir Zakon o izboru odbornika i poslanika1, u okviru Poglavlja VII Predstavljanje podnosilaca izbornih lista i kandidata sa izbornih lista (čl. 50 - 64b.), reguliše prava i obaveze elektronskih i štampanih medija u toku predizborne kampanje. Predstavljanje kandidata posredstvom javnih emitera, u skladu sa ovim zakonom, vrši se na osnovu pravila koja donosi nadležni organ javnog emitera, odnosno komercijalnog i neprofitnog emitera. Pravila se moraju donijeti i učiniti dostupnim javnosti u roku od najkasnije 10 dana od dana raspisivanja izbora. Pravo na medijsko praćenje u predizbornoj kampanji počinje od dana potvrđivanja izborne liste učesnika predizborne kampanje i prestaje 24 časa prije dana održavanja izbora. Zakon propisuje da se od dana potvrđivanja izborne liste, odnosno kandidature, stiče pravo da se posredstvom nacionalnog javnog emitera Radio Televizija Crne Gore, kao i posredstvom regionalnih i lokalnih javnih emitera, u okviru istih dnevnih termina, odnosno rubrika, svakodnevno, u jednakom trajanju i besplatno obavještavaju građani o kandidatima, programima i aktivnostima. Radio Televizija Crne Gore, regionalni i lokalni javni emiteri obavezni su da, u vrijeme izborne kampanje, u blokovima komercijalnog marketinga, svakodnevno, u jednakom trajanju i u istom terminu, obezbijede besplatno i ravnopravno objavljivanje najava svih promotivnih skupova podnosilaca izbornih lista. Takođe, javni emiteri su obavezni da u blokovima komercijalnog marketinga obezbijede emitovanje: - političko-propagandnih TV-klipova, odnosno audio-klipova, u obimu ne manjem od 200 sekundi dnevno, zavisno od planiranog broja reklamnih blokova političkog marketinga; - trominutnih izvještaja sa promotivnog skupa, dva puta dnevno, u terminima odmah nakon centralnih večernjih informativnih emisija televizije i radija.
  • The Impact of Prize Money on Marathon Performance and Acclaim

    The Impact of Prize Money on Marathon Performance and Acclaim

    THE IMPACT OF PRIZE MONEY ON MARATHON PERFORMANCE AND ACCLAIM A THESIS Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Economics and Business The Colorado College In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Bachelor of Arts By Colbert Heathcott March 2015 THE IMPACT OF PRIZE MONEY ON MARATHON PERFORMANCE AND ACCLAIM Colbert Heathcott March 2015 Economics Abstract In the past century, marathon running has become a major phenomenon in society. As a result, race participation and frequency have increased in the United States over the past decade. With the increased growth of the sport, the amount of money and the overall economic impact of races have risen, causing event organizers and sponsors to face decisions involving race awards and funding. Using an OLS regression model, this study examines the impact of prize money on marathon performance and acclaim. Results reveal marathon running to be exempt from incentive theory, as athletes do not perform better as a result of increases in winning prize money. Prize money also has no significant impact on the popularity of marathon events. Other factors, such as marathon location and history, significantly affect the acclaim of a marathon event. A thorough understanding on the impact of prize money is necessary for the future of the growing sport of marathon running. KEYWORDS: (Marathon, Incentive, Sports Marketing) ON MY HONOR, I HAVE NEITHER GIVEN NOR RECEIVED UNAUTHORIZED AID ON THIS THESIS Colbert Heathcott Signature Acknowledgments I would like to thank Dr. Judy Laux for advising me throughout the process of this research. I would also like to thank Will Richmond for Monday dinners, morning laps in the pool, and forcing me to go to the library.
  • Dzhokhar Tsarnaev Had Murdered Krystle Marie Campbell, Lingzi Lu, Martin Richard, and Officer Sean Collier, He Was Here in This Courthouse

    Dzhokhar Tsarnaev Had Murdered Krystle Marie Campbell, Lingzi Lu, Martin Richard, and Officer Sean Collier, He Was Here in This Courthouse

    United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 16-6001 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. DZHOKHAR A. TSARNAEV, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. George A. O'Toole, Jr., U.S. District Judge] Before Torruella, Thompson, and Kayatta, Circuit Judges. Daniel Habib, with whom Deirdre D. von Dornum, David Patton, Mia Eisner-Grynberg, Anthony O'Rourke, Federal Defenders of New York, Inc., Clifford Gardner, Law Offices of Cliff Gardner, Gail K. Johnson, and Johnson & Klein, PLLC were on brief, for appellant. John Remington Graham on brief for James Feltzer, Ph.D., Mary Maxwell, Ph.D., LL.B., and Cesar Baruja, M.D., amici curiae. George H. Kendall, Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, Timothy P. O'Toole, and Miller & Chevalier on brief for Eight Distinguished Local Citizens, amici curiae. David A. Ruhnke, Ruhnke & Barrett, Megan Wall-Wolff, Wall- Wolff LLC, Michael J. Iacopino, Brennan Lenehan Iacopino & Hickey, Benjamin Silverman, and Law Office of Benjamin Silverman PLLC on brief for National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, amicus curiae. William A. Glaser, Attorney, Appellate Section, Criminal Division, U.S. Department of Justice, with whom Andrew E. Lelling, United States Attorney, Nadine Pellegrini, Assistant United States Attorney, John C. Demers, Assistant Attorney General, National Security Division, John F. Palmer, Attorney, National Security Division, Brian A. Benczkowski, Assistant Attorney General, and Matthew S. Miner, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, were on brief, for appellee. July 31, 2020 THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. OVERVIEW Together with his older brother Tamerlan, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev detonated two homemade bombs at the 2013 Boston Marathon, thus committing one of the worst domestic terrorist attacks since the 9/11 atrocities.1 Radical jihadists bent on killing Americans, the duo caused battlefield-like carnage.
  • Trabajo De Titulación..Pdf

    Trabajo De Titulación..Pdf

    UNIVERSIDAD DE CUENCA FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS ECONÓMICAS Y ADMINISTRATIVAS CARRERA DE INGENIERÍA EN MARKETING Impacto del Visual Merchandising en recordación de marca y preferencia de compra entre marcas de calzado deportivo para la tienda Marathon Sports ubicada en el Mall del Río en la ciudad de Cuenca, año 2017 Trabajo de titulación previo a la obtención del título de Ingeniera en Marketing, Modalidad: “Artículo Académico”. AUTORAS: ANA LIZ CORDERO MALDONADO 0106445372 TANIA CAROLINA CORDERO GARZÓN 0105756399 TUTOR: ING. JUAN FERNANDO CASTILLO SERRANO 0103885630 CUENCA - ECUADOR 2018 UNIVERSIDAD DE CUENCA Resumen El presente trabajo investigativo tiene como objetivo conocer el impacto que tiene el visual merchandising en la recordación de marcas aplicadas en la tienda Marathon Sports, por ende, conocer el TOM, por sus siglas en inglés (arriba en la mente del consumidor en una categoría) y las preferencias de compra de calzado deportivo de las marcas Adidas, Nike y Puma. Actualmente, existe una gran diversidad de marcas en calzado deportivo importados, sin embargo, el comprador puede desconocer los beneficios, que da cada una de ellas, siendo importante que el producto se muestre y organice correctamente para facilitar la decisión de compra. El merchandising es una estrategia que además de influir en el comportamiento del consumidor, también, se encarga del diseño de la tienda, decoración de escaparates, iluminación, exhibidores y ambientes. Para Santamaría (2014), la misma se concibe como el juicio subjetivo de un consumidor sobre la excelencia o superioridad del producto. En la actualidad, no se evidencian estudios enfocados en conocer, porque, se prefiere un tipo de marca de calzado deportivo, por ello, que se considera necesario investigar algunas variables dentro del proceso comercial al momento de realizar la compra, por lo que el presente trabajo está enfocado determinar la influencia del visual merchandising en la recordación de marca y preferencia de compra de ciertas marcas reconocidas a nivel mundial.
  • Invloed Van Marketing Op City Runs - Onderzoek Op Basis Van Aantal Deelnemers

    Invloed Van Marketing Op City Runs - Onderzoek Op Basis Van Aantal Deelnemers

    UNIVERSITEIT GENT FACULTEIT GENEESKUNDE EN GEZONDHEIDSWETENSCHAPPEN ACADEMIEJAAR 2011 – 2012 Invloed van marketing op City Runs - Onderzoek op basis van aantal deelnemers Masterproef voorgelegd tot het behalen van de graad van Master in de Lichamelijke Opvoeding en de Bewegingswetenschappen. Door: Julie Vandenhouweele en Thomas Rötgens Promotor: Prof. Dr. Annick Willem en begeleidster:Steffie Lucidarme PERMISSION Ondergetekenden verklaren dat de inhoud van deze masterproef mag geraadpleegd en/of gereproduceerd worden, mits bronvermelding. Julie Vandenhouweele en Thomas Rötgens VOORWOORD Graag willen wij onze promoter Annick Willem bedanken voor de ondersteuning tijdens deze scriptieperiode. Ook onze begeleidster Steffie Lucidarme verdient lovende woorden voor haar goede voorstellen bij moeilijke stukken en voor haar terechte opmerkingen. Buiten de academische omgeving willen we de organisatoren van de loopwedstrijden bedanken, nl. Tim Rul van de Sfinx Ekiden Run, Geert Gysel van de Midzomernachtrun (Gent Loopt) en Greg Broekmans, werknemer bij Golazo Sports en organisator van de Antwerp 10 Miles & Marathon. Zonder hun steun zouden wij nooit aan voldoende respons voor onze enquêtes geraakt zijn en zou deze thesis niet tot stand gekomen zijn. Ook bedanken wij Cyril Van Tilborgh, om ons toe te laten op het sport- en citymarketing congres, waar we enkele ideeën opgedaan hebben, alsook HealthCity, Story en Topcopy om ons aan incentives voor de enquêtes te helpen. Tot slot ook een dankwoord aan onze familie en vrienden die op één of andere manier ons geholpen hebben met deze thesis. Mei 2012, Julie Vandenhouweele Thomas Rötgens SAMENVATTING Het doel van deze scriptie is om een exploratief onderzoek uit te voeren bij succesvolle loopevenementen om een kader te creëren dat aan de basis ligt van een goed loopevenement.
  • Richard's 21St Century Bicycl E 'The Best Guide to Bikes and Cycling Ever Book Published' Bike Events

    Richard's 21St Century Bicycl E 'The Best Guide to Bikes and Cycling Ever Book Published' Bike Events

    Richard's 21st Century Bicycl e 'The best guide to bikes and cycling ever Book published' Bike Events RICHARD BALLANTINE This book is dedicated to Samuel Joseph Melville, hero. First published 1975 by Pan Books This revised and updated edition first published 2000 by Pan Books an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 25 Eccleston Place, London SW1W 9NF Basingstoke and Oxford Associated companies throughout the world www.macmillan.com ISBN 0 330 37717 5 Copyright © Richard Ballantine 1975, 1989, 2000 The right of Richard Ballantine to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. • All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form, or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the prior written permission of the publisher. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. 1 3 5 7 9 8 6 4 2 A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. • Printed and bound in Great Britain by The Bath Press Ltd, Bath This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall nor, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, re-sold, hired out, or otherwise circulated without the publisher's prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser.
  • FINANCIAL REPORT for 2007

    FINANCIAL REPORT for 2007

    Republic of Montenegro BROADCASTING AGENCY Number: 02 - 413 Podgorica, 22 February 2008 FINANCIAL REPORT for 2007 Podgorica, February 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 2 FINANCIAL INDICATORS 3 I INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE PERIOD FROM 1 JAN TO 31 DEC 2007 3 INCOME OF THE AGENCY 4 EXPENDITURE OF THE AGENCY 6 II BALANCE SHEET ON 31 DECEMBER 2007 12 BROADCASTING FEE 13 TAX ON RADIO RECEIVERS IN MOTOR VEHICLES 15 FUND FOR SUPPORT OF LOCAL PUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICES 15 FUND FOR SUPPORT OF COMMERCIAL BROADCASTING SERVICES 16 III CASH FLOW BALANCE FROM 1 JANUARY TO 31 DECEMBER 2007 18 CONCLUSION 19 Broadcasting Agency 1 INTRODUCTION Provisions of the Broadcasting Law prescribe the financial activities directed to and designed as a support to the independent operation of the Broadcasting Agency. It is prescribed that the Agency acquires the funds necessary for its activities from: fees for registration of broadcasters; fees for registration of legal entities that have been granted licence for development and use of distribution systems; fees for licences for the transmission and broadcasting of radio and TV signals (hereinafter referred to as: frequency fee/income); fees for licences for the development and use of distribution systems; a part of broadcasting fee; a part of tax on radio receivers in motor vehicles; a part of income of the company for transmission and broadcasting of radio and TV signals, in compliance with the decision of the Council; other sources in compliance with the Broadcasting Law. Financial activities are public and completed through a single bank account. Funds acquired by the collection of broadcasting fee and tax on radio receivers are part of the same bank account.
  • Buyersguide Cv2011 12 Editorial Pages 07/07/2011 15:57 Page 1

    Buyersguide Cv2011 12 Editorial Pages 07/07/2011 15:57 Page 1

    buyersguide cv2011_12_Editorial Pages 07/07/2011 15:57 Page 1 BUYERS’ GUIDE 2011/12 SPORTS INSIGHT SPORTS BUYERS’ GUIDE20011/12Sportswww.sports-insight.co.uk WWW.SPORTS-INSIGHT.CO.UK PRICE £9.99 Insight MAKURASPORT.COM Reydon_Layout 1 19/07/2011 15:07 Page 1 1 - Contents_Intro page 22/07/2011 14:58 Page 3 Contents Every cloud… More takeovers will occur in the UK sports and leisurewear sector this year, if a recent industry report is to be believed. Financial analyst Plimsoll says one in five companies could change ownership as a result of too many firms chasing too little market. One of the most fragmented sectors in the UK, it appears that some businesses are facing an uncertain future. The winners will be cash rich rivals, waiting to swoop on companies put up for sale at rock bottom prices. CONTENTS A potential silver lining for the sports trade next year could be the London Olympics. One sports retailer in the capital said part of the legacy of London 2012 would be a new breed of competitors and a fresh wave of up and coming athletes for retailers to kit out and 18 Sports merchandisers 44 Sports agents support. I hope this is the case and your 25 Sports governing bodies 48 Buying groups/multiples business’ bottom line benefits as a result. 34 Trade associations 52 Suppliers A-Z listing Jeff James 36 Marketing specialists 92 Independent sports retailers 42 Association of 184 Suppliers by product Editor Professional Sales Agents category Although every care is taken to ensure that all Published by Design/Typesetting information is accurate and up to date, the publisher Maze Media (2000) Ltd, Ace Pre-Press Ltd, 19 Phoenix Court, cannot accept responsibility for mistakes or omissions.
  • The Alberta Gazette

    The Alberta Gazette

    The Alberta Gazette Part I Vol. 100 Edmonton, Wednesday, September 15, 2004 No. 17 PROCLAMATION [GREAT SEAL] CANADA PROVINCE OF ALBERTA Lois E Hole, Lieutenant Governor. ELIZABETH THE SECOND, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom, Canada, and Her Other Realms and Territories, QUEEN, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith PROCLAMATION To all Whom these Presents shall come GREETING Ken E. TJosvold, Acting Deputy Minister of Justice and Acting Deputy Attorney General WHEREAS section 79 of the Highways Development and Protection Act provides that that Act comes into force on Proclamation; and WHEREAS it is expedient to proclaim the section 72 of the Highways Development and Protection Act in force: NOW KNOW YE THAT by and with the advice and consent of Our Executive Council of Our Province of Alberta, by virtue of the provisions of the said Act hereinbefore referred to and of all other power and authority whatsoever in Us vested in that behalf, We have ordered and declared and do hereby proclaim section 72 of the Highways Development and Protection Act in force on the date of issue of this Proclamation. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF We have caused these Our Letters to be made Patent and the Great Seal of Our Province of Alberta to be hereunto affixed. WITNESS: THE HONOURABLE LOIS E. HOLE, Lieutenant Governor of Our Province of Alberta, in Our City of Edmonton in Our Province of Alberta, this 25 day of August in the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Four and in the Fifty-third Year of Our Reign.
  • Na Osnovučlana 73, Stav 1, Tačka 3 Statutaprijestonice Cetinje

    Na Osnovučlana 73, Stav 1, Tačka 3 Statutaprijestonice Cetinje

    Na osnovučlana 73, stav 1, tačka 3 StatutaPrijestonice Cetinje (“Službeni list Crne Gore- opštinskipropisi”, broj 49/18), SkupštinaPrijestonice Cetinje, nasjedniciodržanoj dana _______ 2020. godine, donijela je ODLUKU o donošenjuStrateškog plana razvojaPrijestonice Cetinje za period 2020-2024 Član 1 Donosi se Strateški plan razvojaPrijestonice Cetinje za period 2020-2024. Član 2 SastavnidiooveOdluke je Strateški plan razvojaPrijestonice Cetinje za period 2020-2024. Član 3 Ova Odluka stupa nasnaguosmog dana od dana objavljivanja u “SlužbenomlistuCrne Gore- opštinskipropisi”. Broj: ___________ Cetinje, _________ 2020. godine SKUPŠTINE PRIJESTONICE CETINJE PREDSJEDNICA MAJA ĆETKOVIĆ Obrazloženje Pravniosnov: Pravniosnov za donošenjeoveOdlukesadržan je u članu 73, stav 1, tačka 3 StatutaPrijestonice Cetinje (“Službeni list Crne Gore-opštinskipropisi”,broj 49/18), kojim je propisano da SkupštinadonosiStrateški plan razvojaPrijestonice Cetinje. Razlozi za donošenje: Razlozi za donošenjeOdluke o donošenjuStrateškog plana razvojaPrijestonice Cetinje za period 2020-2024, je usklađenostdokumentasaStrategijomregionalnograzvojaCrne Gore 2020-2024 godine. Strateškimplanomrazvojadefinisan je opšticiljkoji se odnosinaunapređenje socio- ekonomskogambijenta, očuvanjekulturnebaštine, kaootvorenijelokalnesamoupravešto je pretpostavka za daljirazvojinapredovanjegradaisprečavanjedaljedepopulacijestanovništva. Predloženiopšticilj, injemupripadajućistrateškiciljeviiprioritetiusklađenisusavizijom, ciljevimaiprioritetnimoblastimaimjeramarazvojananacionalnomnivou,
  • Departamento De Postgrados

    Departamento De Postgrados

    Departamento de Postgrados Maestría de Comunicación y Marketing Marketing Deportivo: Su efectiva gestión puede mejorar la situación económica de los clubes de fútbol Título a obtener: Master en Comunicación y Marketing Autor: Danny Lucero Arias Director: Marcelo Calle Calle Cuenca, Ecuador 2013 Lucero ii DEDICATORIA A quienes amo: Patty mi esposa, Matías, Julián y Thiago mis hijos (futuros cracks del Deportivo Cuenca). A mis padres Ignacio y Yolanda, y a mis hermanos Álvaro, Aleks y Mariuxi… a ustedes por ser el apoyo incondicional en todas las decisiones que tomo. Lucero iii AGRADECIMIENTO Expreso mis sinceros agradecimientos a los directivos de la Universidad del Azuay por permitirme cursar la maestría que me permitirá alcanzar un logro más en mi vida profesional. Al Ing. Marcelo Calle por su ayuda incondicional en la dirección del presente trabajo. De igual forma, deseo manifestar mi sentimiento de gratitud al Dr. Galo Cárdenas, al Ing. Pablo Pesántez y al Lcdo. Iván Quezada, así como a su equipo directivo, por su invaluable ayuda al permitirme formar parte de su lista candidata a la dirigencia del Club Deportivo Cuenca, ya que durante ese periodo adquirí los conocimientos y la experticia necesaria para desarrollar algunos temas que contiene el presente documento; así como, a la directiva actual del club, en especial al Ing. Juan Carlos Ortiz, por facilitarme la obtención de valiosa información inherente a la situación actual y futura de la institución. También, agradezco a las personas que me brindaron un momento de su tiempo para responder las preguntas de las entrevistas y encuestas, profesionales del mercadeo, derecho y administración vinculados a la industria del deporte, así como a los jugadores e hinchas que contribuyeron a la terminación de este estudio con sus comentarios.