Quick Guide to Steering on the Tideway
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Rotherhithe to Canary Wharf Crossing - Meeting Note
Rotherhithe to Canary Wharf Crossing - Meeting Note Title: R2CW Port of London Authority Liaison Date 05-03-19 Timing: 14:00-16:00 Type: Meeting Location: PLA Offices, Pinnacle House, London EC3 Attendees: Nick Evans (NE) PLA (River Pilot) Stephen Milford TfL (Sponsor) Tom Chick (TC) TfL (Sponsor) Marinas (Various) Aim of the meeting: To update the London marinas on project progress since the last consultation and gain insight into potential concerns. Topics of discussion: Key topics of discussion were: i. Project Update; ii. Marina concerns No. Action Owner Deadline 1 TfL to provide information on the minimum height SM 31-03-2019 over the main span 2 TfL to meet/liaise with SKD and Limehouse SM 31-03-2019 marinas with regards to bridge operation generally, as well as potential of communication between marina lock and bridge bookings specifically 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Issued 14-09-18 Page 1 of 3 Rotherhithe to Canary Wharf Crossing - Meeting Note Key outcomes (dis/agreements, notable information shared) 1. Marinas concerned about vessels being unable to make bookings 2. Marinas appreciative of concept of ‘proactive bridge operator’ 3. PLA and Marinas like idea of communication between bridge and marina lock bookings 4. Marinas expect some form of accommodation for river users awaiting a lift such as mooring buoys Ref. Description Action 1.0 Introductions/Overview 1.1 NE outlined meeting agenda and gave a brief overview of planned river traffic in 2019 – the majority of commercial traffic will be due to Tideway Tunnel construction 2.0 PLA Updates 2.1 PLA/Marinas discussed licencing – all commercial vessels on the Thames must be licensced 2.2 PLA are currently reviewing the lighting arrangements for tugs 2.3 PLA gave information about the use of arches at Blackfriars Bridge: Arches 1 and 2 are currently closed for Tideway, with a ‘traffic light’ system currently on the navigational channel that sometimes requires recreational vessels to wait. -
Teddington to Broadness Obey the COLREGS – in Particular, Your Vessel Must Display the Length Or a Rowing Boat)
PLA EBB TIDE FLAG WARNING ADVICE NAVIGATION RULES SPEED LIMITS – THAMES BYELAW 16 Wash - be aware of what your wash is doing, both to other users are berthed, please refer to Permanent Notice to Mariner for further When navigating on the tidal Thames you must ensure you proceed at a The PLA has established a warning system based on the tidal observed at Richmond You must comply with the International Regulations for Preventing and the banks and foreshore. If necessary, reduce speed. information. safe speed at all times. You must also take the prevailing wind and tidal Lock low water. The advice is updated daily at 06:00 and is readily available as an Collisions at Sea (the COLREGS) - as modified by the ‘Port of London VHF Radio - vessels over 13.7m in length must carry and use a conditions, the size and type of your vessel, your location in the river, and internet based widget on both homepages of: www.boatingonthethames.co.uk and Thames Byelaws’ - when navigating on the tidal Thames. As the person in VHF radio (see VHF requirements). HIGH SPEED CRAFT ZONES the safety of others into account. In addition a mandatory speed limit of 12 www.pla.co.uk. charge of a vessel, you must also comply with the ‘General Directions for Novices - complete a training course for your chosen activity knots applies between Margaretness and Wandsworth Bridge. See A High Speed Craft Zone exists in two areas (marked in yellow) between Navigation in the Port of London’. Copies of these publications can be before attempting to navigate the tidal Thames. -
Upper Tideway (PDF)
BASIC PRINCIPLES OF TIDEWAY NAVIGATION A chart to accompany The Tideway Code: A Code of Practice for rowing and paddling on the Tidal Thames > Upper Tideway Code Area (Special navigation rules) Col Regs (Starboard navigation rule) With the tidal stream: Against either tidal stream (working the slacks): Regardless of the tidal stream: PEED S Z H O G N ABOVE WANDSWORTH BRIDGE Outbound or Inbound stay as close to the I Outbound on the EBB – stay in the Fairway on the Starboard Use the Inshore Zone staying as close to the bank E H H High Speed for CoC vessels only E I G N Starboard (right-hand/bow side) bank as is safe and H (right-hand/bow) side as is safe and inside any navigation buoys O All other vessels 12 knot limit HS Z S P D E Inbound on the FLOOD – stay in the Fairway on the Starboard Only cross the river at the designated Crossing Zones out of the Fairway where possible. Go inside/under E piers where water levels allow and it is safe to do so (right-hand/bow) side Or at a Local Crossing if you are returning to a boat In the Fairway, do not stop in a Crossing Zone. Only boats house on the opposite bank to the Inshore Zone All small boats must inform London VTS if they waiting to cross the Fairway should stop near a crossing Chelsea are afloat below Wandsworth Bridge after dark reach CADOGAN (Hammersmith All small boats are advised to inform London PIER Crossings) BATTERSEA DOVE W AY F A I R LTU PIER VTS before navigating below Wandsworth SON ROAD BRIDGE CHELSEA FSC HAMMERSMITH KEW ‘STONE’ AKN Bridge during daylight hours BATTERSEA -
Thames Tideway Tunnel
www.WaterProjectsOnline.com Wastewater Treatment & Sewerage Thames Tideway Tunnel - Central Contract technical, logistical and operational challenges have required an innovative approach to building the Super Sewer close to some of London’s biggest landmarks by Matt Jones hames Tideway Tunnel is the largest water infrastructure project currently under construction in the UK and will modernise London’s major sewerage system, the backbone of which dates back to Victorian times. Although Tthe sewers built in the mid-19th century are still in excellent structural condition, their hydraulic capacity was designed by Sir Joseph Bazalgette for a population and associated development of 4 million people. Continued development and population growth has resulted in the capacities of the sewer system being exceeded, so that when it rains there are combined sewer overflows (CSO) to the tidal Thames performing as planned by Bazalgette. To reduce river pollution, risk to users of the river and meet bespoke dissolved oxygen standards to protect marine wildlife, discharges from these combined sewer overflows (CSOs) must be reduced. The Environment Agency has determined that building the Tideway Tunnel in combination with the already completed Lee Tunnel and improvements at five sewage treatment works would suitably control discharges, enabling compliance with the European Union’s Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive. Visualisation showing cross section through the Thames Tideway Tunnel Central Victoria CSO site – Courtesy of Tideway Project structure and programme There is also a fourth overarching systems integrator contract The Thames Tideway Tunnel closely follows the route of the river, providing the project’s monitoring and control system. Jacobs intercepting targeted CSOs that currently discharge 18Mm3 of Engineering is the overall programme manager for Tideway. -
Rotherhithe Tunnel
Rotherhithe Tunnel - Deformation Monitoring CLIENT: TFL/ TIDEWAY EAST / SIXENSE Senceive and Sixense worked together to design and implement a monitoring programme to safeguard crucial London road tunnel during construction of a nearby tunnel shaft Challenge Solution Outcome The Thames Tideway Tunnel will capture, store and move Monitoring experts at Sixense chose the Senceive FlatMesh™ Senceive provided a fully wireless and flexible monitoring almost all the untreated sewage and rainwater discharges wireless system as their monitoring solution. A total of system which could be installed quickly and easily within that currently overflow into the River Thames in central 74 high precision tilt sensor nodes were installed during the short night-time closures. The installed system was London. The Rotherhithe Tunnel sits in close proximity engineering closures over an eight-week period to monitor sufficiently robust to operate for years without maintenance to the Tideway East shaft site and there was a need to any convergence/divergence during the works. - therefore avoiding the disruption, cost and potential risks ensure that the construction work did not threaten the associated with repeated site visits. Impact on the structure integrity of the tunnel. The CVB consortium (Costain, VINCI Of these, 64 were installed directly onto the tunnel lining in and damage to the tiles was minimal as the nodes required Construction Grands Projets and Bachy Soletanche), along 16 arrays of four nodes. A further 10 nodes were mounted on just a single mounting point and minimal cabling. with Sixense as their appointed monitoring contractor, three-metre beams in a vertical shaft. The FlatMesh™ system required a monitoring system in place 12 months ahead allowed all the nodes to communicate with each other and The Senceive and Sixense teams worked together to modify of shaft construction to provide an adequate period measure sub-mm movements for an estimated project tiltmeter fixings in order to incorporate a 3D prism needed of baseline monitoring. -
Statement of Common Ground Between London Borough of Southwark and the City of London Corporation
Statement of Common Ground between London Borough of Southwark and the City of London Corporation December 2019 1 Introduction This Statement of Common Ground (SCG) addresses the strategic planning matters specific to Southwark, its neighbouring boroughs, and other strategic partner organisations. This SCG has been prepared by Southwark Council in agreement with the City of London Corporation. The purpose of the SCG is to document the strategic cross-boundary matters being addressed and progress in cooperating to address them. This SCG ensures that the requirements set out in the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) have been met. The NPPF states, “Local planning authorities and county councils (in two-tier areas) are under a duty to cooperate with each other, and with other prescribed bodies, on strategic matters that cross administrative boundaries.” Southwark Council engages with other boroughs and the City of London through regular meetings either between officers or elected members with formalised governance arrangements such as the London Councils Leaders’ Committee, Association of London Borough Planning Officers, the Cross River Partnership, the South East London Duty to Cooperate Group and the Southeast London Joint Waste Planning Group. We also maintain correspondence between planning departments on a variety of issues and projects and organise additional meetings on strategic planning matters when needed. Figure 1: Locations of Southwark and the City of London Corporation within Greater London. 2 Strategic Geography London Borough of Southwark Southwark is a densely populated and diverse inner London borough set over almost 30km of land to the south of the River Thames. Home to over 314,000 people, the borough is a patchwork of communities set over diverse 23 wards. -
Exploring London from the Thames Events & Corporate Hire Welcome to London’S Leading Riverboat Service
UNFORGETTABLE EXPERIENCES EXPLORING LONDON FROM THE THAMES EVENTS & CORPORATE HIRE WELCOME TO LONDON’S LEADING RIVERBOAT SERVICE Thank you for organising such a great event. Prosecco was flowing, great hosts and the sun even came out WELCOME for the sunset! We’re London’s leading riverboat service, providing With a choice of 18 vessels ranging from 12 to 220 our passengers a unique way to get around the capital. capacity we offer transport for sports stars and As well as catering for sightseers and commuters, rock stars to events and concerts, wedding parties, we also offer a deluxe and highly versatile corporate company functions and even a location for filming and private hire service for those wishing to explore and photoshoot. London in comfort and style. Let us show you what we can do CONTENTSEXPLORE On Board Experience 4 Catering & Hospitality 5 Branding, Corporate & Filming 6 Cruise & Excursions 7 Our Fleet 8 Rates 16 Our Route 17 Contact Details 18 4 ONBOARDLOVE EXPERIENCE IT! Thames Clippers are the fastest and most frequent fleet on the river, with 18 vessels available for private hire. Each of our catamarans are spacious, stylish and staffed by a friendly and experienced crew. For our corporate and private clients we offer seven different sizes of vessel with the option of carrying between 12 and 222 guests. The route, length and speed of journey, stop off locations, style of catering, use of facilities on board and time of travel are flexible. This means we can deliver a vast range of events; from business meetings, presentations, networking days, conferences, celebrity parties and product launches to marriage transfers and excursions for family and friends. -
Kew Shops:Then and Now
Kew Shops:then and now CAROLINE BLOMFIELD In June 2003, after selling our bookshop by Kew Gardens Station, we set up an exhibition celebrating one hundred years of shopping in Kew. The exhibition was held in a historic venue, the old workshops of Station ROYAL Avenue. They had just undergone complete renovation as a stylish studio 'So.,.Afo..,) \<;. complex, and the owners kindly lent us a large ground floor space. The ....ls exhibition was open to the public for just two days, and to our amazement we had almost 300 visitors. In view of this unexpected response, we are publishing our findings, in the hope that others may attempt something similar - and ideally even more wide-ranging - in their own communities. For most of the 20th century there were four main shopping areas in Kew: the original Kew village around the Green and along Mortlake Terrace; the full length of Sandycombe Road; the west side of the station, known today as 'The Village'; the east side of the station at the top of North Road, part of which has now been landscaped and pedestrianised as 'Kew Plaza'. (Until 1920 there was also a further small row of shops along the Lower Richmond Road, between the south ends of North Road and Dancer Road, called North Parade: these were demolished when the A316 was widened around 1930.) We decided to research these four areas and to try to establish how shops and shopping have changed in Kew, and to what extent premises that were retail businesses one hundred years ago were still operating as shops, and to what extent the goods and services demanded, and thus provided, have changed over the years. -
Map of the Kew Gardens
map image is 113.6% of photoshop master ABCDEFGH IJKLMN OPQR 1 RIVER THAMES The Gardens cover 132 ha (326 acres). Woodland Walk Elizabeth Gate to the Great Pagoda is approximately 1.6 km (1 mile). E Oak Collection OR R L S metres T P O 0 500 X P E 5 Natural Area RIVER Green Oak Shelter SIDE W ALK BRENTFORD GATE 2 Bluebells Giant Badger Sett Via Kew Green and Ferry Lane – Rhododendron Dell cars/motorbikes only Log Trail E OR R L S RER T O P S O L Minka House & T Queen’s Garden X P P O E X 4 Bamboo Garden P F E E 6 Climbers and Creepers RR Y LA 3 NE White Peaks Café Kew Palace Towpath to Kew Pier Beetle Loggery and Shop and boats Bluebells Woodland House Royal Kitchens Queen Charlotte’s Waterlily Pond Cottage E OR R 4 L S T P Herbarium, Library, Sackler Crossing O X Magnolias P E Pinetum 7 Art & Archives SY Nash Access by appointment only ON VIST Conservatory ALK Compost Heap S W CES Redwood Grove A RIN The P Orangery 5 The Great Broad Walk Borders Wollemi pine ELIZABETH A GATE Treetop Walkway Ginkgo Lane The Hive 6 AR VIST Waterlily House Kew Bridge Station 0.8 km Woodland Glade across Kew Bridge CED Holly Walk Winter Garden Secluded (South Western Rail) Rose Garden Garden Mediterranean Duke’s Garden Garden Princess of Wales Palm House Conservatory 7 Palm House Parterre The Food Village Aquatic display Kew Gardens ALK Gallery Y W Woodland CHERR Garden King William’s Rock Garden Temple A Davies Alpine Japanese Temperate House GODA VIST House Grass 8 Gateway PA The Botanical RER Temple of Garden LO S Victoria Plaza Café Kitchen Garden P T -
Impact of a Single Day Major Event on a City Arup & the Boat Race Company October 2017
The Boat Race Impact of a Single Day Major Event on a City Arup & The Boat Race Company October 2017 Executive Summary The Boat Race is an event steeped in history and tradition, with a high degree of public recognition in the UK and worldwide. Major events, of which The Boat Race is one, have undergone significant change over the last 30 years. The speed of development in equipment technology, broadcasting and spectator expectations have combined to produce events that reach far beyond their sporting origins. Through study of the economic, logistical and experiential influences on The Boat Race this document reviews the current ‘state-of-play’ for the event and makes recommendations of areas that should be considered for development in order for the event to maximise its commercial, sporting and social sustainability. Key to the future of The Boat Race is to maintain and build from its ethos of scholar athletes, elite performance, tradition and accessibility for all and to focus on how to engage with the UK and worldwide audience in order to generate income and extend the reach of the event beyond Race Day itself. The report also provides high level case studies of sporting events which have successfully managed the transition from traditional sports into highly regarded, well supported events that focus on fan experience and long term event sustainability. This document proposes that public and commercial engagement can be enhanced on various levels for The Boat Race. The report highlights the key themes for future development as digitalisation, extension of the event profile, recognition of the commercial asset, diversity of revenue streams and using the event to positively influence the sport of rowing. -
Sustainability Statement Doc Ref: 7.07 Appendix a APFP Regulations 2009: Regulation 5(2)(Q) Appendix a Sustainabilitystatement
Thames Tideway Tunnel Thames Water Utilities Limited Application for Development Consent Application Reference Number: WWO10001 Sustainability Statement Doc Ref: 7.07 Appendix A APFP Regulations 2009: Regulation 5(2)(q) Appendix A SustainabilityStatement Hard copy available in Box 48 Folder B January 2013 This page is intentionally blank Appendices Appendix A: Sustainability appraisal - Thematic A.1 Water quality National policy and legislation NPS (2012) The NPS sets the requirements for assessing the effects on water quality and resources. It states that the decision maker will generally need to give impacts on the water environment more weight where a project would have adverse effects on the achievement of the environmental objectives established under the Water Framework Directive, and that relevant River Basin Management Plans have been given due regard. Water Framework Directive (2000) The WFD was transposed to UK law in 20031. It is designed to prevent further deterioration of water quality and aquatic ecosystems, promote the sustainable use of water resources, reduce pollution from priority sources, and reduce groundwater pollution. The WFD has four objectives relevant to the project: • WFD objective 1: Prevent deterioration of the status of all bodies of surface water. • WFD objective 2: Protect, enhance and restore all bodies of surface water, with the aim of achieving good surface water status by 2015 (or 2027 where measures would take longer to implement). • WFD objective 3: Protect and enhance all artificial and heavily modified bodies of water, with the aim of achieving good ecological potential and good surface water chemical status by 2015 (or 2027 where measures would take longer to implement). -
UNITED KINGDOM) (C426 Bis
WESTMINSTER PALACE AND WESTMINSTER ABBEY INCLUDING SAINT MARGARET’S CHURCH (UNITED KINGDOM) (C426 bis) 1. Executive summary of the report In accordance with Decision 39 COM 7B.87, the United Kingdom State Party has produced a State of Conservation Report (SOCR) for Westminster Palace and Westminster Abbey including Saint Margaret’s Church World Heritage Site. This SOCR updates the Committee on changes that have been made to planning policies and to the progress of development proposals, which could be considered to affect the Outstanding Universal Value of the World Heritage Site, since the last report which was submitted to the World Heritage Centre in January 2015. Specifically, in response to the Committee’s decision, this report provides updated information on the proposed conservation works at the Palace of Westminster, the review of the World Heritage Site Management Plan and an update on the proposals at Elizabeth House in Waterloo and the Vauxhall/Nine Elms sites that have been previously discussed by the Committee. The report is structured according to the format provided by the World Heritage Centre. The clauses of the World Heritage Committee decisions are given in italic and indented. The response of the State Party is not indented and does not use italics. 1 WESTMINSTER PALACE AND WESTMINSTER ABBEY INCLUDING SAINT MARGARET’S CHURCH (UNITED KINGDOM) (C426 bis) 2. Response from the State Party to the World Heritage Committee’s Decision, paragraph by paragraph. Decision 39 COM 7B.87 The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decisions 37 COM 7B.90 and 38 COM 7B.36, adopted at its 37th (Phnom Penh, 2013) and 38th (Doha, 2014) sessions respectively, 3.