N a S a Fa C Ts

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

N a S a Fa C Ts National Aeronautics and Space Administration Fast, Affordable, Science and Technology SATellite (FASTSAT) Microsatellite FASTSAT is NASA’s first microsatellite designed FASTSAT establishes a platform and environment to create a capability that increases opportunities where science and technology research experiment for secondary, scientific and technology payloads, payloads of low- and mid-level complexity can be or rideshares, to be flown at lower cost than flown responsively and affordably in low-Earth orbit previously possible. The FASTSAT microsatellite design supports the The overall objective of the FASTSAT mission is standards of the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle to demonstrate the capability to build, design and Secondary Payload Adaptor, or ESPA – an adapter facts test a microsatellite platform to enable govern- ring developed by the U.S. Department of Defense, mental, academic and industry researchers to or DoD, specifically for accommodating secondary conduct low-cost scientific and technology exper- spacecraft launch opportunities. iments on an autonomous satellite in space. Such research is intended to support NASA’s Science Mission Directorate and Exploration Systems Mission Directorate, led by NASA Headquarters in Washington. NASA The FASTSAT spacecraft bus outfitted with six payloads. Credit: NASA The Mission Mission Profile Gaining access to space is a costly endeavor with limited FASTSAT is one of three secondary microsatellites payloads opportunities for small launch payloads. Delayed access to approved to fly on a Minotaur IV launch vehicle built and oper- space impacts science and technology research that could ated by Orbital Sciences Corporation, to be launched from the bring advancements or solutions to real-world problems. Alaska Aerospace Development Corporation’s Kodiak Launch Complex on Kodiak Island, Alaska. FASTSAT, leveraging the ESPA ring, will allow multiple users opportunities to conduct research on numerous launch vehi- Outfitted with six technology and atmospheric experiments, cles in space at lower cost and with greater frequency than FASTSAT will lift off from Kodiak in late fall 2010. Approximately previously possible. 20 minutes after launch, FASTSAT will separate from the launch vehicle for orbital insertion. Thirty minutes later, FASTSAT will The ESPA ring mounts up to six, 400-pound secondary satellites automatically power up to begin initial checkout operations. to “share a ride to space” with an additional primary payload up to 15,000 pounds. The ESPA ring attaches between the primary Within one hour after launch, FASTSAT will separate from the payload and the expendable upper stage on an Atlas V or Delta launch vehicle. The Marshall Center will contact the spacecraft IV. ESPA provides a “virtually free” ride for ESPA-class satellites and begin on orbit operations. For the first 11 days after launch, and increased opportunities for launch ridesharing with DoD the spacecraft and the experiments will go through an on-orbit ESPA configurable launch vehicles for science and technology commissioning phase. experiments. Once commissioning is complete, the next 180 days are The FASTSAT project began in late 2008, when NASA’s Marshall focused on science operations. A checkout and performance Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Ala., and the Department of analysis of each science instrument will be performed and then Defense Space Test Program at the Space Development and one by one each experiment will turn on to perform its science Test Wing at Kirtland Air Force Base, N.M., formed a partner- objectives. After the science phase is complete, additional ship to develop a high risk, low-cost technology demonstration characterization of the spacecraft will be performed to test experiment. The development pace was fast because the Space additional flight objectives. The experiments will be performed Test Program had received notification just 14 months prior to in parallel to test the overall abilities of the spacecraft. This will launch that a secondary payload had been cancelled on the last approximately 100 days. After completion of this phase of STP-S26 mission, opening up a 25-percent payload vacancy. the mission, the command will be sent to shut down the space- craft, which will go into a decommissioning phase. FASTSAT was selected as an “outside the box” solution that afforded a highly synergistic concept which satisfied experi- Mission control for FASTSAT and its onboard experiments ment, payload and launch schedule requirements. The micro- will be managed from the small satellite mission control room satellite was designed, assembled and tested in-house at the at the Marshall Center’s Huntsville Operations and Science Marshall Center using off-the-shelf commercial hardware by Control Center. Experiment operations also will be performed NASA and a group of industry partners. using the control center’s capabilities for managing remote science operations by investigators at their own facilities. FASTSAT will serve as a scientific laboratory platform contain- ing all the resources needed to carry out scientific and technol- Spacecraft Overview: ogy research operations for the mission time period. FASTSAT FASTSAT enables both NASA and military opportunities and all six experiments have successfully passed all phases to conduct innovative research missions that gain unique of ground development and test operations in preparation scientific insights or mature the readiness of new technol- for launch to low-Earth orbit, and have been approved by the ogy components, subsystems or systems by increasing the Department of Defense’s Space Experiments Review Board, a Technology Readiness Level for future missions. FASTSAT group of defense organizations and NASA personnel assigned was developed with a simplicity in the design of the space- to maintain the defense department’s experiment priority list. craft subsystems that provide power management, onboard Potential space experiments are reviewed and ranked by prior- storage of experiment data, control of experiments, communi- ity. The highest ranking experiments are flown by the Space cations with ground stations, propellantless mechanisms Test Program as budget and resources permit. for attitude control and a GPS system for navigation. FASTSAT 2 NASA Facts Miniature Star Tracker (MST) NanoSail-D deployer subsystem Miniature Imager for Neutral Ionosheric atoms and Magnetospheric Electrons (MINI ME) Threat Detection System (TDS) Plasma Impedance Thermospheric Spectrum Analyzer (PISA) Temperature Imager (TTI) Experiments Overview: Threat Detection System and Miniature Star Tracker NanoSail-D The Threat Detection System NanoSail-D is designed to and the Miniature Star Tracker demonstrate deployment of are managed by the Air Force a compact solar sail boom Research Laboratory at Kirtland system that could lead to Air Force Base. further development of NanoSail-D stowed Miniature Star Tracker this alternative propulsion The objective of the Threat Detection System is to evaluate tech- technology and FASTSAT’s niques for measuring the atmospheric propagating characteristics ability to eject a nanosatel- on coherent light generated from known ground stations. lite from a microsatellite – while avoiding re-contact Star Tracker Lens Camera with the FASTSAT satellite bus. NanoSail-D, managed Sunshade by the Marshall Center, will be the first NASA solar sail NanoSail-D deployed deployed in low Earth orbit. Lens Holder NanoSail-D was designed and built by NASA engineers Transmission Grating Camera Holder at Marshall, in collaboration with the Nanosatellite Missions Threat Detection System Office at NASA’s Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, Calif., and Nexolve located in Huntsville. The experiment The FASTSAT spacecraft carries three atmospheric instru- is a combined effort between the U.S. Air Force Research ments built at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Laboratory at Kirtland Air Force Base, N.M., NASA and the Greenbelt, Md., in partnership with the U.S. Naval Academy U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command and the in Annapolis, Md. The instruments include the Thermosphere Von Braun Center for Science & Innovation, both in Huntsville. Temperature Imager, designed to measure remotely the FASTSAT 3 NASA Facts temperature, atomic oxygen and molecular nitrogen densities of the thermosphere; the Miniature Imager for Neutral Iono- spheric Atoms and Magnetospheric Electrons, a low-energy neutral atom imager that will detect neutral atoms formed in the plasma population of the Earth’s outer atmosphere to improve global space weather prediction; and the Plasma and Impedence Spectrum Analyzer, a device that will test a new measurement technique for the temperature and density of Plasma and Impedence Spectrum Analyzer thermal electrons in the ionosphere – which can interfere with radio-based communications and navigation. The Plasma and Impedance Spectrum Analyzer will test a new measurement technique for the thermal electron populations in Thermosphere the ionosphere, calculating their density structuring, which can Temperature Imager interfere with or scatter radio signals used for communication and navigation. The analyzer will determine when and where the The Thermospheric ionosphere becomes structured or turbulent, permitting better Temperature Imager predictive models of space weather effects on GPS signals. will provide the first global-scale measure- The FASTSAT Team ments of thermospheric temperature profiles in FASTSAT will fly on the
Recommended publications
  • Space) Barriers for 50 Years: the Past, Present, and Future of the Dod Space Test Program
    SSC17-X-02 Breaking (Space) Barriers for 50 Years: The Past, Present, and Future of the DoD Space Test Program Barbara Manganis Braun, Sam Myers Sims, James McLeroy The Aerospace Corporation 2155 Louisiana Blvd NE, Suite 5000, Albuquerque, NM 87110-5425; 505-846-8413 [email protected] Colonel Ben Brining USAF SMC/ADS 3548 Aberdeen Ave SE, Kirtland AFB NM 87117-5776; 505-846-8812 [email protected] ABSTRACT 2017 marks the 50th anniversary of the Department of Defense Space Test Program’s (STP) first launch. STP’s predecessor, the Space Experiments Support Program (SESP), launched its first mission in June of 1967; it used a Thor Burner II to launch an Army and a Navy satellite carrying geodesy and aurora experiments. The SESP was renamed to the Space Test Program in July 1971, and has flown over 568 experiments on over 251 missions to date. Today the STP is managed under the Air Force’s Space and Missile Systems Center (SMC) Advanced Systems and Development Directorate (SMC/AD), and continues to provide access to space for DoD-sponsored research and development missions. It relies heavily on small satellites, small launch vehicles, and innovative approaches to space access to perform its mission. INTRODUCTION Today STP continues to provide access to space for DoD-sponsored research and development missions, Since space first became a viable theater of operations relying heavily on small satellites, small launch for the Department of Defense (DoD), space technologies have developed at a rapid rate. Yet while vehicles, and innovative approaches to space access.
    [Show full text]
  • FASTSAT a Mini-Satellite Mission…..A Way Ahead”
    Proposed Abstract: Under the combined Category and Title: “FASTSAT a Mini-Satellite Mission…..A Way Ahead” Authors: Mark E. Boudreaux, Joseph Casas, Timothy A. Smith The Fast Affordable Science and Technology Spacecraft (FASTSAT) is a mini-satellite weighing less than 150 kg. FASTSAT was developed as government-industry collaborative research and development flight project targeting rapid access to space to provide an alternative, low cost platform for a variety of scientific, research, and technology payloads. The initial spacecraft was designed to carry six instruments and launch as a secondary “rideshare” payload. This design approach greatly reduced overall mission costs while maximizing the on-board payload accommodations. FASTSAT was designed from the ground up to meet a challenging short schedule using modular components with a flexible, configurable layout to enable a broad range of payloads at a lower cost and shorter timeline than scaling down a more complex spacecraft. The integrated spacecraft along with its payloads were readied for launch 15 months from authority to proceed. As an ESPA-class spacecraft, FASTSAT is compatible with many different launch vehicles, including Minotaur I, Minotaur IV, Delta IV, Atlas V, Pegasus, Falcon 1/1e, and Falcon 9. These vehicles offer an array of options for launch sites and provide for a variety of rideshare possibilities. FASTSAT a Mini Satellite Mission …..A Way Ahead 15th Annual Space & Missile Defense Conference Session Track 1.2 : Operations for Small, Tactical Satellites Mark Boudreaux/NASA
    [Show full text]
  • Astrobiology in Low Earth Orbit
    The O/OREOS Mission – Astrobiology in Low Earth Orbit P. Ehrenfreund1, A.J. Ricco2, D. Squires2, C. Kitts3, E. Agasid2, N. Bramall2, K. Bryson4, J. Chittenden2, C. Conley5, A. Cook2, R. Mancinelli4, A. Mattioda2, W. Nicholson6, R. Quinn7, O. Santos2, G. Tahu5, M. Voytek5, C. Beasley2, L. Bica3, M. Diaz-Aguado2, C. Friedericks2, M. Henschke2, J.W. Hines2, D. Landis8, E. Luzzi2, D. Ly2, N. Mai2, G. Minelli2, M. McIntyre2, M. Neumann3, M. Parra2, M. Piccini2, R. Rasay3, R. Ricks2, A. Schooley2, E. Stackpole2, L. Timucin2, B. Yost2, A. Young3 1Space Policy Institute, Washington, DC, USA [email protected], 2NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA, 3Robotic Systems Laboratory, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, USA, 4Bay Area Environmental Research Institute, Sonoma, CA, USA, 5NASA Headquarters, Washington DC, USA, 6University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA, 7SETI Institute, Mountain View, CA, USA, 8Draper Laboratory, Cambridge, MA, USA Abstract. The O/OREOS (Organism/Organic Exposure to Orbital Stresses) nanosatellite is the first science demonstration spacecraft and flight mission of the NASA Astrobiology Small- Payloads Program (ASP). O/OREOS was launched successfully on November 19, 2010, to a high-inclination (72°), 650-km Earth orbit aboard a US Air Force Minotaur IV rocket from Kodiak, Alaska. O/OREOS consists of 3 conjoined cubesat (each 1000 cm3) modules: (i) a control bus, (ii) the Space Environment Survivability of Living Organisms (SESLO) experiment, and (iii) the Space Environment Viability of Organics (SEVO) experiment. Among the innovative aspects of the O/OREOS mission are a real-time analysis of the photostability of organics and biomarkers and the collection of data on the survival and metabolic activity for micro-organisms at 3 times during the 6-month mission.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights in Space 2010
    International Astronautical Federation Committee on Space Research International Institute of Space Law 94 bis, Avenue de Suffren c/o CNES 94 bis, Avenue de Suffren UNITED NATIONS 75015 Paris, France 2 place Maurice Quentin 75015 Paris, France Tel: +33 1 45 67 42 60 Fax: +33 1 42 73 21 20 Tel. + 33 1 44 76 75 10 E-mail: : [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Fax. + 33 1 44 76 74 37 URL: www.iislweb.com OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS URL: www.iafastro.com E-mail: [email protected] URL : http://cosparhq.cnes.fr Highlights in Space 2010 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law The United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs is responsible for promoting international cooperation in the peaceful uses of outer space and assisting developing countries in using space science and technology. United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs P. O. Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel: (+43-1) 26060-4950 Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5830 E-mail: [email protected] URL: www.unoosa.org United Nations publication Printed in Austria USD 15 Sales No. E.11.I.3 ISBN 978-92-1-101236-1 ST/SPACE/57 *1180239* V.11-80239—January 2011—775 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS UNITED NATIONS OFFICE AT VIENNA Highlights in Space 2010 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law Progress in space science, technology and applications, international cooperation and space law UNITED NATIONS New York, 2011 UniTEd NationS PUblication Sales no.
    [Show full text]
  • The O/OREOS Mission—Astrobiology in Low Earth Orbit
    Acta Astronautica 93 (2014) 501–508 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Acta Astronautica journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/actaastro The O/OREOS mission—Astrobiology in low Earth orbit P. Ehrenfreund a,n, A.J. Ricco b, D. Squires b, C. Kitts c, E. Agasid b, N. Bramall b, K. Bryson d, J. Chittenden b, C. Conley e, A. Cook b, R. Mancinelli d, A. Mattioda b, W. Nicholson f, R. Quinn g, O. Santos b,G.Tahue,M.Voyteke, C. Beasley b,L.Bicac, M. Diaz-Aguado b, C. Friedericks b,M.Henschkeb,D.Landish, E. Luzzi b,D.Lyb, N. Mai b, G. Minelli b,M.McIntyreb,M.Neumannc, M. Parra b, M. Piccini b, R. Rasay c,R.Ricksb, A. Schooley b, E. Stackpole b, L. Timucin b,B.Yostb, A. Young c a Space Policy Institute, Washington DC, USA b NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA c Robotic Systems Laboratory, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, USA d Bay Area Environmental Research Institute, Sonoma, CA, USA e NASA Headquarters, Washington DC, USA f University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA g SETI Institute, Mountain View, CA, USA h Draper Laboratory, Cambridge, MA, USA article info abstract Article history: The O/OREOS (Organism/Organic Exposure to Orbital Stresses) nanosatellite is the first Received 19 December 2011 science demonstration spacecraft and flight mission of the NASA Astrobiology Small- Received in revised form Payloads Program (ASP). O/OREOS was launched successfully on November 19, 2010, to 22 June 2012 a high-inclination (721), 650-km Earth orbit aboard a US Air Force Minotaur IV rocket Accepted 18 September 2012 from Kodiak, Alaska.
    [Show full text]
  • 120 Application of Nanosatellites in the Near
    SES 2013 Ninth Scientific Conference with International Participation SPACE, ECOLOGY, SAFETY 20 – 22 November 2013, Sofia, Bulgaria APPLICATION OF NANOSATELLITES IN THE NEAR-EARTH SPACE INVESTIGATION Daniela Boneva1, Lachezar Filipov1, Krasimira Yankova1, Deyan Gotchev1, Zhivko Zhelezov2, Georgi Chamov2, Mariya Bivolarska2, Spaska Yaneva2 1Space Research and Technology Institute – Bulgarian Academy of Sciences 2Space Research Ltd e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] [email protected], [email protected] Keywords: Nanosatellites; Near-Earth Space; Zodiacal Light; Abstract: We present based characteristics of the nanosatellites’ equipment and we point to the advantages of their usage. The purpose of this paper is to survey the applications of nanosatellites as a new and advanced technology. It is reviewed the most employable of them in space science and technology. We present the conception of our new project that will investigate the polarimetry of the Zodiacal light on a Sun-synchronous low Earth orbit. ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ НА НАНОСАТЕЛИТИ В ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕТО НА БЛИЗКИЯ КОСМОС Даниела Бонева1, Лъчезар Филипов1, Красимира Янкова1, Деян Гочев1, Живко Железов2, Георги Чамов2, Мария Биволарска2, Спаска Янева2 1Институт за космически изследвания и технологии – Българска академия на науките 2Спейс рисърч ООД e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] [email protected], [email protected] Ключови думи: Наносателити;Близък космос;Зодиакална светлина; Резюме: Представени са основни характеристики на наносателитите и са посочени предимствата на използването им. Целта на тази статия е да се проучат приложенията на наносателитите като нова и напреднала технология. Разгледани са най-пригодни за заетост от тях в областта на космическите науки и технологии.
    [Show full text]
  • Espinsights the Global Space Activity Monitor
    ESPInsights The Global Space Activity Monitor Issue 2 May–June 2019 CONTENTS FOCUS ..................................................................................................................... 1 European industrial leadership at stake ............................................................................ 1 SPACE POLICY AND PROGRAMMES .................................................................................... 2 EUROPE ................................................................................................................. 2 9th EU-ESA Space Council .......................................................................................... 2 Europe’s Martian ambitions take shape ......................................................................... 2 ESA’s advancements on Planetary Defence Systems ........................................................... 2 ESA prepares for rescuing Humans on Moon .................................................................... 3 ESA’s private partnerships ......................................................................................... 3 ESA’s international cooperation with Japan .................................................................... 3 New EU Parliament, new EU European Space Policy? ......................................................... 3 France reflects on its competitiveness and defence posture in space ...................................... 3 Germany joins consortium to support a European reusable rocket.........................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Dynamics and Control of the Cubesail Mission — a Solar Sailing
    © 2010 Andrzej Pukniel. THE DYNAMICS AND CONTROL OF THE CUBESAIL MISSION—A SOLAR SAILING DEMONSTRATION BY ANDRZEJ PUKNIEL DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy in Aerospace Engineering in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2010 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Victoria Coverstone, Chair Professor John Prussing Professor Rodney Burton Professor Gary Swenson ABSTRACT The proposed study addresses two issues related to the slow emergence of solar sailing as a viable space propulsion method. The low technology readiness level and complications related to stowage, deployment, and support of the sail structure are both addressed by combining the CU Aerospace and University of Illinois-developed UltraSail and CubeSat expertise to design a small-scale solar sail deployment and propulsion experiment in low Earth orbit. The study analyzes multiple aspects of the problem from initial sizing and packaging of the solar sail film into two CubeSat-class spacecraft, through on-orbit deployment dynamics, attitude control of large and flexible space structure, and predictions of performance and orbital maneuvering capability. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The following work would have not been possible without the continuous support and encouragement of my advisor, Professor Coverstone. Her patience, scientific insight, and enthusiasm are a rare combination that fosters a unique research environment. It allows the students to develop both as highly competent engineers as well as young individuals. Few advisors sincerely care for their students’ personal development as much as Professor Coverstone and I consider myself privileged to be part of her research group. I would also like to thank Professors Rod Burton and Gary Swenson as well as Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Failures in Spacecraft Systems: an Analysis from The
    FAILURES IN SPACECRAFT SYSTEMS: AN ANALYSIS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF DECISION MAKING A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Purdue University by Vikranth R. Kattakuri In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering August 2019 Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana ii THE PURDUE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL STATEMENT OF THESIS APPROVAL Dr. Jitesh H. Panchal, Chair School of Mechanical Engineering Dr. Ilias Bilionis School of Mechanical Engineering Dr. William Crossley School of Aeronautics and Astronautics Approved by: Dr. Jay P. Gore Associate Head of Graduate Studies iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am extremely grateful to my advisor Prof. Jitesh Panchal for his patient guidance throughout the two years of my studies. I am indebted to him for considering me to be a part of his research group and for providing this opportunity to work in the fields of systems engineering and mechanical design for a period of 2 years. Being a research and teaching assistant under him had been a rewarding experience. Without his valuable insights, this work would not only have been possible, but also inconceivable. I would like to thank my co-advisor Prof. Ilias Bilionis for his valuable inputs, timely guidance and extremely engaging research meetings. I thank my committee member, Prof. William Crossley for his interest in my work. I had a great opportunity to attend all three courses taught by my committee members and they are the best among all the courses I had at Purdue. I would like to thank my mentors Dr. Jagannath Raju of Systemantics India Pri- vate Limited and Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2011 – Spring 2012
    Summer 2011 – Spring 2012 HSGC Report Number 12-21 Compiled in 2012 by HAWAI‘I SPACE GRANT CONSORTIUM The Hawai‘i Space Grant Consortium is one of the fifty-two National Space Grant Colleges supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Material in this volume may be copied for library, abstract service, education, or personal research; however, republication of any paper or portion thereof requires the written permission of the authors as well as appropriate acknowledgment of this publication. This report may be cited as Hawai‘i Space Grant Consortium (2012) Undergraduate and Graduate Fellowship Reports. HSGC Report No. 12-21. Hawai‘i Space Grant Consortium, Honolulu. Individual articles may be cited as Author, A.B. (2012) Title of article. Undergraduate and Graduate Fellowship Reports, pp. xx-xx. Hawai‘i Space Grant Consortium, Honolulu. This report is distributed by: Hawai‘i Space Grant Consortium Hawai‘i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa 1680 East West Road, POST 501 Honolulu, HI 96822 Table of Contents Foreword .............................................................................................................................. i FELLOWSHIP REPORTS THE LIFETIME AND ABUNDANCE OF SLOPE STREAKS ON MARS .....................1 Justin M. R. Bergonio University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa IDENTIFICATION AND PHOTMETRY OF CANDIDATE TRANSITING EXOPLANET SIGNALS ....................................................................................................8 Emily K. Chang University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa TESTSAT STRUCTURE AND INTERFACE DESIGN AND FABRICATION ............16 Jonathan R. Chinen University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa MINERALOGICAL STUDY OF VOLCANIC SUBLIMATES FROM HALEMA‘UMA‘U CRATER, KILAUEA VOLCANO………………………………..24 Liliana G. DeSmither University of Hawai‘i at Hilo DETERMINING DIMENSIONAL RATIOS FOR FRESH, DEGRADED, AND FLOOR-FRACTURED LUNAR CRATERS ...................................................................31 Elyse K.
    [Show full text]
  • External Payloads Proposer's Guide to the International Space Station
    SSP 51071 Baseline External Payloads Proposer’s Guide to the International Space Station International Space Station Program Baseline August 2017 National Aeronautics and Space Administration International Space Station Program Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas This Document Is Uncontrolled When Printed. Verify Current version before use. SSP 51071 Baseline REVISION AND HISTORY REV. DESCRIPTION PUB. DATE - Initial Release (Reference per SSCD 15774, EFF. 09-29-2017) 10-02-17 Public access authorization obtained via the Document Availability Authorization Control Number: “40352” This Document Is Uncontrolled When Printed. Verify Current Version Before Use. SSP 51071 Baseline TABLE OF CONTENTS PARAGRAPH PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION FOR OPERATING ON ISS ........................................................ 2-1 2.1 HOW TO GET STARTED ...................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 ISS FEASIBILITY RESOURCE ACCOMMODATION ASSESSMENT PROCESS ................ 2-2 2.3 WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ............................................................................................... 2-5 2.4 ORGANIZATIONAL ROLES/RESPONSIBILITIES ................................................................ 2-7 2.5 ROLES/RESPONSIBILITIES OF PAYLOAD PROVIDERS ................................................... 2-8 3.0 COMMON ACCOMMODATIONS, RESOURCES, AND ENVIRONMENTS
    [Show full text]
  • <> CRONOLOGIA DE LOS SATÉLITES ARTIFICIALES DE LA
    1 SATELITES ARTIFICIALES. Capítulo 5º Subcap. 10 <> CRONOLOGIA DE LOS SATÉLITES ARTIFICIALES DE LA TIERRA. Esta es una relación cronológica de todos los lanzamientos de satélites artificiales de nuestro planeta, con independencia de su éxito o fracaso, tanto en el disparo como en órbita. Significa pues que muchos de ellos no han alcanzado el espacio y fueron destruidos. Se señala en primer lugar (a la izquierda) su nombre, seguido de la fecha del lanzamiento, el país al que pertenece el satélite (que puede ser otro distinto al que lo lanza) y el tipo de satélite; este último aspecto podría no corresponderse en exactitud dado que algunos son de finalidad múltiple. En los lanzamientos múltiples, cada satélite figura separado (salvo en los casos de fracaso, en que no llegan a separarse) pero naturalmente en la misma fecha y juntos. NO ESTÁN incluidos los llevados en vuelos tripulados, si bien se citan en el programa de satélites correspondiente y en el capítulo de “Cronología general de lanzamientos”. .SATÉLITE Fecha País Tipo SPUTNIK F1 15.05.1957 URSS Experimental o tecnológico SPUTNIK F2 21.08.1957 URSS Experimental o tecnológico SPUTNIK 01 04.10.1957 URSS Experimental o tecnológico SPUTNIK 02 03.11.1957 URSS Científico VANGUARD-1A 06.12.1957 USA Experimental o tecnológico EXPLORER 01 31.01.1958 USA Científico VANGUARD-1B 05.02.1958 USA Experimental o tecnológico EXPLORER 02 05.03.1958 USA Científico VANGUARD-1 17.03.1958 USA Experimental o tecnológico EXPLORER 03 26.03.1958 USA Científico SPUTNIK D1 27.04.1958 URSS Geodésico VANGUARD-2A
    [Show full text]