DOCSLIB.ORG

A Qualitative Examination of Women's Abortion Experiences

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Qualitative Examination of Women's Abortion Experiences University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Master's Theses and Capstones Student Scholarship Fall 2006 Talking about abortion: A qualitative examination of women's abortion experiences Diana L. Dumais University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis Recommended Citation Dumais, Diana L., "Talking about abortion: A qualitative examination of women's abortion experiences" (2006). Master's Theses and Capstones. 27. https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis/27 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses and Capstones by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TALKING ABOUT ABORTION: A QUALITATIVE EXAMINATION OF WOMEN’S ABORTION EXPERIENCES BY Diana L. Dumais B.A. Psychology, Keene State College, 2000 THESIS Submitted to the University of New Hampshire In Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts In Sociology September 2006 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 1437627 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. ® UMI UMI Microform 1437627 Copyright 2006 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. This thesis has been examined and approved. Thesis Director, Michele Dillon, Professor of Sociology inda Blum, Associate Professor of Sociology James ;er, Associate Professor of Sociology J^an Elspn, Assistant rnSfessor of Sociology Bhlot Date I Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION....................................................................................................................vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.................................................................................................vii ABSTRACT.....................................................................................................................viii CHAPTER PAGE INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................1 I. LITERATURE REVIEW.............................................................................................8 A. The Abortion Debate: Before Roe v. Wade ......................................................8 B. Roe v. Wade and Beyond .................................................................................12 C. Abortion Attitudes ............................................................................................17 D. Pro-Life and Pro-Choice Viewpoints .............................................................. 22 E. Is Compromise Possible? .................................................................................24 F. Emotional Responses to Abortion ................................................................... 27 G. Gaps in the Literature.......................................................................................30 II. METHODS................................................................................................................31 A. Sample..............................................................................................................32 B. Data Analysis...................................................................................................35 C. Limitations of the Methodology ..................................................................... 36 III. THE ABORTION EXPERIENCE: FEMINIST IDEOLOGY AND ACTIVISM...............................................................................................................38 iii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. IV. RELIGION AND THE ABORTION EXPERIENCE..............................................55 A. Praying for Forgiveness ................ 56 B. Religion as Irrelevant ...................................*..................................................62 C. Rejection of Religion .................................... 66 D. Running the Gamut of Religious Experience ..................................................70 V. SOCIAL SUPPORT AND THE ABORTION EXPERIENCE................................82 ! A. Family Support.......................................... 84 B. Partial Support..................................................................................................90 C. Telling the Secret .............................................................................................92 D. The Absence of Family Support.................................................... 95 E. Non-Support..............................................4................................................... 100 VI. THE EMOTIONAL EXPERIENCE OF ABORTION..........................................107 A. Abortion Without Conflict .............................................................................107 B. Faces of Conflict: Temporary Doubt ............................................................I ll C. Guilt, Punishment, and Forgiveness ..............................................................I ll D. Ambivalence and Regret..................................................... 115 E. Dissonance ......................................................................................................117 F. What Constitutes Life? ...................................................................................117 G. Missed Opportunities.....................................................................................119 H. An Opportunity to Grow................................................................................121 I. An Ounce of Prevention ..................................................................................121 J. A New Lease on Life ......................................................................................122 iv Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. VII. CONCLUSION.................................... ..............................................................126 A. Feminist Ideology and Activism ...........................................................126 B. Religion and the Abortion Experience ...........................................................128 C. Abortion and Social Support ..........................................................................129 D. The Emotional Experience of Abortion .........................................................130 E. Limitations of the Research ............................................................................131 F. Theoretical Implications and Suggestions for Further Research ....................131 REFERENCES................................................................................................................134 APPENDIX A: SUMMARY OF KEY CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERVIEWEES................................................................................................140 APPENDIX B: INSTITIONAL REVIEW BOARD FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS IN RESEARCH AUTHORIZATION.........................................141 v Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to the memory of my aunt, Alison Wiggin, who inspired and encouraged me more than I was ever able to let her know. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to acknowledge the Sociology Department faculty for all of their help and guidance with this thesis, some of whom went above and beyond the call of duty to convince me that I would indeed finish. In particular, I would like to thank my committee members, Linda Blum, Jean Elson, and James Tucker for their support and feedback throughout the writing process. I appreciate your patience, kindness, and encouragement. I would like to thank my thesis chair and advisor, Michele Dillon. Michele has been a constant source of support and inspiration to me since I arrived at UNH. She has had an overwhelmingly amount of faith in me throughout my graduate education and at times has believed in me more than I believed in myself. She continually challenges me to reach beyond my own expectations and for that I am forever grateful. I owe a debt of gratitude to my Mom and Dad—Thank you for enabling me to spend my summer on this project; without that time, I do not know what I would have done. I would like to thank all of my friends
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Forced Abortion in China PRI Staff / November 1, 2001
    UNFPA Whitewash: Forced Abortion in China PRI Staff / November 1, 2001 Population Research Institute (PRI) has obtained a copy of a letter sent from the Executive Director of the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), Thoraya Ahmed Obaid, to the US Secretary of State, Colin L. Powell. The letter, dated 19 November 2001, falsely claims that information presented by PRI to members of the US Congress regarding UNFPA-supported abuses in China is untrue.1 Visit to China PRI investigators this September visited a county in Southern China where UNFPA claims coercion does not exist. In Sihui county, Guangdong province, they obtained testimony from victims of a UNFPA-funded family planning program who had suffered forced abortion, forced sterilization and destruction of homes and property at the hands of local officials. They presented this evidence at an October 17 hearing of the House International Relations Committee, along with further evidence linking these abuses to the UNFPA. In their opinion, based on interviews with two dozen women, coercion in Sihui county is as bad today as it ever has been. The UNFPA sought to counter PRI’s on-the-ground investigation of UNFPA-funded family planning programs by carrying out its own in-house review. A delegation of UNFPA employees and associates was hastily organized and sent to China in October. The seven- and-a-half page “mission report” produced by that delegation describes visits with Chinese officials in Beijing, Guangzhou, Sihui county, and Hubei Province, all of whom — not surprisingly — denied
    [Show full text]
  • The Regulatory Model of Abortion in China Through a Feminist Lens* 1 Weiwei Cao Hunan University, China
    The Regulatory Model of Abortion in China through a Feminist Lens* 1 Weiwei Cao Hunan University, China Abstract A medical, surgical termination of pregnancy is the only means of avoiding an unplanned and unwanted birth when contraception fails. Access to safe and afford- able abortion is therefore essential to satisfy women’s rights to health and the exercise of control over life choices. Restrictive law is usually considered as the main cause of abortions performed in illegal and unhygienic clinics, which could be health- or life-threatening. Thus, many feminists argue that women’s reproductive health and rights would be promoted by establishing a less restrictive regulatory model of abortion. By examining the Chinese abortion law, this paper aims to analyze whether it is liberal and if so, how it satisfies women’s rights to health and re- productive self-determination. While the law looks unrestrictive, in reality it fails to serve this purpose and instead facilitates the state’s manipulation of female fertility. Since the regulation of abortion in China is significantly determined by the state’s policy-making in relation to population, an in-depth analysis of the connection be- tween regulation and policy is given to indicate how the state imposes the burden of achieving its population goals on women. In addition, to further scrutinize how women’s rights to health and reproductive decision-making are violated by the im- plementation of abortion law in practice, this paper offers a discussion on the Chinese-style practice of family planning. Finally, feasible proposals are made for reformulating the Chinese regulatory model, so it can protect women’s health and reproductive rights from the state’s coercive involvement and can promote women’s access to adequate medical and state support.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the British Association for Chinese Studies
    Journal of the British Association for Chinese Studies Volume 8, Issue 1, January 2018 ISSN 2048-0601 Journal of the British Association for Chinese Studies This e-journal is a peer-reviewed publication produced by the British Association for Chinese Studies (BACS). It is intended as a service to the academic community designed to encourage the production and dissemination of high quality research to an international audience. It publishes research falling within BACS’ remit, which is broadly interpreted to include China, and the Chinese diaspora, from its earliest history to contemporary times, and spanning the disciplines of the arts, humanities and social sciences. Editors Sarah Dauncey (University of Nottingham) Gerda Wielander (University of Westminster) Sub-Editor Scott Pacey (University of Nottingham) Editorial Board Tim Barrett (School of Oriental and African Studies) Jane Duckett (University of Glasgow) Harriet Evans (University of Westminster) Stephanie Hemelryk Donald (University of New South Wales) Stephan Feuchtwang (London School of Economics) Natascha Gentz (University of Edinburgh) Rana Mitter (University of Oxford) Qian Suoqiao (University of Newcastle) Caroline Rose (University of Leeds) Naomi Standen (University of Birmingham) Yao Shujie (University of Nottingham) Journal of the British Association for Chinese Studies Volume 8, Issue 1, January 2018 Contents Editors’ Introduction iv Articles Premarital Abortion—What is the Harm? The Responsibilisation of 1 Women’s Pregnancy Among China’s “Privileged” Daughters Kailing Xie Encompassing the Horse: Analogy, Category, and Scale in the Yijing 32 William Matthews The Favourable Partner: An Analysis of Lianhe Zaobao’s 62 Representation of China in Southeast Asia Daniel R. Hammond Free Trade, Yes; Ideology, Not So Much: The UK’s Shifting China Policy 92 2010-16 Scott A.W.
    [Show full text]
  • N:Zb1~)Eibi,Gs' '• :,) T
    - ~ { , :;,' ,$ v.¥. ' ~ n:zb1~)eibi,Gs' '• :,) t,-. ~ "' ' < ' ' ·,;::t_;, 1/' t· i ·.-....-=$: 1 ~❖ :::: Chinese Moral Perspectives on Abortion and Foetal Life: An Historical Account Jing-Bao Nie, MD(tcm), MA, PhD Lecturer, Bioethics Centre, University of Otago, New Zealand Adjunct Professor, Institute of Ethics, Hunan Normal University, China Abstract It is accepted wisdom that, at the present time as well as historically, the typical Chinese attitude toward abortion is very permissive or 'liberal'. It has been widely perceived that Chinese people usually do not consider abortion morally problematic and that they think a human life starts at birth. As a part of a bigger research project on Chinese views and experiences of abortion, this article represents a revisionist historical account of Chinese moral perspectives on abortion and foetal life. By presenting Buddhist and Confucian views ofabortion, traditional Chinese medical understandings offoetal life, the possible moral foundation ofa 'conservative' Confucian position, and some historical features ofabortion laws and policies in twentieth­ century China, this paper shows that blanket assumptions that the Chinese view of abortion has always been permissive are historically unfounded. As in the present, there existed different and opposing views about abortion in history, and many Chinese, noi only Buddhists but also Confucians, believed that deliberately terminating pregnancy is to destroy a human life which starts far earlier than at birth. The current dominant and official line on the subject does not necessarily accord with historical Chinese values and practices. ) Man [sic] has in fact no past unless he is conscious of having one, for only such consciousness makes dialogue and choice possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Health and Abortion Culture in China: Policy, Perception and Practice Naomi Bouchard SIT Study Abroad
    SIT Graduate Institute/SIT Study Abroad SIT Digital Collections Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection SIT Study Abroad Fall 12-1-2014 Women's Health and Abortion Culture in China: Policy, Perception and Practice Naomi Bouchard SIT Study Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection Part of the Asian Studies Commons, Gender, Race, Sexuality, and Ethnicity in Communication Commons, Health Communication Commons, Medical Education Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Bouchard, Naomi, "Women's Health and Abortion Culture in China: Policy, Perception and Practice " (2014). Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection. 1951. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/1951 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the SIT Study Abroad at SIT Digital Collections. It has been accepted for inclusion in Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection by an authorized administrator of SIT Digital Collections. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WOMEN’S HEALTH AND ABORTION CULTURE IN CHINA: POLICY, PERCEPTION AND PRACTICE Bouchard, Naomi Academic Director: Lu, Yuan Project Advisor: Shen, Hei Mei Johns Hopkins University Double Major in International Studies and Sociology China, Kunming Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for China: Language, Cultures and Ethnic Minorities, SIT Study Abroad, Fall 2014 I Abstract Since China’s implementation of the Family Planning Policy in 1973, much research has been dedicated to analyzing the effects of a policy that strictly controls the reproductive lives of a population now comprisedof 1.35 billion people. Analyses focus on the rise of abortions in China, now at an annual rate of at least 13 million, but offer little insight into the perceptions of the population in regard to China’s new abortion culture.
    [Show full text]
  • The Consequences of Son Preference and Sex-Selective Abortion in China and Other Asian Countries
    china-hesketh_Layout 1 8/16/11 1:29 PM Page 1374 Analysis CMAJ The consequences of son preference and sex-selective abortion in China and other Asian countries Therese Hesketh MD PhD, Li Lu MD PhD, Zhu Wei Xing MD MPH Competing interests: arents’ preference for sons is common in mid-1980s, and by 1992 the SRB was reported Therese Hesketh declares countries in East Asia through South Asia, to be as high as 125 in some cities. that her institution has received grants or has Pto the Middle East and North Africa. Sons China soon followed. Here, the situation is grants pending from the are preferred because they have a higher wage- complicated by the one-child policy, which has Department for earning capacity (especially in agrarian econ - undoubtedly contributed to the steady increase in International Development, the Economic and Social omies), they continue the family line and they usu - the reported SRB from 106 in 1979, to 111 in Research Council, and ally take responsibility for care of parents in illness 1990, 117 in 2001 and 121 in 2005. 5 Because of Wellcome Trust. None and old age. 1 There are also specific local reasons China’s huge population, these ratios translate into declared by Li Lu or Wei for son preference: in India, the expense of the very large numbers of excess males. In 2005 it was Xing. dowry; and in South Korea and China, deep-rooted estimated that 1.1 million excess males were born This article has been peer Confucian values and patriarchal family systems.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bio-Politics of Population Control and Sex-Selective Abortion in China
    eminism F & Psychology Special Issue: Abortion In Context (Part 1) Feminism & Psychology 2017, Vol. 27(1) 34–55 The bio-politics of ! The Author(s) 2016 Reprints and permissions: population control and sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0959353516682262 sex-selective abortion journals.sagepub.com/home/fap in China and India Lisa Eklund Lund University, Sweden Navtej Purewal SOAS, University of London, UK Abstract China and India, two countries with skewed sex ratios in favor of males, have introduced a wide range of policies over the past few decades to prevent couples from deselecting daughters, including criminalizing sex-selective abortion through legal jurisdiction. This article aims to analyze how such policies are situated within the bio-politics of popu- lation control and how some of the outcomes reflect each government’s inadequacy in addressing the social dynamics around abortion decision making and the social, physical, and psychological effects on women’s wellbeing in the face of criminalization of sex-selective abortion. The analysis finds that overall, the criminalization of sex selec- tion has not been successful in these two countries. Further, the broader economic, social, and cultural dynamics which produce bias against females must be a part of the strategy to combat sex selection, rather than a narrow criminalization of abortion which endangers women’s access to safe reproductive health services and their social, physical, and psychological wellbeing. Keywords abortion, bio-politics, bio-power, China, criminalization, India, sex selection Introduction The ‘‘missing women’’ polemically identified in economist Amartya Sen’s (1990) seminal piece ‘‘More than 100 Million Women are Missing’’ attributed global trends of masculine sex ratios to daughter deselection before and after birth.
    [Show full text]
  • Sex-Selective Abortions: Evidence from Rural East China 1
    SEX-SELECTIVE ABORTIONS: EVIDENCE FROM RURAL EAST CHINA 1 Chen Wei Center for Population and Development Studies People’s University of China Beijing 100872 China ABSTRACT This article addresses the issue of sex-selective abortion underlying the rising and abnormally high sex ratio at birth in China. The data are derived from a survey of 1602 married women aged 20-45 and from interviews with cadres involved in family planning work in rural East China in 2002. Prenatal sex identification and sex-selective abortion were fairly widespread among the pregnancies after first birth. The aborted foetuses were overwhelmingly females and virtually all the sex-selective abortions were second- or even third-trimester procedures. Cultural context of son preference associated with this practice is discussed. The basic issue underlying son preference is the male-based continuation of the family. Patricentricity, patrilineality and patrilocality are basic elements of the Confucian patriarchal society. The evidence from this study suggests that son preference will continue as long as the cultural context for son preference continues, and legislation outlawing prenatal sex identification can hardly make a difference. 1 This paper is derived from a chapter of my PhD thesis which I did during January 2001 to December 2003 at Demography and Sociology Program of the Australian National University. I am grateful to Professor Terry Hull, Dr. Siew-Ean Khoo, and Dr. Zhao Zhongwei for their comments and suggestions; the related County and Township Family Planning Commission in China for their assistance in the survey, particularly the interviewers and respondents for their time and work involved in the survey; and the Demography and Sociology Program at the Australian National University for a fieldwork grant.
    [Show full text]
  • Medication Abortion a Guide for Health Professionals
    MEDICATION ABORTION A GUIDE FOR HEALTH PROFESSIONALS ABOUT IBIS REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH Ibis Reproductive Health aims to improve women’s reproductive health, choices, and autonomy worldwide. Our work includes clinical and social science research, policy analysis, and evidence-based advocacy. Ibis Reproductive Health has offices in Cambridge, MA and San Francisco, CA (USA) and Johannesburg, South Africa. Information about Ibis Reproductive Health, including a list of publications and a summary of our current projects, can be found at www.ibisreproductivehealth.org. Copies of this reader can be obtained by contacting admin@ ibisreproductivehealth.org. Ibis Reproductive Health 2 Brattle Square Cambridge, MA 02138 Phone: 001-617-349-0040 Fax: 001-617-349-0041 Cover design by Christine DeMars: www.demarsdesign.com Cover image: Detail of a Koran frontispiece based on a decagon grid. Egypt, 14th century. W ilson E. Islamic designs for artists & craftspeople. London: British Museum Publications, 1988. MEDICATION ABORTION A GUIDE FOR HEALTH PROFESSIONALS Author Angel M. Foster, DPhil, AM Translated by Aida Rouhana, MPH & Hafsa Zubaidi, MA Acknowledgements W e would like to thank the following individuals for providing feedback and reviewing earlier drafts of this manuscript: Ms. Katrina Abuabara, Dr. Charlotte Ellertson, Dr. W illiam Fawzy, Dr. Daniel Grossman, Mr. Emad Mancy, Ms. Kate Schaffer, Dr. Beverly W inikoff, Dr. Lisa W ynn W e are grateful to the W illiam and Flora Hewlett Foundation whose funding made this bi-lingual guidebook a reality. This guidebook is dedicated to the memory of Dr. Charlotte Ellertson Visionary, mentor, colleague and friend ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … 1 The medications of abortion… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … ..… … … .
    [Show full text]
  • Preventing Unsafe Abortion and Its Consequences Priorities for Research and Action
    Priorities for Action Research and Abortion Preventing and Unsafe its Consequences nsafe abortion is a significant yet preventable cause of maternal mortality and morbidity. The Ugravity and global incidence of unsafe abortion Preventing call for a better understanding of the factors behind the persistence of unsafe abortion and of the barriers to preventing unsafe abortion and managing its conse- Unsafe Abortion quences. This volume brings together the proceedings from an inter-disciplinary consultation to assess the and its global and regional status of unsafe abortion and to identify a research and action agenda to reduce unsafe abortion and its burden on women, their families, and Consequences public health systems. The volume addresses a compre- hensive range of issues related to research on prevent- ing unsafe abortion, outlines regional priorities, and Priorities for identifies critical topics for future research and action on preventing unsafe abortion. Research and Action Iqbal H. Iqbal Shah H. Warriner Ina K. Editors Ina K. Warriner Iqbal H. Shah cover 4.indd 1 31/01/2006 13:34:26 Preventing Unsafe Abortion and its Consequences Priorities for Research and Action Editors Ina K. Warriner Iqbal H. Shah A-Intro.indd 1 09/02/2006 10:44:45 Suggested citation: Warriner IK and Shah IH, eds., Preventing Unsafe Abortion and its Consequences: Priorities for Research and Action, New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2006. 1. Abortion, Induced - adverse effects 2. Abortion, Induced - epidemiology 3. Women’s health services 4. Health priorities
    [Show full text]
  • Gendercide’, Abortion Policy, and the Disciplining of Prenatal Sex-Selection in Neoliberal Europe
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by SOAS Research Online This is the version of the article accepted for publication in Global Public Health published by Taylor & Francis and available online 14 Feb 2017 at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2017.1289230 Accepted version downloaded from SOAS Research Online: https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/23603/ ‘Gendercide’, Abortion Policy, and the Disciplining of Prenatal Sex-Selection in Neoliberal Europe Navtej Purewal, SOAS University of London Lisa Eklund, University of Lund Abstract This article examines the contours of how sex-selective abortion (SSA) and ‘gendercide’ have been problematically combined within contemporary debates on abortion in Europe. Analysing the development of policies on the topic, we identify three ‘turns’ which have become integral to the biopolitics of SSA in Europe: the biomedical turn, the ‘gendercide’ turn, and the Asian demographic turn. Recent attempts to discipline SSA in the UK and Sweden are examined as a means of showing how the neoliberal state in Europe is becoming increasingly open to manoeuvres to undermine the right to abortion, even where firm laws exist. Keywords: Biopolitics, gendercide, sex selection, abortion, neoliberal state Introduction Sex-selective abortion (SSA) and ‘gendercide’ have been problematically combined with reignited controversies in contemporary debates on abortion in Europe. The notion of ‘missing girls’ (Sen, 2003) implicit in the term ‘gendercide’ highlights the fact that girls
    [Show full text]
  • Safe Abortion and Social Norms
    Safe abortion and social norms An annotated bibliography Claudia Lo Forte November 2018 Acknowledgements Thanks to Rachel Marcus, Shelly Makleff and Fiona Samuels for comments on previous versions of the text and to Kathryn O’Neill for copy-editing. Disclaimer This document is an output of Advancing Learning and Innovation on Gender Norms (ALIGN). The views expressed and information contained within are not necessarily those of or endorsed by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, which accepts no responsibility for such views or information or for any reliance placed on them. ii Safe abortion and social norms: Annotated bibliography Table of contents Introduction 7 Stigma as a proxy for social and gender norms on abortion 10 Intersectionality, social norms, and girls’ and women’s decision-making on abortion 14 Family and community stigma 24 Service providers’ stigma and ‘conscientious objection’ 29 Linkages between gender, social norms, violence against women and abortion 34 Impact of initiatives to change norms around abortion 37 Conservative ideologies, religious prescriptions, and the legal and policy environment for safe abortion 40 Additional bibliography 46 Annexes 48 3 Abbreviations BCC Behaviour change communication COPUA Coalition for Prevention of Unsafe Abortion (Malawi) CSE Comprehensive sexuality education CUSS Contraceptive Use Stigma Scale DHS Demographic and Health Survey FGD Focus group discussion ICPD International Conference on Population and Development IDI In-depth interview ILASS Individual Level Abortion Stigma Scale
    [Show full text]