Quick viewing(Text Mode)

Math 412, Introduction to Abstract Algebra. Overview of Algebra. A

Math 412, Introduction to Abstract Algebra. Overview of Algebra. A

Math 412, Introduction to abstract .

Overview of algebra.

A study of algebraic objects and functions between them; an algebraic object is typically a with one or more operations which satisfies certain .

Examples: ,eg.R4 Main types of objects for this course: ,eg. Z, the ring of having 2 operations; Mn(R) in which multiplication is not commutative field,eg.Ror Q (a special type of ring; commutative and have multiplicative inverses) ,eg.Z3,S3; 1 operation, commutative or not

Groups have the simplest set of axioms, but are not necessarily the easiest to understand.

Functions between these must preserve the operations: eg., linear transformations on vector spaces. We will have special names for the functions we wish to work with in each case (, iso = equal, , homo = same)

To study such functions, we need to understand the kernels, special subsets which get mapped to zero (nullspaces for vector spaces, ideals for rings, normal subgroups). Chapter 2 of the book is about modular , not because it is interesting in , but because it is closely related to understanding these kernels.

A topic that we will do only a little with (see grad algebra for more) is building new rings/groups out of simpler ones. For example, using Cartesian products (§8.1 for groups). There are a number of standard methods of construction that apply to all types of algebraic objects–this leads to the general idea of theory to do them all at once. Algebraists love to generalize and find common properties in different objects. In fact, if there is one overlying theme in all of algebra, this is it: answering the question “in what way are two different things the same.” Historically (early in the 1900’s) abstract algebra had its beginnings with applications to algebraic , algebraic and , using algebraic ideas to help in understanding more traditional areas in which there were problems of interest to people. Thus abstract algebra played the same role in math that math has played in science, being a tool to organize the ideas.

Where does high school algebra fit in? One generally studies polynomialP expressions in i high school. These are the elements of rings, such as R[x]={ aix |ai ∈R} and will be studied in Chapters 4 and 5. This can also be generalized to in more than one variable, such as R[x, y].

As you go through this semester/year, you should be constantly asking yourselves, “how 1 2 is what I am seeing now like something I have done before?” You should always be trying to understand new definitions (of which there will be a lot) by thinking of examples you are familiar with, as well as why similar constructions are not examples. For example, Z is a , but Mn(R)isnot. Zhas a multiplicative cancellation law, but Mn(R) does not.

Chapter 1, Arithmetic in Z revisited.

Theorem 1.1. ( algorithm) Let a, b be integers with b>0. Then there exist unique integers q, r such that

a = bq + r and 0 ≤ r

Proof. Let S = { a − bx | x ∈ Z,a−bx ≥ 0 } Note that S =6 ∅ since x = −|a| gives

a − bx = a + b|a| = |a|(b  1) ≥ 0 because b ≥ 1.

Use the Well-ordering : every nonempty subset of the set of nonnegative integers contains a smallest element. (See Appendix C.)

This says S has some smallest element r,sayr=a−bq,whereqis the value of x giving r as an element of S.Wenowhavea=bq + r and r ≥ 0. We still need r

Consider the a − b(q + 1). If it is nonnegative, it lies in S; but

a − b(q +1)=a−bq − b = r − b

and r is the smallest element of S. Therefore, r − b = a − b(q +1)<0, so r

Uniqueness: Assume there are (possibly different) numbers q1 and r1 such that a = bq1 + r1 and 0 ≤ r1

bq + r = a = bq1 + r1, so b(q − q1)=r1−r.

This last equality can only hold for 0 ≤ r, r1

This is fundamental to the :

Theorem 1.6. (Euclidean algorithm) Let a, b be positive integers with a ≥ b.Ifb|a,then gcd(a, b)=b. Otherwise, apply the division algorithm repeatedly as follows; there is always an integer t such that rt is the last nonzero remainder in

a = bq0 + r0, 0

Then rt =gcd(a, b).

To understand this, we need some definitions.

Definition, p. 7. Given a, b ∈ Z,b=0,wesay6 bdivides a or b is a divisor or factor of a if there exists c ∈ Z such that a = bc. Notation b|a.

Note that, if a =0,6 |b|≤|a|,andsoahas only finitely many divisors. Examples: a =0,a=6.

Definition, p. 8. common divisor; greatest common divisor (gcd). Write (a, b) or gcd(a, b). We say a and b are relatively prime if (a, b)=1.

Examples: (4, 6) = 2, (5, 9) = 1.

Sketch of proof of Theorem 1.6. The process stops in at most b steps since the ri’s decrease. Check that rt is a common divisor and that any common divisor of a and b must divide rt.  4

A theorem which will be very useful later in studying ideals.

Theorem 1.3. Let a, b ∈ Z,notboth0, and let d =gcd(a, b). Then there exist integers u, v with d = au + bv. Furthermore, d is the smallest positive integer that can be written in the form au + bv.

Proof. The book gives a non-constructive proof, getting existence from the Well-ordering axiom. Another way is to use the Euclidean algorithm:

d = rt = rt−2 − rt−1qt

= rt−2 − (rt−3 − rt−2qt−1)qt = rt−2(1 + qt−1qt) − rt−3 = ···

Replacing each of the ri’s up to r0 = a − bq0 gives an expression of the form au + bv where u and v are combinations of qi’s. Now a = da1 and b = db1 for some a1,b1 so any positive integer of the form au + bv = d(a1u + b1v) ≥ d since a1u + b1v ≥ 1tomaketheau + bv positive. 

Example. Apply the Euclidean Algorithm to 114, 42 to get

6 = gcd(114, 42) = 3 · 114 + (−8) · 42.

This is not unique: for example, we also have 6 = (−4) · 114 + 11 · 42.

Some standard number theory facts:

Corollary 1.4 (the important part). If a, b ∈ Z are not both 0 and c|a and c|b,then c|gcd(a, b).

Proof. Write d =gcd(a, b)=au + bv = ca1u + cb1v = c(a1u + b1v). 

Theorem 1.5. If a|bc and gcd(a, b)=1,thena|c.

Proof. By Theorem 1.3, we can write 1 = au + bv, so (using the hypothesis to write ar = bc), c = cau + cbv = cau + arv = a(cu + rv), and therefore a|c.  5

Definition. An integer p is prime if p =6 1 and the only divisors of p are 1andp.

Note that p =6 0. Comment on 1 (units, p. 60). This will be generalized to arbitrary commutative rings in Chapter 6. (It can be done for noncommutative rings also.) If a number is not 0, 1 and not prime, it is called composite.

Theorem 1.8. Let p ∈ Z,p=06 ,1.Thenpis prime iff p satisfies the property whenever p|bc,thenp|bor p|c.

Proof. (=⇒) Suppose p|bc.Sincepis prime, its divisor gcd(p, b)mustbe1or|p|.Ifitis |p|,thenp|b.Ifitis1,thenp|cby Theorem 1.5.

(⇐=) Let d be a divisor of p,sayp=ds. By hypothesis, p|d or p|s.Ifp|s,says=ps1, then p = ds = pds1,sods1 =1andd=1. Otherwise, p|d and d|p, hence d = p.By definition, p is prime. 

Corollary 1.9. If p is prime and p|a1a2 ···an,thenpdivides at least one of the ai.

Proof. The book’s proof is an informal one. To write it carefully, we need mathematical induction. The statement holds for n = 2 by Theorem 1.8. Assume it is true for n − 1and n≥3. Show it holds for n... 

Theorem 1.11 (Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic). Every integer n =06 ,1can be written as a product of primes. The prime factorization is unique up to rearranging the factors and multiplication of the factors by 1.

Comment on proof by contradiction; i.e., use of the contrapositive to a statement.

Proof. It clearly suffices to prove the theorem for n>1. Assume that some integer cannot be written as a product of primes. Let m be the smallest positive integer that cannot be so written. In particular, m is not prime, so it has positive factors other than 1 and m,saym=ab with 1

Now assume that n has two prime factorizations

n = p1 ···pr =q1 ···qs.

Then p1 divides q1 ···qs, hence by Corollary 1.9, p1 divides some qi; reordering if necessary, we may assume i =1.Butq1 is prime, so p1 = q1. Dividing both sides by q1 gives us

p2(p3 ···pr)=q2···qs. 6

Use the same argument to conclude that (reordering if necessary) p2 = q2. Continue until all the primes are cancelled from one side. For example, if s>r, we end up with

1=qs−r···qs, which is impossible as the qi’s are all prime. Thus we must have r = s and the factorization has the claimed uniqueness. 

Examples. From pages 18-19, do problems 23, 27 (generalizing part (b)), 12(a) (which leads to Chapter 2 work).