Survey of Groundwater Composition in Northern Addison County, VT With

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Survey of Groundwater Composition in Northern Addison County, VT With A SURVEY OF GROUNDWATER COMPOSITION IN NORTHERN ADDISON COUNTY, VERMONT: GEOLOGIC SOURCES OF CONTAMINATION Environmental Studies 360 Spring 2002 Program in Environmental Studies Middlebury College Middlebury, VT 05753 Dr. Peter Ryan, Dr. Stephen Trombulak, and the members of ES 360 (listed in alphabetical order): Lauren Aldrich Ian Ausprey Ben Brower Benjamin Calvi Sarah Groff Caitlin Hicks Katherine Johnston Morley McBride Lee Perlow Molly Yazwinski ii This report was written as part of a research project conducted under the supervision of Dr. Peter Ryan and Dr. Stephen Trombulak for the Middlebury College course entitled "Environmental Science Practicum" (Environmental Studies 360). Copyright of this report and its contents is retained by the Trustees of Middlebury College. Please cite this report as follows: Ryan, P., S. Trombulak, L. Aldrich, I. Ausprey, B. Brower, B. Calvi, S. Groff, C. Hicks, K. Johnston, M. McBride, L. Perlow, and M. Yazwinski. 2002. A survey of groundwater composition in northern Addison County, Vermont: geologic sources of contamination. Environmental Science Practicum research report: Environmental Studies Program, Middlebury College, Middlebury, Vermont. Additional copies of this report can be obtained from the Program in Environmental Studies, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753 (802-443-5710) or by contacting either Dr. Peter Ryan (Department of Geology and Program in Environmental Studies, 802-443-2557, [email protected]) or Dr. Stephen C. Trombulak (Department of Biology and Program in Environmental Studies, 802-443-5439, [email protected]). iii Table of Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 Figure 1. Uranium decay series..................................................................................... 2 Materials and Methods ..................................................................................................... 4 Study areas .................................................................................................................... 4 Sampling........................................................................................................................4 Figure 2A-F. Study locations ...................................................................................5-10 Analysis....................................................................................................................... 11 Table 1. Concentrations of standards .......................................................................... 12 Table 2. Emission wavelengths and ICP detection levels........................................... 12 Results .............................................................................................................................. 13 Within-site variation.................................................................................................... 13 Chemical signatures of locations................................................................................. 13 Table 3. Bedrock signatures........................................................................................ 13 EPA Primary Standards............................................................................................... 14 Uranium (Table 4 and Figure 3) .................................................................14-15 Lead (Table 5 and Figure 4)........................................................................16-17 Copper (Table 6 and Figure 5)......................................................................... 18 Arsenic (Table 7 and Figure 6)......................................................................... 19 Chromium (Table 8 and Figure 7).................................................................... 20 Selenium (Table 9 and Figure 8) ...................................................................... 21 EPA Secondary Standards........................................................................................... 22 Aluminum (Table 10 and Figure 9) .............................................................22-23 Iron (Table 11 and Figure 10).......................................................................... 24 Zinc (Table 12 and Figure 11).......................................................................... 25 Elements without EPA limits ...................................................................................... 26 Calcium (Table 13 and Figure 12) ........................................................................ 26 Cadmium (Table 14 and Figure 13) ...................................................................... 27 Cobalt (Table 15 and Figure 14)........................................................................... 28 Potassium (Table 16 and Figure 15) ..................................................................... 29 Magnesium (Table 17 and Figure 16) ................................................................... 30 Sodium (Table 18 and Figure 17).......................................................................... 31 Nickel (Table 19 and Figure 18)............................................................................ 32 Phosphorus (Table 20 and Figure 19)................................................................... 33 Silicon (Table 21 and Figure 20)........................................................................... 34 Titanium (Table 222 and Figure 21) ..................................................................... 35 Table 23. Summary table ............................................................................................ 36 Discussion......................................................................................................................... 37 Implications for human health..................................................................................... 37 Uranium and other radionuclides ................................................................................ 37 iv Lead............................................................................................................................. 38 Copper, iron, and aluminum........................................................................................ 39 Geologic interpretations of results .............................................................................. 39 Clarendon Springs Formation .............................................................................. 39 Cheshire Quartzite Formation .............................................................................. 40 Discussion of results for other elements ..................................................................... 40 Implications for a predictive model ............................................................................ 41 Recommendations for future studies........................................................................... 41 Sources of error and uncertainty ................................................................................. 42 Conclusion........................................................................................................................ 43 Acknowledgements.......................................................................................................... 43 Literature Cited............................................................................................................... 44 1 Introduction Sources of health risks in water supplies are not always related to human activities. Metals such as arsenic (As), iron (Fe), copper (Cu), lead (Pb), and uranium (U) can originate from natural sources that include the weathering and dissolution of metal- bearing minerals in rocks and the proximity of groundwater to geologic features such as fractures and faults. For instance, surveys of drinking water in New Hampshire found high arsenic levels in the water of bedrock wells situated in Late-Devonian Concord-type granite. Based on a maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 5 parts per billion (ppb), water from 20% of domestic bedrock wells in New Hampshire would be considered to be unsafe for drinking (Peters et al. 1999). Approximately 50% of Vermont homeowners drink water produced from wells drilled into bedrock (Kim, personal communication) and only rarely do homeowners test their water for metals and radioactive elements. Considering that chronic, long-term exposure to some trace metals can cause cancer and organ damage, chemical analysis of water is important, especially in areas with bedrock types known to contain elevated concentrations of trace metals. In this study, we measured the concentration of 19 elements in well water in northern Addison County, Vermont. Of the 19 elements, six are regulated by EPA primary drinking water standards and three are regulated by secondary standards. The health risks from exposure to contaminants was of particular concern in our research because, unlike municipal water supplies, which must pass federal Safe Drinking Water Standards, management and monitoring of private water supplies is voluntary (Swistock et al. 1993). Although it is difficult to prevent natural contamination of groundwater, there are options available to treat contaminated water once elevated levels have been detected. In Vermont’s Champlain Valley, natural contaminants of particular concern are uranium and its radioactive decay products radon and radium. A study in 2001 by the Vermont Department
Recommended publications
  • Municipal Plan for the Town and Village of Ludlow, Vermont
    Municipal Plan For the Town and Village of Ludlow, Vermont Adopted by the Ludlow Village Trustees on October 8, 2019 Adopted by the Ludlow Select Board on October 7, 2019 Ludlow Municipal Plan Adopted October 2019 Adopted by the Ludlow Village Trustees on January 2, 2018 Adopted by the Ludlow Select Board on December 4, 2017 Amended by the Ludlow Select Board on November 7, 2016 Amended by the Ludlow Select Board on August 3, 2015 Amended by the Ludlow Village Trustees on August 4, 2015 Adopted by the Ludlow Select Board on November 5, 2012 Adopted by the Ludlow Village Trustees on March 5, 2013 This Ludlow Municipal Plan was developed in 2018-2019 by the Ludlow Planning Commission with assistance from the Southern Windsor County Regional Planning Commission, Ascutney, VT. Financial support for undertaking this and previous revisions was provided, in part, by a Municipal Planning Grant from the Vermont Agency of Commerce and Community Development. Photo Credits: Many of the pictures found throughout this document were generously provided by Tom Johnson. ii Ludlow Municipal Plan Adopted October 2019 Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Public Process ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.3
    [Show full text]
  • Taconic Physiography
    Bulletin No. 272 ' Series B, Descriptive Geology, 74 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR . UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR 4 t TACONIC PHYSIOGRAPHY BY T. NELSON DALE WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1905 CONTENTS. Page. Letter of transinittal......................................._......--..... 7 Introduction..........I..................................................... 9 Literature...........:.......................... ........................... 9 Land form __._..___.._.___________..___._____......__..__...._..._--..-..... 18 Green Mountain Range ..................... .......................... 18 Taconic Range .............................'............:.............. 19 Transverse valleys._-_-_.-..._.-......-....___-..-___-_....--_.-.._-- 19 Longitudinal valleys ............................................. ^...... 20 Bensselaer Plateau .................................................... 20 Hudson-Champlain valley................ ..-,..-.-.--.----.-..-...... 21 The Taconic landscape..................................................... 21 The lakes............................................................ 22 Topographic types .............,.....:..............'.................... 23 Plateau type ...--....---....-.-.-.-.--....-...... --.---.-.-..-.--... 23 Taconic type ...-..........-........-----............--......----.-.-- 28 Hudson-Champlain type ......................"...............--....... 23 Rock material..........................'.......'..---..-.....-...-.--.-.-. 23 Harder rocks ....---...............-.-.....-.-...--.-.........
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Bristol Outdoor Recreation, Gateway to the Green Mountains Bristol Is in Northeastern Addison County, at the Western
    Town of Bristol Outdoor Recreation, Gateway to the Green Mountains Bristol is in northeastern Addison County, at the western foot of the Green Mountains. The New Haven River flows out of the mountains and through town. Parks • Bristol Town Green- Center of town with a fountain and bandstand. Link for history- Bristol Core • Bristol Veterans Memorial Park- Wooded park with paths across a roaring waterfall. Link for history- Bristol Core • Sycamore Park-A day use recreation area, swimming and fishing. Link for history- Bristol Core • Eagle Park-handicapped access, picnic tables. • Bartlett’s Falls- (New Haven Gorge or known as the Toaster) Waterfalls and slab rocks to lounge on. Biking Bristol is the home of VBT Vermont Bicycle Tour and a stopping way for Sojourn and Backroads bike tours. The mountain biking is being cultivated, there is the VMBA chapter of Addison County Bike Club which has a focus in Middlebury. Most trails in Bristol area are privately owned and maintained. The Watershed Trail link Green Mountain Family Campground map Hinesburg Town Forest trails map (14mi from town) Water Sports Bristol Pond is great for canoeing, Stand Up Paddleboarding, fishing, and kayaking New Haven River is known for white water kayaking and part of the New Haven Ledges Race, bringing kayakers from all over New England to drop over the Bartlett’s Falls. • Baldwin Creek • Bristol Pond (Winona Lake) • Monkton Pond (Cedar Lake) • Lake Dunmore Hiking Bristol is the Gateway into the Green Mountains, there are many trails that surround the town and there are more to come. • Watershed Trail link • Bristol Cliffs map • Coffin Trail – In the development stages link • Trail around Bristol – In the development stages Town of Bristol Outdoor Recreation, Gateway to the Green Mountains Bristol Ledges Trail Round trip hiking distance: 3 miles Difficulty: Easy The Bristol Ledges Trail is the perfect hike for when you’re looking for something short and close by, but with super sweet views.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 the Geology of the Bennington Area
    I S; 5, •-' -"•L - THE GEOLOGY OF THE BENNINGTON AREIA, VERMONT By ItV £ JOHN A MACFAD\ EN, JR t "I VERMON I GEOLOGIC \L SURVEY :• CHARLiS G. DOLL Stale Geologist Published by S S VERMON'! DEVELOPMEf\ t COMMISSION •• MONTPELIER VE! MONT S S S S S • BiLETIN NO. 7 - 1956 S ' S S - THE GEOLOGY OF THE BENNINGTON ARF A, VERMONT By JOHN A. MACFAD\ 1N, JR £ I VERMON I GEOLOGIC 'LL SURVEY CHARLCS G. DOLL State Geologist 4 / • •• • . • • Published by VERMONT DEVELOPMEr''1' COMMISSION MONTPELIER VERIONT I • .BPLLETIN NO. • • • 1956 • •• •. •• eBr.4.n TABLE OF CONI1NTS / ' I PAGE 1 / ABSTRACT ......................... 7 i oRatlsn4 1 INTRODUCTION ........................ 8 0 Location. ......................... PWtney 8 Physiogiaphy and Glaciation ................. 9 Purpose of Study ....................... 11 I / I, Method of Study ...................... 11 I 0.> Regional Geologic Setting .................. 11 Vt. ) N.H. Previous Work ....................... 13 Acknowledgments . I ( 14 I I STRATIGRAPHY ........................ 15 I oManshular 1 General Statement .................... is I' Pre-Cambrian Sequence ......... ' .....16 / Mount Holly Gneiss ..................... 16 So.s.tqa 3r- I. I I Stamford Granite Gneiss................. 17 Lower Cambrian Sequence .................. 17 41 Mendon Formation ................... 17 I • —4 ( Cheshire Quartzite ................... 20 •• #3 Dunham Dolomite ..................... 21 'S Monkton Quartzite .................. 22 ------\-------- Winooski Dolomite ................... 23
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Biophysical Regions and a Landscape Perspective for Conservation and Management
    2. BIOPHYSICAL REGIONS AND A LANDSCAPE PERSPECTIVE FOR CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT ermont is rich with wildlife, largely because we have an abundance As a Vermont and diversity of habitat that supports the needs of many species. landowner, you will VThese habitats include extensive areas of interconnected forests of many types, swamps and lakeside marshes, fens and bogs, cliffs and caves, need to carefully seeps and vernal pools, fields and grasslands, and streams, rivers, and ponds. An important conservation goal is to maintain this diverse array consider the effects of of habitats to continue to support Vermont’s wildlife resources and all the values they provide. your actions and plan Achieving this goal over the long term will be challenging, given the continued loss and degradation of habitat associated with development. for effective habitat As a Vermont landowner, you will need to carefully consider the effects of your actions and plan for effective habitat management and conservation management and on at least three scales. First, you need to consider the needs of individual conservation on at species where they occur, especially those species that are particularly sensitive to changes in their surroundings. For example, American least three scales. woodcock require shrub wetlands for feeding, adjacent to old fields for courtship. Second, you need to consider the distribution and condition of all habitats and natural communities in your local area and across the state. This is the best insurance that you will provide the habitat requirements for a broad range of species. And third, you need to consider large, landscape-scale features, such as large areas of contiguous forest and the habitat that connects them.
    [Show full text]
  • Route 2 • St. Johnsbury, Vermont 802-274-1219
    A1 A2 2 | Summer Fun The Record | 2018 As a GOOD NEIGHBOR boarding student at St. Johnsbury Academy, you can expect no less than a life-changing learning experience. “ What I love most about the Academy is the diverse group of students in the boarding community and the friendships “ I love the Academy because I have developed there.” it has given me so many “ Living on campus full-time opportunities to learn Sam C. was a life-changing experience Academy boarding student and explore.” for me!” from Lyme, New Hampshire Oshun S. Alison R. Academy boarding student Academy boarding student from Montgomery Center, from Montpelier, Vermont Vermont We are SJA. An independent, coeducational, boarding and day school for grades 9-12 and postgraduate year located in St. Johnsbury, Vermont. Our GOOD NEIGHBOR boarding for students from Vermont, Learn more at: program reduces tuition New Hampshire, and Quebec. stjacademy.org/neighbor A3 The Record | 2018 Summer Fun | 3 Inside The ‘County’ Fair Necessities 5 This Year’s Fair Schedule 6 An Uphill Battle 8 Other Suggested Hiking Trails 9 Farmers’ Markets & Things To Do 12 Crossing The Line At The Haskell 18 33 Other Cultural Institutions 20 Sounds Of Summer 21 PUBLISHER Todd M. Smith Hills Are Alive At Dog Mountain 24 — 5 Area Arts Venues 26 EDITOR ADVERTISING Enjoy A Current Event By Canoe 27 Leah Carey SALES Area Swimming Holes 29 — Julie Poutre, 24 LAYOUT Brooke Dolloff, The Region’s Golf Coures 33 Andrew McGregor Glen Jardine, — Sylvie Weber COVER DESIGN — Glen Jardine ADVERTISING 27 — DESIGN & COVER PHOTO PRODUCTION Paul Hayes Jeana Desilets CONTACT US Advertising: [email protected] News: [email protected] Phone: 802-748-8121 Web: caledonianrecord.com A PUBLICATION OF THE CALEDONIAN-RECORD On the Cover: Lily Farr, right, and Saffron attend the Levitt AMP St.
    [Show full text]
  • APPALACHIAN WORKSHOP Lkmf
    G-o9Q eA-w- JQA—vii: Gioj"- kj tzb 4s• IØ So APPALACHIAN WORKSHOP lKMF JNtSTY OF Vth1Oft1T LTOft VT I2;LoXPiItti ir QUEBEC VEROT APPALACHIAN WORKS+OP Apr11 14 - 16, 1989 Kalkin Hall, University of Vermont Burlington, Vermont Co-Sponsored by: The Department of Geology Visiting Lecture Series The Canadian Studies Program The Graduate College, University of Vermont EDITORS Maurice Coipron and Barr,' Doolan Department of Geology • University of Vermont Burlington, Vermont Cover: Perspective block diagram of the Québec- Vermont Orogen (from Dóolan, 1989; see Doolan, this volume). Additional copies are available upon request from: Vermont Geological Society, Inc. P.O. Box 304 twfontpelier, Vermont 05602 PROGRAM AND CONTENTS SATURDA V. APRIL 15, 1989 8:00 - INTRODUCTORY REMARKS I. EVOLUTION OF THE ANCIENT NORTH AMERICAN MARGIN IN THE QUEBEC REENTRANT ............................................................................. 1 Chairperson: Charles A. Ratté 8:15 - Stephen Kumarapeli* and Hillar Pintson: Geochronologic constraints on the timing of rifting and continental breakup at the Sutton Mountains triple junction...........3 8:40 - William M. Dowling: Paleogeographic analysis of the preshelf facies in the Oak Hill and Camels Hump Groups: constraints on syn-rift and post-break-up subsidence in theQuébecreentrant ...........................................................................................................5 9:05 - Charlotte Mehrtens: The Cambrian platform and platform margin in northwestern Vermont..............................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Trip I DEGLACIAL HISTORY of the LAKE CHAMPLAIN-LAKE GEORGE
    163 . Trip I DEGLACIAL HISTORY OF THE LAKE CHAMPLAIN-LAKE GEORGE LOWLAND by G. Gordon Connally Lafayette College Easton, Pennsylvania and Leslie A. Sirkin Adelphi University Garden City, New York GENERAL GEOMORPHOLOGY The Lake Champlain and Lake George Valleys are two separate physiographic units, situated in separate physiographic provinces (see Broughton, et al., 1966). The Champlain Valley lies in the St. Lawrence-Champlain Lowlands while the Lake George trough lies in the Adirondack Highlands. It is the continuous nature of the deglacial history of the two regions that links them together for this field trip. Indeed, the deglacial history of the regions begins at the north end of the Hudson-Mohawk Lowlands near Glens Falls, New York. Physiography The Champlain Valley lies between the Adirondack Mountains of New York on the west and the Green Mountains of Vermont on the east. Lake Champlain occupies most of the valley bottom and has a surface elevation of about 95 feet. The Great Chazy, Saranac, Ausable, and Bouquet Rivers enter the valley from the Adirondacks while the Mississquoi, Lamoille, and Winooski Rivers and Otter Creek enter from the Green Mountains. Figure 1 shows the general physiography and the field trip stops. According to Newland and Vaughan (1942) Lake George occupies a graben in the eastern Adirondacks. The'surface of Lake George is about 320 feet above sea level and it drains into Lake Cham­ plain via Ticonderoga Creek at its northern end. In general, Lake George marks the divide between southerly flowing Hudson River drainage and northerly flowing St. Lawrence River drainage. 164 Great Chazy Lamoille R.
    [Show full text]
  • OROGRAPHY 9 and Covered with a Coating of Clay Which Smoothed Over Its Inequalities and Concealed Most of the Underlying Rocks
    OROGRAPHY 9 and covered with a coating of clay which smoothed over its inequalities and concealed most of the underlying rocks. Since its emergence the surface has been but slightly altered by drainage channels cut across it. Orographical maps of Eastern and Western Canada, showing elevations above sea-level, will be found on pages 8 and 10 of this1 volume. Canadian Shield.—The portion of the Precambrian continent whose exposed surface still forms a large part of Canada has an area of about two and a half million square miles. Its northern border crosses the Arctic archipelago and the eastern lies beyond Baffin island and Labrador and reaches the depressed area occupied by the St. Lawrence river, a short spur or point crossing this valley at the outlet of lake Ontario to join the Adirondack mountains in New York. The southern boundary runs from the spur west to Georgian bay, skirts the north shore of lake Huron and sweeps almost around the ancient depressed area occupied by lake Superior. The western edge, from the lake of the Woods and lake Winnipeg, bears northwest to the western end of lake Athabaska, and passes through the basins occupied by Great Slave and Great Bear lakes, reaching the Arctic ocean east of the Mackenzie River delta. In detail, the surface features of the Canadian Shield are irregular; but, viewed broadly, it has the conforma­ tion of a great plain, depressed toward the centre and in the north, and slightly elevated along the eastern and southern borders, where it presents a rather steep outward slope.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Hiking Capital of Southern Vermont
    A guide to the Hiking Capital of Southern Vermont 1 Introduction Welcome to Mendon, known throughout Vermont as the “Gateway to the Green Mountains.” Mendon is blessed with the best mountain scenery in southern Vermont. Killington Peak (Vermont’s second highest summit), Mendon Peak (the highest summit in Vermont without a marked trail to the top), Blue Ridge (overlooking the Otter Creek Valley) and Bald Mountain and East Mountain (both overlooking Rutland City and beyond) are all within our town boundary. Nearby Pico Peak further adds to the dramatic mountain skyline that we all enjoy. Over 90% of our town is forested and over 50% is protected in the Green Mountain National Forest, three Vermont State forests (Coolidge, Aitken and Jeffords) and the Rutland City forest. Hiking trails abound in Mendon, from the world-famous Long Trail/Appalachian Trail corridor to casual saunters like the Tamarack Notch loop to opportunities for bushwhacking up untrammeled summits like Mendon Peak. You can understand why we proclaim Mendon to be the hiking capital of southern Vermont. This ”Hike Mendon” trail guide is your ticket to mountain adventure. It is not intended as a comprehensive tenth-of-a-mile by tenth-of-a-mile trail guide. You will not find GPS coordinates anywhere. Many sources available in print and on-line do all that very well. Rather it is a guidebook that will help you find trail heads, alert you to where the trail goes left or right or straight up and what to expect in different seasons, including winter. There are also sections on hiking our snowmobile and back country ski trails and descriptions on where to start your bushwhack for those trail-less summits.
    [Show full text]
  • Brochure Cover
    800 North St, Middletown Springs, VT Curtis Trousdale, Owner, Broker, Realtor Cell: 802-233-5589 [email protected] 2004 Williston Road, South Burlington VT 05403 | www.preferredpropertiesvt.com | Phone: (802) 862-9106 | Fax: (802) 862-6266 Additional Property Information 800 North St, Middletown Springs, VT 05757 Utilities: Power: The seller has made a considerable investment to bring power up North St to the southern border of the property. The service provider is Green Mountain Power. Phone/TV/ Internet: Service Provider: VTel. Service has not yet been brought to property and is roughly estimated to be 2700 feet away. Power poles are in place for an easier future connection. VTel provides phone, high speed internet, and cable TV. Septic: No septic soil testing has been completed on property at this time. Water: A drilled well would be typical for this area. Taxes: Middletown Springs: $3,725.56 (2014-14 Non-Homestead Rate) Property is not in Current Use to allow more freedom for the logging operation. Seller knows of no reason why they property could not be enrolled in the Current Use tax reduction program. Address: The listing address is created for GPS purposes only. A 911 address will be provided by the town upon development. Zoning: There are no zoning regulations in Middletown Springs. Features: Road: North St accesses the property from the south through Middletown Springs. Middletown Hill Rd accesses the property from the northeast through the town of Ira. Both roads heading toward the property are year round and town maintained for full time residents. However, the portions nearing the property and bordering the property are consider Class 4 and are not maintained or plowed by the towns.
    [Show full text]
  • The Green Mountain Anticlinorium in the Vicinity of Wilmington and Woodford Vermont
    THE GREEN MOUNTAIN ANTICLINORIUM IN THE VICINITY OF WILMINGTON AND WOODFORD VERMONT By JAMES WILLIAM SKEHAN, S. J. VERMONT GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES G. DOLL, Stale Geologist Published by VERMONT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MONTPELIER, VERMONT BULLETIN NO. 17 1961 = 0 0. Looking northwest from centra' \Vhitingham, from a point near C in WHITINCHAM IPlate 1 Looking across Sadawga Pond Dome to Haystack Mountain-Searsburg Ridge in the background; Stratton and Glastenburv Mountains in the far distance. Davidson Cemetery in center foreground on Route 8 serves as point of reference. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE ABSTRACT 9 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Location ........................ 10 Regional Geologic Setting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Previous Geologic Work ................. 15 The Problem ...................... 16 Present Investigation ................... 18 Acknowledgments .................... 19 Topography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Rock Exposure ..................... 20 Culture and Accessibility ................. 20 STRATIGRAPHY AND LITHOLOGY ............... 23 General Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Stratigraphic Nomenclature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Lithologic Nomenclature ................. 26 Pre-Cambrian Rocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 General Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Mount Holly Complex ................. 28 Stamford
    [Show full text]