DOCSLIB.ORG

The Green Mountain Anticlinorium in the Vicinity of Wilmington and Woodford Vermont

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Green Mountain Anticlinorium in the Vicinity of Wilmington and Woodford Vermont THE GREEN MOUNTAIN ANTICLINORIUM IN THE VICINITY OF WILMINGTON AND WOODFORD VERMONT By JAMES WILLIAM SKEHAN, S. J. VERMONT GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES G. DOLL, Stale Geologist Published by VERMONT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MONTPELIER, VERMONT BULLETIN NO. 17 1961 = 0 0. Looking northwest from centra' \Vhitingham, from a point near C in WHITINCHAM IPlate 1 Looking across Sadawga Pond Dome to Haystack Mountain-Searsburg Ridge in the background; Stratton and Glastenburv Mountains in the far distance. Davidson Cemetery in center foreground on Route 8 serves as point of reference. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE ABSTRACT 9 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Location ........................ 10 Regional Geologic Setting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Previous Geologic Work ................. 15 The Problem ...................... 16 Present Investigation ................... 18 Acknowledgments .................... 19 Topography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Rock Exposure ..................... 20 Culture and Accessibility ................. 20 STRATIGRAPHY AND LITHOLOGY ............... 23 General Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Stratigraphic Nomenclature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Lithologic Nomenclature ................. 26 Pre-Cambrian Rocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 General Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Mount Holly Complex ................. 28 Stamford Granite Gneiss ................ 35 Wilmington Gneiss .................. 37 Readsboro Formation ................. 45 Searshurg Conglomerate Member ........... 45 Rcadsboro Schist .................. 49 Sherman Marble Member . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 Heartwellville Schist ...................57 Paleozoic Rocks ..................... 62 General Statement .................. 62 Cambrian and/or Ordovician Rocks ............ 65 Tyson Formation ................... 65 Hoosac Formation ................... 66 Turkey Mountain Member of Hoosac Formation 72 Mendon Formation and Cheshire Quartzite ........ 75 Pinney Hollow Formation ............... 76 Chester Amphiholite .................. 80 Ottauquechee Formation ................ 82 Ordovician Rocks .................... 85 Stowe Formation ................... 85 More town Formation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 Cram Hill Formation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 Siluro-Devonian Rocks 96 Northheld Slate .................... 96 Unstratified Rocks ................... 99 Ultramafic Rocks . . ................ 99 General Statement .................. 99 East Dover Ultramafic ................ 99 Other Ultramafic Rocks ............... 102 ['egmatites and Veins ................. 102 Mafic and Felsic I)ikes ................. 103 STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY ................... 103 Major Structures .................... 103 General Statement .................. 103 Simple Anticlines and Synclines ............. 105 General Statement ................. 105 Readshoro Anticline ................. 105 Sherman Anticline .................. 106 Whitingham Anticline ................ 107 Folds of the Central Green Mountains ......... 107 Heartwellville Syncline ................ 107 Sumner Brook Syncline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 Flaystack Mountain Anticlinc ............. 108 Mount Snow Anticline ................ 108 Somerset Anticline ................. 109 Wilmington Anticline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 Flogback Mountain Syncline ............. 110 Other Anticlinal and Synclinal Folds .......... 110 Domes of the Wilmington-Woodford Area ......... 110 Sadawga Pond Dome . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 Lake Rayponda Dome ................ 111 Minor Structures and their Relation to the Major Structures 112 Structural Features Associated with Folds ....... 112 Lineation ...................... 118 General Statement .................. 118 Orientation and Lineation of Quartz Rods ....... 119 Pebble Orientation and Lineation ........... 121 Mineral Streaming ................. 122 Boudinage ..................... 122 Cleavage ....................... 124 joints and Quartz Veins ................ 127 Summary of Relationships of Minor to Major Structures 128 Origin of the Simple Anticlines and Domes ........ 130 METAMORPHISM 130 General Statement 130 Metamorphic Zones ................... 131 Method of Study .................... 133 Metamorphism of Argillaceous Rocks . . . . . . . . . . 137 Metamorphism of Carbonate Rocks ............ 138 Metamorphism of Mafic Rocks .............. 139 Metamorphism of Ultramafic Rocks ............ 139 Retrograde Metamorphism ................ 143 PRE-METAMORPHIC NATURE OF THE ROCKS .......... 144 Geologic History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144 ECONOMIC GEOLOGY .................... 147 Iron Mines ....................... 147 Other Mines ...................... 147 Marble Quarries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148 Ultramafic Rocks .................... 148 Sand and Gravel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148 Crushed Rock and Concrete Aggregate ........... 149 MAJOR PROBLEMS ..................... 149 Origin of I)ornes .................... 149 Roots of the Taconic Klippe ............... 151 SUGGESTED FUTURE INVESTIGATIONS IN THE WILMINGTON-WOODFORD AREA .............. 153 BIBLIOGRAPHY ...................... 155 Illustrations PA GE Frontispiece . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 FIGURE 1. Index to Geologic Mapping in Southern Vermont and adjacent areas ......................... 11 2. Map showing Major Structures of Southern Vermont and their relationship to the Wilmington-Woodford area ....... 14 3. Haystack Mountain as seen from South Road, north of Bond Brook ........................ 21 4A. View looking NNW from crest of Mount Snow (Pisgah) toward Stratton Mountain ............... 22 4B. View of Haystack Mountain looking NNW across Harriman Reservoir from 3z mile NE of Reservoir Spillway ..... 22 5. Columnar section of the Wilmington-Woodford Area . . . 24 6. Highly contorted plagioclase gneisses, Molly Stark Trail, Dunville Hollow, Woodford ............... 30 7. Faulted plagioclase gneiss, Molly Stark Trail, I)unville Hollow, Woodford ................... 32 8. Gneiss- and microcline-pebble conglomerate, Castle Brook, Somerset ....................... 36 9. Recumbent Spruce-Tree fold in Wilmington gneiss in Sadawga Pond dome ...................... 42 10. Recumbent folds on southeast limb of the Sadawga Pond dome 43 11. Spruce-Tree folds in Wilmington gneiss .......... 44 12. Overturned folds in plagioclase gneiss beds of the Wilmington gneisses ........................ 44 13. Searshurg conglomerate outcrop ............. 46 14. Closeup of Searshurg conglomerate outcrop ........ 47 15. Green chlorite-garnet-quartz of lower part of Neartwellville schist ........................ 58 16. Typical appearance of dark graphite-muscovite-chlorite-garnet lensed Heartwellville schist at type locality ........ 60 17. \Tiew from North of Molly Stark Trail, Wilmington, to Freezing Knolls .................... 62 18. Closeup view of Tyson conglomerate, western Wilmington 67 19. Chester amphiholite northerly sloping surface, Hoslev Hill, Jacksonville; looking southwesterly ........... 80 20. Northeasterly plunging fold in the Chester amphibolite near the axis of Mt. Olga syncline, Sky View, Route 9, Floghack Mountain in Marlboro township ............. 81 21. Well -handed epidote-ankerite-actinol ite aniphiholite of Chester imphiholite, Route 9, Hogback Mountain ........ 82 22. Closeup of bedding of highly contorted Chester amphiholite, Sky View, Hoghack Mountain, Route 9, Marlboro ..... 83 23. I hotomicrograph of Chester amphiholite, Sky \'iew, Iloghack Mountain, Route 9, Marlboro . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 24. Highly contorted chlorite-garnet schist and amphibolite of the Stowe formation, Route 9, Hogback Mountain, Marlboro. 85 25. Amphiholite at top of the Stowe formation showing small fault and relative movement ................. 86 26. Outcrop area of Moretown formation looking N NE from Molly Stark Trail, one mile vest of Wilmington-Brattleboro quadrangle boundary .................. 89 27. Boudinage structure in amphiholite beds of the Cram I fill formation ....................... 95 28. 1 )iagrammatic cross-section of Sadawga I ond dome showing minor folds and inferred directions of movement ...... 104 29. Diagrammatic cross-section of Sadawga Pond dome showing Spruce-Tree folds and inferred directions of movement . . . 105 30. Major structures of Wilmington-Woodford area ...... 106 31. Block diagram of minor structural features of Sadawga Pond dome associated with gently plunging Spruce-Tree folds 111 32. Block diagram of minor structural features of Sadawga Pond dome associated with steeply plunging Spruce-Tree folds 111 33. Doubly plunging anticline in plan view .......... 112 34. Spruce-Tree dome in plan view ............. 113 35. Structural symbol for strike and dip of bedding, pattern of fold, and attitude of fold axis .............. 114 36. Structural symbol showing combined strike and dip of bedding, pattern of fold, and attitude of axial plane and fold axis. . 115 37. Diagrammatic cross-section through an overturned anticline shows relation of dip of axial plane to that of beds . . . . . 116 38. Block diagram
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Poster Final
    Evidence for polyphase deformation in the mylonitic zones bounding the Chester and Athens Domes, in southeastern Vermont, from 40Ar/39Ar geochronology Schnalzer, K., Webb, L., McCarthy, K., University of Vermont Department of Geology, Burlington Vermont, USA CLM 40 39 Sample Mineral Assemblage Metamorphic Facies Abstract Microstructure and Ar/ Ar Geochronology 18CD08A Quartz, Muscovite, Biotite, Feldspar, Epidote Upper Greenschist to Lower Amphibolite The Chester and Athens Domes are a composite mantled gneiss QC Twelve samples were collected during the fall of 2018 from the shear zones bounding the Chester and Athens Domes for 18CD08B Quartz, Biotite, Feldspar, Amphibole Amphibolite Facies 18CD08C Quartz, Muscovite, Biotite, Feldspar, Epidote Upper Greenschist to Lower Amphibolite dome in southeast Vermont. While debate persists regarding Me 40 39 microstructural analysis and Ar/ Ar age dating. These samples were divided between two transects, one in the northeastern 18CD08D Quartz, Muscovite, Biotite, Feldspar, Garnet Upper Greenschist to Lower Amphibolite the mechanisms of dome formation, most workers consider the VT NH section of the Chester dome and the second in the southern section of the Athens dome. These samples were analyzed by X-ray 18CD08E Quartz, Muscovite Greenschist Facies domes to have formed during the Acadian Orogeny. This study diraction in the fall of 2018. Oriented, orthogonal thin sections were also prepared for each of the twelve samples. The thin sec- 18CD09A Quartz, Amphibole Amphib olite Facies 40 CVGT integrates the results of Ar/Ar step-heating of single mineral NY tions named with an “X” were cut parallel to the stretching lineation (X) and normal to the foliation (Z) whereas the thin sections 18CD09B Quartz, Biotite, Feldspar, Amphibole, Muscovite Amphibolite Facies grains, or small multigrain aliquots, with data from microstruc- 18CD09C Quartz, Amphibole, Feldspar Amphibolite Facies named with a “Y” have been cut perpendicular to the ‘X-Z’ thin section.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Sunderland, 1899; History of Sunderland, Vol
    TOWN OF SUNDERLAND - A BRIEF HISTORY Sunderland, Massachusetts, is one of the southernmost towns in Franklin County. The community is situated in the eastern portion of the Connecticut River Valley in western Massachusetts. Sunderland was incorporated as a town in 1718. Before being incorporated, Sunderland was known as Swampfield, so named by its first settlers because of the swampland within the town. Settlement of the town originated on what is now North and South Main Streets, with forty designated house lots. Settlers were also assigned an equal percentage of swampland, pasture land, and wood lots. North and South Main Streets are scenic, broad avenues that appeal to our sensor of what a small New England town should be. In the late 1820’s, maple trees were planted on each side of the street, which has added to Sunderland’s beauty, especially as leaves change color, or after a snowfall. The houses are a pleasing mix of sizes and styles; in fact, Sunderland’s main street has examples of most of the architectural styles of the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries. Mount Toby range is another source of beauty and historic background. A watchtower is at the peak along with a commanding view of the river valley. The north part of Mt. Toby is the home of the “Sunderland Cave.” It is not technically a cave, but huge slabs of tipped conglomerate rock. Caves are rare in this part of New England, which has made this one more widely known. Sunderland’s first Irish immigrants located their homes on Mt. Toby in the mid-nineteenth century, which were known as “paddy farms.” Trails are still evident, along with old stone walls marking boundary lines.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcanada Hydro Northeast Inc. Deerfield River Project (Lp 2323)
    TRANSCANADA HYDRO NORTHEAST INC. DEERFIELD RIVER PROJECT (LP 2323) LOW IMPACT HYDROPOWER CERTIFICATION APPLICATION ATTACHMENT C PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project Overview TransCanada Hydro Northeast, Inc. (the Company) owns and operates the Deerfield River Project (the Project) on the Deerfield River, a major tributary to the Connecticut River. The Project is located in Bennington and Windham Counties in Vermont, and in Berkshire and Franklin Counties in Massachusetts. It consists of eight developments: Somerset, Searsburg, Harriman, Sherman, Deerfield No. 5, Deerfield No. 4, Deerfield No. 3 and Deerfield No.2, having a total installed capacity of 86 megawatts (MW). All dam operations and generation operations are controlled remotely from the Deerfield River Control Center in Monroe Bridge Massachusetts, located near the Deerfield No. 5 Dam. The Project area encompasses about a 65-mile reach of the river, including reservoirs. Two other developments not owned by the company are also located within this area. They are Brookfield Renewable Power’s Bear Swamp Project located downstream of the Deerfield No. 5 development; and Consolidated Edison’s Gardner Falls Project located downstream of the Deerfield No. 3 development. Exhibit 1 depicts the general Project area. Settlement Agreement The Deerfield River Project was one of the first FERC Projects to be relicensed under a comprehensive Settlement Agreement approach executed in 1994. A five-year cooperative consultation process involving state and federal resource agencies, various non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and the licensee (at that time New England Power Company) resulted in settlement by the parties. The process of reaching this agreement included examination of the power and non-power tradeoffs and effects of a wide variety of operational scenarios.
    [Show full text]
  • Sedimentary Record of Cretaceous And
    SEDIMENT AR Y RECORD OF CRETACEOUS AND TER TIAR Y SALT MOVEMENT, EAST TEXAS BASIN: TIMES, RATES, AND LUMES OF SALT FLOW, IMPLICATIONS TO NUCLEAR-WA TE ISOLATION AND PETROLEUM EXPLO ATION by Steven J. Seni and M. P. A. ackson This work was supported by U.S. Depart ent of Energy and funded under Contract No. DE-AC 7-80ET46617 CONTENTS ABSTRACT . • 00 INTRODUCTION. • 00 Data Base. • 00 Early History of Basin Formation and Infilling • 00 Geometry of Salt Structures • 00 EVOLUTIONARY STAGES OF DOME GROWTH. • 00 Pillow Stage . • 00 Geometry of Overlying Strata . • 00 Geometry of Surrounding Strata • 00 Depositional Facies and Lithostratigraph • 00 Diapir Stage • • 00 Geometry of Surrounding Strata • 00 Depositional Facies and Lithostratigraph • 00 Post-Diapir Stage • 00 Geometry of Surrounding Strata • 00 Depositional Facies and Lithostratigraphy • 00 Holocene Analogues. • 00 Discussion • 00 Significance to Subtle Petroleum Traps • 00 PATTERNS OF SALT MOVEMENT IN TIME AND SPAC • 00 Group 1: Pre-Glen Rose Subgroup (pre-112 Ma) - Periphery of Diapir Province • • 00 Group 2: Glen Rose Subgroup to Washita Group 112 to 98 Ma)-­ Basin Axis • 00 Group 3: Post-Austin Group (86 to 56 Ma) -- Per phery of Diapir Province • • 00 Initiation and Acceleration of Salt Flow • • 00 Overview of Dome History • • 00 RATES OF SALT MOVEMENT AND DOME GROWTH • • 00 Assumptions • • 00 Proven Propositions. • 00 Unproven Propositions • 00 Incorrect Propositions • • 00 Distinguishing Between Syndepositional and Post-D positional Thickness Variations. • 00 The Problem • • 00 Structural Evidence • • 00 Sedimentological Evidence • • 00 Methodology • • 00 Distinguishing Between Regional and Salt-Re ated Thickness Variations. • 00 Volume of Salt Mobilized and Estimates of S t Loss • 00 Rates of Dome Growth • • 00 Net Rates of Pillow Growth • 00 Net Rates of Diapir Growth • 00 Gross Rates of Diapir Growth • • 00 Growth Rates and Strain Rates • 00 IMPLICA TIONS TO WASTE ISOLATION • • 00 CONCLUSIONS • • 00 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS • • 00 REFERENCES • 00 APPENDICES • 00 Figures 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecoregions of New England Forested Land Cover, Nutrient-Poor Frigid and Cryic Soils (Mostly Spodosols), and Numerous High-Gradient Streams and Glacial Lakes
    58. Northeastern Highlands The Northeastern Highlands ecoregion covers most of the northern and mountainous parts of New England as well as the Adirondacks in New York. It is a relatively sparsely populated region compared to adjacent regions, and is characterized by hills and mountains, a mostly Ecoregions of New England forested land cover, nutrient-poor frigid and cryic soils (mostly Spodosols), and numerous high-gradient streams and glacial lakes. Forest vegetation is somewhat transitional between the boreal regions to the north in Canada and the broadleaf deciduous forests to the south. Typical forest types include northern hardwoods (maple-beech-birch), northern hardwoods/spruce, and northeastern spruce-fir forests. Recreation, tourism, and forestry are primary land uses. Farm-to-forest conversion began in the 19th century and continues today. In spite of this trend, Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, and 5 level III ecoregions and 40 level IV ecoregions in the New England states and many Commission for Environmental Cooperation Working Group, 1997, Ecological regions of North America – toward a common perspective: Montreal, Commission for Environmental Cooperation, 71 p. alluvial valleys, glacial lake basins, and areas of limestone-derived soils are still farmed for dairy products, forage crops, apples, and potatoes. In addition to the timber industry, recreational homes and associated lodging and services sustain the forested regions economically, but quantity of environmental resources; they are designed to serve as a spatial framework for continue into ecologically similar parts of adjacent states or provinces. they also create development pressure that threatens to change the pastoral character of the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Influences of Surface Processes on Fold Growth During 3D Detachment
    PUBLICATIONS Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems RESEARCH ARTICLE Influences of surface processes on fold growth during 3-D 10.1002/2014GC005450 detachment folding Key Point: M. Collignon1, B. J. P. Kaus2, D. A. May3, and N. Fernandez2 Influences of surface processes on the fold pattern in fold-and-thrust 1Geological Institute, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 2Institut fur€ Geowissenschaften, Johannes Gutenberg-Universit€at, belts Mainz, Germany, 3Institute of Geophysics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland Correspondence to: M. Collignon, Abstract In order to understand the interactions between surface processes and multilayer folding sys- [email protected] tems, we here present fully coupled three-dimensional numerical simulations. The mechanical model repre- sents a sedimentary cover with internal weak layers, detached over a much weaker basal layer representing Citation: salt or evaporites. Applying compression in one direction results in a series of three-dimensional buckle folds, Collignon, M., B. J. P. Kaus, D. A. May, and N. Fernandez (2014), Influences of of which the topographic expression consists of anticlines and synclines. This topography is modified through surface processes on fold growth time by mass redistribution, which is achieved by a combination of fluvial and hillslope erosion, as well as during 3-D detachment folding, deposition, and which can in return influence the subsequent deformation. Model results show that surface Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 15, doi:10.1002/2014GC005450. processes do not have a significant influence on folding patterns and aspect ratio of the folds. Nevertheless, erosion reduces the amount of shortening required to initiate folding and increases the exhumation rates. Received 9 JUN 2014 Increased sedimentation in the synclines contributes to this effect by amplifying the fold growth rate by grav- Accepted 29 JUL 2014 ity.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Industries and Geology of Certain Areas
    REPORT -->/ OF TFIE STATE GEOLOGIST ON THE S 7 (9 Mineral Industries and Geology 12 of Certain Areas OF -o VERMONT. 'I 6 '4 4 7 THIRD OF THIS SERIES, 1901-1902. 4 0 4 S GEORGE H. PERKINS, Ph. D., 2 5 State Geologist and Professor of Geology, University of Vermont 7 8 9 0 2 4 9 1 T. B. LYON C0MI'ANV, I'RINTERS, ALILiNY, New VORK. 1902. CONTENTS. PG K 1NTRODFCTION 5 SKETCH OF THE LIFE OF ZADOCK THOMPSON, G. H. Perkins ----------------- 7 LIST OF OFFICIAL REPORTS ON VERMONT GEOLOGY ----------------- -- -- ----- 14 LIST OF OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON VERMONT GEOLOGY ------- - ---------- ----- 19 SKETCH OF THE LIFE OF AUGUSTUS WING, H. M. Seely -------------------- -- 22 REPORT ON MINERAL INDUSTRIES, G. H. Perkins ............................ 35 Metallic Products ------------------------------------------------------ 32 U seful Minerals ------------------------------------------------------- 35 Building and Ornamental Stone ----------------------------------------- 40 THE GRANITE AREA OF BAItRE, G. I. Finlay------------------------------ --- 46 Topography and Surface Geology ------------------------------------ - -- 46 General Geology, Petrography of the Schists -------------------------- - -- 48 Description and Petrography of Granite Areas ----------------------------51 THE TERRANES OF ORANGE COUNTY, VERMONT, C. H. Richardson ------------ 6i Topography---------------------------- -............................. 6z Chemistry ------------------------------------------------------------66 Geology --------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Periodic Report to the Massachusetts Department of Conservation And
    Periodic Report to the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation Submitted by Friends of Mohawk Trail State Forest Robert T. Leverett Gary A. Beluzo And Anthony W. D’Amato May 21, 2006 Friends of Mohawk Trail State Forest 52 Fairfield Avenue Holyoke, MA 01040 (413) 538-8631 [email protected] 1 Table of Contents Topic Page General Introduction 3 SECTION 1: Old Growth Inventory and Mapping 4 SECTION 2: Forest Reserve 8 SECTION 3: Update on Rucker Indexing Analysis 11 and Exemplary Forest Documentation SECTION 4: White Pine Volume Modeling, 31 Individual Profiles, and White pine Tree Dimensions Index (TDI) Lists SECTION 5: White Pine Stand Tagging, Inventorying, 47 and Growth Analysis SECTION 6: Activities and History of FMTSF 49 SECTION 7: Dendromorphometry 53 SECTION 8: Summary of Exemplary Trees and 56 Forest Features in MTSF and MSF Appendix I: Maps – Recommended Forest Reserves 60 2 General Introduction This report is presented to the Chief Forester for Massachusetts, James DiMaio; the Region 5 Supervisor, Robert Mellace; and the management forester within Region 5, Thomas Byron. Friends of Mohawk Trail State Forest (FMTSF) will also present copies of this report to the Eastern Native Tree Society (ENTS), Harvard Forest for inclusion in their archives, the Massachusetts Audubon Society, Board members of the FMTSF, and Dr. Lee Frelich, Director for the Center of Hardwood Ecology of the University of Minnesota. ENTS, Mass Audubon, Dr. David Orwig of Harvard Forest, and Dr. Lee Frelich have been important contributors to the research described in this report. On February 5, 2004, “Report on Forest Research at Mohawk Trail State Forest” was submitted to the then Department of Environmental Management (DEM) through William Rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Deerfield and CT River Project History.Pmd
    HISTORY OF HYDROELECTRIC DEVELOPMENT ON THE CONNECTICUT AND DEERFIELD RIVERS HISTORY OF HYDROELECTRIC DEVELOPMENT ON THE CONNECTICUT AND DEERFIELD RIVERS INTRODUCTION increasingly complex. While the Depression limited further growth of the industry, a new era emerged In 1903, Malcolm Greene Chace (1875-1955) and after World War II, with streamlined management Henry Ingraham Harriman (1872-1950) established structures and increased regulations and Chace & Harriman, a company that, in its many government involvement (Cook 1991:4; Landry and incarnations over the course of the following Cruikshank 1996:2-5). The first of the 14 decades, grew into one of the largest electric utility hydroelectric facilities built on the Connecticut and companies in New England. The company built a Deerfield rivers by Chace & Harriman and its series of hydroelectric facilities on the Connecticut successors were developed in the early 1900s, and Deerfield rivers in Vermont, New Hampshire shortly after the potential of hydroelectric power and western Massachusetts, which were intended was realized on a large scale. Subsequent facilities to provide a reliable and less expensive alternative were constructed during the maturation of the to coal-produced steam power. Designed primarily industry in the 1920s, and two of the stations were to serve industrial centers in Massachusetts and completed in the post-World War II era. The history Rhode Island, the facilities also provided power to of the companies that built these stations is residential customers and municipalities in New intrinsically linked with broader trends in the history England. Chace & Harriman eventually evolved of electricity, hydropower technology, and industrial into the New England Power Association (NEPA) architecture in America.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Plan for the Town and Village of Ludlow, Vermont
    Municipal Plan For the Town and Village of Ludlow, Vermont Adopted by the Ludlow Village Trustees on October 8, 2019 Adopted by the Ludlow Select Board on October 7, 2019 Ludlow Municipal Plan Adopted October 2019 Adopted by the Ludlow Village Trustees on January 2, 2018 Adopted by the Ludlow Select Board on December 4, 2017 Amended by the Ludlow Select Board on November 7, 2016 Amended by the Ludlow Select Board on August 3, 2015 Amended by the Ludlow Village Trustees on August 4, 2015 Adopted by the Ludlow Select Board on November 5, 2012 Adopted by the Ludlow Village Trustees on March 5, 2013 This Ludlow Municipal Plan was developed in 2018-2019 by the Ludlow Planning Commission with assistance from the Southern Windsor County Regional Planning Commission, Ascutney, VT. Financial support for undertaking this and previous revisions was provided, in part, by a Municipal Planning Grant from the Vermont Agency of Commerce and Community Development. Photo Credits: Many of the pictures found throughout this document were generously provided by Tom Johnson. ii Ludlow Municipal Plan Adopted October 2019 Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Public Process ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.3
    [Show full text]
  • Taconic Physiography
    Bulletin No. 272 ' Series B, Descriptive Geology, 74 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR . UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR 4 t TACONIC PHYSIOGRAPHY BY T. NELSON DALE WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1905 CONTENTS. Page. Letter of transinittal......................................._......--..... 7 Introduction..........I..................................................... 9 Literature...........:.......................... ........................... 9 Land form __._..___.._.___________..___._____......__..__...._..._--..-..... 18 Green Mountain Range ..................... .......................... 18 Taconic Range .............................'............:.............. 19 Transverse valleys._-_-_.-..._.-......-....___-..-___-_....--_.-.._-- 19 Longitudinal valleys ............................................. ^...... 20 Bensselaer Plateau .................................................... 20 Hudson-Champlain valley................ ..-,..-.-.--.----.-..-...... 21 The Taconic landscape..................................................... 21 The lakes............................................................ 22 Topographic types .............,.....:..............'.................... 23 Plateau type ...--....---....-.-.-.-.--....-...... --.---.-.-..-.--... 23 Taconic type ...-..........-........-----............--......----.-.-- 28 Hudson-Champlain type ......................"...............--....... 23 Rock material..........................'.......'..---..-.....-...-.--.-.-. 23 Harder rocks ....---...............-.-.....-.-...--.-.........
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology of the Lyndonville Area, Vermont
    THE GEOLOGY OF THE LYNDONVILLE AREA, VERMONT By JOHN G. DENNIS VERMONT GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES G. DOLL, Stale Geologist Published by VERMONT DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MONTPELIER, VERMONT BULLETIN NO. 8 1956 Lake Willoughby, seen from its north shore. TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ......................... 7 INTRODUCTION 8 Location 8 Geologic Setting ..................... 8 Previous Work ...................... 8 Purpose of Study ..................... 9 Method of Study 10 Acknowledgments . 11 Physiography ...................... 11 STRATIGRAPHY ....................... 16 Lithologic Descriptions .................. 16 Waits River Formation ................. 16 General Statement .................. 16 Distribution ..................... 16 Age 17 Lithological Detail .................. 17 Gile Mountain Formation ................ 19 General Statement .................. 19 Distribution ..................... 20 Lithologic Detail ................... 20 The Waits River /Gile Mountain Contact ........ 22 Age........................... 23 Preliminary Remarks .................. 23 Early Work ...................... 23 Richardson's Work in Eastern Vermont .......... 25 Recent Detailed Mapping in the Waits River Formation. 26 Detailed Work in Canada ................ 28 Relationships in the Connecticut River Valley, Vermont and New Hampshire ................... 30 Summary of Presently Held Opinions ........... 32 Discussion ....................... 32 Conclusions ...................... 33 STRUCTURE 34 Introduction and Structural Setting 34 Terminology ......................
    [Show full text]