DOCSLIB.ORG

The Geologist's Guide to the Galaxy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Geologist's Guide to the Galaxy NOVEMBER 19, 2019 The Geologist’s Guide to the Galaxy Fifty years after the first person walked on the moon, the relatively new field of planetary geology provides fresh insights into the origin of Earth, our solar system and the essence of life. By Paul A. Griffin WorldQuant, LLC 1700 East Putnam Ave. Third Floor Old Greenwich, CT 06870 www.weareworldquant.com 11.19.19 THE GEOLOGIST’S GUIDE TO THE GALAXY PERSPECTIVES PROLOGUE picture of what special conditions were present in our solar system IN THE FIELD OF PLANETARY GEOLOGY, 1969 WAS A TRANS- that generated the basis for life on Earth. This information may formational year. In early February, a meteorite fell near the not answer the probability-of-extraterrestrials question, but it village of Pueblito de Allende in northern Mexico, scattering does help us appreciate what factors make us unique and hence more than two tons of fusion-crusted stones over an area of better estimate the likelihood of similar life existing elsewhere in 75 square miles. Five months later, Apollo 11 made the first the universe. moon landing and brought 22 kilograms (48.5 pounds) of lunar material back to Earth. Then, at the end of September, To understand planetary geology, readers need to be familiar with a meteorite blazed over the southern Australian town of some astronomical objects, as these are the actors in our story. Our Murchison, showering more than 100 kilograms of rocks solar system consists of the four inner terrestrial planets (Mercury, containing amino acids essential for life. Venus, Earth and Mars), the main asteroid belt, the four ice giants (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune) and the Kuiper belt. The At the time, these three events may not have seemed to have asteroid belt is the ring of rocks, rubble and other material orbiting anything in common, but over the past 50 years the data collected the sun between Mars and Jupiter that, because of the velocities from them and similar occurrences have helped scientists piece generated by the gravitational resonances with Jupiter, cannot together answers to a cosmic puzzle. The questions they’ve pon- coalesce into larger bodies. Collisions in the asteroid belt can lead dered include: What processes led from the origin of the cosmos to material falling toward the terrestrial bodies, causing meteorite to the creation of our solar system? What caused the formation impacts on Earth. Most meteorites are mainly bits of asteroids, but of the moon? And what makes Earth so special that we have life, some come from Mars and our moon. which as far as we can tell seems to be unique in the universe? The Kuiper belt is a second outer ring, just beyond Neptune, and The potential existence of extraterrestrial life has long fascinated is much larger than the asteroid belt. While most asteroids are scientists. During a lunch with colleagues at the Los Alamos composed of rock and metal, the objects in the Kuiper belt are National Laboratory in 1950, physicist Enrico Fermi famously made up of ices, including methane, ammonia and water. Pluto, asked, “Where are they?” Fermi, who had won the Nobel Prize in which astronomers demoted to dwarf planet status in 2006, is a Physics in 1938, reasoned that some of the billions of stars in the member of the Kuiper belt. Comets (basically, cosmic snowballs) Milky Way similar to our sun should have had planets capable of are former members of the Kuiper belt originating from the farthest sustaining intelligent life. Furthermore, he posited, some of these region of our solar system, the Oort cloud. life forms should have developed advanced technologies capable of interstellar travel. Given that many of these stars are billions The sun is truly the center of our world, containing 99.86 percent of years old, there has been ample time for aliens to have visited of our solar system’s mass. (Jupiter and Saturn comprise more our planet, yet there are no signs of extraterrestrial life — the than 90 percent of the rest.) Jupiter, the largest planet, is about five Fermi paradox. times farther from the sun than Earth is, and most of the planets are locked into orbital period resonances with it. (Saturn, for example, In 1961, astrophysicist Frank Drake tried to quantify the answer is in a 2:5 resonance with Jupiter, meaning it orbits the sun twice to the Fermi paradox as a series of conditional probabilities even- for every five of Jupiter’s orbits.) tually leading to the detection of alien life. The Drake equation, which attempts to calculate the number of alien civilizations in the But our solar system represents a tiny corner of the universe. The Milky Way capable of communicating with Earth, has been a core Milky Way, our galaxy, has roughly 100 billion stars, some larger piece of the debate over the search for extraterrestrial intelligence and some smaller than our sun. The universe has about 10,000 (SETI). “A search of hundreds of thousands of stars in the hope of galaxies in each of its three dimensions, or 1 trillion galaxies in detecting one message would require remarkable dedication and total (10,0003).2 would probably take several decades,” Drake wrote in a January 1997 Scientific American article co-authored with renowned astron- PART 1: THE MOON omer Carl Sagan.1 On July 20, 1969, at 10:56 p.m. EDT, astronaut Neil Armstrong began climbing down the ladder of the Apollo 11 lunar module. More than two decades later, searching for a definitive answer Moments later, he proclaimed, “That’s one small step for a man, to Fermi’s question, thousands of people around the world are one giant leap for mankind.” Buzz Aldrin joined Armstrong on the using computers to monitor radio signals for signs of extrater- moon’s surface 19 minutes later. I watched these historic footsteps restrial intelligence through projects like SETI@home. Advances on a black-and-white television with my brother and parents at in planetary geology over the same period have provided a clearer home in Monterey, California. I was not alone: The first of six moon Copyright © 2019 WorldQuant, LLC November 2019 2 11.19.19 THE GEOLOGIST’S GUIDE TO THE GALAXY PERSPECTIVES Geology may be the most that after Armstrong said his famous words and inspected the lunar module exterior for damage, he gathered contingency lunar important science when it comes to samples and placed them in his collection bag in case an emergency understanding the formation of the ascent was required.3 If just this material had been recovered, the entire space program would have been a scientific success. moon and solar system. Fortunately, the Apollo moon missions brought back significantly more, a total of 220 kilograms of rocks,4 providing samples from landings was estimated to have been watched live by 600 million six sites chosen for their distinctive geological features. people, nearly one-fifth of the world’s population at the time. Late Heavy Bombardment Fifty years later, the Apollo 11 lunar mission is still one of mankind’s The moon’s surface is actually fairly homogeneous. When we look greatest scientific and technical accomplishments. For me, like at it with our naked eyes, the first thing that stands out are the many others, the event inspired an interest in the sciences most lunar maria (Latin for “seas”), multiple large dark impact craters clearly associated with the space program: physics and astronomy. so deep that they once generated volcanic outflows. The maria are Certainly, the space program deserves recognition for advancing surrounded by the highlands, or terrae, bright areas created by mete- those fields. But geology, the one science I did not appreciate at orite impacts that did not penetrate the moon’s crust. Rocks called the time of the lunar landings, may be the most important science regolith breccias5 make up some 80 percent of the lunar highlands, when it comes to understanding the formation of the moon and which almost completely cover the far side of the moon.6 (Earth solar system. In fact, the only Ph.D.-level scientist in the astronaut has regolith breccias as well, but they are not commonly seen due program who walked on the moon, Apollo 17’s Harrison (Jack) to the effects of weather and recycling of the surface.) Using fairly Schmitt, was a geologist. precise isotopic dating of the Apollo lunar samples, scientists were surprised to discover that the recovered breccias were created over a relatively narrow time period 3.9 billion to 4.0 billion years ago, MOONFALL during a period now called the Late Heavy Bombardment. Nearly all This lunar meteorite found in Northwest Africa is similar of the visible craters on the moon were created during this period.7 to the breccias collected by the Apollo missions. The Late Heavy Bombardment was a time of great turmoil and activity in the formation of our solar system. In fact, the asteroid bombardment affected Earth even more than the moon, but because of the recycling of Earth’s crust, it is not as obvious. Geologists have noticed for years that the rocks in the crust have an unusually large amount of iron-loving elements such as gold, palladium and platinum, which should have ended up in the planet’s core during the initial stages of its formation. These metals are believed to have come from a continuous process of asteroid and comet bombard- ment — in particular, the accretion of a late veneer on Earth’s surface roughly 3.5 billion to 4.5 billion years ago. The peak accumulations of the late veneer8 took place during the Late Heavy Bombardment.9 The moon’s gravity is very weak — during the Apollo 11 mission, Aldrin and Armstrong bounced along the lunar surface as they set up experiments and collected rocks.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Exploring the Bombardment History of the Moon
    EXPLORING THE BOMBARDMENT HISTORY OF THE MOON Community White Paper to the Planetary Decadal Survey, 2011-2020 September 15, 2009 Primary Author: William F. Bottke Center for Lunar Origin and Evolution (CLOE) NASA Lunar Science Institute at the Southwest Research Institute 1050 Walnut St., Suite 300 Boulder, CO 80302 Tel: (303) 546-6066 [email protected] Co-Authors/Endorsers: Carlton Allen (NASA JSC) Mahesh Anand (Open U., UK) Nadine Barlow (NAU) Donald Bogard (NASA JSC) Gwen Barnes (U. Idaho) Clark Chapman (SwRI) Barbara A. Cohen (NASA MSFC) Ian A. Crawford (Birkbeck College London, UK) Andrew Daga (U. North Dakota) Luke Dones (SwRI) Dean Eppler (NASA JSC) Vera Assis Fernandes (Berkeley Geochronlogy Center and U. Manchester) Bernard H. Foing (SMART-1, ESA RSSD; Dir., Int. Lunar Expl. Work. Group) Lisa R. Gaddis (US Geological Survey) 1 Jim N. Head (Raytheon) Fredrick P. Horz (LZ Technology/ESCG) Brad Jolliff (Washington U., St Louis) Christian Koeberl (U. Vienna, Austria) Michelle Kirchoff (SwRI) David Kring (LPI) Harold F. (Hal) Levison (SwRI) Simone Marchi (U. Padova, Italy) Charles Meyer (NASA JSC) David A. Minton (U. Arizona) Stephen J. Mojzsis (U. Colorado) Clive Neal (U. Notre Dame) Laurence E. Nyquist (NASA JSC) David Nesvorny (SWRI) Anne Peslier (NASA JSC) Noah Petro (GSFC) Carle Pieters (Brown U.) Jeff Plescia (Johns Hopkins U.) Mark Robinson (Arizona State U.) Greg Schmidt (NASA Lunar Science Institute, NASA Ames) Sen. Harrison H. Schmitt (Apollo 17 Astronaut; U. Wisconsin-Madison) John Spray (U. New Brunswick, Canada) Sarah Stewart-Mukhopadhyay (Harvard U.) Timothy Swindle (U. Arizona) Lawrence Taylor (U. Tennessee-Knoxville) Ross Taylor (Australian National U., Australia) Mark Wieczorek (Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, France) Nicolle Zellner (Albion College) Maria Zuber (MIT) 2 The Moon is unique.
    [Show full text]
  • Warren and Taylor-2014-In Tog-The Moon-'Author's Personal Copy'.Pdf
    This article was originally published in Treatise on Geochemistry, Second Edition published by Elsevier, and the attached copy is provided by Elsevier for the author's benefit and for the benefit of the author's institution, for non- commercial research and educational use including without limitation use in instruction at your institution, sending it to specific colleagues who you know, and providing a copy to your institution’s administrator. All other uses, reproduction and distribution, including without limitation commercial reprints, selling or licensing copies or access, or posting on open internet sites, your personal or institution’s website or repository, are prohibited. For exceptions, permission may be sought for such use through Elsevier's permissions site at: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissionusematerial Warren P.H., and Taylor G.J. (2014) The Moon. In: Holland H.D. and Turekian K.K. (eds.) Treatise on Geochemistry, Second Edition, vol. 2, pp. 213-250. Oxford: Elsevier. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Author's personal copy 2.9 The Moon PH Warren, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA GJ Taylor, University of Hawai‘i, Honolulu, HI, USA ã 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. This article is a revision of the previous edition article by P. H. Warren, volume 1, pp. 559–599, © 2003, Elsevier Ltd. 2.9.1 Introduction: The Lunar Context 213 2.9.2 The Lunar Geochemical Database 214 2.9.2.1 Artificially Acquired Samples 214 2.9.2.2 Lunar Meteorites 214 2.9.2.3 Remote-Sensing Data 215 2.9.3 Mare Volcanism
    [Show full text]
  • Vapor Drainage in the Protolunar Disk As the Cause for the Depletion in Volatile Elements of the Moon
    The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 884:L48 (10pp), 2019 October 20 https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab4a16 © 2019. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Vapor Drainage in the Protolunar Disk as the Cause for the Depletion in Volatile Elements of the Moon Nicole X. Nie and Nicolas Dauphas Origins Laboratory, Department of the Geophysical Sciences and Enrico Fermi Institute, The University of Chicago, 5734 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA; [email protected] Received 2019 July 23; revised 2019 September 27; accepted 2019 September 30; published 2019 October 17 Abstract Lunar rocks are severely depleted in moderately volatile elements (MVEs) such as Rb, K, and Zn relative to Earth. Identifying the cause of this depletion is important for understanding how the Earth–Moon system evolved in the aftermath of the Moon-forming giant impact. We measured the Rb isotopic compositions of lunar and terrestrial rocks to understand why MVEs are depleted in the Moon. Combining our new measurements with previous data reveals that the Moon has an 87Rb/85Rb ratio higher than Earth by +0.16±0.04‰. This isotopic composition is consistent with evaporation of Rb into a vapor medium that was ∼99% saturated. Evaporation under this saturation can also explain the previously documented isotopic fractionations of K, Ga, Cu, and Zn of lunar rocks relative to Earth. We show that a possible setting for achieving the same saturation upon evaporation of elements with such diverse volatilities is through viscous drainage of a partially vaporized protolunar disk onto Earth. In the framework of an α-disk model, the α-viscosity needed to explain the ∼99% saturation calculated here is 10−3–10−2, which is consistent with a vapor disk where viscosity is controlled by magnetorotational instability.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning a Mission to the Lunar South Pole
    Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter: (Diviner) Audience Planning a Mission to Grades 9-10 the Lunar South Pole Time Recommended 1-2 hours AAAS STANDARDS Learning Objectives: • 12A/H1: Exhibit traits such as curiosity, honesty, open- • Learn about recent discoveries in lunar science. ness, and skepticism when making investigations, and value those traits in others. • Deduce information from various sources of scientific data. • 12E/H4: Insist that the key assumptions and reasoning in • Use critical thinking to compare and evaluate different datasets. any argument—whether one’s own or that of others—be • Participate in team-based decision-making. made explicit; analyze the arguments for flawed assump- • Use logical arguments and supporting information to justify decisions. tions, flawed reasoning, or both; and be critical of the claims if any flaws in the argument are found. • 4A/H3: Increasingly sophisticated technology is used Preparation: to learn about the universe. Visual, radio, and X-ray See teacher procedure for any details. telescopes collect information from across the entire spectrum of electromagnetic waves; computers handle Background Information: data and complicated computations to interpret them; space probes send back data and materials from The Moon’s surface thermal environment is among the most extreme of any remote parts of the solar system; and accelerators give planetary body in the solar system. With no atmosphere to store heat or filter subatomic particles energies that simulate conditions in the Sun’s radiation, midday temperatures on the Moon’s surface can reach the stars and in the early history of the universe before 127°C (hotter than boiling water) whereas at night they can fall as low as stars formed.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Astronomical Sights and Sounds
    Jonathan Powell Rare Astronomical Sights and Sounds The Patrick Moore The Patrick Moore Practical Astronomy Series More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/3192 Rare Astronomical Sights and Sounds Jonathan Powell Jonathan Powell Ebbw Vale, United Kingdom ISSN 1431-9756 ISSN 2197-6562 (electronic) The Patrick Moore Practical Astronomy Series ISBN 978-3-319-97700-3 ISBN 978-3-319-97701-0 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97701-0 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018953700 © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors, and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Cratering in the Solar System
    Impact Cratering in the Solar System Michelle Kirchoff Lunar and Planetary Institute University of Houston - Clear Lake Physics Seminar March 24, 2008 Outline What is an impact crater? Why should we care about impact craters? Inner Solar System Outer Solar System Conclusions Open Questions What is an impact crater? Basically a hole in the ground… Barringer Meteor Crater (Earth) Bessel Crater (Moon) Diameter = 1.2 km Diameter = 16 km Depth = 200 m Depth = 2 km www.lpi.usra.edu What creates an “impact” crater? •Galileo sees circular features on Moon & realizes they are depressions (1610) •In 1600-1800’s many think they are volcanic features: look similar to extinct volcanoes on Earth; some even claim to see volcanic eruptions; space is empty (meteorites not verified until 1819 by Chladni) •G.K. Gilbert (1893) first serious support for lunar craters from impacts (geology and experiments) •On Earth Barringer (Meteor) crater recognized as created by impact by Barringer (1906) •Opik (1916) - impacts are high velocity, thus create circular craters at most impact angles Melosh, 1989 …High-Velocity Impacts! www.lpl.arizona.edu/SIC/impact_cratering/Chicxulub/Animation.gif Physics of Impact Cratering Understand how stress (or shock) waves propagate through material in 3 stages: 1. Contact and Compression 2. Excavation 3. Modification www.psi.edu/explorecraters/background.htm Hugoniot Equations Derived by P.H. Hugoniot (1887) to describe shock fronts using conservation of mass, momentum and energy across the discontinuity. equation (U-up) = oU of state P-Po = oupU E-Eo = (P+Po)(Vo-V)/2 P - pressure U - shock velocity up - particle velocity E - specific internal energy V = 1/specific volume) Understanding Crater Formation laboratory large simulations explosives (1950’s) (1940’s) www.nasa.gov/centers/ames/ numerical simulations (1960’s) www.lanl.gov/ Crater Morphology • Simple • Complex • Central peak/pit • Peak ring www3.imperial.ac.
    [Show full text]
  • March 21–25, 2016
    FORTY-SEVENTH LUNAR AND PLANETARY SCIENCE CONFERENCE PROGRAM OF TECHNICAL SESSIONS MARCH 21–25, 2016 The Woodlands Waterway Marriott Hotel and Convention Center The Woodlands, Texas INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT Universities Space Research Association Lunar and Planetary Institute National Aeronautics and Space Administration CONFERENCE CO-CHAIRS Stephen Mackwell, Lunar and Planetary Institute Eileen Stansbery, NASA Johnson Space Center PROGRAM COMMITTEE CHAIRS David Draper, NASA Johnson Space Center Walter Kiefer, Lunar and Planetary Institute PROGRAM COMMITTEE P. Doug Archer, NASA Johnson Space Center Nicolas LeCorvec, Lunar and Planetary Institute Katherine Bermingham, University of Maryland Yo Matsubara, Smithsonian Institute Janice Bishop, SETI and NASA Ames Research Center Francis McCubbin, NASA Johnson Space Center Jeremy Boyce, University of California, Los Angeles Andrew Needham, Carnegie Institution of Washington Lisa Danielson, NASA Johnson Space Center Lan-Anh Nguyen, NASA Johnson Space Center Deepak Dhingra, University of Idaho Paul Niles, NASA Johnson Space Center Stephen Elardo, Carnegie Institution of Washington Dorothy Oehler, NASA Johnson Space Center Marc Fries, NASA Johnson Space Center D. Alex Patthoff, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Cyrena Goodrich, Lunar and Planetary Institute Elizabeth Rampe, Aerodyne Industries, Jacobs JETS at John Gruener, NASA Johnson Space Center NASA Johnson Space Center Justin Hagerty, U.S. Geological Survey Carol Raymond, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Lindsay Hays, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Paul Schenk,
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Lunar Terminology
    Glossary of Lunar Terminology albedo A measure of the reflectivity of the Moon's gabbro A coarse crystalline rock, often found in the visible surface. The Moon's albedo averages 0.07, which lunar highlands, containing plagioclase and pyroxene. means that its surface reflects, on average, 7% of the Anorthositic gabbros contain 65-78% calcium feldspar. light falling on it. gardening The process by which the Moon's surface is anorthosite A coarse-grained rock, largely composed of mixed with deeper layers, mainly as a result of meteor­ calcium feldspar, common on the Moon. itic bombardment. basalt A type of fine-grained volcanic rock containing ghost crater (ruined crater) The faint outline that remains the minerals pyroxene and plagioclase (calcium of a lunar crater that has been largely erased by some feldspar). Mare basalts are rich in iron and titanium, later action, usually lava flooding. while highland basalts are high in aluminum. glacis A gently sloping bank; an old term for the outer breccia A rock composed of a matrix oflarger, angular slope of a crater's walls. stony fragments and a finer, binding component. graben A sunken area between faults. caldera A type of volcanic crater formed primarily by a highlands The Moon's lighter-colored regions, which sinking of its floor rather than by the ejection of lava. are higher than their surroundings and thus not central peak A mountainous landform at or near the covered by dark lavas. Most highland features are the center of certain lunar craters, possibly formed by an rims or central peaks of impact sites.
    [Show full text]
  • NWA 5000 – ONE of a KIND? N. Artemieva1,2. 1Planetary Science Institute, [email protected]
    77th Annual Meteoritical Society Meeting (2014) 5231.pdf NWA 5000 – ONE OF A KIND? N. Artemieva1,2. 1Planetary Science Institute, [email protected]. 2Instiitute for Dynamics of Geospheres, RAS, Russia. Introduction: The list of lunar meteorites consists of 95 names with the total mass of ~75 kg. The spallation theory [1] and numerical simulations [2-4] allowed to explain the formation of solid high-velocity ejecta and to reconcile the results of nu- merical models with observations. Presence of a porous regolith layer on the Moon decreases at least tenfold the total mass of sol- id escape ejecta because of much lower shock pressures required for shock melting [4]. Projectiles smaller than 10-20 m in diame- ter are able to propel exclusively the regolith (i.e., molten dust with random and unknown inclusions of consolidated breccia or rocks) into space. It means that the contribution of these small cratering events to the flux of lunar meteorites is non-predictable. Larger impact events which are able to excavate underlying megaregolith are statistically unlikely within a short, < 10 kyr, time frame [5]. Thus, one of the biggest (11.5 kg) and the young- est (terrestrial age <10 kyr, [6]) lunar meteorite, NWA 5000 (feldsparic breccia) is a real miracle. Numerical model and initial conditions: High-velocity im- pacts on the Moon are modeled using the 3D hydrocode SOVA [7] complemented by the ANEOS equation of state for geological materials. The lunar regolith porosity is described in the frame of ε-alpha model [8]. Tracer particles are used to find dynamics and thermal history of solid inclusions into the regolith.
    [Show full text]
  • ELEMENTAL ABUNDANCES in the SILICATE PHASE of PALLASITIC METEORITES Redacted for Privacy Abstract Approved: Roman A
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF THURMAN DALE COOPER for theMASTER OF SCIENCE (Name) (Degree) in CHEMISTRY presented on June 1, 1973 (Major) (Date) Title: ELEMENTAL ABUNDANCES IN THE SILICATE PHASE OF PALLASITIC METEORITES Redacted for privacy Abstract approved: Roman A. Schmitt The silicate phases of 11 pallasites were analyzed instrumen- tally to determine the concentrations of some major, minor, and trace elements.The silicate phases were found to contain about 98% olivine with 1 to 2% accessory minerals such as lawrencite, schreibersite, troilite, chromite, and farringtonite present.The trace element concentrations, except Sc and Mn, were found to be extremely low and were found primarily in the accessory phases rather than in the pure olivine.An unusual bimodal Mn distribution was noted in the pallasites, and Eagle Station had a chondritic nor- malized REE pattern enrichedin the heavy REE. The silicate phases of pallasites and mesosiderites were shown to be sufficiently diverse in origin such that separate classifications are entirely justified. APPROVED: Redacted for privacy Professor of Chemistry in charge of major Redacted for privacy Chairman of Department of Chemistry Redacted for privacy Dean of Graduate School Date thesis is presented June 1,1973 Typed by Opal Grossnicklaus for Thurman Dale Cooper Elemental Abundances in the Silicate Phase of Pallasitic Meteorites by Thurman Dale Cooper A THESIS submitted to Oregon State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science June 1974 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author wishes to express his gratitude to Prof. Roman A. Schmitt for his guidance, suggestions, discussions, and thoughtful- ness which have served as an inspiration.
    [Show full text]
  • South Pole-Aitken Basin
    Feasibility Assessment of All Science Concepts within South Pole-Aitken Basin INTRODUCTION While most of the NRC 2007 Science Concepts can be investigated across the Moon, this chapter will focus on specifically how they can be addressed in the South Pole-Aitken Basin (SPA). SPA is potentially the largest impact crater in the Solar System (Stuart-Alexander, 1978), and covers most of the central southern farside (see Fig. 8.1). SPA is both topographically and compositionally distinct from the rest of the Moon, as well as potentially being the oldest identifiable structure on the surface (e.g., Jolliff et al., 2003). Determining the age of SPA was explicitly cited by the National Research Council (2007) as their second priority out of 35 goals. A major finding of our study is that nearly all science goals can be addressed within SPA. As the lunar south pole has many engineering advantages over other locations (e.g., areas with enhanced illumination and little temperature variation, hydrogen deposits), it has been proposed as a site for a future human lunar outpost. If this were to be the case, SPA would be the closest major geologic feature, and thus the primary target for long-distance traverses from the outpost. Clark et al. (2008) described four long traverses from the center of SPA going to Olivine Hill (Pieters et al., 2001), Oppenheimer Basin, Mare Ingenii, and Schrödinger Basin, with a stop at the South Pole. This chapter will identify other potential sites for future exploration across SPA, highlighting sites with both great scientific potential and proximity to the lunar South Pole.
    [Show full text]
  • Meteorite Collections: Sample List
    Meteorite Collections: Sample List Institute of Meteoritics Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences University of New Mexico October 01, 2021 Institute of Meteoritics Meteorite Collection The IOM meteorite collection includes samples from approximately 600 different meteorites, representative of most meteorite types. The last printed copy of the collection's Catalog was published in 1990. We will no longer publish a printed catalog, but instead have produced this web-based Online Catalog, which presents the current catalog in searchable and downloadable forms. The database will be updated periodically. The date on the front page of this version of the catalog is the date that it was downloaded from the worldwide web. The catalog website is: Although we have made every effort to avoid inaccuracies, the database may still contain errors. Please contact the collection's Curator, Dr. Rhian Jones, ([email protected]) if you have any questions or comments. Cover photos: Top left: Thin section photomicrograph of the martian shergottite, Zagami (crossed nicols). Brightly colored crystals are pyroxene; black material is maskelynite (a form of plagioclase feldspar that has been rendered amorphous by high shock pressures). Photo is 1.5 mm across. (Photo by R. Jones.) Top right: The Pasamonte, New Mexico, eucrite (basalt). This individual stone is covered with shiny black fusion crust that formed as the stone fell through the earth's atmosphere. Photo is 8 cm across. (Photo by K. Nicols.) Bottom left: The Dora, New Mexico, pallasite. Orange crystals of olivine are set in a matrix of iron, nickel metal. Photo is 10 cm across. (Photo by K.
    [Show full text]