DOCSLIB.ORG

05.08.21. Records Concerning Seth Rich

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RE: JANICE WOLK GRENADIER JWG) INTERVENER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :;o m () V. CRIM. No. 17-232 EGS I m 0,. MICHAEL T. FLYNN -< m -P. MOTION TO INTERVENE BY JANICE WOLK GRENADIER O .z::: VICTIM of the LEGISLATURE & JUDICIARY OF FEDERAL AND STATE OF VIRGIN'&_ U.S. and VIRGINIA STATE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS VIOLATED FOR YEARS "COVER UP" BY DOJ & FBI SUPPORTS and SHOWS THE PATTERN & PRACTICE COMES NOW, Intervener Janice Wolk Grenadier (JWG) claims that she as General Flynn have been harmed by the collusion and corruption of the DOJ and the FBI. That Genera l Fly nn went to wa r to protect the FREEDOMS of the America n Citizens. Rights that American C itizens do not have. WHERE IT STARTED FBI February 18, 2014 - F Bl cautions residents of public corruption in Va. - http://www.wusa9.com/storv/news/local/2014/02/18/fbi-cautions-residents-of-public-corruption-in-northern-virqinia/5 585877/ WASHINGTON (WUSA) -- The Federal Bureau of!nvestigation's (FBI) Washington Field Office is looking to identify any public corruption occurring in Northern Virginia. The FBI says public corruption can occur "when a public official, at any level of government - local, state or federal - does any official act in exchange for money, or other free goods or services, fo r private gain. Public corruption could also include public employees who take something of value for th eir own personal gain, th ereby violating the public's trust." The FBI soys many of th eir investigations into public corruption start once they receive a tip from someone. If you want to help identify potential criminal activity, the Wa shington Field Office has set up a Northern Virginia Public Corruption Hotline at 703-686-6225 and you can also e-mail th em at [email protected]. Some of the examples of corruption include: Government officials such as OMV employees, city inspectors, taxing or zoning assessors or other regulatory agency employees, or even town councils or mayors; Contracting officials at al/ levels, including those who manage government contracts or regulatory permits; or, school resource officers who manage school accounts; Local officials colluding with real estate investors to rig th e bidding process at foreclosure auctions; A person representing the iudicia/ branch - a iudge, member of the iury or court personnel; or, A person representing law enforcement, who steals drugs from criminals, embezzles government funds, falsifies records or smuggles contraband 1 Document ID: 0.7.5411.5788-000002 20201221-0000004 Who do you go to for H ELP? Notthe FBI https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/washingtondc/press-releases/2014/fbi-announces-campaign-to-seek-public-a ssistance-identifying-acts-of-public-corruption If you go to the site and then hit the link YOU USED TO GET THIS for the transcripts you - got NOTHING Corney when asked about it - LIED said he knew nothing about this https://youtu.be/KlsSkkxYnTg the question asked at Brookings event. ~ ~ ..- ..-.:. - · \ I I 71' • - \I •• ..,, ~ / 7 ·· I . 1 ,; I ,,,C_;f,.:•.!• .._ ,,, ., _ , , f;, ;.. 1'A'4Hl'f 1t11,, 1,, ... co,1,,1 1 , \ lt.tJl l l\ Mo,, .. ,,111, , ... , ,1,1, .. ,t.\U I , "'' 1.,,u, Seltct Language y Field Office Lmks '1 hi..•" .t11 h1H d m ..trn.tl h 11m tlh· I t'tlt r.d lh1rt·,.11 ol l nH''\11(,,,lll••H t i 11 11 ~..-1,..11(' II 111.t\ t • !l;t .1 111 outll,,11,ll Washm9ton ml 1f11u1Jon ,u... 1111\1, ,,. m,.\ "" l0111 ·r luu11 ttun wro Hom<t ConlA(l u~ 0 D ... FUI Announces Campuii,:n to Seek Public As sistan ce Identify ing Acts of Puhlic Corruption Nf'w• and Out•••IC. h tJ# ' FUI \\'u,liins;ton Puhlir l nform n tio n O fficr I", hn1.u, 18 . .!ut I f ..:o.!) .!'-H- till) ·nil' 1·u_lt'r,1l Bun ,HI 111 Im, -.t1x,111o n -. ( I 81 I \\'.1• hm~to n f K ltl l )fl1tt , , -w: 1.L.inJ( tlu puhhC'" a~ 1 ,tnnu• 111 r om· l r1111111.,I UtH , 11v_,t11\1. pnonh. u lt 11111\m~ puhltl 1. orrupt mn II\ !\'ortht·rn \"1r,;1111,,., th1.~ FHI , numl"M: w.m,~u by 1h,• re, . wro puhlll· n>rn1p11n11 ou:u ~ ,,hut ,1 puhli.· nfl1u.,I. .111.1n, lt'\1. I 0 1 l(O\trnmt·nt lo•.·.11. , 1.1h · or lt"(lt r.tl tint~ nm nffic Lll ill'I III l' \l h,IIIRt' for lllOlll'\ or otlu r lrt't' K' M"l" or , H, IL't, tor 11r1,.1li• ~11 n PuhliL· l 'fll rupllon FBI Job~ 1ould .11!'1'.o mt.huh• publll' t• mplo\t'1'' " hn t.1 k1• 'l•lllh 111111,r. nt ,.1lut• tor thr1r m, n 1w~111.1I ,:..1111 . lht•h h\ ,u1lu11n~ tht puhla ·, tm -.r Puhl" nirnip111111 1111 , 111 tht· ht.ll"t o f ,,tMt 11 ~ •l\t rnnit·nt 1"' , u1,1w..,.--.I tu ,lu 11t n1 H"ipt'ol•h• Listen: Public Service Announcement H ,I, 1 I I ;111 npl P11hll1.• ,·un uptaun 14' oft1. 11 till' r, --. u lt o l .1J:_rt 1'11li:llh 111,,lll• Ill ,, lw,;p11t'tl t:o n\l r-.,1111111, o nd 'it·,1!1.tl ,., 11h 11uu.k luuut~h:tki't. Till" ....~ u, tl\l' n.,turr o f t hr C' nnw m al..t., II dtfhC'u h tt, dltfft \,t1™1ut tlw a~,;1 .1:rnr rot •om.triu.'<I •·11 111•11 , . ~l.un 1,f tlw I Ill , 111\1. ,11x.ttuu" 111hl puhlu ton-up111m ht J;lll ""1th .1 tip !ruin n mt orw \\h11 t ncounln'i , ornaptum '11h r,·trn,•, tlu- 1mhh1., \\ 111111,tnt·,, tn l·omt• fun,.,nl ,md r, l'k>f"I ,d,u,... ol ,.,ubht· o ftu l~ l"i l ~ 1111.11 to lht· Fur, tn\1 , 11~.11I011 ,. Tlw HU "' w.,~hm,ttm, l11·kl (JffM l h.1"' ,I 1lnh1·,lhd ''-Ill.Kl o l :tJ;t•1u , lh:1 1 lll\t , 11~~ltt' a llqit.tlum, o l puhhc· ,·orruptum 111 !\o rth,·111 \'1r,;~1ni.a To In Ip ult-1111(\ po1t·n11,1I t·11111111nl .u II\ 11 ,. 1tw \ \ ",1i..l11 n ~ tll11 I 1t Id {lll1 t·t• h.L, ~ t UJl .i !\w lht rn \ "1r,:1111.1 Puhlu· ( "11rru p11o n I li,tlllll' :H ..., _t hHh· h.!.!'j , ind t'·m , 11 1 at :--.:o,·.,p( .,. K' .On )tn\ \\' h1lr t ht• ,.1--.t m .itunt, nl puhlir othn.,l, .1rt. hu m t an tht· ir \\c,rk .tml c1,11111utli c.l to "4.·n m ~ tlu II h 11cm ,·111,cn". unfo rtunatd,. n sm,111 pt·rc1. nta~t 0 1 1n1hhl nfflcul, ahu l' thor c,flltT< and the ~llllHt, that thl'~ h (·n ~ "''\orn h• uplmld E,.tmple, 11f t orrup11Ctn. h h1 r 1.· hnh,:n ~1n d1or k1ckh.1cl, 1K1. 11r 111 t ,d1.1n)t,· lor u f11u.il tu-lion, rouhl 11u lud1.~ p uh lu· 1. urmptmn 1.'fm111Hth d In G mtTrllllUll olfK·1,1L" , mh ''"' 1•~1, · t• ntplo\l'\ ,. lll\ 111, lk. l lttP\. 1.. , 111g 111 1011111~ u~h (' ,or" nr otlll'r rt,tul:thll"\ .t~t ttC'\ l mplo,, t. ,. ,1r, , ,·n to,,n ,·mmnl"' or rn;l\o~. ( '011t1at tm~ oll1C"1.,t, nt .1II lt'\d,., uu luduu.~ 1ht1 l' "hu 111J11.1,:.t· ~•1\1. nmh 111 1. 1m1r,u1 , or r, KUl.tlon pt r11111 ,. ur .,d,ool rn ourn• 11fl11 t r, \\ho 111.111,IF,l' '4:' hoo l ,1u·ollrlh, • l.ot..11 o tlu·rnl, tolludmK \\llh ri·,11 l '1 1,lll' m \t '11111, 10 n ~ lht• huhlm;; prot:l""""' at loredo,ur,• ,111t 111111, . • A l>t'r" '" rt pn "' ntm,t 1h,• J111hu.1 l hr.tlh h .1Jm.l,;t•. mt m l,-·ro( tin· J IU"\ orto urt 1)("N11111t I. .\ J X r " ,n h pn ""- 11 1111,: ti\, t 11 fun'- '"'" 'H \\ho , h ,th tlruJ::,, trrnn \: r11n111.d,. l'lllht.uh.s ~0,1.•nun t nt lumb. t.1t~1f11 .., n n ,nh. ur , 11u1AAI, , 1ontr.1h.mtl T,,o ryn•nt t.•,.unpl• ..,ot puhht n11rupl 11111 111 \t,t1~ 1IL·1l h, tht• I Bl , W.1-.h111~1011 l· 1tl1l Ufht.·t.•. ,,111, h 1111 hult.•-c 111n .. , l,nmn o\1·r Surtlh n 1 \ '1rx111M . 1n • ,1 UM\" t·m11loH·,· 1u1c.l ' "'' otlu r-.. ,, ho pl,tl ~ m lt , 10 "'"'-'- p l1n)t hnlM."' 111 ,·•u lu nKt' f11r ll~J\ ' d n,. umt 111, 1t1r 1llqtnl ,1hul'I "'h" \H·n. o tl u n\1'4 nut d1~1h h•; .mJ ..a dud nf a , o h11t111.·r hn• clqu1111unt \\ht, pit d ~u1h, to tlH tt frnm a pm>=,r.1111 1ha 1 m.·t.l\t·tl fl"titr11l lumt, Su, h C'\.1 111pl c... ul puh l1t· c 11rrnp1ion • rodt· Cht• puhhl s t tlllfltlt ntt· .incl u ndt rm1m tth' !lll'\' 11,tth u l our );U\t' OIIIH.. n t. 2 Document ID: 0.7.5411.5788-000002 20201221-0000005 WHY THE DIRECTIVE FOR ALL PUBLIC CORRUPTION IN VIRGINIA TO FBI AND WAS FBI INVOLVED IN JWG ILLEGAL JAILING and GANG AGAINST HER? 1. Gov. Terry McAulliff - 1st choice VP for Hillary Clinton until this became public? 1. $130,000 donation Chinse Nationalist - He Starts out lying about it https://abcnews4.com/news/nation-world/va-~ov-mcauliffe-feds-have-found-no-wron~doin~ 2 GreenTech Chinese investors sue Gov.
Recommended publications
  • Channel Guide 424 NFL Redzone HD

    Channel Guide 424 NFL Redzone HD

    ADD TO YOUR PACKAGE for an additional fee A LA CARTE 124 NFL RedZone Channel Guide 424 NFL RedZone HD COLLEGE SPORTS PACK 23 SEC Network 127 Fox College Sports (Atlantic) 30 ESPNU 128 Fox College Sports (Pacific) 32 Outdoor Channel 129 Fox College Sports (Central) 33 Sportsman Channel PREMIUM CHANNELS 500 HBO 503 HBO Family HBO 501 HBO 2 504 HBO Comedy 502 HBO Signature 505 HBO Zone 550 Cinemax 554 Movie MAX 551 More MAX 555 Cinemax Latino Cinemax 552 Action MAX 556 5StarMAX 553 Thriller MAX 557 OuterMAX 560 SHOWTIME Family Zone 561 SHOWTIME 2 567 SHOWTIME 562 SHOWTIME BET Women 563 SHOWTIME 570 TMC Extreme Showtime 571 TMC Extra 564 SHOWTIME x 572 FLIX BET 565 SHOWTIME Next 566 SHOWTIME 581 STARZ 592 STARZ ENCORE 582 STARZ in Black Classic 583 STARZ Kids & 593 STARZ ENCORE Family Suspense Starz/ 584 STARZ Edge 594 STARZ ENCORE Encore 585 STARZ Cinema Black 586 STARZ Comedy 595 STARZ ENCORE 590 STARZ ENCORE Westerns 591 STARZ ENCORE 596 STARZ ENCORE Action Family AcenTek Video is not available in all areas. Programming is subject to change without notice. All channels not available to everyone. Additional charges may apply to commercial GRAND RAPIDS DMA PREMIUM HD CHANNELS customers for some of the available channels. For assistance 700 HBO HD 781 STARZ HD call Customer Service at 616.895.9911. 750 Cinemax HD 790 STARZ ENCORE HD Revised 8/30/21 760 Showtime HD 6568 Lake Michigan Drive | PO Box 509 | Allendale, MI 49401 AcenTek.net BASIC VIDEO Basic Video is available in Standard or High Definition.
  • In United States District Court for the District of Columbia

    In United States District Court for the District of Columbia

    Case 1:13-cv-00851-RJL Document 13-1 Filed 10/29/13 Page 1 of 31 IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LARRY KLAYMAN, et. al Plaintiffs, v. BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II, et. al Defendants. Civil Action No. 13-CV-851 PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION I. INTRODUCTION On June 9, 2013, Plaintiffs filed suit challenging the legality of Defendants’ secret and illicit government scheme to systematically gather, intercept and analyze vast quantities of domestic telephonic communications and “metadata” wholly within the United States by implementing a highly classified, unlawful mass call tracking surveillance program. Compl. ¶2. On April 25, 2013, Defendant Honorable Roger Vinson, a judge of the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (“FISC”), issued a top-secret order compelling the disclosure of all call detail records in possession of Verizon Telecommunication for analysis by the National Security Agency (“NSA”) on an ongoing daily basis.1 On June 5, 2013, based on the disclosures of whistleblower, Edward Snowden, who fled the United States for fear of government reprisal, The Guardian publicly revealed this previously classified order in an article entitled “NSA collecting phone records of millions of Verizon customers daily. Exclusive: Top secret order 1 Compl. ¶26; See, In re Application of the FBI for an Order Requiring the Production of Tangible Things from Verizon Bus. Network Servs., Inc. on Behalf of MCI Commc’n Servs., Inc. d/b/a Verizon Bus. Servs., No. BR 13-80 (FISA Ct. Apr. 25, 2013) (“Verizon Order”).
  • The Misrepresented Road to Madame President: Media Coverage of Female Candidates for National Office

    The Misrepresented Road to Madame President: Media Coverage of Female Candidates for National Office

    THE MISREPRESENTED ROAD TO MADAME PRESIDENT: MEDIA COVERAGE OF FEMALE CANDIDATES FOR NATIONAL OFFICE by Jessica Pinckney A thesis submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Government Baltimore, Maryland May, 2015 © 2015 Jessica Pinckney All Rights Reserved Abstract While women represent over fifty percent of the U.S. population, it is blatantly clear that they are not as equally represented in leadership positions in the government and in private institutions. Despite their representation throughout the nation, women only make up twenty percent of the House and Senate. That is far from a representative number and something that really hurts our society as a whole. While these inequalities exist, they are perpetuated by the world in which we live, where the media plays a heavy role in molding peoples’ opinions, both consciously and subconsciously. The way in which the media presents news about women is not always representative of the women themselves and influences public opinion a great deal, which can also affect women’s ability to rise to the top, thereby breaking the ultimate glass ceilings. This research looks at a number of cases in which female politicians ran for and/or were elected to political positions at the national level (President, Vice President, and Congress) and seeks to look at the progress, or lack thereof, in media’s portrayal of female candidates running for office. The overarching goal of the research is to simply show examples of biased and unbiased coverage and address the negative or positive ways in which that coverage influences the candidate.
  • Beyond the Bully Pulpit: Presidential Speech in the Courts

    Beyond the Bully Pulpit: Presidential Speech in the Courts

    SHAW.TOPRINTER (DO NOT DELETE) 11/15/2017 3:32 AM Beyond the Bully Pulpit: Presidential Speech in the Courts Katherine Shaw* Abstract The President’s words play a unique role in American public life. No other figure speaks with the reach, range, or authority of the President. The President speaks to the entire population, about the full range of domestic and international issues we collectively confront, and on behalf of the country to the rest of the world. Speech is also a key tool of presidential governance: For at least a century, Presidents have used the bully pulpit to augment their existing constitutional and statutory authorities. But what sort of impact, if any, should presidential speech have in court, if that speech is plausibly related to the subject matter of a pending case? Curiously, neither judges nor scholars have grappled with that question in any sustained way, though citations to presidential speech appear with some frequency in judicial opinions. Some of the time, these citations are no more than passing references. Other times, presidential statements play a significant role in judicial assessments of the meaning, lawfulness, or constitutionality of either legislation or executive action. This Article is the first systematic examination of presidential speech in the courts. Drawing on a number of cases in both the Supreme Court and the lower federal courts, I first identify the primary modes of judicial reliance on presidential speech. I next ask what light the law of evidence, principles of deference, and internal executive branch dynamics can shed on judicial treatment of presidential speech.
  • AMERICAN P VERSIGHT

    AMERICAN P VERSIGHT

    AMERICAN p VERSIGHT January11,2021 VIA ONLINE PORTAL DouglasHibbard Chief,InitialRequestStaff OfficeofInform ationPolicy DepartmentofJustice 441GStNW,6thFloor Washington,DC20530 ViaOnlinePortal Re: Expedited Freedom of Information Act Request DearFOIAOfficer: PursuanttotheFreedomof InformationAct(FOIA),5U.S.C.§552,andthe implem entingregulationsof youragency,Am ericanOversightmakesthefollowing requestforrecords. OnJanuary6,2021,PresidentTrumpinciteda mtoob attackCongresswhile mbers em werecertifyingtheelectionforPresident-electJoeBiden. 1 Theapparent insurrectionistsattackedtheCapitolBuilding,forcedtheirwaypastreportedly understaffedCapitolPolice,andultim atelydelayedtheCongressionalsessionbyforcing lawmakersandtheirstaffstoflee. 2 Fourpeoplediedduringthisassaultandafifth person,aCapitolPoliceofficer,diedthefollowingdayfrominjuriesincurredwhile engagingwithrioters. 3 Whilem ilitia mbers em roamedthehallsofCongress,Trum preportedlyfoughtagainst deployingtheD.C.NationalGuard, 4 andtheDefenseDepartm entreportedlyinitially 1 PressRelease,OfficeofSen.MittRom ney,Rom neyCondemInsurrectionatU.S. ns Capitol, Jan.6,2021, https://www.romney.senate.gov/rom ney-condem ns-insurrection- us-capitol. 2 RebeccaTan,etal., TrumpSupportersStormU.S.Capitol,WithOneWomanKilledand TearGasFired, Wash.Post(Jan.7,2021,12:30AM), https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/trum p-supporters-storm -capitol- dc/2021/01/06/58afc0b8-504b-11eb-83e3-322644d82356 story.html. 3 EricLevenson, WhatWeKnowAboutthe5DeathsinthePro-TrumpMobthatStormedthe Capitol, CNN(Jan.8,2021,5:29PM),
  • FAKE NEWS!”: President Trump’S Campaign Against the Media on @Realdonaldtrump and Reactions to It on Twitter

    FAKE NEWS!”: President Trump’S Campaign Against the Media on @Realdonaldtrump and Reactions to It on Twitter

    “FAKE NEWS!”: President Trump’s Campaign Against the Media on @realdonaldtrump and Reactions To It on Twitter A PEORIA Project White Paper Michael Cornfield GWU Graduate School of Political Management [email protected] April 10, 2019 This report was made possible by a generous grant from William Madway. SUMMARY: This white paper examines President Trump’s campaign to fan distrust of the news media (Fox News excepted) through his tweeting of the phrase “Fake News (Media).” The report identifies and illustrates eight delegitimation techniques found in the twenty-five most retweeted Trump tweets containing that phrase between January 1, 2017 and August 31, 2018. The report also looks at direct responses and public reactions to those tweets, as found respectively on the comment thread at @realdonaldtrump and in random samples (N = 2500) of US computer-based tweets containing the term on the days in that time period of his most retweeted “Fake News” tweets. Along with the high percentage of retweets built into this search, the sample exhibits techniques and patterns of response which are identified and illustrated. The main findings: ● The term “fake news” emerged in public usage in October 2016 to describe hoaxes, rumors, and false alarms, primarily in connection with the Trump-Clinton presidential contest and its electoral result. ● President-elect Trump adopted the term, intensified it into “Fake News,” and directed it at “Fake News Media” starting in December 2016-January 2017. 1 ● Subsequently, the term has been used on Twitter largely in relation to Trump tweets that deploy it. In other words, “Fake News” rarely appears on Twitter referring to something other than what Trump is tweeting about.
  • Rules Versus Standards in Antitrust Adjudication Daniel A

    Rules Versus Standards in Antitrust Adjudication Daniel A

    Washington and Lee Law Review Volume 64 | Issue 1 Article 3 Winter 10-1-2007 Rules Versus Standards in Antitrust Adjudication Daniel A. Crane Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr Part of the Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons Recommended Citation Daniel A. Crane, Rules Versus Standards in Antitrust Adjudication, 64 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 49 (2007), https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol64/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington and Lee Law Review at Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington and Lee Law Review by an authorized editor of Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Rules Versus Standards in Antitrust Adjudication Daniel A. Crane* Abstract Antitrust law is moving away from rules (ex ante, limited factor liability determinants) and toward standards (ex post, multi-factor liability determinants). This movement has importantconsequencesfor the structure of antitrust adjudication,including shifting ultimate decision-making down the legal hierarchy (in the direction ofjuries, trial courts sitting as fact- finders, and administrative agencies) and increasing the importance of economic experts. The efficiency consequences of this trend are often negative. Specifying liability determinants as open-ended, unpredictable standards increases litigation costs, chills socially beneficial industrial practices,allocates
  • Channel Lineup January 2018

    Channel Lineup January 2018

    MyTV CHANNEL LINEUP JANUARY 2018 ON ON ON SD HD• DEMAND SD HD• DEMAND SD HD• DEMAND My64 (WSTR) Cincinnati 11 511 Foundation Pack Kids & Family Music Choice 300-349• 4 • 4 A&E 36 536 4 Music Choice Play 577 Boomerang 284 4 ABC (WCPO) Cincinnati 9 509 4 National Geographic 43 543 4 Cartoon Network 46 546 • 4 Big Ten Network 206 606 NBC (WLWT) Cincinnati 5 505 4 Discovery Family 48 548 4 Beauty iQ 637 Newsy 508 Disney 49 549 • 4 Big Ten Overflow Network 207 NKU 818+ Disney Jr. 50 550 + • 4 Boone County 831 PBS Dayton/Community Access 16 Disney XD 282 682 • 4 Bounce TV 258 QVC 15 515 Nickelodeon 45 545 • 4 Campbell County 805-807, 810-812+ QVC2 244• Nick Jr. 286 686 4 • CBS (WKRC) Cincinnati 12 512 SonLife 265• Nicktoons 285 • 4 Cincinnati 800-804, 860 Sundance TV 227• 627 Teen Nick 287 • 4 COZI TV 290 TBNK 815-817, 819-821+ TV Land 35 535 • 4 C-Span 21 The CW 17 517 Universal Kids 283 C-Span 2 22 The Lebanon Channel/WKET2 6 Movies & Series DayStar 262• The Word Network 263• 4 Discovery Channel 32 532 THIS TV 259• MGM HD 628 ESPN 28 528 4 TLC 57 557 4 STARZEncore 482 4 ESPN2 29 529 Travel Channel 59 559 4 STARZEncore Action 497 4 EVINE Live 245• Trinity Broadcasting Network (TBN) 18 STARZEncore Action West 499 4 EVINE Too 246• Velocity HD 656 4 STARZEncore Black 494 4 EWTN 264•/97 Waycross 850-855+ STARZEncore Black West 496 4 FidoTV 688 WCET (PBS) Cincinnati 13 513 STARZEncore Classic 488 4 Florence 822+ WKET/Community Access 96 596 4 4 STARZEncore Classic West 490 Food Network 62 562 WKET1 294• 4 4 STARZEncore Suspense 491 FOX (WXIX) Cincinnati 3 503 WKET2 295• STARZEncore Suspense West 493 4 FOX Business Network 269• 669 WPTO (PBS) Oxford 14 STARZEncore Family 479 4 FOX News 66 566 Z Living 636 STARZEncore West 483 4 FOX Sports 1 25 525 STARZEncore Westerns 485 4 FOX Sports 2 219• 619 Variety STARZEncore Westerns West 487 4 FOX Sports Ohio (FSN) 27 527 4 AMC 33 533 FLiX 432 4 FOX Sports Ohio Alt Feed 601 4 Animal Planet 44 544 Showtime 434 435 4 Ft.
  • White House Compliance with Committee Subpoenas Hearings

    White House Compliance with Committee Subpoenas Hearings

    WHITE HOUSE COMPLIANCE WITH COMMITTEE SUBPOENAS HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM AND OVERSIGHT HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION NOVEMBER 6 AND 7, 1997 Serial No. 105–61 Printed for the use of the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 45–405 CC WASHINGTON : 1998 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Jan 31 2003 08:13 May 28, 2003 Jkt 085679 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 E:\HEARINGS\45405 45405 COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM AND OVERSIGHT DAN BURTON, Indiana, Chairman BENJAMIN A. GILMAN, New York HENRY A. WAXMAN, California J. DENNIS HASTERT, Illinois TOM LANTOS, California CONSTANCE A. MORELLA, Maryland ROBERT E. WISE, JR., West Virginia CHRISTOPHER SHAYS, Connecticut MAJOR R. OWENS, New York STEVEN SCHIFF, New Mexico EDOLPHUS TOWNS, New York CHRISTOPHER COX, California PAUL E. KANJORSKI, Pennsylvania ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida GARY A. CONDIT, California JOHN M. MCHUGH, New York CAROLYN B. MALONEY, New York STEPHEN HORN, California THOMAS M. BARRETT, Wisconsin JOHN L. MICA, Florida ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, Washington, THOMAS M. DAVIS, Virginia DC DAVID M. MCINTOSH, Indiana CHAKA FATTAH, Pennsylvania MARK E. SOUDER, Indiana ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland JOE SCARBOROUGH, Florida DENNIS J. KUCINICH, Ohio JOHN B. SHADEGG, Arizona ROD R. BLAGOJEVICH, Illinois STEVEN C. LATOURETTE, Ohio DANNY K. DAVIS, Illinois MARSHALL ‘‘MARK’’ SANFORD, South JOHN F. TIERNEY, Massachusetts Carolina JIM TURNER, Texas JOHN E.
  • Holding the Presidency Accountable: a Path Forward for Journalists and Lawyers

    Holding the Presidency Accountable: a Path Forward for Journalists and Lawyers

    \\jciprod01\productn\H\HLP\12-1\HLP101.txt unknown Seq: 1 5-MAR-18 9:39 Holding the Presidency Accountable: A Path Forward for Journalists and Lawyers Bruce Brown* & Selina MacLaren** INTRODUCTION Hardly a week went by in 2017 without President Donald Trump railing against the news media, calling for a crackdown on “leaks”1 and smearing the press as the “enemy of the American people.”2 As a candidate, Mr. Trump threatened to sue the New York Times in response to an article docu- menting allegations of sexual misconduct.3 Following the election, Mr. Trump angrily criticized the news site BuzzFeed, calling it a “failing pile of garbage.”4 As president, he refused to answer a question posed by CNN’s Jim Acosta during a press conference, labeling the network “very fake news,”5 and has retweeted images6 and videos7 that appear to glorify vio- lence toward CNN. Several documentation projects have emerged in re- sponse to this presidency to track attacks on the press.8 * Executive Director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press (RCFP). J.D., Yale Law School; M.A., Harvard University; B.A., Stanford University. Mr. Brown has been a lecturer at the University of Virginia School of Law and co-director of its First Amendment Clinic. ** Stanton Foundation Free Press/National Security Legal Fellow at RCFP. J.D., Univer- sity of Chicago Law School; B.A., University of California, Berkeley. 1 See, e.g., Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump), TWITTER (Aug. 5, 2017, 6:58 PM), https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/893969438139191296 [https://perma.cc/B62X- 4ET9]; Donald J.
  • Oversight of the Federal Bureau of Investigation Hearing Committee on the Judiciary House of Representatives

    Oversight of the Federal Bureau of Investigation Hearing Committee on the Judiciary House of Representatives

    OVERSIGHT OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION SEPTEMBER 28, 2016 Serial No. 114–91 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://judiciary.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 22–125 PDF WASHINGTON : 2016 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY BOB GOODLATTE, Virginia, Chairman F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR., JOHN CONYERS, JR., Michigan Wisconsin JERROLD NADLER, New York LAMAR S. SMITH, Texas ZOE LOFGREN, California STEVE CHABOT, Ohio SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas DARRELL E. ISSA, California STEVE COHEN, Tennessee J. RANDY FORBES, Virginia HENRY C. ‘‘HANK’’ JOHNSON, JR., STEVE KING, Iowa Georgia TRENT FRANKS, Arizona PEDRO R. PIERLUISI, Puerto Rico LOUIE GOHMERT, Texas JUDY CHU, California JIM JORDAN, Ohio TED DEUTCH, Florida TED POE, Texas LUIS V. GUTIERREZ, Illinois JASON CHAFFETZ, Utah KAREN BASS, California TOM MARINO, Pennsylvania CEDRIC RICHMOND, Louisiana TREY GOWDY, South Carolina SUZAN DelBENE, Washington RAU´ L LABRADOR, Idaho HAKEEM JEFFRIES, New York BLAKE FARENTHOLD, Texas DAVID N. CICILLINE, Rhode Island DOUG COLLINS, Georgia SCOTT PETERS, California RON DeSANTIS, Florida MIMI WALTERS, California KEN BUCK, Colorado JOHN RATCLIFFE, Texas DAVE TROTT, Michigan MIKE BISHOP, Michigan SHELLEY HUSBAND, Chief of Staff & General Counsel PERRY APELBAUM, Minority Staff Director & Chief Counsel (II) C O N T E N T S SEPTEMBER 28, 2016 Page OPENING STATEMENTS The Honorable Bob Goodlatte, a Representative in Congress from the State of Virginia, and Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary ................................
  • View Complaint

    View Complaint

    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK Vincent Forras, on behalf of ) himself and all others of and in ) the City of New York, County ) of New York, similarly ) COMPLAINT situated, ) ) Index No. Plaintiff, ) v., ) ) Feisal Abdul Rauf, and ) Cordoba House/Park51, ) Cordoba Initiative, Soho ) Properties, and all other aliases ) known and unknown Defendants. FACTS COMMON TO ALLEGATIONS The Lead Plaintiff, Vincent Forras, and other members of the class similarly situated as set forth below, complain of the Defendants on behalf of himself and these other members of the class of the City of New York, County of New York, similarly situated, and alleges as follows: 1. Defendant Feisel Abdul Rauf (hereafter ―Feisel‖) is an individual and on information and belief, at all times mentioned herein resides in the City of New York, State of New York. 2. Defendant Cordoba House/Park51 is an entity whose true and correct form is unknown to the Lead Plaintiff at this time. On information and belief, at all times mentioned herein Cordoba House/Park51’s principal place of business is and was located at 51 Park Place, in the city of New York, State of New York. 3. Defendant Cordoba Initiative is an entity whose true and correct form is not fully known to the Lead Plaintiff and other members of the class at this time. On information and belief, at all times mentioned herein Cordoba Initiative’s principal place of business is and was located at 475 Riverside Drive, Suite 248 in the City of New York, State of New York.