Local Biodiversity Strategy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Local Biodiversity Strategy Local Biodiversity Strategy Camden Local Government Area Prepared for Camden Council 16 May 2013 Camden Council Local Biodiversity Strategy DOCUMENT TRACKING ITEM DETAIL Project Name Camden Council Local Biodiversity Strategy Project Number 12SYDPLA-022 Steve Dimitriadis Project Manager 02 8536 8650 L6, 299 Sussex St, Sydney, NSW, Australia Prepared by Steve Dimitriadis, Jennie Powell, Beth Medway Approved by Steven House Status FINAL Version Number 1 Last saved on 10 October 2013 This report should be cited as ‘Eco Logical Australia 2013. Camden Council Local Biodiversity Strategy. Prepared for Camden Council.’ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document has been prepared by Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd with support from staff at Camden Council. Disclaimer This document may only be used for the purpose for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the contract between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd and Camden Council. The scope of services was defined in consultation with Camden Council, by time and budgetary constraints imposed by the client, and the availability of reports and other data on the subject area. Changes to available information, legislation and schedules are made on an ongoing basis and readers should obtain up to date information. Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report and its supporting material by any third party. Information provided is not intended to be a substitute for site specific assessment or legal advice in relation to any matter. Unauthorised use of this report in any form is prohibited. © ECO LOGICAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ii Camden Council Local Biodiversity Strategy Contents Executive summary ............................................................................................................................... vii 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Need for a local biodiversity strategy ............................................................................................... 1 1.2 What is biodiversity .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Why biodiversity matters .................................................................................................................. 2 1.4 Threats to biodiversity ...................................................................................................................... 2 1.5 Vision ............................................................................................................................................... 3 1.6 How does this strategy support the vision ....................................................................................... 3 1.7 Measuring success .......................................................................................................................... 4 2 Biodiversity in Camden LGA ..................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Landscape character ....................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Flora ................................................................................................................................................. 5 2.3 Fauna ............................................................................................................................................... 7 2.4 Water quality and aquatic ecosystems ............................................................................................ 8 2.5 Aboriginal culture and biodiversity ................................................................................................... 9 2.6 Recent biodiversity management................................................................................................... 10 2.7 Council’s revoked Natural Assets Policy ....................................................................................... 10 3 Planning and policy framework .............................................................................................. 13 3.1 Conventions and treaties ............................................................................................................... 13 3.2 Legislation ...................................................................................................................................... 13 3.3 Environmental Planning Instruments and policies ......................................................................... 16 3.4 Biobanking and biocertification ...................................................................................................... 20 3.4.1 What is biobanking ..................................................................................................................... 20 3.4.2 Council’s biobanking obligations and opportunities ................................................................... 20 3.4.3 What is biocertification ................................................................................................................ 21 3.4.4 Biodiversity certification of Growth Centres ................................................................................ 21 3.5 Environmentally sensitive lands map overlay ................................................................................ 22 3.6 Need to Train Council staff ............................................................................................................ 22 4 Priority areas ............................................................................................................................. 25 4.1 Biodiversity corridors ...................................................................................................................... 25 4.1.1 What are Biodiversity Corridors? ................................................................................................ 25 4.1.2 Biodiversity Corridors role and function ...................................................................................... 25 © ECO LOGICAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD iii Camden Council Local Biodiversity Strategy 4.2 Biodiversity Corridors in Camden .................................................................................................. 27 4.2.1 South Creek ................................................................................................................................ 27 4.2.2 Western Hills............................................................................................................................... 27 4.2.3 Nepean River .............................................................................................................................. 27 4.2.4 Scenic Hills ................................................................................................................................. 28 4.2.5 Harrington-Wivenhoe & Spring Farm Corridor ........................................................................... 28 4.2.6 Local Biodiversity Corridors ........................................................................................................ 28 4.3 Biodiversity Corridor MASTERPlanning ........................................................................................ 28 4.4 Prioritisation of Corridor Masterplanning ....................................................................................... 29 5 Council land management ....................................................................................................... 35 5.1.1 Management of high conservation value Council reserves ........................................................ 35 5.1.2 Training ....................................................................................................................................... 35 5.1.3 Assessment of biobanking potential of Council reserves ........................................................... 35 5.1.4 Riparian management funding options ....................................................................................... 35 5.1.5 Management of Threatened Flora Species within Council Road Reserves ............................... 36 6 Prioritised actions .................................................................................................................... 37 7 Conclusions .............................................................................................................................. 40 References ............................................................................................................................................. 41 Appendix A: Codes for vegetation community conditions ............................................................... 42 Appendix B: Major Weeds in Camden LGA and threats to biodiversity ......................................... 43 Appendix C: Flora species ................................................................................................................... 47 Appendix D: Fauna ................................................................................................................................ 76 Appendix D: Key Threatening Processes ........................................................................................... 86 List of Figures Figure 1: Vegetation communities in Camden LGA (refer to
Recommended publications
  • Maurício Zanovello Schuster Weed Community in Integrated Crop
    81,9(56,'$'()('(5$/'23$5$1È 0$85Ë&,2=$129(//26&+867(5 :(('&20081,7<,1,17(*5$7('&523/,9(672&.6<67(06 &85,7,%$ MAURÍCIO ZANOVELLO SCHUSTER WEED COMMUNITY IN INTEGRATED CROP-LIVESTOCK SYSTEMS Tese apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agronomia, Área de Concentração em Produção Vegetal, Departamento de Fitotecnia e Fitossanitarismo, Setor de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal do Paraná, como parte das exigências para obtenção do título de Doutor em Ciências. Comitê de orientação: Dr. Anibal de Moraes, Dr. Adelino Pelissari, Dr. Sebastião Brasil Campos Lustosa, Dra. Claudete Lang, Dr. Paulo Faccio de Cesar Carvalho, Dr. Kent Harrison, Dr. Mark Sulc e Dr. François Gastal. CURITIBA 2018 FICHA CATALOGRÁFICA ELABORADA PELO SISTEMA DE BIBLIOTECAS/UFPR - BIBLIOTECA DE CIÊNCIAS AGRÁRIAS, DOUGLAS ALEX JANKOSKI CRB 9/1167 COM OS DADOS FORNECIDOS PELO(A) AUTOR(A) Schuster, Maurício Zanovello Weed community in integrated crop-livestock systems / S395w Maurício Zanovello Schuster. - Curitiba, 2018. 147 f. : il., grafs., tabs. Tese (Doutorado) - Universidade Federal do Paraná. Setor de Ciências Agrárias, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agronomia - (Produção Vegetal). Orientador: Anibal de Moraes 1. Erva daninha - Controle biológico. 2. Rotação de cultivos. 3. Plantas - População. 4. Agropecuária. 5. Dinâmica de vegetação. I. Moraes, Anibal de. II. Título. III. Universidade Federal do Paraná. CDU 632.51:631.582 Dedicatória: Dedico este trabalho a Deus, aos meus pais João Eloi e Jandira, a minha irmã Larissa e a minha noiva Maiara. AGRADECIMENTO Agradeço, acima de tudo, a Deus. Aos meus Pais João Eloi Schuster e Jandira Zanovello Schuster, a minha irmã Larissa Zanovello Schuster e a minha noiva Maiara Massiroli pelo amor e apoio incondicional.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Perils and Pitfalls of Dataset Assembly in Ecology: A
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal NeoBiota 34: 1–20 (2017) Taxonomic perils and pitfalls of dataset assembly in ecology... 1 doi: 10.3897/neobiota.34.11139 RESEARCH ARTICLE NeoBiota http://neobiota.pensoft.net Advancing research on alien species and biological invasions Taxonomic perils and pitfalls of dataset assembly in ecology: a case study of the naturalized Asteraceae in Australia Brad R. Murray1, Leigh J. Martin1, Megan L. Phillips1, Petr Pyšek2,3 1 School of Life Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, NSW 2007, Australia 2 Institute of Botany, Department of Invasion Ecology, The Czech Academy of Sciences, CZ-252 43 Průhonice, Czech Re- public 3 Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, CZ-128 44 Prague, Czech Republic Corresponding author: Brad R. Murray ([email protected]) Academic editor: I. Kühn | Received 10 November 2016 | Accepted 13 January 2017 | Published 3 February 2017 Citation: Murray BR, Martin LJ, Phillips ML, Pyšek P (2017) Taxonomic perils and pitfalls of dataset assembly in ecology: a case study of the naturalized Asteraceae in Australia. NeoBiota 34: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.34.11139 Abstract The value of plant ecological datasets with hundreds or thousands of species is principally determined by the taxonomic accuracy of their plant names. However, combining existing lists of species to assemble a harmonized dataset that is clean of taxonomic errors can be a difficult task for non-taxonomists. Here, we describe the range of taxonomic difficulties likely to be encountered during dataset assembly and pre- sent an easy-to-use taxonomic cleaning protocol aimed at assisting researchers not familiar with the finer details of taxonomic cleaning.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Evolution of Achenial Trichomes In
    Luebert & al. • Achenial trichomes in the Lucilia-group (Asteraceae) TAXON 66 (5) • October 2017: 1184–1199 Phylogeny and evolution of achenial trichomes in the Lucilia-group (Asteraceae: Gnaphalieae) and their systematic significance Federico Luebert,1,2,3 Andrés Moreira-Muñoz,4 Katharina Wilke2 & Michael O. Dillon5 1 Freie Universität Berlin, Institut für Biologie, Botanik, Altensteinstraße 6, 14195 Berlin, Germany 2 Universität Bonn, Nees-Institut für Biodiversität der Pflanzen, Meckenheimer Allee 170, 53115 Bonn, Germany 3 Universidad de Chile, Departamento de Silvicultura y Conservación de la Naturaleza, Santiago, Chile 4 Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Instituto de Geografía, Avenida Brasil 2241, Valparaíso, Chile 5 The Field Museum, Integrative Research Center, 1400 South Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60605, U.S.A. Author for correspondence: Federico Luebert, [email protected] ORCID FL, http://orcid.org/0000­0003­2251­4056; MOD, http://orcid.org/0000­0002­7512­0766 DOI https://doi.org/10.12705/665.11 Abstract The Gnaphalieae (Asteraceae) are a cosmopolitan tribe with around 185 genera and 2000 species. The New World is one of the centers of diversity of the tribe with 24 genera and over 100 species, most of which form a clade called the Lucilia­group with 21 genera. However, the generic classification of the Lucilia­group has been controversial with no agreement on delimitation or circumscription of genera. Especially controversial has been the taxonomic value of achenial trichomes and molecular studies have shown equivocal results so far. The major aims of this paper are to provide a nearly complete phylogeny of the Lucilia­ group at generic level and to discuss the evolutionary trends and taxonomic significance of achenial trichome morphology.
    [Show full text]
  • An Empirical Assessment of a Single Family‐Wide Hybrid Capture Locus
    APPLICATION ARTICLE An empirical assessment of a single family-wide hybrid capture locus set at multiple evolutionary timescales in Asteraceae Katy E. Jones1,14 , Tomáš Fér2 , Roswitha E. Schmickl2,3 , Rebecca B. Dikow4 , Vicki A. Funk5 , Sonia Herrando-Moraira6 , Paul R. Johnston7,8,9, Norbert Kilian1 , Carolina M. Siniscalchi10,11 , Alfonso Susanna6 , Marek Slovák2,12 , Ramhari Thapa10,11, Linda E. Watson13 , and Jennifer R. Mandel10,11 Manuscript received 27 February 2019; revision accepted PREMISE: Hybrid capture with high-throughput sequencing (Hyb-Seq) is a powerful tool for 5 September 2019. evolutionary studies. The applicability of an Asteraceae family-specific Hyb-Seq probe set and 1 Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin, Freie the outcomes of different phylogenetic analyses are investigated here. Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Str. 6–8, 14195 Berlin, Germany 2 Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, METHODS: Hyb-Seq data from 112 Asteraceae samples were organized into groups at differ- Benátská 2, CZ 12800 Prague, Czech Republic ent taxonomic levels (tribe, genus, and species). For each group, data sets of non-paralogous 3 Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, CZ loci were built and proportions of parsimony informative characters estimated. The impacts 25243 Průhonice, Czech Republic of analyzing alternative data sets, removing long branches, and type of analysis on tree reso- 4 Data Science Lab, Office of the Chief Information lution and inferred topologies were investigated in tribe Cichorieae. Officer, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20013-7012, USA RESULTS: Alignments of the Asteraceae family-wide Hyb-Seq locus set were parsimony infor- 5 Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural mative at all taxonomic levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Plantfamilie ASTERACEAE: 6
    ISSN 0254-3486 = SA Tydskrif vir Natuurwetenskap en Tegnologie 23, no. 1 & 2 2004 35 Algemene artikel Die plantfamilie ASTERACEAE: 6. Die subfamilie Asteroideae P.P.J. Herman Nasionale Botaniese Instituut, Privaat sak X101, Pretoria, 0001 e-pos: [email protected] UITTREKSEL Die tribusse van die subfamilie Asteroideae word meer volledig in hierdie artikel beskryf. Die genusse wat aan dié tribusse behoort word gelys en hulle verspreiding aangedui. ABSTRACT The plant family Asteraceae: 6. The subfamily Asteroideae. The tribes of the subfamily Asteroideae are described in this article. Genera belonging to the different tribes are listed and their distribution given. INLEIDING Tribus ANTHEMIDEAE Cass. Hierdie artikel is die laaste in die reeks oor die plantfamilie Verteenwoordigers van hierdie tribus is gewoonlik aromaties, Asteraceae.1-5 In die vorige artikel is die klassifikasie bokant byvoorbeeld Artemisia afra (wilde-als), Eriocephalus-soorte, familievlak asook die indeling van die familie Asteraceae in sub- Pentzia-soorte.4 Die feit dat hulle aromaties is, beteken dat hulle families en tribusse bespreek.5 Hierdie artikel handel oor die baie chemiese stowwe bevat. Hierdie stowwe word dikwels subfamilie Asteroideae van die familie Asteraceae, met ’n aangewend vir medisyne (Artemisia) of insekgif (Tanacetum).4 bespreking van die tribusse en die genusse wat aan die verskillende Verder is hulle blaartjies gewoonlik fyn verdeeld en selfs by dié tribusse behoort. Die ‘edelweiss’ wat in die musiekblyspel The met onverdeelde blaartjies, is die blaartjies klein en naaldvormig sound of music besing word, behoort aan die tribus Gnaphalieae (Erica-agtig). Die pappus bestaan gewoonlik uit vry of vergroeide van die subfamilie Asteroideae.
    [Show full text]
  • Gamochaeta Pensylvanica (Asteraceae) Is Established in the New York Flora
    Atha, D., R. Alvarez, D. Feeser, M. Feder, Z. Wang, and R. Kelly. 2016. Gamochaeta pensylvanica (Asteraceae) is established in the New York flora. Phytoneuron 2016-22: 1–4. Published 3 March 2016. ISSN 2153 733X GAMOCHAETA PENSYLVANICA (ASTERACEAE) IS ESTABLISHED IN THE NEW YORK FLORA DANIEL ATHA Center for Conservation Strategy New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Blvd. Bronx, New York 10458 Author for correspondence: [email protected] REGINA ALVAREZ Queensborough Community College 222-05 56th Ave. Bayside, New York 11364 DAN FEESER Institute for Urban Parks, Central Park Conservancy 14 East 60th St. New York, New York 10022 MICHAEL FEDER New York City Department of Parks and Recreation 85-20 66th Rd. Rego Park, New York 11374 ZIHAO WANG Center for Conservation Strategy, New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Blvd. Bronx, New York 10458 RICH KELLY Long Island Botanical Society 622 South 8th St. New Hyde Park, New York 11040 ABSTRACT Recent field work and study of herbarium specimens document Gamochaeta pensylvanica as an established element in the spontaneous flora of New York State. The species was first collected in New York in 1938, but the sole specimen was misidentified as Gamochaeta purpurea . Gamochaeta pensylvanica is reported here with specimens from Bronx, Kings, and Queens counties and observations from Nassau County. A key based on living and preserved specimens distinguishing G. purpurea from G. pensylvanica is provided. Of the 12 species of Gamochaeta recognized in North America (Nesom, 2006), only G. purpurea (L.) Cabrera has previously been reported for New York state (Nesom 2006; Weldy et al. 2015), where it has been considered rare (S3) (Weldy et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Community Monitoring at Ocmulgee National Monument, 2011
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Vegetation Community Monitoring at Ocmulgee National Monument, 2011 Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SECN/NRDS—2014/702 ON THE COVER Duck potato (Sagittaria latifolia) at Ocmulgee National Monument. Photograph by: Sarah C. Heath, SECN Botanist. Vegetation Community Monitoring at Ocmulgee National Monument, 2011 Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SECN/NRDS—2014/702 Sarah Corbett Heath1 Michael W. Byrne2 1USDI National Park Service Southeast Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network Cumberland Island National Seashore 101 Wheeler Street Saint Marys, Georgia 31558 2USDI National Park Service Southeast Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network 135 Phoenix Road Athens, Georgia 30605 September 2014 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Data Series is intended for the timely release of basic data sets and data summaries. Care has been taken to assure accuracy of raw data values, but a thorough analysis and interpretation of the data has not been completed. Consequently, the initial analyses of data in this report are provisional and subject to change. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant Inventory and Plant Community Classification for Ninety Six National Historic Site
    VASCULAR PLANT INVENTORY AND PLANT COMMUNITY CLASSIFICATION FOR NINETY SIX NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE Report for the Vertebrate and Vascular Plant Inventories: Appalachian Highlands and Cumberland/Piedmont Network Prepared by NatureServe for the National Park Service Southeast Regional Office November 2003 NatureServe Ninety Six National Historic Site ii NatureServe is a non-profit organization providing the scientific knowledge that forms the basis for effective conservation action. A NatureServe Technical Report Prepared for the National Park Service under Cooperative Agreement H 5028 01 0435. Citation: White, Jr., Rickie D. and Tom Govus. 2003. Vascular Plant Inventory and Plant Community Classification for Ninety Six National Historic Site. Durham, North Carolina: NatureServe. © 2003 NatureServe NatureServe 6114 Fayetteville Road, Suite 109 Durham, NC 27713 919-484-7857 International Headquarters 1101 Wilson Boulevard, 15th Floor Arlington, Virginia 22209 www.natureserve.org National Park Service Southeast Regional Office Atlanta Federal Center 1924 Building 100 Alabama Street, S.W. Atlanta, GA 30303 The view and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Government. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not consitute their endorsement by the U.S. Government. This report consists of the main report along with a series of appendices with information about the plants and plant communities found at the site. Electronic files have been provided to the National Park Service in addition to hard copies. Current information on all communities described here can be found on NatureServe Explorer at www.natureserve.org/explorer. Cover photo: Rain lily (Zephranthes atamasca) blooming in April 2002 along Ninety Six Creek.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification, Diversity, and Distribution of Chilean Asteraceae
    Diversity and Distributions, (Diversity Distrib.) (2007) 13, 818–828 Blackwell Publishing Ltd BIODIVERSITY Classification, diversity, and distribution RESEARCH of Chilean Asteraceae: implications for biogeography and conservation Andrés Moreira-Muñoz1 and Mélica Muñoz-Schick2* 1Geographical Institute, University ABSTRACT Erlangen-Nürnberg, Kochstr. 4/4, 91054 This paper provides a synopsis of the Chilean Asteraceae genera according to the Erlangen, Germany, 2Museo Nacional de most recent classification. Asteraceae is the richest family within the native Chilean Historia Natural, Casilla 787, Santiago, Chile flora, with a total of 121 genera and c. 863 species, currently classified in 18 tribes. The genera are distributed along the whole latitudinal gradient in Chile, with a centre of richness at 33°–34° S. Almost one-third of the genera show small to medium-small ranges of distribution, while two-thirds have medium-large to large latitudinal ranges of distribution. Of the 115 mainland genera, 46% have their main distribution in the central Mediterranean zone between 27°–37° S. Also of the mainland genera, 53% occupy both coastal and Andean environments, while 33% can be considered as strictly Andean and 20% as strictly coastal genera. The biogeographical analysis of relationships allows the distinction of several floristic elements and generalized tracks: the most marked floristic element is the Neotropical, followed by the anti- tropical and the endemic element. The biogeographical analysis provides important insights into the origin and evolution of the Chilean Asteraceae flora. The presence of many localized and endemic taxa has direct conservation implications. Keywords *Correspondence: Mélica Muñoz-Schick, Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, Casilla 787, Compositae, phylogeny, phytogeography, panbiogeography, synopsis Chilean Santiago, Chile.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the Oklahoma Native Plant Society, Volume 9, December
    ISSN 1536-7738 Oklahoma Native Plant Record Journal of the Oklahoma Native Plant Society Volume 9, December 2009 1 Oklahoma Native Plant Record Journal of the Oklahoma Native Plant Society 2435 South Peoria Tulsa, Oklahoma 74114 Volume 9, December 2009 ISSN 1536-7738 Managing Editor: Sheila Strawn Technical Editor: Erin Miller Production Editor: Paula Shryock Electronic Production Editor: Chadwick Cox Technical Advisor: Bruce Hoagland Editorial Assistant: Patricia Folley The purpose of ONPS is to encourage the study, protection, propagation, appreciation and use of the native plants of Oklahoma. Membership in ONPS is open to any person who supports the aims of the Society. ONPS offers individual, student, family, and life memberships. 2009 Officers and Board Members President: Lynn Michael ONPS Service Award Chair: Sue Amstutz Vice-President: Gloria Caddell Historian: Sharon McCain Secretary: Paula Shryock Librarian: Bonnie Winchester Treasurer: Mary Korthase Website Manager: Chadwick Cox Membership Database: Tina Julich Photo Poster Curators: Past President: Kim Shannon Sue Amstutz & Marilyn Stewart Board Members: Color Oklahoma Chair: Tina Julich Monica Macklin Conservation Chair: Chadwick Cox Constance Murray Mailings Chair: Karen Haworth Stanley Rice Merchandise Chair: Susan Chambers Bruce Smith Nominating Chair: Paula Shryock Marilyn Stewart Photography Contest Chair: Tina Julich Ron Tyrl Publicity Chairs: Central Chapter Chair: Jeannie Coley Kim Shannon & Marilyn Stewart Cross-timbers Chapter Chair: Wildflower Workshop Chair: Paul Richardson Constance Murray Mycology Chapter Chair: Sheila Strawn Website: www.usao.edu/~onps/ Northeast Chapter Chair: Sue Amstutz Cover photo: Lobelia cardinalis L. Gaillardia Editor: Chadwick Cox Cardinal flower, courtesy of Marion Harriet Barclay Award Chair: Homier, taken at Horseshoe Bend in Rahmona Thompson Beaver’s Bend State Park, Anne Long Award Chair: Patricia Folley September 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Compositae Newsletter 2, 1975) Have at Last Been Published As Heywood, V.H., Harborne, J.B
    ft Ml ' fft'-A Lb!V CCMPCSIT4E # NEWSLETTER Number Six June 1978 Charles Jeffrey, Editor, Herbarium, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AB, U.K. Financial support of the NEWSLETTER is generously provided by Otto Koeltz Antiquariat, P.O. Box I36O, 624 Koenigstein-Taunus, B.R.D. EDITORIAL The proceedings of the Reading Symposium (Compositae Newsletter 2, 1975) have at last been published as Heywood, V.H., Harborne, J.B. & Turner, B.L. (eds.), The Biology and Chemistry of the Compositae , Academic Press, London, New York and San Francisco , 1978, price £55 (#107.50)* In conjunction with the papers by Carlquist, S., Tribal Interrelationships and Phylogeny of the Asteraceae (Aliso 8: 446-492, 1976), Cronquist, A., The " Compositae Revisited (Brittonia 29: 137-153, 1977) and Wagenits, G. t Systematics and Phylogeny of the Compositae (PI. Syst. Evol. 125: 29-46, 1976), it gives the first overall review of the family since Bentham's time. On the evidence provided, the infrafamilial classification proposed by Wagenitz is most strongly supported, to which that proposed by Carlquist is very similar, except for his placing of the Eupatorieae in the Cichorioideae instead of the Asteroideae . In the previous Newsletter, a list of workers on Compositae and their research projects was published. New and revised entries to this list are welcomed by the editor; please provide your name, institution, institutional address, new or current research projects, recent publications, intended expeditions and study visits, and any requests for material or information. Articles, book reviews, notices of meetings, and any news from individuals or institutions that may be useful to synantherologists anywhere are also invited.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora and Vegetation of the Huascarán National Park, Ancash, Peru: With
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1988 Flora and vegetation of the Huascarán National Park, Ancash, Peru: with preliminary taxonomic studies for a manual of the flora David Nelson Smith Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, David Nelson, "Flora and vegetation of the Huascarán National Park, Ancash, Peru: with preliminary taxonomic studies for a manual of the flora " (1988). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 8891. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/8891 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photo­ graph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
    [Show full text]