Offshore Lobster and Jonah Crab Integrated Fisheries Management Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Offshore Lobster and Jonah Crab Integrated Fisheries Management Plan Offshore Lobster and Jonah Crab Integrated Fisheries Management Plan Maritimes Region Jonah Crab (Cancer borealis) American Lobster (Homarus americanus) Updated September 2016 Foreword This document constitutes the Integrated Fisheries Management Plan (IFMP), developed in conjunction with licence holders for the Maritimes Region offshore lobster fleet in Lobster Fishing Area (LFA) 41. It is based on an ecosystem approach, employs co-management, and continues the shared stewardship process used in this fishery to ensure sustainability of the fishery. Where DFO is responsible for implementing obligations under land claims agreements, the IFMP will be implemented in a manner consistent with these obligations. In the event that an IFMP is inconsistent with obligations under land claims agreements, the provisions of the land claims agreements will prevail to the extent of the inconsistency. This IFMP is not a legally binding instrument which can form the basis of a legal challenge. The IFMP can be modified at any time and does not fetter the Minister’s discretionary powers set out in the Fisheries Act. The Minister can, for reasons of conservation or for any other valid reasons, modify any provision of the IFMP in accordance with the powers granted pursuant to the Fisheries Act. ____________________ Doug Wentzell Regional Director Fisheries Management Maritimes Region Table of Contents 1. Overview of the Fishery 6 1.1. Introduction 6 1.2. History 6 1.3. Current Participants 8 1.4. Location of the Fishery 8 1.5. Time Frame of the Fishery 9 1.6. Landings 9 1.7. Market and Economics 10 1.8. Consultative Process 11 1.9. Harvesting Controls: TAC, the Number of Licences and Carapace Size 12 2. Lobster and Jonah Crab Stock Status 13 2.1. Lobster Stock Status 13 2.2. Species Interactions and Interactions with Other Fisheries 15 2.3. Lobster Stock Assessment 16 2.4. Jonah Crab Stock Status 18 2.5. Species Interactions and Interactions with Other Fisheries 19 2.6. Jonah Crab Stock Assessment 19 2.7. Offshore Jonah Crab Landings 19 2.8. Prospects for Offshore Jonah Crab Fishery 20 2.9. Monitoring and Research Programs: (Proposed) 21 3. Current Research Issues 22 3.1. Browns Bank Closed Area 22 3.2. Exploration for Offshore Jonah Crab and Lobster in LFA 41 NAFO Division 4W 22 4. Long-term Objectives for the Fishery (Appendix IV, May 2011) 23 5. General Management Objectives (Appendix IV, May 2011) 23 5.1. Conservation/Sustainability of the LFA 41 Resource (Appendix V, May 2014) 23 5.2. Protection of Adjacent Inshore Fisheries 24 5.3. Maintain the Long-term Viability of the Existing Fleet 24 5.4. Increased Movement towards Co-management of this Fishery 24 5.5. Environmentally Responsible Fishing 24 5.6. Species at Risk 24 5.7. Other Domestic Considerations 25 5.8. International Considerations 26 6. Current Management Issues 26 6.1. Protection of Browns Bank 26 6.2. Continuation of Co-management Approaches 26 6.3. Environmentally Responsible Fishing 27 6.4. Other Domestic Issues 27 6.5. International Issues 28 7. Specific Management Measures 28 7.1. Gear 28 7.2. Season 29 7.3. Dockside Monitoring 29 8. Access and Allocation 29 8.1. Sharing Arrangements 29 8.2. Quotas and Allocations 30 9. Monitoring and Enforcement Issues, Strategies and Action 31 9.1. General Enforcement Issues 31 9.2. Enforcement Strategies 32 9.3. Enforcement Action 32 Appendix 1: OLJCAC MEMBERSHIP 33 Appendix II: OLJCAC Terms of Reference 34 Purpose 34 Scope 34 Administration 34 Appendix III: OLJCMB Terms of Reference 36 Purpose 36 Functions and Responsibilities 36 Meetings 36 Subcommittees 36 Voting Procedures 36 Minutes of Meetings 36 Expenses 36 Attendance 37 Membership 37 Quorum 37 Appendix IV: Offshore Lobster IFMP Objectives 38 Appendix V: Precautionary Approach for Offshore Lobster 39 Indicators of Stock Health 39 Justifications and Rationale 42 Uncertainty 44 Harvest Control Rules 44 Appendix VI: List of Amendments 47 1. OVERVIEW OF THE FISHERY 1.1. Introduction The Offshore Lobster and Jonah Crab Integrated Fishery Management Plan evolved from the 1970s through a series of public policy decisions and operational plans. The current plan was published in 2011. It contains provisions for the inclusion of Ecosystem Management Objectives through an “evergreen” (annually extending the Plan) review approach for this plan. The intent of this plan is to provide the policy framework to guide the operational management of the offshore Lobster and Jonah Crab fisheries. 1.2. History 1.2.1. Beginnings: 1971-1975 Licences and Area As a result of the growth of an offshore lobster fishery in the United States (US) during the latter part of the 1960s, similar Canadian interest in an offshore lobster fishery on Georges Bank began. In July 1971, the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) announced the opening of a Canadian offshore lobster fishery. The fishery was authorized for a geographical area termed “Lobster District A”, which is the area seaward from the offshore lobster boundary line - 50 nautical miles from the geographical base line for the 12 mile limit. This district extended along the entire outer portion of the Scotian Shelf. In 1970, the US government imposed restrictions on the importation of swordfish due to increasing consumer standards on mercury levels in food products. This approach negatively affected the Canadian swordfish longline fishery, which exported the majority of its landings to the US market. In an effort to provide an alternative fishery option to the Canadian swordfish longline fleet, the Canadian government offered an opportunity to the 56 swordfish longline licence holders, predominantly based in Southwest Nova Scotia (SWNS), to fish offshore lobsters. However, few of the swordfish vessel licence holders opted to acquire an offshore lobster licence and, by 1972, only six swordfish vessels had entered the new fishery, with two additional licences entering the fishery in 1976. The awarding of the two additional licences caused serious reservations among the SWNS inshore lobster industry as concerns were expressed that the offshore effort may negatively impact the viability of the inshore lobster fishery. The Canadian offshore lobster fishery initially occurred on the known lobster grounds of southern Georges Bank. This provided an obvious geographical separation between the inshore and offshore fleet activity. Exploratory efforts indicated concentrations of lobster along the eastern and southwestern portion of Browns Bank which contributed to offshore catches from all areas increasing to 678 tonnes (t) by 1976. Since many inshore fishermen believed that the offshore harvesting effort could be disrupting the migration of lobsters to the inshore grounds, they expressed serious concerns on the impact that this new offshore lobster effort may have on their established fishery. The average 6 landings for inshore SWNS lobster decreased from 4036 t during 1970-1976 to 3120 t for the period of 1976-1980. 1.2.2. Restrictions: 1976 While the inshore lobster fleet’s concerns of the potential impact of the offshore lobster fleet on lobster migrations could not be supported with the data available at the time, DFO responded by applying additional restrictions on the offshore lobster fishery. These restrictions included: (1) freezing the number of offshore lobster licences at eight, (2) limiting the number of traps at 1000 traps/vessel, (3) applying a 10 month season (to be chosen by the vessel owner) and (4) a 408 t Total Allowable Catch (TAC) on the 4X portion of Lobster Fishing Area (LFA) 41, which included the area closest to the inshore fleet, Brown’s Bank area. Only six of the eight licences were permitted to fish in this part of the offshore area, with the remaining two licences restricted to Georges Bank. All eight licences had fishing access to Georges Bank, including 5Ze, with no quota limits. 1.2.3. Closed Area: 1979 In 1979, DFO established a rectangular regulatory “closed” area on Browns Bank, identified as LFA 40, to protect lobster brood stock (see reference maps, Illustrations II and III). The closure continues to remain in effect, encompassing all portions of the Bank shallower than 50 fathoms and straddles the inshore/offshore line with approximately 57% of its area in LFA 34 and 43% in LFA 41. This closure did not affect other gear sectors at that time. 1.2.4. The “Hague” Line Affects the Fishery: 1984 During the period of 1977-1984, the 408 t TAC remained in effect. In October 1984, an International Court of Justice (ICJ) decision established the official boundary between Canada and the US in the Gulf of Maine known as “the Hague Line”. The ICJ ruling subsequently displaced the American offshore lobster effort from areas now defined as Canadian waters, principally in Crowell Basin and Georges Basin. Average annual American catches from these two combined areas were estimated at 200 t. The Canadian offshore lobster allocations were based on: (1) the 4X 408t TAC; (2) the average annual Canadian 5Z (Georges Bank, Georges Basin and part of the Northeast Channel) lobster catches; and (3) 100t from the estimated American catch from Crowell and Georges Basins and Georges Bank. 1.2.5. Enterprise Allocation Program Introduced: 1985/86 The combination of (1) a small marginally profitable offshore lobster fleet, (2) a major trans-boundary ruling by the ICJ in 1984 and (3) increasing conservation and economic concerns from the inshore fleet relating to impact of this fishery on their own fishery, generated an environment requiring a collaborative conservation strategy involving DFO and the offshore lobster fleet. In response, the Offshore Lobster Advisory Committee (OLAC) was formed in 1985. This Committee was originally comprised of the offshore lobster licence holders, the Nova Scotia Department of Agriculture and Fisheries and DFO. 7 In 1986, OLAC recommended an initial three-year trial Enterprise Allocation (EA) Offshore Lobster Management Plan for this fishery, which provided licence holders with the equivalent of transferable quotas.
Recommended publications
  • Seafood Watch Seafood Report: Crabs Blue Crab
    Seafood Watch Seafood Report: Crabs Volume I Blue Crab Callinectes sapidus Writer/Editor:AliceCascorbi Fisheries Research Analyst Monterey Bay Aquarium Additional Research: Heather Blough Audubon Living Oceans Program Final 14 February 2004 Seafood Watch® Blue Crab Report February 14, 2004 About Seafood Watch® and the Seafood Reports Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch® program evaluates the ecological sustainability of wild-caught and farmed seafood commonly found in the United States marketplace. Seafood Watch® defines sustainable seafood as originating from sources, whether wild-caught or farmed, which can maintain or increase production in the long- term without jeopardizing the structure or function of affected ecosystems. Seafood Watch® makes its science-based recommendations available to the public in the form of regional pocket guides that can be downloaded from the Internet (seafoodwatch.org) or obtained from the Seafood Watch® program by emailing [email protected]. The program’s goals are to raise awareness of important ocean conservation issues and empower seafood consumers and businesses to make choices for healthy oceans. Each sustainability recommendation on the regional pocket guides is supported by a Seafood Report. Each report synthesizes and analyzes the most current ecological, fisheries and ecosystem science on a species, then evaluates this information against the program’s conservation ethic to arrive at a recommendation of “Best Choices”, “Good Alternatives” or “Avoid.” The detailed evaluation methodology is available upon request. In producing the Seafood Reports, Seafood Watch® seeks out research published in academic, peer-reviewed journals whenever possible. Other sources of information include government technical publications, fishery management plans and supporting documents, and other scientific reviews of ecological sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change and Fisheries: Policy, Trade and Sustainable Nal of Fisheries Management 22:852-862
    Climate Change and Alaska Fisheries TERRY JOHNSON Alaska Sea Grant University of Alaska Fairbanks 2016 ISBN 978-1-56612-187-3 http://doi.org/10.4027/ccaf.2016 MAB-67 $10.00 Credits Alaska Sea Grant is supported by the US Department of Commerce, NOAA National Sea Grant, grant NA14OAR4170079 (A/152-32) and by the University of Alaska Fairbanks with state funds. Sea Grant is a partnership with public and private sectors combining research, education, and extension. This national network of universities meets changing environmental and Alaska Sea Grant economic needs of people in coastal, ocean, and Great Lakes University of Alaska Fairbanks regions. Fairbanks, Alaska 99775-5040 Funding for this project was provided by the Alaska Center for Climate Assessment and Policy (ACCAP). Cover photo by (888) 789-0090 Deborah Mercy. alaskaseagrant.org TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract .................................................................................................... 2 Take-home messages ...................................................................... 2 Introduction............................................................................................. 3 1. Ocean temperature and circulation ................................................ 4 2. Ocean acidification ............................................................................ 9 3. Invasive species, harmful algal blooms, and disease-causing pathogens .................................................... 12 4. Fisheries effects—groundfish and crab ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • New Hampshire Fish and Game Department NEW HAMPSHIRE SALTWATER FISHING 2021 DIGEST
    New Hampshire Fish and Game Department NEW HAMPSHIRE SALTWATER FISHING 2021 DIGEST Fish the Coast! The Official New Hampshire Digest of Regulations fishnh.com A Legacy of High Performance NEW! SARAGOSA SW REEL Infinity Drive Technology increases this reel’s winding torque under load compared to its TERAMAR XX SW RODS predecessor to give anglers a distinct advantage Shimano’s Spiral X and Hi-Power X technologies enhance power over hard fighting game fish. Combined with transmission through the rod blank for increased casting distance a battle-tested rigid HAGANE Body that won’t and lifting power as well as reduced blank twist during tough flex under immense loads and the battles. Whether fishing for stripers in the Northeast, reds in the HAGANE Gear to create eternally smooth reeling. Southeast or Southwest, or salmon on the West Coast, there is a Cross Carbon drag and X-Protect offer high-level Teramar XX rod to fit your fishing needs. water resistance to create long-lasting durability. No matter whether anglers are fishing inshore or offshore, jigging for bottom fish or casting baits at tailing fish, they can count on — just like they always have — the Saragosa SW to stay smooth no matter the conditions and perform when TREVALA PX RODS needed most. The bar is raised for saltwater spinning reels. Incorporates a redesigned rod blank with Shimano’s Hi-Power X reinforcing technology to increase overall strength and control while also enhancing rod twist resistance when jigging or fighting a fish. Save the date! FISHINGFEST® 2021 ~ April 1-4 Quality components for enhanced performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwestern Nova Scotia Snow Crab
    Fisheries Pêches and Oceans et Océans DFO Science Maritimes Region Stock Status Report C3-65(2000) Southwestern Nova Scotia Snow Crab Summary Background Snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio) is a crustacean like • In 1999, the catch was 110 t. Catch rates lobster and shrimp, with a flat almost circular body increased in 1998 and 1999 in the and five pairs of spider-like legs. The hard outer Halifax-Lunenburg area. shell is periodically shed in a process called molting. • After molting, crab have a soft shell for a period of A trap survey indicated that adult crab time and are therefore called soft-shelled crab. were present in concentrations in two Unlike lobster, male and female snow crab do not areas, both with cold water bottom continue to molt throughout their lives. Females stop temperature. growing after the molt in which they acquire a wider • Because southwestern Nova Scotia is at abdomen for carrying eggs. This occurs at shell widths less than 95 mm. Male snow crab stop the southern limit of snow crab growing after the molt in which they acquire distribution, it is expected that this relatively large claws on the first pair of legs. This fishery will be sporadic. can occur at shell widths as small as 40 mm. Female crab produce eggs that are carried beneath the abdomen for approximately 2 years. The eggs hatch in late spring or early summer and the tiny newly The Fishery hatched crab larvae spend 12-15 weeks free floating in the water. At the end of this period, they settle on Harvesting of snow crab, Chionoecetes the bottom.
    [Show full text]
  • Wholesale Market Profiles for Alaska Groundfish and Crab Fisheries
    JANUARY 2020 Wholesale Market Profiles for Alaska Groundfish and FisheriesCrab Wholesale Market Profiles for Alaska Groundfish and Crab Fisheries JANUARY 2020 JANUARY Prepared by: McDowell Group Authors and Contributions: From NOAA-NMFS’ Alaska Fisheries Science Center: Ben Fissel (PI, project oversight, project design, and editor), Brian Garber-Yonts (editor). From McDowell Group, Inc.: Jim Calvin (project oversight and editor), Dan Lesh (lead author/ analyst), Garrett Evridge (author/analyst) , Joe Jacobson (author/analyst), Paul Strickler (author/analyst). From Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission: Bob Ryznar (project oversight and sub-contractor management), Jean Lee (data compilation and analysis) This report was produced and funded by the NOAA-NMFS’ Alaska Fisheries Science Center. Funding was awarded through a competitive contract to the Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission and McDowell Group, Inc. The analysis was conducted during the winter of 2018 and spring of 2019, based primarily on 2017 harvest and market data. A final review by staff from NOAA-NMFS’ Alaska Fisheries Science Center was completed in June 2019 and the document was finalized in March 2016. Data throughout the report was compiled in November 2018. Revisions to source data after this time may not be reflect in this report. Typically, revisions to economic fisheries data are not substantial and data presented here accurately reflects the trends in the analyzed markets. For data sourced from NMFS and AKFIN the reader should refer to the Economic Status Report of the Groundfish Fisheries Off Alaska, 2017 (https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/data/2017-economic-status-groundfish-fisheries-alaska) and Economic Status Report of the BSAI King and Tanner Crab Fisheries Off Alaska, 2018 (https://www.fisheries.noaa.
    [Show full text]
  • Lobster Review
    Seafood Watch Seafood Report American lobster Homarus americanus (Image © Monterey Bay Aquarium) Northeast Region Final Report February 2, 2006 Matthew Elliott Independent Consultant Monterey Bay Aquarium American Lobster About Seafood Watch® and the Seafood Reports Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch® program evaluates the ecological sustainability of wild-caught and farmed seafood commonly found in the United States marketplace. Seafood Watch® defines sustainable seafood as originating from sources, whether wild-caught or farmed, which can maintain or increase production in the long-term without jeopardizing the structure or function of affected ecosystems. Seafood Watch® makes its science-based recommendations available to the public in the form of regional pocket guides that can be downloaded from the Internet (seafoodwatch.org) or obtained from the Seafood Watch® program by emailing [email protected]. The program’s goals are to raise awareness of important ocean conservation issues and empower seafood consumers and businesses to make choices for healthy oceans. Each sustainability recommendation on the regional pocket guides is supported by a Seafood Report. Each report synthesizes and analyzes the most current ecological, fisheries and ecosystem science on a species, then evaluates this information against the program’s conservation ethic to arrive at a recommendation of “Best Choices,” “Good Alternatives,” or “Avoid.” The detailed evaluation methodology is available upon request. In producing the Seafood Reports, Seafood Watch® seeks out research published in academic, peer-reviewed journals whenever possible. Other sources of information include government technical publications, fishery management plans and supporting documents, and other scientific reviews of ecological sustainability. Seafood Watch® Fisheries Research Analysts also communicate regularly with ecologists, fisheries and aquaculture scientists, and members of industry and conservation organizations when evaluating fisheries and aquaculture practices.
    [Show full text]
  • IE JD) II IB3 IL IE C Iri a IB3 §
    /1 IE JD) II IB3 IL IE CIRi A IB3 § FISHERY LEAFLET No. 471 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE BUREAU OF COMMERCIAL FISHERIES WASHINGTON 25, D. C. ,,4 FlA' .[ - T(\45 L4' .E A~ - TR - _ r.E r T'" r '-.I T • .n SCRM'fS, STOt,( c'ae AS S A ES A A RAr.GE - F .01' D' GEAR - D P ~(TS, cRA. TS KING CRAB RANGE - ALASK A GEAR - TANGL E NETS , OTT ER TR A 5 by Charles H. Walburg Fishery Research Biologist Beaufort , North Carolina Four species of crabs possessing the qualifications of an important food resource - abundance, wholesomeness, good flavor, and a ready market are found in the marine waters of the United States and Alaska. These are the blue crab of the Atlantic coast and Gulf of Mexico, the rock crab of New England, the Dungeness crab of the Pacific coast, and the king crab of Alaska. A few other species of good quality and of sufficient abundance also support small fisheries. Among these are the Jonah crab of New England and the stone crab of the south Atlantic and Gulf coasts. Atlantic and Gulf Coasts THE BLUE CRAB, Ca11inectes sapidus, next to the shrimp and lobster, is the most valuable crustacean of our waters. Its range is from Cape Cod to Mexico. It is found in greatest abundance from Delaware Bay to Texas, and the region of Chesapeake Bay is especially famous for its great numbers of blue crabs. The favorite habitat of the blue crab includes estuarine waters such as bays, sounds , and channels at t he mouths of coastal rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • 5.2 Barents Sea Ecoregion – Fisheries Overview
    ICES Fisheries Overviews Barents Sea Ecoregion Published 29 November 2019 5.2 Barents Sea Ecoregion – Fisheries overview Table of contents Executive summary ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Who is fishing ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Catches over time ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Description of the fisheries........................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Fisheries management ............................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Status of the fishery resources ..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 MARINE FISHERIES INFORMATION CIRCULAR Connecticut Commercial and Recreational Fishing
    Connecticut Department of ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 2021 MARINE FISHERIES INFORMATION CIRCULAR Connecticut Commercial and Recreational Fishing INTRODUCTION IMPORTANT NOTE: CHANGES MAY BE MADE DURING THE YEAR THAT WON’T BE REFLECTED IN THIS CIRCULAR. Commercial fishery licensing statutes were amended in 2015 (Public Act 15-52) creating some new license types and mandating annual renewal of moratorium licenses commercial fishing vessel permits and quota managed species endorsements. PLEASE SEE Page 1 General Provisions for important details. This circular is provided to inform commercial and recreational fishermen about Connecticut statutes and regulations that govern the taking of lobsters, marine and anadromous finfish, squid, whelk (conch) and crabs using commercial fishing gear or for commercial purposes. For information pertaining to oysters, clams and bay scallops, contact local town clerks or the Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Aquaculture (203-874-0696). The circular is intended to be a layman's summary. No attempt is made to employ the exact wording of statutes or regulations or to provide a complete listing of them. Interpretation or explanation of the material contained herein may be obtained from a Connecticut Environmental Conservation Police Officer, or from the following sources: DEEP Marine Fisheries Program (860-434-6043) DEEP Marine Environmental Conservation Police (860-434-9840) For legal purposes, please consult the most recent: • Commissioner Declarations at www.ct.gov/deep/FisheriesDeclarations, • Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies at https://eregulations.ct.gov/eRegsPortal/ and • Connecticut General Statutes at http://www.cga.ct.gov/current/pub/titles.htm. License applications and licenses are obtained by writing the DEEP Licensing and Revenue Unit, 79 Elm Street, First Floor, Hartford, Connecticut 06106, or by calling 860-424-3105.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Fish, Big Impact: Managing a Crucial Link in Ocean Food Webs
    little fish BIG IMPACT Managing a crucial link in ocean food webs A report from the Lenfest Forage Fish Task Force The Lenfest Ocean Program invests in scientific research on the environmental, economic, and social impacts of fishing, fisheries management, and aquaculture. Supported research projects result in peer-reviewed publications in leading scientific journals. The Program works with the scientists to ensure that research results are delivered effectively to decision makers and the public, who can take action based on the findings. The program was established in 2004 by the Lenfest Foundation and is managed by the Pew Charitable Trusts (www.lenfestocean.org, Twitter handle: @LenfestOcean). The Institute for Ocean Conservation Science (IOCS) is part of the Stony Brook University School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences. It is dedicated to advancing ocean conservation through science. IOCS conducts world-class scientific research that increases knowledge about critical threats to oceans and their inhabitants, provides the foundation for smarter ocean policy, and establishes new frameworks for improved ocean conservation. Suggested citation: Pikitch, E., Boersma, P.D., Boyd, I.L., Conover, D.O., Cury, P., Essington, T., Heppell, S.S., Houde, E.D., Mangel, M., Pauly, D., Plagányi, É., Sainsbury, K., and Steneck, R.S. 2012. Little Fish, Big Impact: Managing a Crucial Link in Ocean Food Webs. Lenfest Ocean Program. Washington, DC. 108 pp. Cover photo illustration: shoal of forage fish (center), surrounded by (clockwise from top), humpback whale, Cape gannet, Steller sea lions, Atlantic puffins, sardines and black-legged kittiwake. Credits Cover (center) and title page: © Jason Pickering/SeaPics.com Banner, pages ii–1: © Brandon Cole Design: Janin/Cliff Design Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5: Commercial and Recreational Fisheries
    Ocean Special Area Management Plan Chapter 5: Commercial and Recreational Fisheries Table of Contents 500 Introduction.............................................................................................................................9 510 Marine Fisheries Resources in the Ocean SAMP Area.....................................................12 510.1 Species Included in this Chapter ..........................................................................12 510.1.1 Species important to commercial and recreational fisheries.....................12 510.1.2 Forage fish ................................................................................................15 510.1.3 Threatened and endangered species and species of concern ....................15 510.2 Life History, Habitat, and Fishery of Commercially and Recreationally Important Species............................................................................................................17 510.2.1 American lobster.......................................................................................17 510.2.2 Atlantic bonito ..........................................................................................19 510.2.3 Atlantic cod...............................................................................................20 510.2.4 Atlantic herring .........................................................................................21 510.2.5 Atlantic mackerel......................................................................................23 510.2.6 Atlantic
    [Show full text]
  • Spiny Lobster Amendment 4
    AMENDMENT 4 TO THE FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SPINY LOBSTER IN THE GULF OF MEXICO AND SOUTH ATLANTIC INCLUDING THE REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT prepared by the South Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Councils SEPTEMBER 1994 Financial assistance for producing this Amendment was provided by grant funds from the National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, under Public Law 94-265, the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE LIST OF ACTIONS IN SPINY LOBSTER AMENDMENT 4 ........................................... i REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW FOR SPINY LOBSTER AMENDMENT 4 ..................... ii 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED.................................................................................. 1 2.0 ALTERNATIVESINCLUDINGTHEPROPOSEDACTION .....................................5 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT.......................................................................... 7 A. Optimum Yield.....................................................................................7 B. Definition of Overfishing......................................................................... 7 C. Commercial Fishery...........................................:.................,................. 8 D. Recreational Fishery .............................................................................. 9 E. Status of the Stocks ............................................................................... 16 ~~-· 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ...............................:;:-.:
    [Show full text]