DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:Astro-Ph/0601163V2 25 Apr 2006 Rpittpstuigl Using Typeset Preprint 2018 25, August Version Draft 1 2 M Aafo MP(Ent Ta.20;Seglet Spergel 2003; Al

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:Astro-Ph/0601163V2 25 Apr 2006 Rpittpstuigl Using Typeset Preprint 2018 25, August Version Draft 1 2 M Aafo MP(Ent Ta.20;Seglet Spergel 2003; Al Draft version August 25, 2018 A Preprint typeset using L TEX style emulateapj v. 11/12/01 DARK ENERGY CONSTRAINTS FROM BARYON ACOUSTIC OSCILLATIONS Yun Wang1 Draft version August 25, 2018 ABSTRACT Baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) in the galaxy power spectrum allows us to extract the scale of the comoving sound horizon at recombination, a cosmological standard ruler accurately determined by the cosmic microwave background anisotropy data. We examine various issues important in the use of 2 2 BAO to probe dark energy. We find that assuming a flat universe, and priors on Ωm, Ωmh , and Ωbh ′ as expected from the Planck mission, the constraints on dark energy parameters (w0, w ) scale much less steeply with survey area than (area)−1/2 for a given redshift range. The constraints on the dark −1/2 energy density ρX (z), however, do scale roughly with (area) due to the strong correlation between H(z) and Ωm (which reduces the effect of priors on Ωm). Dark energy constraints from BAO are very sensitive to the assumed linear scale of matter clustering and the redshift accuracy of the survey. For −1 a BAO survey with 0.5 z 2, σ(R)=0.4 (corresponding to kmax(z =0)= 0.086 h Mpc ), and ≤ ′≤ 2 σz/(1 + z)=0.001, (σw0 , σw ) =(0.115, 0.183) and (0.069, 0.104) for survey areas of 1000 (deg) and 10000 (deg)2 respectively. We find that it is critical to minimize the bias in the scale estimates in order to derive reliable dark energy constraints. For a 1000 (10000) square degree BAO survey, a 1σ bias in ′ ′ ln H(z) leads to a 2σ (3σ) bias in w . The bias in w due to the same scale bias from ln DA(z) is slightly smaller and opposite in sign. The results from this paper will be useful in assessing different proposed BAO surveys and guiding the design of optimal dark energy detection strategies. Subject headings: Cosmology 1. introduction al. 2003) and Planck 2. The most intriguing mystery in cosmology today is the The “wavelength” of the baryonic acoustic oscillations in k-space is determined by k = 2π/s, where s is the nature of the dark energy that is driving the acceler- A comoving sound horizon at the drag epoch (when baryons ated expansion of the universe as evidenced by supernova 3 (Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter et al. 1999) and other are released from the Compton drag of the photons ), td ∞ data. Although current observational data are consistent −1 cs with a cosmological constant (see for example, Wang & s = csdt/a = H0 dz (1) 0 zd H(z) Tegmark (2004, 2005); Daly & Djorgovski (2005); Jassal, Z Z Bagla, & Padmanabhan (2005)), viable dark energy mod- The sound speed is els abound. See for example, Freese et al. (1987); Linde 1 cs = , (1987); Peebles & Ratra (1988); Wetterich (1988); Frieman 3(1 + Rb) et al. (1995); Caldwell, Dave & Steinhardt (1998); Sahni & b 3ρb 2 −4 −1 Habib (1998); Parker & Raval (1999); Dvali, Gabadadze, R = p = 31.5Ωbh (TCMB/2.7K) (z/1000) , (2) 4ργ arXiv:astro-ph/0601163v2 25 Apr 2006 & Porrati (2000); Mersini, Bastero-Gil, & Kanti (2001); Freese & Lewis (2002); Carroll et al. (2004); Onemli & and the Hubble parameter is Woodard (2004); Alam & Sahni (2005); Cai, Gong, & 3 4 2 H(z)= Ωm(1 + z) +Ωrad(1 + z) +Ωk(1 + z) +ΩX X(z), Wang (2005); Cardone et al. (2005); Kolb, Matarrese, & (3) Riotto (2005); Martineau & Brandenberger (2005). Pad- p with X(z) ρX (z)/ρX (0) denoting the dark energy den- manabhan (2003) and Peebles & Ratra (2003) contain re- sity function.≡ For a cosmological constant, X(z) = 1 and views of many models. Ω =Ω . Since z 1, we have The powerful complementarity of the cosmic microwave X Λ d ≫ −1 ad anisotropy (CMB) and galaxy survey data in precision cos- H cs s 0 da mology has long been noted (see for example, Bahcall et ≃ √Ωm 0 √a + aeq al. (1999), Eisenstein, Hu, & Tegmark (1999), and Wang, Z b b b Spergel, & Strauss (1999)). An important development 1 2c 1+ Rd + Rd + Req in this complementarity is to use the baryonic acoustic = ln ,(4) Ω H2 b q q b oscillations (BAO) in the galaxy power spectrum as a cos- m 0 3zeqReq 1+ Req mological standard ruler to probe dark energy (Blake & where “d”p and “eq”q refer to the drag epochq and matter- Glazebrook 2003; Seo & Eisenstein 2003), made possible radiation equality respectively, with zd 1089, and zeq = by accurate determination of the standard ruler scale by 2.5 104Ω h2(T /2.7K)−4. Hence∼ the “wavelength” CMB data from WMAP (Bennett et al. 2003; Spergel et × m CMB of the baryonic oscillations depends very strongly on Ωm, 1 Department of Physics & Astronomy, Univ. of Oklahoma, 440 W Brooks St., Norman, OK 73019; email: [email protected] (Jan 8, 2006) 2 See Planck mission blue book at http://www.rssd.esa.int/SA/PLANCK/docs/Bluebook-ESA-SCI(2005)1.pdf 3 2 For Ωbh . 0.03, the drag epoch follows the last scattering of the photons (Eisenstein & Hu 1998). 1 2 Yun Wang but has negligible dependence on dark energy (which only “wavelength” of the baryonic oscillations can be recovered. became important recently, at redshifts a few and less). It Note that in our calculation, Eq.(6) is only used to get an can therefore be used as a standard ruler to probe dark estimate of how accurately the power spectrum is deter- energy. mined, and not used to derive constraints on dark energy The systematic effects of BAO as a standard ruler are: and cosmological parameters. bias between luminous matter and matter distributions, Assuming that the likelihood function for the band pow- nonlinear effects, and redshift distortions (Blake & Glaze- ers of a galaxy redshift survey is Gaussian, the Fisher ma- brook 2003; Seo & Eisenstein 2003). Cosmological N-body trix can be approximated as (Tegmark 1997) simulations are required to quantify these effects (Angulo kmax ∂ ln P (k) ∂ ln P (k) dk3 et al. 2005; Seo & Eisenstein 2005; Springel et al. 2005; k Fij = Veff ( ) 3 (7) White 2005). Fisher matrix formalism is useful in investi- kmin ∂pi ∂pj 2 (2π) gating the impact of various effects and assumptions that Z can be parametrized in the observed galaxy power spec- where the derivatives are evaluated at parameter values of trum (Seo & Eisenstein 2003). the fiducial model and Veff is the effective volume of the In this paper, we examine various issues important in survey the use of baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) to probe 2 n(r)P (k,µ) dark energy using the Fisher matrix formalism. In par- V (k,µ)= dr3 eff n(r)P (k,µ)+1 ticular, we extend the work of Seo & Eisenstein (2003) Z ′ 2 by deriving the biases in dark energy parameters (w0, w ) nP (k,µ) = V , (8) due to systematic errors in the estimated scales. Through- nP (k,µ)+1 survey out this paper, we assume spatial flatness as motivated by inflation and consistent with current CMB data. where the comoving number density n has been taken to Sec.2 describes the method used in our calculations. We be constant in position. Here µ = k ˆr/k, with ˆr denoting present results in Sec.3 and summarize in Sec.4. the unit vector along the line of sight;· k is the wavevec- tor with k = k. Following Blake & Glazebrook (2003) 2. | | the method and Seo & Eisenstein (2003), we take kmin = 0, and kmax 2.1. Error estimation using Fisher matrix given by requiring that σ(R) . 0.5 for R = π/(2kmax) (to ensure that we are only considering the linear regime). In estimating the expected errors in dark energy param- The observed power spectrum is reconstructed using a eters, we follow Seo & Eisenstein (2003) in using the Fisher particular reference cosmology, including the effects of bias matrix formalism (see discussion in Sec.4). We provide de- and redshift distortions (Seo & Eisenstein 2003): tails from our calculations for the convenience of readers 2 2 who wish to reproduce our results. [D (z) ]2 H(z) k The comoving sizes of an object or feature at redshift P (k , k )= A ref b2 1+ β k obs ref⊥ refk 2 k2 + k2 · z in line-of-sight (rk) and transverse (r⊥) directions are [DA(z)] H(z)ref ⊥ k ! related to the observed sizes ∆z and ∆θ by the Hubble G(z) 2 parameter H(z) and angular diameter distance DA(z): P (k z =0)+ P .(9) · G(z = 0) matter | shot c∆z r = , r =(1+ z)D (z)∆θ, (5) k H(z) ⊥ A The values in the reference cosmology are denoted by the The true scale of the baryonic acoustic oscillations (the co- subscript “ref”, while those in the true cosmology have no moving sound horizon at recombination) is known. Hence subscript. Note that if we can measure the “wavelength” of the baryonic acous- kref⊥ = k⊥DA(z)/DA(z)ref , krefk = kkH(z)ref /H(z). tic oscillations in the radial direction in successive redshift (10) slices, we obtain estimates of the cosmic expansion history The linear redshift distortion β is computed from the as a free function of z. While the measurement of the bias b for fiducial values of the observed galaxy cluster- “wavelength” of the baryonic acoustic oscillations in the 0.6 ing, β = Ωm /b. G(z) is the linear growth factor. We transverse direction gives us an estimate of the angular normalize the power spectrum to CMB data from COBE diameter distance DA(z) as a free function of z.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ΦYAST ΦLYER the Homer L
    THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA!SPRING 2010 ΦYAST ΦLYER The Homer L. Dodge Department of Physics and Astronomy Volume 18, Number 1 Homer L. Dodge Department associate professor and immediately became a of Physics and Astronomy highly valued member of our Department—for his internationally known experimental and Celebrates a Century! computational research in chemical physics; for his teaching (while here he won three awards for In 1909, William P. Haseman was appointed the excellence in teaching, and to date he remains the first chair of the university’s Department of only physicist the astronomers have allowed to Physics and Astronomy. Now, 100 years later, we celebrate the start of the department with a celebration this fall for alumni and friends of the department as well as faculty and students, with two main events planned. The first is a production of Michael Frayn’s play Copenhagen by the OU School of Drama. The second is a public lecture by the well-known cosmologist Andrei Linde of Stanford University. The play, presented in OU’s Weizenhoffer L to R: Greg Parker, Tom Mi!er, Xifan Liu. Theater, concerns the famous 1941 meeting Photo credit: John Cowan between Niels Bohr, played by New York actor teach their introductory course for non-majors); Paul Austin, and Werner Heisenberg, played by and for his service to the department—notably Tom Orr, director of OU’s School of Drama. The spending many weekends with Michael Morrison part of Bohr’s wife, Margrethe, has yet to be cast. and Stu Ryan cleaning out the attic, which Performances of Copenhagen will run the contained detritus that apparently pre-dated Isaac evenings of Thursday through Saturday, Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1802.01539V3 [Astro-Ph.IM] 24 Jan 2019
    DRAFT VERSION JANUARY 25, 2019 A 1Typeset using LTEX default style in AASTeX61 ATLAS PROBE: BREAKTHROUGH SCIENCE OF GALAXY EVOLUTION, COSMOLOGY, MILKY WAY, AND THE SOLAR SYSTEM ∗ YUN WANG ,1 MASSIMO ROBBERTO,2, 3 MARK DICKINSON,4 LYNNE A. HILLENBRAND,5 WESLEY FRASER,6 PETER BEHROOZI,7 JARLE BRINCHMANN,8, 9 CHIA-HSUN CHUANG,10 ANDREA CIMATTI,11, 12 ROBERT CONTENT,13 EMANUELE DADDI,14 HENRY C. FERGUSON,2 CHRISTOPHER HIRATA,15 MICHAEL J. HUDSON,16 J. DAVY KIRKPATRICK,1 ALVARO ORSI,17 RUSSELL RYAN,2 ALICE SHAPLEY,18 MARIO BALLARDINI,19, 20 ROBERT BARKHOUSER,3 JAMES BARTLETT,21 ROBERT BENJAMIN,22 RANGA CHARY,1 CHARLIE CONROY,23 MEGAN DONAHUE,24 OLIVIER DORÉ,21 PETER EISENHARDT,21 KARL GLAZEBROOK,25 GEORGE HELOU,1 SANGEETA MALHOTRA,26 LAURO MOSCARDINI,11, 20, 27 JEFFREY A. NEWMAN,28 ZORAN NINKOV,29 MICHAEL RESSLER,21 JAMES RHOADS,26 JASON RHODES,21 DANIEL SCOLNIC,30 STEPHEN SMEE,3 FRANCESCO VALENTINO,31 AND RISA H. WECHSLER10, 32 1IPAC, California Institute of Technology, Mail Code 314-6, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125 2Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218 3Dept. of Physics & Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218 4NOAO, 950 North Cherry Ave., Tucson, AZ 85719 5Dept. of Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, MC 249-17, 1200 East California Blvd, Pasadena CA 91125 6School of Mathematics and Physics, Queen’s University Belfast, University Road, BT7 1NN, Belfast, United Kingdom 7Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 N Cherry Ave, Tucson, AZ 85719 8Leiden Observatory, Leiden Univ., P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Pos(DSU 2012)016 Ce
    Probing the Nature of Cosmic Acceleration PoS(DSU 2012)016 Yun Wang∗ Homer L. Dodge Department of Physics & Astronomy, Univ. of Oklahoma, 440 W Brooks St., Norman, OK 73019 E-mail: [email protected] The cause for the observed acceleration in the expansion of the universe is unknown, and referred to as “dark energy” for convenience. Dark energy could be an unknown energy component, or a modification of Einstein’s general relativity. This dictates the measurements that are optimal in unveiling the nature of dark energy: the cosmic expansion history, and the growth history of cosmic large scale structure. Type Ia supernovae, galaxy clustering, and weak lensing are generally considered the most powerful observational probes of dark energy. Due to page limit, I will only examine Type Ia supernovae and galaxy clustering as dark energy probes, and discuss the recent results and future prospects. VIII International Workshop on the Dark Side of the Universe, June 10-15, 2012 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil ∗Speaker. c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence. http://pos.sissa.it/ Probing the Nature of Cosmic Acceleration Yun Wang (a) PoS(DSU 2012)016 (b) Figure 1: Left panel: Expansion history of the universe measured from current data [7]. Data used: Cosmic microwave background anisotropy (CMB) data from WMAP 7 year observations [8]; 472 Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) (compiled by [9], including data from the Supernova Legacy Survey (SNLS) [9], the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) [10], as well as nearby SNe Ia [36]); galaxy clustering measurements from Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Luminous Red Galaxies (LRGs) [11], 69 Gamma Ray Bursts [14], and the latest Hubble constant (H0) measurement using the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) [16].
    [Show full text]
  • Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Beyond
    Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 000–000 (0000) Printed 7 August 2012 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) Galaxy clustering as dark energy probe: baryon acoustic oscillations and beyond Yun Wang⋆ Homer L. Dodge Department of Physics & Astronomy, Univ. of Oklahoma, 440 W Brooks St., Norman, OK 73019, U.S.A. 7 August 2012 ABSTRACT Galaxy clustering is one of the most powerful probes of the true nature of the observed cosmic acceleration. It contains baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) that are cosmological standard rulers calibrated by the cosmic microwave background anisotropy data. The BAO allows us to measure the cosmic expansion history directly. Beyond the BAO, the full shape of galaxy clustering (either in the measured galaxy power spectrum or the galaxy correlation function) provides significantly more cosmological information, and in particular, allows us to test deviations from general relativity via the redshift space distortions. Here we introduce the basic ideas and analysis techniques for using galaxy clustering data to constrain dark energy and test gravity. We examine the critical issues, current status, as well as future prospects. s Since the 1980s, galaxy redshift surveys have been used to sk sH(z), s⊥ , (1) map the large scale structure in the universe, and constrain cosmo- ∝ ∝ DA(z) logical parameters. Galaxy redshift surveys are powerful as dark where s is the sound horizon scale at the drag epoch, and the angu- energy probe, since they can allow us to measure the cosmic ex- lar diameter distance DA(z) = r(z)/(1 + z), with r(z) denoting pansion history H(z) through the measurement of baryon acous- the comoving distance given by tic oscillations (BAO) in the galaxy distribution, and the growth −1 −1/2 1/2 history of cosmic large scale structure f (z) through independent r(z)= cH Ωk sinn[ Ωk Γ(z)], (2) g 0 | | | | measurements of redshift-space distortions and the bias factor be- z dz′ tween the distribution of galaxies and that of matter (Wang 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the Universe in 60 Minutes
    The History of the Universe in 60 Minutes Max Tegmark, MIT 100dpi Cosmology timeline: 500 BC 2000 AD Overduin & Priester 2001, astro-ph/0101484 1900 Cosmology timeline: 1910 s e Einstein’s theory of gravity i 1920 p o Expanding Universe theoretically possible (Friedmann) r t o s Universe is expanding (Hubble) i y 1930 n g a o l d o s u 1940 y m o e s r v o g r c Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (Gamow) k g u y c n s 1950 n Cosmic Microwave Background predicted (Alpher & Herman) g a i o t i s o y f b l s i n g i o e h r e o l v l s e 1960 m a l o y d s D 1st quasar discovered (Schmidt) a e g o w m r n o c o s l Cosmic Microwave Background detected (Penzias & Wilson) o r t y o i o s c t c x 1970 i e a m a a r t l s m i v o a o v f c o c y i a G n g a r 1980 r r m o Inflation invented (Guth, Linde, Albrecht & Steinhardt) e g l e n s t o s a o p CfA Galaxy Redshift Survey k u u a C m l m e S 1990 s y C CMB anisotropies detected (COBE) o L W c m y Dark energy discovered with supernovae (2 teams), CMB peaks detected c g 2000 Weak lensing detected (4 teams) o 1 l WMAP CMB, SDSS galaxy clustering 2dF galaxy clustering 2 o Planck CMB satellite CMB polarization detected (DASI) m 2010 s o c CMBPOL satellite? JDEM? JWST? LSST? SKA? n o 2020 i s i c e r P Flyabout + SDSS movie Max Tegmark Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Fall 2002
    "All The ν's That's Fit To Print" ΦYAST ΦLYER The Department of Physics & Astronomy The University of Oklahoma Volume 11, Number 1 Fall, 2002 Dick Henry, Editor; Sonya Brindle, Production Website: http://www.nhn.ou.edu D0 WORKSHOP REVIEW About 230 experimental particle physicists gathered at OU from July 8­12 for the annual D0 (Dee­Zero) Workshop. The participants in the workshop are all members of the D0 collaboration at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory near Chicago. The D0 experiment observes the collisions of protons and anti­protons at the Tevatron Collider. Debris from the high­energy collisions reveal clues about the basic particles and forces in the universe. The collaboration consists of more than 400 physicists from over 20 countries. Many of the participants at the workshop had never been to Oklahoma before. Three OU physicists who are active researchers on the D0 experiment hosted this year's workshop: Mike Strauss, Phil Gutierrez, and Brad Abbott. The workshop is a time when the collaboration can assess the current status of the experiment and plan for the future. Such reflection was crucial this year in the wake of a major upgrade to the D0 detector and to the Tevatron collider. Plenary sessions, parallel sessions, and working groups were located throughout Nielsen Hall and Dale Hall as the participants developed strategies for analyzing and understanding the data being collected in their detector. In addition to time spent working on physics, the workshop participants got a good look at many of OU's treasures, including the Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History, and the university's history of science collection.
    [Show full text]
  • [ Astronomy and Astrophysics ]
    [ Astronomy and Astrophysics ] he members of the Astronomy and Astrophysics group are the quasar accretion disk structure. Henry studies the distribution of among the leaders of their chosen areas of research. We chemical elements in spiral galaxies like the Milky Way in order to study Tare one of the largest astrophysics groups within a physics their origin and evolution. department in the country. The research conducted in our group is Extrasolar Planets and Circumstellar Disks. Wisniewski uses interwoven and dynamic, with six complementary focus areas. multi-wavelength observational techniques, using ground- and Supernovae. Supernovae are the explosions of dying stars. But in their space-based facilities, to investigate the structure, evolution, and death they give clues to the size and fate of the universe. Our group is origin of circumstellar disks. He studies spatially resolved images of among the top few in supernova research. Baron and Kilic are interested protoplanetary and debris disks to search for morphological indicators in the systematics of how supernovae explode and what kinds of stars for the presence of young exoplanets in these systems. Kilic studies lead to different supernovae. Baron studies the spectra of the expanding the chemical composition of Earth-like planets around evolved stars by supernova atmosphere to determine physical conditions and chemical observing the remnants of such planets, debris disks. abundances in the ejecta. Kilic observes compact binary star systems Nucleosynthesis. Henry studies the chemical abundances of a variety of that may lead to supernovae explosions. Some of these binary systems emission line objects with the goal of understanding stellar production are among the strongest gravitational wave sources known.
    [Show full text]
  • Dark Energy from a Space-Based Platform
    Dark Energy from a Space-Based Platform A White Paper Submitted to the Decadal Survey Committee Dominic Benford Goddard Space Flight Center Gary Bernstein University of Pennsylvania Susana Deustua Space Telescope Science Institute Dan Eisenstein University of Arizona Richard Ellis CalTech Neil Gehrels Goddard Space Flight Center Chris Hirata CalTech Tod Lauer National Optical Astronomy Observatories Gary Melnick Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Harvey Moseley Goddard Space Flight Center Saul Perlmutter University of California Berkeley, LBNL Adam Riess Johns Hopkins University, STScI David Schlegel Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Yun Wang University of Oklahoma Contact Author: Adam Riess Johns Hopkins University 3400 N. Charles Street Baltimore, MD 21218 (410) 516-4474 [email protected] Science Frontier Panel: Cosmology and Fundamental Physics (CFP) Relevant Mission: Joint Dark Energy Mission (JDEM) February 2009 1. Introduction In 1998 two teams of astronomers observed high-redshift supernovae to measure the deceleration of the expansion of the universe, a keystone of the cosmological model. They were amazed to find instead that the expansion is accelerating (Riess et al. 1998, Perlmutter et al. 1999). Additional measurements using independent techniques and observables including the cosmic microwave background (most precisely by WMAP), large-scale structure and its variations, x-ray clusters, and the Integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) effect have come to the same stunning conclusion. Even the most conservative interpretation of the acceleration is staggering; for our best theory of gravity, General Relativity, to remain valid we must invoke the presence of a mysterious “dark energy” comprising 70% of the universe whose gravity is repulsive. The phenomenon of dark energy offers a rare clue for questions at the nexus of many of the deepest and thorniest problems in physics, cosmology and astrophysics.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter of Interest Illuminating the Dark Universe With
    Snowmass2021 - Letter of Interest Illuminating the Dark Universe with ATLAS Probe Thematic Areas: (check all that apply /) (CF1) Dark Matter: Particle Like (CF2) Dark Matter: Wavelike (CF3) Dark Matter: Cosmic Probes (CF4) Dark Energy and Cosmic Acceleration: The Modern Universe (CF5) Dark Energy and Cosmic Acceleration: Cosmic Dawn and Before (CF6) Dark Energy and Cosmic Acceleration: Complementarity of Probes and New Facilities (CF7) Cosmic Probes of Fundamental Physics (Other) [Please specify frontier/topical group] Contact Information: Yun Wang (California Institute of Technology) [[email protected]] ATLAS Probe Collaboration Authors: Yun Wang (Caltech/IPAC), Lee Armus (Caltech/IPAC), Mario Ballardini (Western Cape), Robert Barkhouser (JHU), James Bartlett (JPL), Peter Behroozi (UA), Robert A. Benjamin (UWW), Jarle Brinch- mann (Porto/Leiden), Ranga-Ram Chary (Caltech/IPAC), Chia-Hsun Chuang (Stanford), Andrea Cimatti (Bologna), Charlie Conroy (Harvard), Robert Content (AAO-MQ), Emanuele Daddi (CEA), Mark Dick- inson (NOAO), Megan Donahue (MSU), Olivier Dore (JPL), Peter Eisenhardt (JPL), Andreas Faisst (Cal- tech/IPAC), Henry C. Ferguson (STScI), Wesley C. Fraser (NRC Canada), Karl Glazebrook (Swinburne), Anthony Gonzalez (UF), Varoujan Gorjian (JPL), George Helou (Caltech/IPAC), Lynne Hillenbrand (Cal- tech), Christopher M. Hirata (OSU), Michael Hudson (Waterloo), J. Davy Kirkpatrick (Caltech/IPAC), Jon Lawrence (AAO-MQ), Sangeeta Malhotra (GSFC), Simona Mei (Univ. of Paris), Lauro Moscardini (Bologna), Jeffrey A. Newman (Pittsburgh), Zoran Ninkov (RIT), Michael Ressler (JPL), James Rhoads (GSFC), Jason Rhodes (JPL), Massimo Robberto (STScI), Russell Ryan (STScI), Lado Samushia (Kansas State Univ.), Claudia Scarlata (Univ. of Minnesota), Daniel Scolnic (Duke Univ.), Michael Seiffert (JPL), Alice Shapley (UCLA), Stephen Smee (JHU), Francesco Valentino (Copenhagen), Dmitry Vorobiev (Univ.
    [Show full text]
  • Dark Energy Review
    Dark Energy Review Yun Wang Caltech/IPAC Cosmology Summer School Canary Islands, September 18, 2017 Outline • How do we know that dark energy exists? • What are the possible explanations for dark energy? • How do we probe the nature of dark energy using observational data? – Supernovae as dark energy probe – Galaxy clustering as dark energy probe – Weak lensing as dark energy probe • Future Prospects Yun Wang, September 2017 How do we know that dark energy exists? Yun Wang, September 2017 First Evidence for Dark Energy in the Hubble Diagrams of Supernovae [dL(z)] (Schmidt et al. 1998, Perlmutter et al. 1999) faint Yun Wang, September 2017 bright Alternative Analysis of First Evidence Flux-averaged and combined data of 92 SNe Ia from Schmidt et al. (1998) and Perlmutter et al. (1999). [Wang 2000b, ApJ ] Deceleration parameter q0 =Ωm/2-ΩΛ Data favor q0 <0: cosmic acceleration Yun Wang, September 2017 Yun Wang, September 2017 Figure by Yun Wang and Tim Pyle Yun Wang, September 2017 Evidence for cosmic acceleration has strengthened with time Hubble diagram of 740 SNe Ia compiled by Betoule et al. (2014) Hubble diagram of 472 SNe Ia [JLA set] compiled by Conley et al. (2011) 46 HST C 44 β − 1 42 X ↵ SNLS + 40 ) G ( SDSS 38 M − B ? 36 m Low-z = 34 µ 0.4 . CDM 0 2 ⇤ 0.0 µ . − 0 2 − µ 0.4 − 2 1 0 10− 10− 10 z Yun Wang, September 2017 Model-independent constraints on dark energy -24 1 yoctogram=10 g X(z)=ρX(z)/ρX(0) Wang, Chuang, & Mukherjee (2012) Wang & Dai, PRD (2016) Yun Wang, September 2017 What is the fate of the universe? Wang & Tegmark,
    [Show full text]
  • Biography of Yun Wang Poet and Cosmologist Yun Wang Grew up in Rural Southwest China
    Biography of Yun Wang Poet and cosmologist Yun Wang grew up in rural southwest China. She began writing poetry when she was 12, and majored in Physics at Tsinghua University when she was 16. She came to the U.S. for graduate school in Physics in 1985. She is the author of two poetry books (The Book of Totality, Salmon Poetry Press, 2015; and The Book of Jade, Winner of the 15th Nicholas Roerich Poetry Prize, Story Line Press, 2002), two poetry chapbooks (Horse by the Mountain Stream, Word Palace Press, 2016; The Carp, Bull Thistle Press, 1994), and a book of poetry translations (Dreaming of Fallen Blossoms: Tune Poems of Su Dong-Po, White Pine Press, 2019). Wang’s poems have been published in numerous literary journals, including The Kenyon Review, Cimarron Review, Salamander Magazine, Green Mountains Review, and International Quarterly. Her translations of classical Chinese poetry have been published in The Kenyon Review Online, Poetry Canada Review, Willow Springs, Connotation Press, and elsewhere. Wang is a Senior Research Scientist at California Institute of Technology. She is the author of the cosmology graduate textbook, Dark Energy (Wiley/VCH, 2010). Reviews of “Dreaming of Fallen Blossoms: Tune Poems of Su Dong-Po” (White Pine Press, 2019): • “The poems gathered here are tender and graceful in their attention to the natural world, poignant in their understanding of human lives, clear and yet mysterious in their allusiveness. This bilingual edition with valuable notes about each poem will be a treasure both to English speakers and to Chinese speakers.” ―Alicia Ostriker • “These translations from the poetry of the great Sung Dynasty master achieve the impossible: they are fine poems in English that are also accurate in the "carrying over" of the songs, language to language, culture from culture, that is, indeed, translation.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 International Conference of Physiological Sciences
    2016 International Conference of Physiological Sciences 25-28 September 2016 China National Convention Center Beijing, China Hosted by Chinese Association for Physiological Sciences Sponsored by International Union of Physiological Sciences (IUPS) The Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies (FAOPS) National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (NSFC) http://www.pco-online.com/icps2016/ Table of Contents ORGANIZATION .......................................................................................... 2 WELCOME MESSAGE .................................................................................... 3 CONFERENCE INFORMATION ........................................................................... 5 SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION ............................................................................. 6 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION ......................................................................... 12 RECOMMENDATION OF HOTEL ACCOMMODATION ................................................. 13 HOTEL INFORMATION ................................................................................. 14 GENERAL INFORMATION .............................................................................. 16 CONTACT ............................................................................................... 18 2 Organization Honorary Presidents Qide HAN, M.D. Vice Chairman of the Chinese People's Political and Consultative Conference (CPPCC), President of Peking University Health Science Center, China Denis NOBLE, Ph. D. President
    [Show full text]