DOCSLIB.ORG

Brazil Elections: Who Ever Wins, Debt Reigns

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Brazil Elections: Who Ever Wins, Debt Reigns For professional clients only October 2018 Research & Strategy Insights Brazil elections: Who ever wins, debt reigns Investors gear-up for potentially swift market reaction Irina Topa-Serry Senior Economist (Emerging markets) Research & Investment Strategy Governors and State Assembly members for 27 states. The Key points National Congress will reshuffle all of its 513 seats in the Chamber of Deputies and two-thirds of the Federal Senate • On 7 October and 28 October, Brazilians will elect the (54 out of 81 seats). The members will be inaugurated on 1 country’s next government i.e the President, the February 2019. Governors and most of the Congress members. These elections take place at a particularly difficult time, when This is an important election, not just because a lot of the economy has been weakened by the deepest political posts will be voted on, but because the future recession on record while corruption scandals have administration will have the responsibility to tackle Brazil’s significantly dented Brazilians’ trust in their politicians growing fiscal imbalances, and this will require politically • The next government will need to address Brazil’s challenging structural reforms. growing fiscal imbalances. Public debt has ballooned to 77% of GDP, and given persistent primary deficits, further contractions in the economy are expected. Structural Brazilian’s explosive public debt issue reforms, which require Congress support, are needed to Brazil’s external position is strong. The country is a net stabilise the debt trajectory in the medium term external creditor, thanks to a strong level of international • Visibility on the Presidential election outcome is low given reserves (US$367bn in August 2018). Public debt is a very fragmented race, with strong polarisation around predominantly BRL denominated (96% as of August 2018), political extremes non-resident ownership of local currency sovereign bonds is • Market reaction in the medium term will depend on both relatively low (12% at year-end 2017) and external roll-over the result and the new Government’s ability to pass much needs for both public and private debt are low, at around 8% needed reforms through Congress of GDP per year. Furthermore, over the last decade, Brazil’s large domestic economy was able to attract strong foreign direct investments, which provide a healthy financing of the Brazil elections: A needed wind of change… current account deficit. On 7 October, all Brazilians between the ages of 18 and 70 Brazil’s big issue is its fiscal accounts. The next administration are being called to the polls to elect their next President needs to put the country back on a sustainable fiscal path. (voting is a legal obligation in Brazil). After the first round a Public debt dynamics have been shifting drastically since likely necessary run-off will be held on 28 October. Alongside 2014 given its large and persistent primary deficits (Exhibit 1) the President and Vice President of the nation (who will both and its recession has exacerbated the structural problems of take office on 1 January 2019), Brazilians will also elect the 1 government finances. Gross public debt has actually jumped All spending items need to be contained. The pension reform from 51.5% in 2013 to 77% at present. comes at the forefront of the consolidation efforts, given the current large weight on public expenditures. Stabilising Exhibit 1: Persisitent primary fiscal deficits pension spending requires an increase in the retirement age, Brazil central government balance (bn BRL) unified rules for public and private sectors through a 200 reduction of the generous public employee system, as well as breaking the link between minimum pensions and wages. All 0 of these measures are difficult to push through Congress, as unsuccessful efforts by Mr Temer’s show. The next -200 administration will have to address the same issues as the debt clock ticks louder, raising the stakes for the upcoming -400 elections. Nominal balance Primary balance -600 A difficult race in a difficult context Jul-99 Jul-04 Jul-09 Jul-14 Jan-97 Jan-02 Jan-07 Jan-12 Jan-17 Oct-00 Oct-05 Oct-10 Oct-15 Apr-98 Apr-03 Apr-08 Apr-13 Apr-18 The 2018 elections are taking place in a particularly Source: DataStream and AXA IM R&IS calculations challenging environment. The economy is just coming out of its deepest recession on record where GDP fell by a Public debt will inevitably rise further despite federal cumulative 9.4% from its peak in the third quarter in 2013 to expenditure remaining constant in real terms as requested by its trough in during the first quarter of 2017. This has left the constitutional rule. Simulations to stabilise the debt profound scars on the economy, such as a high 12.3% trajectory by 2023 show the need for a cumulative fiscal unemployment rate (as of July 2018). This situation has effort of 4.5% of GDP (i.e. achieving a 2.5% of GDP primary particularly impacted the younger population – 29% of those surplus by 2026). Such adjustment implies a strong aged 15 to 24 year-olds are unemployed and it has also willingness and ability to push through structural reforms. helped drive an increase in the informal economy. (Exhibit 3) Exhibit 2: High share of mandatory spending Exhibit 3: A challenging economic backdrop Brazil budget expenditures, 2017 Brazil GDP growth and unemployment Other Disc.; 10% 16 Education; 10% 3% 14 Healthcare; 5% 12 Pensions; 8% 10 44% Other 0% 8 Compulsory; 6 14% -5% 4 GDP y/y % Unemployment rate (% RHS) 2 Payroll; 22% -10% 0 Source: Brazil Treasury Dept. and AXA IM R&IS calculations Compressing government’s spending will be politically painful. 1997 Q1 1998 Q2 1999 Q3 2000 Q4 2002 Q1 2003 Q2 2004 Q3 2005 Q4 2007 Q1 2008 Q2 2009 Q3 2010 Q4 2012 Q1 2013 Q2 2014 Q3 2015 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 Source: DataStream and AXA IM R&IS calculations Excluding interest payments, 90% of current budget expenditures are “mandatory”, namely: spending on On the political front, the country faced a multitude of pensions, civil servants’ salaries, healthcare and education, tumultuous events recently. There was the knife attack on and subsidies (Exhibit 2). These types of spending are presidential candidate Jair Bolsonaro in the midst of a particularly difficult to reduce and require structural reforms, campaign rally, ex-President Lula da Silva’s imprisonment, the which need Congress support ahead of implementation. The impeachment of President Dilma Rousseff in 2016 while current administration under President Michel Temer has numerous politicians and parties were implicated in the Lava tried to push through a number of measures. However most Jato (Car Wash) corruption scandal. Unsurprisingly, Brazilians’ of the structural reforms have been rejected or postponed by public trust in their own politicians ranks among worst in the Congress, such as pension reforms or delaying civil servants’ world (137 out of 138 in 2017) according to the Global wage deal, leaving the reduction of federal investments, Competitiveness Report, sourced by the World Economic which have already been compressed to minimal levels, as Forum. All this caused the election race to be fragmented, the only option. Brazil’s primary fiscal deficit reached 1.7% of with low visibility and a significant rise of political extremes. GDP in 2017, missing the official government target. 2 Exhibit 4: Frontrunners for President leading the polls, have very limited Congress support at present - each can claim 16% of the seats in the Lower Candidate Party Coalition Public positions House, and almost no support in the Senate. Present Sao Paulo State To Unite Brazilian Social Governor, ex Congressmen Brazil (PSDB Exhibit 5: Extreme polarisation Democratic and Vice-Governor of Sao Geraldo Alckmin DEM PP PR Party (PSDB) Paulo, lost 2006 Brazilian presidential election polls PRB SD PTB centre-right presidential % valid vote intentions PSD PPS) electionsagainst Lula 40 Brazil Above Everything, 30 Social Christian Jair Bolsonaro God Above Congressman since 1991 Party (PSC) right 20 Everyone (PSL PRTB) 10 Previously Minister of Finance, Mayor of 0 Democratic Sovereign Fortaleza, Governor of 20-Aug 27-Aug 3-Sep 10-Sep 17-Sep 24-Sep 1-Oct Ciro Gomes Labor Party Brazil (PDT Ceara, Congressman, Jair Bolsonaro (PSL) Fernando Haddad (PT) (PDT) left AVANTE) scored third in 1998 and Ciro Gomes (PDT) Geraldo Alckmin (PSDB) fourth in 2002 presidential Marina Silva (REDE) races Source: Ibope (first round) and AXA IM R&IS calculations People Previously Minister of Workers Party Happy Again Fernando Haddad Education, Mayor of Sao The willingness to implement reforms was expressed by most (PT) left (PT PROS Paulo candidates but there are significant differences in the plans PcdoB) Previously Minister of they have put forward. It seems more likely that Alckmin, Rede United to Environment, Senator, Bolsonaro and Marina Silva will seek to push through reforms Sustentabilidade Transform Marina Silva Congresswoman, scored (Rede) center- Brazil (REDE but Congress would need to shift dramatically in order for the third in 2010 and 2014 left PV) latter two to obtain solid support among members. The other presidential races Source: various public sources and AXA IM R&IS calculations two candidates, Ciro Gomes and Haddad would also require meaningful changes in the Congress structure if they were to Elections in Brazil, for Congressmen and for the President obtain a strong mandate – this would likely favour social alike, are a beauty contest in which people vote for a person, spending over structural reforms. not for a party. Yet, there is no room for independent candidates, as in order to run for office, one must belong to a political party. There are 35 political parties currently active in Beware of potentially hard market adjustments Brazil, 25 of which have representatives in the Lower House Painful reforms need to be implemented but polls suggest a of the Congress.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Brazil Ahead of the 2018 Elections
    BRIEFING Brazil ahead of the 2018 elections SUMMARY On 7 October 2018, about 147 million Brazilians will go to the polls to choose a new president, new governors and new members of the bicameral National Congress and state legislatures. If, as expected, none of the presidential candidates gains over 50 % of votes, a run-off between the two best-performing presidential candidates is scheduled to take place on 28 October 2018. Brazil's severe and protracted political, economic, social and public-security crisis has created a complex and polarised political climate that makes the election outcome highly unpredictable. Pollsters show that voters have lost faith in a discredited political elite and that only anti- establishment outsiders not embroiled in large-scale corruption scandals and entrenched clientelism would truly match voters' preferences. However, there is a huge gap between voters' strong demand for a radical political renewal based on new faces, and the dramatic shortage of political newcomers among the candidates. Voters' disillusionment with conventional politics and political institutions has fuelled nostalgic preferences and is likely to prompt part of the electorate to shift away from centrist candidates associated with policy continuity to candidates at the opposite sides of the party spectrum. Many less well-off voters would have welcomed a return to office of former left-wing President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (2003-2010), who due to a then booming economy, could run social programmes that lifted millions out of extreme poverty and who, barred by Brazil's judiciary from running in 2018, has tried to transfer his high popularity to his much less-known replacement.
    [Show full text]
  • Tucano Diário
    DIÁRIO TUCANOTUCANOTUCANO INFORMATIVO DAS BANCADAS DO PSDB NA CÂMARA E NO SENADO Nº614, Q U A R T A – F E I R A , 15 D E M A R Ç O DE 2006 SONORAS Geraldo Alckmin é o candidato do PSDB à Presidência O governador de São Paulo, Geraldo de desenvolvimento. Em seu pronunciamento, o “Vamos todos Alckmin (SP), será o candidato do PSDB à candidato elogiou os trabalhos de Tasso Jereissati arregaçar as Presidência da República. O anúncio oficial (CE) e Fernando Henrique, além de ter louvado ocorreu ontem na sede do Diretório Estadual do a postura de um “grande companheiro”, o prefeito mangas para PSDB/SP, com a presença das principais de São Paulo, José Serra, que abriu mão da eleger Geraldo lideranças tucanas, como o presidente do partido, candidatura em nome da união partidária. Alckmin senador Tasso Jereissati (CE), o ex-presidente ARREGAÇAR AS MANGAS – Ao declarar presidente Fernando Henrique Cardoso, os governadores que “o nosso candidato é Geraldo Alckmin”, o Aécio Neves (MG), Cássio Cunha Lima (PB), senador Tasso lembrou o espírito público de Serra do Brasil.” Simão Jatene (PA), Marconi Perillo (GO) e Lúcio e Alckmin e afirmou que a candidatura do Tasso Jereissati, presidente Alcântara (CE), além de parlamentares. Alckmin governador “dará ao país o que os brasileiros do PSDB disputará o cargo após passar cinco anos à frente merecem: homens dignos, sérios e competentes”. do Palácio dos Bandeirantes. “Vamos todos arregaçar as mangas”, assegurou. UNIÃO – Em seu discurso, Alckmin Já o governador de Minas Gerais, Aécio conclamou uma “união nacional” pela mudança.
    [Show full text]
  • Bancos E Banquetas. Jan2021
    !2 © Blog Cidadania & Cultura– 2021 Fernando Nogueira da Costa COSTA, Fernando Nogueira da Bancos e Banquetas: Evolução do Sistema Bancário Campinas, SP: Blog Cultura & Cidadania, 2021. 531p. 1. Perfis dos Velhos e Novos Banqueiros. 2. Inovações Tecnológicas e Financeiras. 3. Evolução Sistêmica. I. Título. 330 C837a ! !3 Sumário Prefácio ...................................................................................6 Introdução - Preâmbulo Histórico .................................................20 Anos 60: Regulamentação, Compartimentação, Especialização e Segmentação Bancária .......................................................................................21 Anos 70: Concentração, Conglomeração e Internacionalização ....................24 Anos 80: Ajuste das Empresas Não-Financeiras, Desajuste e Reajuste das Empresas Financeiras .......................................................................30 Anos 90: Principais Estratégias de Ajustamento à Liberalização Financeira ....37 Anos 2000: Reestruturação Patrimonial, Bancarização e Acesso Popular a Crédito .........................................................................................47 Capítulo 1 - Banqueiros e Políticos ...............................................57 Delfim Netto, Protagonista do Desenvolvimentismo de Direita ....................57 Fracionamento do Bloco de Poder da Ditadura Militar .........................................65 PMDB, Protagonista do Fisiologismo .....................................................69 Fernando Henrique Cardoso,
    [Show full text]
  • Brazil: Disputing Narratives in Unpredictable Elections
    : SPECIAL REPORT Brazil: Disputing Narratives in Unpredictable Elections São Paulo, September 2018 Barcelona • Bogota • Buenos Aires • Havana • Lima • Lisbon • Madrid • Mexico City • Miami • New York City • Panama City • Quito • Rio de Janeiro • Sao Paulo Santiago • Santo Domingo • Washington, DC BRAZIL: DISPUTING NARRATIVES IN UNPREDICTABLE ELECTIONS INTRODUCTION BRAZIL: DISPUTING NARRATIVES IN UNPREDICTABLE 1. THE LOVE/HATE ELECTIONS DICHOTOMY SURROUNDING LULAISMOPOSICIÓN AL A television host, a former minister of Brazil’s Supreme Federal Court, various GOBIERNO TEMER entrepreneurs with different ideologies…. 2. OPPOSITION TO THE TEMER ADMINISTRATIONCANDIDATOS PRINCIPALES There had been much speculation regarding the “outsider” candidates of Brazil’s traditional political arena who would make the upcoming presidential election the OTHER CANDIDATES most unpredictable since 1989. However, the final list of candidates triggered a “reality ELECTORAL CALENDAR check” moment; Brazilian voters were very much familiar with all those who have a AUTHORS chance of winning. In Brazil’s presidential elections, slated for October, voters have witnessed many discussions regarding legal uncertainties surrounding the candidacy of former President Lula, currently in jail and who has since announced he will not run and endorsed Haddad; political uncertainties arising from the controversial and conservative rightist candidacy of former military officer Jair Bolsonaro; and the lack of candidacy renewals of known politicians who have vied for the presidency in the past, among other topics. Five candidates are deemed top contenders, considering poll data accrued since early 2017 and the party structures supporting them during the campaign: • Jair Bolsonaro (Social Liberal Party), former military officer, currently in his seventh term as federal deputy for Rio de Janeiro.
    [Show full text]
  • Lula in the Labyrinth
    francisco de oliveira LULA IN THE LABYRINTH he re-election of Luiz Inácio da Silva in October 2006 allows us to decipher the ways in which Brazil’s political landscape has been reconstituted under the Workers Party government. The whirlwind of deregulation, privatization Tand restructuring under Fernando Henrique Cardoso in the 1990s— and with it, the dissolution of the industrial working class created during the developmentalist era—had torn up all established relations between economy and politics, classes and representation. The result was a period of indeterminacy, the context of Lula’s first presidential victory in 2002. Since then, a novel combination of neo-populism and party statification, shored up by social-liberal handouts, on the one hand, and government graft, on the other, has helped to forge a new form of class rule in Brazil that could be characterized as ‘hegemony in reverse’. In what follows I will trace the ways in which the outcomes of the ‘era of indeterminacy’ were overdetermined by intensive exposure to the relations of global capital. But first, a brief comment on the 2006 elec- tion itself. Although voting is compulsory in Brazil, 23 per cent of the electorate stayed away from the ballot box altogether, while another 8 per cent cast either null or blank votes. This means that 31 per cent of voters were either not interested, or could not bring themselves to vote for any candidate. It is the highest measure of electoral indifference in modern Brazilian history. The reality of this disengagement was all too apparent in the street: there was no excitement, not a single pt banner or that of any other party, no mobilization whatsoever.
    [Show full text]
  • Clipping Deputados 20/07/2018
    CLIPPING DEPUTADOS 20/07/2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Marcelo Lula AS DÚVIDAS SOBRE A CONVENÇÃO DO PSD, AMIN CONFIRMA PARTICIPAÇÃO ENTRE OUTROS DESTAQUES O plenário da Assembleia Legislativa será palco amanhã, do que está sendo chamada de “Super Convenção”. A partir das 09h, PSB, PDT, PSC, PRB, PROS, Solidariedade, Podemos, PRP, PHS e PCdoB, realizam as suas convenções a partir das 09h. Após, as lideranças desses partidos vão ao parlamento para participar da convenção do PSD, que terá início as 10h, quando através de seus delegados confirmarão a indicação do nome de Gelson Merisio como candidato a governador e, de Raimundo Colombo ao Senado. 16 A organização pessedista não adianta os detalhes, mas promete um grandioso evento, a exemplo do lançamento da pré-candidatura de Merisio em Chapecó, quando 10 mil pessoas entre filiados ao partido e simpatizantes participaram. Independentemente do tamanho do evento, ainda pairam algumas dúvidas do que acontecerá amanhã. Ontem o pré-candidato do Progressistas, deputado Esperidião Amin, ligou para Merisio, comunicando que irá participar da convenção. “Eu avisei que vou praticar um ato de carinho com ele, que deixará a mulher dele enciumada”, me disse Amin. Agora, será que Merisio faria um evento de grande magnitude como está sendo prometido, para não se anunciar candidato? E quanto ao Progressistas de Amin, será que o partido iria a um evento de um futuro adversário? São algumas das perguntas que tiram o sono de quem deseja montar o verdadeiro quebra-cabeça eleitoral de nosso estado. Ainda hoje, novas conversas devem acontecer e, quem sabe, o Progressistas responda ao que pode ter sido a última proposta de Merisio, que é de entregar duas vagas na majoritária, sendo uma ao Senado e a outra a vice-governador.
    [Show full text]
  • Qformer Brazilian President
    LATIN AMERICA ADVISOR A DAILY PUBLICATION OF THE DIALOGUE www.thedialogue.org Monday, April 16, 2018 BOARD OF ADVISORS FEATURED Q&A TODAY’S NEWS Diego Arria Director, Columbus Group POLITICAL Devry Boughner Vorwerk Corporate VP, Global Corporate Affairs Has Brazil’s Oil Tensions Over Cargill Joyce Chang Venezuela Flare Global Head of Research, Sector Gotten at Lima Summit JPMorgan Chase & Co. Dirk Donath The eighth Summit of the Amer- Senior Partner, icas wrapped up this weekend Catterton Aimara Back on Track? with strong statements critical Marlene Fernández of Venezuela’s President, Nicolás Corporate Vice President for Maduro, from the United States Government Relations, Arcos Dorados and its allies that were met with rebukes from Cuba and Bolivia. Peter Hakim President Emeritus, Page 2 Inter-American Dialogue Donna Hrinak ECONOMIC President, Boeing Latin America Jon Huenemann Argentina, U.S. Vice President, U.S. & Int’l Affairs, Philip Morris International Reach Deal on James R. Jones Pork Imports Chairman, Monarch Global Strategies The deal will allow U.S. pork to be Craig A. Kelly imported into Argentina for the Director, Americas International Last month Petrobras, led by CEO Pedro Parente (R) posted a $136 million loss for 2017, its fi rst time since 1992. Agriculture Gov’t Relations, Exxon Mobil smallest annual decline in the last four years. // File Photo: Government of Brazil. offi cials in Argentina had cited John Maisto health concerns over trichinosis, Director, U.S. Education Saddled with at least $85 billion in debt, Brazilian state a parasitic disease caused by Finance Group oil company Petrobras faces a diffi cult path ahead, Fitch roundworms, in keeping the ban.
    [Show full text]
  • BRAZIL: Bolsonaro-Haddad Prevail, and New Election Starts
    Latin America | October 8, 2018 BRAZIL: Bolsonaro-Haddad prevail, and new election starts As forecast in publications from 4, 5, and 7 October, there ● First-round victors traditionally win the run-off elections in will be a second round pitting the far-rightist Jair Bolsonaro Brazil. Lula, for example, reached 48.61% in the first round from the Social Liberal Party (PSL) and the leftist Fernando against Geraldo Alckmin in 2006 and won the run-off vote Haddad from the Workers’ Party (PT). Bolsonaro came close with 60.8%. to reaching the 50% threshold for a first-round victory with 46% ● Given the high level of polarization between the two of the valid votes while Haddad reached 29%. The third place candidates, votes cast in the first round should remain with candidate was center-leftist Ciro Gomes from the Democratic the same candidate in the second – which is another way Labor Party (PDT) with 12.51% of the valid votes. Reformist of saying that Bolsonaro may be only 4 percentage points candidate from the Brazilian Social Democracy Party (PSDB), away from victory unless he botches his campaign in a Geraldo Alckmin, obtained 4.78% while all others were below significant manner. 3% of the total valid votes. Despite the deep divisions in society and an evident polarization expressed in the final first- ● For Haddad, the opportunity for Bolsonaro to trip up will round tally, election day was marked by serenity. present itself in the higher exposure that the retired army captain will have to face, especially in debates. In the second round, all campaigning rights between the two ● contenders are equal and independent from the number of Bolsonaro has relied heavily on his main economic advisor, minister-to-be, Paulo Guedes, an ultra-liberal economist existing party candidates in the House of Representatives, who believes in the widespread privatization of state- including official TV and radio time.
    [Show full text]
  • Participatory Democracy in Brazil: Foundations, Developments, and Limits
    Participatory Democracy in Brazil: Foundations, Developments, and Limits by José Ricardo Tranjan A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Global Governance Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2012 © José Ricardo Tranjan 2012 I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract A lack of historical perspective sustained the widespread view that participatory initiatives in Brazil represented a marked rupture from traditional forms of political engagement to radically new democratic practices. This view overlooks both incremental steps towards broader political participation taking place throughout the 20th century and setbacks restricting participation in the 1980s. This dissertation offers a historical account of the emergence of participatory democracy in Brazil that challenges this dominant view and calls attention to the importance of structural factors and national-level political-institutional contexts. Three case studies of municipal administrations in the late-1970s and early-1980s shine light on the impact of structural factors in the emergence, design, and outcome of participatory initiatives, and the contrast of these precursory experiences with the internationally known 1990s participatory models shows how participatory ideals and practices responded to the changing institutional context of the 1980s. This dissertation puts forward three central arguments. First, research should not treat citizen participation as a normative imperative but instead examine how it emerges through social and political struggles fueled by structural inequalities.
    [Show full text]
  • Talking It Out: Political Conversation and Knowledge Gaps in Unequal Urban Contexts
    B.J.Pol.S. 48, 407–425 Copyright © Cambridge University Press, 2016 doi:10.1017/S0007123415000721 First published online 22 June 2016 Talking It Out: Political Conversation and Knowledge Gaps in Unequal Urban Contexts AMY ERICA SMITH* In many contemporary urban spaces, political information accrues to high status neighborhoods. This might exacerbate political inequality as the information-rich and information-poor each talk primarily with others like themselves. When information is specific and broadly diffused through the media, however, the con- venience and low cognitive costs of everyday conversation could be especially helpful for the disadvantaged. This article shows how political conversations intensify or ameliorate spatial knowledge gaps, using a six-wave panel survey in fifty Brazilian neighborhoods between 2002 and 2006. Multilevel models demon- strate that conversation was more frequent in high education neighborhoods, but had a greater impact on specific, factual knowledge in low-education neighborhoods, leading to shrinking knowledge gaps. However, conversation slightly widened spatial gaps in socially perceived general knowledge. Though scholarly disagreements abound over how much citizens need to know about politics to make representative democracy work, an unspoken premise is shared: citizens need to know something; it is hard to imagine meaningful elections in which citizens vote entirely arbitrarily. Whether, how, and under what circumstances citizens acquire political information are, therefore, core questions facing observers of contemporary democracies. One immediate answer has been that citizens learn what they need to know by talking with each other. From stable two party elections in the United States of the 1940s, to foundational elections in Africa in the 2000s, opinion leaders have been shown to transmit knowledge, norms, and vote preferences to the people they encounter in the course of their daily lives.1 This emphasis on interpersonal learning is both intuitively and normatively appealing.
    [Show full text]
  • Impeachment, Political Crisis and Democracy in Brazil; Impeachment
    REVISTA DE CIENCIA POLÍTICA / VOLUMEN 37 / N° 2 / 2017 / 281-304 IMPEACHMENT, POLITICAL CRISIS AND DEMOCRACY IN BRAZIL Impeachment, crisis política y democracia en Brasil FELIPE NUNES Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brasil CARLOS RANULFO MELO Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brasil ABSTRACT The year 2016 was marked by the deepening of the crisis that interrupted two de- cades of unusual political stability in Brazil. Although it has been the most signifi- cant event, Dilma Rousseff’s impeachment did little to “stop the bleeding,” as was shown by the subsequent arrest of the former president of the Chamber of Depu- ties, Eduardo Cunha (PMDB), and the unfolding of Operation Car Wash (Lava Jato). Besides the economic problems, the Brazilian political system also faced a serious crisis of legitimacy: the main parties were put in check, and a period of uncertainty regarding electoral and partisan competition opened up. In this article, we will re- view the sequence of the events, exploring some of the factors that explain it, and, aware of the fact that we are in the middle of process with an undefined outcome, we would like to take advantage of the opportunity to resume the debate on the performance of Brazilian democracy as well its perspectives. Key words: democracy, presidentialism, political crisis, presidential interruption, Brazil RESUMEN El año 2016 estuvo marcado por la profundización de una crisis que interrumpió dos déca- das de inusual estabilidad política en Brasil. A pesar de ser el acontecimiento político más significativo del año, el enjuiciamiento de Dilma Rousseff hizo poco para detener el “sangra- do,” como lo demostró la posterior detención del ex presidente de la Cámara de Diputados, Eduardo Cunha (PMDB), y el despliegue de la Operación Coche Lavado (LavaJato).
    [Show full text]
  • DESARROLLISMO, NEODESARROLLISMO Y PROGRESISMO EN BRASIL: Un Análisis Histórico-Estructural De Los Pactos Político-Económicos
    DIVISIÓN DE CIENCIAS SOCIALES Y HUMANIDADES TESIS DESARROLLISMO, NEODESARROLLISMO Y PROGRESISMO EN BRASIL: un análisis histórico-estructural de los pactos político-económicos para obtener el grado de DOCTORA EN CIENCIAS SOCIALES Y HUMANIDADES presenta Ivone Cristina de Sá Cavalcante Director Dr. Felipe Victoriano (DCCD UAM-Cuajimalpa) Sínodo Dra. Beatriz Stolowicz Weinberger (Depto. Política y Cultura, UAM-Xochimilco) Dra. Esperanza Isabel Palma Cabrera (Depto. Sociología, UAM-Azcapotzalco) Dra. Monika Ribeiro de Freitas Meireles (Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas-IIEc, UNAM) Ciudad de México, febrero de 2021 A los imprescindibles, aquellos que lucharon y luchan toda la vida. A mis padres, mi inspiración mayor. Índice de Contenido Resumen .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Abstract ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Agradecimientos ..................................................................................................................................... 8 Prefacio.................................................................................................................................................. 11 Introducción .......................................................................................................................................... 14 Marco teórico-metodológico .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]