DOCSLIB.ORG

Economic Perspectives

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Economic Perspectives The Journal of The Journal of Economic Perspectives Economic Perspectives The Journal of Spring 2015, Volume 29, Number 2 Economic Perspectives Symposia The Bailouts of 2007–2009 Austan D. Goolsbee and Alan B. Krueger, “A Retrospective Look at Rescuing and Restructuring General Motors and Chrysler” W. Scott Frame, Andreas Fuster, Joseph Tracy, and James Vickery, “The Rescue of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac” Charles W. Calomiris and Urooj Khan, “An Assessment of TARP Assistance to Financial Institutions” Robert McDonald and Anna Paulson, “AIG in Hindsight” Phillip Swagel, “Legal, Political, and Institutional Constraints on A journal of the the Financial Crisis Policy Response” American Economic Association Disability Insurance Jeffrey B. Liebman, “Understanding the Increase in Disability Insurance Benet 29, Number 2 Spring 2015 Volume Receipt in the United States” Pierre Koning and Maarten Lindeboom, “The Rise and Fall of Disability Insurance Enrollment in the Netherlands” James Banks, Richard Blundell, and Carl Emmerson, “Disability Benet Receipt and Reform: Reconciling Trends in the United Kingdom” Articles Darrell Dufe and Jeremy C. Stein, “Reforming LIBOR and Other Financial Market Benchmarks” Rainer Böhme, Nicolas Christin, Benjamin Edelman, and Tyler Moore, “Bitcoin: Economics, Technology, and Governance” Konstantin Kashin, Gary King, and Samir Soneji, “Systematic Bias and Nontransparency in US Social Security Administration Forecasts” Recommendations for Further Reading Spring 2015 The Journal of Economic Perspectives A journal of the American Economic Association Editor Enrico Moretti, University of California at Berkeley Co-editors Gordon Hanson, University of California at San Diego Ulrike Malmendier, University of California at Berkeley Associate Editors Anat Admati, Stanford University Amy Finkelstein, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Adam Looney, US Department of the Treasury Emi Nakamura, Columbia University Richard Newell, Duke University Scott Stern, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Christopher Udry, Yale University Managing Editor Timothy Taylor Assistant Editor Ann Norman Editorial offices: Journal of Economic Perspectives American Economic Association Publications 2403 Sidney St., #260 Pittsburgh, PA 15203 email: [email protected] The Journal of Economic Perspectives gratefully acknowledges the support of Macalester College. Registered in the US Patent and Trademark Office (®). Copyright © 2015 by the American Economic Association; All Rights Reserved. Composed by American Economic Association Publications, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. Printed by R. R. Donnelley Company, Jefferson City, Missouri, 65109, USA. No responsibility for the views expressed by the authors in this journal is assumed by the editors or by the American Economic Association. THE JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES (ISSN 0895-3309), Spring 2015, Vol. 29, No. 2. The JEP is published quarterly (February, May, August, November) by the American Economic Association, 2014 Broadway, Suite 305, Nashville, TN 37203-2418. Annual dues for regular membership are $20.00, $30.00, or $40.00 depending on income; for an additional $15.00, you can receive this journal in print. E-reader versions are free. For details and further information on the AEA go to https://www.aeaweb.org/. Periodicals postage paid at Nashville, TN, and at additional mailing offices. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to the Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2014 Broadway, Suite 305, Nashville, TN 37203. Printed in the U.S.A. The Journal of Economic Perspectives Contents Volume 29 • Number 2 • Spring 2015 Symposia The Bailouts of 2007–2009 Austan D. Goolsbee and Alan B. Krueger, “A Retrospective Look at Rescuing and Restructuring General Motors and Chrysler” ..................3 W. Scott Frame, Andreas Fuster, Joseph Tracy, and James Vickery, “The Rescue of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac” ..............................25 Charles W. Calomiris and Urooj Khan, “An Assessment of TARP Assistance to Financial Institutions” ........................................ 53 Robert McDonald and Anna Paulson, “AIG in Hindsight” .................. 81 Phillip Swagel, “Legal, Political, and Institutional Constraints on the Financial Crisis Policy Response” ...................................... 107 Disability Insurance Jeffrey B. Liebman, “Understanding the Increase in Disability Insurance Benefit Receipt in the United States” .......................... 123 Pierre Koning and Maarten Lindeboom, “The Rise and Fall of Disability Insurance Enrollment in the Netherlands” ...................... 151 James Banks, Richard Blundell, and Carl Emmerson, “Disability Benefit Receipt and Reform: Reconciling Trends in the United Kingdom” . 173 Articles Darrell Duffie and Jeremy C. Stein, “Reforming LIBOR and Other Financial Market Benchmarks” ........................................ 191 Rainer Böhme, Nicolas Christin, Benjamin Edelman, and Tyler Moore, “Bitcoin: Economics, Technology, and Governance” .............. 213 Konstantin Kashin, Gary King, and Samir Soneji, “Systematic Bias and Nontransparency in US Social Security Administration Forecasts” ..239 Features Timothy Taylor, “Recommendations for Further Reading” .................259 Statement of Purpose The Journal of Economic Perspectives attempts to fill a gap between the general interest press and most other academic economics journals. The journal aims to publish articles that will serve several goals: to synthesize and integrate lessons learned from active lines of economic research; to provide economic analysis of public policy issues; to encourage cross-fertilization of ideas among the fields of economics; to offer readers an accessible source for state-of-the-art economic thinking; to suggest directions for future research; to provide insights and read- ings for classroom use; and to address issues relating to the economics profession. Articles appearing in the journal are normally solicited by the editors and associate editors. Proposals for topics and authors should be directed to the journal office, at the address inside the front cover. Policy on Data Availability It is the policy of the Journal of Economic Perspectives to publish papers only if the data used in the analysis are clearly and precisely documented and are readily available to any researcher for purposes of replication. Details of the computations sufficient to permit replication must be provided. The Editor should be notified at the time of submission if the data used in a paper are proprietary or if, for some other reason, the above requirements cannot be met. Policy on Disclosure Authors of articles appearing in the Journal of Economic Perspectives are expected to disclose any potential conflicts of interest that may arise from their consulting activities, financial interests, or other nonacademic activities. Journal of Economic Perspectives Advisory Board Janet Currie, Princeton University Franceso Giavazzi, Bocconi University Claudia Goldin, Harvard University Robert E. Hall, Stanford University Greg Ip, Wall Street Journal Hongbin Li, Tsinghua University John Roemer, Yale University Paul Romer, New York University Howard Rosenthal, New York University Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 29, Number 2—Spring 2015—Pages 3–24 A Retrospective Look at Rescuing and Restructuring General Motors and Chrysler† Austan D. Goolsbee and Alan B. Krueger he rescue of the US automobile industry amid the 2008–2009 recession and financial crisis was a consequential, controversial, and difficult decision T made at a fraught moment for the US economy. Both of us were involved in the decision process at the time, but since have moved back to academia. More than five years have passed since the bailout began, and it is timely to look back at this unusual episode of economic policymaking to consider what we got right, what we got wrong, and why. We are pleased and a bit surprised by how well the last five years have played out for the domestic auto industry. At a critical point in the internal debate over the auto industry bailouts in March 2009, Larry Summers, at that time director of the National Economic Council, assembled members of the Obama administra- tion’s economic and autos team around his cramped table in the West Wing of the White House. He held a straw vote on whether the advisors believed Chrysler would survive for five years if a government-supported merger with Fiat went through. A narrow majority, including us, voted no. Five years on, both General Motors and Chrysler have survived, rebounded, and, by many metrics, appear healthy. ■ Austan D. Goolsbee is Robert P. Gwinn Professor of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. He was a member of the Council of Economic Advisers from March 2009 to September 2010, and Chairman of the Council from September 2010 to August 2011. Alan B. Krueger is Bendheim Professor of Economics and Public Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey. He was Assistant Secretary for Economic Policy and Chief Economist at the US Treasury Department from 2009 to 2010, and Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers from November 2011 to August 2013. Their email addresses are goolsbee@chicago booth.edu and [email protected]. † To access the Data Appendix and disclosure statements, visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.2.3 doi=10.1257/jep.29.2.3 4 Journal of Economic Perspectives Economic analysis contributed throughout the process of deciding how to respond to the auto companies’ requests for extraordinary support, and President
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Global Delivery and Takeaway Food Market
    +44 20 8123 2220 [email protected] Global Delivery and Takeaway Food Market Report 2021 https://marketpublishers.com/r/GD9E8CD81AE5EN.html Date: March 2021 Pages: 122 Price: US$ 2,350.00 (Single User License) ID: GD9E8CD81AE5EN Abstracts At the beginning of 2020, COVID-19 disease began to spread around the world, millions of people worldwide were infected with COVID-19 disease, and major countries around the world have implemented foot prohibitions and work stoppage orders. Except for the medical supplies and life support products industries, most industries have been greatly impacted, and Delivery and Takeaway Food industries have also been greatly affected. In the past few years, the Delivery and Takeaway Food market experienced a growth of XXX, the global market size of Delivery and Takeaway Food reached XXX million $ in 2020, of what is about XXX million $ in 2015. From 2015 to 2019, the growth rate of global Delivery and Takeaway Food market size was in the range of xxx%. At the end of 2019, COVID-19 began to erupt in China, Due to the huge decrease of global economy; we forecast the growth rate of global economy will show a decrease of about 4%, due to this reason, Delivery and Takeaway Food market size in 2020 will be XXX with a growth rate of xxx%. This is xxx percentage points lower than in previous years. As of the date of the report, there have been more than 20 million confirmed cases of CVOID-19 worldwide, and the epidemic has not been effectively controlled. Therefore, we predict that the global epidemic will be basically controlled by the end of 2020 and the global Delivery and Takeaway Food market size will reach XXX million $ in 2025, with a CAGR of xxx% between 2020-2025.
    [Show full text]
  • AIG Financial Products Corp
    AIG Financial Products Corp. 50 Danbury Road, Wilton, CT 06897-4444 For Immediate Release AIG FINANCIAL PRODUCTS AND GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS AGREE ON THE ACQUISITION OF LONDON CITY AIRPORT LONDON – 11 October, 2006 -- AIG Financial Products Corp. (AIG-FP), a wholly- owned subsidiary of American International Group, Inc., and Global Infrastructure Partners (GIP), the infrastructure joint venture between Credit Suisse and GE Infrastructure, announced today that they have signed a definitive agreement to acquire 100% of the share capital of the company that owns and operates the business known as London City Airport (the “Airport") from Airport Management and Investment Limited. Pursuant to the terms of the deal, AIG-FP and GIP will each own 50% of the equity interest of the company that owns the Airport. The Airport is located in the Royal Docks, in the London Borough of Newham in East London. The Airport is unique in that it predominantly serves business travelers to and from London, given its convenient location. The Airport is less than three miles from Canary Wharf, six miles from the City of London, and 10 miles from the West End. It offers easy access to 27 destinations within the United Kingdom and across Europe. The Airport also ranks as the third largest corporate aviation facility in the United Kingdom. The transaction remains subject to EU merger clearance and currently is expected to close in November 2006. “I am extremely pleased that AIG Financial Products and Global Infrastructure Partners have been successful in their bid for London City Airport,” said Joseph Cassano, President of AIG-FP.
    [Show full text]
  • ©International Monetary Fund. Not for Redistribution 40
    39 These insights are relevant to today’s crisis. If the health crisis is mismanaged, it could linger for years and lead to a more persistent crisis. If our economic policies are not aggressive enough, they could make the economic effects of the crisis even larger. Continued macroeconomic stimulus, where policy space exists, is needed using an array of policy instruments. While these are standard recipes for any crisis, our research highlights that, in the presence of hysteresis and in the case of a large and persistent event like the one we are witnessing, the costs of policy mistakes are very large. Now is not the time to doubt or err on the side of caution when it comes to expansionary economic policies. ©International Monetary Fund. Not for Redistribution 40 References Aghion, Philippe, Philippe Askenazy, Nicolas Berman, Gilbert Cette, and Laurent Eymard, 2012, “Credit Constraints and the Cyclicality of R&D Investment: Evidence from France.” Journal of the European Economic Association 10(5):1001–1024. Aghion, Philippe, and Peter Howitt, 1992, “A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction.” Econometrica 60(2):323–351. Aghion, Philippe, and Gilles Saint-Paul, 1991, “On the Virtue of Bad times: An Analysis of the Interaction between Economic Fluctuations and Productivity Growth.” CEPR Discussion Papers 578. Centre for Economic Policy Research, London. Anzoategui, Diego, Diego Comin, Mark Gertler, and Joseba Martinez, 2019, “Endogenous Technology Adoption and R&D as Sources of Business Cycle Persistence.” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 11(3):67–110. Arrow, Kenneth J., 1962, “The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing.” The Review of Economic Studies 29(3):155–173.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Macroeconomics Sequence (2021-2022)
    European University Institute Department of Economics This version: July 19, 2021 Outline of Macroeconomics Sequence (2021-2022) Core courses (Year 1, compulsory) Core 1: Dynamic Fiscal and Monetary Policy (Russell Cooper, [email protected]) Core 2A: Dynamic Programming and Real Business Cycles (Jesus Bueren, [email protected]) Core 2B: New Keynesian Economics (Edouard Challe, [email protected]) Core 3A: Search Theory (Edouard Challe, [email protected]) Core 3B: Incomplete Markets (Alexander Monge-Naranjo, [email protected]) Advanced courses (Year 2+, elective) Advanced 1: Firm Dynamics [half-credit] (Basile Grassi, [email protected]) Advanced 2: Quantitative Methods and Applications: Dynamic Factor Demand [half-credit] (Russell Cooper, [email protected]) Advanced 3: Fiscal and Monetary Policy and Institutions in a Century of Crises [full-credit] (Ramon Marimon, [email protected]) Advanced 4: Asset Pricing and Bubbles [half-credit] (Edouard Challe, [email protected]) Advanced 5: Life-Cycle Heterogeneous Agents Models: Solution and Estimation [full-credit] (Jesus Bueren, [email protected]) Advanced 6: Computations and Quantitative Models in Macro [half-credit] (Alexander Monge-Naranjo, [email protected]) Advanced 7: Topics on Housing and the Macroeconomy [half-credit] (Antonia Díaz, [email protected]) Advanced 8: Macro Models with Exogenous and Endogenous Incomplete Markets [half-credit] TBC (Árpád Ábrahám, [email protected]) Advanced 9: Inequality and Education [full-credit] (Alexander Monge-Naranjo, [email protected]) Advanced 10: Topics in Banking and Finance [half-credit] (Thorsten Beck, [email protected]) Advanced 11: Optimal Fiscal Policy in (Quantitative) Macro Models [half-credit] (Axelle Ferriere, [email protected]) .../..
    [Show full text]
  • Politics and Economics in Weak and Strong States
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES POLITICS AND ECONOMICS IN WEAK AND STRONG STATES Daron Acemoglu Working Paper 11275 http://www.nber.org/papers/w11275 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 April 2005 I thank Simon Johnson, Robert King, Philipp Harms, Gerard Padro-i-Miguel, James Robinson, Pierre-Daniel Sarte, Pierre Yared, an anonymous referee, and participants in the Brown University microeconomics seminar, Canadian Institute of Advanced Research conference, Macroeconomics and Political Economy conference in Gerzenzee, and MIT macro lunch for helpful comments and Ufuk Akcigit, Pierre Yared and especially Alexandre Debs for excellent research assistance. I thank the National Science Foundation Grant SES 0443465 for financial support. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. ©2005 by Daron Acemoglu. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Politics and Economics in Weak and Strong States Daron Acemoglu NBER Working Paper No. 11275 April 2005 JEL No. P16, H10 ABSTRACT While much research in political economy points out the benefits of "limited government," political scientists have long emphasized the problems created in many less developed nations by "weak states," which lack the power to tax and regulate the economy and to withstand the political and social challenges from non-state actors. I construct a model in which the state apparatus is controlled by a self-interested ruler, who tries to divert resources for his own consumption, but who can also invest in socially productive public goods.
    [Show full text]
  • Macroeconomics 4
    Macroeconomics IV Bocconi University Ph.D. in Economics Spring 2021 Instructor: Luigi Iovino Time: Th. 16:30 – 18:00 Email: [email protected] F.10:20 – 11:50 TA: Andrea Pasqualini Email: [email protected] Course description. This course is divided into three parts. In the first part, we will cover the workhorse New-Keynesian model. We will use this model to draw normative lessons for monetary policy, both with and without commitment of the Central Bank. We will also discuss the empirical evidence quantifying the importance of nominal rigidities. The second part of the course focuses on the effect of financial frictions on macroeconomic outcomes. Loosely speaking, financial frictions refer to the informational, behavioral, or insti- tutional features that constrain the flow of resources from savers to potential investors or con- sumers. This course introduces some of these frictions and analyzes their effect on investment, consumption, asset prices, financial crises, and business cycles. In the third part, we will study models with informational frictions. Starting from the seminal work of Lucas (1972) on money non-neutrality, the course will cover the business-cycle proper- ties of models with dispersed information and the social value of information. We will discuss (most of) the papers marked with an asterisk. The other papers are recom- mended to those who are interested in the topic. 1 The New Keynesian Model Theory * Jordi Gal´ı. Monetary policy, inflation, and the business cycle: an introduction to the new Keynesian framework and its applications. Princeton University Press, 2015 • Carl E Walsh. Monetary theory and policy.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Design of Hierarchies: Coordination Versus Specialization
    NBER WORKING PAPER SEIUES ON THE DESIGN OF HIERARCHIES: COORDINATION VERSUS SPECIALIZATION Oliver Hart John Moore Working Paper 7388 http://www.nber.org/papers/w73 88 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 October 1999 We thank Philippe Aghion, Antoine Faure-Grimaud, Ulrike Malmendier, Fausto Panunzi, Rohan Pitchford, Andrei Shleifer, Jean Tirole, Chenggang Xu, and seminar audiences at the Western Economic Association and European Association for Research in Industrial Economics (EARlE) meetings for helpful comments.We acknowledge financial support from the U.S. National Science Foundation through the National Bureau of Economic Research, the Leverhulme Trust, the LSE Financial Markets Group, and the Suntory Toyota International Centre for Economics and Related Disciplines at the LSE. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Bureau of Economic Research. )1999by Oliver Hart and John Moore. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice,is given to the source. On the Design of Hierarchies: Coordination Versus Specialization Oliver Hart and John Moore NBER Working Paper No. 7388 October 1999 JELNo.D2, L2 ABSTRACT We develop a model of hierarchies based on the allocation of authority. A firm's owners have ultimate authority over a firm's decisions, but they have limited time or capacity to exercise this authority. Hence owners must delegate authority to subordinates. However, these subordinates also have limited time or capacity and so further delegation must occur. We analyze the optimal chain of command given that different agents have different tasks: some agents are engaged in coordination and others in specialization.
    [Show full text]
  • American International Group, Inc. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 ________________ FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2015 Commission File Number 1-8787 American International Group, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 13-2592361 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 175 Water Street, New York, New York 10038 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (212) 770-7000 ________________ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Food and Beverage Sales Are Poised to Accelerate — Is the Packaging Ecosystem Ready?
    Executive Insights Volume XXI, Issue 4 Online Food and Beverage Sales Are Poised to Accelerate — Is the Packaging Ecosystem Ready? The future looks bright for all things ecommerce primary and secondary ecommerce food and beverage packaging. in the food and beverage sector, fueled by What do the key players need to consider as they position themselves to win in this brave new world? Amazon’s purchase of Whole Foods, a growing Can the digital shelf compete with the real thing? millennial consumer base and increased Historically, low food and beverage ecommerce penetration consumer adoption rates driven by retailers’ rates have been fueled by both a dearth of affordable, quality push to improve the user experience. But this ecommerce options and consumer inertia. First, brick-and-mortar optimism isn’t confined to grocery retailers, meal grocery retailers typically see low-single-digit profit margins due to the high cost of managing perishable products and cold-chain kit companies and food-delivery outfits. distribution. No exception to that rule, ecommerce retail grocers struggle with the same challenges of balancing overhead with Internet sales are forecast to account for 15%-20% of the food affordable retail prices. and beverage sector’s overall sales by 2025 — a potential tenfold increase over 2016 — which foreshadows big opportunities for Consumers have also driven lagging sales, lacking enthusiasm for food and beverage packaging converters that can anticipate the a model that has seen challenges in providing quick fulfillment evolving needs of brand owners and consumers (see Figure 1). and delivery service — especially for unplanned or impulse And the payoff could be just as lucrative for food and beverage buys.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Perspectives
    The Journal of The Journal of Economic Perspectives Economic Perspectives The Journal of Spring 2015, Volume 29, Number 2 Economic Perspectives Symposia The Bailouts of 2007–2009 Austan D. Goolsbee and Alan B. Krueger, “A Retrospective Look at Rescuing and Restructuring General Motors and Chrysler” W. Scott Frame, Andreas Fuster, Joseph Tracy, and James Vickery, “The Rescue of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac” Charles W. Calomiris and Urooj Khan, “An Assessment of TARP Assistance to Financial Institutions” Robert McDonald and Anna Paulson, “AIG in Hindsight” Phillip Swagel, “Legal, Political, and Institutional Constraints on A journal of the the Financial Crisis Policy Response” American Economic Association Disability Insurance Jeffrey B. Liebman, “Understanding the Increase in Disability Insurance Benet 29, Number 2 Spring 2015 Volume Receipt in the United States” Pierre Koning and Maarten Lindeboom, “The Rise and Fall of Disability Insurance Enrollment in the Netherlands” James Banks, Richard Blundell, and Carl Emmerson, “Disability Benet Receipt and Reform: Reconciling Trends in the United Kingdom” Articles Darrell Dufe and Jeremy C. Stein, “Reforming LIBOR and Other Financial Market Benchmarks” Rainer Böhme, Nicolas Christin, Benjamin Edelman, and Tyler Moore, “Bitcoin: Economics, Technology, and Governance” Konstantin Kashin, Gary King, and Samir Soneji, “Systematic Bias and Nontransparency in US Social Security Administration Forecasts” Recommendations for Further Reading Spring 2015 The Journal of Economic Perspectives A journal of
    [Show full text]
  • Grubhub Must Fend Off Hard-Charging Ubereats to Stay on Top
    Reverdy Johnson, [email protected] REPORT GrubHub Must Fend Off Hard-Charging UberEATS to Stay on Top Companies: AMZN, GRUB, YELP November 16, 2016 Report Type: ☐ Initial Coverage Previously Covered Full Report ☐ Report Update Research Question: Will GrubHub win the online food ordering battle? Summary of Findings Silo Summaries . GrubHub Inc. (GRUB) has a tall task ahead of it in fending off Uber 1) Restaurants Using GrubHub and Competitors Technologies Inc.’s UberEATS and in maintaining its supremacy in UberEATS is making a strong first impression and the online food ordering and delivery world. challenging GrubHub for supremacy. Of the five sources who use the new service, four said it is superior to . UberEATS is gaining steam as it rolls out its service nationwide. It is GrubHub and all others, very popular among readily accepted by restaurants based on its speedy delivery, consumers, and making gains on GrubHub. UberEATS Uber’s existing network of drivers, and the easy transition into was credited with providing a simple, seamless and fast user experience. Its large network of drivers, familiarity many consumers’ established Uber ride-sharing accounts. among consumers, brand recognition, flat delivery rate, . Six of the seven restaurant sources using UberEATS said it is better and photos of menu items create a platform that is than its competitors and is gaining ground on them, including growing quickly in cities where it has a presence while GrubHub. It boasts a simple, clean and fast user experience, offers providing immediate results for restaurant owners and operators. Still, GrubHub remains the category’s leader photos of the food items (unlike GrubHub), and charges consumers based on its reach, experience, ordering accuracy, and a flat delivery rate that is often less expensive than others’ fees.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    2017 ANNUAL REPORT COR_2018_AnnualReport_FINAL.indd 1 3/12/18 1:36 PM April 2018 Fellow Grubhub shareholders, 2017 was a great year for us. Restaurants across the country are making delivery a top priority as more people than ever choose to order takeout online. We added more than 6 million diners to the Grubhub platform, increasing the demand pool available to our restaurant partners by more than 75 percent. We sent more than 330,000 orders to restaurants each day through Grubhub, driving $3.8 billion in revenue for our restaurant partners last year. As well-known restaurant brands continue to embrace delivery as a channel to drive growth, we are scaling our delivery operations to reach all corners of the country. We ended the year with our delivery services operating in more than 80 markets, and we plan on expanding to 100 additional markets in 2018. While growing our delivery coverage from essentially zero to more than $1 billion in annualized gross food sales in a little more than two years, we also achieved our goal of exiting the year with similar economics on orders that restaurants deliver for themselves and orders that Grubhub delivers on their behalf. This allows us to offer the best restaurant to a diner every time while maximizing profitability. From this expanded delivery coverage, we are well-positioned to work with more restaurant chains, closing out the year with over 100 enterprise relationships that complement our established network of independent restaurants. We signed new partnerships in 2017 with brands like The Cheesecake Factory, Maggiano's and Wawa, and expanded relationships with existing partners like Buffalo Wild Wings, Qdoba Mexican Eats and Boston Market.
    [Show full text]