DOCSLIB.ORG

For Proposed 340Km Mbeya –Tunduma–Sumbawanga

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
For Proposed 340Km Mbeya –Tunduma–Sumbawanga RESETTLEMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK (RPF) FOR PROPOSED 340KM MBEYA –TUNDUMA–SUMBAWANGA 400KV TRANSMISSION LINE AND ~4KM TUNDUMA SUBSTATION TO TANZANIA-ZAMBIA BORDER 330KV TRANSMISSION LINE AND ASSOCIATED SUBSTATION AT TUNDUMA AND SUMBAWANGA VOLUME I: MAIN RPF REPORT PROJECT PROPONENT: Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited (TANESCO), Umeme Park, Ubungo Area, P.O. Box 9024, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, Tel: +255 22 2451133, Fax: +255 22 2451149, E-mail: [email protected] PREPARED BY: Ms. Elizabeth J. Aisu Individual Consultant, P.O. Box 20177 Kampala-Uganda Tel: +256 772 616 489, Fax: +255 22 2451149, E-mail: [email protected] 14th April, 2018 LIST OF EXPERTS The following experts were involved during preparation of this Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) for Mbeya-Tunduma-Sumbawanga 400kV Power TL and ~4km of segment of 330kV TL from Tunduma Substation to TanZam border as part of study team: S/N NAME EXPERTISE 1. Ms. Elizabeth Aisu RAP and RPF specialist –Team Leader 2. Ms. Vaileth Kimaro Sociologist 3. Mr. Fikirini M. Mtandika Environmentalist 4. Mr. Izaria Luvanda Land Surveyor 5. District Valuers, District Land Officers and All District where proposed TL traversed District Community Development Officers i TABLE OF CONTENTS List of experts ............................................................................................................................. i Table of contents ........................................................................................................................ ii List of tables .............................................................................................................................. vi List of figures ........................................................................................................................... vii List of acronyms .................................................................................................................... viii Definitions................................................................................................................................. ix Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. xi CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 1 1.1 General Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Objective of the Resettlement Policy Framework ............................................................... 1 1.3 Methodology used to prepare the RPF................................................................................. 2 1.3.1 Literature reviews ............................................................................................................. 2 1.3.2 Consultations..................................................................................................................... 3 1.3.3 Checklist ........................................................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER 2: PROJECT DESCRIPTION .............................................................................. 4 2.1 Project Background .............................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Project location .................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Objectives of the policy on involuntary resettlement (OP 4.12) ......................................... 5 2.4 Guiding principles for resettlement of people displaced by the project .............................. 7 CHAPTER 3: LAND ACQUISITION AND LIKELY CATEGORIES OF IMPACTS ....... 10 3.1 Project Objective ................................................................................................................ 10 3.2 Project Components that May Require Resettlement ........................................................ 10 3.2.1 Transmission Line ........................................................................................................... 10 3.2.2 Substations ...................................................................................................................... 11 3.2.3 Access Roads .................................................................................................................. 12 3.3 Project Impacts................................................................................................................... 12 3.3.1 Types of Loss Due to Land Acquisition ......................................................................... 12 3.3.1.1 Loss of Assets or Access to Assets .............................................................................. 12 3.3.1.2 Land ............................................................................................................................. 13 3.3.1.3 House structures ........................................................................................................... 13 3.3.1.4 Agriculture ................................................................................................................... 13 3.3.1.5 Natural Assets: ............................................................................................................. 13 3.3.1.6 Public services and recreational grounds ..................................................................... 13 3.3.1.7 Loss of Rental Accommodation or Loss of Business Premises ................................... 13 3.3.1.8 Loss of Structures only (not land) ................................................................................ 13 3.3.1.9 Project Affected People (PAPs) ................................................................................... 13 CHAPTER: 4 SOCIO-ECONOMIC STUDIES .................................................................... 15 4.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 15 4.2 Methodology ...................................................................................................................... 15 4.3 Area of influence................................................................................................................ 15 4.4 Administrative structure..................................................................................................... 15 4.5 Governance Structure ......................................................................................................... 18 4.6 Land ownership and land tenure ........................................................................................ 18 4.7 Land acquisition ................................................................................................................. 19 4.8 Land use ............................................................................................................................. 19 ii 4.8.1 Mbeya region – Land Area, Land Use Pattern and Administrative Units ...................... 20 4.8.2 Songwe region – Land Area, Land Use Pattern and Administrative Units .................... 20 4.8.3 Rukwa region – Land Area, Land Use Pattern and Administrative Units ...................... 21 4.9 Population .......................................................................................................................... 21 4.9.1 Existing population ......................................................................................................... 21 4.9.2 Population density and trend ........................................................................................... 25 4.9.3 Population migration ....................................................................................................... 29 4.10 Agricultural activities ....................................................................................................... 30 4.11 Livestock keeping ............................................................................................................ 31 4.12 Socio-economic factors .................................................................................................... 32 4.12.1 Occupation .................................................................................................................... 32 4.12.2 Education ...................................................................................................................... 32 4.12.3 Health ............................................................................................................................ 33 4.12.4 Gender issues ................................................................................................................ 34 4.12.4.1 Women employment status ........................................................................................ 34 4.12.4.2 Level of control over earnings ................................................................................... 34 4.12.4.3 Women level of participation in decision making ..................................................... 35 4.13 Burial Sites ....................................................................................................................... 35 CHAPTER 5: TANZANIA POLICY AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK .................................. 36 5.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kigoma Airport
    The United Republic of Tanzania Ministry of Infrastructure Development Tanzania Airports Authority Feasibility Study and Detailed Design for the Rehabilitation and Upgrading of Kigoma Airport Preliminary Design Report Environmental Impact Assessment July 2008 In Association With : Sir Frederick Snow & Partners Ltd Belva Consult Limited Corinthian House, PO Box 7521, Mikocheni Area, 17 Lansdowne Road, Croydon, Rose Garden Road, Plot No 455, United Kingdom CR0 2BX, UK Dar es Salaam Tel: +44(02) 08604 8999 Tel: +255 22 2120447 Fax: +44 (02)0 8604 8877 Email: [email protected] Fax: +255 22 2120448 Web Site: www.fsnow.co.uk Email: [email protected] The United Republic of Tanzania Ministry of Infrastructure Development Tanzania Airports Authority Feasibility Study and Detailed Design for the Rehabilitation and Upgrading of Kigoma Airport Preliminary Design Report Environmental Impact Assessment Prepared by Sir Frederick Snow and Partners Limited in association with Belva Consult Limited Issue and Revision Record Rev Date Originator Checker Approver Description 0 July 08 Belva KC Preliminary Submission EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Introduction The Government of Tanzania through the Tanzania Airports Authority is undertaking a feasibility study and detailed engineering design for the rehabilitation and upgrading of the Kigoma airport, located in Kigoma-Ujiji Municipality, Kigoma region. The project is part of a larger project being undertaken by the Tanzania Airport Authority involving rehabilitation and upgrading of high priority commercial airports across the country. The Tanzania Airport Authority has commissioned two companies M/S Sir Frederick Snow & Partners Limited of UK in association with Belva Consult Limited of Tanzania to undertake a Feasibility Study, Detail Engineering Design, Preparation of Tender Documents and Environmental and Social Impact Assessments of seven airports namely Arusha, Bukoba, Kigoma, Tabora, Mafia Island, Shinyanga and Sumbawanga.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Transport and Firm Productivity: Evidence from Tanzania
    WPS8173 Policy Research Working Paper 8173 Public Disclosure Authorized Rail Transport and Firm Productivity Evidence from Tanzania Public Disclosure Authorized Atsushi Iimi Richard Martin Humphreys Yonas Eliesikia Mchomvu Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Transport and ICT Global Practice Group August 2017 Policy Research Working Paper 8173 Abstract Railway transport generally has the advantage for large-vol- Rail transport is a cost-effective option for firms. How- ume, long-haul freight operations. Africa possesses ever, the study finds that firms’ inventory is costly. This significant railway assets. However, many rail lines are cur- is a disadvantage of using rail transport. Rail operations rently not operational because of the lack of maintenance. are unreliable, adding more inventory costs to firms. The The paper recasts light on the impact of rail transportation implied elasticity of demand for transport services is esti- on firm productivity, using micro data collected in Tanza- mated at −1.01 to −0.52, relatively high in absolute terms. nia. To avoid the endogeneity problem, the instrumental This indicates the rail users’ sensitivity to prices as well as variable technique is used to estimate the impact of rail severity of modal competition against truck transportation. transport. The paper shows that the overall impact of rail The study also finds that firm location matters to the deci- use on firm costs is significant despite that the rail unit sion to use rail services. Proximity to rail infrastructure rates are set lower when the shipping distance is longer. is important for firms to take advantage of rail benefits. This paper is a product of the Transport and ICT Global Practice Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Tanzania MFR Summary Report
    TANZANIA August 20, 2018 Market Fundamentals Summary KEY MESSAGES The objective of this report is to document the basic market context Figure 1. Map of Tanzania for staple food and livestock production and marketing in Tanzania. The information presented is based on desk research, a field assessment using rapid rural appraisal techniques, and a consultation workshop with stakehoders in Tanzania. Findings from this report will inform regular market monitoring and analysis in Tanzania. Maize, rice, sorghum, millet, pulses (beans and peas), cassava and bananas (plantains) are the main staple foods in Tanzania. Maize is the most widely consumed staple in Tanzania and the country imports significant quantities of wheat to meet local demand for wheat flour. Consumption of other staples varies across the country based on local supply and demand dynamics. Cattle, goat and sheep are the major sources of red meat consumed in Tanzania. Tanzania’s cropping calendar follows two distinct seasonal patterns. The Msimu season covers unimodal rainfall areas in the south, west and central parts of the country while the Masika and Vuli seasons Source: FEWS NET (2018). cover bi-modal rainfall areas in the north and eastern parts of the country (Figure 5). Figure 2. Tanzania’s average self sufficiency status for key staple foods (2014/15 – 2017/18) As a member of the East Africa Community (EAC) and the Southern African Development Community (SADC), Tanzania plays an important role in regional staple food trade across East and Southern Africa (Annex III). The country is generally a surplus producer of staple cereals and pulses, and exports significant quantities of these commodities to neighboring countries in East and Southern Africa inlcuding Kenya, Malawi, Zambia, Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi and the Democratice Republic of Congo (Figure 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Tanzania: Floods 23 January 2008
    DREF operation n° MDRTZ006 GLIDE n° FL-2008-000011-TZA Tanzania: Floods 23 January 2008 The International Federation’s Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF) is a source of un-earmarked money created by the Federation in 1985 to ensure that immediate financial support is available for Red Cross and Red Crescent response to emergencies. The DREF is a vital part of the International Federation’s disaster response system and increases the ability of national societies to respond to disasters. CHF 88,353 (USD 81,012 or EUR 55,648) has been allocated from the Federation’s Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF) to support the Tanzania Red Cross National Society (TNRCS) in assisting some 7,500 affected people in Tanzania floods. Summary: Areas of western, southwest and parts of the coastal province of Tanzania (Rukwa, Kigoma, Ruvuma, Pwani) have been receiving seasonal rains normal to above normal. Heavy downpours have been reported in Sumbawanga municipal in Rukwa region where three suburbs of Izia, Katandala and Sumbawanga are the most affected. Assessment reports have indicated that a total of 1,117 families are in need of assistance in basic items to sustain their living; blankets, water buckets, insecticide-treated nets (ITNs), laundry soap and construction items to the most vulnerable families including women-headed families and people living with HIV (PLWHIV). This operation is expected to be implemented over 3 month, and will therefore be completed by 18 April, 2008; a Final Report will be made available three months after the end of the operation. <click here for the DREF budget, here for contact details, or here to view the map of the affected area> The situation Areas of western, coastal and southwest of Tanzania such as Rukwa, Kigoma, Ruvuma, Pwani have recently experienced heavy rains.
    [Show full text]
  • Vulnerability of Elderly Women to Witchcraft Accusations Among the Fipa of Sumbawanga, 1961-2010 Hamisi Mathias Machangu
    Journal of International Women's Studies Volume 16 | Issue 2 Article 17 Jan-2015 Vulnerability of Elderly Women to Witchcraft Accusations among the Fipa of Sumbawanga, 1961-2010 Hamisi Mathias Machangu Follow this and additional works at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws Part of the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Machangu, Hamisi Mathias (2015). Vulnerability of Elderly Women to Witchcraft Accusations among the Fipa of Sumbawanga, 1961-2010. Journal of International Women's Studies, 16(2), 274-284. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol16/iss2/17 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. This journal and its contents may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. ©2015 Journal of International Women’s Studies. Vulnerability of Elderly Women to Witchcraft Accusations among the Fipa of Sumbawanga, 1961-2010 By Hamisi Mathias Machangu1 Abstract Witchcraft accusations have led to the killings of elderly women in many parts of sub- Saharan Africa. For many years, the violence has had major effects on people’s health. Witchcraft accusations have been the source of people’s loss of limbs and deaths among elderly women in Africa. Although these problems have had effects on elderly women, there has been very little reconstruction of their history in Tanzania. Thus, the aim of this article is to rewrite the history of the vulnerability of the elderly women to witchcraft accusations among the Fipa of Sumbawanga district of Tanzania.
    [Show full text]
  • The United Republic of Tanzania
    The United Republic of Tanzania Ministry of Infrastructure Development Tanzania Airports Authority Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Feasibility Study and Detailed Design for The Rehabilitation and Upgrading of Kigoma Airport Final Design Report Public Disclosure Authorized Environmental Impact Assessment November 2009 Public Disclosure Authorized In Association With: Sir Frederick Snow & Partners Ltd Belva Consult Limited Corinthian House, PO Box 7521, Mikocheni Area, 17 Lansdowne Road, Croydon, January 2008 Rose Garden Road, Plot No 455, United Kingdom CR0 2BX, UK Dar es Salaam Tel: +44(02) 08604 8999 Tel: +255 22 2775910 Fax: +44 (02)0 8604 8877 Email: [email protected] Fax: +255 22 2775919 Web Site: www.fsnow.co.uk Email: [email protected] The United Republic of Tanzania Ministry of Infrastructure Development Tanzania Airports Authority Feasibility Study and Detailed Design for the Rehabilitation and Upgrading of Kigoma Airport Final Design Report Environmental Impact Assessment Prepared by Sir Frederick Snow and Partners Limited in association with Belva Consult Limited Issue and Revision Record Rev Date Originator Checker Approver Description 0 July 08 Belva KC Preliminary Submission 1 Mar 09 Belva KC Final Draft Submission 2 Nov 09 Belva KC Re-scoping Submission EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Introduction The Government of Tanzania through the Tanzania Airports Authority is undertaking a feasibility study and detailed engineering design for the rehabilitation and upgrading of the Kigoma airport, located in Kigoma-Ujiji Municipality, Kigoma region. The project is part of a larger project being undertaken by the Tanzania Airport Authority involving rehabilitation and upgrading of high priority commercial airports across the country.
    [Show full text]
  • The United Republic of Tanzania Prime Minister's
    THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA PRIME MINISTER’S OFFICE REGIONAL ADMINISTRATION AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT SUMBAWANGA DISTRICT COUNCIL THE ROLLING STRATEGIC PLAN (2016/ 20 17 – 20 20 / 20 2 1 ) DEC 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Sumbawanga Distr ict Council Strategic Plan (2016/17 – 2020 / 20 2 1 ) supersedes the (2010/2011 - 2014/2015) Strategic Plan whose tenure came to an end in June 20 15 . Besides expiry of its validity, hence lack of legal mandate, a review of the Sumbawanga District Council Strategic Plan is necessitated by the external and internal changes that have a bearing in efficient operations of the Council . The (2016/17 – 2020 /20 21 ) strategic plan therefore is prepared on the basis of the achievements and impediments of the (2010/2011 - 2014/20 15) Plan with a view to enhancing the District Council ability to respond and effectively carry out its core functions and more respond to external and internal challenges. A revised Plan is also expected to efficiently optimize the use of the increasingly limited and competitive resources while seizing the emerging development opportunities concomitant to growth vision of the district. Formulation of this third strategic plan was participatory where a wide range of stakeholders were involved. This was nece ssary to enhance ownership and acceptability to stakeholders so as to have smooth implementation of the plan. SITUATION ANALYSIS Given the achievements made during the implementation of the (2010/2011 - 2014/2015) Strategic Plan and the constraints faced b y S umbawanga D istrict C ouncil (SDC) in the course of implementing that Plan, the key issues which need to be addressed during the next five years are: Increasing the financial capacity and sustainability for implementing all planned activities .
    [Show full text]
  • Tanzania Country Profile Report
    i | P a g e TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................ i LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................. v LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................. vi COUNTRY FACT SHEET ................................................................................................... vii LIST OF ACRONYMS ....................................................................................................... viii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... x 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ........................................................................ 1 1.1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Background ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3. Objectives of the Report ............................................................................................................ 2 1.4. Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 2 1.5. Structure of the Report ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Millennium Challenge Compact Between the United States Of
    MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE COMPACT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ACTING THROUGH THE MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE CORPORATION AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA ACTING THROUGH THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE COMPACT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Article 1. Goal and Objectives.......................................................................................... 1 Section 1.1 Compact Goal ............................................................................................. 1 Section 1.2 Project Objectives ....................................................................................... 1 Article 2. Funding and Resources..................................................................................... 1 Section 2.1 MCC Funding ............................................................................................. 1 Section 2.2 Compact Implementation Funding ............................................................. 2 Section 2.3 Disbursement .............................................................................................. 2 Section 2.4 Interest......................................................................................................... 2 Section 2.5 Government Resources; Budget ................................................................. 2 Section 2.6 Limitations on the Use of MCC Funding ................................................... 2 Section 2.7 Taxes..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Resignations and Appointments Diocese Mbeya Iringa
    N. 181221b Friday 21.12.2018 Resignations and Appointments Erection of the ecclesiastical province of Mbeya, Tanzania, and appointment of the first metropolitan archbishop Appointment of bishop of Barinas, Venezuela Erection of the ecclesiastical province of Mbeya, Tanzania, and appointment of the first metropolitan archbishop The Holy Father has erected the ecclesiastical province of Mbeya, Tanzania, elevating it to a metropolitan Church, and assigning as suffragan Churches the dioceses of Iringa and Sumbawanga. The Pope has appointed H.E. Msgr. Gervas John Mwasikwabhila Nyaisonga, currently bishop of Mpanda, as the first metropolitan archbishop of Mbeya, Tanzania. Data relating to the dioceses of the new ecclesiastical province The new ecclesiastical province of Mbeya in Tanzania will have as suffragans: the diocese of Iringa (currently belonging to the province of Songea) and the diocese of Sumbawanga (currently belonging to the province of Tabora). Data relating to the dioceses of the new ecclesiastical province Diocese Mbeya Iringa Sumbawanga Area (km2) 60,348 43,218 28,654 Inhabitants 2,783,000 2,552,116 1,323,080 Catholics 548,000 695,366 805,388 Parishes 48 38 21 2 Diocesan priests 73 72 53 Religious priests 15 38 7 Men religious 15 332 71 Women religious 299 667 348 * The data refer to the Pontifical Yearbook 2018. Appointment of bishop of Barinas, Venezuela The Holy Father has appointed as bishop of Barinas, Venezuela, H.E. Msgr. Jesús Alfonso Guerrero Contreras, O.F.M. Cap., currently bishop of Machiques. H.E. Msgr. Jesús Alfonso Guerrero Contreras, O.F.M. Cap. H.E. Msgr. Jesús Alfonso Guerrero Contreras, O.F.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Setembre De 2021 Estats Units D’Amèrica
    Setembre de 2021 Estats Units d’Amèrica ... B-3, E-5 Moldàvia ... E-12 Estats sobirans Estònia ... D-12 Mònaco ... E-9 Etiòpia ... I-13 Mongòlia ... E-16 Federació Russa ... C-15, D-15 Montenegro ... F-9 Fiji ... J-20, K-1 Myanmar ... H-16 Filipines ... H-18 Namíbia ... K-12 Afganistan ... G-14 Finlàndia ... D-12 Nauru ... I-20 Albània ... F-12 França ... F-11 Nepal ... G-15 Alemanya ... E-11 Gabon ... I-11 Nicaragua ... H-6 Algèria ...G-11 Gàmbia ... H-9 Níger ... H-11 Andorra ... E-9 Geòrgia ... F-13 Nigèria ... H-11 Angola ... J-12 Ghana ... I-10 Noruega ... C-11 Antigua i Barbuda ... H-7 Grècia ... F-12 Nova Zelanda ... M-1, M-20 Aotearoa ... M-1, M-20 Grenada ... H-7 Oman ... H-14 Aràbia Saudita ... H-13 Guatemala ... H-5 Països Baixos ... E-11 Argentina, l’ ... L-7 Guinea ... H-10 Pakistan ... G-14 Armènia ... F-13 Guinea Bissau ... H-9 Palau ... I-18 Austràlia ... K-18 Guinea Equatorial ... I-11 Panamà ... I-6 Àustria ... E-11 Guyana ... I-7 Papua Nova Guinea ... I-19 Azerbaidjan ... F-13 HaitÌ ... H-6 Paraguai, el ... K-7 Bahames ... G-6 Hondures ... H-6 Perú, el ... J-6 Bahrain ... G-13 Hongria ... F-12 Polònia ... E-12 Bangladesh ... H-16 Iemen ... H-13 Portugal ... F-10 Barbados ... H-7 Illes Marshall ... H-20 Qatar ... G-13 Belarús ... E-12 Índia ... H-15 Regne Unit ... E-10 Bèlgica ... E-11 Indonèsia ... I-17 República Centreafricana ... I-12 Belize ... H-6 Iran ... G-14 República de les Seychelles ..
    [Show full text]
  • LOW FLOW in RUKWA REGION Sumbawanga Area Mpanda Area
    04 - 90 NVE NORWEGIAN WATER RESOURCES AND ENERGY ADMIMSTRATION Kjell Repp LOW FLOW IN RUKWA REGION Sumbawanga area Mpanda area Namanyere area f 1.(4 4.4r, ~111. itePc NVE NORAD UNITEDREPUBLIC NORWEGIAN NORWEGIANAGENCY OF TANZANIA WATER RESOURCESAND FOR DEVELOPMENT MINISTRYOF WATER ENERGYADMINISTRATION COOPERATION Division of development assistance Utig NVE NORWEGIAN WATERRESOURCESAND ENERGYADMINISTRATION Tittel/Title Nr/No LOW FLOW IN RUKWA REGION 04-90 SUMBAWANGAAREA MPANDA AREA NAMANYERE AREA Dato/Date June 1990 Forfatter(e)/Saksbehandler(e)/ Executive Officer(s) ISBN Kjell Repp Hydrological Department The Directorate of Water Resources, NVE Sammendrag/Abstract The report gives details from runoff analyses in several rivers in Rukwa Region. New rating curves for several small rivers have been established in order to investigate water supply possibilities. Emneord/Subject Terms Ansvarlig underskrift/ Project Co-ordinator Tanzania Hydrology Water Supply Egil Skofteland NVE/NORAD-Coordinator NVE NORAD UNITEDREPUPLIC NORWEGIAN NORWEGIANAGENCY OF TANZANIA WATER RESOURCESAND FOR DEVELOPMENT MINISTRYOF WATER ENERGYADMINISTRATION COOPERATION Division of development assistance Contents Page SUMBAWANGA AREA 3 1.0 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA AND THE HYDROLOGY 3 2.0 THE DATA BASE 3 2.1 General 5 2.2 Kanantumbi River 5 2.3 Muva River 6 2.4 Momoka River 6 2.5 Ndua River (Kiswite water intake) 6 2.6 Other rivers 6 2.7 Rainfall 7 3.0 RUNOFF ANALYSIS 9 3.1 General 9 3.2 Rating 9 3.2.1 Kanantumbi River 9 3.2.2 Muva River 9 3.2.3 Luiche River 12 3.2.4
    [Show full text]