DOCSLIB.ORG

Indonesia National Prisoner HIV and Syphilis Prevalence, Knowledge and Service Access Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Indonesia National Prisoner HIV and Syphilis Prevalence, Knowledge and Service Access Survey HIV and Syphilis Prevalence and Risk Behaviour Survey Among Prisoners 2010 in Prisons and Detention Centres in Indonesia ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Special thanks to the respondents who took part in this survey. Thank you to all the Heads of Prisons and Detentions Centers, and other prison officials and administrative staff from the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights who facilitated the survey processes. Research Advisor: Untung Sugiono, Bc.IP, SH, MM1 Principal Investigator: Muqowimul Aman, Bc.IP, SH1 Research Director: Pujo Harinto, Bc.IP, SSos, M.Si1 Technical Supervisor: Prof. Budi Utomo2 Research Team: Diah Ayu N.H1, Endar Tri A1, Harto1, Suzanne Blogg2, Nurlan Silitonga2, Aang Sutrisna3, Ratna Soehoed2, Adhe Aprasasti2, Alia Hartanti2, Sugih Hartono3, Nasrun Hadi3, Shinta Devita3, Gray Sattler4, Ade Aulia 4, Oscar Baraneche5, Wenita Indrasari6, Mashadi6, Deni Ahmad Fauzi7, Endang Budi Hastuti8, Naning Nugrahini8 and Lea Suganda9 ACASI Operator: Lamganda Sihombing, Ken Wijayanti, Wirawan Nugrahadi, Sarya Sutisna, Ignatius Supriyanto, Aminudin, Plamularsi Swandari and Husen al Habsy. Laboratory staff: Suyono, Dede Ahmad Maulana, Novriel Imamsyah, Dian Ari Yuana, Deddy Ujang Nuryadi, Agus Surya Hidayat, Sri Mulyati and Tri Setiyono. Field Coordinators: Bambang Mardi, Djoni Praptomo, Mutia Sari, Dyah Wandansari and Emi Sulistyati. Ministry of Justice and Human Rights1, Secretariate National AIDS Commission6, the Ministry of Health8, HCPI2, UNODC4, WHO5, UNAIDS Secretariate7, AIDSina Foundation3 and AusAID9. Funding for this survey was provided by UNODC and WHO through UNAIDS Program Acceleration Fund Mechanism, AusAID and HIV Cooperation Program for Indonesia (HCPI). 1 HIV and Syphilis Prevalence and Risk Behaviour Survey Among Prisoners 2010 in Prisons and Detention Centres in Indonesia LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AIDS Aquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome AusAID Australian Agency for International Development ART Anti Retroviral Therapy BNN National Narcotics Bureau (Badan Narkotika Nasional) BPS Central Bureau Statistics (Badan Pusat Statistik) HCPI HIV Cooperation Program for Indonesia HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus IDU Injecting Drug User IEC Information, Education and Communication IHPCP Indonesia HIV/AIDS Prevention and Care Project Lapas Prison (Lembaga Pemasyarakatan) MMT Methadone Maintenance Therapy NAC National AIDS Commission NS Needle syringe NSP Needle Syringe Program A measure of effect size, describing the strength of association or non- Odds Ratio independence between two binary data values PLHIV People Living with HIV The probability that a variate would assume a value greater than or equal to p value the observed value strictly by chance. PPS Proportional Probability to Size Rutan Detention centre STI Sexually Transmitted Infections TB Tuberculosis UNAIDS Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS UNGASS United Nation General Assembly on AIDS Special Session UNODC United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime USAID United States Agency for International Development VCT Voluntary Counseling and Testing WHO World Health Organization 2 HIV and Syphilis Prevalence and Risk Behaviour Survey Among Prisoners 2010 in Prisons and Detention Centres in Indonesia CONTENTS Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 List of Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 Contents ................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 List of Tables ....................................................................................................................................................................... 5 List of Figures ..................................................................................................................................................................... 6 PREFACE ............................................................................................................................................................................... 7 FOREWORD ......................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 12 1.1 Background .......................................................................................................................................................... 12 1.2 Aim and Objectives of Study .......................................................................................................................... 13 1.2.1 Aim ............................................................................................................................................................... 14 1.2.2 Objectives .................................................................................................................................................. 14 1.3 Implementation Process ................................................................................................................................. 14 2. Method ............................................................................................................................................................................ 14 2.1 Research Plan and Population ...................................................................................................................... 14 2.2 Sampling Strategy .............................................................................................................................................. 14 2.3 Study Process and Training of Survey Staff ............................................................................................ 15 2.4 Data Collection Process ................................................................................................................................... 16 2.5 Statistical Analysis of Survey ........................................................................................................................ 16 2.6 Ethics Approval .................................................................................................................................................. 16 3. Results ............................................................................................................................................................................. 16 3.1 Number and Profile of Respondents ......................................................................................................... 17 3.1.1 Refusal Rate and Number of Respondents .................................................................................. 17 3.1.2 Age ................................................................................................................................................................ 18 3.1.3 Education ................................................................................................................................................... 18 3 HIV and Syphilis Prevalence and Risk Behaviour Survey Among Prisoners 2010 in Prisons and Detention Centres in Indonesia 3.1.4 Marital Status ........................................................................................................................................... 19 3.1.5 Length of Imprisonment ..................................................................................................................... 20 3.1.6 Type of Violation and History of Imprisonment ....................................................................... 20 3.2 HIV/AIDS Knowledge ....................................................................................................................................... 22 3.3 Risk Behaviour .................................................................................................................................................... 24 3.3.1. Drug Use .................................................................................................................................................... 24 3.3.2 Sexual Practices and STIs .................................................................................................................... 26 3.3.3 Other Risk Factors ................................................................................................................................. 27 3.4 Program Exposure and Use of Services .................................................................................................... 29 3.4.1 Information Education and Communication Program ........................................................... 29 3.4.2 HIV Counseling and Testing ............................................................................................................... 33 3.4.3 Methadone Maintenance Therapy Program ............................................................................... 35 3.4.4 Needle Syringe Programs ..................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Information Needs, Accessibility and Utilization of Library Information Resources As Determinants of Psychological Well-Being of Prison Inmates in Nigeria
    29 INFORMATION NEEDS, ACCESSIBILITY AND UTILIZATION OF LIBRARY INFORMATION RESOURCES AS DETERMINANTS OF PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING OF PRISON INMATES IN NIGERIA Sunday Olanrewaju Popoola (1), Helen Uzoezi Emasealu (2) Department of Library, Archival and Information Studies & Senior Lecturer, University of Ibadan, Nigeria, drpo- [email protected] (1) Reference Librarian, University of Port Harcourt, Nigéria, [email protected] (2) Abstract information resources and psychological well-being of the inmates (r=0.665.p≤ 0.05). Also, there was significant rela- This paper investigated information needs, accessibility and tionship between: psychological well-being and accessibility utilization of library information resources as determinants of to library information resources by prison inmates (r=0.438; psychological well-being of prison inmates in Nigeria. Sur- p≤ 0.05); utilization of library information resources (r= vey research design of the correlation type was adopted. The .410; p≤05), and information needs (r=.454; p≤ 05). Result stratified random sampling was used to select 2875 inmates also indicated that information needs, accessibility to library from the population of 4,823 in 12 prisons with functional information resources and utilization of library information libraries. A questionnaire titled Information need, accessibil- resources are very critical ingredients in determining the ity, utilization and psychological well-being of Prison In- psychological well-being of prison inmates. Consequently, mates was used to collect data on the sampled 2875 inmates all stakeholders should endeavour to equip prison libraries out of which 2759 correctly completed questionnaire result- with relevant and current information resources for im- ing in a response rate of 95.34%, were used in data analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Prison Education in England and Wales. (2Nd Revised Edition)
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 388 842 CE 070 238 AUTHOR Ripley, Paul TITLE Prison Education in England and Wales. (2nd Revised Edition). Mendip Papers MP 022. INSTITUTION Staff Coll., Bristol (England). PUB DATE 93 NOTE 30p. AVAILABLE FROMStaff College, Coombe Lodge, Blagdon, Bristol BS18 6RG, England, United Kingdom (2.50 British pounds). PUB TYPE Information Analyses (070) EDRS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Adult Basic Education; *Correctional Education; *Correctional Institutions; Correctional Rehabilitation; Criminals; *Educational History; Foreign Countries; Postsecondary Education; Prisoners; Prison Libraries; Rehabilitation Programs; Secondary Education; Vocational Rehabilitation IDENTIFIERS *England; *Wales ABSTRACT In response to prison disturbances in England and Wales in the late 1980s, the education program for prisoners was improved and more prisoners were given access to educational services. Although education is a relatively new phenomenon in the English and Welsh penal system, by the 20th century, education had become an integral part of prison life. It served partly as a control mechanism and partly for more altruistic needs. Until 1993 the management and delivery of education and training in prisons was carried out by local education authority staff. Since that time, the education responsibility has been contracted out to organizations such as the Staff College, other universities, and private training organizations. Various policy implications were resolved in order to allow these organizations to provide prison education. Today, prison education programs are probably the most comprehensive of any found in the country. They may range from literacy education to postgraduate study, with students ranging in age from 15 to over 65. The curriculum focuses on social and life skills.
    [Show full text]
  • Problems of National Public and Private Law
    ISSN 2336‐5439 EUROPEAN POLITICAL AND LAW DISCOURSE • Volume 3 Issue 4 2016 PROBLEMS OF NATIONAL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE LAW Dmytro Yagunov, MSSc in Criminal Justice National expert of the Project of the Council of Europe «Further Support for the Penitentiary Reform in Ukraine» PRISON REFORM IN UKRAINE: SOME ANALYTICAL NOTES AND RECOMMENDATIONS On 18 May, 2016, the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine abolished the State Penitentiary Service of Ukraine (the SPS) as a central executive body. The Government decided: 1) to abolish the State Penitentiary Service and put all tasks and functions of state prison and probation policy on the Ministry of Justice; 2) to provide that the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine would be the successor of the State Penitentiary Service of Ukraine in sphere of the public prison and probation policy. The reform had led to radical and sometimes unexpected changes in the public administration of the penitentiary system of Ukraine. The question is whether these changes would leas to positive results. The prison reform of February ‐ May 2016 (taken as a whole, and on the example of certain areas) has more than sufficient reasons to be evaluated critically, and sometimes extremely critically. This paper is focused on research of different directions of the prison reform announced by the Ministry of Justice in 2016. Key words: prison system, probation service, prison and probation reform, public administration of the penitentiary system of Ukraine, Ministry of Justice of Ukraine, State Penitentiary Service of Ukraine, prison privatization, juvenile probation centers, recommendations for reform. Introduction At the end of 2015, the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine has declared 2016 as the Year of the prison reform.
    [Show full text]
  • WOIPFG's Investigative Report on the Falun Dafa Practitioners' Coerced
    追查迫害法轮功国际组织 World Organization to Investigate the Persecution of Falun Gong To investigate the criminal conduct of all institutions, organizations, and individuals involved in the persecution of Falun Gong; to bring such investigation, no matter how long it takes, no matter how far and deep we have to search, to full closure; to exercise fundamental principles of humanity; and to restore and uphold justice in society WOIPFG’s Investigative Report on the Falun Dafa Practitioners’ Coerced Production of Forced Labor Products in the Chinese Communist Party’s Prisons and Labor Camps April 3, 2018 Table of Contents Forword Ⅰ. Slave Labor Production in Mainland China: Forms and Scale. (I) Prisons with Slave Labor Production in the Name of an Enterprise (II) Prisons, labor camps and detention centers that produces slave labor products and the companies that commission their services 1. Slave labor products produced in prisons and the companies that commission them 1.1 Hangzhou Z-shine industrial Co., Ltd. relies on 38 prisons for production 1.2 Zhejiang Province No. 1, No. 4, No. 5 and No. 7 Prisons and Quzhou Haolong Clothing Co., Ltd 1.3 Jiamusi Prison and Zhejiang Goodbrother Shoes Co., Ltd 1.4 Liaoning Province Women’s Prison and related companies 1.5 Shanghai Women’s Prison and related companies 1.6 Heilongjiang Tailai Prison and South Korean brand MISSHA 1.7 Shanghai prisons, Shanghai forced labor camps and related companies 1.8 Collaboration between Shanghai Tilanqiao Prison and Shanghai Soap Co., Ltd., Shanghai Jahwa Corporation 2. Slave Labor Products Made in Forced Labor Camps and the Companies that Commissioned them 2.1 Hebei Province Women’s Labor Camp and Related Companies 2.1.1 Hebei Yikang Cotton Textile Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Information Packet
    MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES ADMINISTRATION FAMILY INFORMATION PACKET CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES ADMINISTRATION FAMILY INFORMATION PACKET TABLE OF CONTENTS Department Mission…………………………………………………………………………….2 CRIME VICTIMS’ RIGHTS INFORMATION .................................................................................. 2 DISCIPLINE - Prisoner Discipline .................................................................................... 3 ELECTRONIC MESSAGES - Sending Emails to Prisoners via JPAY ......................... .10 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) ................................................................ 10 GRIEVANCES - Prisoner/Parolee Grievance Process .................................................. 11 HEALTH CARE - The Rights of Prisoners to Physical and Mental Health Care ........... 13 EDUCATION ………………………………………………………………………………….16 JPAY .............................................................................................................................. 17 MAIL – Sending Mail to a Prisoner ................................................................................ 17 MARRIAGE – Marrying a Prisoner ................................................................................ 18 MONEY - Sending Money to a Prisoner via GTL ........................................................... 19 OFFENDER TRACKING INFORMATION SYSTEM (OTIS) .........................................20 ORIENTATION FOR PRISONERS ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • China – CHN37989 – Laogai – Laojiao – Re-Education Through Labor
    Country Advice China China – CHN37989 – Laogai – Laojiao – Re-education through labor – Black jails – Christians 12 January 2011 1. Please advise whether reports indicate that “compulsory re-education classes” or local “brainwashing” classes were utilised by the authorities in Fujian or China more broadly during the period 1988 – 2007 and whether there are any descriptions of such classes being run at schools, in particular as may apply to their discouragement of the Christian faith? The Laogai Research Foundation provides comprehensive information on China‟s system of labour camps. It provides the following definitions: Laogai is „reform through labour‟ and laojiao is „reeducation through labour‟. According to its latest report, covering the period 2007 – 2008 laojiao „reeducation through labor‟ is a component of the Laogai system. The laojiao „reeducation through labor‟ allows for the arrest and detention of petty criminals for up to three years without formal charge of trial, and this system is not considered by the Chinese government to qualify as a prison.1 The entire Laogai system is composed of approximately one thousand camps. The legislative framework for the institution of the Laogai was established in 1954 as part of the “Regulations on Reform through Labor”.2 The Handbook states that because of the closed and secret nature of the Laogai system, it is impossible to provide a precise and accurate record of the exact number of laogai camps and the number of inmates who are detained therein. The Chinese government authorities consider that data pertaining to the laogai system are state secrets and for this reason do not allow outside entities to access these camps.
    [Show full text]
  • Tomorrow's Prisons
    Tomorrow’sPrisons: Designingthefutureprisonestate RickMuirandIanLoader April2010 ©ippr2010 InstituteforPublicPolicyResearch Challengingideas– Changingpolicy 1 ippr |Tomorrow’sPrisons:Designingthefutureprisonestate Contents Aboutippr ...........................................................................................................................2 Abouttheauthors..............................................................................................................2 Acknowledgements............................................................................................................. 2 AboutWatesGiving ............................................................................................................ 3 Executivesummary ............................................................................................................ 4 1.Introduction ................................................................................................................... 6 2.Prisondesignandpublicpolicy ...................................................................................... 7 3.Anoverviewoftheprisonestate.................................................................................... 9 4.Thechallengesfacingtheprisonestate ....................................................................... 14 5.Alternativefuturesfortheprisonestate....................................................................... 26 6.Conclusion....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE FEATURE by Kelly Virella / Photographs by Marc Fader / Illustrations by David Senior Behind Bars: Love, Sex, Rape and New York’S Women Prisoners
    THE FEATURE By Kelly Virella / Photographs by Marc Fader / Illustrations by David Senior Behind Bars: Love, Sex, Rape and New York’s Women Prisoners Reporting assistance by Catherine Dunn, Becca Fink, Isabella Moschen, Joshua Peguero, Barry Shifrin, Tiffany Walden 12 Love, Sex, Rape and New York’s Women Prisoners City Limits / Vol. 35 / No. 2 CHAPTER ONE Junior’s, a 60-year- old institution, is “as Brooklyn as it gets.” But the Junior’s brand is known well beyond the borough’s borders. Sex, Love andViolenceNew York State’s Prison Sex-Abuse Problem ne day in the visiting room of New York State’s Albion Correctional Facility, LaTrisa Hyman heard her friend and fellow inmate shriek, “He proposed to me! He proposed to me!” Looking across the room, she saw her friend’s elated new fiancé, still on one knee, saying, “She said yes!” The bride-to-be was beaming. She had told Hyman, during previous walks in the recreation yard, that she was in love, but Hyman didn’t expect her engagement. Hyman and the other inmates jumped up from their tables to rush over to the couple and congratulate them but sank back into their seats when the correctional officers guarding the room began yelling at them. The officers needed to maintain order in the room, but their reac- tion may also have been colored by the identity of the man asking for the inmate’s hand: He was one of their own—a correctional officer. “Sit down!” they yelled. Thirty minutes later, when visiting time ended and the inmates queued up to return to their housing units, the newly engaged inmate showed Hyman the ring, a gold band with a sparkling, roughly half-carat diamond in the center and smaller stones along the sides.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychological Therapy in Prisons and Other Secure Settings
    Downloaded by [University of Defence] at 01:43 24 May 2016 Psychological Therapy in Prisons and Other Secure Settings Downloaded by [University of Defence] at 01:43 24 May 2016 Psychological Therapy in Prisons and Other Secure Settings Edited by Joel Harvey and Kirsty Smedley Downloaded by [University of Defence] at 01:43 24 May 2016 Published by Willan Publishing 2 Park Square Milton Park Abingdon Oxon OX14 4RN Published simultaneously in the USA and Canada by Willan Publishing 270 Madison Avenue New York NY 10016 © The editors and contributors 2010 All rights reserved; no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the Publishers or a licence permitting copying in the UK issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency Ltd, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. First published 2010 ISBN 978-1-84392-799-0 paperback 978-1-84392-800-3 hardback British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Downloaded by [University of Defence] at 01:43 24 May 2016 Project managed by Deer Park Productions, Tavistock, Devon Typeset by GCS, Leighton Buzzard, Bedfordshire Printed and bound by T.J. International, Padstow, Cornwall (01) Prelims.indd 4 28/09/2010 10:57:14 Contents List of figures and tables ix List of abbreviations xi Acknowledgements xv Notes on contributors xvii Foreword by Graham J. Towl xxiii
    [Show full text]
  • Justice As an Afterthought: Women and the Montana Prison System
    -_^_H_fe^?"i_B_l (^y [as an Afterthought] Women and the Montana Prison System ^^m^m by Ellen Baumler l__________________1 Bessie Fisher claimed she only borrowed the pistol to scare Chick Malone into returning her ten dollars. He had taken the money from her for safekeeping, so she could get her dress out of pawn. But when Bessie rapped on Chick's door in the Owl lodging house that Sunday morning in Butte in 1901, Cassie "Big Eva" Frye answered?and Big Eva was a jealous woman. The two exchanged words. Big Eva lunged ^^^^^^^^| at her, and Bessie fired.1 ___________HNK1 _-_-_-_-_-_-___bp 41 Montana Historical Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Montana: The Magazine of Western History www.jstor.org JWj the sensational court case that twenty years in the Montana State Prison at Deer followed, Bessie claimed self-defense. After Lodge. Fisher entered the prison on June 20, 1901, all, she weighed less than 100 pounds, and and served half her sentence before being paroled in Big Eva carried 190 on her nearly six-foot frame. 1911, at which point she disappeared completely from The prosecuting attorney led the all-male jury to the historical record.2 the Richards undertaking parlor to view Big Eva's Bessie Fisher and Big Eva Frye?and hundreds remains, laid out in a cream-colored burial robe in a of women like them?faced overwhelming odds in silver-trimmed casket. Big Eva's crib-row coworkers eking out an existence in late-nineteenth- and early wept over banks of floral offerings sent by family and twentieth-century Montana.
    [Show full text]
  • Prison Activist Resource Directory
    PARC Prisoner Support Directory - Last Updated April 2013 1 Core Volunteers B♀ (rita d. brown) Pat Foley Greetings, April 2013 Scott Nelson Welcome to the 2013 edition of the PARC Prisoner's Resource Directory, which has been fully Sissy Pradier updated as of April 2013. We wish to thank those readers who have written back this past year with letters Penny Schoner and stories and who have returned the evaluation forms, as those allow us to get a better idea of the true readership of the directory and let us know which direction to take when adding new categories or Taeva Shefler information. Special thanks again to those who pass on the directory – according to your reports, each Mindy Stone directory is viewed by more than 15 people. This edition includes many new resources including a section about the various Innocence Community Projects that are continuing to expand throughout the US in response to the soaring number of prisoner Advisory Board exonerations due to actual innocence (conservative estimates are that between 5 to 10 percent of prisoners are actually innocent of the crimes for which they are currently serving sentences). Many of the new B♀ (rita d. brown) projects now accept cases where evidence other than DNA is used to support the prisoner's claims. Rose Braz Angela Davis We’ve also included a new section about post-secondary (college degree) educational opportunities now available through individual state prison systems, or offered at a select few of the prisons Linda Evans in those states. This is a new trend, as some prisons are now partnering with local colleges and universities Pam Fadem to provide free degree-earning programs by providing college-level classes in their prisons.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Victimization Reported by Former State Prisoners, 2008
    U.S. Department of Justice Offi ce of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics National Former Prisoner Survey, 2008 Sexual Victimization Reported by Former State Prisoners, 2008 Parole/community supervision oces Allen J. Beck, Ph.D. BJS Statistician Candace Johnson, Ph.D. Principal Research Scientist, NORC May 2012, NCJ 237363 BJS Bureau of Justice Statistics The Bureau of Justice Statistics is the James P. Lynch statistics agency of the U.S. Department of Director Justice. James P. Lynch is director. BJS Website: This compendium was written by Allen J. www.bjs.gov Beck, BJS Statistician, and Candace Johnson, NORC Research Scientist. Jessica Rexroat, [email protected] BJS intern, verified the report. BJS statisticians Christopher J. Mumola and Paige M. Harrison, under the supervision of Allen J. Beck, were project managers for the National Former Prisoner Survey. NORC, under a cooperative agreement and in collaboration with BJS staff, developed the survey and collected, processed, and analyzed the data. Candace Johnson with Pam Loose directed the project; Kirk Wolter and Ken Copeland guided sampling, weighting, and other statistical support services; Kris Talley and Patt Maugherman led field operations; Angela Herrmann directed telephone center activities; Mike Cooke managed TACASI development and IT support; Marissa Kiss, Stephanie Poland, Mehera Baugher, and Emily Frizzell assisted throughout the project; and Lynda Okeke and Fang Wang prepared statistical tables. Vanessa Curto and Jill Thomas edited the report, and Barbara Quinn
    [Show full text]