1789 Centre Street, West Roxbury, MA 02132
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2015 Severe Winter Weather Pattern Impacts - Supplemental Information
Attachment A: 2015 Severe Winter Weather Pattern Impacts - Supplemental Information March 27, 2015 Attachment A: 2015 Severe Winter Weather Pattern Impacts - Supplemental Information TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Weather/Meteorological Background ..........................................................................................................3 2. Emergency Protective Measures ..................................................................................................................6 Timeline .........................................................................................................................................................6 Snow Removal Operations ............................................................................................................................7 Snow Disposal Operations ......................................................................................................................... 11 3. Damage and Cost Estimates ...................................................................................................................... 11 Initial Damage Assessment (IDAs) for January 26-28 Severe Winter Weather ......................................... 11 FEMA/State Joint Preliminary Damage Assessments (PDAs) ................................................................... 12 Total Estimated Costs Associated with the Severe Winter Weather Pattern (January 26 through February 22, 2015) .................................................................................................................................................... -
MBTA Systemwide Survey 2008-09: Blue Line
MBTA Systemwide Passenger Survey A report produced by the Central Transportation Planning Staff for the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority MBTA Systemwide Passenger Survey Rapid Transit 2008–09 Rapid Transit Blue Line MBTA Systemwide Passenger Survey MBTA Systemwide Passenger Survey RAPID TRANSIT 2008–09 Blue Line Prepared for MBTA Planning and Development Joseph M. Cosgrove, Director Project Manager Thomas J. Humphrey Project Principal Elizabeth M. Moore Primary Authors Thomas J. Humphrey Steven P. Andrews Data Analysts Thomas J. Humphrey Steven P. Andrews Mariya A. Maslova Mary McShane Graphics Ken Dumas Cover Design Kim Noonan The preparation of this document was supported by the Federal Transit Administration through MBTA contract #X94PS25. Central Transportation Planning Staff Directed by the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization. The MPO is composed of state and regional agencies and authorities, and local governments. June 2010 ABSTRACT This Blue Line report belongs to a multivolume set of reports on the findings of a systemwide survey of Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority riders that was conducted for the MBTA by the Central Transportation Planning Staff (CTPS) in 2008–09. This survey covers all of the modes operated by the MBTA: bus (including trackless trolley), bus rapid transit,1 heavy rail (the Blue, Red, and Orange Lines), light rail (the Green Line and the Mattapan High-Speed Line), commuter rail, and boat. The most recent comparable systemwide passenger survey was conducted during 1993–2000. The purpose of the systemwide survey was to gather data that are not easily obtained through any other means. The data are used to update the regional travel-demand model that is routinely used by the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO); they are also available for use by other entities, public and private, as well as interested individuals. -
Roxbury Preparatory Charter High School Public Comments Via Website from 03‐29‐2019
Roxbury Preparatory Charter High School Public Comments via website from 03‐29‐2019 Comment: Created Date First Name Last Name Organization Opinion Comments 3/28/2019 Allison Friedmann Support I support Roxbury Prep building a high school in Roslindale. All the city's kids are ours and deserve a beautiful building and great location in order to get a great education. They are our future. So a small inconvenience like less parking and more traffic is well worth it. 3/28/2019 Amy Gitlin Support I support Roxbury Prep?s high school project proposed at 361 Belgrade Ave. in Roslindale. The school has gone above and beyond responding to community feedback. By reducing the size of the student body and square footage of the building, they have addressed two of the most common concerns about this project?size and congestion. The location at 361 Belgrade will give these students the facility they deserve with easy transportation access via the Commuter Rail and multiple bus lines. This new school will be an asset to both the students and the community. 3/28/2019 Talya Sokoll Support I support Roxbury Prep?s high school project proposed at 361 Belgrade Ave. in Roslindale. The school has gone above and beyond responding to community feedback. By reducing the size of the student body and square footage of the building, they have addressed two of the most common concerns about this project?size and congestion. The location at 361 Belgrade will give these students the facility they deserve with easy transportation access via the Commuter Rail and multiple bus lines. -
Ridership and Service Statistics
* * UMASS/AMHERST 3,2tW 036l' 4510 f^jssjjljuselts GOVffiJVMENr Transportation Authority (D Jjtf^^^.^^'I^^JSaj RIDERSHIP AND SERVICE STATISTICS Operations Directorate Planning Division November 1990 Edition . Third TABLE OF CONTENTS MOVING FORWARD iii SECTION I. GENERAL STATISTICS AND COSTS 1-1 A. MBTA Service Area Map 1-2 B. 78 Cities and Towns in the MBTA 1-3 C. Rapid Transit Map 1-A D. Commuter Rail Lines Map 1-5 E. MBTA Routes. Stations and Stops 1-6 F. Net Cost of Service Statement 1-7 SECTION II. RIDERSHIP STATISTICS (MBTA-Operated Services) 2-1 A. System Ridership (Linked/Unlinked Trips) Average Weekday and Monthly Ridership 2-2 B. Typical Monthly Variation in Daily Transit Ridership 2-6 C. Rapid Transit Lines - Passenger Counts 2-7 D. Rapid Transit Peak Load Point Line Volumes 2-9 E. MBTA Rapid Transit Downtown Transfer Stations 2-10 F. Green Line Surface Boardings (Typical Weekday Boardings) 2-14 G. Bus Ridership (Typical Weekday Boardings) 2-16 SECTION III. RIDERSHIP STATISTICS (Contract Services) 3-1 A. Suburban Transportation Program Monthly /Annual Ridership 3-2 B. Commuter Boat Daily and Monthly Ridership 3-3 C. Subsidized Private Carrier Service Average Monthly Ridership 3-5 D. THE RIDE Program (Trips Completed and Area Served) 3-6 E. Commuter Rail Daily Boarding Counts 3-9 F. Commuter Rail Annual Passengers and Average Weekday Inbound Passengers 3-11 SECTION IV. SCHEDULE STATISTICS A-1 A. Schedule Miles for Fall 1989 A-2 B. Trips Scheduled for Fall 1989 4-3 C. Revenue Mileage by Mode - 1972-1988 4-4 D. -
Introduction
BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Richard A. Davey, MassDOT Secretary and CEO and MPO Chairman Karl H. Quackenbush, Executive Director, MPO Staff MEMORANDUM DATE December 21, 2012 TO David Mohler, Executive Director of Planning Office of Transportation Planning, MassDOT FROM Thomas J. Humphrey, Chief Planner, Transit Service Planning Central Transportation Planning Staff RE MBTA Commuter Rail Passenger Count Results INTRODUCTION This memorandum summarizes the results of passenger counts conducted by CTPS on the MBTA commuter rail system between January and June 2012, and provides recommendations concerning the nature and frequency of future counts. Those counts included the number of passengers boarding and alighting from each train in each direction at each station on each line on one weekday. This level of detail is useful for many planning purposes but is not currently obtainable by any method other than manual counting. The data collected by CTPS were compared to several types of MBTA commuter rail ridership and ridership-related data that have historically been collected on an ongoing basis. The purpose of the comparison was to newly assess the accuracy of those ridership data and to inform recommendations regarding the nature and frequency of future counts. The data compared were: • Monthly ticket and pass sales figures • Daily conductor headcounts • Train Audits from the Massachusetts Bay Commuter Railroad Company (MBCR) that are more detailed than the conductor headcounts and are performed by conductors several times each year • MBCR peak-period passenger counts conducted at selected stations by consultants to MBCR twice each year1 1 A description of each type of data can be found in Appendix D, Glossary of Terms, and a full explanation of the various types of commuter rail passenger count methodologies can be found in section 6 of this memorandum, Limitations of Other Commuter Rail Ridership Information Sources. -
Boston Suburbs for Young Families
BOSTON SUBURBS FOR YOUNG FAMILIES A 2013 REPORT BY RUTH LERNER Discover Boston’s best neighborhoods and suburb communities TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents Why this report? __________________________________________________________________________________________ 1 Considerations in Choosing a Community ______________________________________________________________ 2 Home Buyer Resource ____________________________________________________________________________________ 2 Arlington __________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4 Brookline __________________________________________________________________________________________________ 6 Canton _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 8 Medfield _________________________________________________________________________________________________ 12 Medford _________________________________________________________________________________________________ 14 Milton ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 16 Natick ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 18 Needham ________________________________________________________________________________________________ 20 Newton __________________________________________________________________________________________________ 22 Wayland _________________________________________________________________________________________________