DOCSLIB.ORG

Neoen Australia Pty Ltd Windfarm, Solar Farm and Battery Storage Facility – ‘Crystal Brook Energy Park’

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Neoen Australia Pty Ltd Windfarm, Solar Farm and Battery Storage Facility – ‘Crystal Brook Energy Park’ SCAP Agenda Item 3.1.1 10 & 11 October 2018 Neoen Australia Pty Ltd Windfarm, Solar Farm and Battery Storage Facility – ‘Crystal Brook Energy Park’ Crystal Brook – Mid North 354/V003/18 TABLE OF CONTENTS SCAP REPORT ATTACHMENTS 1: LOCATION AND SITE PLANS 2: APPLICATION DOCUMENTS 3: AGENCY COMMENTS 4: COUNCIL COMMENTS 5: REPRESENTATIONS 6: APPLICANTS RESPONSE 7: DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROVISIONS 1 SCAP Agenda Item 3.1.1 10 & 11 October 2018 SCAP AGENDA ITEM: 3.1.1 Application Summary Application No 354/V003/18 (ID:3140) [KNet File: 2018/08788/01] KNET Reference #13187873 Applicant Neoen Australia Pty Ltd (Crown Sponsor: Department of the Premier and Cabinet) Proposal 125 MW Windfarm, 150MW Solar Farm, 130 MW Lithium-ion Battery and associated infrastructure Subject Land Various land parcels 3.5km NE of Crystal Brook (Mid North) Zone/Policy Area Primary Production Zone Relevant Authority Minister for Planning Role of the Section 49(7) & 7(c): the State Commission Assessment Commission: Panel must undertake an assessment of the proposal and report to the Minister for Planning. Lodgement Date 29 March 2018 (Date application submitted to DPTI) Council Port Pirie Regional Council Development Plan Port Pirie Regional Council Consolidated 31 October 2017 Categorisation Merit Public Notification Crown Representations 263, with 46 wishing to be heard (including 13 that are also representing others) Referral Agencies EPA, Commissioner for Highways (DPTI), DEW, NVC, AMLR NRM, NY NRM, DSD-AAR, Minister for the Mining Act, CFS, CASA, ElectraNet, SA Water, Epic Energy, Commonwealth Department of Defence. Officers Report Lee Webb – Senior Specialist (Environmental) Planner EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Neoen Australia Pty Ltd has lodged a Crown (S.49) development application (sponsored by the Department of the Premier and Cabinet) for the establishment of the Crystal Brook Energy Park, comprising a 125 MW Windfarm, 150MW Solar Farm, 130 MW (400 MWh) Energy Storage Facility and associated infrastructure. The site is located on various land parcels approximately 3.5km NE of Crystal Brook (approximately 23 km SE of Port Pirie) in the Mid North region of South Australia. Following public notification, 263 public representations were received. The majority of representations were in support of renewable energy and the solar and battery components. The main concerns raised were associated with the windfarm component of the proposal, primarily the visual impacts and potential health effects due to noise. In addition, proximity to the Crystal Brook township and surrounding residents (including those in the nearby Beetaloo Valley) was a key reason for objection. Concern was also expressed that siting of the wind turbines near the southern Flinders Ranges (and the Heysen Trail) would affect its tourism value. A number of representations also supported the proposal due to the advantages it could deliver for the region and the State, including economic benefits (especially employment and flow-on effects), sustainability aspects and the potential to help lower power prices. No formal objection was raised by the local Councils or relevant State Government agencies, although a number of assessment matters and technical details were sought or required further investigation by the applicant and/or the planning authority. 2 SCAP Agenda Item 3.1.1 10 & 11 October 2018 The key assessment outcomes in considering the appropriateness of the proposed development in the Primary Industry Zone of the Port Pirie Regional Council Development Plan are: • Establishes renewable energy generation and storage facilities in appropriate areas (primarily for the harnessing of wind and solar resources). • The proposed locations for each component have largely been cleared for mixed cropping and grazing use (especially the solar farm and battery facility sites) or have been modified by grazing (especially the windfarm site). • Existing primary production activities (primarily grazing) can continue during operation and after decommissioning. • Achieves suitable setback distances from residents (excluding landowners hosting turbines), the Crystal Brook township and major transport routes (especially the Augusta Highway). • It is acknowledged that the visual impact of the windfarm component on the rural landscape and amenity of the locality would be substantial. However, such impacts are envisaged by the local Development plan and local zoning controls. • Furthermore, the windfarm is sited an appropriate distance away from the southern extent of the Flinders ranges so as not to affect the regions tourism values. The impact on the affected part of the Heysen Trail would be minimal. • The proposed design minimises impacts to flora and fauna and does not affect any sites of conservation significance. • Safe access can be established to and from the project area, with construction traffic able to be satisfactorily managed. • Airfield operations are not unduly affected by the development. • The proposal would not result in increased bushfire risk (compared with other land uses) or affect firefighting capabilities. • Does not impact on sites of Aboriginal or European heritage significance. • Will have a negligible impact on existing or future adjoining land uses (in terms of the on-going use of that land for primary production or related activities). • Would not unduly affect telecommunications reception. • Can be constructed and operated so not to cause undue driver distraction. • Creates locally based employment (during construction and operation) and flow on economic benefits for Crystal Brook and the region. • Generates renewable energy and assists in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. From a strategic perspective, the proposal aligns with the electricity network priorities of South Australia, especially improving the reliability and security of the electricity grid and putting downward pressure on electricity prices through increased, locally based generation capacity. The proposal maximises the sites renewable resources by combining storage, solar and wind elements, with the combination of these technologies having the potential to produce a more consistent and reliable source of generation. In particular, the energy storage facility will further enhance reliability and allow for the provision of network stability services. ASSESSMENT REPORT 1. Strategic Context Climate change requires a coordinated response from government, industry, business, households and individuals to enable a beneficial transition to a low carbon economy. The electricity generation sector has a significant role to play in addressing the longer-term impacts of climate change, and South Australia’s electricity market has commenced its transition away from more traditional forms of generation to renewable energy (being around 50% of generation capacity in SA). 3 SCAP Agenda Item 3.1.1 10 & 11 October 2018 Renewable energy power generation developments have been encouraged in South Australia over the past 15 years through Government policy, due to the strategic need for local alternative energy sources that have low greenhouse gas emissions compared with traditional power generation. This direction was further facilitated in 2011/12 through the implementation of a Ministerial Statewide Wind Farms Development Plan Amendment (DPA) to incorporate policies that support renewable energy proposals, especially wind farm applications. These policies are now included in all Council Development Plans, and generally support such uses in Primary Production type zones. Since 2014, other types of renewable energy types have become more common – including large scale solar PV and pumped hydro proposals – encouraged through a mix of public policies, funding initiatives and direct action. A key policy focus has been the support for proposals that provide both generation and storage capacity and technologies for effective integration with the national electricity grid (and also to ensure reliability of supply). Consequently, the Mid North region has progressively been developed with wind farms due to the high grade wind resource and the close proximity of high voltage power transmission lines (i.e. that form inter-connections with the national electricity grid). More recently, the Upper Spencer Gulf region has become the focus for a range of renewable energy generation and storage proposals, including windfarms (i.e. at Lincoln Gap), solar farms (i.e. at Port Augusta and Whyalla), solar thermal tower (i.e. at Port Augusta), pumped hydro (i.e. at Goat Hill, Baroota) and hybrid ‘energy parks’ (i.e. near Port Augusta). In addition to the broader ‘clean’ energy advantages, a renewable power developments have the potential to deliver substantial economic benefits to regional communities (which often rely on two main industries - agriculture and mining), by helping to broaden its economic base and assist in reversing the ongoing trend of employment and population decline. Direct benefits would result from landowners having increased income from land rental for turbines/ solar farms and the use of local contractors and suppliers of goods and services. Flow on effects would arise from servicing the construction work force and, to a lesser extent, the operational workers. The proposal aligns with the strategic electricity network priorities of South Australia, especially improving the reliability and security of the electricity grid and putting downward pressure on electricity prices through increased, locally based generation capacity. The transition
Load more

Recommended publications
  • February 2018
    Jamestown Journal email: [email protected] Circulation 1600 Vol 27. No. 1. $20,000 AVAILABLE FOR COMMUNITY PROJECTS Due to the outstanding success of the 2017 Ram & Ewe Ball, the committee, in partnership with Apex Jamestown, has $20,000 to give away to local community projects. The Ram and Ewe Ball was started in 2007 with the idea of bringing young people together, reducing social isolation by encouraging networking, and providing an opportunity for people to meet in a rural location. The funds raised by the ball have been donated to various charities and community projects over the last 10 years. In early 2017 we donated to local projects including swimming pool accessibil- ity upgrades, Bowling Club grounds improvements, Diggers Walk Signage, Wig Library, Railway Mu- seum upkeep, JPFNC canteen upgrade, Lions Catering Van and relocating the Canon to Memorial Park. We are very eager to continue this in 2018. We welcome you to send your submissions via email to ramnewe- [email protected], or by post to PO Box 349, Jamestown. Submissions must include the name of your organisation/community group, amount of money requested and what the money will go towards. Submissions close on 12th March 2018. The Ram and Ewe Ball donation contributed towards the Jamestown Lions Club new Catering Van which has replaced the old van pictured FOR SALE - 6952 RM WILLIAMS WAY JAMESTOWN FOR RENT - 6 CRONIN ST JAMESTOWN 177 ACRES, STONE HOME & SHEDDING - $495,000 NEAT & TIDY - $200 PER WEEK • Located 4kms north of town, well setup for livestock • Recently
    [Show full text]
  • Maloney Field Services Forecast Site Values SA Power Networks July 2014
    Attachment 20.5 Maloney Field Services: Forecast Site Values SA Power Networks July 2014 Valuation Forecast Site Values SA Power Networks July 2014 SA Power Networks Forecast Site Values Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 1 DEFINITION & METHODOLOGY ADOPTED 1 GENERAL COMMENTS 3 DECLARATION 3 DISCLAIMER 4 CERTIFICATION 5 Appendix 1 SA Power Networks Forecast Site Values Appendix 2 Distribution Lessor Corporation Forecast Site Values Appendix 3 Future Sites to be Acquired Forecast Site Values Appendix 4 Expert’s Qualifications of Experience J:\CLIENT\SA Power Networks\Revenue Reset 2015-2020\Report\SA Power Networks Forecast Site Values Date Printed: August 19, 2014 July2014.Docx SA Power Networks Forecast Site Values Introduction The following report has been prepared in accordance with written instructions provided by Ms Ashley Muldrew, Regulatory Analyst for SA Power Networks on 8 July 2014. The said instructions were to provide an assessment of site values as follows: 1. Forecast site values for existing properties in the ownership of Distribution Lessor Corporation and SA Power Networks from financial year 2014/2015 through to 2019/2020. 2. Provide consolidation and estimated site values for future site acquisitions and forecast site values for each parcel of land from the date of proposed acquisition through to 2019/2020. The valuer confirms that the relevant Federal Court of Australia Practice Note CM7 – Expert Witness in Proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia have been read and understood and the report prepared herein is therefore compliant for use in relation to matters that may be heard by the Federal Court of Australia Subsequent research enquiries and deliberations have enabled us to report as follows: Definition & Methodology Adopted Site value is defined in the Valuation of Land Act 1971 as the: “Value of land excluding structural improvements” In accordance with the Valuation of Land Act 1971 the Valuer General currently revalues every property in South Australia on an annual basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Bundaleer Picnic Ground Saved
    Jamestown Journal email: [email protected] Circulation 1600 Vol 27. No. 2. BUNDALEER CELEBRATION: SUNDAY MARCH 25, 12 NOON Greg invites all community members to a Community Celebration at BUNDALEER PICNIC Bundaleer Picnic Ground on Sunday March 25, from 12 noon. A lunch with free entertainment will be held in the beautiful picnic ground to mark the beginning of a new era of community led manage- ment of the site. GROUND SAVED For more details, head to mybundaleer.com or the My Bundaleer Fa- Bundaleer Picnic Ground has been saved! cebook page, send an email to [email protected] or contact Greg Bos- ton 0428 641 255. The entire 22 ha recreational precinct will remain open to the public and funded by State Government. Also, a community grant of $100,000 has been awarded to Bundaleer Forest Community Areas Association to assist with building of a new visi- tor, community and event centre on site. This will be added to the $150,000 Fund My Neighbourhood project funding for that centre announced in 2017. Bundaleer Forest Community Areas Association chair Greg Boston says the Jamestown community can be very proud of its efforts in achieving this positive outcome for Bundaleer Picnic Ground. “Our amazing community has provided a united and sustained mes- sage to State Government about the social, cultural and environmental importance of the picnic ground for locals and visitors,” Greg says. “Our community has invested literally thousands of hours into saving this precious recreational gem over the past three and a half years. “I’d like to thank every person who did their bit, whether that was by commenting on the Greenways Act, voting through Fund My Neighbour- hood, creating a poster at school, taking on committee roles, or anything else.” Greg says community involvement in management of the site into the future is key to the on-going improvements at the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Register of Public Roads
    Register of Public Roads As at 12 February 2019 REGISTER OF PUBLIC ROADS CONTENTS SEALED ROADS Township Sealed Roads Rural Sealed Roads UNSEALED ROADS Township Unsealed Roads Rural Unsealed Roads SEALED ROADS – TOWNSHIP Road Name From To End Asset Type Length Width Area Acacia Street Wattle Drive Springwood Street Township Low Use Slurry Seal (Standard Pavement) Surface 361.80 7.40 2,677.30 Adelaide Square Eyre Road (Playground) Bowman Street Township (Other) Low Use Spray Seal (Standard Pavement) Upper Surface 111.30 6.00 667.80 Adelaide Square Eyre Road (SA Water) Bowman Street Township (Other) Low Use Spray Seal (Standard Pavement) Upper Surface 127.10 5.00 635.50 Adelaide Square Eyre Road (Rotunda) Bowman Street Township (Other) Low Use Spray Seal (Standard Pavement) Upper Surface 107.70 5.00 538.50 Adelaide Square Eyre Road (Church) Bowman Street Township (Other) Low Use Spray Seal (Standard Pavement) Upper Surface 125.40 5.00 627.00 Afford Road Harris Road Copinger Road South Township (Port Pirie) Medium Use Spray Seal (Standard Pavement) Upper Surface 591.20 6.50 3,842.80 Afford Road Copinger Road South Steam Train Road Township (Port Pirie) Medium Use Spray Seal (Standard Pavement) Upper Surface 579.30 6.70 3,881.30 Afford Road Victoria Street Dorothy Street Township (Port Pirie) Medium Use Spray Seal (Standard Pavement) Upper Surface 289.60 12.80 3,706.90 Afford Road Dorothy Street Harris Road Township Medium Use Hotmix Bitumen (Future SS Standard Pavement) Surface 223.40 12.80 2,859.50 Afford Road Three Chain Road Victoria Street
    [Show full text]
  • Released Under Foi
    Road and Marine Assets - Periodic and Critical Road Maintenance Program File 2018/13611/01 - Document 001 (NOTE: Contact either Senior or Asset Engineer from Road and Marine Assets to Update/Edit the Program) Financial Urban Road Common Road Start End Length Width Area Number Total Lane Treatment Project Actual Road Name Customer Description Cwy Treatment Year Rural Classification Name MM MM (km) (m) (m²) of Lanes Kms Detail Status Cost Approx 2.32 km south of Tolosa Port Augusta - Port 2016/17 Rural Rural Arterial Augusta Highway Rd to 200m south of Flinders U 78.320 83.440 5.120 10 51200 2 10.24 Spray Seal Spray Seal Completed $ 359,460.61 Wakefield Rd View Dr Port Augusta - Port 2016/17 Rural Rural Arterial Augusta Highway Georges Corner U 87.200 87.700 0.500 14 7000 2 1.00 Spray Seal Spray Seal Completed $ 38,212.71 Wakefield Rd Port Augusta - Port Section between Gervase Rd and 2016/17 Rural Rural Arterial Augusta Highway U 96.540 98.630 2.090 13.5 28215 2 4.18 Spray Seal Mod 16/7 Completed $ 153,546.15 Wakefield Rd Stock Route Rd Approx 300m south of Stock Port Augusta - Port 2016/17 Rural Rural Arterial Augusta Highway Route Rd to 400m north of U 98.630 100.330 1.700 9 15300 2 3.40 Spray Seal Mod 16/7 Completed $ 102,575.14 Wakefield Rd Church Rd Rural Port Wakefield - 2016/17 Rural Balaklava Road 1km west of Auburn Township U 52.870 54.165 1.295 7 9065 2 2.59 Spray Seal M10mm Completed $ 52,710.67 Connector Auburn Rd Coghlan Rd to Pelican Point 2016/17 Urban Urban Arterial Victoria Road Victoria Road L 0.940 2.040 1.100 9 9900
    [Show full text]
  • Second Response to Community Submissions
    Development Application Response to Verbal Submissions 10 December 2018 Contents 1. General ............................................................................................................................................ 5 1.1 Quality of application documentation .................................................................................... 5 1.2 Impact of project on adjoining zones ..................................................................................... 6 2. Design .............................................................................................................................................. 8 2.1 Confirmation of WTG dimensions ........................................................................................... 8 2.2 Height of turbines ................................................................................................................. 10 2.3 Hydrogen production facility ................................................................................................ 11 2.4 Micro-siting & detailed design .............................................................................................. 11 3. Operations .................................................................................................................................... 12 3.1 Communications interference .............................................................................................. 12 3.1.1 Radio Signal Losses (in general) ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Tourism in South Australia – Principles and Possibilities Basic Principles of Heritage Tourism Planning
    Heritage Tourism in South Australia – Principles and Possibilities Basic principles of heritage tourism planning 1. Heritage tourism works best when it enhances the experience of getting to and back from an established attraction – except the rare cases that a place functions as a standalone tourist destination such as Uluru, Sydney Opera House, Port Arthur or the Great Barrier Reef, No visitor is going to build a trip around a heritage register or categories such as commerce or prisons. Every heritage tourism route should attach itself to an attraction that has already proved itself, i.e. Hahndorf, McLaren Vale, the Barossa, Clare Valley, Kangaroo Island, the Flinders Ranges, Mount Gambier, the Coonawarra and the Naracoorte Caves. 2. People understand routes best when they tell stories about the historical forces that brought heritage places into being. Thinking about fundamental forces at work makes it easier to come up with stories about places along the way. History on its own will not sell a story or a route; it needs to be linked to what the eyes can see. For example, World War I and the Great Depression are very significant chapters in the history of South Australia but difficult to relate to visible heritage along routes that tell unfolding stories. 3. Chosen themes should reflect ongoing rather than ephemeral heritage. Few today would follow a C J Dennis or Peter Dawson trail, whereas interest would have been huge in the 1930s. 4. Heritage Tourism must embrace the possibilities opened by new technology and social media. We are fortunate to live in an era where we need not rely on roadside signage and brochures to tell stories.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey 2 Results
    SURVEY 2 RESULTS COMPLETED LOCATION ISSUE Kapunda Permit 26m B-double HML on Perry Road and East Terrace at Kapunda Lyndhurst to SA/Qld border* Permit 53.5m road trains on Strzelecki track from Lyndhurst to SA/ Qld border Marla to Lyndhurst* Permit 53.5m road trains on Oodnadatta track from Marla to Lyndhurst Marla to Oodnadatta* Permit 53.5m road trains between Marla and Oodnadatta on Oodnadatta Track Marree to Birdsville* Permit 53.5m road trains on Birdsville track from Marree to Birdsville Mundulla Permit PBS Level 2B along Rowney Road through Mundulla (missing link) Roxby Downs to William Creek* Permit 53.5m road trains on Borefield Road from Roxby Downs to William Creek IN PROGRESS LOCATION ISSUE Auburn to Bowmans* Permit 30m road trains between Auburn and Bowmans along Balaklava Road Eyre Peninsula to Murray Permit 36.5m road train HML from Eyre Peninsula (Cleve) to Murray Bridge Bridge Forestry Higher Productivity Improve HPV access for timber industry in SA Vehicle (HPV) access Lenswood Permit 26m B-double on Norton Summit Road and Lobethal Road to Lenswood. Permit 19m HML after consultation with respondent. Merriton to Wallaroo* Permit 36.5m road train along Spencer Highway between Merriton and Wallaroo via Port Broughton Rowland Flat to Lyndoch Permit 26m B-double from Rowland Flat to Lyndoch (Hermann Thumm Drive) via Barossa Valley Way and council road. Note, Altona bridge is deficient and tight road alignment Tailem Bend to Port Adelaide* Permit 36.5m road train between Tailem Bend and Port Adelaide Viterra – Crystal Brook*
    [Show full text]
  • A Modern Transport System for Agriculture - a New Partnership Approach Introduction
    A MODERN TRANSPORT SYSTEM FOR AGRICULTURE - A NEW PARTNERSHIP APPROACH INTRODUCTION Early Project Outcomes - Completed or will be completed before end June 2015 PRODUCTIVITY GAIN Approval for BAB Quad and ABB quad road train access to the 53.5-metre road train At least 8% network between the Northern Territory border and Port Augusta. Extending the maximum permitted length of a road train prime mover when operating At least 10% as a semi-trailer from 19 to 20 metres. Amending the existing SA tri-axle dolly policy to be nationally consistent. At least 6% Approval for HML heavy vehicles to access a number of Viterra grain sites. At least 14% Upgrading the road access on Carslake Road, Dublin from General Mass Limit (GML) to At least 14% High Mass Limits (HML). Increasing from 100 km to 160 km the travel radius beyond which a primary producer Up to one hour per must carry and fill out a heavy vehicle fatigue work diary. day per driver Establishing a common registration date to make it easier for a farmer to register multiple farm vehicles. 2 A Modern transport system for agriculture This report is designed to consolidate thinking around the key road transport issues facing South Australian agriculture. The Change@Sa project was initiated following in line with the State Government’s priorities and Strategic recognition by Primary Producers SA (PPSA), Primary Plan. Industries and Regions SA (PIRSA) and the Department It is proposed to communicate and discuss the report with of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure (DPTI) that a farmers, local government and freight operators.
    [Show full text]
  • Port Pirie Regional Council Rural Roads Rack Plan
    ! . ROAD TABLE ! M I RoadID Grid D B D L S L I C ABATTOIRS ROAD 1A E G E H ACROPOLIS ROAD 1B N N T A O I C C R ADEY ROAD 3B R D T AERODROME ROAD 1A O H R P I V RACK PLAN 989 O ANGEL ROAD Warnertow n E L I S ARBON ROAD 2B !. !. ! . ! FLINDERS VIEW ARDNALOUGH ROAD 3B OIR RV SE AUGUSTA HIGHWAY 1A 2B 3B RE AZILE ROAD 2B A M U G N D U BAIRSTOW CROSSING 3B O R S U I T S R V E BARKULLA ROAD 3C T T E R A BARN HILL ROAD 3B H G BARUNGA EAST ROAD 3B E M BEHENNAS TRACK 3C L I N L !. !. Port Pirie Regional Council !. A I H Napperby BICENTENARY ROAD 3B Y . B !. ! . A ! S BIMBERDEAN ROAD 3B H OAK W G IE S O F V L R L T BINNEY ROAD 2B E L GU AS O E . ! N I D V OA V !. !. R BLIGHT ROAD 1B E E BLOCK F ROAD 3B W VIE SENTOSA . ! F BOUNDARY FIRETRACK 3B UL D COOMBE G OA R J BOUNDARY ROAD Port Pirie E ! . !. !. ! R . R B ! E I BOWMAN PARK ROAD 2B U Rural Roads C C N N E H !. BOWMAN STREET EXTENSION Crystal Brook G RIC P O HISTO S A BROOK PARK LANE 2B M !. C I E A GUM N V BROOKLYN ROAD 3B I N E R . ! . ! !. R O C E E BRYSONS ROAD 3B D R T V S W I .
    [Show full text]
  • Access Network Changes – Additional Routes for July 2019
    July 2019 Access network changes – Additional routes for July 2019 This fact sheet contains a summary of additional routes added to heavy vehicle networks for July 2019 that did not require a gazettal notice. These changes once approved by the NHVR, were automatically updated on the NHVR Journey Planner and relevant road transport authority map. A monthly summary of the updates to heavy vehicle networks that occur directly on state road transport authority mapping sites (without any gazettal notice) can be found at www.nhvr.gov.au/access-network-changes Ref State Road manager Change Description 125924 QLD Banana Shire Add route to the following networks: Shepherdsons Road, Dakenba Council 23m B Double (from Jambin Dakenbah Rd to 25/26m B Double Dawson Highway) Type 1 Road Train 126119 VIC Swan Hill Rural Add route to the following networks: Karinie Street, Swan Hill (from City Council 25/26m B-double Garden Road to Bish Road) Victorian Grain Harvest Management Scheme B Doubles Victorian Grain Harvest Management Scheme Rigid Truck/Semi trailer 126117 VIC Greater Add route to the following networks: Strickland Road, East Bendigo Bendigo City 25/26m B Double (from Halpin Street to Charleston Council PBS Level 2A Road) HML Charleston Road, East Bendigo Victorian Grain Harvest (from Strickland Road to Nolan Management Scheme B Doubles Street) Murphy Street, East Bendigo (from Strickland Road to Empire Rubber Service Road) 126112 VIC Greater Add route to the following networks: Parsons Avenue, Springvale (from Dandenong 25/26m B Double Regal
    [Show full text]
  • Development Application Response to Submissions
    Development Application Response to Submissions Contents Chapter 1 – Public Submissions .................................................................................................... 3 Distribution of submissions & response methodology ....................................................................... 3 1. Visual Impact ........................................................................................................................... 4 2. Proximity to Town ................................................................................................................. 10 3. Property Values ..................................................................................................................... 11 4. Noise ...................................................................................................................................... 14 5. Telecommunications Interference ........................................................................................ 16 6. Health Concerns .................................................................................................................... 17 7. Tourism Impact ...................................................................................................................... 18 8. Flora and Fauna ..................................................................................................................... 19 9. Lack of Consultation .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]