Progress in Developing Pharmacologic Agents to Treat Bulimia Nervosa

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Progress in Developing Pharmacologic Agents to Treat Bulimia Nervosa CNS Drugs (2019) 33:31–46 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-018-0594-5 REVIEW ARTICLE Progress in Developing Pharmacologic Agents to Treat Bulimia Nervosa Susan L. McElroy1,2 · Anna I. Guerdjikova1,2 · Nicole Mori1 · Francisco Romo‑Nava1,2 Published online: 6 December 2018 © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018 Abstract This paper reviews past and current progress in developing pharmacologic agents for the treatment of individuals with bulimia nervosa (BN). We searched the literature and clinical trial registries for compounds studied in BN, the related condition, binge eating disorder (BED), and preclinical models of binge-eating behavior. Drug classes evaluated included antidepressants, antiepileptic drugs, stimulants and other medications for attention-defcit/hyperactivity disorder, opioid antagonists, and weight loss agents, among others. The only available drugs with established efcacy in BN at this time include antidepres- sants (especially selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs]) and the antiepileptic topiramate, though the efcacy of these compounds is modest at best. The only medications we found currently receiving empirical study in people with BN were fuoxetine, other serotonergic antidepressants, intranasal naloxone, lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, phentermine–topiramate combination, the antiandrogenic oral contraceptive ethinyl estradiol plus drospirenone, and prazosin. Preclinical models sug- gest that nociceptin receptor antagonists, the selective serotonin 5-HT2C receptor agonist lorcaserin, monoamine stabilizers, and selective orexin-1 receptor antagonists might be helpful. We found no evidence of a drug developed specifcally for the treatment of individuals with BN. Future areas for research in the pharmacotherapy of BN are suggested. Importantly, until drugs are developed specifcally for eating disorders, drugs developed for other conditions that are centrally acting and associ- ated with benefcial psychotropic efects and/or reduced appetite or weight loss might be considered for repurposing in BN. 1 Introduction Key Points Bulimia nervosa (BN), characterized by recurrent binge- Empirical study into the pharmacologic treatment of eating episodes and regular inappropriate compensatory bulimia nervosa (BN) has substantially lagged behind weight loss behaviors, is an important public health problem. that into other serious mental disorders. Indeed, only It is present in approximately 1.0% of the general world- one drug (the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor wide adult population as a lifetime diagnosis and 0.4% as a fuoxetine) has regulatory approval for the treatment of 12-month diagnosis [1]. Among adolescents from the USA, individuals with BN. the lifetime prevalence estimate of BN is 0.9% [2]. BN is Few studies of pharmacologic agents in individuals with more common in females than males, with 1.5% of adult BN are presently ongoing. women [3] and 1.3% of adolescent females [2] from the USA experiencing BN during their lifetime. Median age of onset Pharmacotherapy agents with efcacy in other condi- of BN is late teens to early 20s in adults [1] and 12.4 years tions characterized by binge eating (e.g., binge eating in adolescents [2]. Though a substantial proportion of indi- disorder [BED]) or hyperphagia (e.g., Prader–Willi viduals with BN recover over the long term, the disorder is syndrome) should be considered for evaluation in BN, recurrent or chronic in others [4–6]. though assessment of safety will be crucial. BN is associated with substantial psychiatric and medi- cal comorbidity, including mood, anxiety, substance use, * Susan L. McElroy and attention-defcit/hyperactivity (ADHD) disorders, sui- [email protected] cidality and self-injurious behavior, dental complications, electrolyte abnormalities, obesity, and increased mortal- 1 Lindner Center of HOPE, Mason, OH, USA ity [1, 3, 7]. BN is further associated with impairment in 2 University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA Vol.:(0123456789) 32 S. L. McElroy et al. role functioning, reduced health-related quality of life, and ongoing in France to evaluate the efcacy of SSRIs in 45 increased healthcare utilization and costs [1, 3, 8]. participants with BN according to brain serotonin profle Though psychotherapy is viewed by many to be the as determined by positive emission tomography using the treatment of choice for BN [9, 10], patients with BN often specifc brain serotonin 5-HT1A receptor ligand [18F]MPPF receive pharmacotherapy [11]. However, only one drug, the (NCT02359513). selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) fuoxetine, has Other antidepressants beyond fuoxetine have been shown regulatory approval for the treatment of BN (in the USA to be superior to placebo for reducing the frequency of both and other countries). Moreover, no drug has been devel- binge-eating and purging episodes in BN [19, 20], and oped specifcally for the treatment of an eating disorder, guidelines have concluded that antidepressants are efca- which may refect in part the limited knowledge about the cious for BN [9, 21]. This includes SSRIs other than fuox- pathophysiology and molecular genetics of these disorders etine, tricyclic antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibi- [12–14]. New medications with novel mechanisms of action tors, and atypical agents such as mianserin, trazodone, and are sorely needed for the treatment of individuals with BN. bupropion. A 2003 meta-analysis of 19 antidepressant RCTs We review past and ongoing research with specifc medi- in people with BN showed antidepressants were modestly cations or medication classes in treating individuals with superior to placebo for stopping binge-eating episodes [22]. BN. We searched PubMed and clinical trial registries to This meta-analysis showed antidepressants were also safe for identify medications evaluated in BN. Because we found so treatment of BN, with the important exception of bupropion. few, we also searched PubMed and clinical trial registries to Though efcacious for reducing binge eating and purging, identify drugs evaluated in patients with binge-eating dis- this agent was associated with an increased risk of seizures order (BED). Although BED is a diagnostic entity distinct [23] and is therefore contraindicated for the treatment of BN from BN, it is also characterized by recurrent binge-eating (and anorexia nervosa). episodes as a core feature, the binge-eating episodes for both To our knowledge, three randomized, placebo-controlled, disorders are similarly defned in modern nosologic systems relapse-prevention trials have been undertaken with antide- [15, 16], and there is substantial diagnostic shift between pressants in BN. In the frst RCT, though desipramine was the two disorders [4]. Although not yet defnitively proven, superior to placebo for reducing binge eating in the initial a drug that reduces binge eating in BED might also reduce acute phase of the study, not enough patients completed binge eating in BN. Finally, we also searched PubMed for the maintenance phase to determine whether the drug also drugs evaluated in preclinical models of binge eating, though had long-term efcacy [24]. In the second RCT, 72 patients whether fndings from these models generalize to individuals with BN successfully treated with intensive inpatient psy- with BN remains unclear [17]. chotherapy were randomized to receive fuvoxamine (n = 33) This search found a broad array of drugs evaluated in the or placebo (n = 39) as outpatients for 12 weeks [25]. Fluvox- treatment of BN and related conditions, including antide- amine was begun 3 weeks before hospital discharge, for a pressants, antiepileptic drugs, stimulants and other ADHD total of 15 weeks of treatment. Relapse rate was signifcantly medications, agents with hormonal properties, and weight lower with fuvoxamine than placebo, as evidenced by (1) loss drugs, among others. We summarize these data and sug- 10 versus 46% deterioration on the Psychiatric Status Rating gest future areas for research. Scale for Bulimia Nervosa; (2) 111 versus 270% increase in self-reported binge-eating episodes in the last week, and (3) 50 versus 175% increase on the Structured Interview for 2 Antidepressants Anorexia and Bulimia Nervosa subscale of bulimic behavior. In addition, at the end of the relapse prevention, signifcantly As noted, the SSRI antidepressant fuoxetine is the only more patients in the fuvoxamine group than the placebo medication with regulatory approval (in the USA and other group reported no binge-eating episodes in the past week countries) for the treatment of BN. In the largest randomized (p < 0.05). However, the dropout rate was high (33%), with controlled trial (RCT) of fuoxetine in BN, 387 women 14 (38%) fuvoxamine recipients and fve (14%) placebo with BN were randomized to receive fuoxetine 60 mg/ recipients stopping treatment prematurely. day, fuoxetine 20 mg/day, or placebo for 8 weeks at 13 In the third study, 232 outpatients with purging-type BN sites [18]. Fluoxetine 60 mg/day was superior to placebo received single-blind treatment with fuoxetine 60 mg/day for reducing binge-eating and vomiting episodes, whereas for 8 weeks; 150 (65%) met response criteria and were ran- fuoxetine 20 mg/day had an intermediate efect [18]. Fluox- domly assigned to continue fuoxetine 60 mg/day (n = 76) etine 60 mg/day was also superior to placebo for reducing or switch to placebo (n = 74) for 52 weeks [26]. Fluoxetine- depression, carbohydrate craving, and pathological eating treated participants had a signifcantly
Recommended publications
  • Obesity with Comorbid Eating Disorders: Associated Health Risks and Treatment Approaches
    nutrients Commentary Obesity with Comorbid Eating Disorders: Associated Health Risks and Treatment Approaches Felipe Q. da Luz 1,2,3,* ID , Phillipa Hay 4 ID , Stephen Touyz 2 and Amanda Sainsbury 1,2 ID 1 The Boden Institute of Obesity, Nutrition, Exercise & Eating Disorders, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia; [email protected] 2 Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, the University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia; [email protected] 3 CAPES Foundation, Ministry of Education of Brazil, Brasília, DF 70040-020, Brazil 4 Translational Health Research Institute (THRI), School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-02-8627-1961 Received: 11 May 2018; Accepted: 25 June 2018; Published: 27 June 2018 Abstract: Obesity and eating disorders are each associated with severe physical and mental health consequences, and individuals with obesity as well as comorbid eating disorders are at higher risk of these than individuals with either condition alone. Moreover, obesity can contribute to eating disorder behaviors and vice-versa. Here, we comment on the health complications and treatment options for individuals with obesity and comorbid eating disorder behaviors. It appears that in order to improve the healthcare provided to these individuals, there is a need for greater exchange of experiences and specialized knowledge between healthcare professionals working in the obesity field with those working in the field of eating disorders, and vice-versa. Additionally, nutritional and/or behavioral interventions simultaneously addressing weight management and reduction of eating disorder behaviors in individuals with obesity and comorbid eating disorders may be required.
    [Show full text]
  • (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub
    US 20130289061A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/0289061 A1 Bhide et al. (43) Pub. Date: Oct. 31, 2013 (54) METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS TO Publication Classi?cation PREVENT ADDICTION (51) Int. Cl. (71) Applicant: The General Hospital Corporation, A61K 31/485 (2006-01) Boston’ MA (Us) A61K 31/4458 (2006.01) (52) U.S. Cl. (72) Inventors: Pradeep G. Bhide; Peabody, MA (US); CPC """"" " A61K31/485 (201301); ‘4161223011? Jmm‘“ Zhu’ Ansm’ MA. (Us); USPC ......... .. 514/282; 514/317; 514/654; 514/618; Thomas J. Spencer; Carhsle; MA (US); 514/279 Joseph Biederman; Brookline; MA (Us) (57) ABSTRACT Disclosed herein is a method of reducing or preventing the development of aversion to a CNS stimulant in a subject (21) App1_ NO_; 13/924,815 comprising; administering a therapeutic amount of the neu rological stimulant and administering an antagonist of the kappa opioid receptor; to thereby reduce or prevent the devel - . opment of aversion to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Also (22) Flled' Jun‘ 24’ 2013 disclosed is a method of reducing or preventing the develop ment of addiction to a CNS stimulant in a subj ect; comprising; _ _ administering the CNS stimulant and administering a mu Related U‘s‘ Apphcatlon Data opioid receptor antagonist to thereby reduce or prevent the (63) Continuation of application NO 13/389,959, ?led on development of addiction to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Apt 27’ 2012’ ?led as application NO_ PCT/US2010/ Also disclosed are pharmaceutical compositions comprising 045486 on Aug' 13 2010' a central nervous system stimulant and an opioid receptor ’ antagonist.
    [Show full text]
  • Eating Disorders: About More Than Food
    Eating Disorders: About More Than Food Has your urge to eat less or more food spiraled out of control? Are you overly concerned about your outward appearance? If so, you may have an eating disorder. National Institute of Mental Health What are eating disorders? Eating disorders are serious medical illnesses marked by severe disturbances to a person’s eating behaviors. Obsessions with food, body weight, and shape may be signs of an eating disorder. These disorders can affect a person’s physical and mental health; in some cases, they can be life-threatening. But eating disorders can be treated. Learning more about them can help you spot the warning signs and seek treatment early. Remember: Eating disorders are not a lifestyle choice. They are biologically-influenced medical illnesses. Who is at risk for eating disorders? Eating disorders can affect people of all ages, racial/ethnic backgrounds, body weights, and genders. Although eating disorders often appear during the teen years or young adulthood, they may also develop during childhood or later in life (40 years and older). Remember: People with eating disorders may appear healthy, yet be extremely ill. The exact cause of eating disorders is not fully understood, but research suggests a combination of genetic, biological, behavioral, psychological, and social factors can raise a person’s risk. What are the common types of eating disorders? Common eating disorders include anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge-eating disorder. If you or someone you know experiences the symptoms listed below, it could be a sign of an eating disorder—call a health provider right away for help.
    [Show full text]
  • Joel L. Young, M.D
    Joel L. Young, M.D. 441 South Livernois Road, Suite 100 Rochester Hills, Michigan 48307 Phone: 248-608-8800 / Fax: 248-608-2490 / E-mail: [email protected] Professional History 2000 – Present: Chief Medical Officer and Founder, Clinical Trials Group at the Rochester Center for Behavioral Medicine, Rochester Hills, MI 1993 – Present: Medical Director and Founder, Rochester Center for Behavioral Medicine, Rochester Hills, MI (www.rcbm.net). 2008 (Current): Clinical Associate Professor of Psychiatry, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI. 2000 – 2007: Medical Director, Crittenton Network for Behavioral Health, Rochester, MI. 2000 – 2002: Chief of Staff, Department of Psychiatry, Crittenton Hospital, Rochester, MI. July, 1993 – 1997: Medical Director, Psychiatric Emergency Services, Crittenton Hospital. July, 1992 – June, 1993: Chief Resident of Adult Services, Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor, MI. Oct. 1991-Sept. 1993: Unit Psychiatrist, Bon Secours Adolescent Mental Health Unit, Grosse Pointe, MI. August, 1991 – 1996: Consulting Psychiatrist, Beacon Hill Clinic, Birmingham, MI. July, 1991 – June, 1992: Consulting Psychiatrist, Washtenaw County Community Mental Health Services, Ann Arbor, MI. July, 1990 – June, 1992: House Officer, Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Hospitals. June, 1989 – June, 1990: Intern, Departments of Internal Medicine, Pediatrics and Psychiatry, University of Michigan Hospitals. Boards 2018 Fellow: American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology 2017 Re-certification of Geriatric Qualifications by the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology through 2027. 2017 Re-certification of Forensic Qualifications by the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology through 2027 2014 Re-Certification by the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology 2007 Re-certification by the American Board of Adolescent Psychiatry.
    [Show full text]
  • Supported by an Educational Grant from Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. Faculty
    Supported by an educational grant from Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. Faculty Leslie Citrome, MD, MPH C. Brendan Montano, MD Clinical Professor of Psychiatry and CT Clinical Research Behavioral Sciences Director, Principal Investigator New York Medical College Private Practice, Internal Medicine Valhalla, New York Cromwell, Connecticut Faculty Disclosure • Dr. Citrome: Consultant—Acadia, Alkermes, Allergan, Intra-Cellular Therapeutics, Janssen, Lundbeck, Merck, Neurocrine, Noven, Osmotica, Otsuka, Pfizer, Shire, Sunovion, Takeda, Teva, Vanda; Royalties—Springer Healthcare (book), UpToDate (reviewer), Wiley (Editor in Chief, International Journal of Clinical Practice); Shareholder (and spouse)—Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, J & J, Merck, Pfizer; Speaker—Acadia, Alkermes, Allergan, Janssen, Lundbeck, Merck, Neurocrine, Otsuka, Pfizer, Shire, Sunovion, Takeda, Teva. • Dr. Montano: Consultant—Allergan, Shire/Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd., Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Arbor Pharmaceuticals Ltd.; Research Support—Allergan, Avanir, Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tonix, BioHaven, Axsome Therapeutics, Arbor Pharmaceuticals Ltd.; Speakers Bureau— Allergan, Shire/Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd., Arbor Pharmaceutical Ltd. Disclosure • The faculty have been informed of their responsibility to disclose to the audience if they will be discussing off-label or investigational use(s) of drugs, products, and/or devices (any use not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration). – The off-label and investigational use of antidepressants, topiramate,
    [Show full text]
  • Horizon Scanning Status Report June 2019
    Statement of Funding and Purpose This report incorporates data collected during implementation of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Health Care Horizon Scanning System, operated by ECRI Institute under contract to PCORI, Washington, DC (Contract No. MSA-HORIZSCAN-ECRI-ENG- 2018.7.12). The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the authors, who are responsible for its content. No statement in this report should be construed as an official position of PCORI. An intervention that potentially meets inclusion criteria might not appear in this report simply because the horizon scanning system has not yet detected it or it does not yet meet inclusion criteria outlined in the PCORI Health Care Horizon Scanning System: Horizon Scanning Protocol and Operations Manual. Inclusion or absence of interventions in the horizon scanning reports will change over time as new information is collected; therefore, inclusion or absence should not be construed as either an endorsement or rejection of specific interventions. A representative from PCORI served as a contracting officer’s technical representative and provided input during the implementation of the horizon scanning system. PCORI does not directly participate in horizon scanning or assessing leads or topics and did not provide opinions regarding potential impact of interventions. Financial Disclosure Statement None of the individuals compiling this information have any affiliations or financial involvement that conflicts with the material presented in this report. Public Domain Notice This document is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without special permission. Citation of the source is appreciated. All statements, findings, and conclusions in this publication are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) or its Board of Governors.
    [Show full text]
  • Treating Binge-Eating Disorder. a Review of Evidence for Adults
    Treating Binge-Eating Disorder A Review of the Research for Adults e Is This Information Right for Me? This information is right for you if: Your health care professional* said you have binge-eating disorder (BED). You are age 18 or older. The information in this summary is from research on adults. What will this summary tell me? This summary will answer these questions: What is BED? How is BED treated? » Talk therapy (talking with a trained therapist) » Medicines What have researchers found about how well talk therapy and medicines work to treat BED? What are possible side effects of medicines to treat BED? What should I discuss with my health care professional? * Your health care professional may include your primary care physician, nurse practitioner, physician assistant, psychiatrist, psychologist, licensed social worker-counselor, nutritionist, or dietitian. Where does the information come from? Researchers funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, a Federal Government research agency, reviewed studies on treatments for binge-eating disorder published through January 2015. The report included 57 studies and one systematic review and was reviewed by health care professionals, researchers, experts, and the public. You can read the report at www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ binge-eating-disorder. 1 Understanding Your Condition What is binge-eating disorder? Binge-eating disorder (BED) is a Note: Unlike people condition in which a person often eats with some other eating a much larger amount of food at one disorders, people with time than is normal. The person feels BED generally do not out of control while binge eating.
    [Show full text]
  • Stimulant and Related Medications: US Food and Drug
    Stimulant and Related Medications: U.S. Food and Drug Administration-Approved Indications and Dosages for Use in Adults The therapeutic dosing recommendations for stimulant and related medications are based on U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved product labeling. Nevertheless, the dosing regimen is adjusted according to a patient’s individual response to pharmacotherapy. The FDA-approved dosages and indications for the use of stimulant and related medications in adults are provided in this table. All medication doses listed are for oral administration. Information on the generic availability of the stimulant and related medications can be found by searching the Electronic Orange Book at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/ob/default.cfm on the FDA website. Generic Medication Indication Dosing Information Other Information Availability amphetamine/dextroamphetamine ADHD Initial dose: May increase daily dose by 5 mg at Yes mixed salts[1] 5 mg once or twice a day; weekly intervals until optimal response Maximum dose: 40 mg per day is achieved. Only in rare cases will it be necessary to exceed a total of 40 mg per day. amphetamine/dextroamphetamine narcolepsy Initial dose: 10 mg per day; May increase daily dose by 10 mg at Yes mixed salts Usual dose: weekly intervals until optimal response 5 mg to 60 mg per day is achieved. Take first dose in divided doses upon awakening. amphetamine/dextroamphetamine ADHD Recommended dose: Patients switching from regular-release Yes mixed salts ER*[2] 20 mg once a day amphetamine/dextroamphetamine mixed salts may take the same total daily dose once a day. armodafinil[3] narcolepsy Recommended dose: Take as a single dose in the morning.
    [Show full text]
  • Dsm-5 Diagnostic Criteria for Eating Disorders Anorexia Nervosa
    DSM-5 DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA FOR EATING DISORDERS ANOREXIA NERVOSA DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA To be diagnosed with anorexia nervosa according to the DSM-5, the following criteria must be met: 1. Restriction of energy intaKe relative to requirements leading to a significantly low body weight in the context of age, sex, developmental trajectory, and physical health. 2. Intense fear of gaining weight or becoming fat, even though underweight. 3. Disturbance in the way in which one's body weight or shape is experienced, undue influence of body weight or shape on self-evaluation, or denial of the seriousness of the current low body weight. Even if all the DSM-5 criteria for anorexia are not met, a serious eating disorder can still be present. Atypical anorexia includes those individuals who meet the criteria for anorexia but who are not underweight despite significant weight loss. Research studies have not found a difference in the medical and psychological impacts of anorexia and atypical anorexia. BULIMIA NERVOSA DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA According to the DSM-5, the official diagnostic criteria for bulimia nervosa are: • Recurrent episodes of binge eating. An episode of binge eating is characterized by both of the following: o Eating, in a discrete period of time (e.g. within any 2-hour period), an amount of food that is definitely larger than most people would eat during a similar period of time and under similar circumstances. o A sense of lacK of control over eating during the episode (e.g. a feeling that one cannot stop eating or control what or how much one is eating).
    [Show full text]
  • Established Aggregate Production Quotas for Schedule I and II
    59980 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 190 / Monday, October 1, 2012 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE for Schedule I and II Controlled information, DEA has determined that Substances and Proposed Assessment of adjustments to the proposed aggregate Drug Enforcement Administration Annual Needs for the List I Chemicals production quotas and assessment of [Docket No. DEA–365] Ephedrine, Pseudoephedrine, and annual needs for 3,4-methylenedioxy-N- Phenylpropanolamine for 2013,’’ was methylcathinone (methylone), Established Aggregate Production published in the Federal Register (77 3,4,methylenedioxypyrovalerone Quotas for Schedule I and II Controlled FR 46519). That notice proposed the (MDPV), 4-methyl-N-methylcathinone Substances and Established 2013 aggregate production quotas for (mephedrone), N-benzylpiperazine, Assessment of Annual Needs for the each basic class of controlled substance amphetamine (for conversion), List I Chemicals Ephedrine, listed in schedules I and II and the 2013 amphetamine (for sale), hydrocodone Pseudoephedrine, and assessment of annual needs for the list (for sale), hydromorphone, Phenylpropanolamine for 2013 I chemicals ephedrine, lisdexamfetamine, methylphenidate, pseudoephedrine, and morphine (for sale), oxycodone (for AGENCY: Drug Enforcement phenylpropanolamine. All interested sale), oxymorphone (for conversion), Administration (DEA), Department of persons were invited to comment on or remifentanil, sufentanil, tapentadol, Justice. object to the proposed aggregate ephedrine (for conversion), ephedrine ACTION:
    [Show full text]
  • A Dose-Escalating, Phase-2 Study of Oral Lisdexamfetamine
    Ezard et al. BMC Psychiatry (2016) 16:428 DOI 10.1186/s12888-016-1141-x STUDY PROTOCOL Open Access Study protocol: a dose-escalating, phase-2 study of oral lisdexamfetamine in adults with methamphetamine dependence Nadine Ezard1,2, Adrian Dunlop3, Brendan Clifford1* , Raimondo Bruno4, Andrew Carr5, Alexandra Bissaker1 and Nicholas Lintzeris6,7 Abstract Background: The treatment of methamphetamine dependence is a continuing global health problem. Agonist type pharmacotherapies have been used successfully to treat opioid and nicotine dependence and are being studied for the treatment of methamphetamine dependence. One potential candidate is lisdexamfetamine, a pro-drug for dexamphetamine, which has a longer lasting therapeutic action with a lowered abuse potential. The purpose of this study is to determine the safety of lisdexamfetamine in this population at doses higher than those currently approved for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or binge eating disorder. Methods/design: This is a phase 2 dose escalation study of lisdexamfetamine for the treatment of methamphetamine dependence. Twenty individuals seeking treatment for methamphetamine dependence will be recruited at two Australian drug and alcohol services. All participants will undergo a single-blinded ascending-descending dose regime of 100 to 250 mg lisdexamfetamine, dispensed daily on site, over an 8-week period. Participants will be offered counselling as standard care. For the primary objectives the outcome variables will be adverse events monitoring, drug tolerability and regimen completion. Secondary outcomes will be changes in methamphetamine use, craving, withdrawal, severity of dependence, risk behaviour and other substance use. Medication acceptability, potential for non-prescription use, adherence and changes in neurocognition will also be measured.
    [Show full text]
  • Product Monograph
    PRODUCT MONOGRAPH VYVANSE®* lisdexamfetamine dimesylate Capsules: 10 mg, 20 mg, 30 mg, 40 mg, 50 mg, 60 mg and 70 mg Chewable Tablets: 10 mg, 20 mg, 30 mg, 40 mg, 50 mg and 60 mg Central Nervous System Stimulant Takeda Canada Inc. Date of Preparation: 22 Adelaide Street West, Suite 3800 19 February 2009 Toronto, Ontario M5H 4E3 Date of Revision: July 21, 2020 Submission Control No.: 240669 *VYVANSE® and the VYVANSE Logo are registered trademarks of Shire LLC, a Takeda company. Takeda and the Takeda Logo are trademarks of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, used under license. © 2020 Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. All rights reserved. Pa ge 1 of 60 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I: HEALTH PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION .................................................... 3 SUMMARY PRODUCT INFORMATION ................................................................... 3 INDICATIONS AND CLINICAL USE ........................................................................ 3 CONTRAINDICATIONS ............................................................................................ 5 WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS ............................................................................ 6 ADVERSE REACTIONS........................................................................................... 12 DRUG INTERACTIONS ........................................................................................... 23 DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION ........................................................................ 25 OVERDOSAGE .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]