Iso/Iec Jtc 1/Sc 2 N 4233 Date: 2012-06-26
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 2 N 4233 DATE: 2012-06-26 ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 2 Coded Character Sets Secretariat: Japan (JISC) DOC. TYPE Summary of Voting/Table of Replies Summary of Voting on SC 2 N 4228, ISO/IEC 10646: 2012/PDAM 2, Information technology -- Universal Coded Character Set (UCS) -- TITLE AMENDMENT 2: Caucasian Albanian, Psalter Pahlavi, Old Hungarian, Mahajani, Grantha, Modi, Pahawh Hmong, Mende, and other characters SOURCE SC 2 Secretariat PROJECT JTC 1.02.10646.00.02.00.03 This document is forwarded to WG 2 for resolution of comments. STATUS WG 2 is requested to prepare a disposition of comments report, revised text, a recommendation for further processing. ACTION ID FYI DUE DATE P, O and L Members of ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 2 ; ISO/IEC JTC 1 DISTRIBUTION Secretariat; ISO/IEC ITTF ACCESS LEVEL Def ISSUE NO. 402 NAME 02n4223.pdf SIZE FILE (KB) 29 PAGES Secretariat ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 2 - IPSJ/ITSCJ (Information Processing Society of Japan/Information Technology Standards Commission of Japan)* Room 308-3, Kikai-Shinko-Kaikan Bldg., 3-5-8, Shiba-Koen, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-0011 Japan *Standard Organization Accredited by JISC Telephone: +81-3-3431-2808; Facsimile: +81-3-3431-6493; E-mail: [email protected] Result of voting Ballot Information Ballot reference SC2N4228 Ballot type CIB Ballot title ISO/IEC 10646: 2012/PDAM 2, Information technology -- Universal Coded Character Set (UCS) -- AMENDMENT 2: Caucasian Albanian, Psalter Pahlavi, Old Hungarian, Mahajani, Grantha, Modi, Pahawh Hmong, Mende, and other characters Opening date 2012-03-23 Closing date 2012-06-23 Note Member responses: Votes cast (24) Canada (SCC) China (SAC) Egypt (EOS) Finland (SFS) Germany (DIN) Hungary (MSZT) Iceland (IST) India (BIS) Indonesia (BSN) Ireland (NSAI) Japan (JISC) Korea, Republic of (KATS) Lithuania (LST) Norway (SN) Poland (PKN) Romania (ASRO) Russian Federation (GOST R) Serbia (ISS) Sri Lanka (SLSI) Sweden (SIS) Thailand (TISI) Ukraine (DSSU) United Kingdom (BSI) United States (ANSI) Comments submitted (1) Italy (UNI) Votes not cast (6) Austria (ASI) France (AFNOR) Greece (ELOT) Korea, Democratic People's Republic of (CSK) Mongolia (MASM) Tunisia (INNORPI) Questions: Q.1 "Do you agree with approval of the PDAM Text?" Q.2 "If you disappove the draft, would you please indicate if you accept to change your vote to Approval if the reasons and appropriate changes will be accepted?" Votes by members Q.1 Q.2 Canada (SCC) Approval as Ignore presented China (SAC) Approval as Ignore presented Egypt (EOS) Approval with Ignore comments Finland (SFS) Abstention Ignore Germany (DIN) Approval as Ignore presented Hungary (MSZT) Abstention Ignore Iceland (IST) Approval as Ignore presented India (BIS) Abstention Ignore Indonesia (BSN) Disapproval of Yes the draft Ireland (NSAI) Disapproval of Yes the draft Japan (JISC) Disapproval of Yes the draft Korea, Republic of Approval as Ignore (KATS) presented Lithuania (LST) Approval as Ignore presented Norway (SN) Approval as Ignore presented Poland (PKN) Approval as Ignore presented Romania (ASRO) Abstention Ignore Russian Federation Approval as Ignore (GOST R) presented Serbia (ISS) Abstention Ignore Sri Lanka (SLSI) Approval with Yes comments Sweden (SIS) Abstention Ignore Thailand (TISI) Approval as Ignore presented Ukraine (DSSU) Abstention Ignore United Kingdom (BSI) Approval as Ignore presented United States (ANSI) Disapproval of Yes the draft Answers to Q.1: "Do you agree with approval of the PDAM Text?" 11 x Approval as Canada (SCC) presented China (SAC) Germany (DIN) Iceland (IST) Korea, Republic of (KATS) Lithuania (LST) Norway (SN) Poland (PKN) Russian Federation (GOST R) Thailand (TISI) United Kingdom (BSI) 2 x Approval with Egypt (EOS) comments Sri Lanka (SLSI) 4 x Disapproval of the Indonesia (BSN) draft Ireland (NSAI) Japan (JISC) United States (ANSI) 7 x Abstention Finland (SFS) Hungary (MSZT) India (BIS) Romania (ASRO) Serbia (ISS) Sweden (SIS) Ukraine (DSSU) Answers to Q.2: "If you disappove the draft, would you please indicate if you accept to change your vote to Approval if the reasons and appropriate changes will be accepted?" 5 x Yes Indonesia (BSN) Ireland (NSAI) Japan (JISC) Sri Lanka (SLSI) United States (ANSI) 0 x No 19 x Ignore Canada (SCC) China (SAC) Egypt (EOS) Finland (SFS) Germany (DIN) Hungary (MSZT) Iceland (IST) India (BIS) Korea, Republic of (KATS) Lithuania (LST) Norway (SN) Poland (PKN) Romania (ASRO) Russian Federation (GOST R) Serbia (ISS) Sweden (SIS) Thailand (TISI) Ukraine (DSSU) United Kingdom (BSI) Comments from Voters Member: Comment: Date: Egypt (EOS) Comment 2012-06-05 14:20:52 EOS has reviewed characters that are related to Arabic Language Only. Hungary (MSZT) Comment File 2012-06-19 13:53:26 CommentFiles/SC2N4228_MSZT.doc Indonesia (BSN) Comment 2012-06-22 09:02:52 if reasons and changes are accepted, we accept to change to Approval. Indonesia (BSN) Comment File 2012-06-22 09:02:52 CommentFiles/SC2N4228_BSN.doc Ireland (NSAI) Comment 2012-06-22 15:28:13 Comments sent directly to the secretary Japan (JISC) Comment File 2012-06-22 18:37:34 CommentFiles/SC2N4228_JISC.doc Sri Lanka (SLSI) Comment 2012-06-22 19:07:29 Sri Lanka has come to know that Hungary has a serious concern on the Draft. Hence, Sri Lanka suggests to give a hearing on their concerns. United States (ANSI) Comment File 2012-06-18 21:36:32 CommentFiles/SC2N4228_ANSI.doc Comments from Commenters Member: Comment: Date: Italy (UNI) Comment 2012-06-18 09:22:30 Abstention Template for comments and secretariat observations Date: 2012-06-19 Document: ISO/IEC/JTC1/SC2 - 02n4228_ISO/IEC 10646:2012/Amd.2:2012 1 2 (3) 4 5 (6) (7) MB1 Clause No./ Paragraph/ Type Comment (justification for change) by the MB Proposed change by the MB Secretariat observations Subclause No./ Figure/Table/ of on each comment submitted Annex Note com- (e.g. 3.1) (e.g. Table 1) ment2 HU ge By now interested parties have not been able to reach a consensus on negotiating the Proposed Draft Amendment (PDAM) 2 - ISO/IEC 10646:2012/Amd.2:2012 in competent Hungarian national standardization technical committee. Among the interested parties are two substantially different position on the draft. One of them supports „Yes”, and the other one supports „No”. The intention of the Hungarian National Body (Hungarian Standards Institution - MSZT) does not prevent a standardisation of the Universal Coded Character Set, so the possible official vote of Hungarian National Body can only be Abstention. Any document that contains a different opinion on the ISO/IEC 10646:2012/Amd.2:2012 does not represent the official Hungarian national position. 1 MB = Member body (enter the ISO 3166 two-letter country code, e.g. CN for China; comments from the ISO/CS editing unit are identified by **) 2 Type of comment: ge = general te = technical ed = editorial NOTE Columns 1, 2, 4, 5 are compulsory. page 1 of 1 ISO electronic balloting commenting template/version 2001-10 Template for comments and secretariat observations Date: 2012-06-22 Document: ISO/IEC 10646:2012/PDAM 2 1 2 (3) 4 5 (6) (7) MB1 Clause No./ Paragraph/ Type Comment (justification for change) by the MB Proposed change by the MB Secretariat observations Subclause No./ Figure/Table/ of on each comment submitted Annex Note com- (e.g. 3.1) (e.g. Table 1) ment2 ID Ge Based on two previous documents, N4183 and N4274, in We suggest the Hungarian experts to negotiate to comparison to the current draft, there are several points reach consensus. It may take more time before the to be resolved : publication, however it is better for having stable character codes than revising later. 1. The name of the script, whether “Old Hungarian” or “Rovas” as suggested by the Rovas Work Group of the Hungarian Standards Institution 2. The design of the glyphs 3. The order of the characters 4. The completeness of the character set 1 MB = Member body (enter the ISO 3166 two-letter country code, e.g. CN for China; comments from the ISO/CS editing unit are identified by **) 2 Type of comment: ge = general te = technical ed = editorial NOTE Columns 1, 2, 4, 5 are compulsory. page 1 of 1 ISO electronic balloting commenting template/version 2001-10 Template for comments and secretariat observations Date: Document: 1 2 (3) 4 5 (6) (7) MB1 Clause No./ Paragraph/ Type Comment (justification for change) by the MB Proposed change by the MB Secretariat observations Subclause No./ Figure/Table/ of on each comment submitted Annex Note com- (e.g. 3.1) (e.g. Table 1) ment2 JP 16.5 te The current amendment text calls sequences such as Remove the first tabular list (beginning with <0023, <0023, FE0E, 20E3> a variation sequence, though it FE0E, 20E3>) to be inserted from here and move doesn't follow the current definition of a variation it after the following proposed text, leaving the sequence (defined in the first paragraph of 16.5.) <0023, tabular list beginning with <203C, FE0E> only. FE0E, 20E3> is a composite sequence beginning with a variation sequence, or we can call it a variation sequence After the tabular list, add the following text: followed by a particular combining character. The The following list provides a list of variation standard text should not call it as a whole a variation sequences followed by 20E3 COMBINING sequence. ENCLOSING KEYCAP: To accommodate the above concern, separating two Put the removed tabular list beginning with <0023, tabular lists, one for ordinary variation sequences and FE0E, 20E3> here. another for variation sequences followed by a particular combining character, seems a good idea. JP 16.5 ed The current tabular lists for new variation sequences have Change the second headings for the tabular lists a different format from the existing lists of variation to "Description of Variant Appearance".