Ancient Dna: a Multifunctional Tool for Resolving Anthropological Questions
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Departament de Biologia Animal, de Biologia Vegetal i d’Ecologia Unitat d’Antropologia Biològica ANCIENT DNA: A MULTIFUNCTIONAL TOOL FOR RESOLVING ANTHROPOLOGICAL QUESTIONS Marc Simón Martínez PhD dissertation 2015 This research received support from Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia in the project entitled “Efectos de la insularidad, migración y cultura en la evolución de la población humana de Menorca durante la edad de bronce” (CGL2008-00800, CGL2005-02567) and from Institut Menorquí d’Estudis in the project entitled “Caracterización genética de la población de Son Olivaret” (IME2006-01). ANCIENT DNA: A MULTIFUNCTIONAL TOOL FOR RESOLVING ANTHROPOLOGICAL QUESTIONS Dissertation presented by Marc Simón Martínez in fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctorate in Biodiversity of Department de Biologia Animal, de Biologia Vegetal i d’Ecologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, directed by: Dr. Assumpció Malgosa, Chair Professor at Unitat d’Antropologia Biològica, Departament de Biologia Animal, de Biologia Vegetal i d’Ecologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Dr. Assumpció Malgosa Marc Simón Martínez Sigue mi voz. Sigue mi voz. Ábrete camino hasta mí. Combate la oscuridad. La desesperación. Lucha hasta que luchar sea imposible. Y luego vuelve a abrirte camino hasta mí. Sigue mi voz. Sigue mi voz. Joseph Michael Straczynski, writer ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It is very difficult to try to sum up in a few lines the greetings to all the people with whom I shared this journey, so I will start right now. I apologize first as I will only mention the people with whom I’ve coincided the most. Otherwise the list would be endless, but I want to thank all of them. I am indebted, and forever will be, with Nancy Díaz, Eduvigis Solórzano and Andrea Smerling for putting me under their guidance and showing me how to deal with the problems of ancient DNA. Thank you for your support in the good but especially in the bad moments, and for being so patient with me. I want also to thank Mercedes González for being a good friend with whom I have learnt a lot about many matters of life and for her aid. Thank you to Cristina Santos, Núria Armentano and Xavier Jordana for their help whenever we have shared a project or simply coincided, their advices have been a driving force for my improvement more times than they can ever suspect. I will always remember the chats spent during endless afternoons with Luis Álvarez and Pere Ibáñez. Even though I was always right they kept defending their point so passionately that the conversations ended being interesting! Nah, I’m kidding, thank you for your friendship, for the laughs and for listening to me whenever I needed to talk. A very special person for me is Gemma Prats-Muñoz. She extended her hand to me in the most difficult moment and I will never forget it. It was a tough thing to do, and she is tougher than she thinks. Thank you for the good moments spent in the lunch zone, especially to María Cabezas, Mar González, Mònica Pujol and Dominika Nociarová who have always tried to give me wise advices regarding life in general. I know that behind the jokes they did it in good faith. I would also like to mention Jordi Díaz and María Fontanals, whose friendship and kindness made me put a smile whenever they were around. Thank you to Maria Pilar Aluja for her companionship during the late nights where we were the only ones remaining and for her support. Many thanks to Cristina Afonso and Pere Gelabert for making me feel comfortable while working with them and for all the chats from which I have always learnt something new to improve. Thank you to Rafael Montiel for his support and dedication each and every time I have written to him in order to solve an apparently endless amount of doubts regarding population genetics. And thank you to Assumpció Malgosa, the person with whom I’m most indebted. Thank you for keeping your confidence in me regardless of my ups and downs, in the good and bad moments you’ve been there for me. Finally, I want to thank my parents for not giving up on me in spite of all the difficulties that my personality carries. Without you the present work wouldn’t exist. ABSTRACT In the current thesis we have examined anthropological questions of ancient Catalonian and Balearic populations using DNA. First, we have tried to improve our methodology applying a different protocol in the study of a site which had provided unexpected poor results. We have seen that under some circumstances the change of our protocol using phenol-clorophorm for the kit QIAamp DNA investigator which uses DNA affinity to silica particles is positive and delivers significantly better results, although it seems that the optimal method can vary at any given site and a consideration on a site by site basis should be made when deciding the most suitable protocol. Next, we have aimed to go into the analysis of intrapopulational relationships in groups buried in close association to analyze the role of nuclear families in the antiquity. We examined a common burial cave from Catalonia in the Late Bronze Age, and proved that the hypothesis considering the individuals found in Catalonia’s burial cave a nuclear family was erroneous. The high mtDNA variability inside the group and the fact that the only shared haplogroup (4 individuals) was uncommon in the region at that time, suggested the existence of a patrilocal mating system with the integration of foreign women and pointed to the kinship of some of the individuals. Our conclusion is that possibly the genetic ties were not the only determinant factor in close groups in the Late Bronze Age in contrast to the situation in current nuclear families in Western society, with cultural issues also playing an important role in what could possibly seen as an extended family structure. Concerning ancient Balearic populations, we analyzed intra and interpopulational relationships. In general their frequency of haplogroup H was very important since at least the Iron Age, with the exception of one necropolis, Son Real, which has very particular characteristics. This fits with the high values from their contemporary populations from the Western Mediterranean as well as with the current ones, exception made of Current Minorca which may be influenced by the English colonization during the XVIIIth century. Our results in the Minorcan necropolises proved the lack of sex bias in the interments and suggested different lifestyles between the populations living in the plain and those living in the rugged southern coast regarding inbreeding. In Majorca we proved a differential use of the necropolises. With the exception of Son Real, all the ancient Balearic necropolises seem to have an homogeneous European haplogroup pool so these differences evidence that the individual treatment of each necropolis makes sense as they all have their own uniqueness. The haplotipic analysis confirms that they already belong to the European genetic variability and show a very similar genetic pool to the ancient Catalan population, reaffirming their already documented historic interactions, and rules out a direct relationship between the members of the Nuragic and the Talaiotic cultures regarding the feminine lineages. Finally, we have made a first approach to the illnesses which accompanied these populations studying a widespread infection as caries. Studying the virulence factor dextranase of the cariogenic agent Streptococcus mutans we have been able to use direct data from the Bronze Age to the current era to propose that it has been evolving under neutral evolution at least since then and that a constraint of the selective pressure in this segment seems the most plausible explanation to understand its changes over time. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction………………………………………………………………………… …………19 1.1. History of ancient DNA analysis .......................................................................................... 21 1.2. Ancient DNA characteristics and potential interactions with environmental factors 1.2.1 Ancient DNA damage 1.2.1.1 Decay of organic remains ...................................................................................... 26 1.2.1.2 Physical and chemical agents damaging DNA ...................................................... 27 1.2.1.3 Main types of damage ............................................................................................ 29 1.2.2 Inhibition 1.2.2.1 Nature of the inhibitors .......................................................................................... 30 1.2.2.2 Avoiding inhibition ................................................................................................ 32 1.2.3 Contamination 1.2.3.1 The importance of contamination in aDNA works ................................................ 33 1.2.3.2 Reporting contamination ........................................................................................ 34 1.2.3.3 Decontamination methodologies ........................................................................... 35 1.3. Authenticity criteria 1.3.1 Initial rules ..................................................................................................................... 36 1.3.2 Phylogenetic and populational meaning:Refining the criteria ....................................... 40 1.3.3 Decontamination: could it be achieved? ....................................................................... 41 1.3.4 The arrival of High-Throughput Sequencing: new considerations ...............................