DOCSLIB.ORG

200 Subpart G—Import Into and Export from the United States

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
200 Subpart G—Import Into and Export from the United States § 670.30 45 CFR Ch. VI (10–1–10 Edition) HSM 67 Rock shelter ‘Granite House’ lations in this part, or the permit at Cape Geology, Granite Harbour under which they were taken. HSM 68 Depot at Hells Gate Moraine, Inexpressible Island, Terra Nova Bay § 670.32 Specific issuance criteria for HSM 69 Message post at Cape Crozier, exports. Ross Island The Director may permit export from HSM 70 Message post at Cape the United States of any native mam- Wadworth, Coulman Island mal, bird, or native plants taken with- HSM 71 Whaling station at Whalers in Antarctica upon a finding that ex- Bay, Deception Island portation would be consistent with the HSM 72 Cairn on Tryne Islands, purposes of the Act, the regulations in Vestfold Hills this part, or the permit under which HSM 73 Memorial Cross, Lewis Bay, they were taken. Ross Island HSM 74 Wreckage of sailing ship, Ele- § 670.33 Content of permit applica- tions. phant Island, South Shetland Islands HSM 75 ‘A Hut’, Pram Point, Ross Is- In addition to the information re- land quired in subpart C of this part, an ap- HSM 76 Ruins of base ‘Pedro Aguirre plicant seeking a permit to import into Cerda’, Pendulum Cove, Deception Is- or export from the United States a na- land tive mammal, a native bird, or native HSM 77 Cape Denison, Commonwealth plants taken within Antarctica shall Bay, George V Land include the following in the applica- HSM 78 Memorial Plaque at India tion: Point, Humboldt Mountains, (a) Information demonstrating that Wohlthat Massif, central Dronning the import or export would further the Maud Land purposes for which the species was HSM 79 Lilie Marleen Hut, Mt. taken; Dockery, Everett Range, Northern (b) Information demonstrating that Victoria Land the import or export is consistent with HSM 80 Amundsen’s Tent the purposes of the Act or the regula- HSM 81 Rocher du De´barquement tions in this part; (Landing Rock) (c) A statement as to which U.S. port HSM 82 Monument to the Antarctic will be used for the import or export, Treaty and Plaque and (d) Information describing the in- [73 FR 14940, Mar. 20, 2008] tended ultimate disposition of the im- ported or exported item. § 670.30 [Reserved] § 670.34 Entry and exit ports. Subpart G—Import Into and Export (a) Any native mammal, native bird, From the United States or native plants taken within Antarc- tica that are imported into or exported § 670.31 Specific issuance criteria for from the United States must enter or imports. leave the United States at ports des- Subject to compliance with other ap- ignated by the Secretary of Interior in plicable law, any person who takes a 50 CFR part 14. The ports currently native mammal, bird, or plant under a designated are: permit issued under the regulations in (1) Los Angeles, California. this part may import it into the United (2) San Francisco, California. States unless the Director finds that (3) Miami, Florida. the importation would not further the (4) Honolulu, Hawaii. purpose for which it was taken. If the (5) Chicago, Illinois. importation is for a purpose other than (6) New Orleans, Louisiana. that for which the native mammal, (7) New York, New York. bird, or plant was taken, the Director (8) Seattle, Washington. may permit importation upon a finding (9) Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas. that importation would be consistent (10) Portland, Oregon. with the purposes of the Act, the regu- (11) Baltimore, Maryland. 200 VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:16 Dec 02, 2010 Jkt 220189 PO 00000 Frm 00210 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220189.XXX 220189 erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with CFR National Science Foundation § 671.1 (12) Boston, Massachusetts. § 670.39 [Reserved] (13) Atlanta, Georgia. (b) Permits to import or export at PART 671—WASTE REGULATION non-designated ports may be sought from the Secretary of Interior pursu- Subpart A—Introduction ant to subpart C, 50 CFR part 14. Sec. § 670.35 [Reserved] 671.1 Purpose of regulations. 671.2 Scope. 671.3 Definitions. Subpart H—Introduction of Non- Indigenous Plants and Animals Subpart B—Prohibited Acts, Exceptions § 670.36 Specific issuance criteria. 671.4 Prohibited acts. 671.5 Exceptions. For purposes consistent with the Act, only the following plants and animals Subpart C—Permits may be considered for a permit allow- ing their introduction into Antarctica: 671.6 Applications for permits. 671.7 General issuance criteria. (a) Domestic plants; and 671.8 Permit administration. (b) Laboratory animals and plants in- 671.9 Conditions of permit. cluding viruses, bacteria, yeasts, and 671.10 Review, modification, suspension, and fungi. revocation. Living non-indigenous species of birds shall not be introduced into Ant- Subpart D—Waste Management arctica. 671.11 Waste storage. 671.12 Waste disposal. § 670.37 Content of permit applica- 671.13 Waste management for the USAP. tions. Applications for the introduction of Subpart E—Designation of Banned plants and animals into Antarctica Substances; Reclassification of Pollutants must describe: 671.14 Annual review. (a) The species, numbers, and if ap- 671.15 Publication of preliminary deter- propriate, the age and sex, of the ani- mination. mals or plants to be introduced into 671.16 Designation and redesignation of pol- lutants. Antarctica; (b) The need for the plants or ani- Subpart F—Cases of Emergency mals; (c) What precautions the applicant 671.17 Cases of emergency. will take to prevent escape or contact AUTHORITY: 16 U.S.C. 2405. with native fauna and flora; and SOURCE: 58 FR 34719, June 29, 1993, unless (d) How the plants or animals will be otherwise noted. removed from Antarctica or destroyed after they have served their purpose. Subpart A—Introduction § 670.38 Conditions of permits. § 671.1 Purpose of regulations. All permits allowing the introduction The purposes of these regulations in of non-indigenous plants and animals part 671 are to protect the Antarctic will require that the animal or plant be environment and dependent and associ- kept under controlled conditions to ated ecosystems, to preserve Antarc- prevent its escape or contact with na- tica’s value as an area for the conduct tive fauna and flora and that after of scientific research, and to imple- serving its purpose the plant or animal ment the Antarctic Conservation Act shall be removed from Antarctica or be of 1978, Public Law 95–541, consistent destroyed in manner that protects the with the provisions of the Protocol on natural system of Antarctica. Environmental Protection to the Ant- arctic Treaty, signed in Madrid, Spain, on October 4, 1991. 201 VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:16 Dec 02, 2010 Jkt 220189 PO 00000 Frm 00211 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220189.XXX 220189 erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with CFR.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Antarctic Peninsula
    Hucke-Gaete, R, Torres, D. & Vallejos, V. 1997c. Entanglement of Antarctic fur seals, Arctocephalus gazella, by marine debris at Cape Shirreff and San Telmo Islets, Livingston Island, Antarctica: 1998-1997. Serie Científica Instituto Antártico Chileno 47: 123-135. Hucke-Gaete, R., Osman, L.P., Moreno, C.A. & Torres, D. 2004. Examining natural population growth from near extinction: the case of the Antarctic fur seal at the South Shetlands, Antarctica. Polar Biology 27 (5): 304–311 Huckstadt, L., Costa, D. P., McDonald, B. I., Tremblay, Y., Crocker, D. E., Goebel, M. E. & Fedak, M. E. 2006. Habitat Selection and Foraging Behavior of Southern Elephant Seals in the Western Antarctic Peninsula. American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2006, abstract #OS33A-1684. INACH (Instituto Antártico Chileno) 2010. Chilean Antarctic Program of Scientific Research 2009-2010. Chilean Antarctic Institute Research Projects Department. Santiago, Chile. Kawaguchi, S., Nicol, S., Taki, K. & Naganobu, M. 2006. Fishing ground selection in the Antarctic krill fishery: Trends in patterns across years, seasons and nations. CCAMLR Science, 13: 117–141. Krause, D. J., Goebel, M. E., Marshall, G. J., & Abernathy, K. (2015). Novel foraging strategies observed in a growing leopard seal (Hydrurga leptonyx) population at Livingston Island, Antarctic Peninsula. Animal Biotelemetry, 3:24. Krause, D.J., Goebel, M.E., Marshall. G.J. & Abernathy, K. In Press. Summer diving and haul-out behavior of leopard seals (Hydrurga leptonyx) near mesopredator breeding colonies at Livingston Island, Antarctic Peninsula. Marine Mammal Science.Leppe, M., Fernandoy, F., Palma-Heldt, S. & Moisan, P 2004. Flora mesozoica en los depósitos morrénicos de cabo Shirreff, isla Livingston, Shetland del Sur, Península Antártica, in Actas del 10º Congreso Geológico Chileno.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 70, No. 218/Monday, November 14, 2005
    69098 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 218 / Monday, November 14, 2005 / Rules and Regulations * * * * * unless authorized by permit as well as hereby designated as Antarctic Specially [FR Doc. 05–22466 Filed 11–10–05; 8:45 am] the ACA’s blanket prohibition on Protected Areas (ASPA). The Antarctic BILLING CODE 6560–50–P damaging, removing or destroying a Conservation Act of 1978, as amended, Historic Site or Monument. No public prohibits, unless authorized by a permit, comment is needed the addition of these any person from entering or engaging in NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION areas or sites merely implements activities within an ASPA. Detailed measures adopted by the Treaty Parties maps and descriptions of the sites and 45 CFR Part 670 at various ATCM meetings. complete management plans can be Finally, these amendments correct obtained from the National Science Conservation of Antarctic Animals and typographical errors in the names and Foundation, Office of Polar Programs, Plants numerical listings of several specially National Science Foundation, Room protected areas previously published in AGENCY: National Science Foundation. 755, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, § 670.29. Virginia 22230. ACTION: Direct final rule. Determinations ASPA 101 Taylor Rookery, Mac. SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Antarctic NSF has determined, under the Robertson Land, East Antarctica Conservation Act of 1978, The National ASPA 102 Rookery Islands, Holme criteria set forth in Executive Order Science Foundation (NSF) is amending Bay, Mac. Robertson Land, East 12866, that this rule is not a significant its regulations to designate additional Antarctica regulatory action requiring review by Antarctic Specially Protected Areas ASPA 103 Ardery Island and Odbert the Office of Management and Budget.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 70, No. 218/Monday, November 14, 2005
    69100 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 218 / Monday, November 14, 2005 / Rules and Regulations HSM 47 Buildings on I˘le des Pe´trels, HSM 76 Ruins of base ‘‘Pedro Aguirre Dated: November 4, 2005. Terre Ade´lie Cerda’’, Pendulum Cove, Deception Gerald Zaffos, HSM 48 Cross on ˘Ile des Pe´trels, Terre Island Director, Contract Policy Division. Ade´lie HSM 77 Cape Denison, Federal Acquisition Circular HSM 49 Pillar at Bunger Hill, Queen Commonwealth Bay, George V Land Mary Land Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) HSM 50 Plaque at Fildes Peninsula, HSM 78 Memorial Plaque at India Point, Humboldt Mountains, 2005-06 Correction is issued under the King George Island, South Shetland authority of the Secretary of Defense, Islands Wohlthat Massif, central Dronning Maud Land the Administrator of General Services, HSM 51 Grave and cross at Admiralty and the Administrator for the National Bay, King George Island, South HSM 79 Lilie Marleen Hut, Mt. Aeronautics and Space Administration. Shetland Islands Dockery, Everett Range, Northern HSM 52 Monolith at Fildes Peninsula, Victoria Land Unless otherwise specified, all Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) King George Island, South Shetland HSM 80 Amundsen’s Tent Islands and other directive material contained HSM 53 Monolith and plaques on [FR Doc. 05–22545 Filed 11–10–05; 8:45 am] in FAC 2005-06 Correction are effective Elephant Island, South Shetland BILLING CODE 7555–01–M November 14, 2005. Islands Dated: November 4, 2005. HSM 54 Bust on Ross Island Domenic C. Cipicchio, HSM 55 Buildings and artifacts on DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Acting Director, Defense Procurement and Stonington Island, Marguerite Bay, Acquisition Policy.
    [Show full text]
  • SECTION THREE: Historic Sites and Monuments in Antarctica
    SECTION THREE: Historic Sites and Monuments in Antarctica The need to protect historic sites and monuments became apparent as the number of expeditions to the Antarctic increased. At the Seventh Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting it was agreed that a list of historic sites and monuments be created. So far 74 sites have been identified. All of them are monuments – human artifacts rather than areas – and many of them are in close proximity to scientific stations. Provision for protection of these sites is contained in Annex V, Article 8. Listed Historic Sites and Monuments may not be damaged, removed, or destroyed. 315 List of Historic Sites and Monuments Identified and Described by the Proposing Government or Governments 1. Flag mast erected in December 1965 at the South Geographical Pole by the First Argentine Overland Polar Expedition. 2. Rock cairn and plaques at Syowa Station (Lat 69°00’S, Long 39°35’E) in memory of Shin Fukushima, a member of the 4th Japanese Antarctic Research Expedition, who died in October 1960 while performing official duties. The cairn was erected on 11 January 1961, by his colleagues. Some of his ashes repose in the cairn. 3. Rock cairn and plaque on Proclamation Island, Enderby Land, erected in January 1930 by Sir Douglas Mawson (Lat 65°51’S, Long 53°41’E) The cairn and plaque commemorate the landing on Proclamation Island of Sir Douglas Mawson with a party from the British, Australian and New Zealand Antarctic Research Expedition of 1929­ 31. 4. Station building to which a bust of V. I. Lenin is fixed, together with a plaque in memory of the conquest of the Pole of Inaccessibility by Soviet Antarctic explorers in 1958 (Lat 83°06’S, Long 54°58’E).
    [Show full text]
  • ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT – AUSTRALIAN ANTARCTIC PROGRAM AVIATION OPERATIONS 2020-2025 Draft Released for Public Comment
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT – AUSTRALIAN ANTARCTIC PROGRAM AVIATION OPERATIONS 2020-2025 draft released for public comment This document should be cited as: Commonwealth of Australia (2020). Environmental Impact Assessment – Australian Antarctic Program Aviation Operations 2020-2025 – draft released for public comment. Australian Antarctic Division, Kingston. © Commonwealth of Australia 2020 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to. Disclaimer The contents of this document have been compiled using a range of source materials and were valid as at the time of its preparation. The Australian Government is not liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of or reliance on the contents of the document. Cover photos from L to R: groomed runway surface, Globemaster C17 at Wilkins Aerodrome, fuel drum stockpile at Davis, Airbus landing at Wilkins Aerodrome Prepared by: Dr Sandra Potter on behalf of: Mr Robb Clifton Operations Manager Australian Antarctic Division Kingston 7050 Australia 2 Contents Overview 7 1. Background 9 1.1 Australian Antarctic Program aviation 9 1.2 Previous assessments of aviation activities 10 1.3 Scope of this environmental impact assessment 11 1.4 Consultation and decision outcomes 12 2. Details of the proposed activity and its need 13 2.1 Introduction 13 2.2 Inter-continental flights 13 2.3 Air-drop operations 14 2.4 Air-to-air refuelling operations 14 2.5 Operation of Wilkins Aerodrome 15 2.6 Intra-continental fixed-wing operations 17 2.7 Operation of ski landing areas 18 2.8 Helicopter operations 18 2.9 Fuel storage and use 19 2.10 Aviation activities at other sites 20 2.11 Unmanned aerial systems 20 2.12 Facility decommissioning 21 3.
    [Show full text]
  • 7555-01-U National Science Foundation
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 04/23/2019 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2019-08024, and on govinfo.gov 7555-01-U NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION 45 CFR Part 670 Conservation of Antarctic Animals and Plants RIN: 3145-AA59 AGENCY: National Science Foundation. ACTION: Direct final rule. SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978, as amended, the National Science Foundation (NSF) is amending its regulations to reflect changes to designated Antarctic specially protected areas (ASPA), Antarctic specially managed areas (ASMA) and historic sites or monuments (HSM). These changes reflect decisions already adopted by the Antarctic Treaty Parties at recent Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meetings (ATCM). The United States Department of State heads the United States delegation to these annual Antarctic Treaty meetings. DATES: Effective [INSERT DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bijan Gilanshah, Assistant General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, at 703-292-8060, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Suite W 18200, Alexandria, VA 22314. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978, as amended ("ACA") (16 U.S.C. 2401, et seq.) implements the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty ("the Protocol"). Annex V contains provisions for the protection of specially designated areas specially managed areas and historic sites and monuments. Section 2405 of title 16 of the ACA directs the Director of the National Science Foundation to issue such regulations as are necessary and appropriate to implement Annex V to the Protocol. The Antarctic Treaty Parties, which includes the United States, periodically adopt measures to establish, consolidate or revoke specially protected areas, specially managed areas and historical sites or monuments in Antarctica.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation of New Indian Research Base at Larsemann Hills, Antarctica
    Draft Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation of New Indian Research Base at Larsemann Hills, Antarctica 5. INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE 5.1 Location The Larsemann Hills (69o20’S to 69o30’S Lat: 75o55’E to76o30’E Long), an ice-free area of approximately 50 km2, is located on the Ingrid Christensen Coast of Princess Elizabeth Land in East Antarctica To the northeast of the hills are the Rauer Islands and the Vestfold Hills and to the west-southwest are the Bolingen Islands and the Amery ice shelf. The area was not discovered until 1935 when Captain Klarius Mikkelsen, led an expedition for the Norwegian whaling magnate, Lars Christensen. Subsequently Australian National Antarctic Research Expedition (ANARE) led by Dr. Phillip G. Law landed in the area in March 1954 (Burgess et al., 1994). Four research stations namely the Progress I & Progress II (Russia), Law- Racovita (Australia-Romania) and Zhongshan (China) are located on the Larsemann Hills. The westerly oceanic currents break the fast ice during early summer facilitating the entry of the vessels quite close to these stations. The Indian Antarctic base is proposed to be located on an ice-free rocky area, situated between Quilty Bay on the east and Thala Fjord on the west (Figure 18). Figure 18 : Larsemann Hills h proposed site (Source: AAD) 5.2 Geology 5.2.1 Geology of the Larsemann Hills The local coastline has many indentations with fjords forming deep inlets. The highest point in the promontory where the station is being proposed is around 105 metres above msl. Geology of the area has been established by the detailed work of Sheraton and Collerson 41 Draft Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation of New Indian Research Base at Larsemann Hills, Antarctica (1983); Stuwe et al.(1989); Carson et.
    [Show full text]
  • Bu I Leti N No
    The International Council for Science ~C~&~bu I leti n No. 153 April 2004 Twenty-sixth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting Madrid, Spain, 9-20 June 2003. Decisions, Resolutions and Measures p 1 Published by the SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON ANTARCTIC RESEARCH atthe Scott Polar Research Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom THE INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SCIENCE SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON ANTARCTIC RESEARCH SCAR BULLETIN No 153, April 2004 Twenty-sixth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting Madrid, Spain, 9-20 June 2003 Decisions, Resolutions and Measures MEASURE 2 (2003) ANTARCTIC PROTECTED AREA SYSTEM: MANAGEMENT PLANS FOR ANTARCTIC SPECIALLY PROTECTED AREAS The Representatives Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 143, Marine Plain, Mule Peninsula, Vestfold Hills, Princess Elizabeth Land; Recalling Resolution l (1998) ofXXIV ATCM allocating Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 152, Western responsibility among Consultative Parties for the revision Bransfield Strait, Antarctic Peninsula; of Management Plans for protected areas; Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 153, Eastern Noting that the draft Management Plans annexed to Dallmann Bay, Antarctic Peninsula; this Measure have been endorsed by the Committee for Environmental Protection and the Scientific Committee Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 154, Botany Bay, Cape Geology, Victoria Land; on Antarctic Research; Recognising that these Areas support outstanding natural Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 156, Lewis Bay, features and biota of scientific interest; Mount Erebus, Ross Island, Ross Sea; Recommend that their Governments, in accordance with Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 160, Frazier Islands, paragraph l of Article 6 of Annex V to the Protocol on Wilkes Land; Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty. approve Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 161, Terra Nova the Management Plans, annexed to this Measure, for the Bay, Ross Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's Contribution to Antarctic Climate Science
    Australia’s contribution to Antarctic climate science AUSTRALIA’S ANTARCTIC SCIENCE PROGRAM Edited by D. Michael Stoddart Australian Antarctic Division April 2008 photographs © Commonwealth of Australia Contents 1 – Introduction 1 2 – The Antarctic Ice Sheet and sea-level 4 3 – Sea Ice 8 4 – The Southern Ocean 12 5 – Reconstruction of past climates 16 6 – Antarctica’s Atmosphere 20 7 – Concluding remarks 22 8 – References 23 1 – Introduction Australia has had a long and distinguished record of research into Antarctica’s natural phenomena, including early fundamental studies into the nature of the ice sheet, ice shelves and sea ice. As the world’s attention focuses on changing climates in the 21st century that legacy of fundamental work, together with a large suite of interdisciplinary studies embracing the ocean around Antarctica, its biota, and the atmosphere above is of immense value in underpinning to a comprehensive understanding of contemporary change and its environmental consequences. This paper attempts to summarise the value of the contributions made by Australian scientists to international high-latitude climate science and to indicate the level of international visibility of Australian researchers in Antarctic science. For a country with a population of 20 million Australia’s impact in the international arena is widely felt. Antarctic science was recently identified as one of our international research strengths (PMSEIC 2006). Our natural advantages of proximity to Antarctica make access for scientific research easier than in the case for northern hemisphere nations. The Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2007) has highlighted the paucity of knowledge about the polar regions of the Earth, regions where climate change is expected to be greatest because of feedback processes involving ice and snow.
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving Antarctic Biodiversity in the Anthropocene
    Conserving Antarctic biodiversity in the Anthropocene Jasmine Lee A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2018 School of Biological Sciences Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science Abstract Anthropogenic activity threatens biodiversity worldwide, with the species and ecosystems of even the most remote and largest remaining wilderness at risk. In Antarctica, human activity is growing, barriers to invasive species establishment are being lowered, pollution is pervasive, and climate change directly and indirectly threatens taxa across the region. This has the potential to impact some of the world’s most unusual, isolated, and highly-adapted species. Evolving in isolation for long periods, a number of specialised lower plants and invertebrates dominate Antarctic ecosystems, with mosses, lichens, microbes, arthropods and soil microfauna present across the continent. Seals and seabirds breed in coastal regions and two flowering plants survive in the milder conditions of the Antarctic Peninsula. In this thesis I provide crucial impact assessments for some of the key processes threatening Antarctic biodiversity, and produce the first inclusive, continent-wide prioritisation of management strategies for conserving Antarctic biodiversity in the face of multiple threats, which will help to inform decision makers in identifying cost-effective conservation strategies. The vast majority of Antarctic life survives only in the less than 1% of the Antarctic continent that is permanently ice-free, where soils and rocks areas emerge as nunataks, dry valleys, cliffs, fellfields, and coastal oases. Despite being crucial habitat, we have limited understanding of how ice-free areas will be impacted by climate change. In Chapter 2 I use temperature-index melt modelling to determine the potential impacts of climate change on Antarctic biodiversity habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised List of Historic Sites and Monuments
    Measure 19 (2015) Annex Revised List of Historic Sites and Monuments Designation/ No. Description Location Amendment 1. Flag mast erected in December 1965 at the South Geographical Pole by the First Argentine Overland Polar 90S Rec. VII-9 Expedition. Original proposing Party: Argentina Party undertaking management: Argentina 2. Rock cairn and plaques at Syowa Station in memory of Shin Fukushima, a member of the 4th Japanese 6900'S, Rec. VII-9 Antarctic Research Expedition, who died in October 1960 while performing official duties. The cairn was 3935'E erected on 11 January 1961, by his colleagues. Some of his ashes repose in the cairn. Original proposing Party: Japan Party undertaking management: Japan 3. Rock cairn and plaque on Proclamation Island, Enderby Land, erected in January 1930 by Sir Douglas 6551'S, Rec.VII-9 Mawson. The cairn and plaque commemorate the landing on Proclamation Island of Sir Douglas 5341'E Mawson with a party from the British, Australian and New Zealand Antarctic Research Expedition of 1929-31. Original proposing Party: Australia Party undertaking management: Australia 4. Pole of Inaccessibility Station building. Station building to which a bust of V.I. Lenin is fixed, together 82°06'42”S, Rec. VII-9 with a plaque in memory of the conquest of the Pole of Inaccessibility by Soviet Antarctic explorers in 55°01'57”E Measure 11(2012) 1958. As of 2007 the station building was covered by snow. The bust of Lenin is erected on the wooden stand mounted on the building roof at about 1.5 m high above the snow surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report of the XXVI ATCM
    Final Report of XXVI ATCM FINAL REPORT 16/07/2003 1 Final Report of XXVI ATCM CONTENTS SUBJECT PAGE Acronyms and Abbreviations 4 PART I: FINAL REPORT OF XXVI ATCM 6 Appendix 1: Procedure for the Appointment of the Executive 40 Secretary of the Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty Appendix 2: Indicative estimates of the costs of the Secretariat of 45 The Antarctic Treaty. Part II: MEASURES, DECISIONS AND RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED 48 AT XXVI ATCM Annex A: Measures 49 Measure 1 (2003) Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty 50 Measure 2 (2003) Antarctic protected area system: 62 management plans for antarctic specially protected areas. ASPA No 105, Beaufort Island, Ross Sea; 63 ASPA No 114, Northern Coronation Island, South 82 Orkney Islands; ASPA No 118, Cryptogam Ridge, Mt Melbourne, 95 North Victoria Land and summit of Mt Melbourne, North Victoria Land; ASPA No 135, North-East Bailey Peninsula, Budd 106 Coast, Wilkes Land ASPA No 143, Marine Plain, Mule Peninsula, Vestfold 134 Hills, Princess Elizabeth Land; ASPA No 152, Western Bransfield Strait, Antarctic 155 Peninsula; ASPA No 153, Eastern Dallmann Bay, Antarctic 167 Peninsula; ASPA No 154, Botany Bay, Cape Geology, Victoria 180 Land; ASPA No 156, Lewis Bay, Mount Erebus, Ross Island, 193 Ross Sea; ASPA No 160, Frazier Islands, Wilkes Land; 201 ASPA No 161, Terra Nova Bay, Ross Sea. 221 Measure 3 (2003): Antarctic Protected Areas System: 240 Revised List of Historic Sites and Monuments Annex B: Decisions 256 Decision 1 (2003) Apportioning Contributions to the 257 Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty Decision 2 (2003) Provisional application of Measure 1 260 (2003) Decision 3 (2003) Staff Regulations for the Secretariat 264 of the Antarctic Treaty 2 Final Report of XXVI ATCM Decision 4 (2003) Financial Regulations for the 276 Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty Decision 5 (2003) Meeting of Experts on Tourism and 285 Non–Governmental Activities.
    [Show full text]