The Emerging Private Equity Market in Asia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Emerging Private Equity Market in Asia The Emerging Private Equity Market in Asia May 2008 2008 © Probitas Partners Contents Introduction ........................................................................ 1 The Asian Private Equity Market .................................... 2 Economic Factors Across a Diverse Geography ........ 2 Strong Underlying Fundamentals ................................. 5 Private Equity Fundraising Trends in Asia .................. 8 Perceived Attractiveness by Foreign Investors ........ 12 Potential Issues to Consider When Investing in Private Equiy in Asia ................................ 13 The Difficulties of Due Diligence for Foreign Investors .............................................................. 13 Summary ............................................................................... 16 Asia–Focused Private Equity Funds in or Coming to Market ....................................................... 17 Asian Roots, Global Benchmarks Axiom Asia is a leading Fund of Funds management company, founded with the vision of offering limited partners interested in Asia the experience of a senior team of private equity professionals who have worked together at one of Asia’s leading institutions. Each member of the team combines experience in Asian and global private equity, and have worked on both fund and direct investment transactions. We aim to develop long–term relationships with the best fund managers in Asia, serving as a value–added hub between our sophisticated limited partner base and our portfolio general partners. Probitas Partners is a leading independent knowledge, innovation, and solutions provider to private markets clients globally. We focus our expertise in fund placement, liquidity management and portfolio management to constantly build and grow powerful, lasting relationships that deliver value, execution and service to our partners and clients. We emphasize private equity and real assets, including debt and equity funds, venture capital, special situations, opportunistic real estate and infrastructure from around the world. Probitas Partners offers research and investment tools on the alternative investment market as aids to its institutional investor and general partner clients. Accurate data is elusive in private markets. Probitas Partners shares this data in an effort to improve professionalism, consistently raise the bar on professional services, and assist all participants in their investment, portfolio management and fund raising endeavors. 1 Confidential & Trade Secret ©2008 Do not circulate or publish. The Asian Private Equity Market Economic Factors Across A Diverse Geography Investing in Private Equity in Asia has Asia is an economically diverse market attracted increased attention in recent years, that encompasses developed economies both locally and from North America and such as Japan and Australia, dramatically Europe, on the back of strong economic growing economic powerhouses such as growth and continued financial and economic China and India, and emerging economies liberalization. This paper provides an overview such as Vietnam and Cambodia that are at of the key facts, attractions, and challenges various points on the economic spectrum. for an institutional investor looking to enter The spread in 2007 Gross Domestic the Asian market. Product (“GDP”) Per Capita from U.S. $818 in Vietnam to U.S. $43,312 in Australia noted in Chart I is indicative of the range of consumers, businesses and general economic development across the region, driving very different investment opportunities in each country. Chart I 2007 GDP Per Capita in USD, Current Dollars Australia 43,312 Singapore 35,163 Japan 34,312 New Zealand 30,256 Hong Kong 29,650 Korea 19,751 Taiwan 16,606 Malaysia 6,948 Thailand 3,737 China 2,461 Indonesia 1,925 Philippines 1,625 India 978 Vietnam 818 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 50,000 Source: International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2008 Confidential & Trade Secret ©2008 Do not circulate or publish. 2 Chart II GDP Growth and 2007–2009 Growth Forecast China 10.3% 9.2% Vietnam 8.3% 7.3% India 7.5% 6.6% Indonesia 6.2% 2.9% 6.0% Philippines 4.3% 5.7% Malaysia 4.8% 5.6% Singapore 5.4% Thailand 4.8% 2.9% Hong Kong 4.8% 4.2% South Korea 4.5% 4.5% Australia 3.3% 3.5% New Zealand 2.5% 2.9% Japan 1.7% 1.3% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% GDP Growth, 1996–2006 GDP Growth Forecast, 2007–2009 Source: World Bank (USD Constant Dollars Indexed to Year 2000), Forecasts from Economic Intelligence Unit and Bloomberg Chart III 2007 GDP by Country in Billions of USD, Current Dollars Japan 4,383 China 3,250 India 1,098 South Korea 957 Australia 908 Indonesia 433 Thailand 246 Hong Kong 206 Malaysia 186 Singapore 161 Philippines 144 New Zealand 128 Vietnam 70 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 Source: International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2008 3 Confidential & Trade Secret ©2008 Do not circulate or publish. Also important are the large differences in of each sector appropriately depending GDP growth rates noted in Chart II. Quickly on where each country is situated on the developing economies such as China and development curve. This contrasts with the India, with GDP growth rates of 6% and two–pronged model which dominates North greater, are dealing with an entirely different American private equity, where Growth set of economic imperatives and investment Capital investing runs a poor third to Buyouts opportunities than larger, more developed and Venture Capital. economies in the region such as Japan, which is dealing with the issues attendant Within the rapidly growing economic upon growth rates of less than 2%. powerhouses of China and India, significant in–country economic differences exist The absolute economic size of these between local regions. Consider for example economies also affects private equity the doubling of China’s per capital GDP over investment opportunities. For example, the last 10 years from U.S. $716 in 1996 to though the Vietnamese economy is growing U.S. $1,595 in 2006 (as measured in Year quite strongly, its overall level of GDP is low, 2000 constant dollars from the World Bank). especially when compared to the rapidly The headline number is indicative of general growing economies of China and India. wealth creation throughout the country. As seen in Chart III, the sheer size of the However, wealth creation is often uneven. Chinese and Indian economies results in more Coastal provinces are much richer than varied and sizable investment opportunities inland ones, and the disparity in income can than are available in smaller countries such be large. As shown in Chart IV, Shanghai’s as Vietnam. per capita GDP of U.S. $6,599 is ten times that of Guizhou’s (an inland province) at As a result, Asia represents a “tri–polar” U.S. $648. Private equity fund managers private equity opportunity where investors operating in this single country need to should pay simultaneous attention to take vastly different investment approaches Growth Capital, Buyout, and Venture Capital depending on the sector and geographic investments, and adjust the relative weighting focus they pursue. Chart IV Variance of GDP Per Capita in China Chinese Administrative Zones with Chinese Administrative Zones with Lowest GDP Per Capita (USD) Highest GDP Per Capita (USD) Guizhou 648 Shanghai 6,599 Gansu 959 Beijing 5,826 Yunnan 1,044 Tianjin 4,588 Anhui 1,112 Zhejiang 3,552 Guangxi 1,127 Jiangsu 3,149 Source: National Bureau of Statistics China, 2005 Confidential & Trade Secret ©2008 Do not circulate or publish. 4 These regional and in–country economic ten times growth in their reserves over the differences are just a sketch of the overall last ten years. The Asian Financial Crisis picture. The cultural differences between economies that were so badly hurt in 1997 different states or provinces can be immense, have not been far behind, with Indonesia and and the local relationships required to source, Thailand recording three times growth and close, and obtain approval for transactions, Malaysia almost five times growth over the the business challenge of recruiting and same period. retaining talent, and the availability and reliability of local infrastructure all vary Foreign Direct Investment (“FDI”) has also significantly from area to area. increased or turned positive in the years following the Asian Financial Crisis in Korea, Strong Underlying Fundamentals Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines, and Singapore, reflecting growing investor Importantly, growth in Asia has been built confidence in each country. Not surprisingly, on sound fundamentals. In Chart V below, China and India, which avoided the Asian one can see that most markets in Asia have Financial Crisis, have continued to attract recorded healthy current account balances steadily growing inflows of foreign capital, over the last five years. These have fueled, reflecting the increased opportunities to in part, unprecedented growth in foreign capture the benefits of lower production exchange reserves noted in Chart VI. Notably, costs for export markets and burgeoning China and India have recorded an impressive domestic markets. Chart V Current Account Surplus/Deficit As a % of GDP 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 -15 Spore Msia China HK Taiwan Japan Phil Indo Thai Korea VN India Aus New Zealand 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Source: International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2008 5 Confidential & Trade Secret ©2008 Do not circulate or publish. Chart VI
Recommended publications
  • The Granular Nature of Large Institutional Investors
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES THE GRANULAR NATURE OF LARGE INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS Itzhak Ben-David Francesco Franzoni Rabih Moussawi John Sedunov Working Paper 22247 http://www.nber.org/papers/w22247 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 May 2016, Revised July 2020 Special acknowledgments go to Robin Greenwood and David Thesmar for thoughtful and extensive comments. We also thank Sergey Chernenko, Kent Daniel (NBER discussant), Itamar Drechsler, Thierry Foucault, Xavier Gabaix, Denis Gromb, Andrew Karolyi, Alberto Plazzi, Tarun Ramadorai (AFA discussant), Martin Schmalz, René Stulz, and Fabio Trojani as well as participants at the NBER Summer Institute (Risk of Financial Institutions) and seminars at Cornell University, the Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya, University of Texas at Austin, Georgia State University, Tilburg University, Maastricht University, HEC Paris, USI Lugano, Villanova University, The Ohio State University, the Bank for International Settlements, NBER Risk of Financial Institutions Summer Institute, and American Finance Association for helpful comments. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2016 by Itzhak Ben-David, Francesco Franzoni, Rabih Moussawi, and John Sedunov. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. The Granular Nature of Large Institutional Investors Itzhak Ben-David, Francesco Franzoni, Rabih Moussawi, and John Sedunov NBER Working Paper No.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutional Investor Study 2019
    Institutional Investor Study 2019 Geopolitics and investor expectations Marketing material for professional investors and advisers only Schroders Institutional Investor Study 2019 | Geopolitics and investor expectations 01 Contents 02 Executive summary 10 Investment goals • Generating income comes out on top 03 Portfolio performance Increasing allocations to fixed income • Geopolitical concerns dominate the investment landscape 12 Growing appetite for innovation • The quest for new, customised solutions 05 Return expectations • De-risking through LDI • Optimistic return expectations despite an uncertain landscape 14 Risk management strategies • The dominance of diversification 08 Staying strategic • Strategic asset allocation 16 About the Study driving decision making • Focus on long-term holding periods Schroders Institutional Investor Study 2019 | Geopolitics and investor expectations 02 Executive summary Geopolitical turbulence and the threat of a However, the most important investment Schroders’ third annual global economic slowdown are seen as the objective for investors for the next most important influences on a portfolio’s 12 months is meeting income and yield investment performance for the next 12 requirements (66%). Capital preservation Institutional Investor Study months. Since our inaugural Study in 2017, and generating high risk-adjusted returns we have seen investors become more rank second and third, illustrating how This Study analyses the investment perspectives of 650 institutional concerned about how world events are institutions are looking to more defensive investors, collectively responsible for $25.4 trillion in assets and from affecting growth (32% in 2017 vs. 52% in 2019). assets to de-risk portfolios during heightened 20 locations across the world. The Study provides a snapshot of some This is also evidenced by a steady decline in geopolitical uncertainty.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Debt in Asia: the Next Frontier?
    PRIVATE DEBT IN ASIA: THE NEXT FRONTIER? PRIVATE DEBT IN ASIA: THE NEXT FRONTIER? We take a look at the fund managers and investors turning to opportunities in Asia, analyzing funds closed and currently in market, as well as the investors targeting the region. nstitutional investors in 2018 are have seen increased fundraising success in higher than in 2016. While still dwarfed Iincreasing their exposure to private recent years. by the North America and Europe, Asia- debt strategies at a higher rate than focused fundraising has carved out a ever before, with many looking to both 2017 was a strong year for Asia-focused significant niche in the global private debt diversify their private debt portfolios and private debt fundraising, with 15 funds market. find less competed opportunities. Beyond reaching a final close, raising an aggregate the mature and competitive private debt $6.4bn in capital. This is the second highest Sixty percent of Asia-focused funds closed markets in North America and Europe, amount of capital raised targeting the in 2017 met or exceeded their initial target credit markets in Asia offer a relatively region to date and resulted in an average size including SSG Capital Partners IV, the untapped reserve of opportunity, and with fund size of $427mn. Asia-focused funds second largest Asia-focused fund to close the recent increase in investor interest accounted for 9% of all private debt funds last year, securing an aggregate $1.7bn, in this area, private debt fund managers closed in 2017, three-percentage points 26% more than its initial target.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutional Investment Mandates ANCHORS for LONG-TERM PERFORMANCE SECOND EDITION APRIL 2020
    REPORT Institutional Investment Mandates ANCHORS FOR LONG-TERM PERFORMANCE SECOND EDITION APRIL 2020 FCLTGlobal is dedicated to rebalancing investment and business decision-making towards the long-term objectives of funding economic growth and creating future savings. FCLTGlobal is a not-for-profit dedicated to can increase innovation, and create value. developing practical tools and approaches that FCLTGlobal was founded in 2016 by BlackRock, encourage long-term behaviors in business and Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, The Dow investment decision-making. It takes an active Chemical Company, McKinsey & Company, and and market-based approach to achieve its goals. Tata Sons out of the Focusing Capital on the Long By conducting research and convening business Term initiative. Its membership encompasses asset leaders, FCLTGlobal develops tools and generates owners, asset managers and corporations from awareness of ways in which a longer-term focus around the world. MEMBERS Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 4 Executive Summary 5 Institutional Investment Mandates: Anchors for Long-Term Performance 6 Top Ten List for Long-Term Mandates 7 Model for Long-Term Contract Provisions 9 Exploratory Provisions 10 Examples of Long-Term Mandates 11 Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan 12 Kempen Capital Management 13 MFS Investment Management 14 Adjusting Performance Reporting 15 Conclusion 16 Long-Term Model for Institutional Investment Mandates: Contract Provisions 17 Long-Term Model for Institutional Investment Mandates: Key Performance Indicators 19 Acknowledgments 19 Sources This document benefited from the insight and advice of FCLTGlobal’s Members and other experts. We are grateful for all the input we have received, but the final document is our own and the views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of FCLTGlobal’s Members or others.
    [Show full text]
  • Hedge Fund Standards Board
    Annual Report 2018 Established in 2008, the Standards Board for Alternative Investments (Standards Board or SBAI), (previously known as the Hedge Fund Standards Board (HFSB)) is a standard-setting body for the alternative investment industry and custodian of the Alternative Investment Standards (the Standards). It provides a powerful mechanism for creating a framework of transparency, integrity and good governance to simplify the investment process for managers and investors. The SBAI’s Standards and Guidance facilitate investor due diligence, provide a benchmark for manager practice and complement public policy. The Standards Board is a platform that brings together managers, investors and their peers to share areas of common concern, develop practical, industry-wide solutions and help to improve continuously how the industry operates. 2 Table of Contents Contents 1. Message from the Chairman ............................................................................................................... 5 2. Trustees and Regional Committees .................................................................................................... 8 Board of Trustees ................................................................................................................................ 8 Committees ......................................................................................................................................... 8 3. Key Highlights ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Themiddlemarket.Comt M
    OCTOBER 2017 GO GO BIG SMALL OR GO HOME Private equity investors are heading to the lower middle market and the 350,000 companies that populate it TheMiddleMarket.comT m 0C1_MAJ100117 1 9/1/2017 11:40:00 AM B:8.125” T:7.875” S:7.375” Your clients’ wealth has multiplied. B:10.75” T:10.5” So has their S:10” need for advice. We know, because we know you well. Knowing clients well gives us the insight to help with their wealth— and their lives. Together, with your expertise and ours, we’ll help your clients before, during and after the sale of their business. Find out how strong relationships lead to 95% client satisfaction. 844-208-7863 | bnymellonwealth.com | @BNYMellonWealth Source: 2016 Client Satisfaction Survey. BNY Mellon Wealth Management conducts business through various operating subsidiaries of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. ©2017 The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. All rights reserved. 002_MAJ1017 2 8/30/2017 5:39:07 PM WGMT “ADVICE” AD - SIZE A 33/34/65/5 PUB: MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS Filename: 724476-5_J0176_WGMT_Advice_Size_A_V3R.indd CLIENT: BNY MELLON PRODUCT: Print Ad Agency Job Number: J0176 Cradle Job Number: 724476-5 JOB#: J0176 SPACE: 4C Proof #: 3, release Path: EG-PLUS-NY:Volumes:EG-PLUS-NY:EGPlus_Departments:Print:A‚ÄîF:TBWA:BNY_ Created: 8-3-2017 12:00 PM BLEED: 8.125” x 10.75” MELLON:724476-5_J0176_WGMT_ Advice_Size_A_Ad:MECHANICALS:724476-5_J0176_WGMT_Advice_Size_A_V3R.indd Saved: 8-3-2017 2:15 PM TRIM: 7.875” x 10.5” Operators: april_relucio / Daniel-Rivera Printed: 8-3-2017 2:15 PM SAFETY: 7.375”
    [Show full text]
  • Private Equity Review
    the Private Equity Review Private Private Equity Review Eighth Edition Editor Stephen L Ritchie Eighth Edition Eighth lawreviews © 2019 Law Business Research Ltd Private Equity Review Eighth Edition Reproduced with permission from Law Business Research Ltd This article was first published in June 2019 For further information please contact [email protected] Editor Stephen L Ritchie lawreviews © 2019 Law Business Research Ltd PUBLISHER Tom Barnes SENIOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MANAGER Nick Barette BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MANAGER Joel Woods SENIOR ACCOUNT MANAGERS Pere Aspinall, Jack Bagnall ACCOUNT MANAGERS Olivia Budd, Katie Hodgetts, Reece Whelan PRODUCT MARKETING EXECUTIVE Rebecca Mogridge RESEARCH LEAD Kieran Hansen EDITORIAL COORDINATOR Tommy Lawson HEAD OF PRODUCTION Adam Myers PRODUCTION EDITOR Robbie Kelly SUBEDITOR Charlotte Stretch CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Paul Howarth Published in the United Kingdom by Law Business Research Ltd, London 87 Lancaster Road, London, W11 1QQ, UK © 2019 Law Business Research Ltd www.TheLawReviews.co.uk No photocopying: copyright licences do not apply. The information provided in this publication is general and may not apply in a specific situation, nor does it necessarily represent the views of authors’ firms or their clients. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any legal action based on the information provided. The publishers accept no responsibility for any acts or omissions contained herein. Although the information provided is accurate as at April 2019, be advised that this
    [Show full text]
  • Investment Section
    Investment Section Investment Overview Authority The Board has the responsibility to invest funds of the System in accordance with guidelines and limitations set forth in the Code and other applicable state law. Act 29 of 1994 authorizes the Board to invest the funds of the System using the “prudent person” standard that allows the Board to consider the probable safety of investments, avoid speculative investments, and invest as people of prudence, discretion, and intelligence would manage their own affairs. Policies and Objectives The Board is responsible for the formulation of investment policies for the System. The overall investment objectives of the System are to: (i) preserve capital in real terms; (ii) maximize total returns while limiting the risk of volatility through diversification; (iii) achieve returns in excess of the policy benchmark (the policy benchmark is a custom index created based on the Board established asset allocation structure to generate a return that meets the actuarial rate of return assumption); (iv) achieve a real rate of return over CPI over time; and, (v) provide sufficient liquidity to meet the current operating needs of the System. To achieve these objectives, the Board meets at least once per year to establish an overall asset allocation plan and investment policies for the System. Implementation of the investment policies is accomplished through external investment management firms who act as agents for the System and through internal investment managers. The Board also retains various investment consultants to assist with the formulation and implementation of investment policies. Operations The Board provides oversight of investment activities through the Finance Committee that makes recommendations to the Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Report | 2020
    Catalyzing a Better Future INTRODUCTION CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY RESPONSIBLE INVESTMENT FURTHER INFORMATION PageAbout Us OUR SUSTAINABILITY THE ISSUES THAT Title ABOUT US 2020 HIGHLIGHTS CEO LETTER AMBITION MATTER MOST TABLE OF CONTENTS Ares is a leading global alternative investment manager with $197 billion1 in assets INTRODUCTION RESPONSIBLE under management across our integrated groups: Credit, Private Equity, Real Estate INVESTMENT 1 About Us and Strategic Initiatives. How we scale our impact through the 2 2020 Highlights companies and assets we invest in. Our investment groups collaborate to seek to deliver innovative investment solutions designed to achieve 3 CEO Letter 16 Responsible Investment attractive investment returns for investors across market cycles. 4 Our Sustainability Ambition 18 Credit Group We believe our global footprint throughout North America, Europe, Asia Pacific and the Middle East is a key 5 The Issues That Matter Most 19 Direct Lending advantage in providing us with deep knowledge and extensive networks and resources in the markets we invest in. CORPORATE 21 Private Equity Group SUSTAINABILITY 22 Corporate Private Equity How we strive to lead by example 24 Real Estate Group through our own sustainable 25 Real Estate Equity business practices. 7 Corporate Sustainability FURTHER ES OF CA ENT OF 8 Supporting & Developing Talent INFORMATION RC PIT YM CAP OU A LO IT S L EP A 26 Conclusion & Looking Forward D L 9 Diversity, Equity & Inclusion 10 Philanthropy 27 Disclosures 11 Climate Change 47 End Notes ENT GEM COR 12 Governance, Compliance & Ethics NA P A OR M A 13 Cybersecurity S T We source capital from E IO We are invested in 2,800+ R N 14 Business Continuity a variety of investors A portfolio companies including 1,090+ direct institutional relationships We have 1,450+ employees collaborating across 25+ offices2 ABOUT THIS REPORT Our dedication to sustainability within our organization and investment practices spans nearly a decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Probitas Partners 2021 Institutional Investors Private Equity Survey December 2020 Table of Contents
    Probitas Partners 2021 Institutional Investors Private Equity Survey December 2020 Table of Contents Topic Page . Survey Highlights 2 . Background and Appetite 3 . Sectors of Interest 9 . Geographies of Interest 18 . Middle-Market Buyouts 25 . Venture Capital 28 . Niche Sectors 31 . Structural Issues 38 . Investor Fears 43 . Summary 46 Confidential and Trade Secret © 2020 Probitas Partners 1 Survey Highlights – and The Pandemic . The Pandemic has had a roller coaster impact on institutional investors during 2020 as the normal market environment of January plunged into volatility and uncertainty in March and April followed by a slow rebound in public market and private market valuations . By late October prices for many firms returned to January levels as various stimulus plans mitigated certain economic impacts and progress in developing vaccines gave hope for a return to “normal” sometime in 2021 . Probitas’ latest annual survey was taken over the first two weeks of November after the markets had recovered significantly from the depths of April – and the results of a survey done in April would have been very different from what we are showing now . In private equity, investors are still heavily focused on U.S. and European Middle- Market Buyouts and U.S. Growth Capital, though interest in Asian private equity has increased from this time last year . In the second and third quarter of 2020 there was sharply increased interest in secondaries and distressed private equity – but at this point, many investors seem to have already made their bets in these sectors and are waiting for their commitments to be invested before committing too much more to these sectors .
    [Show full text]
  • Reminder: Certain U.S. Reporting and Compliance Obligations for Investment Advisers and Private Funds
    Reminder: Certain U.S. Reporting and Compliance Obligations for Investment Advisers and Private Funds A legal update from Dechert's Financial Services Group February 2020 Reminder: Certain U.S. Reporting and Compliance Obligations for Investment Advisers and Private Funds The U.S. federal securities laws, the Commodity Exchange Act and regulations thereunder, and certain other applicable federal laws, rules and regulations, as well as rules of U.S. self-regulatory organizations (such as the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and National Futures Association) impose reporting and compliance obligations on asset managers and investment funds. Some of these requirements apply only to U.S.-registered investment advisers, commodity pool operators or commodity trading advisors, but others apply to investment managers and funds that are located outside the United States and are not registered in the United States. This Dechert OnPoint provides a brief description of some of these requirements and serves as a reminder of the need for compliance. However, it is not intended to provide a complete discussion of all reporting and compliance requirements that may be applicable to investment advisers and private funds. Note that – other than for advisory filings of Forms ADV and PF (see Annual Updating of Adviser’s Form ADV; Private Fund Reporting by Registered Advisers) – if the filing date falls on a weekend or federal holiday, the filing is not due until the next business day. Reporting of Significant Positions in U.S. Equity Securities Investment advisers and funds that have discretion over, or beneficially own, more than certain amounts of equity securities registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) may have to report these holdings to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
    [Show full text]
  • ONS Acquisition Corp. Form S-1/A Filed 2021-07-19
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM S-1/A General form of registration statement for all companies including face-amount certificate companies [amend] Filing Date: 2021-07-19 SEC Accession No. 0001213900-21-037309 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER ONS Acquisition Corp. Mailing Address Business Address 407 N. MAPLE DRIVE, SUITE 407 N. MAPLE DRIVE, SUITE CIK:1810200| IRS No.: 000000000 | State of Incorp.:E9 | Fiscal Year End: 1231 GRD1 GRD1 Type: S-1/A | Act: 33 | File No.: 333-254495 | Film No.: 211096425 BEVERLY HILLS CA 90210 BEVERLY HILLS CA 90210 SIC: 6770 Blank checks 3103676825 Copyright © 2021 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document As filed with U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on July 16, 2021 Registration No. 333-254495 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 __________________________________________ Amendment No. 3 to Form S-1 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 __________________________________________ ONS Acquisition Corp. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) __________________________________________ Cayman Islands 6770 N/A (State or other jurisdiction of (Primary Standard Industrial (I.R.S. Employer Incorporation or organization) Classification Code Number) Identification No.) 407 N. Maple Drive, Ground Floor Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Telephone: (424) 210-9848 (Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices) __________________________________________ Alexander Crutchfield Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman 407 N. Maple Drive, Ground Floor Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Telephone: (424) 210-9848 (Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service) __________________________________________ Copies to: Christian O.
    [Show full text]